/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/17/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== asac_ is now known as asac
e-jatfta : is there any issue for chromium with flash in 4.0.202.0 (23528) build?02:15
micahgsure06:23
asacola10:06
andvhi asac!10:07
andvhow was your weekend?10:07
asacall good10:15
andvwent to the sea?10:15
andvor city?10:15
asaci am in the middle of the city ;)10:16
andvoh :D10:16
andvI've sent you a mail with some details10:16
asacno time right now ... talk to you later10:17
andvlike 2-3 days ago don't remember10:17
andvyeah, np :)10:17
* asac fights tb10:17
andvtb = technical board?10:18
asactbird10:18
andvooh :)10:18
andvasac, anyway ffox rocks now10:18
andvI've installed all upgrades10:18
andvand everything seems to work great atm10:18
andvsame thing for latest tb10:18
mac_vasac: hi... could you look at this > Bug #41395010:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 413950 in firefox-3.5 "Incorrect cursor positioning in Firefox." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41395010:40
asacone moment please10:41
mac_vno problem10:41
asacmac_v: i dont see any cursor when dragging in a lp comments field10:43
mac_vthe cursor,on grab,is always higher than the pointer :( , this is different from other apps where the cursor is always closer to the pointer , this is only in firefox3.5 not in fireofx3.0 , earlier i thought that the cursor was wrong throughout the system and didnt report it, but works well elsewhere even in firefox 3.010:43
asacmac_v: i have some similar report against tbird10:44
asacs/i/we/10:44
asaclike you drag and drop mails to a folder and it highlights something completely offset (higher)=10:45
asacmac_v: anyway. i dont even see any cursor atm ;)10:45
asacthats what i tried to say10:45
mac_vactually you are supposed to see the cursor , if you type several lines, greater than 3 , you'll notice the problem10:45
mac_vjust copy paste in the comments field10:46
asacyes ok i see it10:46
asacmac_v: can you check upstream build and when you see it there, please forward upstream?10:46
asac;)10:46
mac_vasac: but notice the drag while in bookmarks , [not in organize] , just the drop down , the cursor alligns properly10:47
mac_vupstream build? i'm sorry i have several other bugs as of now , i dont want firefox to be messed up either10:47
asacmac_v: probably a different beast10:47
mac_vs/either/also10:48
asacmac_v: its mostly riskfree to run upstream tarball10:48
mac_vhm...ok .. which build do you recommend? could you give me a version?10:48
asacmac_v: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.5.2/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-3.5.2.tar.bz210:50
asacjust unpack it in your home10:50
asacto be extra safe, backup your $HOME/.mozilla directory10:50
mac_valready backed up ;)10:51
asacgood10:53
asachttps://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/8022711:15
fta2thanks11:17
andvasac, what's the bindwood status atm?11:19
andvasac, I can take care of maintaining it if you want11:19
andvis it ubuntu-specific or can be uploaded in debian as well?11:19
asachave a call now ... talk to you in ~1h11:27
andvk perfect11:27
bdrung_asac: can you have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/new-upstream-release-1.1.1/+merge/1004913:07
fta2asac, wrt https://code.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/firefox/firefox-3.5-apparmor/+merge/10109, a/ it doesn't follow our d/changelog style and b/ there's no profile at all?? so it's not doing anything..13:53
asacfta2: ok thanks. i asked to resubmit with profile13:59
asacbdrung_: looks good. what about debian?14:08
asacbdrung_: hmm. the tagging feels a bit wrong14:09
asacbdrung_: so maybe oneshouldnt do a release commit on the topic branch14:10
asac bzr tags14:10
asac1.1-0ubuntu1         4714:10
asac1.1.1-0ubuntu1       47.1.414:10
asace.g. it doesnt really refer to the real revision that goes up14:10
asaci will remove the tag and retagg the committed merge14:10
asacdone14:10
andvasac, 3 things14:11
andvwhen you have a minute14:12
andvasac, first of all: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/+merge/865214:14
andvthen bindwood status14:14
andvthen the mail I've sent you14:14
asacandv: yes i have it on my list. and will get back to you ... if not during day i will send a mail14:21
andvasac, ok great, I've sent you one more email like 3 minutes ago14:22
andvwith another great news14:22
mac_vhmm... is there a way to backup fireox history? or to print the history?14:27
mac_vfirefox* not OX! ;p14:27
mac_vasac: is it possible to backup/print-to-file history?14:33
asacmac_v: not sure what you mean14:40
mac_vasac: we can backup bookmarks , similarly web history? how can we same it? i have history for1 yrs and it slows down the browser when i open history , so i was thinking i could split it14:42
mac_vlike how routers note down the history14:43
mac_vasac: hmm... i'v been able to save the history as bookmarks , can be print bookmarks?14:46
mac_vs/save/copy14:46
mac_vsheesh! so many typos! >  i'v been able to copy the history to bookmarks , can we print bookmarks?14:47
asacmac_v: i dont know why you would want to print bookmarks ;)14:48
asacso no ... i dont know how to do that. i guess there is an extension for that14:48
asacfor history you can say how many days should be kept14:49
asaci would suggest to not keep more than 90 days14:49
mac_vi'v searched didnt find any so thought i'd ask sensei ;p14:50
asacmac_v: export html ... isnt good enough?15:01
asacoh you say for history15:01
asacyeah. i dont know then15:01
mac_vasac: hmm... ok ,i think i'm getting to find a workaround..  so I'v tried to save the history as bookmark , but its split up in last day/7days/1month... is there a way for the history to show all history? together15:04
mac_vwhere is the history file located actually?15:06
asacmac_v: thats in places.sqlite from what i know15:07
mac_voh... :(15:07
asacjdstrand: hi ;)15:18
jdstrando/15:23
asacjdstrand: did you forget the profile in the merge or was it codebrowse that failed to show "new" files?15:28
jdstrandasac: heheh15:29
jdstrandasac: I forgot15:29
=== jtv is now known as jtv-brb
asacjdstrand: ok. please resubmit and if possible use the same changelog format we use ;) ... if not i can shuffle that during merge15:31
asaci think its just "push" ;)15:31
jdstrandasac: ok, files added, changelog updated and it's all pushed to lp:~jdstrand/firefox/firefox-3.5-apparmor15:34
* jdstrand hates it when he forgets to 'bzr add'15:35
asachehe15:35
asacno problem15:35
asacok will merge that after i get this tbird stuff done15:36
jdstrandasac: thanks! :)15:36
=== jtv-brb is now known as jtv
fta2asac, fyi, everything rejected for umd15:56
fta2oops, no, it's not today's batch15:57
asacfta2: heh?15:59
fta2nm15:59
asacyou mean it took more than one day?15:59
asacah ok15:59
asacoh you probably ment for space reasons15:59
asacyeah. lets wait a day and see if they bump our size15:59
fta2http://paste.ubuntu.com/254562/16:15
fta2http://paste.ubuntu.com/254563/16:17
fta2gaps, /tmp/builddeb-get-orig-source-63gvPk/export/chromium-browser-2225/src/webkit/...16:48
fta2bd now uses /tmp ??? bad16:48
sveinunghello. I'm still working on getting all-in-one-sidebar ready for Debian. I have some questions that I hope will be answered when you have time.17:13
sveinungasac: How should I set up the maintainer field? You mentioned team maintainance. Should I put myself in maintainer or uploader? Who else should I put in those fields?17:13
sveinungIn what location should the bzr-tree be hosted? Is firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian OK? That will make it possible to still make separate changes to Ubuntu (like Ubuntu binMMUs). Since I don't have write access there I have temporarily put it in lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian17:13
sveinung( https://code.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian )17:14
andvsveinung, hi!18:00
andvasac, I've answered to your mail ;)18:00
sveinunghello18:01
andvsveinung, you know who i am?18:01
andvI reviewed/ sponsored all in one sidebar for you like 2 weeks ago18:01
sveinungI suspected that :)18:01
andv:)18:01
andvwhat's up?18:02
sveinungI'm trying to get it into Debian now18:02
andvI can maintain it with you18:02
andvif you want18:02
sveinungsure18:02
andvwhat did asac tell you?18:03
andvdid he suggest something to you'18:03
andvsveinung, asac is pretty busy so ping me next time18:03
sveinungandv: ok18:05
andvsveinung, did he suggest you something already?18:05
sveinungI'm looking it up18:06
sveinungfound it: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/13/%23ubuntu-mozillateam.html18:06
sveinunghe said that it was OK to put the branch under firefox-extensions18:06
sveinungand "we want to jointly maintain it i guess"18:07
andvsveinung, actually you'll have to drop all changelog entries18:08
andvfrom Ubuntu18:08
sveinungwhy?18:08
andvbecause you are releasing a software in debian18:08
andvso the package must be clean18:08
sveinungit's still permitted to keep the changelog entries18:08
andvyes, but why keeping them?18:08
andvwho cares?18:09
andvsveinung, you do the package again18:09
andvfor debian18:09
sveinungandv: for example the script that imports debian packages into bazaar18:09
andv?18:10
andvwe gonna sync it18:10
andvwhen it's in debian18:10
andvso you gonna drop all entries anyway18:10
andv(changelog entries)18:10
andvI guess you know that a package which gets synced in ubuntu18:10
sveinunghttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/DebianImportSpecification18:11
andvloses all changelog entries18:11
sveinungI meant this18:11
andvI don't get what your problem18:11
andvyou do the package in debian18:11
andvwe will upload it18:11
sveinungI also think it's nice to keep that sort of data18:11
andvwhich data?18:12
sveinungthe changelog entries18:12
andvif all changes are integrated18:12
andvyou don't have to report those entries again18:12
andvhow the changelog will look like?18:12
andvchanges appears under unstable (by emanuele gentili for istance)18:13
andvand they never touched unstable ground18:13
andvbefore18:13
sveinungdon't know if I will be able to formulate myself good enough in English right now18:14
sveinungbut I'll try18:14
andvplease explain me what's the rationale to keep them18:14
andvand I'll try to understand you18:14
sveinungIt's just nice to have those entries since you then have a bit more history for the package in a machine readable format18:15
sveinungso you later can do things to those data18:15
andvthose data?18:15
andvyou can make changes to 'those data' without having those changelog entries18:16
andvI assume you merged all ubuntu changes into the future debian package18:16
sveinungfor example the Ubuntu Distributed Importer, when creating a branch from a package, will check if there are Ubuntu entries to see what will come first18:16
andvremoving changelog entries does NOT mean you have to remove the changes reported in them18:16
sveinungI know18:16
andvso, I don't get why we need to have those entries then18:17
sveinungIt's not for us but for programs reding it. So one for example can see that the package originated in Ubuntu ()but don't get me wrong, I'm not fanatical about this18:18
andvyou won't use the autogenerated branch anyway18:18
sveinungI know18:18
andvyou gonna keep usinh YOUR branch18:18
sveinungit was just an example18:18
andvif you really wanna keep all changes reported in those entries18:18
andvintegrate everything in ONE entry18:19
andvso together with * Initial release. (Closes: #000000)18:19
andvyou'll add18:19
andv* modified watch file18:19
andv* modified debian/foo18:19
andvor whatever18:19
andvI hope you've understood a bit18:19
andvwhat integrating old entries mean18:20
andvold entries integrated in a main one which will be the initial release18:20
andvsveinung, another problem18:21
andvif you wanna keep those entries18:21
andvyou'll have to license the packaging side18:21
andvwhich is useless and time-loss work18:21
andvyou usually license your package under the same license as upstream it is18:21
sveinunglast time they said it was already licensed18:21
sveinungsince it wasn't specified it was assumed it was the same as upstrem18:22
sveinung*upstrem18:22
sveinung*upstream18:22
andvsveinung, look at the changelog18:22
andvapart from asac changes which seem to be relevant18:23
andv(and your ones)18:23
andvdo you see any other important change?18:23
sveinungthe initial packaging?18:23
andv  * debian/control:18:23
andv   + added Homepage field.18:23
andv   + Update Standards-Version.18:23
andvfor istance18:23
andvare not so important to be added on the next debian package you're making18:23
andvor not?18:23
andvnono, the current version18:23
andvwe have on karmic18:23
sveinungandv: I'm sorry. My head don't work right now. I need food, and to eat I have to go home. Could we take this on email?18:24
andvit will take ages on email I guess18:24
sveinung(I could try to talk a bit more if email isn't OK for you)18:24
andvgive me branch url18:25
sveinungthank you wery much!18:25
sveinunghttps://code.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian18:25
sveinungooh, sorry18:25
sveinungmisread18:25
andvcan you tell me which debian-specific18:26
andvchanges you did18:26
sveinungandv: the naming (no ubuntuX at the end)18:27
sveinungand putting myself as maintainer temporarily18:28
andvdependencies are now taken from xpi:depends18:28
andvI see18:28
sveinungthe rest could apply to Ubuntu as well18:28
andvI gonna have my debian box ready soon18:28
andvso I can test it18:28
sveinungexcept the closes18:28
sveinunggood18:28
andvI'll have to do some fixes18:28
andvto the packaging side18:28
andvthen I have to check out lintian18:29
andvand other stuff18:29
sveinungone lintian warining will be fixed when mozilla-devscripts v 15 comes out18:29
andvsveinung, ok18:30
sveinungMOZ_XPI_DOCUMENTED_LICENSE_FILES is introduced in v 1518:30
sveinungshould I commit and push the code that uses it?18:30
andvsveinung, so are you OK to cooperate with me maintaining this package?18:30
sveinungof course18:30
andvperfect18:30
andvyou'll be the maintainer, I gonna add myself in the uploaders field as co-maintainer18:30
sveinunggreat18:31
andvso I've fixed asac a problem since he's busy doing his stuff18:31
andvdo you own an itp bug already?18:31
sveinungyes18:31
andvok perfect18:31
andvsveinung, is there a way I can work on your branch?18:32
andvactually just you is able to upload to that branch18:32
sveinungI know. It was just ment to be temporary18:32
sveinungfeel free to change it18:32
andvis there a way to upload to a same branch?18:33
sveinung(the location)18:33
andvapart creating a new team18:33
sveinungI don't know18:33
andvI guess you can co-maintain a branch on teams only18:34
sveinungsorry, I don't undersatand18:36
sveinung*understand18:36
andvfor co-maintaining a branch18:37
andve.g both me and you can upload to it18:37
andvthe only way is having a team18:37
andvI'll ask asac how can we do18:37
sveinungok18:37
andvok, going to prepare dinner18:39
andvbe back later18:39
sveinungI'll to be back later18:39
sveinungandv: Now that I have gotten myself food and some fresh air I think I understand what you meant when we were talking about the changelog. Were you talking about doing the packaging again from scrach?19:39
sveinungAs I said my head wasn't working 100% when I read it. I believed you talked about uploading the Ubuntu one.19:40
sveinungWe can do it from scarch if you want to, and I agree that in that case we should drop the changelog entries.19:40
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
andvsveinung, yep19:49
andvthat's what I meant19:49
andvsveinung, I have to go, be back in 3 hours if you are here19:50
sveinungsure19:50
andvsee ya later19:50
sveinungAnd sorry about the misunderstanding. I had been on campus all day but since I forgot my money I hadn't eaten19:50
sveinungor taken breaks from the computer19:51
BUGabundohi19:51
pace_t_zuluhow's it BUGabundo?19:52
BUGabundowit a dyeing PA19:53
andvsveinung, np20:03
andvsveinung, after we decide the branch location20:04
andvsveinung, we gonna start a brand new debian branch20:04
andvwith a clean changelog20:04
sveinungk20:04
andvand with a working package for debian20:04
andvsveinung, do you have a box to test it too?20:05
sveinungyes20:05
sveinungI have lenny on my laptop20:05
sveinungog Squeeze on my stationary20:05
sveinung*and20:06
andvperfect20:06
andvbuild the package from the branch you linked me before20:06
andvinstall the package20:06
andvand test it on lenny20:06
andv* squeeze20:07
andvsorry20:07
andvnot lenny20:07
andvtest it on squeeze which is quite near to si20:07
andv* sid20:07
andvas build depends and so on20:07
sveinungsure20:07
andvand give me a feedback20:07
andvasac, do you know where we can host that branch?20:08
andvasac, do mozilla team have some space to host the all in one branch?20:08
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
andvsveinung, ok have to go20:10
sveinungandv: ok20:10
andvtalk to you later and if asac gets back ask him about the branch thing20:10
andvasac, I've replied to your mail already20:11
andv;)20:11
andvcya later20:11
andvand thanks for your work on this sveinung20:11
sveinungandv: thanks for co maintaining :)20:11
andvnp20:11
* andv off20:11
ftaasac, could you please give me the branch urls, ppa names, etc, for the nm dailies so i can start it?20:14
ftaasac, ... and the nickname you want.. nmd?21:18
=== sveinung_ is now known as sveinung
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
micahgasac: are you around?22:08
BUGabundohe was , a few minutes agot22:09
asacfta: nmt?23:11
BUGabundoasac: still no reply from fta :)23:12
asacBUGabundo: he asked me something ... i answered ;)23:13
andvasac, did you read backlog?23:13
andvI've decided to co-maintain all in one sidebar with sveinung23:13
andvin debian23:13
asacandv: we usually use ~ubuntu-dev for extension23:13
andvproblem is finding a place to host the branch23:13
asacand non -devs drive the branch by requesting merged that you can push or merge23:14
asacuse ubuntu-dev ... thats the right place to put it23:14
andvare you sure?23:14
fta* Disconnected (Network is unreachable).23:14
andvit is meant for debian23:14
asacandv: it is ment for debian and then to be synched down afaik23:15
andvyep23:15
asacwhy have two branches?23:15
ftablank between 23:17 and 23:3923:15
andvyou suggest to merge the existing one?23:15
asacandv: i have no clue about current status23:15
andvI added you as reviewer23:15
andvlike 2 weeks ago23:15
ftaasac, can you add the debian link please?23:15
asacandv: i think in a perfect world you have one branch that is for latest debian/ubuntu23:15
asacand when debian freezes you create a stable debian branch23:15
andvagreed23:16
andvI've sent you the review request23:16
asacandv: and if ubuntu freezes you crate a ubuntu stable branch23:16
asacetc.23:16
asacfta: i think that breaks stuff23:16
andvyou have to accept it for the ubuntu-dev branch23:16
andve.g sveinung merged it from his branch to ubuntu-dev one23:16
ftaasac, ?23:16
andvbut needs approval23:16
asacfta: the build bot cannot deal with debian only branches?23:17
asachmm23:17
asacshould have been obvious23:17
bdrung_asac: can you add a comment to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BenjaminDrung/MOTUApplication ?23:17
asacbdrung_: i was going to ... when does that need to happen?23:17
ftaasac, some parts of the bot expect debian/changelog, or debian/control23:18
bdrung_asac: application is on 27th August23:18
bdrung_so there is enough time23:19
ftaasac, i call dch somewhere23:19
asacfta: yeah ... dch -c changelog is what we use23:19
asacbut let me check23:19
asaci think i should give up on debian only then23:20
andvasac, do you suggest to merge the existing ubuntu branch or to create a new one?23:21
andvasac, if you wanna keep the old one, just have a look here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/+merge/865223:22
asacfta: ok moved all files to debian/ dir23:26
asacon applet and nm branch23:26
ftathanks23:26
ftaasac, do you want/need chained deps?23:26
ftabuild-deps23:27
asacfta: for now i dont think we need it23:27
asacfta: if we need it ill let you know23:27
asacapi moves slowely23:27
ftaok23:27
asacandv: ok checking the all-in-one branch23:28
andvasac, perfect thanks23:28
andvasac, if accepted I gonna move tomorrow to fix some stuff23:28
ftaasac, you said "nmt", why t? i used nmd, but i can change23:28
andvthen it will be ready23:28
BUGabundofta: "(11:27:04 PM) cabrey: Native !chromium 64 being developed? http://is.gd/2lFfR !linux"23:29
ftaBUGabundo, i don't need that, i already have the package ready23:29
BUGabundoI know23:30
ftai just don't want to break too many people so i'm waiting for it to be a little bit more usable23:30
BUGabundothat's what I told him23:30
BUGabundobtw, when will it it the PPA?23:30
asacfta: because we used nmt before for that repo23:32
ftaasac, ok23:32
asacfor me its Network-Manager Trunk -> ~network-manager/+archive/trunk23:32
asacandv: i am not so sure about the changelog addition of the 1.4.7-0ubuntu223:32
asacare we sure we also have the changes done in that release?23:32
BUGabundofta: FF3.7 started to stuck on FullScreen today23:33
asachmm23:33
andvasac, the change was about adding a watch file plus adding homepage field on control?23:33
asacandv: ok seems ok23:33
asacandv: yes. but where did he merge it from?23:33
andvfrom the archive23:33
asachttp://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/revision/2523:33
asacwas there a contributor?23:33
andvyes23:33
andva contributor added those23:33
andvwithout asking here23:33
andvbut as I already said to sveinung23:34
asacno what i mean ... that commit is a [merge] so he must have merged it from somewhere23:34
andvthe changelog will be cleaned23:34
asacbut i am not sure where it came from23:34
andvso all those entries will be removed23:34
andvin debian23:34
asacandv: why will the changelog be cleaned?23:34
asacandv: thats not right.23:34
asacif you share them you keep them23:34
andvhe integrated all changes23:35
andvso why adding all those entries?23:35
asacwhy not23:35
andvanyway he merged those changes from the package on archive23:35
asacits the same history23:35
asacno sense in keeping two branches23:35
andva contributor uploaded that revision23:35
andvsveinung didnt notice it but I did23:35
andvand he added it23:35
andvtogether with the changes23:35
andvso it's not a real merge23:36
andvbut just adding back lost changes23:36
asaci am not talking abouta real merge23:36
asaci am talking about a bzr merge23:36
asacits a _merge_ and i wonder where it comes from23:36
asacbut doesnt matter. its ok23:36
sveinungasac: I did a bzr merge to add the missing revision23:36
andvhow do you know it's a merge??23:36
andvsveinung, where did you take that?23:37
andvdo that contributor have a branch somewhere?23:37
sveinungI branched from the version before23:37
sveinungthen added the revision23:37
sveinungthen merged it into the current revision23:37
andvyou got it from the autogenerated branch right?23:37
ftaasac, done23:37
andvI mean when you upload a package it gets synced as a branch23:38
andvcoz I don't think that contributor opened a branch itself23:38
andvfor all in one sidebar23:38
sveinungno, those are different trees23:38
andvI still don't get where you branched it23:38
andvfrom23:38
andvbut anyway it doesnt matter23:38
asacsveinung: you did the right thing. really great. thanks23:39
asaci approved that merge. in future just use distinct topic names for oyur branches and not the same name as the ~uubuntu-dev branc hname23:39
asaci gave an example in the comment23:39
asacthanks23:39
andvasac, I gonna maintain it together with sveinung in debian23:40
andvif you are satisfied with it23:40
sveinungasac: sure, I'll remember that23:40
asacandv: i dont think there are two maintainers needed for an extension ;)23:41
asacjust add yourself as an uploaders: and you can help sponsoring that stuff23:41
andvasac, yep23:41
andvthat's what i wanted23:41
andvasac, I've answered to your mail23:41
asacsveinung: consider to use a .bzr-builddeb/default.conf for the next revision23:42
asacandv knows what it does23:42
andvyep gonna take care of it23:42
andvnp23:42
asacandv: i added it now in the merge23:43
asacso it will be o n~ubnutu-dev23:44
andvgreat23:44
andvasac, I'll keep all changelog entries then23:45
andvdidnt want to23:45
andvbut I trust the way you wanna do it23:45
asacok i pushed it ... you seem to have uploaded to archive without pushing a merge?23:46
asacthats bad practice23:46
asacyou cannot upload something you didnt push ... or that is waiting another review23:46
asacanyway. i hope it was now really the same that is now on the branch23:46
andv?23:46
asacandv: the version i just merged is already in karmic23:46
andvI took the uploaded package from the branch you merged right now23:46
asacandv: yes. but it might be different23:47
andvI hadnt access to that branch anyway23:47
asacnever upload anything before it lands on the release branch23:47
asacandv: you had23:47
asacthats the whole point of having it in ~ubuntu-dev23:47
ftaasac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30433198/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.modemmanager_0.2.git.20090817t181641.ca767e4-0ubuntu1~nmt1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz23:47
asacso that anyone who can upload can also push23:47
andvasac, you merged it right now23:47
andvso how could it be on ubuntu-dev two weeks ago?23:47
andvthe updated version23:48
andvI mean23:48
asachmm23:48
asacandv: either you dont upload or you push it there23:48
asacfta: thats interesting. wonder if that has something to do with the debian dir movage23:48
asacandv: anyway ok for now.23:49
andvasac, I gonna fix some stuff23:49
andvand then it's ready for debian23:50
ftaasac, no, all karmic are red, jaunty is green (so far)23:50
andvthen I'll test it on my debian box23:50
andvtogether with sveinung23:50
andvsveinung, you there?23:52
andvsveinung, we gonna keep just one branch23:52
sveinungandv: yes, I'm here23:53
andvsveinung, so please re-add all changes you did on the ubuntu-dev branch23:53
andvsveinung, you made a .debian branch before with some changes23:53
andvplease merge them into the ubuntu-dev23:53
andvbranch23:53
sveinungit's still on launchpad23:53
andvasac, but having it on ubuntu-dev will make sveinung unable to push to it23:54
andvsveinung, do something nice23:55
andvsveinung, apply the .debian changes23:55
andvto the .ubuntu branch23:55
andvthen ask a merge again23:55
andvand add me as reviewer23:55
andvthen remove the .debian branch23:56
andvit will be useless at that point23:56
andvasac, but having it on ubuntu-dev will make sveinung unable to push to it23:56
andv* asac_23:56
sveinungandv: sure23:56
andvsveinung, let me know when done23:56
andvso I review / accept the changes23:57
andvso the package can be ready for tomorrow23:57
ftaasac, weird https://edge.launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive/trunk23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!