/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/16/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

penguin42so my old .mozilla/firefox should have become .mozilla/firefox.3.0-replaces and .mozilla/firefox-3.5 would become .mozilla/firefox - so seems sane00:04
asac_penguin42: yes.00:04
asac_penguin42: question is: does your old firefox 3.0 profile look like hte one you have now?00:04
BUGabundoI just don't see my 3.5 old profile in there :(00:04
asac_penguin42: also did you have firefox 3.0 still running when you did this migration?00:04
asac_penguin42: that might be interesting and we should put a safety net in the script i think00:05
BUGabundonor I remember seeing the question when I test-run the migration before it hit the archive00:05
penguin42asac_: Good question; I think I had firefox-3.5 running when this migration happened possibly?00:05
asac_BUGabundo: it was in ppa for 1 or 2 days before going to archive00:05
asac_penguin42: hmm. that shouldnt be that bad i think00:05
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asacin any case it shouldnt migrate if anything is still running00:06
asacrather pop up a dialog saying: "stop all firefox instances first"00:06
penguin42asac: ? What in that script detect sthat?00:06
asacbut we did the same for firefox 2->3 migration00:06
asacand had almost no complains00:06
asacpenguin42: it doesnt do that atm00:06
asacwe would have to do something new for that00:06
penguin42ah right - I didn't think I could see anything....00:07
penguin42asac: The thing is the state I was in after migration was no old bookmarks, no browser history or any other data00:07
penguin42asac: IMHO that script needs to create a log of what it did, when and also needs error checking on it's shell commands00:10
* penguin42 finds his firefox.3.0-replaced has a firefox subdirectory00:13
penguin42I think that script has tried to do the move twice00:16
penguin42asac: OK, try this scenario - I don't know if it's what happened or not; I click a link that runs /usr/bin/firefox and then click it again before I notice the dialog; both instances bring up dialogs, and I answer 'keep 3.5 settings' to one, then I see the 2nd dialog and I think 'shrug, it didn't do it - ok, same again' and click 'keep 3.5 settings'00:18
penguin42ahha!00:20
penguin42yes00:20
penguin42BUGabundo: Can you look inside your firefox.3.0-replaced and see if you have a firefox dir?00:22
BUGabundolooking00:23
BUGabundodon't think so00:23
BUGabundoonly looks like old 3.0 profiles00:23
penguin42ok00:24
* penguin42 updates the bug00:27
penguin42asac: See comment in the bug00:34
penguin42in other fun and excitement - since the last few weeks I've been getting flash related crashes - commonly if I kill nspluginwrapper firefox seems to go with it - I'd never seen that before ~3 weeks ago00:42
penguin42hohum01:19
rigoAnyone: when will firefox 3.5 be available for jaunty?03:00
micahgrigo, just install firefox-3.503:03
micahgit's been there since release03:03
rigomicahg: I'm refering to canonical's official version03:04
micahgugh, it may or may not be03:05
micahgrigo: It's the same browser03:05
rigomicahg: k thanks03:10
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
BUGabundogood morning11:07
BUGabundoMozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2a2pre) Gecko/20090815 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Namoroka/3.6a2pre ID:2009081500302411:46
BUGabundohumm Namoroka kewl11:46
micahgBUGabundo: I told you Friday that 3.6 is no longer trunk11:49
BUGabundodid u»11:50
BUGabundodon't recall it11:50
BUGabundoglad I run trunk ppa then :)11:50
micahgyep, 3.7 is ther11:51
micahg*there11:51
micahgI guess it's time to upgrade :)11:51
* BUGabundo looks11:51
BUGabundo                                         firefox-3.7 - 3.7~a1~hg20090815r31585+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd111:51
BUGabundoalpha 1?11:51
micahgit's trunk11:52
BUGabundo3.6 just got pre alpha 211:52
BUGabundoolol11:52
micahgtrunk stays alpha until right before it branches AFAIK11:52
BUGabundoso I just need firefox-3.7-gnome-support ?11:52
BUGabundoit should pull everything else right?11:52
micahgIf you're using gvfs yes11:52
micahgyes11:52
BUGabundook11:53
BUGabundo  firefox-3.7{a} firefox-3.7-branding{a} firefox-3.7-gnome-support xulrunner-1.9.3{a} xulrunner-1.9.3-gnome-support{a}11:53
BUGabundothere goes ALL my addons again :)11:53
micahgooh, didn't know where was xulrunner gnome support11:53
micahgBUGabundo: you have the override extension though11:53
micahgif it doesn't break ;)11:54
BUGabundowell I'll force them to work.11:55
BUGabundobut not to work WELL11:55
BUGabundoseveral addons are broken on 3.611:55
BUGabundolike greasemonkey11:55
BUGabundotabmixplus11:55
BUGabundoupdir11:55
BUGabundonosquint11:55
BUGabundostuff I use *daily*11:55
BUGabundobbl11:56
mac_vwow , micahg sleeps only for 4 hrs ! 0.o12:22
mac_vor even less!12:22
micahgmac_v: never made it to sleep yet :)12:22
micahgwill go to sleep in about 1.5 hours12:22
micahgit's morning already12:22
micahgbut whatever12:22
micahgdid that package work for you?12:22
mac_vyeah... now i have to reconfigure all the settings12:23
mac_vmicahg: this there a bug about firefox and the cursor not being in the right spot?12:24
mac_vimena the cursor in firefox!12:24
mac_vi mean*12:24
micahgyou mean seeing a cursor in the text vs a field?12:24
mac_vwhen i select & drag text , the cursor shows up at a level higher[3-4 lines] that the pointer12:25
mac_valso the cursor lags , when i move it using pointers , could it have something to do with me always having firefox ON?12:26
mac_vbut this is a new problem , only after recent updates , and the problem starts even when i start firefox fresh12:26
micahgI remember just seeing something about that first problem12:29
micahgbug 41395012:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Drag in drop in "Organize Bookmarks" is misaligned." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41395012:30
mac_vhm... i think it has nothing to do with the bookmarks but just with the cursor positioning...12:32
micahgagreed, which leads me to believe it's not even a firefox problem12:32
micahgmaybe check on +1 for cursor odditties12:33
mac_vmicahg: i thought so too , but the cursor drag works well in other apps , i'm now writing a comment on how to test it. its a problem only in firefox. this has been there for several days, maybe even since alpha3 , i was just too lazy to report it!12:37
mac_vmicahg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/413950/comments/212:46
ubottuUbuntu bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Drag in drop in "Organize Bookmarks" is misaligned." [Undecided,Confirmed]12:46
mac_vstupid typos! not I... It*12:46
micahgmac_v: idk about that12:47
mac_vmicahg: hmm... np... I'll ask asac ... should i change the title? and edit the description ?12:48
micahgit makes sense for the cursor to be where the text would be inserted, line 112:48
mac_vwhat??? i'm confused?  the cursor is always located 3 lines higher than the pointer12:49
micahgdoesn't matter, cursor should be next to the first letter that will be inserted12:50
mac_vyeah , exactly, something is wrong in firefox12:50
micahgno, I think the FF behavior is fine12:51
micahgif you're hanging a picture, do you want it to settle based on the top, or where your ahnds are?12:51
mac_vmicahg: try the same select and drag in text editor , note the pointer is always close to the pointer , this was the behavior , now there is a bug12:52
mac_vcursor*12:53
micahgok, well I think the firefox behavior is correct12:54
mac_vnah , its wrong , it is difficult for text drag [pictures maybe ok]12:55
micahgI just tested it, I'd want the cursor to show me where line one is going to be, not where the hand is.12:56
micahgbut you can ask someone else12:57
mac_vmicahg: when you select from line one the cursor doesnt even exist! only when you go down to line 3 the cursor shows up in line 112:58
* micahg is too tired...12:58
micahgI won't touch it till tomorrow night12:59
BUGabundofta: chromium specific bug ? http://www.jaiku.com/channel/jaikuengine/presence/5e26f1d963a94a2a9e7e07b00d5324e813:17
BUGabundoanyone else here using chromium could test that??13:17
BUGabundofta                                            20 source packages        (719.1 MiB)             144 binary packages        (24.1 GiB)13:36
BUGabundoyou don't play in service13:36
BUGabundolol13:36
ftaasac, "Rejected: PPA exceeded its size limit (10264.00 of 10240.00 MiB). Ask a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ if you need more space."19:44
BUGabundohey fta19:45
ftaasac, could you please request 15GB?19:45
ftaasac, umd19:45
BUGabundofta: one more ? LOLOL19:45
BUGabundo(01:36:45 PM) freenode: fta                                            20 source packages        (719.1 MiB)             144 binary packages        (24.1 GiB)19:45
BUGabundoI just said that earlier19:45
BUGabundoeheheh19:45
micahgfta: are you going to change the name for Namoroka in the menu for 3.6 daily?19:45
ftamicahg, i did, last friday19:46
micahghmm19:46
ftabut the ppa got some rejects, maybe in today's builds19:46
BUGabundoyeah19:46
micahgI just upgraded and it still says minefield 3.619:46
micahgah19:46
micahgok19:46
BUGabundomine is called Namoroka19:46
BUGabundobut gnome do still see minefield19:47
BUGabundo:\\19:47
BUGabundoI have TWO minefields on menu eheh19:47
BUGabundo3.6 and 3.719:47
micahgright19:47
ftawell, it's always the same, before final, should a snapshot build be called minefield of by its codename?19:49
ftaasac wants minefield, i don't mind either way19:49
micahghmm, I think codename is more appropriate, but it's asac's call19:49
micahgI thought minefield was trunk19:50
ftaa long time ago, i called all the tagged releases by their codename, asac preferred to wait for beta 1 (that was 3.0), then he moved to only final (3.5)19:53
BUGabundofta: the prob for me is that calling minefield from GnomeDO19:54
BUGabundonow it *sees* 3.619:54
BUGabundowhen I want 3.719:54
BUGabundoThe following packages will be upgraded:20:06
BUGabundo  chromium-browser firefox firefox-3.5 firefox-3.5-branding firefox-3.5-gnome-support firefox-3.7 firefox-3.7-branding20:06
BUGabundo  firefox-3.7-gnome-support firefox-gnome-support gwibber xulrunner-1.9.1 xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support xulrunner-1.9.320:06
BUGabundothis is going to start to hurt20:06
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000
ftaBUGabundo, ?20:33
BUGabundofta: have you seen the size of this updates daily ?20:34
ftawell, no one forces you do use them20:35
BUGabundodinner bbl20:39
BUGabundowho is going to test them then???20:39
BUGabundopfff20:39
BUGabundono need to thank me :\\\20:39
ftaCVE-2009-241620:42
ftaCVE 2009-241620:42
ftaCVE 2009 241620:42
ftahm20:42
fta!cvz20:43
ubottuSorry, I don't know anything about cvz20:43
fta!cve20:43
ubottuSorry, I don't know anything about cve20:43
micahghttp://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-241620:47
ftayep, found it, i'm just glad google finally fixed chromium20:54
ftai reported it to them when it landed in ubuntu20:55
mac_vfta: hi... could you look at this > Bug #41395021:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Incorrect cursor positioning in Firefox." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41395021:02
micahgmac_v: fta doesn't do bugs21:02
mac_vah... sorry fta :)21:03
mac_vi was hoping he would know what the problem was21:03
BUGabundoI'm pissed21:16
BUGabundolaptop halted  with no aparent reason during dinner and FF lost an entire session loaded with Android wikis :(21:16
BUGabundoit should be able to restore it, but no..... only offers an older one :( FAIL21:17
BUGabundofta: kde systemsetting is listing 3.5 as Shiretoko Web Browser21:20
BUGabundo3.6 as Minefield 3.6 Web Browser21:21
BUGabundo3.7 Minefield 3.7 Web Browser21:21
BUGabundoBleed Browser21:21
BUGabundoBrowse the Bleeding Edge21:21
BUGabundoLOLOLOL21:21
ftaBUGabundo, if all are from umd, that's expected21:26
BUGabundonot all21:26
BUGabundoI think 3.5 is archive21:27
BUGabundo  Installed: 3.5.3~hg20090816r26247+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd121:27
BUGabundonope its daily21:27
BUGabundo3.5.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu221:27
BUGabundoits higher now21:27
ftadowngrade then21:44
BUGabundofta: why?21:45
BUGabundoI won't use it21:45
BUGabundoactually I haven't used 3.0 or 3.5 for many months21:45
ftaok21:45
BUGabundoonly do it for testing purpose21:45
BUGabundoI'm running 3.6, and today started 3.721:45
BUGabundoif it wasn't for the depencies, I would remove 3.5 :\21:46
BUGabundoguud night23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!