[01:51] <Sarvatt> ugh... found out what my problem was compiling xserver. nasty http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536034
[01:51] <ubottu> Debian bug 536034 in dpkg-dev "dpkg-dev: dpkg-gensymbols produces broken symbols files" [Serious,Closed]
[01:52] <Sarvatt> http://groups.google.se/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/dfcd924e8426179b?fwc=1
[01:52] <Sarvatt> guess ubuntu hasnt picked that up yet
[01:58] <Sarvatt> ahh it is there, no clue why i'm still getting the errors
[09:45] <dfaure> after switching to ati (because fglrx stopped working in jaunty), X starts up but no keyboard and no mouse. Any suggestions?
[09:46] <Ng> is hald running?
[09:47] <dfaure> no indeed. I see. Should reboot out of failsafe mode first.
[09:47] <Ng> (xorg gets its input devices from hal atm)
[09:50] <dfaure> err now every key sends three letters !?
[09:50] <dfaure> I type 'd' and I see "ddd"
[09:51] <dfaure> anyone seen that before?
[09:51] <Ng> do you have any input devices defined in /etc/X11/xorg.conf? I'm guessing wildly here, I'm just wondering if it's seeing the same event from several different keyboards that are actually the same keyboard defined in several places?
[09:51] <Ng> seems kinda unlikely though
[09:52] <dfaure> indeed commenting out the input devices fixes it. Weird though, there was just one of each, not 3.
[10:22] <dfaure> Ng: thanks for the help. Everything ok now.
=== zorael_ is now known as Zorael
=== michael__ is now known as michaellarabel
[14:26] <tseliot> Sarvatt: ping
[15:22] <tseliot> Sarvatt: never mind
[15:22] <tseliot> ScottK: I have ported my patches for synaptics to Karmic. Have a look at my PPA (and at the bug report)
[15:23] <ScottK> tseliot: OK.  I'm reinstalling for ISO testing right now.  I'll give it a try in a bit.
[15:23] <tseliot> ok, thanks
=== Zorael is now known as Zorael^nb
[19:37] <jbarnes> bryce: so how goes the intel upstreaming?  is it all done?
[19:38] <jbarnes> bug upstreaming that is
[19:39] <bryce> jbarnes, I've got 15 or so left to go.  I sort of got inspired/distracted by a comment you made earlier, and have been working on a tool to do upstreaming for me
[19:41] <jbarnes> nice
[19:41] <bryce> there also seems to be some confusion as to whether I should set priorities on upstream bugs or leave it unset, so I'm waiting for the higher ups to get that sorted
[19:43] <bryce> jbarnes, http://people.canonical.com/~bryce//upstream.svg
[19:46] <jbarnes> that makes it look like only 20% are upstreamed so far?
[19:46] <jbarnes> bryce: I think it's ok to set prio
[19:46] <jbarnes> we may drop it down depending on our release schedule, but imo it's fine to set it as an indicator of its importance to you
[19:46] <jbarnes> the worry on our team was that we're using priorities as our release criteria
[19:46] <jbarnes> p1 bugs are basically release blockers
[19:47] <bryce> right, we got a bit over 20% but it fell lately because I pulled in 2.8.0 and closed out the upstreamed bugs that were fixed
[19:48] <bryce> what that chart doesn't tell is that 180 bugs are incomplete waiting on reporters
[19:48] <jbarnes> ah that's the discrepancy
[19:49] <bryce> yeah there's only 15-20 that I need to do something with.  But they're probably mostly just dupes of known issues
[19:49] <jbarnes> cool
[19:49] <jcristau> in most cases you don't hear back from people after asking for more information or asking to try a newer version, so the bugs sit there for a while.  at least that's my experience in debian.
[19:50] <jcristau> and those are not upstreamable
[19:50] <bryce> many of those incomplete bugs were ones reported with Jaunty's release, which my script asked them to re-test.  Those are all scheduled to expire here this coming week.  So I think we should see a nice jump in the stats within the week
[19:50] <bryce> jcristau, yep exactly
[20:22] <jbarnes> bryce: ok consensus is to mark prio according to what prio it is for ubuntu
[20:22] <jbarnes> like I said, we may bump it down but that can be handled at your regular meetings with yingying if there's disagreement
[20:32] <bryce> okie doke
[22:13] <bryce> I put in an openchrome git update in xorg-edgers if anyone's interested
[22:14] <jcristau> openchrome is in git now?
[22:28] <bryce> s/git/svn/
[22:28] <bryce> jcristau, at least I didn't say bzr snapshot ;-)
[22:31] <jcristau> bryce: heh. you had me hoping they made the switch :)
[23:03] <Sarvatt> got me too, i thought the same thing :D
=== jbarnes_ is now known as jbarnes