[02:15] <e-jat> fta : is there any issue for chromium with flash in 4.0.202.0 (23528) build?
[06:23] <micahg> sure
[10:06] <asac> ola
[10:07] <andv> hi asac!
[10:07] <andv> how was your weekend?
[10:15] <asac> all good
[10:15] <andv> went to the sea?
[10:15] <andv> or city?
[10:16] <asac> i am in the middle of the city ;)
[10:16] <andv> oh :D
[10:16] <andv> I've sent you a mail with some details
[10:17] <asac> no time right now ... talk to you later
[10:17] <andv> like 2-3 days ago don't remember
[10:17] <andv> yeah, np :)
[10:17]  * asac fights tb
[10:18] <andv> tb = technical board?
[10:18] <asac> tbird
[10:18] <andv> ooh :)
[10:18] <andv> asac, anyway ffox rocks now
[10:18] <andv> I've installed all upgrades
[10:18] <andv> and everything seems to work great atm
[10:18] <andv> same thing for latest tb
[10:40] <mac_v> asac: hi... could you look at this > Bug #413950
[10:41] <asac> one moment please
[10:41] <mac_v> no problem
[10:43] <asac> mac_v: i dont see any cursor when dragging in a lp comments field
[10:43] <mac_v> the cursor,on grab,is always higher than the pointer :( , this is different from other apps where the cursor is always closer to the pointer , this is only in firefox3.5 not in fireofx3.0 , earlier i thought that the cursor was wrong throughout the system and didnt report it, but works well elsewhere even in firefox 3.0
[10:44] <asac> mac_v: i have some similar report against tbird
[10:44] <asac> s/i/we/
[10:45] <asac> like you drag and drop mails to a folder and it highlights something completely offset (higher)=
[10:45] <asac> mac_v: anyway. i dont even see any cursor atm ;)
[10:45] <asac> thats what i tried to say
[10:45] <mac_v> actually you are supposed to see the cursor , if you type several lines, greater than 3 , you'll notice the problem
[10:46] <mac_v> just copy paste in the comments field
[10:46] <asac> yes ok i see it
[10:46] <asac> mac_v: can you check upstream build and when you see it there, please forward upstream?
[10:46] <asac> ;)
[10:47] <mac_v> asac: but notice the drag while in bookmarks , [not in organize] , just the drop down , the cursor alligns properly
[10:47] <mac_v> upstream build? i'm sorry i have several other bugs as of now , i dont want firefox to be messed up either
[10:47] <asac> mac_v: probably a different beast
[10:48] <mac_v> s/either/also
[10:48] <asac> mac_v: its mostly riskfree to run upstream tarball
[10:48] <mac_v> hm...ok .. which build do you recommend? could you give me a version?
[10:50] <asac> mac_v: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.5.2/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-3.5.2.tar.bz2
[10:50] <asac> just unpack it in your home
[10:50] <asac> to be extra safe, backup your $HOME/.mozilla directory
[10:51] <mac_v> already backed up ;)
[10:53] <asac> good
[11:15] <asac> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/80227
[11:17] <fta2> thanks
[11:19] <andv> asac, what's the bindwood status atm?
[11:19] <andv> asac, I can take care of maintaining it if you want
[11:19] <andv> is it ubuntu-specific or can be uploaded in debian as well?
[11:27] <asac> have a call now ... talk to you in ~1h
[11:27] <andv> k perfect
[13:07] <bdrung_> asac: can you have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/new-upstream-release-1.1.1/+merge/10049
[13:53] <fta2> asac, wrt https://code.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/firefox/firefox-3.5-apparmor/+merge/10109, a/ it doesn't follow our d/changelog style and b/ there's no profile at all?? so it's not doing anything..
[13:59] <asac> fta2: ok thanks. i asked to resubmit with profile
[14:08] <asac> bdrung_: looks good. what about debian?
[14:09] <asac> bdrung_: hmm. the tagging feels a bit wrong
[14:10] <asac> bdrung_: so maybe oneshouldnt do a release commit on the topic branch
[14:10] <asac>  bzr tags
[14:10] <asac> 1.1-0ubuntu1         47
[14:10] <asac> 1.1.1-0ubuntu1       47.1.4
[14:10] <asac> e.g. it doesnt really refer to the real revision that goes up
[14:10] <asac> i will remove the tag and retagg the committed merge
[14:10] <asac> done
[14:11] <andv> asac, 3 things
[14:12] <andv> when you have a minute
[14:14] <andv> asac, first of all: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/+merge/8652
[14:14] <andv> then bindwood status
[14:14] <andv> then the mail I've sent you
[14:21] <asac> andv: yes i have it on my list. and will get back to you ... if not during day i will send a mail
[14:22] <andv> asac, ok great, I've sent you one more email like 3 minutes ago
[14:22] <andv> with another great news
[14:27] <mac_v> hmm... is there a way to backup fireox history? or to print the history?
[14:27] <mac_v> firefox* not OX! ;p
[14:33] <mac_v> asac: is it possible to backup/print-to-file history?
[14:40] <asac> mac_v: not sure what you mean
[14:42] <mac_v> asac: we can backup bookmarks , similarly web history? how can we same it? i have history for1 yrs and it slows down the browser when i open history , so i was thinking i could split it
[14:43] <mac_v> like how routers note down the history
[14:46] <mac_v> asac: hmm... i'v been able to save the history as bookmarks , can be print bookmarks?
[14:46] <mac_v> s/save/copy
[14:47] <mac_v> sheesh! so many typos! >  i'v been able to copy the history to bookmarks , can we print bookmarks?
[14:48] <asac> mac_v: i dont know why you would want to print bookmarks ;)
[14:48] <asac> so no ... i dont know how to do that. i guess there is an extension for that
[14:49] <asac> for history you can say how many days should be kept
[14:49] <asac> i would suggest to not keep more than 90 days
[14:50] <mac_v> i'v searched didnt find any so thought i'd ask sensei ;p
[15:01] <asac> mac_v: export html ... isnt good enough?
[15:01] <asac> oh you say for history
[15:01] <asac> yeah. i dont know then
[15:04] <mac_v> asac: hmm... ok ,i think i'm getting to find a workaround..  so I'v tried to save the history as bookmark , but its split up in last day/7days/1month... is there a way for the history to show all history? together
[15:06] <mac_v> where is the history file located actually?
[15:07] <asac> mac_v: thats in places.sqlite from what i know
[15:07] <mac_v> oh... :(
[15:18] <asac> jdstrand: hi ;)
[15:23] <jdstrand> o/
[15:28] <asac> jdstrand: did you forget the profile in the merge or was it codebrowse that failed to show "new" files?
[15:29] <jdstrand> asac: heheh
[15:29] <jdstrand> asac: I forgot
[15:31] <asac> jdstrand: ok. please resubmit and if possible use the same changelog format we use ;) ... if not i can shuffle that during merge
[15:31] <asac> i think its just "push" ;)
[15:34] <jdstrand> asac: ok, files added, changelog updated and it's all pushed to lp:~jdstrand/firefox/firefox-3.5-apparmor
[15:35]  * jdstrand hates it when he forgets to 'bzr add'
[15:35] <asac> hehe
[15:35] <asac> no problem
[15:36] <asac> ok will merge that after i get this tbird stuff done
[15:36] <jdstrand> asac: thanks! :)
[15:56] <fta2> asac, fyi, everything rejected for umd
[15:57] <fta2> oops, no, it's not today's batch
[15:59] <asac> fta2: heh?
[15:59] <fta2> nm
[15:59] <asac> you mean it took more than one day?
[15:59] <asac> ah ok
[15:59] <asac> oh you probably ment for space reasons
[15:59] <asac> yeah. lets wait a day and see if they bump our size
[16:15] <fta2> http://paste.ubuntu.com/254562/
[16:17] <fta2> http://paste.ubuntu.com/254563/
[16:48] <fta2> gaps, /tmp/builddeb-get-orig-source-63gvPk/export/chromium-browser-2225/src/webkit/...
[16:48] <fta2> bd now uses /tmp ??? bad
[17:13] <sveinung> hello. I'm still working on getting all-in-one-sidebar ready for Debian. I have some questions that I hope will be answered when you have time.
[17:13] <sveinung> asac: How should I set up the maintainer field? You mentioned team maintainance. Should I put myself in maintainer or uploader? Who else should I put in those fields?
[17:13] <sveinung> In what location should the bzr-tree be hosted? Is firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian OK? That will make it possible to still make separate changes to Ubuntu (like Ubuntu binMMUs). Since I don't have write access there I have temporarily put it in lp:~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian
[17:14] <sveinung> ( https://code.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian )
[18:00] <andv> sveinung, hi!
[18:00] <andv> asac, I've answered to your mail ;)
[18:01] <sveinung> hello
[18:01] <andv> sveinung, you know who i am?
[18:01] <andv> I reviewed/ sponsored all in one sidebar for you like 2 weeks ago
[18:01] <sveinung> I suspected that :)
[18:01] <andv> :)
[18:02] <andv> what's up?
[18:02] <sveinung> I'm trying to get it into Debian now
[18:02] <andv> I can maintain it with you
[18:02] <andv> if you want
[18:02] <sveinung> sure
[18:03] <andv> what did asac tell you?
[18:03] <andv> did he suggest something to you'
[18:03] <andv> sveinung, asac is pretty busy so ping me next time
[18:05] <sveinung> andv: ok
[18:05] <andv> sveinung, did he suggest you something already?
[18:06] <sveinung> I'm looking it up
[18:06] <sveinung> found it: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/13/%23ubuntu-mozillateam.html
[18:06] <sveinung> he said that it was OK to put the branch under firefox-extensions
[18:07] <sveinung> and "we want to jointly maintain it i guess"
[18:08] <andv> sveinung, actually you'll have to drop all changelog entries
[18:08] <andv> from Ubuntu
[18:08] <sveinung> why?
[18:08] <andv> because you are releasing a software in debian
[18:08] <andv> so the package must be clean
[18:08] <sveinung> it's still permitted to keep the changelog entries
[18:08] <andv> yes, but why keeping them?
[18:09] <andv> who cares?
[18:09] <andv> sveinung, you do the package again
[18:09] <andv> for debian
[18:09] <sveinung> andv: for example the script that imports debian packages into bazaar
[18:10] <andv> ?
[18:10] <andv> we gonna sync it
[18:10] <andv> when it's in debian
[18:10] <andv> so you gonna drop all entries anyway
[18:10] <andv> (changelog entries)
[18:10] <andv> I guess you know that a package which gets synced in ubuntu
[18:11] <sveinung> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/DebianImportSpecification
[18:11] <andv> loses all changelog entries
[18:11] <sveinung> I meant this
[18:11] <andv> I don't get what your problem
[18:11] <andv> you do the package in debian
[18:11] <andv> we will upload it
[18:11] <sveinung> I also think it's nice to keep that sort of data
[18:12] <andv> which data?
[18:12] <sveinung> the changelog entries
[18:12] <andv> if all changes are integrated
[18:12] <andv> you don't have to report those entries again
[18:12] <andv> how the changelog will look like?
[18:13] <andv> changes appears under unstable (by emanuele gentili for istance)
[18:13] <andv> and they never touched unstable ground
[18:13] <andv> before
[18:14] <sveinung> don't know if I will be able to formulate myself good enough in English right now
[18:14] <sveinung> but I'll try
[18:14] <andv> please explain me what's the rationale to keep them
[18:14] <andv> and I'll try to understand you
[18:15] <sveinung> It's just nice to have those entries since you then have a bit more history for the package in a machine readable format
[18:15] <sveinung> so you later can do things to those data
[18:15] <andv> those data?
[18:16] <andv> you can make changes to 'those data' without having those changelog entries
[18:16] <andv> I assume you merged all ubuntu changes into the future debian package
[18:16] <sveinung> for example the Ubuntu Distributed Importer, when creating a branch from a package, will check if there are Ubuntu entries to see what will come first
[18:16] <andv> removing changelog entries does NOT mean you have to remove the changes reported in them
[18:16] <sveinung> I know
[18:17] <andv> so, I don't get why we need to have those entries then
[18:18] <sveinung> It's not for us but for programs reding it. So one for example can see that the package originated in Ubuntu ()but don't get me wrong, I'm not fanatical about this
[18:18] <andv> you won't use the autogenerated branch anyway
[18:18] <sveinung> I know
[18:18] <andv> you gonna keep usinh YOUR branch
[18:18] <sveinung> it was just an example
[18:18] <andv> if you really wanna keep all changes reported in those entries
[18:19] <andv> integrate everything in ONE entry
[18:19] <andv> so together with * Initial release. (Closes: #000000)
[18:19] <andv> you'll add
[18:19] <andv> * modified watch file
[18:19] <andv> * modified debian/foo
[18:19] <andv> or whatever
[18:19] <andv> I hope you've understood a bit
[18:20] <andv> what integrating old entries mean
[18:20] <andv> old entries integrated in a main one which will be the initial release
[18:21] <andv> sveinung, another problem
[18:21] <andv> if you wanna keep those entries
[18:21] <andv> you'll have to license the packaging side
[18:21] <andv> which is useless and time-loss work
[18:21] <andv> you usually license your package under the same license as upstream it is
[18:21] <sveinung> last time they said it was already licensed
[18:22] <sveinung> since it wasn't specified it was assumed it was the same as upstrem
[18:22] <sveinung> *upstrem
[18:22] <sveinung> *upstream
[18:22] <andv> sveinung, look at the changelog
[18:23] <andv> apart from asac changes which seem to be relevant
[18:23] <andv> (and your ones)
[18:23] <andv> do you see any other important change?
[18:23] <sveinung> the initial packaging?
[18:23] <andv>   * debian/control:
[18:23] <andv>    + added Homepage field.
[18:23] <andv>    + Update Standards-Version.
[18:23] <andv> for istance
[18:23] <andv> are not so important to be added on the next debian package you're making
[18:23] <andv> or not?
[18:23] <andv> nono, the current version
[18:23] <andv> we have on karmic
[18:24] <sveinung> andv: I'm sorry. My head don't work right now. I need food, and to eat I have to go home. Could we take this on email?
[18:24] <andv> it will take ages on email I guess
[18:24] <sveinung> (I could try to talk a bit more if email isn't OK for you)
[18:25] <andv> give me branch url
[18:25] <sveinung> thank you wery much!
[18:25] <sveinung> https://code.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.debian
[18:25] <sveinung> ooh, sorry
[18:25] <sveinung> misread
[18:26] <andv> can you tell me which debian-specific
[18:26] <andv> changes you did
[18:27] <sveinung> andv: the naming (no ubuntuX at the end)
[18:28] <sveinung> and putting myself as maintainer temporarily
[18:28] <andv> dependencies are now taken from xpi:depends
[18:28] <andv> I see
[18:28] <sveinung> the rest could apply to Ubuntu as well
[18:28] <andv> I gonna have my debian box ready soon
[18:28] <andv> so I can test it
[18:28] <sveinung> except the closes
[18:28] <sveinung> good
[18:28] <andv> I'll have to do some fixes
[18:28] <andv> to the packaging side
[18:29] <andv> then I have to check out lintian
[18:29] <andv> and other stuff
[18:29] <sveinung> one lintian warining will be fixed when mozilla-devscripts v 15 comes out
[18:30] <andv> sveinung, ok
[18:30] <sveinung> MOZ_XPI_DOCUMENTED_LICENSE_FILES is introduced in v 15
[18:30] <sveinung> should I commit and push the code that uses it?
[18:30] <andv> sveinung, so are you OK to cooperate with me maintaining this package?
[18:30] <sveinung> of course
[18:30] <andv> perfect
[18:30] <andv> you'll be the maintainer, I gonna add myself in the uploaders field as co-maintainer
[18:31] <sveinung> great
[18:31] <andv> so I've fixed asac a problem since he's busy doing his stuff
[18:31] <andv> do you own an itp bug already?
[18:31] <sveinung> yes
[18:31] <andv> ok perfect
[18:32] <andv> sveinung, is there a way I can work on your branch?
[18:32] <andv> actually just you is able to upload to that branch
[18:32] <sveinung> I know. It was just ment to be temporary
[18:32] <sveinung> feel free to change it
[18:33] <andv> is there a way to upload to a same branch?
[18:33] <sveinung> (the location)
[18:33] <andv> apart creating a new team
[18:33] <sveinung> I don't know
[18:34] <andv> I guess you can co-maintain a branch on teams only
[18:36] <sveinung> sorry, I don't undersatand
[18:36] <sveinung> *understand
[18:37] <andv> for co-maintaining a branch
[18:37] <andv> e.g both me and you can upload to it
[18:37] <andv> the only way is having a team
[18:37] <andv> I'll ask asac how can we do
[18:37] <sveinung> ok
[18:39] <andv> ok, going to prepare dinner
[18:39] <andv> be back later
[18:39] <sveinung> I'll to be back later
[19:39] <sveinung> andv: Now that I have gotten myself food and some fresh air I think I understand what you meant when we were talking about the changelog. Were you talking about doing the packaging again from scrach?
[19:40] <sveinung> As I said my head wasn't working 100% when I read it. I believed you talked about uploading the Ubuntu one.
[19:40] <sveinung> We can do it from scarch if you want to, and I agree that in that case we should drop the changelog entries.
[19:49] <andv> sveinung, yep
[19:49] <andv> that's what I meant
[19:50] <andv> sveinung, I have to go, be back in 3 hours if you are here
[19:50] <sveinung> sure
[19:50] <andv> see ya later
[19:50] <sveinung> And sorry about the misunderstanding. I had been on campus all day but since I forgot my money I hadn't eaten
[19:51] <sveinung> or taken breaks from the computer
[19:51] <BUGabundo> hi
[19:52] <pace_t_zulu> how's it BUGabundo?
[19:53] <BUGabundo> wit a dyeing PA
[20:03] <andv> sveinung, np
[20:04] <andv> sveinung, after we decide the branch location
[20:04] <andv> sveinung, we gonna start a brand new debian branch
[20:04] <andv> with a clean changelog
[20:04] <sveinung> k
[20:04] <andv> and with a working package for debian
[20:05] <andv> sveinung, do you have a box to test it too?
[20:05] <sveinung> yes
[20:05] <sveinung> I have lenny on my laptop
[20:05] <sveinung> og Squeeze on my stationary
[20:06] <sveinung> *and
[20:06] <andv> perfect
[20:06] <andv> build the package from the branch you linked me before
[20:06] <andv> install the package
[20:06] <andv> and test it on lenny
[20:07] <andv> * squeeze
[20:07] <andv> sorry
[20:07] <andv> not lenny
[20:07] <andv> test it on squeeze which is quite near to si
[20:07] <andv> * sid
[20:07] <andv> as build depends and so on
[20:07] <sveinung> sure
[20:07] <andv> and give me a feedback
[20:08] <andv> asac, do you know where we can host that branch?
[20:08] <andv> asac, do mozilla team have some space to host the all in one branch?
[20:10] <andv> sveinung, ok have to go
[20:10] <sveinung> andv: ok
[20:10] <andv> talk to you later and if asac gets back ask him about the branch thing
[20:11] <andv> asac, I've replied to your mail already
[20:11] <andv> ;)
[20:11] <andv> cya later
[20:11] <andv> and thanks for your work on this sveinung
[20:11] <sveinung> andv: thanks for co maintaining :)
[20:11] <andv> np
[20:11]  * andv off
[20:14] <fta> asac, could you please give me the branch urls, ppa names, etc, for the nm dailies so i can start it?
[21:18] <fta> asac, ... and the nickname you want.. nmd?
[22:08] <micahg> asac: are you around?
[22:09] <BUGabundo> he was , a few minutes agot
[23:11] <asac> fta: nmt?
[23:12] <BUGabundo> asac: still no reply from fta :)
[23:13] <asac> BUGabundo: he asked me something ... i answered ;)
[23:13] <andv> asac, did you read backlog?
[23:13] <andv> I've decided to co-maintain all in one sidebar with sveinung
[23:13] <andv> in debian
[23:13] <asac> andv: we usually use ~ubuntu-dev for extension
[23:13] <andv> problem is finding a place to host the branch
[23:14] <asac> and non -devs drive the branch by requesting merged that you can push or merge
[23:14] <asac> use ubuntu-dev ... thats the right place to put it
[23:14] <andv> are you sure?
[23:14] <fta> * Disconnected (Network is unreachable).
[23:14] <andv> it is meant for debian
[23:15] <asac> andv: it is ment for debian and then to be synched down afaik
[23:15] <andv> yep
[23:15] <asac> why have two branches?
[23:15] <fta> blank between 23:17 and 23:39
[23:15] <andv> you suggest to merge the existing one?
[23:15] <asac> andv: i have no clue about current status
[23:15] <andv> I added you as reviewer
[23:15] <andv> like 2 weeks ago
[23:15] <fta> asac, can you add the debian link please?
[23:15] <asac> andv: i think in a perfect world you have one branch that is for latest debian/ubuntu
[23:15] <asac> and when debian freezes you create a stable debian branch
[23:16] <andv> agreed
[23:16] <andv> I've sent you the review request
[23:16] <asac> andv: and if ubuntu freezes you crate a ubuntu stable branch
[23:16] <asac> etc.
[23:16] <asac> fta: i think that breaks stuff
[23:16] <andv> you have to accept it for the ubuntu-dev branch
[23:16] <andv> e.g sveinung merged it from his branch to ubuntu-dev one
[23:16] <fta> asac, ?
[23:16] <andv> but needs approval
[23:17] <asac> fta: the build bot cannot deal with debian only branches?
[23:17] <asac> hmm
[23:17] <asac> should have been obvious
[23:17] <bdrung_> asac: can you add a comment to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BenjaminDrung/MOTUApplication ?
[23:17] <asac> bdrung_: i was going to ... when does that need to happen?
[23:18] <fta> asac, some parts of the bot expect debian/changelog, or debian/control
[23:18] <bdrung_> asac: application is on 27th August
[23:19] <bdrung_> so there is enough time
[23:19] <fta> asac, i call dch somewhere
[23:19] <asac> fta: yeah ... dch -c changelog is what we use
[23:19] <asac> but let me check
[23:20] <asac> i think i should give up on debian only then
[23:21] <andv> asac, do you suggest to merge the existing ubuntu branch or to create a new one?
[23:22] <andv> asac, if you wanna keep the old one, just have a look here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/+merge/8652
[23:26] <asac> fta: ok moved all files to debian/ dir
[23:26] <asac> on applet and nm branch
[23:26] <fta> thanks
[23:26] <fta> asac, do you want/need chained deps?
[23:27] <fta> build-deps
[23:27] <asac> fta: for now i dont think we need it
[23:27] <asac> fta: if we need it ill let you know
[23:27] <asac> api moves slowely
[23:27] <fta> ok
[23:28] <asac> andv: ok checking the all-in-one branch
[23:28] <andv> asac, perfect thanks
[23:28] <andv> asac, if accepted I gonna move tomorrow to fix some stuff
[23:28] <fta> asac, you said "nmt", why t? i used nmd, but i can change
[23:28] <andv> then it will be ready
[23:29] <BUGabundo> fta: "(11:27:04 PM) cabrey: Native !chromium 64 being developed? http://is.gd/2lFfR !linux"
[23:29] <fta> BUGabundo, i don't need that, i already have the package ready
[23:30] <BUGabundo> I know
[23:30] <fta> i just don't want to break too many people so i'm waiting for it to be a little bit more usable
[23:30] <BUGabundo> that's what I told him
[23:30] <BUGabundo> btw, when will it it the PPA?
[23:32] <asac> fta: because we used nmt before for that repo
[23:32] <fta> asac, ok
[23:32] <asac> for me its Network-Manager Trunk -> ~network-manager/+archive/trunk
[23:32] <asac> andv: i am not so sure about the changelog addition of the 1.4.7-0ubuntu2
[23:32] <asac> are we sure we also have the changes done in that release?
[23:33] <BUGabundo> fta: FF3.7 started to stuck on FullScreen today
[23:33] <asac> hmm
[23:33] <andv> asac, the change was about adding a watch file plus adding homepage field on control?
[23:33] <asac> andv: ok seems ok
[23:33] <asac> andv: yes. but where did he merge it from?
[23:33] <andv> from the archive
[23:33] <asac> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kvilhaugsvik/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu/revision/25
[23:33] <asac> was there a contributor?
[23:33] <andv> yes
[23:33] <andv> a contributor added those
[23:33] <andv> without asking here
[23:34] <andv> but as I already said to sveinung
[23:34] <asac> no what i mean ... that commit is a [merge] so he must have merged it from somewhere
[23:34] <andv> the changelog will be cleaned
[23:34] <asac> but i am not sure where it came from
[23:34] <andv> so all those entries will be removed
[23:34] <andv> in debian
[23:34] <asac> andv: why will the changelog be cleaned?
[23:34] <asac> andv: thats not right.
[23:34] <asac> if you share them you keep them
[23:35] <andv> he integrated all changes
[23:35] <andv> so why adding all those entries?
[23:35] <asac> why not
[23:35] <andv> anyway he merged those changes from the package on archive
[23:35] <asac> its the same history
[23:35] <asac> no sense in keeping two branches
[23:35] <andv> a contributor uploaded that revision
[23:35] <andv> sveinung didnt notice it but I did
[23:35] <andv> and he added it
[23:35] <andv> together with the changes
[23:36] <andv> so it's not a real merge
[23:36] <andv> but just adding back lost changes
[23:36] <asac> i am not talking abouta real merge
[23:36] <asac> i am talking about a bzr merge
[23:36] <asac> its a _merge_ and i wonder where it comes from
[23:36] <asac> but doesnt matter. its ok
[23:36] <sveinung> asac: I did a bzr merge to add the missing revision
[23:36] <andv> how do you know it's a merge??
[23:37] <andv> sveinung, where did you take that?
[23:37] <andv> do that contributor have a branch somewhere?
[23:37] <sveinung> I branched from the version before
[23:37] <sveinung> then added the revision
[23:37] <sveinung> then merged it into the current revision
[23:37] <andv> you got it from the autogenerated branch right?
[23:37] <fta> asac, done
[23:38] <andv> I mean when you upload a package it gets synced as a branch
[23:38] <andv> coz I don't think that contributor opened a branch itself
[23:38] <andv> for all in one sidebar
[23:38] <sveinung> no, those are different trees
[23:38] <andv> I still don't get where you branched it
[23:38] <andv> from
[23:38] <andv> but anyway it doesnt matter
[23:39] <asac> sveinung: you did the right thing. really great. thanks
[23:39] <asac> i approved that merge. in future just use distinct topic names for oyur branches and not the same name as the ~uubuntu-dev branc hname
[23:39] <asac> i gave an example in the comment
[23:39] <asac> thanks
[23:40] <andv> asac, I gonna maintain it together with sveinung in debian
[23:40] <andv> if you are satisfied with it
[23:40] <sveinung> asac: sure, I'll remember that
[23:41] <asac> andv: i dont think there are two maintainers needed for an extension ;)
[23:41] <asac> just add yourself as an uploaders: and you can help sponsoring that stuff
[23:41] <andv> asac, yep
[23:41] <andv> that's what i wanted
[23:41] <andv> asac, I've answered to your mail
[23:42] <asac> sveinung: consider to use a .bzr-builddeb/default.conf for the next revision
[23:42] <asac> andv knows what it does
[23:42] <andv> yep gonna take care of it
[23:42] <andv> np
[23:43] <asac> andv: i added it now in the merge
[23:44] <asac> so it will be o n~ubnutu-dev
[23:44] <andv> great
[23:45] <andv> asac, I'll keep all changelog entries then
[23:45] <andv> didnt want to
[23:45] <andv> but I trust the way you wanna do it
[23:46] <asac> ok i pushed it ... you seem to have uploaded to archive without pushing a merge?
[23:46] <asac> thats bad practice
[23:46] <asac> you cannot upload something you didnt push ... or that is waiting another review
[23:46] <asac> anyway. i hope it was now really the same that is now on the branch
[23:46] <andv> ?
[23:46] <asac> andv: the version i just merged is already in karmic
[23:46] <andv> I took the uploaded package from the branch you merged right now
[23:47] <asac> andv: yes. but it might be different
[23:47] <andv> I hadnt access to that branch anyway
[23:47] <asac> never upload anything before it lands on the release branch
[23:47] <asac> andv: you had
[23:47] <asac> thats the whole point of having it in ~ubuntu-dev
[23:47] <fta> asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30433198/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.modemmanager_0.2.git.20090817t181641.ca767e4-0ubuntu1~nmt1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[23:47] <asac> so that anyone who can upload can also push
[23:47] <andv> asac, you merged it right now
[23:47] <andv> so how could it be on ubuntu-dev two weeks ago?
[23:48] <andv> the updated version
[23:48] <andv> I mean
[23:48] <asac> hmm
[23:48] <asac> andv: either you dont upload or you push it there
[23:48] <asac> fta: thats interesting. wonder if that has something to do with the debian dir movage
[23:49] <asac> andv: anyway ok for now.
[23:49] <andv> asac, I gonna fix some stuff
[23:50] <andv> and then it's ready for debian
[23:50] <fta> asac, no, all karmic are red, jaunty is green (so far)
[23:50] <andv> then I'll test it on my debian box
[23:50] <andv> together with sveinung
[23:52] <andv> sveinung, you there?
[23:52] <andv> sveinung, we gonna keep just one branch
[23:53] <sveinung> andv: yes, I'm here
[23:53] <andv> sveinung, so please re-add all changes you did on the ubuntu-dev branch
[23:53] <andv> sveinung, you made a .debian branch before with some changes
[23:53] <andv> please merge them into the ubuntu-dev
[23:53] <andv> branch
[23:53] <sveinung> it's still on launchpad
[23:54] <andv> asac, but having it on ubuntu-dev will make sveinung unable to push to it
[23:55] <andv> sveinung, do something nice
[23:55] <andv> sveinung, apply the .debian changes
[23:55] <andv> to the .ubuntu branch
[23:55] <andv> then ask a merge again
[23:55] <andv> and add me as reviewer
[23:56] <andv> then remove the .debian branch
[23:56] <andv> it will be useless at that point
[23:56] <andv> asac, but having it on ubuntu-dev will make sveinung unable to push to it
[23:56] <andv> * asac_
[23:56] <sveinung> andv: sure
[23:56] <andv> sveinung, let me know when done
[23:57] <andv> so I review / accept the changes
[23:57] <andv> so the package can be ready for tomorrow
[23:58] <fta> asac, weird https://edge.launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive/trunk