| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu | ||
| RoAkSoAx | vorian, ping | 01:00 |
|---|---|---|
| stochastic | anyone feel like helping me troubleshoot this package build error from pbuilder: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/218445/ I have both libboost-dev and libboost_thread-dev installed but it looks like it can't find them | 02:15 |
| bddebian | stochastic: You need to make it use libboot_thread-mt if you are using the newest boost libs | 02:17 |
| stochastic | bddebian, okay I'll hunt that down. thanks. | 02:17 |
| bddebian | NP, just wherever it is linking use -lboost_thread-mt | 02:18 |
| binarymutant | I've got a normal 'dh $@' package, but for some reason it can't copy to debian/<package> . Why is this happening? | 02:22 |
| pochu | what do you mean with "can't copy"? | 02:23 |
| binarymutant | pochu, erm not copy but it can't build into debian/<packagename> | 02:25 |
| binarymutant | pochu, dh_auto_install: command returned error code 512 | 02:25 |
| pochu | well, that alone is not very helpful | 02:27 |
| pochu | how about a pastebin with more context? | 02:27 |
| pochu | how many binary packages your package builds? | 02:28 |
| binarymutant | pochu, just 1 | 02:28 |
| directhe` | if it only builds one, wouldn't it not use debian/packagename? isn't that reserved for foo.install (rather than just install) situations? | 02:29 |
| pochu | directhe`: if it only builds one, debhelper defaults to debian/<packagename> rather than debian/tmp, which is used when there are more than one | 02:30 |
| RoAkSoAx | can anyone please review/advocate: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gnome-gmail-notifier http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/lekhonee thank you :) | 02:30 |
| binarymutant | pochu, http://paste.ubuntu.com/218457/ if this helps | 02:30 |
| bddebian | Maybe it doesn't support DESTDIR? | 02:30 |
| binarymutant | bddebian, I think it does | 02:32 |
| binarymutant | this is my Makefile http://paste.ubuntu.com/218463/ | 02:33 |
| pochu | binarymutant: did you create usr/lib first? | 02:35 |
| pochu | it seems you didn't | 02:36 |
| directhe` | dirs? | 02:38 |
| binarymutant | awesome thanks everyone :) | 02:43 |
| stochastic | I'm trying to build a deb for this software that builds but doesn't install system wide (i.e. it just creates an executable in the local build file) How do I make the deb install it system wide? | 02:49 |
| TheMuso | stochastic: If there are no commands in a makefile etc to install the binary, you just ahve to copy the binary into place. | 02:56 |
| stochastic | TheMuso, in a deb that would be done by "cp name /usr/bin/name" in debian/rules? or is it more/less complex than that? | 02:57 |
| TheMuso | Thats what you would have to do, yes. | 02:57 |
| TheMuso | If you are using cdbs however, you have to do it a different way. | 02:58 |
| stochastic | cdbs? | 02:58 |
| stochastic | I just did dh_make to get the basic deb started | 02:59 |
| a|wen | stochastic: look at dh_install | 03:00 |
| TheMuso | stochastic: ok then you just copy the file. | 03:07 |
| TheMuso | a|wen: Thats really only useful if there are many many files to copy. If there is only one file, then its probably pointless using it. | 03:08 |
| TheMuso | stochastic: Mind you, using dh_install would be useful if there is ever likely to be more files that need to be put into place. | 03:08 |
| a|wen | TheMuso: dh_install and then just point to the single file in rules works well ... i'd say use dh_install always | 03:09 |
| stochastic | TheMuso, a|wen, but whichever method I use, the correct path should be /usr/bin/name | 03:11 |
| TheMuso | a|wen: Right, but I always think that if you use dh_install, its much better to use debian/$packagename.install files. | 03:11 |
| TheMuso | stochastic: right | 03:11 |
| vorian | RoAkSoAx: yo | 03:11 |
| a|wen | TheMuso: with multiple files it is ... if we are talking one file, i would just use it in rules | 03:12 |
| vorian | rules shmules | 03:12 |
| vorian | who needs em | 03:12 |
| stochastic | a|wen, TheMuso, thanks. | 03:12 |
| a|wen | vorian: you almost get your wish ... getting close to doing without the file with dh7 ;) | 03:13 |
| TheMuso | a|wen: Yes but using install files from the get go allows for much less work when more files need to be copied. | 03:14 |
| a|wen | TheMuso: true ... but using cp in rules instead of dh_install doesn't help on that :) | 03:14 |
| TheMuso | Yeah I know. So use whatever you wish stochastic. | 03:15 |
| stochastic | TheMuso, when I try to use "cp name /usr/bin/name" I get a "Cannot create /usr/bin/name: Permission Denied" error while building. Here's the full build output if that helps: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29030820/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.xwax_0.5-0ubuntu1~ppa~jaunty3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 03:30 |
| stochastic | is that because it's using cdbs? | 03:30 |
| stochastic | a|wen ^ (looks like TheMuso just left) | 03:31 |
| a|wen | stochastic: it is not located in /usr/bin/name when building, but in (build-dir)/debian/name-of-package/usr/bin/name | 03:34 |
| a|wen | stochastic: dh_install takes care of all that automatic ... another reason for using that over cp | 03:34 |
| stochastic | a|wen, if I use dh_install how do I format the specification of which file to move? | 03:35 |
| stochastic | is it just like "dh_install name /usr/bin/name" | 03:36 |
| a|wen | that should work | 03:36 |
| a|wen | or "dh_install name usr/bin/" | 03:36 |
| RoAkSoAx | vorian, heya hwo's it going? | 03:43 |
| a|wen | stochastic: have to go now ... if you haven't got it working, just speak up in here; there is probably some other people who can help out | 03:58 |
| === ApOgEE__ is now known as ApOgEE | ||
| AnAnt | Hello, is CC-BY-ND a non-free license ? | 04:50 |
| AnAnt | Attribution-No Derivative | 04:50 |
| evanrmurphy | pochu: I was asking about the virtual machine so I could try and fix my first bug, I'm a prospective MOTU. Is this really the wrong channel? | 04:51 |
| RAOF | Sounds non-free to me. | 04:51 |
| RAOF | Also, CC licenses are crap. | 04:51 |
| evanrmurphy | Thanks for the help though, I'll try #ubuntu-server. | 04:51 |
| RAOF | They point towards this totally vague and incomplete motherhood license. | 04:51 |
| ScottK | RAOF: One of the reasons a package has to include a full copy of the license in the tarball. | 04:52 |
| RAOF | AnAnt: ND is definitely going to make it non-free; we're unable to alter it. | 04:54 |
| ScottK | AnAnt: Absolutely what RAOF said. | 04:54 |
| AnAnt | ok | 04:54 |
| RoAkSoAx | evanrmurphy, what do you wanna do? | 04:55 |
| evanrmurphy | RoAkSoAx: I was trying to decide whether to set up KVM or VirtualBox to run a VM of a different Ubuntu release. I noticed that KVM seemed to be preferred for various reasons, but that it always comes with the warning of needing a processor with VT extensions. | 04:58 |
| RoAkSoAx | evanrmurphy, I'm running KVM in a non VT processor and works fine but kinda slow | 04:59 |
| jmarsden | evanrmurphy: I use VirtualBox for the same reason... no VT here... so it seems different folks take different approaches to this :) | 05:00 |
| evanrmurphy | RoAkSoAx: Ah, that's good to know. Do you remember choosing between running paravirtualization and full virtualization (or something like that)? | 05:01 |
| evanrmurphy | jmarsden: I appreciate the response, glad I'm not the only one. :) | 05:02 |
| RoAkSoAx | evanrmurphy, I actually don't remember :) sorry :( | 05:02 |
| evanrmurphy | RoAkSoAx: Don't worry about it. Thanks all for the help! (Off to bed.) | 05:02 |
| AnAnt | how about CC-BY ? | 05:03 |
| AnAnt | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode | 05:04 |
| AnAnt | Attribution | 05:04 |
| RAOF | AnAnt: http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses | 05:04 |
| AnAnt | RAOF: thank ! | 05:05 |
| AnAnt | RAOF: thanks ! | 05:05 |
| RoAkSoAx | evanrmurphy, night :) | 05:05 |
| RAOF | AnAnt: Note the bit under the "CC-BY-SA 2.5 is DFSG incompatible" has a statement that the ftpmasters are OK with CC-BY-SA 3.0 | 05:07 |
| AnAnt | RAOF: and CC-BY 3.0 too | 05:07 |
| AnAnt | Ftpmasters have already accepted CC-by and CC-by-sa 3.0 | 05:08 |
| RAOF | Right. | 05:08 |
| AnAnt | thanks for that wiki link | 05:09 |
| porthose | nhandler: would you please have a look at bug 389654 when you have time and leave a comment | 05:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 389654 in lyricue "Please upgrade lyricue" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/389654 | 05:13 |
| nhandler | porthose: Yeah, although it might need to wait until tomorrow, I'm heading to bed soon | 05:13 |
| porthose | nhandler: works for me gnight | 05:14 |
| fabrice_sp | good morning! While merging a package (pilot-link), I've found a .udev file in debian directory, but it doesn't seems to be installed in any package. What is it for? | 06:04 |
| fabrice_sp | other question: what should I do if the changelog's entries for Ubuntu has been lost in previous merge? Should I restore them or respect the previous merger choice (pitti)? | 06:20 |
| btm | Is there a way to tell why ganglia-monitor wasn't auto-synced into karmic before DIF? (Bug #302640) | 06:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 302640 in ganglia-monitor-core "Please sync 3.1.1-1 from experimental" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/302640 | 06:27 |
| wgrant | btm: We don't sync from experimental by default. | 06:28 |
| btm | wgrant: it's in testing now actually. | 06:28 |
| btm | wgrant: although the date of that change may have something to do with that. | 06:28 |
| btm | wgrant: it was just in experimental six months ago when I opened that bug. | 06:29 |
| wgrant | btm: You mean the 'ganglia' source, not 'ganglia-monitor-core'? | 06:29 |
| wgrant | It entered unstable a day under two weeks ago. | 06:30 |
| wgrant | After DIF. | 06:30 |
| btm | word, yeah, that makes sense. | 06:30 |
| micahg | IS the perl artistic license compatible with Ubuntu? | 06:31 |
| lifeless | I believe we have lots of perl code under said licence in Ubuntu already | 06:31 |
| btm | wgrant: so I should track someone down who'll issue an FFE? | 06:32 |
| wgrant | micahg: The Perl license isn't really a license of its own, IIRC. | 06:33 |
| wgrant | But Artistic License 1.0 and 2.0 are DFSG-free. | 06:33 |
| wgrant | btm: No - you just have to request a sync. | 06:34 |
| wgrant | btm: DIF is just when automatic imports stop. No exception is needed until FF. | 06:34 |
| btm | wgrant: got it. i'll edit that bug | 06:36 |
| stochastic | Hey everyone, I've found a tutorial that walked me through writing my first man page for this package I'm working on, but now I'm wondering if there's any adjustment to debian/rules that's needed to make sure the binaryName.1 files are installed to the right place? | 06:38 |
| porthose | stochastic: dh_installman, if using dh 7 should be automatic | 06:41 |
| stochastic | porthose, and as long as the binaryName.1 files are inside the debian/ subdirectory everything will be golden? | 06:42 |
| porthose | stochastic: yes | 06:42 |
| porthose | stochastic: you may need to add binaryName.manpages file to the debian dir | 06:47 |
| stochastic | porthose, do you know of any howto or help page in the wiki that can walk me through this? | 06:48 |
| porthose1 | have a look at man dh_installman | 06:48 |
| stochastic | Does anyone want to do a revu of http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/a2jmidid ? The latest update fixes all the issues fabrice_sp had touched on last time. | 06:54 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, did you test build the package and run lintian on the deb? | 06:59 |
| stochastic | fabrice_sp, pbuilder is working away right now | 06:59 |
| stochastic | fabrice_sp, would you like me to upload the latest to my PPA for a more public build/test ground? | 07:00 |
| fabrice_sp | just run lintian on the resulting deb: that would throw all 'basic' errors. Any reviewer should build the package, anyway, so no need to upload to a ppa | 07:02 |
| stochastic | fabrice_sp, now lintian is telling me that binary-idep is a required target, but you had told me to delete those targets... | 07:04 |
| \sh | moins | 07:04 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, hmm, I think I told you you to empty them | 07:05 |
| fabrice_sp | \sh, moins | 07:05 |
| stochastic | my misunderstanding | 07:05 |
| fabrice_sp | statik, before writing my comments, I thought about it, but remember that they should exist :-) | 07:06 |
| fabrice_sp | You just confirmed me that :-) | 07:06 |
| fabrice_sp | sorry statik, , not for you | 07:06 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, ^ | 07:06 |
| stochastic | fabrice_sp, lintian is also telling me that there's no manpages for items I have manpages for, and that it doesn't have a copyright file when clearly it does. Any hints on how to fix these warnings? | 07:10 |
| fabrice_sp | check that you have dh_installman called, the file <package>.manpages in debian. For copyright, perhaps you miss a dh_installdocs call? | 07:14 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, ^ | 07:14 |
| stochastic | fabrice_sp, you told me to get rid of dh_installdocs because there were no docs to install | 07:18 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, my bad: it installs automatically the copyright file. sorry | 07:19 |
| fabrice_sp | (checked with man dh_installdocs | 07:19 |
| stochastic | fabrice_sp, in the <package>.manpages, is it just a listing of the manpages to install or is there further formatting that is needed? | 07:20 |
| fabrice_sp | this is the proff that I still have a lot ot learn! | 07:20 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, just the list | 07:20 |
| fabrice_sp | but the full path | 07:20 |
| fabrice_sp | for example: debian/man/pilot-undelete.1 | 07:20 |
| fabrice_sp | well, the relative path | 07:21 |
| stochastic | one path per line? | 07:21 |
| fabrice_sp | yes | 07:22 |
| fabrice_sp | path + file per line | 07:22 |
| dholbach | good morning | 07:23 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, actually, of you want to check what this command is doing during the build, you can export DH_VERBOSE=1 at the beginning of your rules file | 07:24 |
| fabrice_sp | Hey dholbach ! | 07:24 |
| fabrice_sp | stochastic, have to go now, but you can still ask questions here. bye | 07:24 |
| dholbach | hey fabrice_sp | 07:25 |
| stochastic | can someone help me get dh_installman to work for me? it's man page is not helping me and thats all anyone has been able to point me to so far. I just need to get four simple man pages installed but it's not working. | 07:59 |
| TheMuso | stochastic: Whats happening exactly? | 08:07 |
| stochastic | TheMuso, this is the latest error: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/218642/ | 08:10 |
| TheMuso | stochastic: what does a2jmidi.manpages contain | 08:11 |
| stochastic | TheMuso, the contents of debian/a2jmidid.manpages http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/218644/ | 08:12 |
| TheMuso | Hrm ok my guess is the manpges themselves are not written properly/malformed. | 08:12 |
| TheMuso | one or more of them | 08:13 |
| stochastic | TheMuso, here are the contents of the four manpages: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/218645/ | 08:14 |
| stochastic | ahh, I think I see the last one is missing the .TH header | 08:15 |
| stochastic | wait, nope, it's there | 08:15 |
| stochastic | could it be that I'm calling dh_installman improperly? | 08:16 |
| === ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| === ember_ is now known as ember | ||
| warp10 | If an app works both from terminal and from GUI, what's the best option for the needs: field in debian/menu? | 11:34 |
| slytherin | warp10: is debian/menu still used? | 11:46 |
| warp10 | slytherin: maybe on some kind of very old machine. In any case, I'm packaging a software for Debian, and a menu file doesn't hurt | 11:48 |
| slytherin | warp10: what does 'old machine' have to do with it? | 11:48 |
| warp10 | slytherin: I just mean that a tipical machine uses a .desktop files based menu system, and I expect that menu files based ones are more common on machines that are not that recent | 11:50 |
| slytherin | warp10: Your choice. I wouldn't create menu file if I was packaging from scratch. | 11:53 |
| therm | could someone have a look at my packages? Would like to have them in karmic: | 12:07 |
| therm | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/swtcalendar | 12:08 |
| therm | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/willuhnutil | 12:08 |
| therm | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/h2database | 12:09 |
| therm | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/willuhndatasource | 12:09 |
| hhb | how do i deal with patches that need to modify autotools files (configure.in, Makefile.am etc)? | 12:37 |
| hhb | do i need to include the resulting changes to "configure" in the patch, or is there a way to trigger regenerating this one via boostrap / autogen.sh ? | 12:38 |
| Laney | Are the MC going to send a coordinated response to the new application process? | 12:45 |
| Laney | hhb: There are two common ways - include a patch with the results of rerunning the autotools stuff, or running it at build-time (make sure your clean target works properly if you do this) | 12:45 |
| hhb | hm, i think i'll try the first option first. thanks. | 12:47 |
| geser | Laney: I guess will we discuss it today on our weekly MC call | 12:47 |
| Laney | geser: cool. Might be nice to invite wider comment? | 12:50 |
| === proppy1 is now known as proppy | ||
| geser | Laney: will mention it, but feel free to comment on your own | 12:53 |
| Laney | might just do that | 12:54 |
| didrocks | just a stupid question on revu: the Warnings telling "The GPL is mentionned in debian/copyright, but ... not in source ..." is not a showstopper? (some packages are uploaded without it. I reckon this is because we have the copy in our debian FS). And this is an added check to lintian (lintian file size is 0 and we still see this warning)? | 12:59 |
| Laney | I thought that upstream were supposed to include a copy of the GPL | 13:00 |
| didrocks | yes, I think that, but some package are accepted without having it. That's why I wanted to be sure about the policy we have (and I'm surprised that this is not a lintian check) | 13:01 |
| Laney | ask an archive admin ;) | 13:02 |
| didrocks | yes, that's a possibility :) | 13:03 |
| geser | every source package is required to have a verbatim copy of the license text | 13:03 |
| didrocks | conquently, some packages are wrongly advocated | 13:04 |
| slytherin | didrocks: No, some packages simply name the license file differently. Or they are located in a sub folder. | 13:09 |
| slytherin | didrocks: revu checks for presence of LICENSE or COPYING file AFAIK. | 13:10 |
| didrocks | slytherin: ok, thanks for the update. Are there somewhere listed the additionnal control made by revu compared to lintian? | 13:11 |
| slytherin | didrocks: You can ask revu hackers, or if you are brave enough check revu code on launchpad. | 13:17 |
| didrocks | slytherin: I will have a look, thanks :) | 13:18 |
| _andre | would anyone like to review/recommend the following packages? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/watchcatd http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libwcat http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libapache2-mod-watchcat | 13:26 |
| _andre | they're lintian/revu clean | 13:27 |
| _andre | i finally managed to convince my boss to move our servers to ubuntu, and these packages are fundamental for our web servers | 13:28 |
| _andre | :) | 13:28 |
| alkisg | Hi, I'm using reprepro to manage a repository, and I'm getting "gpgme gave GPGME error: Bad passphrase". I don't have GUI access to use seahorse, and it seems that I'm unable to get gpg-agent to cooperate with reprepro... Any help? | 13:33 |
| alkisg | OK, got it :) | 13:46 |
| RainCT | james_w: I've just uploaded Zeitgeist again, I'd appreciate if you could take a look at it :) | 13:50 |
| james_w | RainCT: I'll take a look after lunch | 13:51 |
| RainCT | james_w: Great, thanks. | 13:51 |
| LarstiQ | what is this Zeitgeist I keep hearing of? | 13:54 |
| RainCT | LarstiQ: http://bloc.eurion.net/archives/2009/zeitgeist-is-out/ :) | 13:59 |
| LarstiQ | RainCT: thanks! | 14:00 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| slytherin | ttx: ping | 15:01 |
| ttx | slytherin: pong | 15:02 |
| slytherin | ttx: pm? | 15:02 |
| ttx | slytherin: sure | 15:02 |
| === proppy1 is now known as proppy | ||
| === mterry_ is now known as mterry | ||
| gnomefreak | nn/win 20 | 16:02 |
| DktrKranz | has anyone familiar with intltoor ever happened to see something similar to http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29048481/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.kupfer_0%2Bc3-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz? | 16:17 |
| Laney | dholbach: Need to move my UDW talk to friday, going to be at a conference the rest of that week | 16:51 |
| Laney | anyone want monday 1800? | 16:51 |
| dholbach | Laney: are you happy with any of the slots still available? | 16:52 |
| Laney | Friday's ones are fine | 16:52 |
| dholbach | Laney: then just move it | 16:52 |
| dholbach | that's fine | 16:52 |
| Laney | alright | 16:52 |
| dholbach | I'll update it in the booklet thingie | 16:52 |
| * Laney goes cross-eyed at wiki table syntax | 16:53 | |
| cpscotti | Hey.. what means the "Done" queue on lunchpad? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+queue?queue_state=3&queue_text= . Done means accepted by the archive admins? rejected?? | 17:24 |
| Ampelbein | cpscotti: "done" means that processing of the file is finished, i.e. accepted, built and published. | 17:30 |
| cpscotti | Ampelbein: thanks! | 17:31 |
| Laibsch1 | Hi | 18:14 |
| Laibsch1 | How do I teach pdebuild about karmic until a proper fix is released? -> bug 399830 | 18:14 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 399830 in pbuilder "karmic pdebuild is unaware of the Karmic distribution/release" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/399830 | 18:14 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| evanrmurphy | I'm browsing the harvest list because I want to fix my first bug. Would any bug I work on be for the development release, or does it depend? Thank you. | 19:01 |
| Laibsch | evanrmurphy: Bugs are usually fixed first in the development release (i.e. Karmic right now) | 19:07 |
| Laibsch | They may later be backported to stable releases | 19:07 |
| evanrmurphy | Laibsch: Thank you! | 19:07 |
| === boshhead_ is now known as boshhead | ||
| therm | Hello @all | 20:40 |
| therm | is there someone who likes reviewing http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/h2database ? | 20:41 |
| therm | Sorry that I ask this, but is it really the right way here to get packages in Ubuntu? | 20:52 |
| directhex | therm, yes. but auditing packages is lengthy and boring work, so you need to rely on someone with the appropriate knowledge to take their free time and spend it reading copyright | 20:55 |
| directhex | broadly speaking it looks okay, given i have no java skill - but i'd strongly recommend relicensing your debian/ to something else, i.e. the same license as the app itself, to eliminate the big revu warning | 20:58 |
| therm | directhex: I know that this is much work, but I have feeling that no one really cares about the packages uploaded on revu. I would like to help later when my experience is greater, but for now I am waiting every day that some on gives a comment for my packages so that this might be in karmic | 20:59 |
| ScottK | therm: The other option is to get it into Debian and then we sync from there. | 21:00 |
| directhex | therm, there's your comment. due to the licensing of debian/ you now have to worry whether the contents of debian/patches/ which are GPL can be linked against the rest | 21:01 |
| directhex | which just causes issues | 21:01 |
| directhex | oh, and the current standards version is 3.8.2 | 21:01 |
| therm | directhex: thank you very much | 21:01 |
| Laney | therm: the best option IMHO is to find a team in Debian/Ubuntu that cares for the area your package is in | 21:02 |
| therm | ScottK: I heard of that but never found a website wich is telling the process, like revu for ubuntu | 21:02 |
| Laney | you are likely to get faster and better reviews then | 21:02 |
| ScottK | therm: Look at mentors.debian.net | 21:02 |
| therm | ScottK: thanks I will read it | 21:03 |
| Laney | I've found that to be an even worse black hole, fwiw | 21:03 |
| directhex | "talk to the java team" is what Laney is saying | 21:04 |
| Laney | yes sir | 21:04 |
| therm | Laney: would like to do that but dont now how^^, the only one I had contact to was https://launchpad.net/~onkarshinde | 21:05 |
| Laney | therm: google "debian java team" and find an IRC channel or mailing list | 21:06 |
| Laney | or ubuntu java team | 21:06 |
| therm | ok thanks | 21:07 |
| Zhenech | nellery, ping | 21:22 |
| === so is now known as simon-o | ||
| === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
| === RoAk is now known as RoAkSoAx | ||
| RoAkSoAx | Hey guys. I'm updating a package. The new version contains hidden folders: ".svn". Should I remove those hidden folders from the source directory and tarball? | 22:07 |
| sebner | RoAkSoAx: yes and tell upstream | 22:07 |
| Laney | sebner: you'd remove them from the orig? | 22:09 |
| RoAkSoAx | sebner, Ok. will do thanks :). What about the debian directory provided by upstream? (It's adding entries to the changelog for Hardy, because they have seen to be doing their tests in a Hardy box) | 22:09 |
| Laney | urgh | 22:09 |
| sebner | Laney: sure, you donÄt? | 22:09 |
| Laney | no I wouldn't repack for that | 22:09 |
| sebner | Laney: gnah see. Upstream debian folder too | 22:09 |
| sebner | lovely upstream | 22:09 |
| RoAkSoAx | sebner, So i should remove upstream debian directory too in this case to not have those changelog entries? | 22:10 |
| sebner | RoAkSoAx: Upstream *should not* provide a debian directory. That's packagers job | 22:11 |
| RoAkSoAx | sebner, right. They also provided the debian dir on the previous version. I just don't know how to handle that in this case, because it seems that in the previous version, Debian has removed the debian/ dir to create their own. I'm updating ipvsadm btw | 22:13 |
| sebner | RoAkSoAx: that's the prefered way. You can do that by implementing a get-orig-source rule in debian/rules but collaborating with debian is the most prefered way :) | 22:14 |
| RoAkSoAx | sebner, Ok. Will talk to debian maintainer then :). Thanks a lot | 22:15 |
| sebner | np. let's have fun =) | 22:17 |
| fabrice_sp | Hi. gpiv is building fine in a clean chroot (using sbuild). Is it possible to relaunch the building of this package? | 22:18 |
| fabrice_sp | According to http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/, it's failing to build | 22:18 |
| geser | yes, a "give-back" to the buildds | 22:20 |
| sebner | geser: \o/ | 22:21 |
| fabrice_sp | and who can do that? Motus or it has to be an archive admin? | 22:21 |
| geser | anyone who can upload to that component | 22:22 |
| geser | so MOTUs for universe/multiverse and core-devs for everything | 22:22 |
| fabrice_sp | ok | 22:22 |
| geser | fabrice_sp: done | 22:23 |
| fabrice_sp | as gpiv is in universe, shall I assume you will do it? :-D | 22:23 |
| fabrice_sp | great! tahnks :-) | 22:23 |
| fabrice_sp | 6 hours to go for amd64 build, but only 8 minutes for i386 ?! | 22:25 |
| geser | PPA or main archive? | 22:26 |
| fabrice_sp | main archive: gpiv | 22:28 |
| fabrice_sp | by the way: this error is suppose to be fixed ,right? : dpkg: error processing ca-certificates-java (--configure): | 22:28 |
| geser | yes | 22:29 |
| fabrice_sp | so could you please force the rebuild of jabsorb package? :-D | 22:29 |
| geser | hmm, the queue doesn't look that long for both i386 and amd64: | 22:29 |
| geser | https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ | 22:30 |
| geser | fabrice_sp: have you checked that it builds not and not fails due to an other reason? | 22:30 |
| fabrice_sp | good point geser: I'll sbuild it locally before | 22:31 |
| RainCT | Can someone point me to any docs about package configuration (ie. how to have something show up when dpkg-reconfigure is run)? | 22:32 |
| fabrice_sp | geser, you were right: it FTBFS because of a missing dependency (it seems to miss package javax.servlet). Will have a look tomorrow. bye | 22:41 |
| * RainCT tries debconf-doc | 22:49 | |
| kwadronaut | i'm not aware of the right procedures, who to poke etc. basically silc-* in hardy has a security vulnerability, debian old-stable has a version which fixes this issue, there's a bug on launchpad and no action. | 23:34 |
| kwadronaut | so, what's next? | 23:34 |
| ScottK | kwadronaut: Make a patch (debdiff preferred) and attach it to the bug. | 23:37 |
| ScottK | Make sure the ubuntu-security team is subscribed to it and mark it in progress after it has the patch. | 23:37 |
| kwadronaut | ScottK: pulling from 'upstream' debian is not an option? | 23:39 |
| Laney | we need a minimal patch to fix the issue | 23:40 |
| ScottK | kwadronaut: If you look at the diff between the old-stable version that's fixed and the one before that's not fixed you should be well on your way to having a minimal patch. | 23:41 |
| kwadronaut | ok, thanks for the info | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!