| bazhang | windows-rules seems to be sergiumihai from -ru | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | In ubottu, Epsis said: gazebo is Are there girls in there? Cuz if there are i wanna do 'em! | 00:35 |
| Pici | .... | 00:37 |
| Flannel | He's going to cast magic missile at the darkness... and then get banned! | 01:35 |
| Coringao | Hi | 04:40 |
| Coringao | I would like to create a bot to my channel #ubuntugames | 04:41 |
| Coringao | could you help me? | 04:42 |
| Coringao | Pici, ? | 04:43 |
| Coringao | Amaranth, I would like to create a bot to my channel #ubuntugames | 04:44 |
| Coringao | could you help me? | 04:44 |
| maco | bazhang: what happened with MadGirl? | 05:37 |
| bazhang | maco, a bot | 05:37 |
| maco | oh | 05:39 |
| bazhang | mike_144 is not making sense. | 05:41 |
| Valkyrie | e.o | 06:19 |
| Valkyrie | Hey.. | 06:19 |
| Valkyrie | I just wanted to say sorry. | 06:19 |
| Valkyrie | I feel lik a total dick for what i did a week ago | 06:19 |
| Valkyrie | it doesent help the buisness of ubunut, for new comers to walk in and see ubuntu getting spam dah hell out of | 06:19 |
| bazhang | Valkyrie, you had a bot attack in #ubuntu ? here is the place to discuss | 06:29 |
| bazhang | #ubuntu: 2009-08-13T05:20:36 <valkyrie> Ubuntu got pwnd? | 06:30 |
| Myrtti | this is the bot spammer? | 06:30 |
| bazhang | yep | 06:30 |
| * Myrtti walks away | 06:30 | |
| Valkyrie | e.o | 06:33 |
| Valkyrie | I just wanted to say sorry man. | 06:33 |
| bazhang | Valkyrie, dont do that in #kubuntu | 06:34 |
| Valkyrie | Yea, | 06:34 |
| Valkyrie | K | 06:34 |
| Valkyrie | i just wanted to say sorry | 06:35 |
| Valkyrie | I feel bad | 06:35 |
| * Valkyrie shrugs | 06:35 | |
| Valkyrie | i dont care if im unbnned | 06:35 |
| Valkyrie | I was a total dick, Having bots is a privelage, and not to be trifled with | 06:35 |
| Myrtti | a bit strange you didn't figure that out before you ran them | 06:36 |
| * Valkyrie chuckles lightly | 06:36 | |
| Valkyrie | Ya.. | 06:36 |
| Valkyrie | And i only ran one of them btw.. | 06:36 |
| bazhang | its not funny Valkyrie | 06:36 |
| Valkyrie | i know its not | 06:36 |
| Valkyrie | Again, it hurts buisness | 06:36 |
| Valkyrie | and i feel like a dick for doing it in the first place | 06:36 |
| Myrtti | I need to go lie down, not feeling too peachy. brb | 06:37 |
| * Valkyrie Sighs | 06:40 | |
| Valkyrie | Do you guys atleast accept my apolagies? | 06:40 |
| bazhang | Valkyrie, was there anything else you wished to discuss? | 06:46 |
| Valkyrie | Yes. | 06:46 |
| Valkyrie | accepting my apolagy for trollin tha hell outa you guys? :'D | 06:46 |
| bazhang | Valkyrie, it seems to be a less than sincere one, as you are laughing about it. If there is nothing else, please dont idle in this channel as per the topic. | 06:47 |
| Valkyrie | Who said i was laughing? | 06:47 |
| maco | Valkyrie: [01:36:10] -*- Valkyrie chuckles lightly | 06:49 |
| maco | or should that be taken as "nervous laughter" | 06:49 |
| * Valkyrie Shrugs | 06:50 | |
| Valkyrie | I chuckles | 06:50 |
| Valkyrie | Chuckled* | 06:50 |
| Valkyrie | Cause that person said i shoulda figured it out before | 06:50 |
| Valkyrie | Could be taken as nervous laughter? | 06:50 |
| bazhang | Valkyrie, noted. please part the channel. | 06:51 |
| ikonia | does anyone know why chanserv re-banned bacta yesterday ? | 07:08 |
| elky | from where? | 07:27 |
| tsimpson | -ot, it looks like a server sync issue: 2009-08-16T11:49:53 *** irc.freenode.net sets mode: +b bacta!*@* | 07:28 |
| elky | well leave it until he notices. | 07:29 |
| bazhang | really luis_ has had 3 warnings on language and keeps at it | 07:31 |
| maco | aye | 07:40 |
| maco | i already pointed out that he's talking to two ops too | 07:40 |
| bazhang | I'm just a helper in there. | 07:41 |
| maco | he thinks mashing shift and numerical keys gets around it | 07:41 |
| maco | hey i didnt know i was an op in there til jussi01 told me a couple days ago | 07:41 |
| maco | like "youre a #kubuntu op right?" "no" "yes you are" | 07:41 |
| bazhang | hehe | 07:41 |
| * jussi01 bites maco :D | 07:42 | |
| bazhang | full out vetting I can see :) | 07:42 |
| * jussi01 bites bazhang | 07:45 | |
| bazhang | yeowch! | 07:45 |
| maco | vetting? | 07:45 |
| bazhang | ready? yep! go! | 07:46 |
| bazhang | kind of like I got for #ubuntu | 07:46 |
| bazhang | quick PM from LjL and boom | 07:46 |
| maco | he copied and pasted something showing id been made an op there a bit ago | 07:48 |
| bazhang | haha | 07:48 |
| maco | it said last edited 2 weeks ago, so apparently i was an op in there for two weeks and didnt know? | 07:49 |
| bazhang | wonder if the !factoid trigger for #kubuntu has you in it | 07:51 |
| bazhang | nope | 07:52 |
| jussi01 | bazhang: you could fix that... | 07:55 |
| bazhang | fixed | 07:57 |
| jussi01 | bazhang: now you are sure you didnt break it? | 07:59 |
| jussi01 | (ie. have you looked on the bans db?) | 07:59 |
| bazhang | jussi01, not sure what you mean ? there are some folks on that list I have never seen, and some that are clearly no longer active (ie LjL ) | 08:00 |
| jussi01 | bazhang: we have had people try change ops factoids and screw them up. hence my asking you to check that it doesnt say something stupid | 08:01 |
| bazhang | jussi01, I checked in PM with ubottu, via ops-#kubuntu | 08:03 |
| jussi01 | aye, that works also. :) | 08:03 |
| Flannel | Er, how would changing the factoid affect the bantracker? | 08:03 |
| jussi01 | Flannel: it doesnt? | 08:03 |
| jussi01 | I meant the factoid db... meh | 08:03 |
| bazhang | hehe | 08:03 |
| jussi01 | same website.. | 08:04 |
| tsimpson | it looks ok to me | 08:04 |
| bazhang | apokryphos fdoving Hawkwind trappist LjL dont know | 08:05 |
| tsimpson | almost anyway (2 or's) /me fixes | 08:05 |
| bazhang | well apart from LjL | 08:06 |
| bazhang | trappist I see in the channel, the rest offline apparently | 08:08 |
| tsimpson | I haven't seen Hawkwind in a long time, and they don't appear to be on the access list anyway | 08:09 |
| jussi01 | and isnt apokrohpys the orginal channel founder? | 08:09 |
| tsimpson | that was haggi wasn't it | 08:10 |
| * jussi01 gets confuzzled | 08:10 | |
| tsimpson | he has +votsriRfA though | 08:11 |
| tsimpson | apokryphos is active in #k-devel, not so muck in #k | 08:15 |
| tsimpson | haven't seen fdoving in a while either | 08:18 |
| jussi01 | me either | 08:19 |
| tsimpson | I removed fdoving, apokryphos, Hawkwind, LjL, haggai and fooishbar from the trigger | 08:23 |
| mac_v | any ops around , could some one add this to the bots> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule | 09:22 |
| jussi01 | mac_v: is it an update to a factoid? or a new one? | 09:29 |
| mac_v | new factoid | 09:29 |
| jussi01 | mac_v: you can suggest factoids by simply saying !factoidname is <reply>bar | 09:30 |
| elky | it should just be tacked on to !karmic | 09:30 |
| mac_v | hmm.. never tried it , | 09:30 |
| mac_v | !releaseSchedule <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule> | 09:31 |
| ubottu | Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 09:31 |
| mac_v | !releaseSchedule is <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule> | 09:31 |
| ubottu | Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 09:31 |
| jussi01 | mac_v: no !foo is <reply> bar | 09:31 |
| mac_v | oh | 09:31 |
| mac_v | !KarmicSchedule is <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule> bar | 09:32 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu-ops, mac_v said: !KarmicSchedule is <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule> bar | 09:32 |
| mac_v | jussi01: \o/ , can anyone do that ? | 09:32 |
| jussi01 | mac_v: that doesnt add it, just sends it here, but yes, all can do that | 09:33 |
| mac_v | oh , sending it here.. hmm, so now is it added or now its at the ops discretions? | 09:34 |
| jussi01 | no, its at the ops discretion | 09:36 |
| mac_v | jussi01: i'm going to try it again just once, from ubuntu+1 just to see how it works | 09:37 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu+1, mac_v said: !KarmicSchedule is <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule> bar | 09:37 |
| jussi01 | mac_v: and you still have it slightly wrong | 09:37 |
| mac_v | hmmm nice... ok, ops can decide it later | 09:37 |
| tsimpson | mac_v: <reply> is exactly "<reply>", not the actual reply | 09:37 |
| jussi01 | you need the <reply> bit | 09:37 |
| mac_v | oh! face palm | 09:38 |
| jussi01 | change the bar for the actual reply | 09:38 |
| tsimpson | eg !KarmicSchedule is <reply> this is the schedule... | 09:38 |
| tsimpson | <reply> makes the bot change the reply from "<factoid name> is <the reply>" to "<the reply>" | 09:39 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu+1, mac_v said: !KarmicSchedule is <reply> The Release Schedule for Karmic is : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule | 09:40 |
| tsimpson | erm | 09:40 |
| tsimpson | !schedule-#ubuntu+1 | 09:40 |
| ubottu | A schedule of Karmic Koala (9.10) release milestones can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule | 09:40 |
| tsimpson | it's already there | 09:40 |
| mac_v | hm... it didnt work earlier yesterday! or maybe we were all trying the wrong spelling | 09:41 |
| mac_v | oh we just tried "schedule" | 09:42 |
| tsimpson | it's a channel-specific factoid, for #ubuntu+1 | 09:42 |
| tsimpson | the bot translates !schedule to !schedule-#ubuntu+1 when called from that channel | 09:43 |
| mac_v | tsimpson: oh , ok , thanx, something we must have spelled wrong i guess | 09:45 |
| mac_v | thanx guys , bye | 09:46 |
| tsimpson | the only thing I see from +1 logs is "!gnome schedule", oh well | 09:49 |
| Myrtti | !away > richardcavellafk | 11:30 |
| bazhang | <indus> norpan111: i have made a ppa full of bad code on launchpad for users to try | 13:50 |
| ikonia | bazhang: verify that if possible | 14:08 |
| ikonia | bazhang: if it is - we need to get it pulled | 14:08 |
| bazhang | he is joining | 14:14 |
| indus | hi | 14:15 |
| bazhang | indus, this was a joke? | 14:15 |
| indus | yes | 14:15 |
| bazhang | <indus> norpan111: i have made a ppa full of bad code on launchpad for users to try | 14:15 |
| indus | well, its obvious i didnt mean that | 14:15 |
| indus | you think ill advertise it like that if u made it? | 14:15 |
| bazhang | apart from it not being funny, #ubuntu is not the joke channel. | 14:16 |
| indus | i was suggesting, its possible for people to make such a ppa no? | 14:16 |
| ikonia | well the key thing is that it's not real, so no harm is done | 14:16 |
| bazhang | please never repeat this again. and keep jokes to offtopic channel indus | 14:16 |
| indus | well, ok just want to clarify 100 % , ikonia and bazhang this is possible yes? | 14:16 |
| ikonia | indus: PPA's are a bit of a funny subject as there are some bad ones out there, so it may be best to not suggest you've made a bad one | 14:16 |
| indus | ok | 14:17 |
| ikonia | yes, some PPA's do have bad / early development applicatios in them | 14:17 |
| ikonia | hence why it's not the best move to suggest you've made one yourself | 14:17 |
| bazhang | full of malicious code no less | 14:17 |
| indus | can i suggest , we always warn about security risks of ppa in #ubuntu | 14:17 |
| indus | ? | 14:17 |
| indus | bazhang: iam sorry | 14:17 |
| ikonia | indus: when PPA's are suggested, it's always a good idea to point out they can't really be supported | 14:18 |
| indus | ok | 14:18 |
| indus | what about developer ppas? | 14:19 |
| ikonia | still unsupported | 14:19 |
| ikonia | unless you are "the" developer, in whcih case you're responsible for it | 14:19 |
| indus | for example, many in karmic are suggesting using ppa's (in forums i mean) | 14:19 |
| ikonia | karmics not even out yet, so that's a stupid suggestion | 14:19 |
| indus | i prefer waiting for the repos | 14:19 |
| ikonia | unless it's discussing brining a PPA release into main | 14:19 |
| indus | k | 14:19 |
| indus | ok can i leave now? | 14:20 |
| ikonia | just be mindful of the people you are talking to, it's easy to believe that you have a PPA full of bad code, and it doesn't paint you or the PPA projects in a good light | 14:20 |
| indus | hmm true | 14:20 |
| ikonia | indus: you can leave when you want, it's just a a request | 14:20 |
| bazhang | thanks for joining | 14:20 |
| indus | intention was not /or never to malign ppa's | 14:21 |
| ikonia | of course not | 14:21 |
| indus | ok thanks bye and good day :) | 14:21 |
| ikonia | thanks bazhang | 14:21 |
| ikonia | he's a bit wild at times with his comments and attitude so it's best to knock it on the head now | 14:21 |
| bazhang | ikonia, I'm glad he was more open to discussion this time | 14:21 |
| === v is now known as vorian | ||
| popey | 14:19:21 < indus> for example, many in karmic are suggesting using ppa's (in forums i mean) | 15:17 |
| popey | not really | 15:17 |
| popey | 14:19:35 <+ikonia> karmics not even out yet, so that's a stupid suggestion | 15:17 |
| popey | some developers put code in their ppa before it hits karmic, so people can test wild stuff | 15:17 |
| popey | iirc bryce does this with xorg stuff | 15:17 |
| ikonia | as I said, unless being considered for inclusion | 15:18 |
| elky | and it's not really something that should be suggested to people who are by all considerations, newbies. | 15:22 |
| popey | missed that ikonia sorry | 15:26 |
| popey | ppas are not for newbies? | 15:27 |
| ikonia | I don't think they are for new users personally due to the lack of support | 15:34 |
| ikonia | I suppose it depends on what the quality of the content is | 15:35 |
| maco | the kubuntu backports ppa is advertised in #kubuntu | 15:44 |
| maco | (in the topic) | 15:45 |
| ikonia | I know - I really dislike that | 15:45 |
| ikonia | apparantly it's because it's too much hassle to get stuff into main | 15:45 |
| maco | i thought it was to let the users choose betwen 4.2 or 4.3 without having to also worry about the instability of karmic | 15:45 |
| elky | that reasoning is a cross between facepalm and headdesk. | 15:45 |
| elky | maco, regardless of why they're using a ppa for backports, how do you ensure that to a newbie who is unable to discern the quality of ppas, does not misunderstand what ppas are, and go on a ppa binge? | 15:49 |
| jpds | ikonia: s/main/backports/ | 15:50 |
| * genii sips and thinks about PPA binges | 15:50 | |
| Daviey | This is the users choice. Whilst i agree that using PPA's from untrusted sources is bad, it's up to the user to choose what software packages they trust. | 15:51 |
| maco | elky: fair enough on the potential for misunderstanding | 15:51 |
| elky | Daviey, is it the user's choice if they do not have the experience to know what it is they're 'choosing'? | 15:51 |
| Daviey | yes. | 15:52 |
| elky | i'll remember that if i ever get to get your signature on something. I'm glad to know you won't care about the small print. | 15:52 |
| Daviey | i'm not sure that is what i said. | 15:53 |
| elky | personally, i'm not a huge fan of 'choosing' things that i have not been fully educated on. When I do choose something risky unknowingly, i inevitably feel ripped off, abused, exploited... | 15:54 |
| Daviey | If you compare the situation with other operating systems, rh *usually* (IME) has third party repos somewhere along the line. Windows *usually* has applications installed from unverified locations. I'm sorry if that makes you feel abused, but this is rapidly going away from the terms of reference that should be discussed IMO. | 15:56 |
| maco | i think is why there's an area to explain your ppa on launchpad | 15:57 |
| maco | "WARNING: this ppa contains software for testing" versus "we're core-devs and thought you'd like to try some new stuff" | 15:57 |
| genii | "this is just stuff I'm experimenting with" | 15:58 |
| Daviey | On one of my PPA's i have: | 15:59 |
| Daviey | *********************************************** | 15:59 |
| Daviey | * Not complete or ready for public consumption.. * | 15:59 |
| Daviey | *********************************************** | 15:59 |
| Daviey | It is unfortunate that this is users control, and i agree there should be more warnings.. But the argument that it is a PPA and therefore inherently bad, is not a good stance IMO. | 16:00 |
| jpds | Daviey: Yeah, well, doesn't mean they won't consume it in private. | 16:02 |
| Daviey | sure, and that is a choice. | 16:02 |
| ikonia | I think PPA's a great thing, I just don't think we should be pushing them as s solution, | 16:14 |
| ikonia | it's impossible to support them and the ammount of "I pulled it from a PPA and now X doesn't work" in #ubuntu is a reasonable level, mostly not because the package is broke, but because it pulls down deps that upgrade some core components | 16:14 |
| popey | I'd be interested to know what the solution to Intel graphics driver sucking in Jaunty is that _doesnt_ involve a ppa | 16:14 |
| elky | popey, something like the intel idiocy furthering the ppa habit does not make it any less a bad habit, really. | 16:16 |
| ikonia | popey: that is a core issue, that should be solved in main | 16:16 |
| popey | ikonia: it isnt | 16:16 |
| ikonia | popey: I'm tired of this "next release fix" | 16:16 |
| ikonia | popey: expand on that please ? | 16:16 |
| popey | install ubuntu 8.10 on a machine that has intel GMA type video hardware and you _will_ experience the most appalling video performance since warty | 16:17 |
| ikonia | popey: I'm on it now | 16:17 |
| popey | er, 9.04 | 16:17 |
| ikonia | I'm on 8.10 with an intel card | 16:17 |
| popey | sorry, silly me :) | 16:17 |
| ikonia | popey: yes, I agree, 9.04 sucks | 16:17 |
| elky | he's aware of the issue, popey. he responds to the issue several times a day in #ubuntu. | 16:17 |
| popey | and all the proposed 'solutions' 'workarounds' or whatever you want to call them.. | 16:17 |
| popey | ok, I'll stop talking then elky | 16:18 |
| popey | you asked ikonia | 16:18 |
| ikonia | no no | 16:18 |
| ikonia | please continue | 16:18 |
| ikonia | I may have miss-understood your commnet on the intel card | 16:18 |
| ikonia | ok........ | 16:18 |
| elky | ragequit? how mature... | 16:18 |
| Daviey | elky: throwing insults, how immature | 16:22 |
| Daviey | If he is upset, then it's better he removes himself from the situation, no? | 16:22 |
| Daviey | And saying things like "ragequit? how mature..." REALLY is not constructive, is it? | 16:22 |
| elky | one can remove themselves from a situation without being verbose about it. quitting a channel is verbose. | 16:25 |
| elky | what is the point of being verbose? | 16:25 |
| Daviey | commenting on it makes it further verbose, making the situation worse. | 16:27 |
| Daviey | Would it not have been better just to no comment? | 16:27 |
| Daviey | can you do that elky? | 16:27 |
| elky | is that a rhetoric, or just being patronising? | 16:27 |
| maco | TIMEOUT | 16:28 |
| * maco hands out cookies | 16:28 | |
| maco | eat the cookies, then you can call time in, once you're all sweetened up | 16:28 |
| * Daviey removes himself from the situation. | 16:28 | |
| * mneptok does the Dance Of The Sugar-Plum Fairies | 16:57 | |
| maco | mneptok: have you heard The Vandals' rendition? | 17:01 |
| mneptok | maco: no, for i am a beautiful and delicate snowflake. | 17:01 |
| maco | punk version of Dance of the Sugarplum Fairies | 17:02 |
| maco | win! | 17:02 |
| mneptok | BEUATIFUL AND DELICATE SNOWFLAKE LALALALALALALALA! | 17:03 |
| Mike_lifeguard | What's the process for updating ubottu's factoids? | 17:07 |
| bazhang | Mike_lifeguard, you make a suggestion and if approved it is added | 17:08 |
| Pici | !usage | 17:08 |
| ubottu | Hi! I'm #ubuntu-ops's favorite infobot, you can search my brain yourself at http://ubottu.com/factoids.cgi - Usage info: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBots | 17:08 |
| Pici | Second link has the syntax to make factoid suggestions | 17:09 |
| * elky cranks up the hairdryer and looks menacingly at mneptok. | 17:09 | |
| Mike_lifeguard | Sorry, I've already done that & the factoid hasn't been changed | 17:09 |
| Mike_lifeguard | If there's a specific problem with the proposed change, it'd be nice to know so I can submit something better | 17:09 |
| elky | Mike_lifeguard, chances are it just slipped through without being noticed. try again now and we'll look at it. | 17:10 |
| Pici | Mike_lifeguard: Unfortunately we don't have a method currently to keep track of pending suggestions, so yes, listen to elky | 17:10 |
| Mike_lifeguard | hm, that should be fixed :) | 17:11 |
| ikonia | an hours gone by and no suggestion from mike_lifeguard | 19:01 |
| Seeker` | I know, I was waiting for that | 19:03 |
| ikonia | probably talking nonsense then | 19:04 |
| Pici | No, he was talking about a factoid in #ubuntu before he came in here. | 19:04 |
| ikonia | yet he's not submitted anything while he knew we where watching | 19:05 |
| Pici | how pleasant. | 19:33 |
| Pici | That was certainly colorful. | 19:34 |
| maco | ferrillz | 19:35 |
| maco | he's in #ubuntu | 19:35 |
| Pici | he was just in -offtopic too | 19:49 |
| genii | I guess we'll never know now which one he would have wanted changed | 19:52 |
| Pici | it was !xorg, he didn't like that it suggested ?dm | 19:52 |
| genii | !xorg | 19:52 |
| ubottu | The X Window System is the part of your system that's responsible for graphical output. To restart your X, type « sudo /etc/init.d/?dm restart » in a console - To fix screen resolution or other X problems: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Config/Resolution | 19:52 |
| genii | Well, ?dm makes it desktop-agnostic | 19:53 |
| Pici | Agreed | 19:53 |
| Flannel | As long as you understand it's a wildcard and not a literal "?" | 19:53 |
| Flannel | but I don't think there's a better solution | 19:54 |
| genii | To have the same factoid with a one-letter change for 2 channels (at least #u and #k) doesn't make sense | 19:54 |
| Flannel | Well, even separating it by channels won't be sufficient, if you're using Ubuntu and kdm or whatnot. | 19:56 |
| Flannel | (because you installed kubuntu and let it do the default take-over, etc) | 19:56 |
| genii | Hm | 20:02 |
| ubottu | prince_jammys called the ops in #ubuntu (liquid) | 20:55 |
| maco | ikonia: i missed the line about him translating so i thought he was hitting on you | 20:59 |
| ikonia | ahh it's fine | 20:59 |
| ikonia | he's only human ;) | 20:59 |
| maco | i was like "huh? why's ikonia ok with being hit on? *scroll* Oooo translating what the other one said" | 20:59 |
| ikonia | hey what do you mean "why" !!! | 21:00 |
| maco | not "why is ikonia being hit on" | 21:00 |
| maco | but rather "why is ikonia ok with it" | 21:00 |
| ikonia | ;) | 21:00 |
| jussi01 | hahah | 21:03 |
| jussi01 | ahh, no one would hit on ikonia... :P | 21:04 |
| ikonia | troll in #centos #gentoo | 21:04 |
| mneptok | i banned him earlier in #maria | 21:07 |
| ikonia | in #maria ??? what is that | 21:07 |
| mneptok | look out for [Vendetta], too | 21:07 |
| mneptok | ikonia: oddly enough, it's the official channel of the Maria project | 21:08 |
| mneptok | bizarre naming, i know ... | 21:08 |
| jussi01 | rofl | 21:08 |
| jussi01 | wth is maria? | 21:08 |
| ikonia | she's about to be toast | 21:09 |
| ikonia | she's hitting #rhel/#fedora/#centos/#gentoo/us with this crap | 21:09 |
| mneptok | jussi01: http://askmonty.org | 21:09 |
| maco | who what huh? | 21:13 |
| maco | <-- articulate | 21:13 |
| ikonia | MariaKeys: | 21:13 |
| maco | ohok | 21:15 |
| jussi01 | mneptok: ahh, ok then | 21:15 |
| === maco is now known as MsMaco | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!