[01:16] <fta> asac, funny.. http://codereview.chromium.org/155558
[01:16] <BUGabundo> linux: add flash workarounds
[01:16] <BUGabundo> there goes QT and KDE
[01:16] <BUGabundo> This adds a few workarounds for Flash bugs on linux, hooking gtk and X
[01:21] <fta> chromium uses gtk, not qt, so what?
[01:21] <BUGabundo> nothing nothing
[01:22] <fta> reed_, http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=contentLoadURL  is it true or false by default?
[01:55]  * BUGabundo stolen from @yofel: gn folks [mv /dev/awake /dev/bed]
[10:36] <nikolam> asac, hi
[10:36] <nikolam> Why Seamonkey 1.1.17 is declined for Hardy/LTS?
[10:37] <nikolam> I made it yesterday from source found in Gnomefreak`s PPA and it works fine, now. Even got 64-bit enigmail done.
[10:38] <gnomefreak> micahg: he hasnt pushed it to any repo yet
[10:38] <gnomefreak> oops
[10:38] <micahg> :)
[10:38] <micahg> hi gnomefreak
[10:38] <gnomefreak> nikolam: it hasnt been pushed and i have it built in PPA already for karmic iirc but its on his list to push
[10:38] <gnomefreak> micahg: hi sorry for the ping ;)
[10:40] <gnomefreak> nikolam: i stay on top of seamonkey normally its packaged within a week of release. now sunbird is a diffferent story i try to stay on top of it but that doesnt happen alot of times they are the 2 main projects i maintain
[10:41] <nikolam> great. I am already using it, I compiled from source/patch you provided, looks fine on Hardy 64bit :)
[10:41] <nikolam> I some testing is needed..
[10:41] <gnomefreak> nikolam: enigmail is a mess it needs to be redone but we havent gotten to it
[10:42] <gnomefreak> nikolam: i have locale builds for all supported versions and testing atleast on 32bit has been sucessful
[10:42] <nikolam> I made enigmail, too, There is some manual on enigmail forum I followed. it works on 64-bit SM
[10:42] <nikolam> 64-bit works here
[10:42] <gnomefreak> i can build it fine from .xpi however we really need to fix the whole package for repos
[10:42] <nikolam> Can I help testing releases of SM, etc,
[10:43] <nikolam> I can Use Vm`s also and native install of Karmic
[10:44] <gnomefreak> nikolam: sure i push them to PPA when im done with them. seamonkey2 is fairly old and that is due to problem with mozilla-devscripts once i get latest tarball i will fix the patching issue and start again on it
[10:44] <gnomefreak> installing SM2 should work from my PPA but i dont remember what versions i built for. it says failed but it should use last sucessful build
[10:45] <nikolam> gnomefreak, I just had some problems with 1.1.15 available in your ppa, i think, it wasn`t working with some extensions. After instaling from repos, it worked. i had to remove your ppa from repos list .
[10:45] <nikolam> I installed SM2 from ppa :)
[10:45] <nikolam> and it is working here on hardy/64
[10:46] <gnomefreak> nikolam: its better to not have my PPA in sources list since they are my main testing packages 1.1.17 should have fixed the extension issues
[10:46] <nikolam> I am now on 1.1.17 so I think it is safe to re-enable Ppa
[10:46] <nikolam> ok man
[10:46] <nikolam> So, can I help testing and how would be best?
[10:47] <gnomefreak> nikolam: i suggest just getting the .deb from PPA but most packages at this time should be safe
[10:48] <gnomefreak> i have 2-3 more bugs to work out in sunbird and i can finall be done with that :)
[10:48] <nikolam> i use sunbird.
[10:48] <nikolam> so i should download sunbird from your PPA and give it a test?
[10:49] <gnomefreak> maybe i can drop the whole convert part of rules
[10:49] <gnomefreak> nikolam: sunbird i fixed a few things already just working on icon bug and build-dep bug
[10:49] <gnomefreak> nikolam: sunbird is safe as it is
[10:49] <nikolam> I am capable producing .debs if I have .dsc and sources
[10:49] <gnomefreak> it will be getting updated when i get a chance
[10:50] <nikolam> so i can make it on fly for hardy for testing
[10:50] <gnomefreak> PPA's do it for you :)
[10:51] <gnomefreak> once i get a chance to fix the rest of bugs i will push to PPA. monday i wont be here unless its for a few minutes and the full week of 27th i wont be here
[10:52] <nikolam> where do i post responces for testing and what to look for while testing
[10:52]  * gnomefreak should really talk to mvo about this apt bug
[10:52] <micahg> gnomefreak: seems like asac forgot about bug 365965 when he released ff3.5.1
[10:52] <gnomefreak> nikolam: you can post them to the mailing list (see topic) or you can email me
[10:53] <nikolam> great gnome
[10:53] <gnomefreak> micahg: yeah i marked a bug invalid this morning because it was already filed. i will look at it if i am up in a bit
[10:54] <micahg> people keep commenting, I was thinking to clean up the description with one of those DO NOT POST UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO ADD type of thing
[10:54] <micahg> sorry for caps, but appropriate :)
[10:55] <nikolam> gnomefreak, it only bugs me asac marked rejected SM 1.1.17 for hardy/interpid?
[10:55] <gnomefreak> i will look at it and provide a diff on the bug
[10:55] <gnomefreak> nikolam: do you have a bug #
[10:55] <micahg> ok, thanks :)
[10:55] <micahg> I guess I probably oculd do that too...
[10:55] <nikolam> 356274
[10:56] <gnomefreak> micahg: once i start it will take all of 3 minutes :)
[10:57] <micahg> ok, then you do it :)
[10:57] <micahg> it'll take me more than that
[10:57] <micahg> I've got about 60 bugs waiting on responses from me...
[10:57] <gnomefreak> :)
[10:57] <micahg> and I still need sleep
[10:58] <micahg> how ya doin BTW...
[10:58] <gnomefreak> maybe a bit longer. looking to see what he has done with this
[10:59] <nikolam> gnomefreak, 356274
[11:00] <gnomefreak> bug 356274
[11:01] <nikolam> yup declined for hardy/interpid
[11:04] <gnomefreak> nikolam: ok if i see him i will remind him
[11:05] <gnomefreak> micahg: Suggests: ubufox  in firefox-3.0
[11:05] <gnomefreak> ah 3.5 needs to be moved
[11:06] <micahg> yeah, I think he fixed 3.0
[11:06] <micahg> 3.0.12 seems to suggest now
[11:06] <micahg> no, 3.0.11 was also suggest
[11:07] <gnomefreak> ok im grabbing 3.5 source atm so it will be a bit
[11:07] <micahg> I think asac's dream is to recommend
[11:07] <micahg> but unless we can uncouple ubufox from all the gnome deps, we can't
[11:07] <gnomefreak> we tried that and it caused problems so i will do it and see what he thinks
[11:08] <micahg> yeah, that can be for later
[11:08] <micahg> right now, if we just move from recommend to suggest, most of the people will stop complaining
[11:10] <micahg> and someone just opened anoth bug for it...
[11:12] <gnomefreak> micahg: working on it and i should have debdiff in the next 2 or so hours. shit!!
[11:14] <micahg> wow
[11:15] <micahg> I duped the bug
[11:18] <gnomefreak> ok grabbed wrong version :( i think i know the icon bug in sunbird i hope
[11:43] <gnomefreak> micahg: uploaded .debdiff to bug
[11:58] <gnomefreak> bug 339400
[11:58] <gnomefreak> huh
[11:59] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightning-sunbird/+bug/399400
[12:00] <gnomefreak> oh damn
[12:03] <gnomefreak> eh should fix branch anyway
[12:13]  * gnomefreak really should have taken the day off
[12:14] <BUGabundo> hey gnomefreak
[12:14] <gnomefreak> hi BUGabundo
[12:15] <gnomefreak> ok pushing sunbird for testing icon bug than i guess later this week fix my branch
[12:43] <gnomefreak> check email once more than im gone
[13:02] <BUGabundo> fta: where do you have the docs for your PPA bots?
[13:57] <fta> BUGabundo, why?
[13:59] <BUGabundo> fta for #exaile guys to put a daily ppa
[13:59] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/401367
[13:59] <BUGabundo> errrr
[13:59] <BUGabundo> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+junk/ppa-scripts
[13:59] <BUGabundo> found it here
[14:42] <fta> yes
[15:01] <fta> BUGabundo, send them here if they need help
[15:24] <e-jat> !ping asac
[15:33] <BUGabundo> ahah
[15:35] <e-jat> BUGabundo: any idea with this bug 371890
[15:37] <BUGabundo> ME ME ME
[15:37] <BUGabundo> grrr
[15:37] <BUGabundo> I can't remove mine
[15:37] <BUGabundo> wait that
[15:38] <e-jat> u also cant remove?
[15:39] <BUGabundo> nope
[15:40] <BUGabundo> and I'm on karmic
[15:45] <e-jat> me too
[15:46] <BUGabundo> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
[15:46] <BUGabundo>   flashplugin-installer
[15:46] <BUGabundo> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
[15:46] <BUGabundo> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
[15:46] <BUGabundo> Setting up flashplugin-installer (10.0.22.87ubuntu2) ...
[15:46] <BUGabundo> cd: 143: can't cd to /var/cache/flashplugin-installer
[15:46] <BUGabundo> dpkg: error processing flashplugin-installer (--configure):
[15:46] <BUGabundo>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
[15:46] <BUGabundo> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
[15:46] <BUGabundo> A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
[15:47] <e-jat> hope there will someone to look at it .. or else .. im stuck with any other package..
[15:48] <BUGabundo> not here
[15:48] <BUGabundo> e-jat: $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
[15:50] <e-jat> BUGabundo: http://paste.ubuntu.com/221982/
[15:50] <e-jat> is it ok ?
[15:51] <e-jat> BUGabundo: thanks a lot :)
[15:51] <BUGabundo> yeah that's what I get
[15:52] <e-jat> my flash work
[15:52] <BUGabundo> you don't have much holding on it
[15:52] <BUGabundo> you are fine
[15:52] <e-jat> again ..
[15:52] <e-jat> :)
[15:53] <e-jat> 1 not fully installed or removed. <-- its ok .. ill try to ignore before it going to be fix
[15:54] <BUGabundo> yeah
[15:54] <BUGabundo> been doing that for 2 daus
[15:54] <e-jat> going out for a while .. see ya in a few hour ..
[15:54] <BUGabundo> darn asac when on vacation :(
[15:54] <e-jat> owh .. no wonder ..
[15:55] <e-jat> asac: is on vacation ..
[15:55] <e-jat> we will raise to him when he coming back from vacation :)
[15:55] <e-jat> gtg ... c ya in a short while ..
[15:58] <fta> !info adobe-flashplugin
[15:58] <fta> !info adobe-flashplugin karmic
[15:58] <fta> !info adobe-flashplugin karmicccc
[15:58] <fta> !info adobe-flashplugin partner
[15:59] <BUGabundo> fta ahahahahahaha
[15:59] <fta> partner, so adobe broke it
[15:59] <BUGabundo> I guess so
[15:59] <fta> -2intrepid1? lol
[16:00] <fta> Only available for i386 lpia, pfff
[16:01] <BUGabundo> eeheeh
[17:54] <BUGabundo> fta darn
[17:55] <BUGabundo> I can't get some food, and get ahead of me ?!
[17:55] <BUGabundo> :))
[18:36] <micahg> ping asac
[18:38] <BUGabundo> not here
[18:38] <BUGabundo> MIA all weekeng
[18:38] <BUGabundo> I think he went on vacations and forgot to let us know
[18:38] <micahg> I was afraid of that, ok it'll wait till tomorrow
[18:44] <fta> [Fri 17 21:32] <asac> habve to run (friday night)
[18:45] <BUGabundo> fta he must be reaching grece by now, if he is still running :)
[18:45] <micahg> yeah, I was here then :)
[18:47]  * fta turning the TV on to see if asac is in the news..
[18:49] <BUGabundo> ahahhahahahahaahhaaahahhaahhaahahahahahahaaahahh
[19:06] <FirstSgt> is it possible to get FF 3.5 for ubuntu (64)
[19:08] <micahg> FirstSgt: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion
[19:08] <BUGabundo> FirstSgt: I'm running it
[19:08] <BUGabundo> even running FF 3.6
[19:09] <FirstSgt> cool, i have firefox-3.6
[19:09] <FirstSgt> s/6/5/g
[19:10] <BUGabundo> FirstSgt: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[19:10] <FirstSgt> i've just totally 100% ditched Microsoft in all ways shapes and forms on all of the office computers.
[19:10] <micahg> BUGabundo: we're not pushing that if people want stable
[19:10] <BUGabundo> ok
[19:11] <BUGabundo> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa
[19:11] <BUGabundo> better micahg?
[19:11] <micahg> mozilla-security ppa if they're willing to take a little risk and get the updates first
[19:11] <micahg> a little
[19:11] <BUGabundo> it was what I had on hand !
[19:11] <micahg> there's still some risk involved
[19:11] <micahg> that has to be explain
[19:11] <micahg> *explained
[19:11] <micahg> cool FirstSgt
[19:12] <FirstSgt> nice.  I think this should work.
[19:12] <FirstSgt> I was very concerned about the FF 3.5 exploit found on milworm.  does that shell code apply to linux versions as well?
[19:13] <micahg> idk, but 3.5.1 is already in the repos
[19:13] <FirstSgt> hopefully fixed
[19:13] <micahg> yes, indeed
[19:14] <FirstSgt> very scary someone can write javascript that can overflow the browser and create user accounts.
[19:14] <FirstSgt> then use cross-site-scripting exploits on thousands of other sites to implement it
[19:16] <FirstSgt> since our company uses a lot of open source (we donate a lot too :)), I check the exploit sites every day.  I found it a lot safer than running MS based products like sharepoint (the cost to update is insane so small businesses stay at the lower (exploitable) versions).
[19:16] <FirstSgt> but thanks for your help guys.
[19:16] <micahg> np
[19:48] <fta> damn, i've posted chromium twice
[19:53] <BUGabundo> fta where?
[19:57] <fta> ppa
[19:57] <fta> BUGabundo, https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/
[20:00]  * BUGabundo presses cancel button
[20:51] <FirstSgt> okay, so now that i've updated no pages show up.  it says firefox is in offline mode
[20:51] <FirstSgt> how can i change this?
[20:51] <bluekuja> asac, hello
[20:51] <micahg> File menu?
[20:54] <FirstSgt> wow
[20:54] <FirstSgt> thanks
[21:01] <micahg> np
[21:03] <BUGabundo> FirstSgt: File> Offline
[21:03] <BUGabundo> bluekuja: asac is MIA
[21:03] <bluekuja> BUGabundo, since when?
[21:03] <BUGabundo> since Friday
[21:03] <bluekuja> he left his house then for the weekend
[21:07] <BUGabundo> :\
[22:23] <micahg1> FirstSgt: I didn't see the second post on slashdot
[22:29] <fta> ?
[22:31] <micahg> http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-2479
[22:31] <reed_> it's all garbage
[22:31] <reed_> it's a non-exploitable DoS
[22:31] <reed_> nobody actually took the time to ask Mozilla about it
[22:31] <micahg> ah, ok
[22:32] <reed_> we're posting a blog post soon
[22:32] <micahg> reed_: are you the official mozilla guy here?
[22:32] <reed_> mozilla bug 504342
[22:32] <reed_> I am one Mozilla guy here.
[22:32] <BUGabundo> micahg: he is
[22:32] <reed_> there are others
[22:32] <micahg> well, I'm opening a bug in our tracker as well
[22:33] <reed_> ok, you can link it to the bug I posted above
[22:33] <micahg> yep, thanks :)
[22:35] <micahg> so would this be low importance?
[22:38] <reed_> yes
[22:39] <reed_> it's just a DoS
[22:40] <BUGabundo> eheh _just_ lol
[22:43] <micahg> reed_: what about this one: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-2478
[22:44] <micahg> was that already fixed in 3.5.1?
[22:46] <reed_> no
[22:46] <reed_> not fixed yet... it's just a DoS, too
[22:46] <micahg> ok, so I'll open an issue for that too
[22:46] <micahg> is the private bug, the one in progress?
[22:46] <micahg> and the one I should link to?
[22:47] <reed_> CVE-2009-2478 maps to mozilla bug 502648
[22:47] <micahg> ok
[22:50] <reed__> http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/19/milw0rm-9158-stack-overflow-crash-not-exploitable-cve-2009-2479/
[22:50] <reed_> micahg: ^
[22:51] <micahg> thanks
[22:51] <micahg> I just read it
[22:55] <micahg> and I just posted the other CVE to ff 3,5
[23:25] <fta> asac, http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/ffmpeg/README.chromium :(
[23:26] <fta> that part: "The following flags are used for Google Chrome, which also include non-free decoders (H.264, AAC and MP3)"
[23:30] <BUGabundo> fta do you really think asac log will be all that big ?? eheh
[23:32] <fta> he often reads the logs directly posted to him, so maybe. so far, it still fits in my scrollbar (oldest entry is Fri 15:33)
[23:35] <BUGabundo> ok
[23:36] <reed_> fta: re your question -- did you get an answer?
[23:36] <reed_> or do I need to ask?
[23:37] <BUGabundo> fta so what's app with chromium codecs?
[23:37] <fta> reed_, hm, which question?
[23:37] <fta> BUGabundo, what's app? can't parse that
[23:37] <reed_> [17:22:40] <fta> reed_, http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=contentLoadURL  is it true or false by default?
[23:38] <fta> reed_, i guessed it's enabled by default but the link gives a confusing result
[23:38] <BUGabundo>  fta: so that's it, Google Chrome and Chromium will diverge /wrt the list of audio/video codecs.. :( http://is.gd/1Eyi1  *sigh*
[23:38] <fta> BUGabundo, what's your question?
[23:40] <fta> BUGabundo, Chromium has ogg, vorbis and theora, Google Chrome has that + H.264, AAC and MP3 which are non-free
[23:41] <BUGabundo> ahh right
[23:41] <BUGabundo> though so
[23:41] <BUGabundo> but distros already have that right?
[23:41] <BUGabundo> I'll be able to play mp3 and h264 on it?
[23:42] <fta> nope, not until i change something
[23:42] <BUGabundo> oopss
[23:47] <fta> i can make chromium depend on chromium-codecs | chromium-codecs-nonfree with the latter in multiverse or something like that (but ppa and multiverse; no idea...)