/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/07/31/#ubuntu-ports.txt

NCommanderlamont, you around?14:52
lamontyeah14:52
NCommanderlamont, question, what does it take to get a new port of Ubuntu off the ground so the speak14:52
NCommander(in an official way)14:52
lamonthardware for the DC, and a working bootstrap world, plus people working on it14:53
lamontat a minimum14:53
NCommanderlamont, see PM :-)14:55
jbaileyNCommander, Awww.  You're not gonna share?19:40
jbaileylamont, You forgot the critical bits of overcoming James' hatred for the port and convincing kernel + toolchain people that you're not a muppet.19:41
lamontjbailey: that was encapsulated in the "at a minimum" :-p19:43
jbaileylamont, You left out the hardest part.19:44
jbaileyOtherwise we'd have m68k already, wouldn't we? =)19:44
lamontas for the kernel/toolchain, the port must provide a responsible muppet^Wporter of sufficient competence to at least get James back to neutral from hating the port for the drain that it is otherwise.19:44
lamontalso, the port needs to be to a point where it reliably runs, even when building gcc and glibc (and openoffice/java??)19:45
jbaileyI was more thinking that you probably want commit access to the kernel and the toolchain.19:45
jbaileyYeah, Java's pretty standard these days.19:45
jbaileyYou have a pile of VMs to port if they don't work: Python, Java, Mono, Guile.19:45
jbaileyThey're all in main these days.19:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!