[12:22] <niadh> Hey I have an unusual issue was wondering if anyone had come across it before. My motherboard failed so I replaced it, ubuntu appeared to not need to be reinstalled because everything appeared to work fine. After a week the sound card would not produce any sound and the live CD can't seem to play music either
[12:25] <yofel> niadh: this  channel is for help on triaging bugs, for usual support use #ubuntu for stable releases and #ubuntu+1 for karmic
[12:26] <niadh> Hence why I'm here, is it not a valid bug? Am searching the bug list atm to find something similar see if it's been reported yet
[12:27] <yofel> niadh: which ubuntu release are you using?
[12:27] <niadh> 9.04
[12:28] <yofel> did you check that no channel got muted? especially mster,pcm and front in alsamixer
[12:31] <Ranakah> niadh try to replace pulse with esound.. working for me
[12:33] <niadh> alsamixer shows all channels unmuted and at full
[12:33] <Ranakah> pulseaudio sux
[12:33] <niadh> How do I replaced pulse with anything alsa worked well for me
[12:34] <Ranakah> sudo apt-get remove pulseaudio esound+
[12:34] <niadh> oh, ok
[12:34] <niadh> Is there a command to undo that should it not work?
[12:34] <niadh> ... remove esound pulseaudio+?
[12:35] <Ranakah> yap
[12:35] <Ranakah> sudo apt-get remove esound pulseaudio+
[12:35] <Ranakah> :>
[12:36] <niadh> how do I restart the sound daemon?
[12:37] <Ranakah> huh... don't know.. restart system
[15:34] <bddebian> Boo
[16:58] <ejat> can someone look into bug 404546
[16:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 404546 in ppp "pppd crash (unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000014)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/404546
[18:16] <maxb> Hi, any thoughts on where I can most usefully file a bug noting that the default murrine progress bar causes Xorg to chew CPU ?
[18:16] <maxb> It rather cuts across X, gtk, and graphics drivers
[18:18] <Kamusin> is it Linux Mint  supported by ubuntu?
[18:19] <Flannel> !mintsupport
[18:19] <ubot4> Linux Mint is not a supported derivative of Ubuntu, please seek support in #linuxmint on irc.spotchat.org
[18:20] <Kamusin> thanks, because I am seeing a report that has reported a problem with skype package provided by medibuntu repo and his user is using Linux Mint
[19:00] <Kamusin> if I package is not provided by ubuntu in a report, I have to mark as invalid nothing more?
[19:00]  * Kamusin a package*
[19:07] <micahg> yes, you can use the standard response on the responses page
[19:07] <showard> mica beat me to it: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Packages%20not%20provided%20by%20Ubuntu
[20:17] <kklimonda> hey, why is bug 297793 still on hugday list for nautilus?
[20:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 297793 in gvfs "Inconsistent spelling of "Filesystem" (vs. "File system")" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/297793
[20:18] <kklimonda> (it is triaged and assigned to desktop team)
[20:18] <kklimonda> desktop-bugs*
[20:19] <kklimonda> Also I think there is something wrong with bug watches for GNOME bugzilla - it's another bug I've seen that can't import bug from there
[20:19] <thekorn> kklimonda, it is in the category of "14 Bugs with Patches"
[20:20] <thekorn> and this bugreport has attachments which are marked as aptches
[20:20] <kklimonda> thekorn, yes - but it's triaged and beeing worked on
[20:20] <kklimonda> maybe because it's in gvts..
[20:21] <thekorn> kklimonda, I'm not sure, but the items in this category seem to be totally independant from status
[20:22] <thekorn> criteria seems to be patch or no patch
[20:22] <kklimonda> from a patch attached I think that this particular bug shouldn't be reported against nautilus as nautilus takes name from gvfs module.. I'll check it and probably invalidate nautilus task..
[20:24] <thekorn> I think this category does not make sense at all for this hugday, as the desktop team has a very strict policy on how to handle patches,
[20:24] <thekorn> and what status such bugreports get,
[20:25] <thekorn> so maybe "working" on them as hugday tasks might cause more harm than beeing helpful
[20:34] <bdmurray> part of the intent of the patches section was to unmark patches which are clearly not like screenshots
[20:38] <thekorn> bdmurray, ok, but the desktop guys are doing so good work, there will never be an attachment marked as a patch when it's not a patch ;)
[20:39] <bdmurray> thekorn: ah, that's great! pedro has been setting up the hug days most recently so maybe mention it to him?
[20:40] <kklimonda> actuallly i've found one png marked as patch just now ;)
[20:40] <bdmurray> some images can be patches...
[20:40] <kklimonda> but I have to agree that desktop team is pretty good at keeping their bugs clean
[20:42] <kklimonda> bdmurray, when you mark file as a patch it's content type is set to text/plain and you can't open it directly in browser..
[20:42] <kklimonda> i mean if it's an image and not a text file.
[20:44] <bdmurray> I think sometimes it is set to other things than text/plain like if it is a debdiff but that text/plain will be used as a fallback if the type is not detected.  However, I'm not positive - the launchpad team would know best.
[21:30] <BUGabundo> hey hey hey guud evening ;)
[21:30]  * BUGabundo is Happy.... enjoy while you can :D
[21:30] <kklimonda> happy? why?
[21:34] <BUGabundo> better question: why not!!
[21:34] <BUGabundo> I'm that kinda of guy! I'll be Happy unless I have reasons to not be!
[21:34] <kklimonda> BUGabundo, dunno, I live in Poland - nothing to be happy about ;)
[21:34] <kklimonda> sure
[21:34] <kklimonda> ;)