/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/12/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asac__fta is completely gone now :/00:01
BUGabundoheeh00:01
BUGabundoits just a but00:01
BUGabundobit00:01
BUGabundoreboot00:01
BUGabundohe will be back00:02
BUGabundoasac 3g work after reboot only. standby or hibernate stops from finding the dongle00:02
asac__BUGabundo: good. i also had odd issues here with backtraces in kernel00:03
asac__BUGabundo: can you try .30 kernel again?00:03
BUGabundonope00:03
BUGabundodon't have any00:03
BUGabundoall .3100:03
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asac__BUGabundo: you should always keep at least one of each series00:06
BUGabundowhy???00:06
BUGabundothis is a clean install00:06
asac__you could grab one from the kernel ppa thing00:06
BUGabundo1 month agio00:06
BUGabundodid not bring any older kernel00:07
asac__sure. but if you have the chance keep the old versions to track regressions00:07
BUGabundotoo lazy00:07
BUGabundoyou know that00:07
asac__didnt know you installed new00:07
asac__i never reinstall ;)00:07
BUGabundoI keep 4 kernel00:07
BUGabundomore then I want00:07
BUGabundoonly two work00:07
BUGabundo1st time too00:07
BUGabundolasted 4 devel cycles00:07
BUGabundotoo small /00:07
asac__ok good00:07
BUGabundoonly 10GiB00:07
BUGabundoalways above 90%00:07
asac__http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/00:08
BUGabundoso I set a new SINGLE partition00:08
BUGabundonow trying swap on file00:08
BUGabundonot ready for prime time00:08
BUGabundoI know the PPA00:08
asac__hmm either .31 isnt out or they dont maintain those anymore00:08
asac__yeah seems rc5 is the latest upstream00:08
asac__ok00:08
asac__you could also try the latest .31 kernel from there. the issues i saw looked really to basic to be broken in vanilla kernel ;)00:09
BUGabundoI can't00:10
BUGabundothose are JAUNTY sauce builds00:10
BUGabundonot karmic00:11
BUGabundothey will break stuff like audio and maube X00:11
crimsunhuh?00:12
BUGabundocrimsun: isn't that right?00:13
BUGabundothat was what I was told00:13
* micahg has .30 kernel00:13
BUGabundothat the kernel ppa builds are for jaunty not karmic00:14
* micahg is running Jaunty :)00:14
BUGabundowe know!00:15
BUGabundoyou keep saying00:15
BUGabundoso your X is now ok ???00:15
crimsunBUGabundo: i don't know what you mean by "for jaunty" - they run fine on karmic00:15
BUGabundoguess we need a fork ubuntu running on rolling base distro LOL00:15
crimsunthere's nothing in the base chain that requires you run those cod kernels on jaunty00:15
crimsunjaunty's udev is new enough00:16
BUGabundothat's what I was told on +1 I thinkg00:16
BUGabundonot only me, several other terstes00:16
BUGabundoneed to track down the guilty part and wack him with a wet toutgh00:16
BUGabundohey fta00:16
BUGabundothat was hard!!! bad disk ?LOLOL00:16
BUGabundotime to hit the sack01:01
rleedsI just got the update which made firefox-3.5 default01:39
rleedsI selected Keep 3.5 settings, but my addons are all gone01:40
rleedsso I switched profiles.ini to point to (what I think) is my old profile...and still no luck01:40
rleedsany ideas?01:40
rleedsmicahg, found it. thanks01:51
micahgping asac10:28
micahgasac: I have to go to sleep, but when you return to the channel, could you please look at bug 407180 -- I commented, but wasn't sure about the workaround the user mentioned.10:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 407180 in firefox-3.5 "Firefox 3.5 needs language packs" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40718010:33
dupondjeand checkout  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/41241810:35
dupondje:)10:35
ubottuLaunchpad bug 412418 in firefox-3.0 "Broken website" [Undecided,New]10:35
micahgdupondje: could you please file a crash report10:39
dupondjehow ? :)10:41
micahgdupondje: do you have apport enabled?10:43
micahgdupondje: It doesn't crash for me10:45
micahgbut I'm not running karmic10:45
dupondje32bit ?10:45
micahgnope, 6410:45
micahgdo you have apport enabled?10:45
dupondjeye10:45
micahgok10:45
micahgdoes it pop up if you generate the crash?10:46
dupondjeit did :p no more now :p10:46
micahgso it's not longer crashing?10:47
dupondjeit crashes, just no apport ...10:47
micahgah10:47
micahgcan you start firefox like so:10:48
micahgstrace -eopen firefox-3.5 2&>1 | tee /tmp/strace_ff35.log10:48
micahgand then attach that file to the bug after you generate the crash10:48
dupondjeremoved all files from /var/crach10:49
dupondjecrash :p10:49
dupondjeand now apport is back10:49
micahgah10:49
dupondje14mb big :p10:51
micahgwhich one?10:51
micahgthe log file10:51
micahgyou can gzip first10:51
micahgdupondje: I have to go to sleep10:56
micahgI'll take a look tomorrow night10:56
dupondjeok10:56
dupondje:)10:56
micahgso, if you can attach the strace and/or submit a crash report and note the number in that bug that would be helpful10:57
micahgthanks asac11:01
asacnp11:02
micahgasac: is Ubuntu Translations the place to report language problems?  You mentioned langpack-omatic?11:03
dpmmicahg: hi, regarding your question, yes, it is worth opening a bug task for ubuntu-translations as well for language problems. You can ping me as well if you like, but asac will be more knowledgeable on the technical bits.11:06
micahgdpm: should bug 410060 be in Ubuntu translations instead of lanpack-o-matic?11:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 410060 in firefox-3.0 "wrong translation dutch endless loop page" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41006011:07
* dpm is reading11:11
dpmmicahg: I think it is a simple translation (l10n) bug, which probably comes from upstream. As such, it doesn't have anything to do with langpack-o-matic, which is the program used to export translations from Launchpad and create language packs. It might be worth adding ubuntu-translations as a task, but I believe the langpack-o-matic task should be cloased as Invalid. asac: is the Dutch team whitelisted for ff3.0? If it is, this bug could be fixe11:13
dpmd in Rosetta and released through the next language pack releases11:13
micahgI moved the project task to Ubuntu Translations11:15
dpmthanks11:17
* micahg is off to bed11:17
asacmicahg: night11:27
asacmicahg: dpm: the technical bits is often langpack-o-matic too11:28
asacin this case that would probably hve been the better target ... but i wanted to look at enabling ffox 3.5 and copying existing translations this week11:28
dpmasac: we were talking about another bug^ (bug 410060), which had nothing to do with langpack-o-matic. But back to the question: is the Dutch team whitelisted for ff3.0? If it is, this bug could be fixed in Rosetta and released through the next language pack releases11:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 410060 in firefox-3.0 "wrong translation dutch endless loop page" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41006011:33
asacdpm:  cat mozilla-rosetta/po2xpi/data/9.10/whitelist.txt11:36
asacast11:36
asacfi11:36
asacoc11:36
asacthose are the three currently whitelisted11:36
dpmah, thanks11:36
asacbut we will enable all any day ;)11:36
asacfor karmic11:36
asacbut that doesnt help here11:36
asacdoes the problem also happen when user installs upstream .xpi?11:36
asachttp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0.13/linux-i686/xpi/11:37
asacthere are the .xpis11:37
asaccommented11:38
dpmasac: well, if the language is not whitelisted, only the upstream translations are used. After looking at the upstream nl.xpi files, I see that the error comes from there (netError.dtd).11:42
asacdpm: ok its still in there, then we should forward the bug properly for now11:45
dpmasac: I'll contact the Dutch translation team and let them forward this to upstream (actually, forwarding I could probably do myself). Also, they should judge whether the translation fix is important enough to justify an update. If they say yes, I think the easiest thing to do would be for them to fix this in LP and export the translation into the next Jaunty language pack update11:56
dupondjehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/412418 <- asac, check last comment, kinda weird ...12:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 412418 in firefox-3.5 "Broken website" [Undecided,Confirmed]12:04
asacdupondje: can you reproduce?12:07
dupondjeyep12:08
dupondjealways12:08
asacdupondje: -safe-mode too?12:08
asacDownThemAll! (version: 1.1.4)12:08
asacSmoothWheel (AMO) (version: 0.44.18.20090408.3)12:08
asac Ad blocker (version: 0.6.5) -12:08
asacok i can see this too12:09
asacplease check this with upstream builds and if it happens too forward and give me bug id12:09
sveinungHello13:52
sveinungThank you for uploading mozilla-devscripts to debian and implementing substvars in it13:52
bdrung_sveinung: yw. feel free to report any issue with it.13:57
statikhi asac, just nagging about bindwood package - did you get a chance to look at uploading since last thursday?13:57
bdrung_sveinung: or any improvement13:57
sveinungI was wondering if you would mind me trying to get all-in-one-sidebar uploaded to Debian. A nice way to test if some improvement is needed. If you already have plans to do it yourself I can help if you want me to.13:59
sveinung(aios uses mozilla-devscripts)13:59
bdrung_what is aios?14:00
sveinungall_in_one_sidebar14:00
sveinungfirefox extension14:00
sveinungI did the previous two updates of all-in-one-sidebar in Ubuntu (the bzr branch for the last update is not merged yet but the package is in the Ubuntu archive) so I think I won't break it ;)14:01
bdrung_sveinung: i do not know this extension.14:01
sveinungit gives you a sidebar in Firefox14:01
sveinunghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/all-in-one-sidebar14:02
bdrung_sveinung: you should search, if there is a wnpp report for it. if not you can file one14:04
bdrung_sveinung: with -devscripts in debian it makes packaging easy14:04
sveinungI know :)14:05
sveinungjust wanted to know if you would mind it14:05
sveinung(for examle if you had plans to upolad it)14:05
sveinung(since it already is in Ubuntu)14:05
bdrung_sveinung: you should probably ask sebner (initial packager)14:06
bdrung_sveinung: or asac14:06
sveinungok14:06
bdrung_sveinung: otherwise go ahead :)14:06
asacwe have all-in-one-sidebar in archive14:20
bdrung_asac: that was not the question14:22
sveinungasac: i wondered if you were OK with me trying to get it into Debian (or if you had plans to do it yourself)14:25
sveinung(or was opposed to it for other reasons)14:26
bdrung_sebner: do you have plans to bring all-in-one-sidebar to Debian or would you like to see sveinung to do this?14:32
* asac_ is exhausted from the knetworkmanager triaging14:52
bdrung_asac: then come back to gnome :)15:06
asacbdrung_: i _am_ on gnome15:29
asacand it took me half of the night to finally get things so that i could debug the real issue15:29
asacjust because kde folks didnt add all dependencies that were needed ;)15:30
bdrung_asac: that's bad.15:30
asacwell. now i learned it the hard way15:31
asacso at least i can look into knetworkmanager things ;)15:31
asacpreviously i just refused with "thats far too dirty for me to touch" ;)15:31
bdrung_that was probably simpler :)15:32
asachad to triage the low level libs to find out that i missed a package ,)15:32
asacyeah15:32
asacbut every cycle knetworkmanager was broken15:32
asacthat breaks my heart15:32
bdrung_thats not good15:33
=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung
sveinungbdrung: tanks for your post to pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org. It was better formulated than what I was about to post in my clumsy English.16:51
sveinungHowever it seems like it didn't get through to the list. At least I can't find it in the mail archives yet. (http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2009-August/000109.html) Are you registered? If not: do you want me to forward it for you?16:51
bdrungsveinung: yw. my english is probably not even better. :)16:52
sveinungbdrung: yw? (Sorry, I'm not used to IRC)16:53
bdrungsveinung: i am registered there, but i used my gmail address instead of the ubuntu one for sending the mail. the mail is waiting to be moderated16:53
sveinungok16:53
bdrungsveinung: you're welcome16:54
bdrung:)16:54
bdrungsveinung: you can use the "wtf" program for such abbreviations :)16:54
sveinungtanks16:55
sveinung*thanks16:55
bdrungnice typo :)16:55
asacbdrung: is that a new thread?17:00
bdrungasac: new thread?17:01
bdrungwhat?17:01
* bdrung is confused.17:01
asacabout the CDBS thing17:08
asaci am replying too17:08
asacnoit sure what you wrote ;)17:08
bdrungasac: i wrote something similar. i setup now my ubuntu email address and can resend it via it.17:14
asacbdrung: are you subscribed? i think i was whitelisted at some point17:17
asacor someone subscribed me to it17:17
bdrungasac: my ubuntu address is subscribed, but not the gmail address.17:18
asacah17:18
bdrungasac: i finally setup evolution (after having the ubuntu address for month)17:19
asacdoppelt haelt besser ;)17:19
bdrung:)17:19
bdrungasac: or: zu viele köche verderben den brei17:19
asacbdrung: dont be pessimistic ;)17:24
bdrungasac: i am an optimist with experience :p17:24
asacas long as we dont disagree its fine i think ;)17:25
bdrungasac: there are only 10 types of persons: the optimists and the optimists with experience.17:25
micahgasac: do we suggest installing upstream language xpis until we produce our own?17:26
asacbdrung: so one thing for 0.15 i almost forgot was "better debhelper" support ;)17:27
asacmicahg: we suggest to use english17:27
asacwe are not even at alpha417:27
asacits important to have translations17:27
bdrungasac: better debhelper support?17:27
asacbut not that important for folks that probably rely on being able to get support from international communities17:27
micahgok, user was talking about jaunty more than karmic with regard to translations17:27
asacat least thats my idea on it ;)17:28
asacmicahg: which languages are missing?17:28
asacwe have almost all17:28
micahgff3.517:28
asacmaybe 2 or 3 were added17:28
asacmicahg: if they really need it they can use xpis17:28
asacbut we dont encourage them17:28
asacat least i wouldnt to because those extensions will hide the system once forever17:29
micahgwell, user was wondering why we don't post he workaround to get the upstream xpis in the master bug17:29
asacmicahg: tell them to remember and write down a few times to uninstall them when they upgrade to karmic17:29
asac;)17:29
micahgand I response idk, I but i'll find out17:29
asacmicahg: because of the reason i mentioned17:29
asaceven if we tell folks to remember to uninstall them17:29
asacthey will surely not remember17:29
micahgright17:30
asacas they wont see a problem until they upgrade to 3.617:30
micahglike flash 9 :)17:30
asacthen they dont have translations and then cause maintenance problems17:30
asacbest way would be to provide lang packs somewhere in ppa or so17:30
asacbut i am not sure about that17:30
micahgso, I should just reply we don't recommend using upstream xpis at this time?17:30
asacmicahg: yes. point them that there is the option and tell them about the risk and to remember blah blah blah ...17:32
micahgok :)17:32
asacthey will find the instructions somewhere anyway17:32
asacso better put it there with the background17:32
asacmaybe some folks will remember when this happens and can help instead of putting load on us17:33
micahgasac: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/252025/17:36
bdrungasac: what do you mean with "better debhelper support"?17:36
bdrungasac: what needs to be done?17:37
asacbdrung: a easy way (or maybe just instructions) on how to hook it up17:46
asacexample if all is fine17:46
asacnot sure though ;)17:46
asacmaybe also integrating in debhelper v7 ... which does more on its own afaik17:46
asacbut i am out of sync there ;)17:47
bdrungasac: does debhelper v7 support "plugins"?17:47
asacENOCLUE ;)17:49
asacbut we have a few weeks before we need to get 0.15 out i hope17:49
bdrungasac: do you know some debhelper hacker hanging out on irc?17:50
bdrungasac: you probably mean -ENOCLUE :)17:50
asaci dont even know who is a debhelper hacker17:51
asaclets check manpages17:51
asacjoey hess17:51
asacno clue if he is in #debian-deve on oftc17:51
micahgI'm assuming bug 375205 is an upstream issue?17:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 375205 in firefox-3.0 "resizing "Organize Bookmarks" window returns you to the top of the bookmark list" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/37520517:51
asacmost likely17:52
asaci think its safe to foward. but check for existing bugs ;)17:52
micahgok, will do later tonight17:52
micahgI opened an upstream task in the mean time17:52
asacok i am dropping out. worked almost all night. need to get away from system17:53
asactalk to you tomorrow!17:54
micahgok, bye asac17:54
bdrungasac: bye17:54
asacthx17:54
sebnerbdrung: please take it. It was just one try to package a mozilla extension and to make asac happy =) thx for asking18:46
bdrungsebner: sveinung wants to bring it to Debian.18:47
bdrungsveinung: ^18:47
sebnerbdrung: I know, just read his mail18:47
bdrungsebner: ah, ok18:47
sveinunggood18:48
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
ftaPPA exceeded its size limit (42629.00 of 40600.00 MiB).19:44
bdrungfta: over 40 gig for what?19:46
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa19:47
ftabut it's volatile19:47
ftai can't push 2 releases in 24h19:47
bdrungfta: maybe chromium should provide a data package.20:25
ftabdrung, it will do no good. the only indep files are the lang packs (i already have the -l10n deb) and inspector20:43
ftahttp://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1812120:44
bdrungfta: but why is the binary package 17 mib big?20:48
fta-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 29177904 2009-08-11 19:46 chromium-browser20:48
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10119816 2009-08-11 19:46 libnpapi_test_plugin.so20:49
ftathis one i should probably drop20:49
bdrungcompared to20:51
bdrung-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  93048 2009-08-05 11:45 firefox-3.520:51
bdrungfta: one more reason not to try chromium20:51
ftacompare with libxul and all the other libs20:51
ftachromium is statically built, not firefox/xul20:51
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16346616 2009-08-11 18:28 /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2a2pre/libxul.so20:52
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1375792 2009-08-11 18:28 /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2a2pre/libmozjs.so20:52
bdrungfta: ok, then the diff is not that big20:54
ftaand i'm working on making chromium use more system libs, so it will shrink a bit20:55
ftabut not much i'm afraid20:55
ftait's not the reason why the ppa is so big20:57
fta chromium-testsuite-dbg_4.0.202.0~svn20090812r23134-0ubuntu1~ucd1_amd64.deb  (799.9 MiB)20:57
ftathis is why20:57
fta4x3x800MB20:57
fta#  chromium-testsuite_4.0.202.0~svn20090812r23134-0ubuntu1~ucd1_amd64.deb  (209.3 MiB)20:58
fta+4x3*210MB20:58
fta#  chromium-browser-dbg_4.0.202.0~svn20090812r23134-0ubuntu1~ucd1_amd64.deb  (116.3 MiB)20:58
fta+4x3*116MB20:58
bdrungwow, the testsuites are really big20:59
ftaside effect of static builds20:59
ftaasac, i should probably stop the songbird PPA, it's been broken for a while (no time to fix it), no one noticed (or at least no one complained or offered a fix), and worse, i'm not even using it21:08
BUGabundooias21:13
Mook_sbfta: ah; didn't realize the ppa died; looks like a patch failed to apply, though, so it doesn't seem to be anything I can do.21:58
ftaMook_sb, well, it's my burden to fix those stuff usually, but i'm spending my time on something else. i just can't do it all by myself anymore22:01
Mook_sbfta: yeah; it's all right, I was just randomly poking in to see if I could help22:01
Mook_sbno pressure on you to fix anything :)22:01
asacfta: i will send out a call for help23:10
asacthere were more than one asking how to help on ppas ;)23:11
asacnow its their chance23:11
ftaTHUNDERBIRD_2_0_0_23_BUILD123:53
BUGabundofta: a tiny bit too fast23:55
BUGabundoasac only came *after*23:55
ftaTHUNDERBIRD_2_0_0_23_BUILD123:55
* BUGabundo hears an echo23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!