| === pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu | ||
| === akgraner_ is now known as akgraner | ||
| evanrmurphy | andrew_sayers: I'm considering that "FlowQ" might be marginally better than "Flowq" (somehow easier for me to process, more reminiscent of "FAQ"). Thoughts? | 22:00 |
|---|---|---|
| andrew_sayers | There's already a program called FlowQ though. | 22:01 |
| andrew_sayers | It's in a pretty tangential area, which is why I figured it was okay so long as it's not completely identical. | 22:02 |
| evanrmurphy | Ah. :) | 22:03 |
| andrew_sayers | Anyway, I'm done for the day. Until tomorrow. | 22:09 |
| evanrmurphy | andrew_sayers: I like the upper limit of 7 (and its justification) on branch node answers, but when it comes to the longest route to action nodes, 7 strikes me as high. I think most users would be find it irritating to click through 7 questions before finding a semi-definitive answer to their real question. | 22:23 |
| evanrmurphy | I'm not sure I have a better upper limit to define, but my point is that it may be more important to keep a Flowq route a good deal shorter than 7, whereas a multiple-choice list of 7 isn't too bad. | 22:25 |
| evanrmurphy | The other problem with long routes is that each node a user passes through, the more likely s/he is to not perceive the answer to his/her question as one of the listed ones and instead choose "None of the above" to ask directly in the forum. | 22:28 |
| evanrmurphy | This detail aside, I'm impressed so far with what you have at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Flowq, and I just subscribed. | 22:28 |
| evanrmurphy | andrew_sayers: Can you send me a link to the other project "FlowQ"? | 22:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!