| Q-FUNK | ogasawara: is there any new kernel for me to test on this Geode LX? :) | 00:55 |
|---|---|---|
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: building it right now | 00:56 |
| Q-FUNK | ah, ok :) | 00:56 |
| Q-FUNK | I would give it a spin before going to bed | 00:56 |
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: sorry for the delay. I'll post a link in the bug when it's ready | 00:56 |
| Q-FUNK | alright :) | 00:56 |
| Q-FUNK | ogasawara: I dunno if this is relevant but, just for the heck, I tried using kernel-package on a 2.6.30 tarball with the 2.6.31-rc5 patch and that LKML guy's config and it failed to build on Karmic. GCC kept on complaining about truncated files during build. | 01:05 |
| Q-FUNK | it built fine using the GCC on Jaunty, though. | 01:06 |
| === spO is now known as joejc | ||
| * ogra scratches head, so why are all udebs built for linux-fsl ? | 09:15 | |
| ogra | i thought tim disabled them | 09:16 |
| apw | ogra i thought there was much upset that they were missing | 11:00 |
| apw | i think they got reenabled cause cjwatson kindly fixed up kernel-wedge to make getting them to work possible in one lifetime | 11:00 |
| === lexical is now known as lexical_afk | ||
| ogra | apw, yeah, it helps a lot, else i would have had to hack around it in the builder scripts, now i'm only missing meta and am done :) | 11:10 |
| apw | i assume that'll be a simple one | 11:10 |
| apw | now that the names are acceptable | 11:10 |
| apw | i assume the kernel works? | 11:10 |
| ogra | havent tested yet | 11:13 |
| ogra | i'll do so after i rolled a rootfs/bootloader for amitk | 11:13 |
| apw | too late to change it a assume now anyhow? | 11:14 |
| ogra | well, its broken anyway | 11:22 |
| ogra | no USB and no NIC | 11:23 |
| apw | ya | 11:23 |
| ogra | but it should boot | 11:23 |
| ogra | as long as it does that i'm happy | 11:23 |
| apw | its probabally to late to do anything about it even if it doesn't boot | 11:40 |
| apw | i assume the archive is basically frozen from today? | 11:40 |
| ogra | later today, yes | 11:41 |
| ogra | but our kernel is in universe ;) | 11:41 |
| ogra | i hacked up the builder scripts, so freeze doesnt affect us ;) | 11:41 |
| ogra | we could upload changes until last minute if needed | 11:41 |
| ogra | but i'm confident it boots, its amits config which i tested already and i dont belive the packaging trashed anything | 11:42 |
| amitk | the lange boards don't have ethernet :/ | 12:00 |
| * amitk looks for usb-ethernet adapters | 12:00 | |
| amitk | apw: did unison work for you? | 12:01 |
| apw | amitk, yeah did thank you, only used it for a small shared directory syncing back the accumulated sprint delta to it,but it seemed to work for me | 12:02 |
| apw | i'll need a bit more time to work out how i want to use it in my existing framework, but its looking useful | 12:02 |
| Q-FUNK | ogasawara: seems that we found our winner :) | 12:05 |
| amitk | apw: I have a .AMIT dir in $HOME. I move all my configs into that dir and symlink it from $HOME. e.g. .muttrc, .xemacs, etc. Then I sync .AMIT to all my machines. | 12:07 |
| amitk | ugly hack, but works. | 12:07 |
| apw | yeah i have something similar going on in general | 12:07 |
| apw | just the sync was mostly one sided there, and this makes it more bi directionally capable | 12:08 |
| ogra | amitk, did the redboot work for you ? | 12:10 |
| amitk | yes | 12:11 |
| ogra | good to know | 12:12 |
| ogra | i was told the lange requires a different redboot | 12:12 |
| ogra | but lool was wrong (or wrongly informed) then | 12:12 |
| apw | it may be documented to require a different one | 12:12 |
| ogra | yes, though it might differ between lange 5.1 and 5.2 | 12:13 |
| apw | indeed | 12:13 |
| amitk | confusing | 12:18 |
| ogra | it gets funnier if you think about the fact that 5.1 is newer than 5.2 :) | 12:19 |
| lool | ogra: Hardware might not work if you're not using Lange's redboot with Lange boards | 12:22 |
| ogra | lool, ah, well, i think the 5.2 is still close enough to the babbage to work with TO2 | 12:23 |
| lool | It might mostly work | 12:23 |
| ogra | 5.1 had more changes afaik | 12:23 |
| lool | 5.1 and 5.2 share the same lange52 tree in the sources we got | 12:23 |
| ogra | as long as it gets the kernel to run it should be fine | 12:23 |
| lool | No | 12:24 |
| ogra | not in redboot | 12:24 |
| lool | In RedBoot too | 12:24 |
| ogra | the redboot i have seen had two binary trees | 12:24 |
| ogra | not sure how much they differ though | 12:24 |
| lool | Yeah one for lange31 and the other for lange 5.x named lange52 | 12:24 |
| * ogra admits he didnt look very close | 12:24 | |
| lool | Ok don't state that I was wrong then | 12:26 |
| lool | (Sorry but it's a bit annoying) | 12:26 |
| ogra | sorry | 12:27 |
| lool | amitk: Lange 5.1 does have Ethernet on the board but it's wired over the USB bus | 12:27 |
| lool | i.e. it's an USB Ethernet adpater soldered on the board | 12:27 |
| ogra | he only has 5.2 | 12:27 |
| ogra | and no babbage anymore | 12:28 |
| ogra | 5.2 only has wireless and no driver | 12:28 |
| amitk | yeah, it is a PITA to develop one since I can't get my kernel over http | 12:30 |
| amitk | s/one/on | 12:30 |
| ogra | thats why i set up the rootfs to be able to use flash-kernel | 12:31 |
| amitk | true, but it requires me to build .debs I guess. | 12:31 |
| ogra | no | 12:31 |
| amitk | ohh? | 12:32 |
| amitk | just copy it to /boot and run flash-kernel, then? | 12:32 |
| ogra | just cp your zImage over the /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-0-babbage | 12:32 |
| amitk | cool | 12:32 |
| ogra | then run flash-kernel and reboot | 12:32 |
| ogra | i forgot to install linux-firmware, you might need that if you want to use a usb NIC | 12:32 |
| lool | ogra: I was responding to the comment that "< amitk> the lange boards don't have ethernet :/" | 12:33 |
| ogra | lool, yeah, i know | 12:33 |
| lool | amitk: You might want to script some fis based script to update your SD card and take it out to write the kernel | 12:34 |
| lool | (In case your kernel doesn't boot and you can't run flash-kernel) | 12:34 |
| lool | That's shorter than serial port pushes | 12:35 |
| lool | amitk: These are old notes I have to do that by hand: http://paste.ubuntu.com/251307/ | 12:35 |
| ogra | amitk, http://paste.ubuntu.com/251308/ | 12:35 |
| lool | You need the redboot-tools package for the fis command | 12:36 |
| ogra | thats what i use with the same setup i gave you | 12:36 |
| ogra | from my laptop | 12:36 |
| lool | amitk: You don't need the padding | 12:36 |
| ogra | rtg, my babbage images will build from universe, that should give us some extra hours for the meta (we can slip the freeze a bit) | 14:31 |
| rtg | bjf, you probably ought to update the meeting page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting | 14:31 |
| rtg | ogra, I'll get the fsl meta package done today | 14:32 |
| ogra | cool | 14:32 |
| rtg | I live to serve | 14:33 |
| bjf | rtg, done, I just had the date of the next meeting hosed, the rest of the info is up to date | 14:38 |
| rtg | bjf, 'tanks | 14:38 |
| lool | rtg: Hey Marvell currently pushed kernel trees to kernel.u.c; do you think it would be an issue if they pushed u-boot as well? | 14:43 |
| rtg | lool, we've plenty of disk. | 14:44 |
| lool | Ok thanks | 14:44 |
| rtg | lool, in general, anything they push should be gplv2. other then that I don't much care. | 14:45 |
| lool | rtg: I'm not sure it's GPL *v2* | 14:45 |
| rtg | lool, its some open source license, right? | 14:45 |
| lool | I rather suspect it's a mixture of GPL versions and perhaps LGPL along; but it's as opensource as u-boot is | 14:45 |
| lool | It is | 14:45 |
| mjg59 | A mix of GPL and LGPL is GPL | 14:46 |
| lool | mjg59: A mix of GPL and LGPL is a mix of GPL and LGPL :) | 14:46 |
| lool | You might mean the binaries are effectively GPL | 14:46 |
| mjg59 | No, I mean the work is GPL. Sections of it may have additional permissions. | 14:46 |
| ogra | rtg, btw, i changed the buildscripts already to use linux-babbage, if you pick any other binary name for meta, please let me know before the freeze is in effect (that has to go to min) | 14:48 |
| ogra | *main | 14:48 |
| rtg | ogra, in fact, I was just researching that. | 14:49 |
| ogra | well, if you use another name, tell me what it will be, livecd-rootfs needs to know the name of the binary for building | 14:49 |
| rtg | ogra, what about updates from Jaunty? the previous meta package binary was linux-image-imx51, etc. | 14:50 |
| ogra | you will need to add conflicts and replaces line in your new control file for the old names | 14:50 |
| ogra | *lines | 14:51 |
| lool | rtg: I personally have objections to the fsl-imx51/babbage names but I think we should fix that post a4 | 14:51 |
| rtg | lool, ogra: well, I'm doing the meta package right now. I might as well choose the names that you guys want. | 14:51 |
| lool | rtg: I'd rather we change the linux image name back to imx51 after a4, but because that was already uploaded and we're in a hurry, it's best to defer to post a4 I think | 14:51 |
| lool | rtg: The linux-image names are incorrect; I prefer if both match at all times and we'll fix it after A4 | 14:52 |
| ogra | rtg, well linux-imx51 would indeed be best and cause least hassle | 14:52 |
| lool | I mean the ABI versionned names | 14:52 |
| lool | I'm not sure it's a good idea to go for a mismatch at this point | 14:52 |
| ogra | lool, lets not confuse this conversation to much, its currently only about meta | 14:52 |
| lool | We might not be seeing the consequences if the ABI versionned name and the meta name dont match | 14:53 |
| ogra | because meta will go in the archive now, while the actual binaries are in already | 14:53 |
| rtg | ok, but I'm getting different input from amitk. How about you guys get together and decide on the final names? In the meantime I'll just name the meta packages *imx51* | 14:53 |
| lool | amitk: What's your input? | 14:53 |
| ogra | ok, i'll change livecd-rootfs back | 14:53 |
| lool | ogra: ? | 14:54 |
| rtg | ogra, just wait until you actually see what gets produced. | 14:54 |
| ogra | rtg, i need to do it before freeze | 14:54 |
| lool | ogra: You dont know what the name will be; just leave it alone until you do? | 14:54 |
| ogra | it affects other arches if i make a typo or something, livecd-rootfs is used by all live images across the board (and in main) | 14:54 |
| rtg | ogra, then tell me the exact package names upon which your livecd build depends. | 14:55 |
| lool | It does not affect other arches if your build fails | 14:55 |
| ogra | lool, i had to add universe today already | 14:55 |
| amitk | lool: send me an email in writing that all imx51 flavours will run on a single kernel and I'll agree to your proposal. IMHO, the distro should only concentrate on the dev boards, not OEM ones. | 14:55 |
| lool | But it does if you do a syntax error yes | 14:55 |
| lool | amitk: Ok | 14:55 |
| ogra | lool, so i changed to what the description of the linux image package says (linux-babbage) with a note that i will change back to what it actually will be | 14:55 |
| lool | amitk: I think the way you present it makes it highly political instead of being simpl technical but I have no problem in putting my views in an email | 14:56 |
| ogra | i just dont want to change livecd-rootfs after the freeze | 14:56 |
| amitk | lool: it _is_ political. Someone is going to come in a few months wanting to enable an OEM board that doesn't work off the same binary. | 14:57 |
| amitk | then we do the naming dance again. | 14:57 |
| rtg | amitk, how can all imx51 flavours run from one kernel? We've already got 2 ARM kernel trees. | 14:57 |
| rtg | aren't they both imx51 variants? | 14:58 |
| amitk | rtg: you are confusing single SoC, multiple boards vs. a branch for each SoC. I think. | 14:58 |
| amitk | in theory, multiple boards _can_ run from a single kernel binary. If the code is written such. | 14:58 |
| rtg | amitk, you are right in that I'm confused :) | 14:59 |
| ogra | rtg, currently all babbage boards run from the imx51 tree ... we would like to add support for lange as well as its the same arch effectively | 14:59 |
| rtg | where does dove fit into that mess? | 14:59 |
| ogra | the current naming scheme would men to have a -babbage flavour and a -lange flavour | 14:59 |
| amitk | rtg: dove == separate SoC from marvell | 14:59 |
| ogra | dove is a different thing | 14:59 |
| rtg | its not imx51 compatible? | 15:00 |
| amitk | ogra: or a -lange flavour aliases to -babbage if that is possible. | 15:00 |
| ogra | having a -babbage and a -lange flavour would effectively enforce us to build two images for each of them (rootf images i mean) | 15:00 |
| ogra | having simply a binary that supports all of imx51 would not cause such probs | 15:01 |
| ogra | and currently it doesnt look like we would actually need any -lange flavour at all, the patches all apply to the imx51 tree without touching babbage stuff afaik | 15:01 |
| ogra | having that two name setup effectively binds the double amount of ressources, costs the double space for images and twice the amount of maintenance | 15:02 |
| amitk | rtg: please don't get distracted by this naming issue for A4. This conversation should _really_ have been brought up after A4. | 15:02 |
| ogra | right | 15:02 |
| ogra | it's nothing to have now, binary kernels are up now and wont change atm | 15:03 |
| rtg | amitk, ogra: ok, I'm gonna email the meta naming convention so that you have it in writing. | 15:03 |
| ogra | thanks | 15:03 |
| lool | amitk: There you go | 15:04 |
| lool | amitk: I agree this should all be post A4 | 15:04 |
| levonshe | Hi guys, sorry to interrupt your discusssin, just simple question - Please explain why ubuntu kernel ftp site lists separate mdules, like virtio-modules-2.6.31-5-generic-di_2.6.31-5.24_i386.udeb . I thought these modules should be a product of kernel compilation? | 15:04 |
| lool | amitk: Do you agree we should just use babbage in meta as well now for a$? | 15:04 |
| lool | a$ | 15:04 |
| lool | grr | 15:04 |
| lool | a4 | 15:05 |
| * ogra doesnt care as long as he gets told the right name :) | 15:05 | |
| amitk | lool: agreed. It will be easier to rename everything if we decide to. | 15:05 |
| ogra | rtg, so call it linux-babbage for now and we'll adjust post A4 | 15:06 |
| ogra | rtg, and dont care about upgrade paths for now, its only important that we have solved that for final, A4 is only first shot | 15:07 |
| rtg | ogra, email sent | 15:12 |
| ogra | rtg, agreed for A4 ... | 15:13 |
| rtg | ogra, cool. when you want the names changed post A4 please start an LP bug so that we're all reading the same page. | 15:14 |
| ogra | yeah, good idea | 15:14 |
| ogra | lool, mind to file it since you are the driving power here ? | 15:14 |
| rtg | ogra, lool: make sure you assign it to me lest I not see it in the blizzard of bug reports. | 15:15 |
| ogra | indeed :) | 15:15 |
| lool | Sorry I'm in a call | 15:16 |
| lool | File a bug on the renaming? | 15:16 |
| lool | Sure can do | 15:16 |
| ogra | great, thanks | 15:16 |
| * ogra would do it but you have the best arguments :) | 15:16 | |
| apw | levonshe, those .udeb files are the result of kernel compilation | 15:19 |
| lool | rtg: What's the package name for meta? | 15:20 |
| ogra | levonshe, they are not used in normal systems though | 15:20 |
| lool | rtg: I mean same meta? | 15:20 |
| ogra | lool, linux-babbage says the mail | 15:20 |
| lool | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-fsl-imx51/+bug/411968 | 15:20 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 411968 in linux-fsl-imx51 "Please rename babbage to imx51, just like in jaunty" [Undecided,New] | 15:20 |
| ogra | lool, meta isnt uploaded yet | 15:20 |
| lool | ogra: I mean the source | 15:20 |
| rtg | apw, re: bug #350789. I though we fixed it? | 15:25 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 350789 in linux "AppArmor Debug: Hook being called from interrupt context" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/350789 | 15:25 |
| jjohansen | rtg: we did | 15:26 |
| apw | yeah its only on our lists cause its in an odd state | 15:26 |
| jjohansen | rtg: status is updated | 15:26 |
| apw | jjohansen, ta | 15:27 |
| apw | jjohansen, is the fix applicable to Karmic, or already applied there? | 15:27 |
| jjohansen | apw: already applied | 15:27 |
| apw | and released? | 15:27 |
| jjohansen | apw: yeah, it actually has a slightly alternate fix in it from the start | 15:28 |
| apw | so its already uploaded in karmic? then the linux(ubuntu) task should be Fix Released | 15:28 |
| jjohansen | ah okay | 15:28 |
| apw | and i don't think it can be assigned to a jaunty milestone | 15:29 |
| Q-FUNK | TheMuso: it appears that those changes in alsa-utils and pulseaudio to rely upon udev features have bombed majorly. how can we fix them? | 15:32 |
| === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks | ||
| rtg | ogra, linux-meta-fsl-imx51 uploaded. perhaps you could annoy the various mobile team archive admins in order to get this package processed through NEW ? I'm off onto the next big thing... | 16:26 |
| ogra | will do, i'll yank your chain if it fails to build though ;) | 16:26 |
| rtg | ogra, I would expect no less. | 16:27 |
| bjf | >> | 16:59 |
| bjf | >> Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Today @ 17:00 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting | 16:59 |
| bjf | >> | 16:59 |
| === pgraner changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: "Home: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ || Karmic Kernel Version: 2.6.31 || Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tuesday, 11 August - 17:00 UTC" | ||
| ogra | rtg, james_w had some complaints aout meta but left it through | 17:48 |
| ogra | <james_w> ogra: I don't think there's a need for it to explain the history of linux in debian/copyright given that it's just a metapackage | 17:48 |
| ogra | <james_w> plus, Vcs-Git is invalid | 17:48 |
| ogra | (for the next round :) ) | 17:48 |
| rtg | ogra, what's wrong with 'Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-karmic-meta.git fsl-imx51' ? | 17:49 |
| ogra | no idea, i havent complained | 17:50 |
| apw | rtg, i've got a couple of karmic updates dropping stuff from ubuntu as per discussions at sprint... is the tree up to date? | 17:50 |
| rtg | apw, nail it | 17:51 |
| rtg | apw, and while you're at it, make sure I haven't wrecked anything. there are a few packaging changes | 17:52 |
| apw | will do ... i'll be uploading it to my preview ppa so that'll be a good test | 17:53 |
| rtg | ogra, the copyright does seem a bit over the top, but then its been there since Feisty AFAIK | 17:53 |
| ogra | well, lets ask james for the actual final meta, i dont think we need to care for that one at all | 17:54 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| apw | rtg ok i've just uploaded karmic tip to my daily PPA | 18:42 |
| apw | we'll know shortly if its all spagetti | 18:43 |
| rtg | apw, well, I _did_ build it here before I pushed :) | 18:46 |
| maco | iwlagn is currently using 101% of CPU on my system. this has to be bug. have any of you run into it? | 18:50 |
| rtg | maco, seems like a lot. have you contacted anyone on the wireless mailing list? | 18:52 |
| maco | no, id thought it stopped. i dont think it was doing it with -3 but its there in -5 again | 18:53 |
| rtg | sconklin, I'll see your comment, and raise you by one. https://launchpad.net/bugs/412039 | 18:53 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 412039 in linux-backports-modules-2.6.28 "ath5k: Add LED support for Acer device" [Medium,In progress] | 18:53 |
| rtg | maco, does it still happen with Karmic LBM ? | 18:54 |
| maco | rtg: its nondeterministic. if i modprobe -r and then modprobe, itll stop | 18:55 |
| maco | "i dont think it happened on -3" means "i dont recall getting annoyed at my keystrokes not being registered in the last couple weeks...uh...." | 18:56 |
| maco | (when it pegs my cpu, and i try to type, some keystrokes just get dropped) | 18:56 |
| rtg | maco, that kind of implies an interrupt storm | 18:57 |
| maco | i can try installing lbm, but since i dont have any nice reproducible way to get it to happen... | 18:57 |
| maco | im behind a nat, so i doubt anyone's trying to DoS my laptop and actually reaching it | 18:57 |
| maco | if thats what you mean by interrupt storm....that the interface is being hammered | 18:58 |
| rtg | maco, no, I mean that the firmware might be misbehaving and generating too many interrupts. Hence, your loss of keyboard inputs | 18:58 |
| maco | ah. i was surprised to see iwlagn being a process of its own | 18:59 |
| maco | would lbm have new firmware? i didnt think it did | 18:59 |
| rtg | maco, I think iwlagn still uses their own rate selection process, so perhaps its that thread running amok | 18:59 |
| rtg | I'm checking on firmware versions 'cause I can't remember | 19:00 |
| rtg | maco, i4965 is one minor rev newer. everything else looks the same. | 19:01 |
| maco | alright, ill give it a try then | 19:01 |
| rtg | doh, i4965 is the same. I'm dislexic. | 19:02 |
| maco | oh | 19:02 |
| rtg | the biggest difference with LBM will be in the driver itself. | 19:02 |
| rtg | its worth a shot | 19:02 |
| maco | ok any suggestions on why Xorg is using 58% of CPU (now.... before iwlagn started acting up it was using 98%) when ive got compositing off? or should i ask #ubuntu-x that one? | 19:03 |
| rtg | maco, definitely an X question | 19:04 |
| maco | (yay dual core! actually makes it possible for wireless to use 100%, graphics to use 60% and my mail client to use 40%) | 19:04 |
| rtg | maco, you're kind of hell on battery life :) | 19:04 |
| maco | rtg: well none of the above SHOULD use as much cpu as they do | 19:06 |
| rtg | maco, hence my amusement. | 19:06 |
| maco | if i wanted to compile anything, id be screwed | 19:07 |
| maco | itd take a week | 19:07 |
| maco | actually, i find my cpu spins up all hot and crazy when i compile things on a remote system over ssh and dont even have that ssh screen visible (so drawing the compile output isnt the issue) | 19:08 |
| maco | rtg: maybe iwlagn goes stupid when there's lots of small amounts of data going through? | 19:08 |
| rtg | maco, it still generates plenty of network traffic (lots of small packets) | 19:09 |
| rtg | maco, try using screen on the remote, then disconnect | 19:09 |
| maco | so maybe IRC is the ame way? | 19:09 |
| maco | *same | 19:09 |
| rtg | hmm, IRC generates such a small amount of traffic. | 19:09 |
| maco | when in 35 channels? | 19:09 |
| rtg | even so, unless someone is pasting a boatload of stuff, there really isn't that much. | 19:10 |
| maco | im trying to think...maybe the combination of IRC + KMail syncing + apt = iwlagn :( | 19:10 |
| rtg | maco, possibly. I'd drop a not to the wireless folks. perhaps they've already seen something similar. | 19:11 |
| rtg | note* | 19:11 |
| maco | ok | 19:12 |
| Q-FUNK | ogasawara: seems that I got bingo on that Bug #396286 | 19:59 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 396286 in linux "2.6.31-generic: kernel panic near the end of initramfs" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/396286 | 19:59 |
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: I'm building the next test kernel, just have to give it a while to finish building | 20:00 |
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: as usual, I'll post to the bug when it's ready | 20:00 |
| Q-FUNK | ogasawara: ok. I was just curious to hear about possible causes I should watch for. | 20:01 |
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: that's what we're narrowing down | 20:01 |
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: there's 71 commits left to bisect | 20:01 |
| Q-FUNK | oh | 20:05 |
| Q-FUNK | between 999.200908071658 and 999.200908110142 you meant? | 20:06 |
| Q-FUNK | as 2.6.30.999.200908110142 crashes during boot while 2.6.30.999.200908071658 didn't | 20:08 |
| ogasawara | Q-FUNK: right, narrowing it down between those two | 20:09 |
| Kev__ | hi | 20:27 |
| Kev__ | there is a problem with the configuration of the ubuntu kernel which lets a system freeze completely | 20:28 |
| Kev__ | it concerns the configure symbol CONFIG_SATA_PMP which has some bug that will freeze some systems under heavy IO Load | 20:32 |
| mcasadevall | apw, I have a config patch for SPARC for you (it just built off the latest head as of a few hours ago) | 21:01 |
| mcasadevall | (I fear if I send it to the list, I'll hit the moderation queue again) | 21:01 |
| Noble | Hi, I've got a MSI notebook with UNR installed. Some kid told me that using the 2.6.30 kernel would improve speed. How do I go about installing it? | 21:40 |
| Kev__ | speed of what? | 22:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!