/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/07/17/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asac_fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/220130/00:01
asac_with all internal hidden00:01
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asachmm. there are still a few left. _ZN2v88internal19kLongLogEventsNamesE00:02
ftawhat is that?00:06
asacnm -D libv8.so00:07
asacwith all hidden00:07
asaccheck your libv8.so (if you have it)00:07
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 88706 2009-07-16 17:55 da.pak00:07
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 83692 2009-07-16 17:55 en-US.pak00:07
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74194 2009-07-16 17:55 he.pak00:07
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53338 2009-07-16 17:55 zh-TW.pak00:07
asachow many languages are there?00:07
ftaso far only 4 in my build, but there are ~50 in the source tree00:08
pace_t_zululater y'all00:10
asac50*63.333=?00:10
asac316600:11
asaci gues thats ok to put in one langpack00:11
asacchromium-browser-non-en00:11
asacchromium-browser-non-us ;)00:11
fta-l10n ?00:11
ftaor -langpacks00:12
asacfta: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-v8/chromium-v8.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/patches/hidden.patch00:13
asaccan you put that into your chromium build and see if things go mad?00:13
asacprobably need to change strip level00:14
asaci tried it and it applies against latest trunk too00:14
asacand to 1.2 branch00:14
ftahm, i will diverge at each v8 sync :S00:15
asacfta: no its just for testing00:15
asacits not ready for that00:15
asacif it works i can make it so upstreawm will take it00:15
asacjust an experiment if it blows up ;)00:15
ftai'm not fully ready for a shared build, i have a few things to fix00:24
asacfta: shared build? oh you have static v8?00:24
ftayes, told you earlier00:24
asacoh ok00:24
ftaWANT_SHARED_LIBS ?= 000:24
asaccant you selectively just enable v8?00:25
ftad'oh! difficult00:25
asacfta: do you know how i can build v8 with tests?00:26
ftamake tests :)00:27
ftalol, that's skia00:27
ftahmm, let me see00:27
ftaadd cctests to the target00:29
ftaasac, ^^ + http://code.google.com/p/v8/wiki/Testing00:30
asacok cool00:31
asacnow i found how to actually do the soname=on ;)00:31
asaci am bloody scons n00b for sure ;)00:31
asacif i just run scons it dumps the options. but it doesnt dump available targets00:32
asacerr scons --help00:32
asacdebian/tmp/usr/lib/libv8.so.1.so00:42
asac;)00:42
ftadoes it work?00:49
asacthe tests?01:03
asacno they fail to compile01:03
asacfirst fixes were similar01:03
asacbut now i have a harder problem01:03
asacwith some weird templating01:03
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/220159/01:04
asacseems easy, but i don tsee whats wrong in this case ;)01:05
asaci push hidden visibility throughout whole conversation.cc ;)01:06
asacso not sure how it can be more visible ,)01:06
ftano idea01:08
asacok seems i got it01:14
asacat least that file ;)01:15
asac[00:54|% 100|+ 427|- 399]: Done01:19
asacfta: ?01:19
asacmeans half didnt work?01:19
asacor no test worked?01:19
asac;)01:19
asacCXXFLAGS=-fno-strict-aliasing ./tools/test.py -S soname=on -S library=shared cctest/test-heap/SymbolTable01:20
asacscons: Reading SConscript files ...01:20
asacscons: done reading SConscript files.01:21
asacscons: Building targets ...01:21
asacscons: `cctests' is up to date.01:21
asacscons: done building targets.01:21
asac[00:00|% 100|+   1|-   0]: Done01:21
asactest-api is better: [00:24|% 100|+ 184|-   0]: Done01:22
* asac runs all CC tests01:22
asacfive crashes01:23
asac[00:52|% 100|+ 421|-   5]: Done > cctest01:23
asacis that normal?01:24
asacdo you have zero crashes in chromium?01:24
ftai don't run the v8 testsuite directly, so i'm not sure01:31
asacyeah01:42
asaci think the few crashes are ok01:42
asacits the mjsunit testsuite that has 100% errors01:43
asaci have to check that01:43
asachmm just running scons did trigger a rebuild for me again01:43
asacmaybe it doens like debug=on01:43
asacbefore it did incremental builds for sure01:43
asacseems just that building the tests triggers a rebuild of the real tree on its own01:45
asacgood. after creating the soname link and setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH the mjsunit tests work01:48
asacldd shell linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xf7ef9000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib32/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7eb0000) libv8.so.1 => ./libv8.so.1 (0xf7be7000)01:49
asac[04:24|% 100|+ 387|-   0]: Done01:52
asacnice01:52
kaushalhi08:55
kaushalI am running FF 3.5.1 on hardy. can i install FF 3.6 ?08:55
kaushalwill that create issues ?08:55
kaushalI have already FF 3.0.11 and FF 3.5.1 in Hardy :-)08:56
micahgnope08:56
micahgeach one should have its own profile folder08:57
kaushalmicahg: nope means i can install FF 3.6 too ?08:57
kaushalright08:57
micahgyep, sorry, it's almost 3AM here :)08:57
kaushalah you from East Coast08:58
kaushal?08:58
micahgCentral Time08:59
kaushalMozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1pre) Gecko/20090716 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Shiretoko/3.5.1pre08:59
kaushalis that a correct version ?09:00
kaushalI am running it on Ubuntu Hardy09:00
micahgwe don't have an official version of 3.5 for hardy yet09:00
micahgthat's a daily version09:00
kaushalok09:00
kaushalwhat does daily version mean ?09:01
micahgthere's a new build every day from the development brance09:01
kaushalah09:01
micahg*branch09:01
kaushalgot it09:01
micahgit's what will become 3.5.109:01
kaushalso is it safe to run on a production host ?09:01
micahgthat's up to you09:02
micahgit should be fairly stable, but no guarantees09:02
micahgif you want a stable release 3.0.11 is the best we have right now09:02
kaushalmicahg: FF 3.6 is cool09:03
kaushalit has a search for all the open windows09:03
kaushalis there a short cut key for List all tabs ?09:05
micahgidk09:13
micahgI don't use 3.609:13
* micahg is off to sleep, others will come soon09:13
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
sleeasac: hi again - had trouble connecting to freenode11:57
asachi11:58
sleeasac: re update to 3.5 - on win/mac you get given an option via the Firefox update11:58
asacslee: so what did you do? go to synaptic and install firefox-3.5 (and firefox-3.5-gnome-support)11:58
sleeso you get notified even if not monitory the news11:58
asacright. but we are delivering a complete desktop experience11:58
asaclets please not start discussing that again11:58
sleethat doesn happen at all on ubuntu11:58
sleek,11:58
sleeI just wanted ot be clear11:58
sleemy real point is how to get it to work11:59
sleeyes I did what you said11:59
* slee checks11:59
asacslee: ok. then the most likely source of confusion for you is that the firefox-3.5 package is ment to be a preview package for those folks like you that cant wait (e.g. its a special service we do for firefox). so its not replacing your ffox 3.5,12:00
asacwhat you get is that boring Shiretoko named thing in the menu. you can safely use that12:00
asachttp://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/161-FAQ-Why-is-my-firefox-3.5-still-called-Shiretoko.html12:00
asacslee: ^^12:00
sleeI have ffx 3.0.11 meta package and then I added 3.5. Nothing appeared to change12:01
asacslee: rewad what i just wrote12:01
asacread ;)12:01
asac13:00 < asac> slee: ok. then the most likely source of confusion for you is that the firefox-3.5 package is ment to be a preview package for  those folks like you that cant wait (e.g. its a special service we do for firefox). so its not replacing your ffox 3.5,12:01
asac13:00 < asac> what you get is that boring Shiretoko named thing in the menu. you can safely use that12:01
sleeoh, will look again I did try looking in the menus, when my shortcut did nothing new12:01
asac13:00 < asac> http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/161-FAQ-Why-is-my-firefox-3.5-still-called-Shiretoko.html12:01
asac13:00 < asac> slee: ^^12:01
asacyes. we didnt migrate the default. for us its a separate app until we make it the default on the desktop. the idea is that users can still keep their old firefox working and still experiment with it12:02
sleewe're getting out of sync - hold on12:02
* asac goes and makes a coffee12:03
sleeasac: OK I understand - seems I just missed the shiretoko in menu. Plus an old blog said it was very old build got me worried12:05
sleeasac: great I see Skiretoko12:06
sleebut it says 'Beta' - surely not?12:06
asacslee: thats a bug. yeah. check what is in about -> help12:06
asacunfortunately i forgot to fix that in the 3.5.1 update. but we will get 3.5.2 soon so i will fix it there now12:07
sleeasac k - can't do yet as have FFx open12:07
asacslee: 3.5.2 isnt available yet. what you can do is to enable the security testing repo12:08
asacthats basically the bits that will get rolled12:08
sleeasac can I suggest no test in synaptic for 3.5 mention the Shiretoko menu item?12:08
asacslee: not sure what you mean?12:08
asacslee: the package description?12:09
sleeyes12:09
asachmm12:09
sleecool. I also run minefield daily for bleeding edge, but like the official latest form MoCo as well for when feeling nervious12:09
sleethnaks oyu for all your help12:09
slee*you12:09
asacslee: for the short description?12:09
asacslee: we have a daily ppa too12:10
asacwith firefox 3.6 and firefox 3.5 and tbird 3.0 and others12:10
* slee check - means one in box below search list12:10
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa12:10
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa12:10
asaci would suggest that you enable both ... unless you dont want ffox 3.5 dailies too12:10
sleeasac I don't know if that is the short one12:10
asacyou can have all in parallel12:10
sleecurrently says 'safe and easy web browser from Mozilla....'12:11
asacthe profiles are not shared (e.g. they are copied the first time you run) so you wont see profile bustage12:11
asacslee: right. ok. let me think about it12:11
asacsafe and easy web browser from Mozilla - Codename: Shiretoko12:11
asacmaybe something like that12:11
asacor12:11
asacsafe and easy web browser from Mozilla known as firefox 3.5 aka Shiretoko12:12
sleeasac; thank for pointing out ppa - will save me keep clicking on help->update12:12
sleecheers12:12
asacslee: you wil get another item in the menu for firefox 3.6 called "minefield" ;)(12:12
asacslee: anyway. if you could upgrade the firefox-3.5 to the one in the security ppa that would help a lot12:13
sleeasac - just say 'intalled as Shiretoko in menus' ? or is that too variable?12:13
asacthats too long12:13
asacthe short description must not have more then 70/80 chars afaik12:13
sleeasac what does that give me again?12:13
asacslee: the security ppa? it gives you the security updates a few days ahead12:13
asace.g. after mozilla has finished pre-QA, but before they roll it officially12:14
sleeasac - ok I must be looking at the long one and it shows the short one first in the UI12:14
asacthey are usually super stable12:14
asacits just that any user using that is helpful ... if he instantly reports regressions he might see12:14
sleeasa ok security PPA it is ;-)12:14
asachere12:14
* slee adds12:14
asacthanks. then instantly upgrade so you can use 3.5.1 right away12:15
asacthanks12:15
asacslee: you on jaunty right?12:16
sleeasac thats from  shiretoko menu item right?12:16
sleeyep jaunty12:17
asacslee: what is from the shiretoko menu item?12:17
asac(slee: remember to also install firefox-3.5-gnome-support if you are running gnome ... it doesnt get automatically pulled in until we make it the default (because kde folks complained))12:18
asacslee: the upgrade you do using update-manager12:18
asacafter adding the ppa lines in software sources12:18
asacis that what you asked?12:18
asace.g. system -> administration -> software sources12:19
sleeasac - I meant how do I run the firefox form the security ppa12:19
sleeasac - that is how I added the to lines to source yes12:19
asacslee: its the same ... just add the ppa. and upgrade to latest (if you already have installed 3.5)12:19
sleegetting security error with new source on synaptic reload12:20
sleewhoops mean "signature"12:20
asacslee: right. thats because ppa keys are signed. does the upgrade work?12:20
asacsudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 7EBC211F12:21
asactry that on the command line12:21
asacthat will make the security issue go away12:21
sleerunning now12:21
asacthats for the security ppa12:21
sleetah12:21
sleeyes only using security not daily for now12:22
asac247510BE  is for daily12:22
asacok12:22
asacthe run the command above ... its also explained on the ppa page12:22
asacSigning key: ... "What is this?"12:22
sleeGeetin a message that ffx must be restarted so I need to close chatzilla12:22
sleeso it is an "upgrade" not parallel now?12:23
sleedo I need the 3.5 package as well12:23
* slee getting a little confused12:23
asacsorry. not sure. if you installed the firefox-3.5 and firefox-3.5-gnome-support packages through synpatic before12:24
asacjust upgrading will give you the right thing12:24
sleeyes i did12:24
sleek,12:24
asacand yes. you need to restart firefox12:24
asacafter the upgrade12:24
sleethanks again for all your help12:24
asacslee: you can verify that in about -> help12:24
asacthere you should see 3.5.112:24
sleeone day I like to understand what you've done with branding and XUL runner12:24
asacyes. stay in this channel and you will understand at some point12:25
asacit pops up frequently enough ;)12:25
sleeis there a web page explaining for noobs to the mysteries of pkg management?12:25
sleehehe12:25
asacxulrunner -> basically all the firefox is not firefox, but xulrunner ...12:25
asacif you build firefox on top of xulrunner it just takes 4 minutes to build12:25
asacfirefox is basically justa javascript and xml (xul)12:25
sleexull runner I know have used - but interested why you chose to use12:25
sleeany way must go now12:26
asacok cu around12:26
sleeciao12:26
asacwelcome12:26
* slee goes to enjoy ffx 3.512:26
* gnomefreak has now gotten very very pissed off12:27
gnomefreaknow my known good card has no GUI12:30
gnomefreakoh msybe i know why12:32
gnomefreakmaybe this will fix the 8400 problem (maybe == most likely not)12:33
gnomefreakasac: morning12:34
asachi gnomefreak12:34
gnomefreaki will be screwing around with getting into a GUI at least for a little while12:35
asaci feel with you ;)12:35
asacgnomefreak: do you have any xorg.conf?12:35
asaci think good way is just to move that away somewhere and see if X works perfectly without any xorg.conf (which it should nowadays)12:35
gnomefreakasac: yeah but i doubt that is why i cant get in with new card not even into bios12:36
gnomefreakits worth a shot12:36
gnomefreakok its moved the 180 drivers are installed ill be back im gonna try to restart12:38
gnomefreakok am i here12:38
gnomefreakoh hell be back12:38
asacpoor gnomefreak ;)12:41
sleeasac: hi again12:45
sleeunfortunately Shiretoko does not start12:45
sleeI get the profile manager dialog and then nothing more12:46
gnomefreaki forgot that the upstream nvidia drivers changed the xorg.conf  however my 8400 is still an issue12:54
gnomefreakasac: is tseliot still our X guy?12:55
asacslee: can you run firefox-3.5 from a console and see what you get there?12:57
sleeasac: huh! that worked and now so does the menu item13:01
sleeI wonder if it is as FFX 3.0 is also running now.13:01
sleemighty weird13:01
sleeoh no output to terminal at all - good sign13:02
gnomefreakslee: try ps aux | grep firefox if one is running you should see 2 processes13:03
gnomefreakis 2 is running you will see 313:03
gnomefreakgrep == 1 firefox entry13:03
gnomefreakbe back in a minute i hope13:03
ftaasac, damn, tb3 is stuck at b3, no b4pre now that b3 has been released. it breaks the dailies13:04
ftaasac, oh. i see, your fault13:05
asacis b3 really realeased? its just tagged aafaik13:05
gnomefreakok back to the 173 set up with upstream drivers. i really need to find out why the 8400 is not compatible with the PC13:07
sleeasac gnomefreak : all is well now with Shiretoko, very strange13:08
sleewill let you know any problems now using security ppa13:08
ftaasac, cat build-tree/mozilla/mail/config/version-191.txt13:09
fta3.0b313:09
ftacat build-tree/mozilla/mail/config/version.txt13:09
fta3.1a1pre13:09
asacyes. its +build113:09
asacits not yet out afaik13:10
ftano build* tag, just release13:10
asacfta: yeah. i think thats their build tag atm13:10
gnomefreakfta: do you have pastebin it using ubuntu pastebin?13:11
ftayes13:11
eagles0513875hey guys :)13:12
gnomefreakfta: oh wait i think i can edit this fairly easy, something is wrong with mozilla pastebin so im changing it13:12
ftagnomefreak, do you have a ~/.pastebinit.xml13:13
gnomefreakfta: but i do need to see what address you are using13:13
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com13:13
gnomefreakUnknown website, please post a bugreport to request this pastebin to be added (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com)13:13
gnomefreakoh i see13:14
ftagnomefreak, http://paste.ubuntu.com/220468/13:14
gnomefreaktftthanks removing bin from address worked13:15
gnomefreaki gueess update iso update backup than email. i just need to find a back up app that compresses the .diffs so i can save as a tar.gz instead of 35+ diffs13:17
gnomefreaks/tftthanks/fta thanks13:18
sleeasac: I have found the problem13:20
roy_hobbsis there any way to use the daily PPA for only official releases?13:20
gnomefreakroy_hobbs: no13:22
ftaroy_hobbs, no, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa is probably what you want13:22
gnomefreakthats it13:23
gnomefreakmight want to drop the edge. part13:23
roy_hobbsIt's 3.5.1 an official release?13:23
gnomefreakyes13:24
roy_hobbsoh missed it sorry13:24
gnomefreak1-2 days ago it became final13:24
gnomefreakasac: lots of sparc + hppa build failues13:25
sleeasac: fyi if I start Shiretoko with any profile other than default it fails - even creating a new one13:26
sleeI've got profiel dialog to come up every tiem I launch13:26
gnomefreakodd part as of yesterday 3.5.1 in daily isnt final13:26
sleethe error is XWindows -  The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'13:26
gnomefreak3.5.1~hg20090716r26073+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1  nevermind maybe it is13:26
sleethat's all I get in stderr13:26
sleeI have to go but will pop back Tueday or you can email me13:27
gnomefreakslee: rename your 3.5 profile and try. the default should be 3.0 IIRC13:27
sleehuh? - the i seem to be sharing same default with 3.0 and 3.513:28
asacsry on the phone13:29
sleemust go13:30
gnomefreakmaybe because you changed prefered apps?13:30
* gnomefreak be back13:30
asacfta: oh really. what did i think ;)13:38
* gnomefreak needs to check something. i cant be that stupid theres no damn way. be back13:40
asacfta: do you know how i can get a list of scons targets?14:15
asacscons --help gives me the options14:15
asace.g. library=shared etc.14:15
asacbut i cannot find how to do a scons clean ;)14:15
asacor see a list of targets available (which sounds odd because the optoin list is quite nice)14:16
* asac runs rm -r obj/14:16
asac;)14:16
asachmm. wtf is dtoa.c ;)14:19
asacah ok thats C14:21
asacmaybe using CFLAGS helps ;)14:21
eagles0513875hey guys if you need anything tested even from source let me know14:24
asaceagles0513875: you mean anything? please run the -security PPA ;)14:25
eagles0513875link me baby one more time lol14:25
asaclol14:25
asacdoesnt the awesome bar help ;)14:25
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa14:25
eagles0513875what answer bar O_O14:25
asacawesome bar14:27
asace.g. in firefox location bar just type: "-security ppa"14:27
asacif you ever visited that page it should suggest it14:27
eagles0513875gotcha14:33
eagles0513875im sshed into my linux box atm14:33
eagles0513875and putty decided to crash when i was modifying the sources list or at least trying to with kate14:33
ftaasac, depends on how the scons rules file was made; it may or may not list the targets :P14:40
* eagles0513875 is getting upset at putty14:48
asacfta: heh. ok. so is there any clean in google projects?14:53
asacfta: anyway. what i really wanted to ask is where to best put something that creates headers before the build starts14:54
asacat best only on gcc archs14:54
asacin SConsscript14:54
asaci guess chromium already does a bunch of pre-shuffeling bits. the v8 script is to simplish and doesnt do anthing like that14:54
eagles0513875how can import the pgp key for the repo u linked me to asac15:09
asac13:21 < asac> sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 7EBC211F15:10
asaceagles0513875: ^^15:10
eagles0513875ty asac:)15:10
ftachromium has gyp creating the scons files from a bunch of template, but there's a bug pending as they store those files in the source tree, which is not ideal for devs as they have to ignre those in their commits, so no real solution so far15:10
ftatemplateS15:10
asacfta: hmm.15:12
asacfta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/220553/15:13
asacat best even only if the target file does not yet exist15:13
eagles0513875ssh (putty) + xmig :) best way to test stuff out :)15:13
eagles0513875*xming15:13
ftaasac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1592415:13
asachmm. i dont want to use gyp15:14
ftaasac, "#°/bin/sh" ??15:14
asacheh15:14
asaci ran it with sh only ;)15:14
ftalooks like a temporary hack to me, they probably want to do that once, and maintain their files properly15:15
asaci have that feeling that that single line would require quite a lot of python code ;)15:15
asacyeah. then one can keep such a script for maintenance15:15
asacok. i will submit with that file attached and let them tell me what to do15:16
ftagood15:16
ftahmm. i thought chromium had upstream the gyp files in v8 already..15:17
eagles0513875asac: :) upgrading files atm using apt-build15:17
asacfta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/220554/15:17
ftai will ask, PDT time15:18
asacso you can use shlibtype=default or =hidden15:18
asacworks great here ;)15:18
asaci am happy15:18
asacthere is some cruft in it which should go to a different patch15:18
asacalso the gcc 44 detection is non existing15:18
asacso one has to set GCC_VERSION=44 in env15:18
ftais -fno-strict-aliasing really needed for everything, i thought it was just needed for dtoa..15:19
asacno its needed for everything.15:19
asacit fails right on the first .cc file too15:19
asaci think you are running Wno-error now ;)15:20
asacbut that will go to a different patch if they want it15:20
asaclet me check if symbolic-functions also works15:20
asactoo bad that i am not working on a git-svn checkout15:24
asacmaybe i should rather get one before i go crazy because of svn15:24
ftayou can sure do it for chromium, so should not be a problem for v8 either15:24
ftaasac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/UsingGit15:25
asacyeah. except that v8 will not bust up my precious storage on my sources partition ;)15:25
asacyeah i know git-svn pretty well15:25
ftayou probably don't know cl ;)15:26
asacthere is no v8 on git.chromium.org15:26
asacanyway git-svn started. i think thats good enough for now15:27
asacmore than 370 revisions still to import ;)15:27
asacyeah git cl i dont know15:27
asachttp://code.google.com/p/v8/wiki/UsingGit15:28
asacso i am doing the right thing ;)15:28
asacgreat15:28
ftahm, is there a policy for /etc/default/ ?15:47
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
ftai wonder if i should source /etc/default/chromium-browser in my launcher, or ship it in a new /etc/chromium-browser or something else..15:49
ftaasac, ^^15:50
asaci think /etc/default is only used for initscripts15:52
asacfor global configs use /etc/$pkgname15:53
asacyou could also say /etc/chromium/browser/15:53
asacyou could also say /etc/chromium/v8/15:53
asacetc.15:53
asacto allow other chromium- packages share the tree15:53
asacoh. btw. there is no git cl package15:54
asacits odd. the complete testcases suddenly started to work in the same v8 tree ;)16:08
ftai don't think v8 should be jailed to chromium16:13
asacjailed?16:13
fta /etc/chromium/v8/16:13
asacwell. its chromium-v816:13
asacthats the package name16:13
asacso either its /etc/chromium-bprwser + -v8/ (if there are any settings at all) or it would be /etc/chromium/...16:13
asaci just think that the chromium project could share directory16:14
asacinstead of creating them on their own16:14
rhollencamphey can somebody download this html file (http://pastebin.com/d44a0e47b) and tell me if it renders correctly for them? it works fine in IE6 running under wine but not firefox 3.0 or 3.516:14
asacwell.16:14
asacno need to16:14
asacie6 renders crap16:15
asacso its almost certainly not ffox problem16:15
asacif opera and chromium also render it like IE then yes.16:15
asacplease check that16:15
asachttp://acid3.acidtests.org/16:17
ftaasac, maybe we should rename the src package to just v816:17
asacrhollencamp: ^^ run that in IE6 and ffox  and other browsers16:17
PiciIs FF 3.5.1 heading to the repositories at any point in time? I don't care when just as long as I have some answer to tell these people who for some reason want the latest and greatest (sorry, a bit annoyed at those people today)16:17
asacfta: yes we can do that ;)16:17
rhollencampopera renders my test doc fine16:17
asacfta: unless its a trademark (which it isafaik)16:17
ftaasac, eh?16:17
asacv816:18
asac(TM)16:18
ftaasac, so what?16:18
asacyou cant name the chromium browser chrome ... i woulld think that taking the pure "v8" name would be proper16:18
asacunless without getting ack from upstream to use it16:18
ftadebian started with just v8, and we have tons of other apps doing that, imho, you're getting chilly for nothing16:20
* asac is like a whipped dog if it comes to trademarks + FOSS ;)16:20
asacok. we can of course go the "until they complain" path16:21
ftaasac, "you cant name the chromium browser chrome" => true but why would i want to do that? it's not the same product16:21
asacok ok ...16:22
* asac gets brave again ;)16:22
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/220616/ ?16:23
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/220617/ for the full thing16:23
asacfta: why the "default" at all? does that refer to a certain profile?16:23
asacoh16:24
asac;)16:24
ftaasac, mostly because of this: http://codereview.chromium.org/14957016:24
asaci find it strange that i cannot see the diff directly on that page16:25
fta"download raw patch"16:25
asaci want to see all side by side16:26
ftafile by file then16:26
ftaor file a bug :)16:26
asaci dont see CHROMIUM_FLAGS specifically referred to16:27
asacin that patch16:27
ftaI don't want to add --enable-plugins in the PPA builds, but i want to make it easy to power users to do it, through an env var or that default file16:27
asac(in both patches actually)16:27
ftalook at *my* patch16:28
asacok so you need more code. ok16:28
asacyour patch only sets and sources it16:28
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/220616/16:28
asacbut doesnt use it16:28
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/220617/16:28
asacheh16:28
asacdouble poster16:28
asacok16:28
* asac the one who never looks back16:29
asacfta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/220631/16:46
asacwonder if thats a gcc bug16:46
asacfor me it doesnt make much sense at least ;)16:46
ftahm16:49
ftaask doko16:49
asacsure. but he is not online16:50
asacbut i guess he doesnt know16:50
asacif i dont get reply on twitter i will send a mail to gcc list16:50
ftaSEAMONKEY_2_0b1_BUILD116:53
ftaand THUNDERBIRD_3_0b3_RELEASE (again)16:53
micahgasac: can you look at bug 40055517:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 400555 in firefox-3.0 "package firefox-3.0 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating directory `./usr/lib/firefox-3.0.11/components': No such file or directory" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40055517:05
micahgI added a note about the ff3.5 bug that's similar17:05
ftaasac, lol https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2009-07-21/PreviousVersionBugs most of the bugs are for you ;)17:59
bmhmhi there18:12
bmhmasac, I finally subscribed you to that global menu issue18:15
bmhmbut on google code (upstream), you have to subscribe yourself18:16
=== Paddy_NI_ is now known as Paddy_NI
kristinadoes anyone know why js_RegExpClass is defined in /usr/include/xulrunner-1.9/unstable/jsregexp.h, but not in the libmozjs.so it generates?19:58
asacbmhm: whats the upstreawm url?20:22
asackristina: usually unstable are only unfrozen elements20:22
asacbut it might be a bug.20:22
micahgasac: can you look at bug 40055520:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 400555 in firefox-3.0 "package firefox-3.0 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: error creating directory `./usr/lib/firefox-3.0.11/components': No such file or directory" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40055520:27
asacmicahg: yeah already looked20:31
asacnot exaclty sure why we see that20:31
asacthe other was ok20:31
asacbut that one ... no idea20:31
asaci think we hsould just properly test for the dir before touching20:31
asacthen we can avoid this20:31
micahgit's not the same cause as the one you fixed for 3.5?20:31
asacremind me tomorrow or so20:32
asachabve to run (friday night)20:32
micahgok, I won't be on till Sunday20:32
asacmaybe the 3.5 didnt fix it completely20:32
micahgwell, 3.5's a different package20:32
micahgthis was for 3.020:32
asacmicahg: thats ok i thik.20:32
asacright. but we should do the same everywhere i guess20:32
micahgI'll poke you Sunday :)20:32
asacanyway ... off!20:32
micahgindeed20:32
asacthanks! enjoy your weekend too20:32
micahgyou too20:32
kristinaasac: thanks20:51
ftaasac, why does ff 3.0 open the profile manager on 1st run now (after an upgrade)?21:21
eagles0513875hey guys hows firefox 3.5 looking21:37
admaiaasac, podes ajudar-me? estou estou à toa com o Flash, não tenho som depois de instalar o firefox 3.521:39
micahgasac isn't here right now21:47
admaiaok, gracias21:49
bmhmasac, I linked the upstream url in launchpads bug report.22:19
bmhmasac, http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/issues/detail?id=46222:20
ftamozilla 49354123:00
ubottuMozilla bug 493541 in jemalloc "jemalloc integration cause crashes when libraries or plugins dlopen with RTLD_DEEPBIND" [Critical,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49354123:00
LLStarksasac23:07
LLStarksyo23:07
ftajdstrand, is the security team taking care of the ia32-libs package?23:19
ftajdstrand, <evmar> fta: % strings /usr/lib32/libpng12.so | grep 'libpng version' | head -1 libpng version 1.2.15beta5 - December 8, 200623:23
ftajdstrand, and looking at http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html it doesn't look good23:24
jdstrandfta: ia32-libs is in universe on hardy and later and is community supported23:24
ftad'oh!23:24
jdstrandfta: we'd be happy to process debdiffs though23:24
jdstrandfta: I'm actually heading out, feel free to comment in the bug23:25
ftanoway for this package, that will be a hundreds-MB binary diff23:25
jdstrandfta: if their is a better solution, we can consider it23:26
ftathe src package in karmic is over 700MB23:26
ftajust a sync with the build-in script, assuming hardy's png is correct23:27
fta!info libpng12-0 hardy23:27
ubottulibpng12-0 (source: libpng): PNG library - runtime. In component main, is optional. Version 1.2.15~beta5-3ubuntu0.1 (hardy), package size 184 kB, installed size 360 kB23:27
fta!info libpng12-0 hardy-security23:28
ubottu'hardy-security' is not a valid distribution: dapper, dapper-backports, hardy, hardy-backports, intrepid, intrepid-backports, jaunty, jaunty-backports, karmic, karmic-backports, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, medibuntu, partner23:28
fta!info libpng12-0 hardy-backports23:28
ubottuPackage libpng12-0 does not exist in hardy-backports23:28
ftawell, *sigh*23:28
ftai was trying to convince google to use more system libs, they pointed me to this :(23:29
reed_fta: they should just use mozilla's libpng23:46
reed_it's optimized, and it includes APNG!23:46
reed_:)23:46
ftareed_, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=117123:47
ftareed_, "The versions of the patches in Mozilla's Bugzilla are stale WRT the current libpng releases."23:48
reed_eh, I doubt that23:50
reed_Glenn is pretty good about keeping us up-to-date23:50
reed_mozilla bug 50480523:51
ubottuMozilla bug 504805 in ImageLib "Update libpng to version 1.2.38" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50480523:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!