[01:33] <PhilippeVoinov> sorry, I'm new to the ubuntu art comumunity. I have a question - If I want to make some art (eg. an ubuntu/gimp) splash I make a wiki page for it, right?
[06:16] <Philippe_Voionv> Sorry, im kind of new to ubuntu art stuff. I made a splash for gimp 2.6 on ubuntu. Do I post it on the art wiki or something?
[06:20] <BHSPitMonkey> Philippe_Voionv: wouldn't you send that kind of thing to the Gimp project?
[06:37] <darkmatter> BHSPitMonkey: I think that would depend on whether or not the splash is generic or ubuntu specific
[06:38] <BHSPitMonkey> I, for one, am against customizing apps' splash screens in distros :(
[06:38]  * BHSPitMonkey shudders at the orange OO.o splash
[06:40] <darkmatter> BHSPitMonkey: hmmm... I don't know if I agree. it's a matter of 'does it work'. opensuse manages to make it work. plus it does add consistency to the distro.. but yeah.. the whole 'vomit orange' trend is disturbing
[06:41] <BHSPitMonkey> It wouldn't be as horrific if ubuntu REALLY integrated the styles
[06:41] <BHSPitMonkey> Like the splash screens in Adobe's various Creative Suite programs
[06:41] <darkmatter> yeah
[06:41] <darkmatter> brb
[06:41] <BHSPitMonkey> But these are all just, "Let's take the app's existing splash and tint it orange"
[08:50] <kwwii> BHSPitMonkey: actually, the current OOo splash is not simply the blue one made orange, we spent quite some time making a splash which Sun would accept
[08:50] <kwwii> but anyway, time for a meeting
[08:51] <BHSPitMonkey> kwwii: I understand that, but it might as well be that way
[08:56] <kwwii> we have a policy of not branding any splash screens in order to help the variants keep their branding clear
[08:57] <kwwii> so the slightest way we could brand the OOo screen was to change the design and the colors (ie we did not want to add an ubuntu logo)
[08:58] <BHSPitMonkey> My opinion remains that they shouldn't be branded at all :(
[09:04] <kwwii> ;)
=== You're now known as ubuntulog
[14:08] <andreasn> mac_v, #408361 excellent! Will add some applications
[14:08] <mac_v> :)
[14:09] <mac_v> damn bot, bug #408361
[14:09] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 408361 in nautilus "Applications need to use "gtk_image_menu_item_set_always_show_image" for essential icons." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/408361
[14:19] <mac_v> andreasn: wanted to ask you-> where can i find the src of the gnome > /devices/ac-adapter.png ?
[14:19] <mac_v> svg
[14:20] <andreasn> hm, sounds like gnome-power-manager
[14:20] <andreasn> what's the exact url, I can't seem to locate it
[14:21] <andreasn> /usr/share/icons/gnome?
[14:22] <mac_v> andreasn: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-icon-theme/diff/256x256/devices/ac-adapter.png?h=one-canvas&id=621dd282948d60b1732946e38a5d9d8acbc7a548
[14:22] <mac_v> /usr/share/icons/gnome --- yup
[14:23] <andreasn> oh, it's in the one-canvas branch
[14:23] <andreasn> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-icon-theme/tree/src/battery.svg?h=one-canvas&id=621dd282948d60b1732946e38a5d9d8acbc7a548
[14:23] <andreasn> there
[14:26] <mac_v> andreasn: ah... ! the label threw me off! i was looking for ac-adapter! thanx
[14:29] <andreasn> yes, they are grouped together in not always logical ways :)
[14:31] <mac_v> andreasn: when will these icons be updated for the end-user?
[14:31] <andreasn> I think we'll be able to merge it into the main branch for 2.28, but I can't tell for sure
[14:31] <mac_v> also the flash ,when used with a light panel background[default ubuntu panel] doesnt display well
[14:32] <andreasn> when is the GNOME freeze now again? like late august?
[14:32] <mac_v> i'm not sure
[16:23] <MadsRH> Does anyone know where I can find a SVG version of the Empathy logo in a non-Tango version?
[16:52] <FLOZz> Hello all  \o_