[00:04] so my old .mozilla/firefox should have become .mozilla/firefox.3.0-replaces and .mozilla/firefox-3.5 would become .mozilla/firefox - so seems sane [00:04] penguin42: yes. [00:04] penguin42: question is: does your old firefox 3.0 profile look like hte one you have now? [00:04] I just don't see my 3.5 old profile in there :( [00:04] penguin42: also did you have firefox 3.0 still running when you did this migration? [00:05] penguin42: that might be interesting and we should put a safety net in the script i think [00:05] nor I remember seeing the question when I test-run the migration before it hit the archive [00:05] asac_: Good question; I think I had firefox-3.5 running when this migration happened possibly? [00:05] BUGabundo: it was in ppa for 1 or 2 days before going to archive [00:05] penguin42: hmm. that shouldnt be that bad i think === asac_ is now known as asac [00:06] in any case it shouldnt migrate if anything is still running [00:06] rather pop up a dialog saying: "stop all firefox instances first" [00:06] asac: ? What in that script detect sthat? [00:06] but we did the same for firefox 2->3 migration [00:06] and had almost no complains [00:06] penguin42: it doesnt do that atm [00:06] we would have to do something new for that [00:07] ah right - I didn't think I could see anything.... [00:07] asac: The thing is the state I was in after migration was no old bookmarks, no browser history or any other data [00:10] asac: IMHO that script needs to create a log of what it did, when and also needs error checking on it's shell commands [00:13] * penguin42 finds his firefox.3.0-replaced has a firefox subdirectory [00:16] I think that script has tried to do the move twice [00:18] asac: OK, try this scenario - I don't know if it's what happened or not; I click a link that runs /usr/bin/firefox and then click it again before I notice the dialog; both instances bring up dialogs, and I answer 'keep 3.5 settings' to one, then I see the 2nd dialog and I think 'shrug, it didn't do it - ok, same again' and click 'keep 3.5 settings' [00:20] ahha! [00:20] yes [00:22] BUGabundo: Can you look inside your firefox.3.0-replaced and see if you have a firefox dir? [00:23] looking [00:23] don't think so [00:23] only looks like old 3.0 profiles [00:24] ok [00:27] * penguin42 updates the bug [00:34] asac: See comment in the bug [00:42] in other fun and excitement - since the last few weeks I've been getting flash related crashes - commonly if I kill nspluginwrapper firefox seems to go with it - I'd never seen that before ~3 weeks ago [01:19] hohum [03:00] Anyone: when will firefox 3.5 be available for jaunty? [03:03] rigo, just install firefox-3.5 [03:03] it's been there since release [03:04] micahg: I'm refering to canonical's official version [03:05] ugh, it may or may not be [03:05] rigo: It's the same browser [03:10] micahg: k thanks === ripps_ is now known as ripps [11:07] good morning [11:46] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2a2pre) Gecko/20090815 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Namoroka/3.6a2pre ID:20090815003024 [11:46] humm Namoroka kewl [11:49] BUGabundo: I told you Friday that 3.6 is no longer trunk [11:50] did u» [11:50] don't recall it [11:50] glad I run trunk ppa then :) [11:51] yep, 3.7 is ther [11:51] *there [11:51] I guess it's time to upgrade :) [11:51] * BUGabundo looks [11:51] firefox-3.7 - 3.7~a1~hg20090815r31585+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 [11:51] alpha 1? [11:52] it's trunk [11:52] 3.6 just got pre alpha 2 [11:52] olol [11:52] trunk stays alpha until right before it branches AFAIK [11:52] so I just need firefox-3.7-gnome-support ? [11:52] it should pull everything else right? [11:52] If you're using gvfs yes [11:52] yes [11:53] ok [11:53] firefox-3.7{a} firefox-3.7-branding{a} firefox-3.7-gnome-support xulrunner-1.9.3{a} xulrunner-1.9.3-gnome-support{a} [11:53] there goes ALL my addons again :) [11:53] ooh, didn't know where was xulrunner gnome support [11:53] BUGabundo: you have the override extension though [11:54] if it doesn't break ;) [11:55] well I'll force them to work. [11:55] but not to work WELL [11:55] several addons are broken on 3.6 [11:55] like greasemonkey [11:55] tabmixplus [11:55] updir [11:55] nosquint [11:55] stuff I use *daily* [11:56] bbl [12:22] wow , micahg sleeps only for 4 hrs ! 0.o [12:22] or even less! [12:22] mac_v: never made it to sleep yet :) [12:22] will go to sleep in about 1.5 hours [12:22] it's morning already [12:22] but whatever [12:22] did that package work for you? [12:23] yeah... now i have to reconfigure all the settings [12:24] micahg: this there a bug about firefox and the cursor not being in the right spot? [12:24] imena the cursor in firefox! [12:24] i mean* [12:24] you mean seeing a cursor in the text vs a field? [12:25] when i select & drag text , the cursor shows up at a level higher[3-4 lines] that the pointer [12:26] also the cursor lags , when i move it using pointers , could it have something to do with me always having firefox ON? [12:26] but this is a new problem , only after recent updates , and the problem starts even when i start firefox fresh [12:29] I remember just seeing something about that first problem [12:30] bug 413950 [12:30] Launchpad bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Drag in drop in "Organize Bookmarks" is misaligned." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/413950 [12:32] hm... i think it has nothing to do with the bookmarks but just with the cursor positioning... [12:32] agreed, which leads me to believe it's not even a firefox problem [12:33] maybe check on +1 for cursor odditties [12:37] micahg: i thought so too , but the cursor drag works well in other apps , i'm now writing a comment on how to test it. its a problem only in firefox. this has been there for several days, maybe even since alpha3 , i was just too lazy to report it! [12:46] micahg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/413950/comments/2 [12:46] Ubuntu bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Drag in drop in "Organize Bookmarks" is misaligned." [Undecided,Confirmed] [12:46] stupid typos! not I... It* [12:47] mac_v: idk about that [12:48] micahg: hmm... np... I'll ask asac ... should i change the title? and edit the description ? [12:48] it makes sense for the cursor to be where the text would be inserted, line 1 [12:49] what??? i'm confused? the cursor is always located 3 lines higher than the pointer [12:50] doesn't matter, cursor should be next to the first letter that will be inserted [12:50] yeah , exactly, something is wrong in firefox [12:51] no, I think the FF behavior is fine [12:51] if you're hanging a picture, do you want it to settle based on the top, or where your ahnds are? [12:52] micahg: try the same select and drag in text editor , note the pointer is always close to the pointer , this was the behavior , now there is a bug [12:53] cursor* [12:54] ok, well I think the firefox behavior is correct [12:55] nah , its wrong , it is difficult for text drag [pictures maybe ok] [12:56] I just tested it, I'd want the cursor to show me where line one is going to be, not where the hand is. [12:57] but you can ask someone else [12:58] micahg: when you select from line one the cursor doesnt even exist! only when you go down to line 3 the cursor shows up in line 1 [12:58] * micahg is too tired... [12:59] I won't touch it till tomorrow night [13:17] fta: chromium specific bug ? http://www.jaiku.com/channel/jaikuengine/presence/5e26f1d963a94a2a9e7e07b00d5324e8 [13:17] anyone else here using chromium could test that?? [13:36] fta 20 source packages (719.1 MiB) 144 binary packages (24.1 GiB) [13:36] you don't play in service [13:36] lol [19:44] asac, "Rejected: PPA exceeded its size limit (10264.00 of 10240.00 MiB). Ask a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ if you need more space." [19:45] hey fta [19:45] asac, could you please request 15GB? [19:45] asac, umd [19:45] fta: one more ? LOLOL [19:45] (01:36:45 PM) freenode: fta 20 source packages (719.1 MiB) 144 binary packages (24.1 GiB) [19:45] I just said that earlier [19:45] eheheh [19:45] fta: are you going to change the name for Namoroka in the menu for 3.6 daily? [19:46] micahg, i did, last friday [19:46] hmm [19:46] but the ppa got some rejects, maybe in today's builds [19:46] yeah [19:46] I just upgraded and it still says minefield 3.6 [19:46] ah [19:46] ok [19:46] mine is called Namoroka [19:47] but gnome do still see minefield [19:47] :\\ [19:47] I have TWO minefields on menu eheh [19:47] 3.6 and 3.7 [19:47] right [19:49] well, it's always the same, before final, should a snapshot build be called minefield of by its codename? [19:49] asac wants minefield, i don't mind either way [19:49] hmm, I think codename is more appropriate, but it's asac's call [19:50] I thought minefield was trunk [19:53] a long time ago, i called all the tagged releases by their codename, asac preferred to wait for beta 1 (that was 3.0), then he moved to only final (3.5) [19:54] fta: the prob for me is that calling minefield from GnomeDO [19:54] now it *sees* 3.6 [19:54] when I want 3.7 [20:06] The following packages will be upgraded: [20:06] chromium-browser firefox firefox-3.5 firefox-3.5-branding firefox-3.5-gnome-support firefox-3.7 firefox-3.7-branding [20:06] firefox-3.7-gnome-support firefox-gnome-support gwibber xulrunner-1.9.1 xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support xulrunner-1.9.3 [20:06] this is going to start to hurt === Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 [20:33] BUGabundo, ? [20:34] fta: have you seen the size of this updates daily ? [20:35] well, no one forces you do use them [20:39] dinner bbl [20:39] who is going to test them then??? [20:39] pfff [20:39] no need to thank me :\\\ [20:42] CVE-2009-2416 [20:42] CVE 2009-2416 [20:42] CVE 2009 2416 [20:42] hm [20:43] !cvz [20:43] Sorry, I don't know anything about cvz [20:43] !cve [20:43] Sorry, I don't know anything about cve [20:47] http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-2416 [20:54] yep, found it, i'm just glad google finally fixed chromium [20:55] i reported it to them when it landed in ubuntu [21:02] fta: hi... could you look at this > Bug #413950 [21:02] Launchpad bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Incorrect cursor positioning in Firefox." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/413950 [21:02] mac_v: fta doesn't do bugs [21:03] ah... sorry fta :) [21:03] i was hoping he would know what the problem was [21:16] I'm pissed [21:16] laptop halted with no aparent reason during dinner and FF lost an entire session loaded with Android wikis :( [21:17] it should be able to restore it, but no..... only offers an older one :( FAIL [21:20] fta: kde systemsetting is listing 3.5 as Shiretoko Web Browser [21:21] 3.6 as Minefield 3.6 Web Browser [21:21] 3.7 Minefield 3.7 Web Browser [21:21] Bleed Browser [21:21] Browse the Bleeding Edge [21:21] LOLOLOL [21:26] BUGabundo, if all are from umd, that's expected [21:26] not all [21:27] I think 3.5 is archive [21:27] Installed: 3.5.3~hg20090816r26247+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd1 [21:27] nope its daily [21:27] 3.5.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 [21:27] its higher now [21:44] downgrade then [21:45] fta: why? [21:45] I won't use it [21:45] actually I haven't used 3.0 or 3.5 for many months [21:45] ok [21:45] only do it for testing purpose [21:45] I'm running 3.6, and today started 3.7 [21:46] if it wasn't for the depencies, I would remove 3.5 :\ [23:42] guud night