=== mrooney|w1 is now known as mrooney|w === mac__v is now known as mac_v [05:36] kenvandine: is empathy in karmic going to have adium support? or geoclue? or libchamplain? [05:37] adium theme that is [09:53] mrooney|w: hi... synaptic is either way going to be replaced in Karmic+1 , IMO , there is no need for a papercut [09:53] we caould just let the task in synaptic remain and be fixed in synaptic [09:54] could* === ScottK2 is now known as ScottK [13:40] * MacSlow -> lunch === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow [14:27] djsiegel: i think you misread my comment yesterday [14:27] mac_v: which one? [14:27] I bet I did :) === smerp_ is now known as smerp][ [14:29] djsiegel: my reply was not about share / instal but rather a reply to "shouldn't the response be from the perspective of the respondent?" === smerp][ is now known as smerp [14:29] yes [14:30] djsiegel: just dont be too hasty in saying someone is bikeshedding :/ [14:31] mac_v, the bug is fixing the unknown antecedent of "them" [14:31] and your comment was that "share the disk" and "use the entire disk" are not phrased from the same perspective? [14:31] djsiegel: yeah that was fine but adding the "I" , was not [14:32] ok, I see [14:32] What do you propose instead? [14:32] Does it make a difference to users? [14:33] Is it harder to use, or less beautiful right now? [14:33] If it communicates the choice (users can understand it without difficulty), it is bikeshedding unless there's an alternative that you can provide that is unambiguously better [14:33] so do it! :) [14:33] djsiegel: installers , do not use "I" , but since it is an installer , it will be in almost all the guides , and will be quickly pointed out [14:34] Installers do not use "I"? [14:34] Installer starts with "I"! [14:34] maybe Ubuntu's installer should be all about "I" [14:35] thats what i said , if you want all as response , "I" then the 3 need to be changed [14:35] So, you think the options should not be from the perspective of the user? [14:35] I havent seen an installer , which has options like that [14:36] djsiegel: i think rather than , patching it up , Evan canfix it properly [14:36] mac_v, that's fine, but what is your proposal [14:36] "show me the code" [14:36] ah... just a sec [14:36] stop arguing these fine details, and just give the improved suggestion [14:37] I understand your hesitancy to use "I", but it's possible that using "I" makes the software friendly, easy to use and understand [14:37] there is no inviolable law of nature set against the use of "I" in software installers [14:37] djsiegel: Share the disk with existing installations [ allows choosing between them when You start the computer] [14:38] ok, so, you've added a parenthetical voice [14:38] I argue that it's now harder to read [14:38] ok i give up [14:38] "share" is imperative [14:38] the user is telling the installer to share [14:38] then it shifts in voice back to the installer [14:39] djsiegel: the words within brackets are explanations , similar to the [advanced] [14:39] but I do think it's more grammatically correct than my suggestion [14:39] 3rd option [14:39] Share the disk with existing installations, choosing between them when I start the computer [14:39] "choosing" seems the wrong tense [14:40] Share the disk with existing installations; allow me to choose between them when I start the computer [14:40] two commands [14:41] but the semi-colon is recondite [14:41] Share the disk with existing installations and allow me to choose between them when I start the computer [14:41] hmm [14:41] yes that's good [14:41] we're getting longer and longer though [14:41] Sorry, I actually haven't a clue what this is about. [14:42] hehe [14:42] np, good suggestion kholerabbi [14:42] hmm, I'd prefer a comma [14:42] Share the disk with existing installations, allow me to choose between them when I start the computer [14:42] mac_v, better? ^ [14:43] djsiegel: better , [14:43] "share the disk", "allow me to choose", "use the entire disk" [14:43] "specify partitions manually..." is the odd one out [14:44] wtf is empathy telling me "doesn't" is bad spelling O.o [14:46] djsiegel: "Let me specify manually" [14:47] hmm, we're supposed to avoid "letting" the user take action [14:47] it makes the user feel like the computer is in control instead of vice versa [14:47] hmmm.. [14:48] "custom design" [14:48] djsiegel: "Choose advanced options" [14:48] too vague [14:48] "Use special partitioning (advanced)" [14:49] 'advanced' should be avoided [14:51] kholerabbi: advanced needs to be mentioned so that novice users dont mess up [14:52] djsiegel: i think it sounds good , or "Use advanced partitioning" [14:53] "Use advanced partitioning... [14:53] and no need for "(advanced)" [14:53] great! want to update the bug? [14:54] post a new comment with just the suggestions and a small comment, let the "mockup" argue itself [14:58] "Share the disk with existing installations, allow me to choose between them when I start the computer"... I'm tired, so might be nit-picking, but "allowing" sounds more correct than "allow". [15:07] djsiegel: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/400047/comments/14 [15:07] Launchpad bug 400047 in hundredpapercuts "Installer's "Install them side by side" option is vague and confusing" [Undecided,Confirmed] [15:41] Hello [15:41] is it possible for an app using notify-OSD to disable "truncation" capability from notification daemon ? [15:42] if not, how can I know the maximum length of text before it gets truncated ? [15:45] AnAnt: apps cant override the truncation , i think the limit is in the wiki > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NotifyOSD , if not, ask MacSlow [15:45] correct, apps cannot override that [15:46] AnAnt, the reason is to avoid spam [15:46] notification-spam [15:46] I see [15:50] thanks [15:50] so, is messaging menu only for messaging (IM / email ...) apps ? [15:53] back to the first question, the wiki says that maximum text length is 10 lines [15:54] now, how long is a single line? [15:55] hmm regarding that messaging menu, it appears to be using some strange font hinting that results in the text having a shade of purple [16:08] hyperair: lol ... bug # ? [16:08] didn't file one [16:08] * hyperair is lazy [16:09] you can go file it for me =D [16:09] hyperair: hehe... WFM , so i cant complain ;p [16:09] is there a wiki for messaging menu ? [16:10] AnAnt: search the wiki , there is a page [16:14] mpt: about the nautilus spatial mode , are you fixing it or ... ? [16:15] spatial mode? [16:16] is that the strange mode that opens a new window with every folder? [16:16] yeah === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|capoeira [17:06] mac_v, no, I haven't done anything about that [17:07] mpt: ah... should i file a bug? [17:07] upstream that is [17:08] mac_v, sure [17:08] mpt: any other alternate name for spatial mode? [17:08] i'll add that to the bug === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [17:09] mac_v, as I suggested yesterday, I think the "Open" item should always be there to open in a spatial-mode window, and the "Browse" item always there to open in a browser-mode window [17:10] so, no need for a special term [17:10] ok [18:49] mac_v: yeah that sounds reasonable [18:51] mrooney|w: i usually invalidate any synaptic bugs , letting mvo deal with it at his leisure ;) === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [19:18] mac_v: did you see those 20 papercuts all filed by the same person last night, with the entire bug in the description [19:18] looks like fun! [19:19] yeah... i have them all bookmarked , to be invalidated ;p most are just new idea! [19:19] ideas* [19:20] mrooney|w: you should have seen papercuts initaily , every person would file 10 bugs , all new ideas! once they know wht it is actually they stop [19:21] yeah [19:21] I wish it was clearer that papercuts are just a task and that the bug also needs be placed in the right package [19:22] mrooney|w: pls , invalidate them , i just got tied up with , with a few crashes in my sys. , [19:22] mrooney|w: this should make things easier > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Invalid%20One%20Hundred%20Paper%20Cuts [19:22] I am at work ATM so I may not get to them :) [19:23] mrooney|w: np ... ok... ;) , i'll get to it later