[00:09] <BUGabundo> eheh
[00:09] <BUGabundo> bug 403248
[00:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 403248 in gnome-power-manager "DIM will dim my screen even when not idle" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/403248
[00:09] <BUGabundo> this guy must not know me
[00:09] <BUGabundo> thanking me for using apport
[00:09] <BUGabundo> errr *all* my bugs for the last to cycles have been filed with it
[00:22] <caa> I think he was thanking you beacuse you were the first to use apport for that package
[00:23] <BUGabundo> I guess
[00:23] <BUGabundo> but I've filed GPM bugs before with apport
[00:23] <yofel> hm, I guess since you were the first that used the new apport hook for g-p-m
[00:25] <BUGabundo> yep
[00:25] <BUGabundo> seems like it
[00:25] <BUGabundo> maybe he wrote it
[00:25] <BUGabundo> and now is happy some one used it
[00:25] <BUGabundo> eheh
[00:25] <caa> hehe
[00:25] <caa> probably
[00:26] <BUGabundo> not even sure who _he_ is
[00:26]  * BUGabundo slowly scroll room members list
[00:50] <yofel> anybody an idea about my question?
[00:50] <yofel> 00:23:28 < yofel> hm, what is one supposed to do with an old bug report about a package that was only released in hardy and intrepid?
[00:51] <lifeless> if the package has been removed (not renamed), and its not something we'd do an RC update for, then close it wontfix
[00:51] <lifeless> because we wont ;P
[00:55] <yofel> lifeless: it's bug 106396 - I can't check it since the package doesn't exist in jauny and karmic and upstream is unreachable
[00:55] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 106396 in bmpx "bmpx close unexpectedly" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106396
[00:56] <micahg> yofel: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx
[00:56] <micahg> Deleted        in        jaunty-release                        on 2009-03-07        (Reason:          #337659, unmaintained, removed from Debian)
[00:57] <yofel> micahg: thx, can you set the bug to wontfix then?
[00:58] <micahg> sure
[00:58] <micahg> well
[00:59] <micahg> there's nothing we can do, right?
[01:01] <yofel> well, *I* don't know how to fix the bug, nor do I know where to search for it, and since upstream can't be reached and the package is officially unmaintained I don't know who could do something about it
[01:03] <micahg> done
[01:04] <yofel> micahg: thank you
[01:04]  * BUGabundo $ sle -ep; echo load /dev/urandom /dev/eyes
[01:04] <micahg> I should have checked with motu first
[01:04]  * micahg is checking now
[01:07] <hggdh> micahg, this is correct, as lifeless stated.
[01:56] <micahg> hggdh: ok, is that because of the error or becuase the package was removed?
[01:56] <micahg> ubuntu-motu seemed to say that we would do SRUs if it's worthy
[04:36] <micahg> ping hggdh
[05:53] <bcurtiswx> how late it is
[05:53] <bcurtiswx> wow
[05:57] <bcurtiswx> Fantasie in D minor, i was in a good mood, stupid minor chords :P
[07:12] <thekorn> good morning bugsquad
[09:59] <LimCore> hi, can you please confirm https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/403935
[09:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 403935 in totem "Totem, VLC, kaffeine - pauses playback of movie, when switching screen (i.e. VT-9)" [Undecided,New]
[11:09] <LimCore> all sound stop when I switch between users.  report this bug against what package?
[11:15] <LimCore> ok never mind it was dupe of 309724
[11:21] <LimCore> I guess. Reopened it - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/309724   please test does this happens for you also
[11:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 309724 in pulseaudio "no sound after fast switching between logged in users" [Low,Confirmed]
[11:35]  * LimCore wonders why it is such a slowe day today
[14:34] <lexual> I'm trying to close a bug, and can't see how. Am I missing something, or do I need some extra permissions?
[14:49] <lfaraone> Lupine: well, what would the resolution be?
[14:49] <lfaraone> Lupine: oops, wrong nick.,
[14:49] <Lupine> np :)
[16:02] <pedro_> thekorn, are you around?
[16:03] <pedro_> grgr
[16:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, i'm getting the following traceback while trying to add a comment to a report with python-launchpad-bugs: http://paste.ubuntu.com/230623/
[16:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, script is available here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/230624/
[17:04] <bdmurray> pedro_: python-launchpad-bugs isn't fully up to date with the all the launchpad changes.  I'd use launchpadlib if I were you.  If you need some help writing one let me know.
[17:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, that's what i thought...
[17:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, i'm migrating the scripts to launchpadlib now, found good examples at the ubuntu-qa-tools package
[17:06] <bdmurray> pedro_: yes, uncheck-patch-comment covers what you are looking for
[17:07] <bdmurray> pedro_: about like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/230734/
[17:08] <pedro_> bdmurray, yeap, i was looking into exactly that file
[17:09] <bdmurray> pedro_: well, great!
[17:24] <bneff> Trying to install karmic alpha 3, but screen goes black after a few mins
[17:24] <bneff> anyone had this?
[17:28] <bneff> The installer gets to Starting Ubiquity,...now it has a bunch of vertical lines
[17:37] <yofel> bneff: this channel is for help on triaging bugs, for karmic support please use #ubuntu+1. Thanks.
[17:38] <bneff> cool thx
[18:25] <james_w> bdmurray: when did you hit that lplib problem?
[18:26] <bdmurray> james_w: yesterday
[18:26] <james_w> I've got some of the same error
[18:26] <james_w> my guess is that the update caused it to spit out a bad file
[18:27] <james_w> and it sounds like that was cached
[18:27] <bdmurray> yes, mine was probably running during the upgrade
[21:11] <BUGabundo> ola
[21:55] <hggdh> ola BUGabundo
[21:56] <BUGabundo> atao nino
[23:21] <l3dx> ntu-bugsquad/d3bb0a4cbd317fbf2111e83dc1d52504f9d636de
[23:27] <Kamusin> sirs, I saw a report that have a post-installation script with broken packages, but main package is not in oficial ubuntu repository (daemon-tools)
[23:28] <Kamusin> what status shoul be marked? can I marked as invalid or ..?
[23:28] <Kamusin> should*
[23:31] <bdmurray> If the bug is not about an Ubuntu package or one provided by Ubuntu it should be marked invalid
[23:32] <Kamusin> thanks bdmurray ;)
[23:38] <l3dx> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/404339 <-- wishlist?
[23:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 404339 in ubuntu "Include Canon MP210 printer drivers" [Undecided,New]
[23:49] <l3dx> anyone around?
[23:49] <Admiral_Chicago> whats up l3dx
[23:49] <l3dx> hi
[23:49] <BUGabundo> some are l3dx
[23:50] <l3dx> I've just started reading over the howtos\buglists and I've found a openoffice bug, but I can't quite figure out if I should upstream it
[23:51] <l3dx> that is, I've found a bug filed by someone else
[23:51] <l3dx> so..I was just hoping for some advice
[23:53] <l3dx> should I file it over at oo.org and what should I do about the "ubuntu bug"
[23:55] <BUGabundo> l3dx: talk to ogra
[23:55] <BUGabundo> there are many restritions from SUN
[23:55] <BUGabundo> for our bugd
[23:56] <l3dx> BUGabundo: ok :)
[23:56] <bdmurray> BUGabundo: calc is the maintainer of openoffice.org
[23:56] <bdmurray> l3dx: what bug is it?
[23:56] <l3dx> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/404001
[23:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 404001 in openoffice.org "wrong result of var() function" [Undecided,New]
[23:56] <BUGabundo> oopss
[23:56] <BUGabundo> sorry ogra
[23:56] <BUGabundo> I meant to say calc
[23:57]  * BUGabundo slaps himself and goes to get a glass of water
[23:57] <bdmurray> l3dx: Did you say you had tested it?
[23:57] <l3dx> no, I've not
[23:57] <l3dx> as I said, I'm 100% fresh in the game
[23:58] <bdmurray> A good first step is to ensure the bug is reproducable, ideally with the development release of Ubuntu.
[23:58] <l3dx> ok, so I should do a dist-upgrade right away?
[23:59] <l3dx> though, this bug is for 9.04
[23:59] <bdmurray> l3dx: Right, but it likely wouldn't be fixed in that release.  Karmic is still an alpha, while I run it w/o problems the bug could be tested with a Live CD.