=== pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu === mdz_ is now known as mdz [11:22] davmor2: hello [11:23] hello back davmor2_ [11:31] adium themes :) === torkiano is now known as jjardon [12:03] guys acn someone else test if salut in empathy karmic can talk to bonjour in pidgin jaunty please? === fader|away is now known as fader_ [14:53] meh works after a reboot so don't worry :) [17:27] hey eeejay_ :) [17:28] Hey ara! Is the meeting in 30 minutes? [17:28] eeejay_, QA meeting is in 30 minutes, but auto testing meeting is in 2 minutes [17:28] * ara wonders who is going to show up... [17:29] Good question [17:29] I think I will [17:30] eeejay_, hehe [17:31] ara: started working on ubiquity testing. Very exciting [17:32] eeejay_, cool :) [17:33] eeejay_, do you have any news about daily testing? cr3 is not online, apparently [17:34] ara: Nope! [17:35] ara: Maybe everyone went to a conference on some island. [17:35] eeejay_, have you seen the merge request I sent today? suite args were not working in mago... [17:36] ara: No, didn't see that. Will look now [17:38] Lp is slow.. [17:40] eeejay_, classic [18:02] cr3, hey! I wanted to ask you how is the mago daily testing going? [18:03] ara: it won't be going for a week or two still, I need to work on other priorities which I've confirmed with heno [18:04] cr3, and results? will there be going to the certification site? [18:05] ara: yep, and we'll be opening up the certification site gradually to show the community the latest results every day [18:05] ara: if we define the output of mago as an attachment to the test results, you'll be able to download a bunch of test results at once within a single zip file [20:44] fader_: FYI, I never was able to get your checkbox bzr branch to run the glibc test... but checkbox generally seems to hate me. [20:46] sbeattie: Heh, cr3 put some hidden code in there... if ($USERNAME == 'sbeattie') be_evil(); [20:47] sbeattie: To be more serious, I haven't looked at it in a bit but I will put it back on my list. I believe schwuk is going to be working on checkbox tests as of next week as well, so maybe we can get some help from him if I can't get it working for you. [20:48] sbeattie: what seems to be the problem? [20:49] cr3: Almost certainly stuff I did :/ [20:52] sbeattie: seriously, if I could be of assistance, let me know [21:06] cr3: mostly my issue is with figuring out how to get it to run correctly in place out of bzr branchs without installing into the system locations. [21:37] sbeattie: "in place out of bzr branchs"? and, without installing what into the system locations? [21:38] (sorry for the lag, been hopping in and out of the lab) [21:39] checkbox; e.g. I want to bzr co testbranches to hack on, without having to install things into /usr and /etc [21:40] which I'm sure is possible, I just haven't figured out the right magic to do it. [21:40] sbeattie: just to be clear, do you want to: 1. checkout testbranches of checkbox itself and run it from the source tree? or, 2. write a plugin in checkbox which checkouts testbranches of some test suite? [21:41] 1. [21:41] sbeattie: bzr branch lp:checkbox; cd checkbox; sudo ./bin/checkbox-gtk [21:41] sbeattie: let me know if that doesn't work [21:42] when I've done that in the past, it never seems to honor suites I've added. [21:42] (to the local bzr tree) [21:42] sbeattie: ok, so I misunderstood the problem then, I thought you couldn't run checkbox from the source directory [21:43] sbeattie: if the problem is that checkbox doesn't recognize new suites, might you happen to have a sample suite which didn't work? [21:44] there should be no magic, you should just be able to drop your suite into the suites directory and be done [21:44] if there is magic necessary, then that's a bug [21:44] in the suites directory in the bzr tree, or the one in /usr/share/checkbox/suites [21:44] ? [21:45] I never got the former to work, even with simple /bin/true testcases. [21:45] sbeattie: if you're running checkbox from the bzr tree, in the bzr tree. if you're running checkbox from the system, in the system /usr/share/... directory. it should be logical [21:46] right, running from the bzr tree + adding suites to the bzr tree never worked for me. [21:46] sbeattie: your expectations were correct then, if you were working from the bzr tree, you should indeed expect that dropping new suites in that directory should work [21:46] sbeattie: "might you happen to have a sample suite which didn't work?" [21:47] sbeattie: I've made plenty of demonstrations to people from the source tree and dropping new suites, so perhaps there was a problem in the formatting of the suites file [21:55] lemme dig one up, it's been a while. But I'm also unclear as to how to use the additional checkbox bzr trees (checkbox-certification, etc.) in conjunction with either the system checkbox or a bzr checkout. [21:57] sbeattie: using checkbox-* in conjunction with checkbox becomes a bit complicated because, if you also want to use the bzr tree of checkbox and you're working on checkbox-compatibility for example, then you have to set environment variables such as CHECKBOX_DATA and CHECKBOX_SHARE [22:01] cr3: okay, yay, must have been operator error, the dropin thing is working. [22:02] cr3: but documenting which env variables to set in the checkbox-* case would be helpful. === fader_ is now known as fader|away