[09:35] <bdrung> asac: it needs some more error handling, help messages and a manpage
[09:38] <e-jat> asac: did chromium support pdf viewer for the time being?
[09:41] <asac> e-jat: why not just try ;)
[09:42] <e-jat> asac: i have try .. but nothing appear :)
[09:42] <e-jat> using it right now ..
[09:42] <e-jat> ive try it for slideshare.net
[09:42] <asac> i guess not. you probably would need to enable plugins
[09:42] <e-jat> asac: owh .. ok ..
[09:42] <e-jat> so i need to copy pdf plugin that was use in ff ?
[09:42] <e-jat> :)
[09:43] <asac> you can enable that experimental plugins feature by setting some magic in /etc/chromium*/default
[09:43] <e-jat> is it?
[09:43] <asac> no clue about the current plugin state. wait for fta
[09:43] <asac> bdrung: yeah. i wrote a test suite like thing. looks pretty good.
[09:44] <asac> not yet sure which name to use for it though
[09:44] <asac> moz-compare-versions ;)
[09:44] <asac> or mozcmp
[09:44] <asac> :=
[09:44] <asac> or something else?
[09:48] <e-jat> CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""i can see only
[09:48] <e-jat> :)
[09:50] <asac> e-jat: you will figure. its probably coded in chromium-browser warpper script
[09:50] <asac> otherwise wait for fta ;)
[09:50] <e-jat> mean .. need to specify : --enable-extensions --load-extension="/some/path"
[09:50] <e-jat> asac: ok i will :)
[09:51] <e-jat> so far so good with the chromium .. after flash seem working fine :)
[09:51] <asac> http://identi.ca/notice/6796569
[09:51] <asac> so flash works?
[09:51] <asac> how did you enable it?
[09:53] <e-jat> asac: i copy libflashplayer.so to /usr/lib/chromium-browser/plugins/
[09:53] <e-jat> then run it with --enable-plugins
[09:54] <asac> k
[09:54] <e-jat> r0x :)
[11:27] <aquarius> asac, hey
[11:32] <asac> aquarius: hi
[11:33] <aquarius> asac, your CouchDB patch from yesterday (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-435) wasn't quite enough, it turns out; the spidermonkey API apparently changed, and another chap did a different patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-288
[11:34] <aquarius> asac, your views on those would be interesting; I don't know enough about spidermonkey to evaluate the other guy's patch to know whether it's the Right Thing or not
[11:38] <asac> aquarius: what was the problem with that patch?
[11:39] <aquarius> asac, nothing at all, it's just that in addition to JSOPTION_NATIVE_BRANCH_CALLBACK going away, the API to call spidermonkey changed too, meaning that your patch made couch compile fine but the other guys patch makes it actually work :-)
[11:39] <aquarius> this is by no means your fault :)
[11:40] <asac> aquarius: what i asked was : what didnt work?
[11:40] <aquarius> asac, ah, when couch tried to use a JS view function, it threw the error "expression does not evaluate to a function"
[11:41] <asac> ok ... will check the patch then
[11:41] <asac> i mean the one from 288
[11:42] <aquarius> cheers, chief :)
[11:58] <andv> asac, is the guy who did the torbutton fix a new contributor?
[11:58] <andv> asac, if yes I won't run dch -r
[12:03] <andv> asac, contents here: http://paste.debian.net/42831/
[12:20] <asac> andv: sponsoring never involves dch -r
[12:21] <asac> if you change more things you can either take over changelog or be nice and just add you to the changelog
[12:21] <asac> or ask the the guy to fix the patch
[12:21] <andv> asac, dch -r do the work for you
[12:21] <asac> (though if its trivial its not really worth a round)
[12:21] <andv> asac, it creates a path for the previous changer
[12:21] <andv> and adds one for you where you can add your changes
[12:21] <asac> andv: dch -r will take over changelog
[12:21] <asac> thats not sponsoring
[12:21] <andv> asac, no, it creates a [ name ]
[12:22] <andv> path with personal changes
[12:22] <asac> andv: it also takes over ownership
[12:22] <asac> andv: just add that [ ... ]  manually
[12:22] <andv> asac, yes, it's what I did
[12:22] <asac> good. then its fine
[12:22] <andv> just updated timestamp
[12:22] <andv> asac, look at package contents and tell me if they are fine
[12:22] <andv> asac, http://paste.debian.net/42831/
[12:23] <asac> andv: looks fine. if its tested go for it
[12:23] <andv> k
[12:23] <asac> next ;)
[12:23] <asac> ok running some errands and doing lunch
[12:24] <andv> ok, I finish this and I go to prepare lunch too
[12:27] <andv> asac, the diff shows some changes
[12:27] <andv> asac, to torbutton.js
[12:27] <andv> file
[12:27] <andv> -        proxy_host = '127.0.0.1';
[12:27] <andv> +        proxy_host = 'localhost';
[12:27] <andv> is that normal0
[12:27] <andv> ?
[12:27] <andv> e.g it gets auto-generated during build?
[12:29] <andv> asac, it's not on his debdiff so I guess it's auto-generated during build
[12:31] <asac> andv: you are a motu
[12:31] <asac> ;)
[12:32] <andv> asac, I just wanted a clean diff :)
[12:32] <asac> andv: yeah. start with a clean tree
[12:32] <asac> apply the reviewed patch
[12:32] <andv> asac, I know, and I get that change
[12:32] <andv> asac, which is not in his debdiff
[12:33] <andv> asac, the only thing possible is that that file gets auto-generated during build
[12:34] <asac> and just debuild -S
[12:34] <asac>    
[12:34] <asac> andv: yes. loads of packages are bad and dont properly clea n up
[12:34] <asac> thats normal but one shouldnt bother with it when sponsoring
[12:34] <asac> just take care that you dont produce sources from a tree you used to build ;)
[12:34] <asac> its annoying, but thats life :)
[12:35] <andv> asac, yeah, I was just having a look at the diff
[12:35] <andv> and found out that thing
[12:35] <andv> so I asked you if that was normal
[12:35] <andv> nothing more
[12:36] <asac> everytime i do something to packages not done by me i dpkg-source -x ... modify, create sources .... and if i do a binary build for testing i trash the tree again and unpack the dsc
[12:37] <asac> ok bad connection atm
[12:37] <asac> and	well spotted. you are right that diff shouldnt be in teere ;)
[12:37] <asac> ok ... have to run out  and connectivity is gettin worse. will be back in 30 minutes i guess
[12:37] <andv> asac, I leave it as it is?
[12:38] <andv> it's something really minor
[12:38] <andv> asac, want me to push anyway?
[12:39] <andv> asac, I looked at old package previously uploaded
[12:39] <andv> and that change is still there
[12:40] <andv> so I assume it's auto-generated
[12:40] <andv> fine then
[13:26] <asac> andv: a clean debdiff is what we want
[13:26] <asac> andv: dont use _built_ trees to produce the sources
[13:26] <andv> asac, I know
[13:26] <asac> good
[13:26] <andv> asac, I uploaded it more than 30 mins ago
[13:26] <andv> but I received no mails
[13:26] <asac> great
[13:27] <andv> maybe the archive don't recognize my sha-256 key
[13:27] <andv> ...
[13:30] <andv> I'm asking on LP
[13:48] <e-jat> ping fta
[14:15] <exn> hi! why not include jssh support for ubuntu build of mozilla ?
[15:06] <asac> exn: not sure what jssh is ;)
[15:06] <asac> exn: you are asking to have it packaged or to instal it by default?
[15:07] <exn> I'm ask to compile it with this options by default mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=browser
[15:07] <exn> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/firefox-jssh
[15:07] <exn> ac_add_options --enable-extensions=default,jssh,webservices
[15:07] <exn> ac_add_options --enable-application=browser
[15:07] <exn> even redhat has firefox compiled with jssh
[15:08] <exn> asac: yes, it will be cool to have it by default
[15:08] <exn> I'm tired to recompile it every time
[15:09] <exn> and it just option which can be enabled anytime
[15:09] <exn> like  firefox -jssh
[16:18] <asac> exn: since when does jssh exist?
[16:18] <exn> asac ?
[16:20] <asac> since when does it exist
[16:20] <asac> just want to estimate how likely it is that this goes away
[16:21] <asac> in next release or something
[16:21] <asac> we were burned in the past by shisping stuff that upstream does not support
[16:21] <exn> from 1x versions
[16:22] <exn> check it http://tinyurl.com/685tac
[16:22] <exn> there described how to compile it with jssh support
[16:23] <exn> for 3x version
[16:23] <asac> yeah. i will think about it. file a wishlist bug for now
[16:24] <asac> also check if there ar other extensions we might put into a firefox-3.0-extras package or something
[16:24] <exn> after compiling it must looks like this http://pastie.org/561804
[16:24] <asac> well. compiling and doing is not the problem ;)
[16:25] <asac> its just that unsupported stuff shoudlnt be in a firefox build with official branding
[16:25] <asac> i will check with fedora guy, why and how they ship it
[16:26] <asac> so for now: file a wishlist bug ;)
[16:26] <asac> against firefox-3.5
[16:30] <exn> it will  be cool to have jssh immediately after apt-get install =)
[16:30] <exn> I don't know will it be in extras or not
[16:31] <exn> I think no, because xulrunner and libs must be compiled with this option. but I not sure
[16:31] <asac> i will check it. i think its basically just chrome and components
[16:32] <asac> can be shipped outside
[16:32] <asac> otherwise we wont do it i guess
[16:32] <exn> thanks
[16:32] <asac> file bug ... tell me id and I will check when i have time
[17:03] <exn> maybe somebody knows how to run mozilla without an any kind of X ?
[17:04] <asac> exn: any kind of X?
[17:04] <exn> asac , yes, without Xvfb, without desktop
[17:05] <exn> just one process of mozilla and no more
[17:05] <exn> without rendering !
[17:10] <asac> exn:what do you want to do
[17:10] <exn> it's sounds bad, I know. if I will work with it through jssh interface, rendering is not needed, I mean do not need to draw pages anywhere
[17:11] <exn> just disable rendering, or something like this
[17:11] <exn> it's possible ?
[17:12] <asac> exn: why do you want to run firefox just for jssh?
[17:12] <asac> what are you doing with it?
[17:14] <exn> testing javascript
[17:32] <eagles0513875> hey asac
[17:33] <asac> hi exn
[17:33] <asac> hi eagles0513875 ;)
[17:34] <eagles0513875> kde is broken lol woohooo
[17:39] <asac> exn: kde networkmanager?
[17:39] <asac> eagles0513875: ^
[17:39] <asac> (sorry exn)
[17:40] <eagles0513875> no
[17:40] <eagles0513875> the desktop as a whole
[17:40] <asac> eagles0513875: but ou had problems with kde network manager right?
[17:40] <asac> i need you to test something then ;)
[17:41] <eagles0513875> the login is broken there have been a whole bunch of kde updated packages and updating to the latest ones seems to have issues i login then my screen goes blank then all i see is the mouse and black screen nothing shows that the desktop is loading
[18:19] <fta> hi
[18:26] <eagles0513875> hey fta
[18:36] <fta> is it just me or is http://packages.ubuntu.com/ dead?
[18:41] <eagles0513875> what you mena not loading
[18:42] <eagles0513875> fta: sites down
[18:42] <eagles0513875> if you wanna know what is honestly dead is something with kde login
[20:08] <bdrung> asac: did you wrote a test program like http://paste.ubuntu.com/235370/ ?
[20:47] <fta> A    chromium-v8-13149/src/test/mjsunit/proto.js
[20:47] <fta> svn: Decompression of svndiff data failed
[20:47] <fta> make: *** [gos-co] Error 1
[20:48] <fta> forcing a respin of the bot..
[21:05] <erh> is the version of mozjs in xulrunner 1.9.1 supposed to be the same as spider monkey 1.8?
[21:05] <erh> i'm getting some weird differences between them - including a symbol being in the headers but in the library
[21:30] <BUGabundo> hey hey hey . guud evening
[21:30]  * BUGabundo is Happy.... enjoy while you can :D
[21:32] <micahg> BUGabundo: is BUGaBOTdo a better nick?
[21:33]  * BUGabundo ignores Mika
[21:38] <asac> bdrung_: something similar ... more complete
[21:39] <asac> bdrung_: but in sh ;)
[21:39] <asac> and done manually. but i dont think that there is much need to extend the test much
[21:39] <asac> i mean manually as yours, but i also test gt ge for instance nd le
[21:40] <asac> erh: i dont know about js versioning
[21:51] <erh> asac: the really weird thing is that there is a symbol in a header file js_RegExpClass that is not in libmozjs.so  when i build spider monkey myself, its in the library
[21:55] <bdrung_> asac: i only tested the cases listed on the website
[22:01] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/235432/
[22:03] <BUGabundo> identica is down!!!
[22:03] <BUGabundo> who will have I to nag now ?!!?
[22:03] <BUGabundo> OMG OMG OMG
[22:05] <micahg> BUGabundo: I thought it was distributed so it can't go down
[22:06] <BUGabundo> Laconica support OMB and Federation it is
[22:07] <BUGabundo> *but* identica is just ONE service
[22:07] <BUGabundo> it can go and has been down
[22:09] <fta> you killed it
[22:10] <BUGabundo> damn it
[22:10] <BUGabundo> GMail spend the entire day killing my FF
[22:10] <BUGabundo> both here on 3.6
[22:11] <BUGabundo> and on debian iceweasel 3.0.9
[22:11] <BUGabundo> stupid gmail
[22:12] <fta> BUGabundo, so you're using debian now?
[22:13] <BUGabundo> at work
[22:13] <BUGabundo> I told you that like 3 weeks ago
[22:16] <fta> BUGabundo, now that i've unsubscribed from your dents, i may pay more attention to what you actually say ;)
[22:16] <BUGabundo> I said it HERE
[22:16] <BUGabundo> fta: you shameless ex-follower :(
[22:16] <fta> no offense ;)
[22:17] <BUGabundo> fta: http://www.brainbird.co.cc/bugabundo
[22:17] <BUGabundo> sub to me there
[22:17] <BUGabundo> much less _noise_
[22:17] <fta> i'm only on identi.ca
[22:18] <BUGabundo> so?
[22:18] <BUGabundo> its federated!!
[22:18] <BUGabundo> duh
[22:19] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[22:19] <BUGabundo> I'm subbed to ppl on at least 5 other Laconica servers
[22:19] <BUGabundo> from my identica account
[22:19] <BUGabundo> actually my identica and my brainbird are subbed to each other
[22:19] <BUGabundo> LOL
[22:19] <fta> Incorrect username or password.
[22:20] <fta> how do i know they didn't collect my password in the process?
[22:20] <fta> shame!
[22:21] <BUGabundo> ahh?
[22:21] <BUGabundo> what ppassword?
[22:21] <BUGabundo> you should have been returned to your idenitca accont
[22:21] <BUGabundo> you are pressing the worng button
[22:21] <BUGabundo> let me sign out to give you the DIRECT link
[22:21] <BUGabundo> http://www.brainbird.co.cc/main/remote?nickname=bugabundo
[22:22] <BUGabundo> no enter http://identi.ca/fta in the 2nd field
[22:23] <BUGabundo> No suitable nodes are available to serve your request.
[22:23] <BUGabundo> GRRRR
[22:23] <pace_t_zulu> http://mashable.com/2009/07/27/firefox-40/ <- anyone see the chromium/chrome resemblance?
[22:24] <BUGabundo> fta: see it now ?
[22:24] <BUGabundo> assuming Identica is up
[22:25] <fta> nope, nada, i gave up
[22:25] <BUGabundo> :(
[22:25] <BUGabundo> try again later
[22:25] <BUGabundo> when its up
[22:25] <fta> pace_t_zulu, ff 4.0? ff 3.7? wtf is that?
[22:25] <BUGabundo> did you undertood how to sub to a remote account fta?
[22:25] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu: saw it and read all about tit
[22:26] <BUGabundo> fta: mockups of the next looks of FF
[22:26] <BUGabundo> on version 3.7
[22:26] <BUGabundo> that will lead to 4.
[22:27] <pace_t_zulu> they borrowed liberally from google
[22:27] <fta> why not, chromium borrows a lot from firefox
[22:28] <BUGabundo> ahahahah
[22:29] <pace_t_zulu> fta: +1
[22:30] <asac> bdrung_: its ok. i tested almost everything. its good. i will commit it ... thanks!
[22:30] <asac> erh: how do you checkout/build spidermonkey
[22:30] <asac> ?
[22:34] <fta> asac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16800#c17
[22:34] <fta> so system v8 is a problem...
[22:56] <asac> fta: please disable shred build for now
[22:56] <asac> but keep v8
[22:56] <fta> it's off
[22:56] <fta> i never enabled shared build
[22:57] <asac> ok
[22:57] <asac> fta: i dont understand the problem though
[22:58] <asac> can you explain what exactly is broken now?
[23:00] <fta> localtime is called by v8, but the binary being jailed (sandboxed), it doesn't have access to /etc/localtime so fails to apply the correct tz
[23:01] <asac> fta: aha. how does jailing work?
[23:01] <asac> which binary is being jailed?
[23:01] <asac> how do they detect in which binary they are (code wise)
[23:01] <fta> it's a chroot on an empty dir (deleted dir)
[23:02] <asac> is there some document online? that gives an overwivew?
[23:03] <fta> chromium searches for chromium-sandbox, if it finds it, it starts from there, then all children (the renderers) are jailed
[23:03] <fta> yes, most probably
[23:03] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxSUIDSandbox
[23:08] <BUGabundo> fta: http://www.brainbird.co.cc/main/remote?nickname=bugabundo
[23:08] <BUGabundo> can you try now?
[23:08] <BUGabundo> and enter http://identi.ca/fta in the 2nd field
[23:12] <asac> fta: yeah. but seems its not many cases that this breaks. in general it works pretty well
[23:12] <asac> i will check the links though. thanks!
[23:13] <fta> asac, run javascript:alert(new Date().getTimezoneOffset())
[23:13] <bdrung_> asac: can you push the branch?
[23:15] <fta> BUGabundo, Bad Request, No authorization request!
[23:15] <BUGabundo> grrr
[23:15] <BUGabundo> this is supposed to be easy
[23:15] <BUGabundo> I've done it 250 times before
[23:16] <BUGabundo> fta: are you loggin on identica??
[23:17] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/235480/
[23:17] <fta> BUGabundo, of course i am
[23:18] <BUGabundo> are you sure ? :p
[23:19] <BUGabundo> fta: (11:17:33 PM) shiny: remote subscriptions are..... flakey
[23:19] <BUGabundo> (11:18:12 PM) evanpro: shiny: I think there's a problem with the session storage
[23:23] <asac> bdrung_: urgently? i am not logged onto the system.
[23:23] <fta> asac, i will disable it for now, please experiment in a sandbox ppa
[23:24] <asac> fta: well. what i wanted the daily builds for atm is to track how well abi/api works
[23:24] <asac> i cannot do that in a sandbox
[23:24] <asac> for me the current regression seems ok. but if you think its too bad go ahead
[23:25] <asac> but good to see that they plant to stabilize v8
[23:26] <asac> on their own
[23:26] <fta> asac, my plan was always to push upstream to do the right thing for us, even if i sometimes have to do the patch, and use that *when it's ready*, but never to enable stuff before they are accepted
[23:26] <asac> and settle on 1.2 branch
[23:26] <asac> fta: the discussion i read didnt sounded like they would care much about sonames for now
[23:26] <fta> asac, many people use chromium with gmail, so their emails have a busted date
[23:27] <fta> soname is a different topic, it's about system libs here
[23:27] <asac> if upstream says they will do stable abi stuff for v8 its ok. i wont bother to put any work in this. but your paste is the first i see that they want to do that
[23:28] <asac> fta: yes. but what i did i didnt do for the sake of ssytem libs it was for the sake of checking how abi works out
[23:28] <asac> not for chomium, but to check if v8 can be a viable alternative for mozjs in the archive and the freesoftware that needs js
[23:28] <asac> chromium wsa just a good build target to check if soname breaks
[23:28] <asac> far better than the shell testcase they proposed imo as it is massive real live usage
[23:28] <fta> asac, as i said many times, webkit, v8 and skia should be the last libs we should try to get in, because they are the ones that are not ready
[23:30] <asac> all the rest isnt important for the distro
[23:30] <asac> v8 is what i want to understand
[23:30] <asac> we have a pressing need to get any stable js lib
[23:30] <asac> but we have none
[23:30] <asac> the v8 api looked simple enough to be trackable thats what i did here ;)
[23:30] <bdrung> asac: it not urgently.
[23:30] <asac> bdrung: just want to test or to improve the rest?
[23:31] <asac> bdrung: i didnt modify your patch so you can work on top of that
[23:32] <bdrung> asac: i only replaced the dpkg command by mozcmp and added an "a" to the comparision for maxversion.
[23:32] <asac> fta: anyway today i made some political progress on the mozjs abi front so the urgency of v8 might drop again
[23:32] <fta> asac, i'm all for experimenting stuff, but not when it's a confirmed regression for users
[23:33] <asac> fta: sure. i wasnt aware about the regressions. for me it looks ignorable for daily build archive (not in a release archive for sure). but its your decision
[23:33] <fta> asac, what else would use v8 anyway? it's not even complete
[23:33] <bdrung> asac: s/it/it's/
[23:33] <asac> fta: what is missing its a js engine that works good enough fo r abrowser
[23:34] <asac> so its probably good enough for almost everything
[23:34] <fta> asac, well, the problem is that we just have those daily builds, nothing else, so all users are using the same thing, and they will eventually suffer from our experiments
[23:34] <asac> seems like you can do all the basics like definining functions objects, running them
[23:35] <asac> fta: i understand and its your decision because you drive this. maybe we can make the packageing smart so that it will pick up system v8 in a repository that has v8 in it
[23:35] <asac> and move the daily v8 to some other ppa
[23:35] <fta> eh?? "fo r abrowser" ? you mean the unbranded firefox? you want to swap the js engine??
[23:35] <asac> in that way i could regularly copy over
[23:35] <asac> fta: for a browser == its used by chromium. its definitly complete enough to be used
[23:36] <asac> fta: i didnt want to say that another browser should use it. what i meant was that for apps that need it now (like couchdb, google gadgedts) its definitly complete enough
[23:36] <fta> yeah maybe, then try it there, chromium has obviously troubles with it
[23:36] <asac> though to some degree i feel tempted to build ephy webkit against chromium webkit ;)
[23:37] <asac> fta: those apps do not exist yet. i need chromium to test how good the abi is
[23:37] <fta> try
[23:37] <asac> so i can suggest folks to use that and promote it in the archive.
[23:37] <asac> i will check what we can do.
[23:38] <fta> v8 could probably already go, it has everything now
[23:38] <asac> what i want i sthat i can copy chromium browser to a special ppa where it at best would pick up libv8 system
[23:38] <bdrung> asac: good night
[23:38] <asac> fta: thats what i mean. and i didnt want to experiment weith chrome because of chrome, just beacuse its a great app that probably uses most symbols and so we would see abi breakage
[23:39] <fta> asac, maybe you should make more use of the testsuites
[23:39] <bdrung> asac: it looks like the whole mozcmp works. i will do more testing the day after tomorrow
[23:40] <fta> mozcmp?
[23:40] <bdrung> fta: look here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/234812/
[23:41] <bdrung> fta: it compares mozilla versions.
[23:41] <bdrung> fta: it's the current working title.
[23:41] <asac> fta: yes. you can do it right with testsuites too probably. but they just have the shell from what i understand and not so extensive api tests
[23:41] <fta> xul already has that
[23:41] <asac> and the shell most likely doesnt touch enough
[23:42] <e-jat> ping fta
[23:42] <asac> fta: which script does provide it. i dont know of any
[23:42] <asac> i only know of C code
[23:43] <e-jat> fta: can chrome use pdf plugin?
[23:43] <fta> asac, i assume the v8 testsuite tests everything, and as for chromium, it should too, gaps should be filled in
[23:43] <fta> e-jat, no idea, i never tried
[23:44] <e-jat> even it wont try to download its ..
[23:44] <e-jat> example : slideshare.net
[23:46] <fta> e-jat, wfm, i mean, when i click on a pdf, it offers me to save it, i accept, then it's also in the dl bar at the bottom, if it click it there, my preferred pdf viewer opens up
[23:47] <e-jat> owh ok ..
[23:48] <fta> it's not *nice* but it works
[23:50] <asac_> reconnect
[23:50] <asac_> fta: i think he wants an embedded pdf viewer (guess he already told that though)
[23:51] <fta> asac_, as i said, i don't know. i don't use any even with firefox
[23:52] <asac_> ok
[23:54] <asac__> ok
[23:54] <e-jat> asac & fta : it not necessary to embedded it :) ... just curious why mine is not offer me to save it ... its ok .. ill keep try it
[23:55] <fta> maybe you auto-accept all dls
[23:55] <fta> try ~/Downloads/
[23:55] <fta> (i should change that back to our default btw)
[23:55] <e-jat> fta: another thing is ... is it i need to manually add the SSL cert for the website that they self generate?
[23:56] <asac__> auto-safe or not auto-safe by default?
[23:56] <asac__> fta: does chromium already treat .deb files as unsafe downloads? e.g. only offers to save and not gdebi?
[23:56] <fta> asac__, i think it's off by default
[23:56] <asac__> yeah. i think it should be on ;) ... and honour XDG ... lol ;)
[23:57] <fta> not sure it's ready
[23:57] <fta> same for ssl
[23:57] <asac__> whats not ready? unsafe downloads?
[23:57] <fta> you know you can file bugs, right?
[23:57] <asac__> whats the problem with ssl right now?
[23:58] <asac__> i wouldnt file a bug to find out if a feature is already implemented ;)
[23:59] <fta> e-jat, well, for self signed certs, i get something similar in ff
[23:59] <e-jat> hmm ..