| maxb | ttx: Hello. Do you know of any Debian documentation that I can reference when filing a bug on a Debian package requesting they change Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk because they do not build any -gcj packages? | 07:50 |
|---|---|---|
| maxb | I have asked debian-java@ but no one has replied conclusively | 07:50 |
| ttx | maxb: let me see | 07:51 |
| maxb | I have been unable to find anything other than wiki.ubuntu.com documentation on what the intended difference between default-jdk and default-jdk-builddep is. | 07:52 |
| ttx | there was a debian metabug filed by doko explaining this | 07:53 |
| ttx | I just need to find it :) | 07:53 |
| maxb | aha | 07:53 |
| maxb | Unless I fail to drive the BTS right, it's not on java-common :-/ | 07:53 |
| ttx | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526273 | 07:54 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 526273 in c3p0 "c3p0: removal of java-gcj-compat" [Important,Closed] | 07:54 |
| ttx | "default-jdk-builddep should be used if the package builds | 07:54 |
| ttx | native code built with gcj." | 07:54 |
| ttx | that's hardly a policy document, but all I've seen so far on the subject were recommendations from doko | 07:55 |
| ttx | also there was a ubuntu-devel-announce post explaining the default-java stuff | 07:56 |
| ttx | but that's Ubuntu policy, not a good rationale for a Debian bug. | 07:56 |
| ttx | maxb: ^ | 07:57 |
| maxb | Alright. At least it's a statement by the uploader of Debian's java-common, so I guess that's official enough | 07:59 |
| maxb | thanks | 07:59 |
| ttx | maxb: you're welcome | 07:59 |
| drubin | Hi I have a quick question, Is there a reason when we package the ia32-java-6-sun we don't have a sym link to the sudo ln -s ../java-6-sun/lib/ lib | 09:42 |
| drubin | I have a meeting now, But just thought I would ask before reporting a bug. | 09:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!