[00:23]  * maxb pretty much rewrites dev.lp.net/Running/RemoteAccess entirely
[00:27] <wgrant> maxb: A good idea.
[00:28] <maxb> It was a bit horrid
[00:34] <wgrant> maxb: Ah, much better.
[22:01] <thumper> morning
[22:03] <maxb> evening! :-)
[22:16] <thumper> spm: ping
[22:31] <spm> thumper: heyo
[22:31] <thumper> spm: morning
[22:31] <thumper> spm: what's up with staging?
[22:32] <spm> that'll learn me to not check the 'red' tabs sooner - assumed it was a weekend ping and could wait a bit... :-)
[22:32] <spm> thumper: looks dead. poss, staging restore boomsville
[22:32] <thumper> :)
[22:47] <spm> thumper: yah. looks like the shutdown/restore part went a tad haywire. looks good now.
[22:47] <thumper> spm: ok, when is the next code update?
[22:47] <thumper> spm: I landed some stuff in the weekend
[22:47] <thumper> that I wanted to check
[22:47] <thumper> but I need r8385 :)
[22:48] <thumper> just one more than there is there now
[23:12] <spm> thumper: the latest was about 20ish hours ago; but part of is still running.
[23:14] <lifeless> timeouts on lp-code?
[23:14] <lifeless> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/bzr
[23:22] <thumper> lifeless: there is a fix coming
[23:22] <thumper> lifeless: it has landed
[23:22] <thumper> I could request a CP I guess
[23:22] <thumper> lifeless: some of these are due to the rapid growth of new (package) branches
[23:22] <lifeless> scaling is hard ;)
[23:22] <thumper> it is
[23:22] <lifeless> eat more
[23:22] <lifeless> scale sideways
[23:23] <lifeless> it works
[23:23] <thumper> heh
[23:23] <thumper> we are
[23:23] <thumper> with the db
[23:23] <wgrant> How many DB servers with 128GiB of RAM are there now? Three?
[23:23] <thumper> not sure
[23:23] <thumper> but they are chunky servers
[23:24] <wgrant> Yet LP remains slothful :(
[23:27] <thumper> wgrant: ORMs suck
[23:28] <thumper> wgrant: I know that is where much of our problems come from
[23:28] <thumper> I've been on a query optimisation drive
[23:28] <wgrant> thumper: Indeed.
[23:28] <wgrant> It would be nice to have a large sample data set to see where things go wrong. But I guess you guys have (soft) timeouts for that.
[23:29] <lifeless> wgrant: file a bug
[23:29] <lifeless> seriously, there is no reason we can't look at some programmatic transformation of real data to make a <large> test set, such things have been done internally before
[23:30] <thumper> lifeless, wgrant: that has been on someones TODO list since I started almost three years ago
[23:30] <beuno> hi thumper
[23:30] <lifeless> thumper: now we have volunteers!
[23:30] <thumper> hi beuno
[23:30] <thumper> beuno: I have comments about the new design
[23:31] <beuno> thumper, fantastic
[23:31] <thumper> beuno: and questions
[23:31] <beuno> thumper, great, I wanted to kick off a discussion mostly
[23:33] <thumper> beuno: yeah
[23:33] <thumper> beuno: I've been doing a lot of conversion stuff
[23:33] <thumper> beuno: mostly the listing and editing pages right now
[23:33] <thumper> beuno: I have a branch to change active reviews
[23:33] <thumper> beuno: to include the approved merges
[23:34] <beuno> ah, great
[23:34] <thumper> beuno: I also want to talk to you about the review stuff
[23:34] <thumper> beuno: and ideas I've got
[23:34] <thumper> beuno: but I seriously feel I don't have enough time to spread myself around
[23:35] <beuno> thumper, yeah, everyone in your team thought "UI cycle" meant "vacation cycle"   :)
[23:35] <thumper> beuno: yeah
[23:35] <thumper> beuno: I've been doing the code ones, and Paul has been doing answers
[23:36] <beuno> thumper, any ideas what's holding up the landing of answers?
[23:36] <beuno> I see you've been doing quite well with code
[23:36] <thumper> beuno: no, I'll be checking in with rockstar tomorrow morning my time, and we'll get some traction
[23:37] <beuno> great
[23:41] <thumper> beuno: I know he has done a lot of work on it, and just needs some nudging to get bits landed