[07:50] <maxb> ttx: Hello. Do you know of any Debian documentation that I can reference when filing a bug on a Debian package requesting they change Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk because they do not build any -gcj packages?
[07:50] <maxb> I have asked debian-java@ but no one has replied conclusively
[07:51] <ttx> maxb: let me see
[07:52] <maxb> I have been unable to find anything other than wiki.ubuntu.com documentation on what the intended difference between default-jdk and default-jdk-builddep is.
[07:53] <ttx> there was a debian metabug filed by doko explaining this
[07:53] <ttx> I just need to find it :)
[07:53] <maxb> aha
[07:53] <maxb> Unless I fail to drive the BTS right, it's not on java-common :-/
[07:54] <ttx> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526273
[07:54] <ttx> "default-jdk-builddep should be used if the package builds
[07:54] <ttx> native code built with gcj."
[07:55] <ttx> that's hardly a policy document, but all I've seen so far on the subject were recommendations from doko
[07:56] <ttx> also there was a ubuntu-devel-announce post explaining the default-java stuff
[07:56] <ttx> but that's Ubuntu policy, not a good rationale for a Debian bug.
[07:57] <ttx> maxb: ^
[07:59] <maxb> Alright. At least it's a statement by the uploader of Debian's java-common, so I guess that's official enough
[07:59] <maxb> thanks
[07:59] <ttx> maxb: you're welcome
[09:42] <drubin> Hi I have a quick question, Is there a reason when we package the ia32-java-6-sun we don't have a sym link to the  sudo ln -s ../java-6-sun/lib/ lib
[09:42] <drubin> I have a meeting now, But just thought I would ask before reporting a bug.