[01:41] mac_v, Are there many theming papercuts filed? [01:42] Other than the Human theme being ugly =/ [04:17] dashua: i dont think so... [04:18] Just checking out Mr. Doobs boot mockup [04:20] Ok [08:54] kwwii: morning. would you agree on deleting https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Karmic/WINDOW_SWITCHER ? [09:11] thorwil: that looks like a link to the windows guide 0.o hehe... [09:11] thorwil: also , kwwii is on vacation [09:12] thats his bot , spying on us ;p [09:12] mac_v: ah, good to know. ok, then, do you agre on deletion? ;) [09:13] thorwil: sure, delete it... that has nothing to do with artwork! [09:14] thorwil: FYI, kwwii will be on vacation for 3 weeks ;p [09:15] mac_v: afterwards he wants to check the IRC logs of 3 weeks?? 0.o [09:16] yeah... that was his plan ;p , keeping tabs of all of us , the ever seeing eye [10:10] thorwil: did you ask for a purple boot screen... MadsRH has just granted your wish ;p [10:11] mac_v: heh, but no lime! [10:13] mac_v, have a screenshot / video of the purple one? [10:13] MDC2: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Karmic/Boot?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=bootsplash-demo2.jpg [10:16] mac_v, hmm.. strange color... [10:21] i like it it's very close to my own theme [10:24] why so dark colors, whats wrong with bright light happy colors? :-) [10:24] :o) [10:26] you want people to see you're using ubuntu - not that your screen might died - right? [10:27] especially when the theme is so dark (black) its nice with something completely different as background... [10:27] or is that just me? :) [10:28] zniavre: we may have a personal pref , but does that color fit official Ubuntu in anyway? [10:28] color scheme is nt supposed to change from brown? [10:28] no [10:29] ha ok sorry [10:36] :-( [11:03] hi everyone [13:38] mat_t: heya... so whats the boot screen verdict? [14:20] mac_v: I guess we'll wait for more feedback... it's only been a day! [14:42] :) , [15:55] dashua: i guess you havent reported many bugs on lp ? ;p [16:02] ? [16:03] Can you edit the summary? [16:03] =/ [16:04] dashua: anyone can edit the description and title , only the comments cant be edited [16:04] Ah [17:16] Hello all _o/ [17:36] andreasn: hi... i have a doubt... why dont the firefox icons change with themes? [only the folders change] when i asked in firefox , they said its because there is no gtk* icon in the label... is it possible to add symlinks with gtk labels? [17:38] the items that use stock items are: back, forward, stop, reload, print, cut, copy and paste [17:39] what about the history, bookmarks , recent* ? [17:39] and html [17:39] because the stock items are the only things that can be picked up from the system in a reliable manner because there is no way to tell that a complete icon theme is installed [17:39] it pick up the html mimetype up [17:40] and the recent stock icon was added to gtk in, hm, 2.14 or something like that [17:40] andreasn: it doesnt :( , since there is no gtk stock for html [17:40] and the minimum required version for Firefox 3.0 is something like gtk+ 2.8 [17:41] are you sure? Nothing shows up in Preferences > Applications? [17:42] andreasn: those pick up the mime types , but not the bookmarks menu , the html is always the gnome icon [17:42] since there is no gtk stock for html [17:42] meeting, back later! [17:43] oh ok.. :) [19:37] mac_v, oh, it seems you're right. It does only use one style there [19:38] since it's possible to pick up in the preferences dialog there, maybe it's possible in the menus as well [19:38] try dom inspector and check what's going on there [19:40] I can't seem to find the icon in the firefox source, so hm, I wonder what's going on here [19:40] maybe it's a bug [19:44] andreasn: i checked with asac , he said we need to use gtk stock icons for firefox , the icons which change are the gtk icons [19:45] andreasn: his suggestion > so if you come up with a list of icons used that are not in gtk, but that seem to have a valid gnome replacement that would be a good list to poke at [19:45] but what would be the dependency for firefox to rely on? [19:46] gnome-icon-theme? [19:46] yeah [19:47] andreasn: if we add symlinks to the appropriate icon and label the gtk-* correctly , this should fix this problem [19:47] i think :) [19:47] symlinks in gnome-icon-theme? we're trying to get rid of those in the long run [19:48] the only issue I can see is that gnome-icon-theme don't promise any kind of API stability, like GTK+ does [19:48] andreasn: yeah i was thinking symlinks , since the appropriate icons are prsent but are not used , then how do we fix this? [19:49] I really don't know, maybe dobey have some ideas for how to deal with it [19:49] firefox only depends on gtk stock :( [19:49] he's the icon-names person [19:49] oh ok :) [19:51] also, at the time that we did the Firefox 3.0 icon work, most of the distros icon themes mostly differenced for the folder icons and the arrows and stuff [19:51] and I guess that's still the same [19:52] well, there is kde, and stuff intergrate bad there [19:52] and the High Contrast issue [19:52] andreasn: oops... i'm on #ubuntu-desktop , could you join? [19:53] andreasn: ah i guess he is away :(