[02:33] <bdrung_> asac: i can't suppress quivering fingers. i had to add the oneliner.
[02:34] <bdrung_> asac: look here https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/mozilla-devscripts/moz-version
[09:11] <asac> 'morning
[09:19] <asac> sparc - ulrunner-1.9.1-1.9.1.2+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/js/src/./nanojit/Assembler.cpp:975: undefined reference to `sync_instruction_memory'
[10:09] <bdrung_> asac: morning. saw my changes to -devscripts?
[10:16] <asac> bdrung_: i saw your ping ;) .... but didnti come to it yet. did you request another merge?
[10:16] <asac> hi
[10:17] <bdrung_> asac: no, i pushed it into the same branch.
[10:21] <mac_v> hi... i keep getting this error when using apport > http://paste.ubuntu.com/248524/
[10:22] <mac_v> how do i correct it?
[10:28] <mac_v> asac: ^ ?
[10:31] <asac> mac_v: yeah.
[10:31] <asac> mac_v: its a bug. i hav ea bandaid fix for it which is in firefox-3.6 branch for now
[10:32] <asac> mac_v: but actually it went away here like 1 or 2 days ago .... are you on up-to-date karmic?
[10:32] <mac_v> asac: i'v lost a couple of firefox reports because of that ,
[10:32] <mac_v> system is up-to date
[10:33] <mac_v> firefox-3.5.2
[10:33] <asac> mac_v: yeah. sorry about that. i didnt want to hide this bug with the bandaid for now
[10:33] <asac> mac_v: the firefox-3.6 dailies shouldnt have that problem though
[10:33] <asac> mac_v: are you using any mirror?
[10:33] <asac> mac_v: might be that your mirror is lacking behind
[10:33] <mac_v> asac: no mirrors
[10:33] <asac> as i said, i always saw that all the time and its gone
[10:33] <asac> hmm ... odd
[10:34] <asac> let me get you the bug id
[10:34] <mac_v> asac: asac: the problem is when firefox is not open, if i open firefox first ,this problem doesnt happen always
[10:35] <asac> mac_v: ack
[10:35] <asac> bug 401055
[10:35] <asac> mac_v: the problem only happens if firefox isnt running
[10:35] <asac> mac_v: so try to open until it work and keep it open for now
[10:37] <mac_v> asac: that was my workaround so long , but recent firefox update 3.5.2 , has changed something , this happened couple of times with firefox open also
[10:37] <mac_v> asac: the firefox3.5.2 is not closing properly , i tried to submit the bug , but the latest apport overwrote the report!
[10:38] <mac_v> in 3hrs firefox crashed twice!
[10:38] <mac_v> from not properly closing
[11:03] <gnomefreak> asac: how do i make ......ubuntu3 higher than ...... ubuntu6?
[11:03] <gnomefreak> i scred up and would love to fix it. im assuming skipping ubuntu# is not a great idea
[11:13] <andv> asac, all-in-one sidebar uploaded plus bugmail pushed to new too
[11:14] <andv> the guys who worked on them were nice and wanted to learn more without dropping the ball at the first problem
[11:14] <andv> the learnt from you
[11:14] <andv> I guess
[11:14] <andv> ;)
[11:26] <asac> andv: oh bugmail ... nice.
[11:27] <andv> asac, an archive admin should process it
[11:27] <andv> dunno in which day they do that
[11:42] <TankEnMate> i suspect this question has been asked many times before, but how do you turn on PGO for a dpkg build of firefox 3.5?
[11:44] <gnomefreak> find o9ut whot he people were that built it with pgo enabled and have them push to a PPA :) <<< easiest way but i suspect something along the lines of --pgo-enable in rules file but i havent tried it so cant tell you for sure
[12:04] <jdstrand> asac: we looked at ia32-libs, and while in universe, it seems easy enough to refresh, so I shall
[12:09] <asac> jdstrand: thats great news. let me know or something. if you want to stage it in ppa i can call for testing
[12:10] <jdstrand> asac: for hardy, I think I'll just upload-- pitti already did it post release for the openssl issue, so this will only have security updates
[12:11] <asac> jdstrand: openssl issue?
[12:11] <jdstrand> asac: unless I am missing something and you think more needs to be done there
[12:11] <asac> jdstrand: he updated nss because of that or sent a complete new snapshot in?
[12:11] <jdstrand> asac: the openssl back after hardy released: CVE-2008-0166
[12:11] <asac> jdstrand: i think its ok to upload after some happy testing. if you have amd64 you can test with chromium-browser for instance
[12:12] <asac> hmm. guess you dont have 64-bit at hand
[12:12] <jdstrand> no I don't
[12:12] <asac> jdstrand: ok kenvandine has a 64-bit laptop
[12:13] <jdstrand> asac: alright, I'll get it somewhere then and ping you
[12:13] <asac> he even uses chromium
[12:13] <jdstrand> cool
[12:14] <asac> so perfect tester ... and he already agreed
[12:14] <asac> hmm ... hardy ... i guess thats a problem though
[12:14] <asac> maybe i can convince him to setup a chroot
[12:14] <asac> jdstrand:
[12:14] <jdstrand> I plan to do it for hardy-jaunty
[12:15] <jdstrand> I guess I can do karmic too, if noone has done it
[12:15] <asac> jdstrand: we have big problems with creating an updated ia32libs based on current state, so i guess we need to do karmic as well
[12:17] <asac> jdstrand: so he will setup a hardy VM now
[12:17] <asac> jdstrand: but hasnt enough space for the rest.
[12:17] <asac> i guess hardy is most risky? or do we rather want jaunty testing?
[12:17] <jdstrand> asac: just so we are clear-- I will use hardy, hardy-security and hardy-updates for hardy, intrepid, intrepid-security and intrepid-updates for intrepid, ...
[12:18] <jdstrand> asac: so it isn't particularly risky-- it is all stuff that has been thoroughly tested in the main archive for that release
[12:18] <jdstrand> again, unless you think I am missing something
[12:19] <jdstrand> s/main/Ubuntu/
[13:07] <TankEnMate> it would seem that the ubuntu / debian mozilla source doesn't support PGO, it seems like it has been ripped out of the source tree
[13:08] <TankEnMate> I can see plenty of stuff to disable PGO, but there are no instances of build target that should work, the build targets have been remove from the source
[13:11] <gnomefreak> TankEnMate: at this time you are right pgo is not enabled. IIRC this will change in future (not sure when)
[13:11] <TankEnMate> not only is it not enabled, it isn't even in the base source package
[13:12] <TankEnMate> aka it's not removed by build patches, its not there at all..
[13:12] <TankEnMate> I'm d/l'ing the full 3.5.2 source from mozilla and i'm going to graft it onto my current deb build tree..
[13:12] <TankEnMate> it'll probably take ages getting all the build stuff to work, but at least i'll get PGO
[13:15] <TankEnMate> is the ubuntu / debian base package a non-PGO trunk? or is it a handcrafted source tar ball with the PGO stuff ripped out?
[13:30] <gnomefreak> TankEnMate: i dont think upstream builds with PGO either. I know there were/is bugs on it upstream
[13:34] <gnomefreak> TankEnMate: see bug 231708 and mozilla 418866
[13:37] <gnomefreak> maybe that will answer most if not all your PGO concerns
[14:07] <asac> jdstrand: no its ok. go for it
[14:15] <EruditeHermit> fta: thanks, the converter works
[14:15] <gnomefreak> asac: ok im fixing sunbird branch to condense all fixes in ubuntu3 and add the fix for arm gcc
[14:16] <asac> gnomefreak: it seems that there is no more fix needed .... just use the default compiler - at least it seems to work
[14:17] <gnomefreak> asac: ok cool i didnt know if i needed your rules control fix from tb
[14:17] <asac> gnomefreak: if you explicitly use gcc 4.3 atm on armel then you need it
[14:17] <asac> but i think you didnt do that ... better check though
[14:18] <gnomefreak> asac: no i used default
[14:19] <asac> sounds good then
[14:19] <gnomefreak> good than condence revisions and ask you to review and push
[14:19] <gnomefreak> just have to let people know to downgrade to official release
[14:20]  * gnomefreak screwed up when commiting
[14:23] <EruditeHermit> asac: were you the one that said tracemonkey had 64bit enabled already?
[14:38] <luk> someone interested in fixing iceape build failure on mips* in Debian (https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=iceape&ver=1.1.17-1&arch=mips&stamp=1249209663&file=log) aka making sure that only gets linked with position independent code?
[14:40] <gnomefreak> and pushed updated branch
[14:40] <gnomefreak> do we have that same issue in seamonkey in ubuntu?
[14:40]  * gnomefreak doesnt have a mips
[14:42] <luk> making sure something only gets linked with position independent code should not be arch specific unless there is an arch specific build option...
[14:44] <TankEnMate> *ugh* the mozilla build environment is just soo crufty..
[14:49] <luk> ah found it, for mips* it configures to static (without fPIC), that both explains the build failure as well as it being arch specific
[14:53] <TankEnMate> gnomefreak: thanks for the pointers.. i have a version of gcc that is too old..
[14:54] <gnomefreak> TankEnMate: np
[14:54] <fta> asac, http://codereview.chromium.org/164035  so much for the 1.2 branch
[14:55] <gnomefreak> asac: branch should be updated shortly. can you add this to the review and push list
[14:55] <gnomefreak> updated https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x.9.10
[15:07] <gnomefreak> found the nightly builds of lightning now i hope updte-orig will grab it
[15:29] <statik> hi asac, updated branch for you to review when you have a minute bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntuone-control-tower/bindwood/ubuntu/
[15:32] <gnomefreak> why the hell doesnt ./debian/rules update-orig or update-orig source work
[15:33] <gnomefreak> niether does get-orig
[15:34] <gnomefreak> fta: does m-d for sunbird just place the lighting.xpi into sunbird source?
[15:36]  * gnomefreak would prefer to build together but it doesnt seem to use ftp.mozilla and i cant get the update-orig rules to work for some odd reason.
[15:42] <gnomefreak> damn source
[16:09] <asac> EruditeHermit: why?
[16:10] <asac> fta: yeah. is 1.3.6 from trunk?
[16:10] <EruditeHermit> asac: apparently tracemonkey isn't enabled for 64bit builds
[16:13] <gnomefreak> is the git problem in m-d due to the name change of git?
[16:16] <gnomefreak> problems with twitter can be found http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/08/twitter-investigating-site-outage.html
[16:23] <eagles0513875> morning guys
[16:23] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: morning sort of
[16:24] <eagles0513875> how are things looking on the karmic front this morning
[16:24] <gnomefreak> karmic == ok
[16:25] <eagles0513875> woohoo
[16:25] <gnomefreak> dont get too excited i dont have same apps as you
[16:25] <gnomefreak> well maybe a few
[16:26] <gnomefreak> be back sm 2.1 is taking forever need to walk around
[16:53] <gnomefreak> ok running 1 test build of SM2.1 if it fails at all i will be putting it off till next week
[17:02] <asac> jdstrand: do you have ia32libs for hardy somewhere so kenvandine can do a quick test or did you push that already?
[17:02] <jdstrand> asac: I will upload it very soon
[17:03] <asac> EruditeHermit: yes. thought i already said that i was wrong ;)
[17:03] <jdstrand> asac: I uploaded to karmic already
[17:03] <EruditeHermit> asac: oh I didn't see =p
[17:03] <asac> jdstrand: good. if you want kenvandine can do the testing ... he has a 64-bit VM setup now ;)
[17:03] <asac> (for hardy)
[17:03] <jdstrand> asac: cool, it'll be a few minutes
[17:04] <asac> jdstrand: good. let me know where you put it
[17:05] <jdstrand> asac: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive will have it. jaunty is already in there
[17:06] <asac> jdstrand: yeah. we wont have testing for jaunty as it seems. do you have users on it?
[17:06] <asac> i can dent about it ... maybe someone jumps on it then
[17:07] <jdstrand> asac: I can on Tuesday, otherwise I can only download the debs and confirm that the new libs are in there
[17:08] <asac> jdstrand: ok i dont think there might be breakage, but let me dent and see if someone tests it
[17:09] <asac> fta: can you redent http://identi.ca/notice/7672024 please
[17:10] <asac> ?
[17:10] <asac> hmm ... actually it should have been different ... wait a sec
[17:11] <asac> fta: this one: http://identi.ca/notice/7672066
[17:19] <asac> fta: you think you could sponsor gnomefreaks lighting-sunbird merge?
[17:19] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x.9.10
[17:19] <asac> anyone else ;)?
[17:34] <asac> jdstrand: verified ffox 3.5 in jaunty. thanks!
[17:49] <jdstrand> asac: ack
[17:56] <jdstrand> asac: jaunty ff35 and xl191 pushed
[18:04] <jdstrand> asac, kenvandine: fyi, intrepid and hardy ia32-libs uploaded to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa. They aren't finished building yet, but should be soon
[18:04] <jdstrand> heading off now...
[18:50] <andv> bdrung, please forward that change
[18:50] <andv> to Debian
[18:54] <sammy> has anyone else experienced a loss of open tabs after a firefox update?
[18:57] <sammy> I haven't been able to find this bug anywhere on the debian or mozilla bug tracker, so I assume it's ubuntu specific, considering it's happened during the last few updates. though thats an assumption
[19:09] <bdrung> andv: yes, i will. it's already on my todo list
[19:10] <bdrung> andv: thanks for sponsoring and for pointing me to the updated maintainer field specification.
[19:44] <andv> bdrung, np
[19:56] <andv> asac, where is the debdiff?
[19:56] <andv> asac, for the thing to sponsor
[20:04] <pace_t_zulu> fta, you aware of this bug?? it is a funny one http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=18385
[20:05] <andv> asac, I'm off, ping me later with details for the thing to sponsor/review
[21:52] <BUGabundo> hey guys
[22:01] <goldins> why is multisearch enabled by default in 3.5?
[22:01] <BUGabundo> yes
[22:02] <dtchen> see my most recent comment in #ubuntu-devel
[22:03] <dtchen> and, if you haven't already, see asac's blog post on the matter
[22:03] <syn-ack> dtchen, I voiced my opine long ago
[22:04] <syn-ack> I have nothing more to say about it. I came in here to see if the other dude was in here
[22:04] <dtchen> i have no opinion on it, as i don't generally use firefox
[22:04]  * BUGabundo simply disabled it
[22:04] <BUGabundo> dtchen: ? you don't ?
[22:04] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[22:05] <dtchen> however, the prescription for getting some disabled is to _clearly document why something is a use case regression_
[22:05] <syn-ack> BUGabundo, Thats what I did too
[22:05] <goldins> I disabled it too, but it's about to be a pain in my ass
[22:05] <micahg> !multisearch
[22:05] <BUGabundo> I expressed my mind, accept upstream decission and did what I could to minimize on my side
[22:06] <goldins> What I'm about to do to minimize it on my side is install fedora on a bunch of desktops.
[22:06] <dtchen> godspeed, then
[22:06] <micahg> goldins: it's only in the alpha releases in karmic
[22:06] <micahg> it'll be gone by release
[22:06] <goldins> okay
[22:06] <goldins> thanks
[22:07] <micahg> at least I think so...
[22:07] <goldins> wait so firefox3.5 isn't available in 9.04?
[22:07] <micahg> it is
[22:07] <goldins> without multisearch
[22:07] <micahg> as a second version of ff
[22:07] <micahg> yes
[22:07] <dtchen> micahg: i have read no such commitment, so i'm not going to voice as much
[22:07] <micahg> that's correct
[22:07] <goldins> I have it as a second version on karmic
[22:08] <goldins> that is, I tried to install only it, but it installed 3.0 as a dependency
[22:08] <micahg> goldins: that'll be fixed soon
[22:08] <goldins> thanks
[22:08] <micahg> dtchen: yeah, I reread asac's blog post, and there might be some form of multisearch in karmic, but nothing is set in stone
[22:08]  * micahg should be more careful when committing to things
[22:09] <micahg> goldins: I've been using FF3.5 on jaunty for 4 months now
[22:10] <BUGabundo> pff
[22:10] <BUGabundo> I started using FF 3.6 4 months ago
[22:10] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[22:10] <BUGabundo> once 3.5 went beta
[22:10] <BUGabundo> too stable for me :)
[22:13] <pace_t_zulu> BUGabundo: i like running development software
[22:14]  * micahg generally waits for beta before trying new stuff
[22:14] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu: I like testing stuff and help devel
[22:14] <pace_t_zulu> micahg: is it safe to say you aren't running karmic?
[22:14] <micahg> indeed
[22:15] <micahg> I'll upgrade when it hits beta
[22:15]  * micahg has 1 system
[22:15] <micahg> and it needs to be stable
[22:15] <pace_t_zulu> micahg: you'll take BUGabundo's cast offs? ;)
[22:15] <pace_t_zulu> i use virtual machines
[22:15] <pace_t_zulu> the host system is stable
[22:15] <micahg> ah, if I had more time, I might do that
[22:17] <BUGabundo> I ran bare metal
[22:17] <BUGabundo> on my main machine
[22:18] <BUGabundo> only way to nag dtchen about breaking audio
[22:18] <BUGabundo> not that he will fix any thing :p
[22:18] <dtchen> "breaking audio" is about as vague and useless a description as "my foot hurts- make it stop"
[22:19] <micahg> or my firefox is broken
[22:19] <BUGabundo> :D
[22:19] <BUGabundo> dtchen: ok, want more descrition? here we go:
[22:20] <BUGabundo> dtchen: volume below 60% == mute, 50% boot start muted. flat volume sucks! try listening to something at a low volume, it keeps floatoaiting and increasing on it own
[22:20] <BUGabundo> dtchen: having audio at 100% makes it go crazy and go up to 140% or even 200% (like happened once)
[22:20] <dtchen> please complain again after you've upgraded to pulse 1:0.9.16~test4-0ubuntu2
[22:21] <BUGabundo> dtchen: I have to kill pa at least once every 3 h, or it will die and not restart
[22:21] <BUGabundo> ok
[22:21] <BUGabundo> full-upgrading NOW
[22:21] <BUGabundo> The following packages have been kept back:
[22:21] <BUGabundo>   hplip-data libpulse-browse0 libpulse-mainloop-glib0 libpulse0 mobile-broadband-provider-info pulseaudio pulseaudio-esound-compat
[22:21] <BUGabundo>   pulseaudio-module-bluetooth pulseaudio-module-gconf pulseaudio-module-x11 pulseaudio-module-zeroconf{a} pulseaudio-utils
[22:22] <BUGabundo> dtchen: that's enough complaing for today! you have enough bugs to be bother with mine, that I can workaround easilly
[22:23] <BUGabundo> sure I would like to have them fixed for other users not be hit by them, but we lack manpower to do it all
[22:59] <andv> BUGabundo, do you have an handy jaunty installation there?
[23:00] <BUGabundo> jaunty??
[23:00] <andv> yes
[23:00] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[23:00] <BUGabundo> andv: I run cutting edge
[23:00] <BUGabundo> hence my pidgin crashes today
[23:00] <andv> lol
[23:00] <andv> I need 3 ppl with jaunty
[23:00] <andv> to test a backport
[23:00] <andv> :)
[23:01] <pace_t_zulu> andv: i'd help you, but i gotta run to the airport to pick up my gf... ping me later if you still need jaunty people...
[23:01] <pace_t_zulu> andv: fyi.. i run jaunty in a vm... so if your backport requires a native install - sorry
[23:01] <andv> pace_t_zulu, I'll be here for like 1 hour or more
[23:02] <andv> pace_t_zulu, I guess a VM works too
[23:02]  * BUGabundo missread airport with apport
[23:02] <asac> andv: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x.9.10 ... thats gnomefreaks branch. there is no debdiff
[23:02] <BUGabundo> too much bug reporting here
[23:02] <andv> pace_t_zulu, ping me when back please
[23:02] <andv> asac, so it's not a merge
[23:02] <pace_t_zulu> andv: sure
[23:02] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu: I was finding strange how your gf fited in apport
[23:02] <andv> pace_t_zulu, ty
[23:02] <pace_t_zulu> later y'all
[23:02] <andv> BUGabundo, lol
[23:03] <asac> andv: well. if its good i can merge it into the main branch. but i cannot test and build it this week
[23:03] <pace_t_zulu> BUGabundo: i don't know about you... but my gfs are real... ;)
[23:03] <andv> asac, is it huge to build?
[23:03] <asac> basically its building sunbird using his branch .... i guess the orig.tar.gz is in gnomefreaks ppa
[23:03] <asac> andv: its similar to tbird/ffox etc.
[23:03] <andv> damn
[23:03] <andv> more than an hour build
[23:04] <asac> this hotel is so crowded with local people ... all occupying the bar and stuff
[23:04]  * asac feels a bit unhappy
[23:04] <andv> asac, where are you?
[23:04] <asac> dublin
[23:04] <andv> for ubuntu conf?
[23:04] <asac> not conference ... platform team sprint
[23:04] <asac> e.g. sitting together and working on all kind of stuff
[23:05] <andv> how many developers are there?
[23:05] <asac> got massively side trackeedand have to make ffox 3.5 by default happening this week
[23:06] <asac> besides from NM trunk and bluetooth default switch etc.
[23:06] <andv> who works with you on ffox stuff there?
[23:07] <asac> noone ... .thats why i get side tracked so much because everybody wants something else from me
[23:07] <asac> we are about 100
[23:08] <asac> basically all ubuntu employees and a few from other parts of the company (e.g. design team etc.)
[23:08] <andv> all core-devs?
[23:09] <asac> not all core-devs are canonical employees
[23:09] <andv> true
[23:09] <asac> and lots of platform team members are not even motu
[23:09] <andv> oh :D
[23:09] <asac> like kernel folks for instance.... they dont need to upload
[23:09] <andv> asac, they have special permissions
[23:09] <andv> to upload kernel stuff only
[23:10] <asac> yes. but just 2 of them
[23:10] <asac> i think 2 or 3 upload
[23:10] <andv> yeah
[23:10] <asac> kernel team is like 18
[23:10] <andv> anyway I've pushed all-in-one siderbar earlier
[23:10] <asac> yeah saw that. thanks
[23:11] <andv> and bugmail-ext will be processed by jdstrand tomorrow
[23:11] <asac> andv: did you push the branch to ~ubuntu-dev too?
[23:11] <andv> asac, I approved it but it needs your review as well
[23:11] <asac> andv: processed?
[23:11] <asac> ah
[23:11] <asac> its a new package?=
[23:11] <andv> it was NEW
[23:11] <andv> so have to be processed by archive admins
[23:11] <asac> oh ok. right. forgot that jamie is archive admin
[23:12] <andv> and tomorrow is jdstrand turn
[23:12] <andv> to be archive admin
[23:12] <andv> so he will do that
[23:12] <asac> heh. well. i dont know ... but we are all so busy in getting all the stuff together that goes on alpha4 that i owuldnt bet on it getting processed tomorrow
[23:12] <asac> but who knows ;)
[23:13] <asac> i will check with him to see if he has time :)
[23:13] <andv> I told him to ping me when done
[23:13] <andv> then I'll leave for holidays
[23:13] <asac> ok .... doing some work on xulrunner transition now ... - which i couldnt do
[23:14] <andv> like half an a week
[23:14] <asac> nice. enjoy in case we dont talk
[23:14] <andv> do you have anything you need to review/sponsor?
[23:14] <andv> apart from that huge package
[23:15] <asac> wait a sec
[23:16] <asac> andv: you could check if you see any issues with lp:~ubuntuone-control-tower/bindwood/ubuntu
[23:16] <asac> and let me know.
[23:16] <asac> its a firefox extension
[23:16] <asac> so in general simple
[23:17] <asac> so just basic checks like: proper licensing, proper branch layout (e.g. .bzr-builddeb/default.conf ...) etc.
[23:17] <andv> ok
[23:18] <asac> andv: oh ... also there are a bunch of universe packages in the ffox 3.5 transition ppa
[23:18] <asac> andv: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35
[23:18] <asac> those basically need to be checked if they are still up to date with current archive version and get uploaded
[23:18] <asac> if the archive version has been bumped in the meantime they need to be rebased on the other stuff
[23:19] <asac> of course only "green" ones are good candidates
[23:19] <asac> andv: like videolink
[23:19] <asac>  swt-gtk - 3.4-2ubuntu3.0xul191
[23:20] <asac> and miro - 2.0.5-1ubuntu1.xul191
[23:20] <asac> with some luck you just need to get those ..., sign them and upload
[23:20] <asac> all the rest i will do tonight or tomorrow morning i hope
[23:21] <andv> asac, they are all new upst?
[23:21] <asac> no ... almost everything is just .xul19
[23:22] <asac> err 191
[23:22] <asac> so just packaging changes for the xulrunner 1.9 -> 1.9.1 transition
[23:22] <asac> andv: anyway. reviewing the extension from above would be great
[23:23] <asac> andv: so you said you already uploaded all-in-one ... right? or are you waiting on my review (a bit confused now)
[23:23] <andv> asac, all-in-one is already uploaded
[23:23] <andv> you need to review the merge request
[23:24] <andv> for the branch
[23:24] <asac> andv: oh ok.
[23:24] <andv> the extension from above --> lp:~ubuntuone-control-tower/bindwood/ubuntu
[23:24] <andv> ?
[23:24] <asac> yeah
[23:25] <asac> basically do a NEW review on it and tell me if you see anything bad. i will do just a quick review then
[23:25] <andv> is it new?
[23:25] <andv> like bugmail-ext
[23:26] <asac> yes
[23:26] <asac> its new
[23:27] <andv> ok
[23:27] <andv> gonna review it
[23:27] <andv> then send it on my karmic pc
[23:27] <andv> and check if it works
[23:29] <asac> thx
[23:29] <asac> * merged all-in-one-sidebar 0.7.4-0ubuntu2. Thanks to Andrea Veri for noticing it was missing
[23:29] <asac> was that something forgotten in intrepid?
[23:29] <andv> yes
[23:30] <andv> someone lost the changelog entry
[23:30] <asac> ah ok
[23:30] <asac> so just changelog
[23:30] <andv> and watch file
[23:30] <andv> if I remember it right
[23:31] <andv> changes from that revision got lost too
[23:33] <andv> asac, when reviewed/tested should I wait your review too before uploading'
[23:33] <andv> ?
[23:35] <asac> andv: let me know ... i will do a quick check too - better have two reviews on NEW
[23:36] <andv> ok, one thing:
[23:36] <andv> is this necessary firefox (>= 3.5),?
[23:36] <andv> I mean > of 3.5
[23:36] <andv> it could be >=3.0
[23:36] <andv> or is that right?
[23:39] <asac> andv: extension?
[23:40] <andv> asac, im checking the ubuntuone package
[23:40] <andv> bindwood package sorry
[23:41] <asac> andv: for extensions the minimum version should match what is in install.rdf
[23:41] <andv> asac, deps says firefox (>= 3.5)
[23:42] <andv> asac, min e max version are 3.5
[23:42] <andv> asac, so it should be firefox (=3.5)
[23:42] <asac> no
[23:42] <asac> its probably ok
[23:42] <andv> kk
[23:43] <andv> I leave it as it is then
[23:43] <asac> maxversion is 3.5? not 3.5.*
[23:43] <asac> ?
[23:43] <andv> 3.5.*
[23:43] <andv> yes
[23:43] <andv> so (>=) is right
[23:44] <asac> yeah. seems so
[23:44] <andv> apturl (>= 0.1.2ubuntu1), why this particular version?
[23:44] <asac> not sure. note those things down and i will consider that in my review
[23:44] <andv> k
[23:44] <asac> for things i am not sure i will ask the author
[23:45] <asac> hmm. i think te guy copied the control from u bufox ...ok thanks for spotting it... no need to review further
[23:45] <asac> i will tell them they have to do it proper
[23:46] <andv> looked strange
[23:46] <andv> ^^
[23:46] <andv> builds fine
[23:46] <andv> now installing it
[23:46] <andv> is it a ffox ext right?
[23:47] <asac> yes. it syncs bookmarks to couchdb ... so you can sync it using couchdb tools among different systems
[23:47] <fta> asac, http://identi.ca/notice/7690850
[23:47] <asac> a bit similar to weave. just that it doesnt require a server
[23:47] <andv> ok, so it will have an interface for that
[23:48] <asac> fta: hoped it was a ia32libs confirm
[23:49] <andv> asac, installed fine
[23:49] <andv> on ffox3.5
[23:49] <andv> how can I check it works?
[23:49] <andv> can't find any interface on bookmarks
[23:49] <asac_> reconnect :)
 asac, installed fine
 on ffox3.5
 how can I check it works?
 can't find any interface on bookmarks
[23:50] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29963998/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090806r31180%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[23:50] <fta> patch failed
[23:51] <asac_> andv: start firefox -P and create a new profile. all your bookmarks should appear there
[23:51] <andv> k
[23:51] <andv> let me see
[23:52] <asac_> fta: let me check . i am thinking about just dropping that patch
[23:56] <asac_> fta: removed
[23:56] <asac_> ok this lobby is getting too crowded. i hope that dropping this patch didnt require adjusting another patch.
[23:56] <asac_> if so i am sorry ... if i find the time i will try it tomorrow
[23:56] <asac_> cu;)!
[23:57] <andv> asac_: you leaving?