| nellery | jacob: mostly good now, but section should be games since it's not an actual game | 00:35 |
|---|---|---|
| nellery | rather a pidgin plugin | 00:35 |
| nellery | so it should be net | 00:35 |
| nellery | but I'll advocate and leave a comment for the uploader to change it | 00:35 |
| Sarvatt | Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0) in the binary deb created from that, no libpurple0 or pidgin? | 00:52 |
| Sarvatt | should it be pidgin-gfire since its a pidgin plugin? | 00:53 |
| quidnunc | What's the command to extract the control file from a deb? (Or any other command that will give me a list of dependencies from a deb) | 00:54 |
| quidnunc | I'll ask in #ubuntu | 00:56 |
| jacob | nellery: sounds good, thanks again. | 00:58 |
| nellery | jacob: ah, right, you're missing a dependency on pidgin | 01:02 |
| jacob | nellery: oops? i am? | 01:03 |
| jacob | ah, didn't see the scrollback | 01:03 |
| Sarvatt | quidnunc: dpkg -I | 01:04 |
| quidnunc | Sarvatt: Thanks | 01:12 |
| jacob | nellery: fixed both & uploaded | 01:13 |
| === cprov-afk is now known as cprov | ||
| === OldSchool is now known as vorian | ||
| === swoody_ is now known as swoody | ||
| hemanth | hi,i am packing pidginguifications-2.16 , got a build time error as checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool make: *** [config.status] Error 1 . So i added dependencies "libxml-parser-perl" in the control file , but got the same error again , how do i move about ? | 04:34 |
| kamalnandan | Hi..good morning folks | 06:20 |
| kamalnandan | Hi..I am facing some problems while using this command "apt-get install devscripts" | 06:34 |
| kamalnandan | when I issue this command, the command window turns blue, with the title "Package configuration" | 06:35 |
| kamalnandan | and after that I see the following message: | 06:36 |
| kamalnandan | âââââââââââââââââââââââââ⤠Postfix Configuration ââââââââââââââââââââââââââ | 06:36 |
| kamalnandan | what do i need to do now? | 06:37 |
| kamalnandan | any clue guys? | 06:37 |
| jmarsden | kamalnandan: You need to configure postfix :) devscripts wants to be able to send email from your machine, and so it oulls in postfix so it can do that. | 07:09 |
| Megasoft | hola | 08:05 |
| dmentre | gaspa: I've seen you have started round 3. Thanks! | 10:00 |
| kamalnandan | Hi.. | 10:01 |
| james_w | dmentre: anything for main in this round? | 10:02 |
| kamalnandan | I am new to Ubuntu package development..I am following the following tutorial and the given example to learn basic ubuntu packaging.. | 10:02 |
| kamalnandan | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic | 10:02 |
| dmentre | james_w: yes. ledit. See LP bug 404470. I'm done a mass-sync.txt. Let me know if this is correct or not | 10:03 |
| kamalnandan | I followed the example given therein at the link..but when I use the command "debuild-S", the packaging fails.. | 10:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 404470 in pcre-ocaml "[3.11.1 transition][round 3/6] Please synchronize following packages from Debian sid in Karmic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/404470 | 10:03 |
| dmentre | s/I'm/I've/ | 10:03 |
| james_w | kamalnandan: what's the message you get? | 10:03 |
| kamalnandan | james_w: thanks for your reply..:-)..I get the following error message: | 10:05 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| kamalnandan | make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. | 10:05 |
| kamalnandan | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kamal/work/packaging/hello/hello/hello-2.4' | 10:05 |
| === NCommand` is now known as NCommander | ||
| james_w | is there a Makefile? | 10:05 |
| kamalnandan | the "rules" file is there..where at the top I have declared "#! /usr/bin/make -f". | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | and in the file, I have a target like as follows: | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | clean: | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | dh_testdir | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | dh_clean | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | rm -f build | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | -$(MAKE) -i distclean | 10:06 |
| kamalnandan | the target is "clean".. | 10:07 |
| kamalnandan | and the last 4 lines are the rules to make the target | 10:07 |
| kamalnandan | though I have used make files in the past, but not this rules file and its not quite clear | 10:08 |
| kamalnandan | i simply copied the rules script from the following link: | 10:08 |
| kamalnandan | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic | 10:08 |
| james_w | that looks ok to me | 10:10 |
| james_w | and it shouldn't fail | 10:11 |
| james_w | as it has "-" at the start of the distclean line | 10:11 |
| james_w | does the message you get actually terminate the build? | 10:11 |
| kamalnandan | james_w: not really, that doesnt termintae the build.. | 10:12 |
| kamalnandan | i get some other message too further ahead.. | 10:12 |
| james_w | dmentre: ACKed | 10:12 |
| gaspa | dmentre: yes, I've uploaded this morning part of the round3. | 10:13 |
| james_w | I'll look at the rest as well | 10:13 |
| gaspa | now i've to go out... :) | 10:13 |
| james_w | kamalnandan: that's ok then | 10:13 |
| james_w | kamalnandan: you can change "-$(MAKE) -i distclean" to "[ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) -i distclean" to avoid the message | 10:13 |
| kamalnandan | james_w: I will just copy and paste the other errors too | 10:14 |
| dmentre | james_w: many thanks! I need to leave the channel. | 10:14 |
| dmentre | gaspa: ok, see you later | 10:15 |
| kamalnandan | ok..james_w, but i am just pasting the other errors as well : | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | rm -f build | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kamal/work/packaging/hello/hello/hello-2.4' | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kamal/work/packaging/hello/hello/hello-2.4' | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored) | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-source -b hello-2.4 | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0' | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-source: info: building hello in hello_2.4-0Ubuntu1.tar.gz | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-source: info: building hello in hello_2.4-0Ubuntu1.dsc | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-genchanges -S >../hello_2.4-0Ubuntu1_source.changes | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | dpkg-buildpackage: source only upload: Debian-native package | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | Now running lintian... | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | warning: lintian's authors do not recommend running it with root privileges! | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | W: hello source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 132 | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | W: hello source: bad-homepage aqsis.org | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | W: hello source: native-package-with-dash-version | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | Finished running lintian. | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | Now signing changes and any dsc files... | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | signfile hello_2.4-0Ubuntu1.dsc Kamal Nandan <kamal.nandan@gmail.com> | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | gpg: skipped "Kamal Nandan <kamal.nandan@gmail.com>": secret key not available | 10:16 |
| iulian | kamalnandan: Stop it. | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | debsign: gpg error occurred! Aborting.... | 10:16 |
| kamalnandan | debuild: fatal error at line 1250: | 10:17 |
| tuantub | kamalnandan: just use paste service :-ss | 10:17 |
| kamalnandan | running debsign failed | 10:17 |
| iulian | Err | 10:17 |
| iulian | !pastebin | kamalnandan | 10:17 |
| ubottu | kamalnandan: pastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. The Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu.com (make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic) | 10:17 |
| kamalnandan | sorry..I am new to IRC..and am not aware of the etiquettes of IRC.. | 10:18 |
| james_w | kamalnandan: the failure was a failure to sign | 10:19 |
| james_w | "debuild -S -uc -us" will avoid that | 10:19 |
| kamalnandan | james_w: ok, I will just try that.. | 10:20 |
| kamalnandan | BTW, I just used paste.ubuntu.com..:-)..and here is the link.. | 10:20 |
| kamalnandan | http://paste.ubuntu.com/233756/ | 10:21 |
| kamalnandan | james_w, I dont see any error after executing this command that you gave to me, but I dont see any .deb file getting created.. | 10:24 |
| kamalnandan | shouldnt it create a .deb file in the parent directory? | 10:24 |
| james_w | nope | 10:24 |
| james_w | remove "-S" if you want a deb file | 10:24 |
| tuantub | kamalnandan: remove or comment the line : /usr/bin/make -i distclean | 10:24 |
| tuantub | kamalnandan: in debian/rules to avoid error while building package | 10:25 |
| kamalnandan | deb file is the package file..am i right? | 10:26 |
| kamalnandan | tuantub: ok..i will do that | 10:27 |
| james_w | tuantub: no need | 10:27 |
| james_w | kamalnandan: correct, however "debuild -S" means "build a source package" | 10:28 |
| james_w | run "debuild -uc -us" if you want a .deb | 10:28 |
| * tuantub :-/ | 10:29 | |
| kamalnandan | whats the diff between a source package and .deb package..? | 10:29 |
| kamalnandan | as far as i know, .deb package is meant for delivering to the consumer..its a kind of installer and the user doesnt need the source.. | 10:30 |
| james_w | yep | 10:30 |
| kamalnandan | and .deb shouldnt be containg the source.. | 10:30 |
| james_w | a source package is what developers work with though | 10:30 |
| james_w | it's damn hard to make changes to a .deb | 10:30 |
| james_w | so we would with a source package that contains the source | 10:31 |
| james_w | then we build that to produce binary packages that the user installs | 10:31 |
| james_w | a source package is either unpacked or packed | 10:31 |
| james_w | you are working from an unpacked source package directory | 10:31 |
| kamalnandan | yes..so why would a developer need a source package..because developer anyway is having the source files..isnt it?..yes though unpacked.. | 10:31 |
| james_w | "debuild -S" means pack this source package so that I can send it to someone else or to an archive | 10:32 |
| kamalnandan | but one can easily pack the source file using "tar" and gzip | 10:32 |
| james_w | "debuild" means take this unpacked source package and build it to give the .debs | 10:32 |
| james_w | yeah, but we have a command to automate it | 10:32 |
| kamalnandan | tar and gzip too are commands and not that lengthy..why make all that effort of going via ubuntu packaging process.. | 10:33 |
| james_w | do it with tar and gzip if you like | 10:34 |
| james_w | given that I do that operation many times a day I would rather just have a single command to do it | 10:34 |
| kamalnandan | sorry..i am new to packaging as well..i am asking so many questions that would be "stupid" from an expert's viewpoint.. | 10:35 |
| james_w | nope | 10:36 |
| james_w | I just don't see why you are arguing that we should make people put *more* effort in :-) | 10:36 |
| james_w | it's the opposite of what people normally say about Ubuntu development | 10:36 |
| kamalnandan | I am saying this, because I have never done this..and I have been using tar and gzip so far..i dont have any experience in packaging.. | 10:38 |
| kamalnandan | i have been told to build an ubuntu package for a project..and I am trying to learn the basics first..infact, source packaging I was not really on my agenda(as per my knowledge)..i had just assumed that I have to package a set of binaries and shared objects so that when the package gets installed, the user can run the program.. | 10:40 |
| kamalnandan | but now it seems much more is implied in packaging.. | 10:40 |
| kamalnandan | :-) | 10:40 |
| kamalnandan | nevertheless..its going on getting interesting..and I think I would be able to appreciate the process more when I have a better understanding of the same.. | 10:41 |
| james_w | dmentre: ocaml-libvirt doesn't build | 10:47 |
| james_w | Depends: libgettext-ocaml-dev (> 0.3.2-2) but it is not installable | 10:50 |
| dmentre | james_w: ack. searching... | 10:57 |
| dmentre | james_w: ocaml-gettext is in round 4, libvirt in round3. Depedencies of libvirt must have changed with 0.6 version | 11:00 |
| dmentre | james_w: I suggest to move libvirt in round 5. I'll check which packages depend on libvirt | 11:02 |
| dmentre | james_w: ok, virt-top (currently in round 5) depends on libvirt so move virt-top to round 6 | 11:06 |
| dmentre | james_w: oops, sorry. You said *>* 0.3.2-2!! | 11:09 |
| dmentre | I'll ask debian developers | 11:09 |
| dmentre | In the meantime, we can drop libvirt and virt-top. As far as I know, no other packages depend on them. | 11:11 |
| dmentre | james_w: just to be sure: "libgettext-ocaml-dev (>> 0.3.2-2)" means "strictly greater than 0.3.2-2"?? | 11:13 |
| dmentre | james_w: ok, found it: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html | 11:14 |
| dmentre | james_w: email sent, waiting for answer. | 11:21 |
| geser | dmentre: would it be possible to include the other archs in your ocaml transition monitor too? so we have a better overview | 11:40 |
| james_w | thanks dmentre | 11:42 |
| dmentre | geser: yes. Where can I find Packages.gz for those arch? | 11:51 |
| geser | from where did you get the ones for i386 and amd64? | 11:52 |
| dmentre | geser: http://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu | 11:54 |
| Laney | dmentre: ports.u.c | 11:54 |
| dmentre | Laney: thanks | 11:55 |
| dmentre | geser: as the host is different, I need to change the code which is not designed for that. That might take a while. | 11:55 |
| dmentre | Or I can simply made a second version for ports | 11:56 |
| dmentre | I'll look at it | 11:56 |
| === bastiao__ is now known as k0p | ||
| k0p | Hello guys! | 13:35 |
| k0p | If a software make a release after freeze feature no way to include it in 9.10 official repositories? | 13:36 |
| joaopinto | !sru | 13:37 |
| k0p | joaopinto, is it suppose appear something in private message? | 13:37 |
| k0p | it changes a bit since last year. | 13:38 |
| k0p | !sru | 13:38 |
| Laney | hm | 13:38 |
| Laney | you can request a feature freeze exception for new upstream releases | 13:38 |
| Laney | we don't seem to have a bot currently | 13:39 |
| k0p | where I can request? | 13:39 |
| iulian | k0p: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | 13:39 |
| iulian | Laney: Yea, ubbotu is on holiday, it seems. | 13:39 |
| k0p | btw last year I saw a system where the new package is upload and reviews make coments, votes etc. Is it exists? | 13:39 |
| k0p | thanks | 13:39 |
| joaopinto | k0p, http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/ | 13:42 |
| k0p | yeah revu :> | 13:42 |
| k0p | thanls | 13:42 |
| k0p | thanks* | 13:42 |
| k0p | btw you're Portuguese, right? | 13:43 |
| arand | So, I'm trying to patch goffice, and apparently it has no patch system in use, not even a patching entry in debian/rules, I have the thing from the packaging wiki that should be added to the rules file to allow stand-alone patch-system-less patches, now I wonder, where and how should I add it? I'm assuming the order in the rules file matters. | 13:52 |
| dmentre | geser: ports specific version done: http://bentobako.org/ubuntu-ocaml-status/transition_monitor/ports_transition_monitor.html | 14:00 |
| geser | dmentre: thanks, the situation looks pretty good on the other archs | 14:01 |
| dmentre | geser: yes. After a while, one needs to look at individual cases to check for build failures. | 14:03 |
| dmentre | geser: should I remove hppa? Supported arch? | 14:03 |
| geser | you can remove hppa, IIRC it's not supported in karmic anymore and for previous release only on a best-effort basis | 14:04 |
| simon-o | hi, I filed a sync in request in bug 403565 but the sync failed because a package in main should be replaced by a package in universe. I'm not sure on how to proceed. Any ideas? | 14:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 403565 in lyx "Sync lyx 1.6.3-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/403565 | 14:08 |
| geser | simon-o: which source package latex-xft-fonts belong now? | 14:09 |
| Laney | so l-x-f moved from its own source package to lyx | 14:10 |
| simon-o | geser: lyx. latex-xft-fonts is a transitional package for ttf-lyx. So ttf-lyx should be moved to main | 14:10 |
| simon-o | Laney: yes | 14:10 |
| Laney | simon-o: you can file a request to this effect | 14:10 |
| geser | it was part of lyx in the past already? | 14:12 |
| simon-o | geser: No it wasn't | 14:12 |
| simon-o | It's in it's own source package | 14:13 |
| arand | Hum, should I even bother about making a stand-alone .patch if the current package does not use them at all? | 14:14 |
| bdrung_ | hi, how can i determine which is the latest version of a source package (currently karmic)? i want to use this information in an shell script. | 14:18 |
| dmentre | geser: hppa removed | 14:18 |
| geser | bdrung_: for a shell script I'd suggest using rmadison | 14:19 |
| bdrung_ | geser: thanks | 14:20 |
| bdrung_ | that's what i want | 14:20 |
| geser | simon-o: don't know what the best course in the lyx case, as moving tty-lyx would require moving the lyx source package to main (even if lyx itself stays in universe) | 14:22 |
| simon-o | geser: ok, any idea whom I may ask on how to proceed? | 14:23 |
| geser | I would suggest asking someone from the ~ubuntu-mir team | 14:24 |
| simon-o | geser: thanks, I'll do that | 14:26 |
| arand | Is there anyplace else I could get some answers to my patching woes? | 14:27 |
| geser | arand: if the source package doesn't use a patch system, patch directly | 14:31 |
| arand | geser: so just honk and drive without no stand-alone .patch files? | 14:32 |
| geser | yes | 14:33 |
| arand | geser: Since in reading the packaging guide they still seem to recommed using the simple .patch + rules file entry patching scheme, even if the package does not use a patching system, but that does simplyfiy things a lot, so it think I will take you advice ;) | 14:34 |
| geser | arand: but this end in most cases the package using both direct patching and patches through a patch system | 14:47 |
| arand | geser: ah, so the point of stand-alone patches is kinda lost anyways? | 14:49 |
| geser | yes for the most part | 14:50 |
| === cprov is now known as cprov-afk | ||
| === paulproteus_ is now known as paulproteus | ||
| lfaraone | If I have a package with a RFS in debian (update to an existing package I maintain), is it poor form to request an ubuntu1 MOTU upload in the meantime (I'm worried I won't meet the FF deadline) | 17:24 |
| hyperair | if you make sure that your orig.tar.gz matches, then it should be fine | 17:25 |
| c_korn | hm, how does it come blender 2.49a is not in karmic yet? it is in debian but https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html comments it with: Awaiting 2.49a from upstream... | 17:36 |
| geser | c_korn: my guess: the person who added the comment got busy and didn't had time to do the merge or so | 17:37 |
| c_korn | geser: must have gotten quite busy then. debian has it since June 1st. | 17:39 |
| lfaraone | hyperair: matches? | 17:46 |
| hyperair | lfaraone: simply put, the orig.tar.gz that enters ubuntu *must* be exactly the same as the one that enters debian | 17:48 |
| hyperair | or hell will break loose. | 17:48 |
| geser | c_korn: you are free to help with the merge | 17:58 |
| c_korn | geser: I did not know I have permissions. how can I help? | 17:59 |
| geser | c_korn: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging | 18:18 |
| arand | When I run debsign -S on a .changes file what does it send to gpg in order to identify the key? Unless I specify it manually it's unable to find it... | 18:49 |
| james_w | arand: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperGuide/Uploading#Signing%20the%20package | 18:56 |
| AnAnt | Hello, I'm working on sl-modem package, I'm trying to get udev support on it, problem is that I don't have a smartlink modem now, anyone interested in testing it ? | 18:58 |
| AnAnt | anyone who has a smartlink modem of course | 18:58 |
| arand | james_w: but is that really correct? since when I run the command there (dpkg-...) I get out "My Name <my@email.com>" and if I do gpg --list-secret-keys "My Name <my@email.com>" Id does not find anything. However If I only send "My Name" or "<my@email.com>" to gpg it _does_ find the relevant key... What!? | 19:02 |
| james_w | arand: well, it's correct. The issue you describe is why you get the problem | 19:03 |
| james_w | you need to be more precise if you would like help in identifying the issue | 19:04 |
| james_w | e.g. actual command output | 19:04 |
| james_w | they need to match on the byte level | 19:04 |
| arand | james_w: Ah, there it is, the comment, blurgh, ok now I get it. | 19:06 |
| james_w | arand: feel free to edit the wiki if you think the comment thing should be more explicit | 19:10 |
| AnAnt | james_w: are you a ubuntu-main-sponsor ? | 19:12 |
| james_w | I am I think | 19:12 |
| AnAnt | james_w: can you look at this: LP 404561 | 19:12 |
| AnAnt | bug 404561 | 19:13 |
| AnAnt | hmmm | 19:13 |
| AnAnt | Candidate revision debhelper_7.3.8ubuntu1 | 19:13 |
| AnAnt | what happened to ubuto ? | 19:14 |
| === santiago-pgsql is now known as santiago-ve | ||
| geser | it's his day off :) | 19:21 |
| AnAnt | erm, I take this as a joke, right / | 19:21 |
| AnAnt | ? | 19:21 |
| geser | yes | 19:22 |
| james_w | AnAnt: it's dinner now, I'll keep it open in my browser though | 19:22 |
| AnAnt | james_w: ok, thanks | 19:22 |
| nhandler | AnAnt: The issue has been reported, and I believe that they are working on getting him back up and running again | 19:23 |
| lfaraone | james_w: hey, would you have a chance to sponsor a new-upstream-version to a package of mine? (python library, small) | 20:01 |
| ripps | could a motu sync the version of xvattr from debian unstable into Karmic? The current version is broken | 20:30 |
| dtchen | you can file the sync request | 20:31 |
| AnAnt | ripps: it's easy, just run: requestsync -s <source package> karmic | 20:33 |
| ripps | AnAnt: I get a bunch of python errors when I run that command | 20:34 |
| AnAnt | ripps: hmmm, do you use --lp option ? | 20:34 |
| ripps | AnAnt: no | 20:34 |
| ripps | Should I? | 20:34 |
| AnAnt | ripps: wierd | 20:34 |
| AnAnt | ripps: well, I got problems with --lp option, so I don't use it | 20:34 |
| ripps | AnAnt: the problem seems to be in ubuntutools/lp/lpapiwrapper.py | 20:36 |
| ripps | bunch of errors with it | 20:36 |
| AnAnt | ripps: are you using karmic now ? | 20:36 |
| ripps | AnAnt: yes | 20:36 |
| geser | ripps: I assume then you run karmic then | 20:37 |
| ripps | yes | 20:37 |
| geser | ripps: which errors so I can fix them? | 20:37 |
| ripps | let me pastbin it | 20:37 |
| ripps | geser: http://pastebin.com/f372d3095 | 20:38 |
| geser | ripps: how did you call requestsync? | 20:39 |
| ripps | just as AnAnt told me to: requestsync -s xvattr karmic | 20:40 |
| geser | ripps: call once "manage-credentials create -c ubuntu-dev-tools -l 2" to setup once the access to the LP API | 20:41 |
| AnAnt | geser: is that needed if he doesn't use --lp ? | 20:41 |
| ripps | geser: what level of acces do I want? | 20:41 |
| geser | AnAnt: looks like, the script uses the LP API to fetch some data about a source package (version, component) or uses it to check if one needs sponsorship even when one mails the report | 20:43 |
| AnAnt | oh yes | 20:43 |
| geser | ripps: write public (e.g. for filing sync requests) | 20:43 |
| AnAnt | geser: I see in the changelog something about checking if someone needs sponsorship | 20:43 |
| ripps | geser: so, "change non-private data" | 20:43 |
| geser | ripps: yes | 20:44 |
| AnAnt | but why do this check if the user explicitly specified -s ? | 20:44 |
| geser | AnAnt: yes, I don't know if there is way to do it without using LP API or screen-scraping LP pages (which is also bad) | 20:45 |
| ripps | geser AnAnt: xvattr doesn't appear to exist in debian | 20:45 |
| geser | AnAnt: I plan to look at the script to rewrite some parts and see if it's possible to make it less dependend on the LP API if one doesn't use the --lp switch | 20:45 |
| geser | ripps: so this package came from some other source (repository) | 20:47 |
| dtchen | debian-multimedia.org, it looks like | 20:47 |
| ripps | dtchen: oh, I might have | 20:48 |
| ripps | Would it be possible to sync from that repo? | 20:48 |
| AnAnt | thanks | 20:48 |
| dtchen | ripps: yes, it can be done | 20:49 |
| geser | sure, but you have to file a sync request by hand | 20:49 |
| lfaraone | Should REVU be used for updates to existing packages? (not patches, a new upstream version) | 20:50 |
| Laney | no | 20:50 |
| Laney | submit a .diff.gz to the bug | 20:50 |
| ripps | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xvattr/+bug/405015 | 20:55 |
| lfaraone | Ok, any sponsors lurking around? | 21:13 |
| gaspa | james_w: could you please do a rebuild of gmetadom package. | 21:29 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| ScottK | If someone has a decent example of a package that uses debhelper 7 style short rules and builds multiple binaries, I'd appreciate a pointer towards it. | 22:12 |
| Laney | ScottK: banshee does | 22:15 |
| Laney | It has some overrides though | 22:15 |
| ScottK | Laney: Thanks. | 22:15 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| directhex | Laney, wasn't banshee cdbs? | 23:52 |
| directhex | oh yeah, didn't hyperair reqrite it? | 23:52 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| Laney | directhex: looks like it | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!