[01:18] <charles_> kklimonda: do you have an opinion on #407692
[01:19] <kklimonda> bug 407692
[01:19] <kklimonda> icon?
[01:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 407692 in transmission "Icon for Transmission does not suggest the program's purpose" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/407692
[01:19] <charles_> imo it rates as a low-priority wishlist item
[01:20] <charles_> cute that, in the screenshot he provides, the same problem exists for firefox, pidgin, and ekiga
[01:20] <charles_> I don't know how you make a 20x20 icon that conveys the idea of bittorrent
[01:21] <kklimonda> Well, that's the problem - you can't really present a torrent in any meaningful way as an icon
[01:21] <charles_> I also don't know of *any* bittorrent client that has an icon that would pass the HiG
[01:21] <kklimonda> exactly, I was just writing it in my comment :)
[01:21] <charles_> given that nobody knows how to solve it, and it's a wishlist item, I'd mark it as incomplete and ask them to provide an icon.  or maybe that's too harsh?
[01:22] <yoasif> kklimonda, did i ever talk to you about my website?
[01:22] <kklimonda> yoasif: I don't think so
[01:23] <BUGabundo> charles_: LOL
[01:23] <BUGabundo> guys nighty night
[01:23] <BUGabundo> [[]]
[01:24] <kklimonda> charles_: hmm.. good question. Marking it as incomplete would hide a bug from search..
[01:24] <kklimonda> erm, no
[01:24] <kklimonda> damn, it's too late
[01:25] <kklimonda> please, kick me under the table when you see me babling without any sense
[01:25] <kklimonda> charles_: on the other hand Empathy has a pretty meaningful icon so I think at least some teams are thinking about it.
[01:26] <kklimonda> charles_: (ekiga and pidgin were dropped from karmic koala)
[01:35] <kklimonda> charles_: I'd confirm it (as I agree with op that this is an issue), set as wishlist and add some sort of tag.. but I don't know if there is anything like "artwork-needed" tag used..
[01:37] <kklimonda> hggdh, bdmurray: Is there a tag for bugs that require a new piece of artwork (like a new icon for bug 407692)? Something like "artwork-needed"
[01:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 407692 in transmission "Icon for Transmission does not suggest the program's purpose" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/407692
[01:39] <kklimonda> charles_:  But to be honest I don't see anyone providing a good, meaningful alternative for it.. grr.. stupid usability bugs.. ;)
[04:38] <hggdh> kklimonda, no, no such tag
[06:13] <micahg> anyone here running karmic?
[06:14] <Hobbsee> sort of, why?
[06:14] <Hobbsee> #ubuntu+1 has a stack of people running karmic
[06:15] <micahg> :)
[06:15] <micahg> it's for bug triage :)
[06:15] <micahg> bug 407421 just seems weird
[06:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 407421 in firefox-3.5 "firefox-3.5 exits normally when Ctrl + C pressed." [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/407421
[06:21] <kklimonda> micahg: I can't reproduce it on karmic
[06:22] <micahg> figured...
[06:22] <micahg> thank kklimonda
[06:22] <micahg> *thanks
[06:24] <bcurtiswx> micahg: not able to reproduce
[06:26] <micahg> ok, I'm having the user try a new profile
[06:26] <micahg> thanks
[06:26] <bcurtiswx> yup :)
[06:48] <kklimonda> hey, any idea how to debug a kernel oops? nothing in logs, oops is too long so I can't take a photo
[06:48] <kklimonda> neither do I get a /var/crash/vmcore
[06:50] <micahg> you check the wiki already?
[06:51] <kklimonda> micahg: doing it right now
[06:52] <kklimonda> Wasn't it more automatic earlier?
[06:53] <kklimonda> or was linux-crashdump just installed by default?
[06:53] <micahg> you mean apport?
[06:53] <micahg> it might not be enabled for karmic yet?
[06:53] <kklimonda> micahg: no - kernel crash reports
[06:53] <micahg> apport usually generates them for me on Jaunty
[06:54] <kklimonda> I remember seeing an apport dialog after bad suspend/resume in jaunty beta
[06:54] <micahg> yeah, karmic is only alpha3
[06:54] <micahg> you can enable it if you want
[06:54] <kklimonda> but now that I read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/CrashdumpRecipe a linux-crashdump package is mentioned
[06:54] <kklimonda> nah, apport is enabled by default now :)
[06:54] <kklimonda> brb, reboot
[06:54] <micahg> already?
[06:54] <micahg> ok
[07:00] <kklimonda> yeah, It worked now
[09:02] <micahg> do we link multiple bugs to blueprints?
[09:04] <micahg> nevermind...
[09:19] <kklimonda> when bug is fixed in development release but was reported for latest stable should I nominate it for stable release?
[09:20] <kklimonda> right, As I though
[09:20] <kklimonda> t
[09:23] <micahg> well
[09:23] <micahg> it depends
[09:23] <micahg> on if it qualifies for an SRU
[09:37] <andol> kklimonda: See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for more information
[10:36] <BUGabundo> morning !
[10:36] <Hellow> Morning BUGabundo.
[10:38] <BUGabundo> hey Hellow, hello
[10:38] <Hellow> XD
[10:40] <thekorn> good morning BUGabundo and Hellow
[10:41] <BUGabundo> hey thekorn
[10:41] <Hellow> Morning thekorn
[13:31] <bdmurray> kklimonda: needs-artwork actually
[13:52] <yofel> hm, anyone an idea what could cause the apport error in bug 405817
[13:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 405817 in linux "system beep" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/405817
[14:09] <thekorn> yofel, I'm not sure, but maybe the user has given apport-collect a read-only permission
[14:10] <thekorn> so he get this 401 when apport tries to add data to the bugreport
[18:28] <greg-g> ogasawara: re bug 245520, that russian post was just a spam comment. Your call on closing the bug due to unresponsive submitter (since jan. 22nd, 2009)
[18:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 245520 in linux "acpi function not work correctly" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/245520