/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/07/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== asac_ is now known as asac
bitplaneanyone around to answer my dumb questions?00:09
bitplanedo packages generally do a "make install" to install something?00:10
bitplaneand is there an equivalent of "make uninstall" or is that something I made up and is completely unconventional00:10
maxb< bitplane> do packages generally do a "make install" to install something?00:11
maxbWell that all depends on how you define "package"00:11
azeem_depends on the Makefile; automake e.g. ships an uninstall target by default00:11
maxband how you define "install"00:11
bitplanewell, currently I do "make" followed by a "make install" to compile, then copy my binaries into the system00:12
maxbUpstream source packages typically provide a "make install"00:12
bitplaneit also calls a script which adds new mime types, installs icons and a desktop file00:12
bitplaneregisters my thumbnailer with gconf, etc00:13
maxbDebian/Ubuntu source packages wrap the upstream source and typically use the "make install" step to install files *into the binary package they are building*00:13
maxbDebian/Ubuntu binary packages go nowhere near "make install" in their installation through dpkg / apt00:14
bitplanehmm okay00:14
bitplaneso packages generally contain binaries for the platform, rather than instructions on how to build them?00:14
bitplanewhich is what pbuilder does?00:15
maxbWell, be careful what you mean when you say "packages". There are source packages, which are the recipes for building binary packages.00:16
maxbAnd there are upstream source tarballs which could concievably be termed "packages" by upstreams00:17
bitplaneah okay, by package i mean whatever is downloaded (deb files?) when I type "apt-get install x"00:17
directhexa source package, typically, contains a "make install" call at one point where the prefix is not /usr or somesuch, but a temporary folder for the build process. these binaries are then copied into a deb archive, and when the deb is installed, they go into /usr00:18
directhex(very very potted summary)00:18
bitplanefantastic, that makes sense00:18
bitplanethanks00:18
=== cprov is now known as cprov-afk
=== tuantub_ is now known as tuantub
LLStarkshi. do i request package updates here?01:28
dtchenno, on Launchpad.01:28
dtchenLLStarks: specifically, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/FAQ#Can%20%3Cpackage%3E%20be%20upgraded?01:31
=== artfwo__ is now known as artfwo
artfwohello! I wonder, are new packages still accepted to karmic through the revu?02:51
artfwohello! I wonder, are new packages still accepted to karmic through the revu?03:50
vorianfor a short while longer artfwo03:54
vorianyou have until August 27th03:55
artfwowell, then I'd like to request a review for http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/scantailor - a Qt-based interactive post-processing tool for scanned books03:55
vorianhrm03:55
vorianthe Qt part sound promising03:55
artfwoit has already been advocated earlier, but rejected from the archive03:56
vorianwhat was the reason?03:56
artfwothere was a CC-licensed icon packed into a GPL binary03:57
vorianyikes03:57
artfwoI have replaced the icon, and this change have been accepted upstream as well03:57
dtchengood work03:58
vorianthat is really worth a look tonight :)03:58
voriani'll see if i can get another motu to check it out as well03:58
artfwoI shall remain online then, in case something needs a quick fix03:59
vorianlibqt-dev is at 4.5.1 right?04:01
micahg!info libqt-deb karmic | vorian04:01
ubottuvorian: Package libqt-deb does not exist in karmic04:01
artfwoit's 4.5.2 now04:01
vorianlex has been busy i see04:03
voriangrr04:04
vorianliboost-test04:05
artfwoyep, the package works with any libboost >= 1.3504:05
artfwothat's why I have put a dependency on the default version04:05
vorianit would be great if libboost1.38 had the test binary04:06
artfwoit does04:06
artfwothere is libboost-test1.38-dev04:06
vorianah, so it does04:07
vorianartfwo: will it build with 1.38?04:07
artfwoyes, I have built a binary yesterday in my PPA04:08
vorianmind changing that in the control then?04:08
artfwoI don't mind, but what the purpose of having a "default" boost metapackage then?04:09
artfwojava package ought to build-depend on default-jdk, why boost cannot be the default?04:09
vorianmost all KDE packages migrated away from the "default" boost during the last cycle04:10
vorianbesides, 1.38 is in main04:10
artfwookay, will do just now04:10
vorianeverything else looks perfecto04:12
artfwogrr, I'm having the "425 Security: Bad IP connecting." error with REVU again04:12
voriannoooo04:13
artfwoI guess it's a problem with my ISP04:14
artfwovorian, there04:21
artfwouploaded with libboost-test1.38-dev04:21
vorianthanks artfwo04:32
vorianartfwo: ack'd04:34
artfwovorian, thanks!04:34
vorianthank you artfwo :)04:34
=== santiago-pgsql is now known as santiago-ve
stochasticis anyone in here familiar with the qmake system?06:24
stochasticIf a copyright notice in a source file reads "Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Sean Bolton and others" is this okay for inclusion? and if there's another sourcefile that reads simply "Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Sean Bolton" do they both need to appear in the debian/copyright file?08:57
artfwoI'd include both of them separately09:03
=== dyfet` is now known as dyfet
qiyongi think the distro is buggy on this10:46
qiyongclamav-daemon (clamd) doesn't start up autoamatically10:46
qiyongno startup links10:47
qiyongthere's K19clamav-daemon10:47
qiyongis that bug?10:47
qiyongthe default installation should have get it right10:47
qiyong# find /etc/rc?.d | grep clamav-d10:48
qiyong/etc/rc0.d/K19clamav-daemon10:48
qiyong/etc/rc1.d/K19clamav-daemon10:48
qiyong/etc/rc2.d/K19clamav-daemon10:48
qiyong/etc/rc3.d/K19clamav-daemon10:48
qiyong/etc/rc4.d/K19clamav-daemon10:48
qiyong/etc/rc5.d/K19clamav-daemon10:48
qiyong/etc/rc6.d/K19clamav-daemon10:49
qiyonganyone confirm me this?10:49
StevenKqiyong: Don't do that!10:50
StevenK!pastebin10:50
ubottupastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. Ubuntu pastebin is at  http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://tinyurl.com/imagebin | !pastebinit to paste directly from  command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic10:50
qiyongStevenK: this chann is silent, paste doesn't hurt?10:52
Hobbseeqiyong: it still does.10:52
Hobbseemainly because people read scrollback10:52
Laneyooh11:01
Laneyis ff 3.5 happening?11:01
daurnimatorevenin11:38
slytherinLaney: what do you mean?11:48
Laneyslytherin: to karmic11:50
Laneyas default11:50
slytherinah that. yes it is.11:51
Laneyexciting11:51
slytherinI am using 3.5 on jaunty and it looks to be faster than 3.0.x11:53
blackmoonwhare i can fing a guide for packaging a kernel module? (i need use module-assistant)12:14
blackmoon*find12:14
directhexyou need to use dkms, not m-a12:14
slytherinblackmoon: AFAIK, module-assistant is deprecated in favour of dkms.12:15
blackmoonah, ok...12:15
blackmoondo you know a guide for packaging with dkms?12:16
directhexhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kernel/DkmsDriverPackage12:17
blackmoondirecthex: thank you12:17
=== cprov-afk is now known as cprov
tsengHi folk, I am currently worknig on bug #40882513:28
ubottuLaunchpad bug 408825 in python-django "security update micro-release" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40882513:28
tsengMarc made some comments about my previous patch13:28
tsengI understand the first 2 comments made about version and changelog formats13:29
tsengbut I am lost with the patch tagging13:29
tsengI have tried reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/PatchSystems and got more lost13:29
geserI guess he meant https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines13:32
tsengso do I just add a bunch of text manually to the finnished patch or is there an automated way?13:34
geserwhich patch system does this package use?13:36
tsengcdbs i think13:36
tsengwhen i type what-patch i get cdbs13:37
tsengthough i have no idea how to use cdbs13:37
azeemtseng: cdbs patches are usually just diffs; so adding a comment on the top according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines should be fine I guess13:39
tsengso - just want to get the order right here:13:40
tsengI applied the upstream patch13:40
tsengdirectly to the code in the tree,13:40
geserno, place the upstream patch in debian/patches13:41
tsengupdated the changelog and debian/controle file13:41
tsengaahh13:41
tsengwill try again13:41
geser(check that it applies: patch --dry-run < debian/patches/yourpatch)13:41
mdeslaurtseng: I use the cdbs-edit-patch tool13:41
mdeslaurtseng: you enter the tree, do something like "cdbs-edit-patch 05_security_xxx.diff, apply the patch, and type "exit"13:43
mdeslaurthe patch should get automatically added to debian/patches13:43
mdeslaurand then, you edit debian/patches in a text editor and add the stuff described in the wiki to the top of the patch13:43
tsengthanks13:43
loic-mIs today REVU day?14:16
loic-mI'd appreciate if a MOTU could review (and hopefully advocate) gmameui, a Gnome front-end for MAME (arcade emulator) at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gmameui14:28
loic-mI'm packaging it within the Debian Games Team, but since the RFS is still on it won't make it in time for Karmic unless I go through REVU14:29
loic-mpackage should be in good shape, there was one review in DGT already14:30
lemonI'm learning to become the MOTU,so what's the first step?14:48
loic-m!MOTU14:51
ubottumotu is short for Masters of the Universe. The brave souls who maintain the packages in the Universe section of Ubuntu. See  http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU14:51
Laneysee topic14:52
lemonthanks for all14:52
=== ejat is now known as e-jat
RoAkSoAxDktrKranz, any luck with lekhonee :=)?17:11
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud
s0nixcan we upgrade a package with dpkg ? (without using -r, -i)17:29
s0nixha, -i replace it automatically. nvm.17:31
xnoxHeya! in which version of debhelper did override_dh_* target appeared?18:10
mrooneyWhoa, 1.9.0-6-0ubuntu1 is newer than 1.9.0-7?18:17
mrooneyDoes apt prefer Ubuntu packages over Debian regardless of version?18:17
pochuno, and it's not18:19
mrooneypochu: oh, then what is going here: http://pastebin.com/m2715c2d518:21
mrooneyam I missing something?18:21
pochuerr, it is18:21
mrooneyhm do you understand why?18:21
pochubecause the upstream version in 1.9.0-7 is 1.9.0 and 7 is the debian revision18:21
pochuand in 1.9.0-6-0ubuntu1, the upstream version is 1.9.0-6 and the debian revision is 0ubuntu118:22
mrooneyoh hm18:22
pochuand 1.9.0-6 is greater than 1.9.018:22
mrooneyI see18:22
mrooneyso I named that PPA version incorrectly?18:22
pochulooks like :-)18:22
mrooneybuggers.18:22
mrooneywhat should it have been?18:22
pochu1.9.0-6ubuntu1~ppa118:23
mrooneyahhhh18:23
mrooneythanks!18:23
mrooneyI guess I should just delete the package from LP18:23
cyphermoxmrooney: when you run lintian on your package, i think it would normally say something like native-package-with-dash-version as a warning18:26
mrooneyah, all those lines scroll by in like .5 seconds18:26
cyphermoxthat's one flag to spot that there could be something wrong18:26
cyphermoxyep :)18:27
jtimbermanmathiaz: ping?18:27
=== AlanB` is now known as AlanB
slytherindirecthex: here by any chance?19:05
directhexyes19:05
directhexuntil the wife finishes changing19:05
slytherindirecthex: remember we discussed about the resolution on my LCD TV?19:06
slytherindo you have time to guide me to fix it?19:06
directhexsorry, no - but i'd direct you towards http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Working_with_Modelines and http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Modeline_Database as a place to start19:07
maxbHi, can anyone point me to simplish source package for something using qmake upstream?19:08
slytherindirecthex: will take a look19:09
quadrisprohi guys19:39
=== nxvl_ is now known as nxvl
=== sommer_ is now known as help
=== help is now known as sommer_
ximionHi everybody!22:26
ximionCould someone please review the smile package at revu? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/smile22:27
ximionThe package should be fine now.22:27
=== janito_ is now known as joaopinto
=== nellery_ is now known as nellery

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!