=== MT- is now known as bluefoxity === bluefoxity is now known as MT- [12:22] Hey I have an unusual issue was wondering if anyone had come across it before. My motherboard failed so I replaced it, ubuntu appeared to not need to be reinstalled because everything appeared to work fine. After a week the sound card would not produce any sound and the live CD can't seem to play music either [12:25] niadh: this channel is for help on triaging bugs, for usual support use #ubuntu for stable releases and #ubuntu+1 for karmic [12:26] Hence why I'm here, is it not a valid bug? Am searching the bug list atm to find something similar see if it's been reported yet [12:27] niadh: which ubuntu release are you using? [12:27] 9.04 [12:28] did you check that no channel got muted? especially mster,pcm and front in alsamixer [12:31] niadh try to replace pulse with esound.. working for me [12:33] alsamixer shows all channels unmuted and at full [12:33] pulseaudio sux [12:33] How do I replaced pulse with anything alsa worked well for me [12:34] sudo apt-get remove pulseaudio esound+ [12:34] oh, ok [12:34] Is there a command to undo that should it not work? [12:34] ... remove esound pulseaudio+? [12:35] yap [12:35] sudo apt-get remove esound pulseaudio+ [12:35] :> [12:36] how do I restart the sound daemon? [12:37] huh... don't know.. restart system === Guest30008 is now known as Takhisis === Guest47454 is now known as jussi01 [15:34] Boo [16:58] can someone look into bug 404546 [16:58] Launchpad bug 404546 in ppp "pppd crash (unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000014)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/404546 === ejat is now known as e-jat === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara [18:16] Hi, any thoughts on where I can most usefully file a bug noting that the default murrine progress bar causes Xorg to chew CPU ? [18:16] It rather cuts across X, gtk, and graphics drivers [18:18] is it Linux Mint supported by ubuntu? [18:19] !mintsupport [18:19] Linux Mint is not a supported derivative of Ubuntu, please seek support in #linuxmint on irc.spotchat.org [18:20] thanks, because I am seeing a report that has reported a problem with skype package provided by medibuntu repo and his user is using Linux Mint === WelshDragon is now known as Fluffles === micahg1 is now known as micahg [19:00] if I package is not provided by ubuntu in a report, I have to mark as invalid nothing more? [19:00] * Kamusin a package* === MT- is now known as profarius [19:07] yes, you can use the standard response on the responses page [19:07] mica beat me to it: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Packages%20not%20provided%20by%20Ubuntu === profarius is now known as MT- [20:17] hey, why is bug 297793 still on hugday list for nautilus? [20:17] Launchpad bug 297793 in gvfs "Inconsistent spelling of "Filesystem" (vs. "File system")" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/297793 [20:18] (it is triaged and assigned to desktop team) [20:18] desktop-bugs* [20:19] Also I think there is something wrong with bug watches for GNOME bugzilla - it's another bug I've seen that can't import bug from there [20:19] kklimonda, it is in the category of "14 Bugs with Patches" [20:20] and this bugreport has attachments which are marked as aptches [20:20] thekorn, yes - but it's triaged and beeing worked on [20:20] maybe because it's in gvts.. [20:21] kklimonda, I'm not sure, but the items in this category seem to be totally independant from status [20:22] criteria seems to be patch or no patch [20:22] from a patch attached I think that this particular bug shouldn't be reported against nautilus as nautilus takes name from gvfs module.. I'll check it and probably invalidate nautilus task.. [20:24] I think this category does not make sense at all for this hugday, as the desktop team has a very strict policy on how to handle patches, [20:24] and what status such bugreports get, [20:25] so maybe "working" on them as hugday tasks might cause more harm than beeing helpful [20:34] part of the intent of the patches section was to unmark patches which are clearly not like screenshots [20:38] bdmurray, ok, but the desktop guys are doing so good work, there will never be an attachment marked as a patch when it's not a patch ;) [20:39] thekorn: ah, that's great! pedro has been setting up the hug days most recently so maybe mention it to him? [20:40] actuallly i've found one png marked as patch just now ;) [20:40] some images can be patches... [20:40] but I have to agree that desktop team is pretty good at keeping their bugs clean [20:42] bdmurray, when you mark file as a patch it's content type is set to text/plain and you can't open it directly in browser.. [20:42] i mean if it's an image and not a text file. [20:44] I think sometimes it is set to other things than text/plain like if it is a debdiff but that text/plain will be used as a fallback if the type is not detected. However, I'm not positive - the launchpad team would know best. [21:30] hey hey hey guud evening ;) [21:30] * BUGabundo is Happy.... enjoy while you can :D [21:30] happy? why? [21:34] better question: why not!! [21:34] I'm that kinda of guy! I'll be Happy unless I have reasons to not be! [21:34] BUGabundo, dunno, I live in Poland - nothing to be happy about ;) [21:34] sure [21:34] ;) === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo === nhandler is now known as info === info is now known as nhandler