/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/19/#launchpad-meeting.txt

=== Ursinha-nom is now known as Ursinha
=== cprov is now known as cprov-zzz
=== salgado-afk is now known as salgado
barry#startmeeting15:00
MootBotMeeting started at 09:00. The chair is barry.15:00
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]15:00
barrywelcome to this week's ameu reviewer's meeting.  who's here today?15:00
BjornTme15:00
EdwinGrubbsme15:00
bacme15:00
barryderyck sends his apologies15:00
salgadome15:01
abentleyme15:01
adeuringme15:01
intellectronicame15:01
sinzuime15:02
barryjtv: ping15:02
flacosteme15:02
jtvme15:02
barryleonardr: ping15:02
jtvbarry: thanks :)15:02
barry:)15:02
bigjoolsme15:02
barrycprov, gary_poster, gmb, noodles775 ping15:02
noodles775me15:03
gary_posterme, sorry15:03
cprovme15:03
leonardrme15:03
gmbbarry: OTP at the moment; apologies are on the schedule.15:03
gary_poster:-)15:03
* barry reloads the page15:03
gary_posterlol15:03
barrygmb: are you sure you committed your draft? :)15:03
barrydanilos, allenap, rockstar ping15:04
danilosme15:04
allenapme15:04
barry[TOPIC] agenda15:05
MootBotNew Topic:  agenda15:05
barry * Roll call15:05
barry * Action items15:05
barry * Mentoring update15:05
barry * Peanut gallery (anything not on the agenda)15:05
barry 15:05
barry[TOPIC] action items15:06
MootBotNew Topic:  action items15:06
barry * intellectronica to report on relevant summary of ui reviewers meeting here15:06
barryintellectronica: tell us some good news!15:06
intellectronicai think there has been some kind of misunderstanding15:07
intellectronicathere aren't really any ui reviewers meetings15:07
barryintellectronica: ui phone call maybe?15:07
intellectronicai suppose the most interesting thing i can tell you is that martin is planning on beefing up the guidelines and in particular, start collecting case reports for interesting branches that went through ui review15:08
intellectronicaso if you're working on a ui branch from either side and think the process was interesting and other can learn from it, consider compiling a case report15:08
beunoyes15:09
intellectronicaoh, we should have talked about a million dollars15:09
barry:)15:09
barrybeuno: intellectronica was giving us a summary of the ui call15:09
barry<intellectronica> i suppose the most interesting thing i can tell you is that15:09
barry                 martin is planning on beefing up the guidelines and in15:09
barry                 particular, start collecting case reports for interesting15:09
barry                 branches that went through ui review  [10:08]15:09
barry<intellectronica> so if you're working on a ui branch from either side and15:10
barry                 think the process was interesting and other can learn from15:10
barry                 it, consider compiling a case report15:10
barry 15:10
barryintellectronica: thanks; beuno do you have anything you want to add?15:10
beunowell15:10
beunomy goal is for the team to do it's own reviews15:10
beunoand have teh UX team help with the long-term changes15:11
beunoand I'm not sure how to get there, but I'm starting to15:11
barryone other thing we talked about was adding a 'ui' specialty to ReviewerSchedule for people who have graduated from ui mentat15:11
beunoso if anyone has suggestions, ideas, comments, anything, I'd be very grateful15:12
beunoyes, it's on my ToDo15:12
barrybeuno: cool, thanks15:12
barrybeuno: do you want to join this meeting regularly?  i could add 'ui reviewer report' to the agenda15:12
beunobarry, I would like to try, yes15:13
* barry will be pingmaster :)15:13
barrybeuno: awesome, thanks.  i'll remove intellectronica's action item then15:13
barryanything else on ui reviewing, from anybody?15:14
barrycool, moving on15:14
barry[TOPIC] mentoring update15:14
MootBotNew Topic:  mentoring update15:14
barryi think i'll remove this topic for now.  when wgrant wants to become a reviewer we can add it back15:15
intellectronicaaren't we all reviewing now? i think this item can be skipped until some community members start reviewing15:15
barry[TOPIC] peanut gallery15:15
MootBotNew Topic:  peanut gallery15:15
barryintellectronica: yes, we are all reviewers!15:15
barryso, does anybody have anything not on the agenda?15:15
intellectronicayes15:16
barryi guess that's it then!15:16
intellectronicaalmost :)15:16
barryintellectronica: go4it15:17
gary_posterbarry: (I'm not going to be OCR on Wednesday because of team lead duties)15:17
gary_poster6 mo. :-)15:17
intellectronicaa reminder to everyone that python branches with a diff > 800 lines and javascript branches with a diff > 1600 lines are exceptional, and need to have a review sorted in advance. OCRs will often not be able to take them just like that15:17
barrygary_poster: gotcha.  EdwinGrubbs will have to carry the west15:18
gary_posterk15:18
barryintellectronica: thanks, and remember as a reviewer you always have a right to kick the branch back15:18
barryanything else today?15:19
barry515:19
* cprov feels guilty and hides.15:19
barry415:19
barry315:19
barry215:19
barry115:19
barry#endmeeting15:19
MootBotMeeting finished at 09:19.15:19
barrythanks everyone!15:19
jtvthanks barry15:20
gary_posterthanks barry15:20
intellectronicathanks barry15:20
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-food
=== gmb is now known as gmb-afk
=== gmb-afk is now known as gmb
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch
=== bigjools is now known as bigjools-afk
=== Ursinha-food is now known as Ursinha
=== gary_poster is now known as gary-lunch
=== EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-lunch
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado
=== gary-lunch is now known as gary_poster
=== danilos is now known as danilo-afk
=== Edwin-lunch is now known as EdwinGrubbs
=== salgado is now known as salgado-afk
=== cprov is now known as cprov-afk
barry#startmeeting23:30
MootBotMeeting started at 17:30. The chair is barry.23:30
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]23:30
barryhello and welcome to this week's asiapac meeting, who's here today?23:30
barrythumper, rockstar ping23:31
thumperhey23:31
barrythumper: hi.  i think it's just the three of us today, right?23:32
barryshould be a quick meeting i think23:32
thumperyep, although rockstar is out for a walk right now, so maybe just me23:32
thumperdid rockstar go to the earlier one?23:32
barrynope, he's joining us now23:32
barrys'okay, we can start (and maybe finish without him :)23:33
thumperok23:33
barrynot much to report from ameu; gary_poster will suspend ocr duties while he fills in for flacoste, who's filling in for kiko23:33
* thumper nods23:33
barrythat's really about it.  got anything on your mind today?23:33
* thumper thinks23:34
thumpermainly just 3.0 redesign23:34
thumperalthough...23:34
thumperthere was a question earlier by gmb23:34
thumperabout "do mechanical 3.0 changes need a ui review"23:34
thumperI was under the impression that mechanical ones don't23:34
thumpernew pages/designs do23:35
barrythose are up to the reviewer+dev.  if they feel it doesn't need another ui review, they're fine23:35
thumperok23:35
thumperthat's it for me23:35
wgrantOne thing...23:35
wgrantNot sure where is appropriate, though.23:35
thumpershoot23:35
thumperask away23:36
wgrantIt seems to me that contributors should always get a reviewer from the team that their branch targets, because otherwise the team has no chance to object.23:37
wgrantThe dev wiki just says to poke an OCR, but that probably often isn't right.23:37
thumperwgrant: I think it depends on the change23:37
barrywgrant: that should be okayedin a pre-imp call, likely with a team member23:37
thumperwgrant: if it is something trivial, then I'd be happy to OK a bugs or soyuz change23:38
barrywe're all /supposed/ to be be able to review anything23:38
thumperbut if it is not trivial, or requires more specialised knowledge23:38
thumperI'll pass it on, like I have done23:38
rockstaroops.23:38
rockstarHi23:38
barryrockstar: hi23:38
barrythumper: yep23:38
barrywgrant: does that make sense?23:38
wgrantbarry: It says to do the pre-imp chat with the OCR, but I suppose in most cases they'll just defer to a member of the right team, in which case that's fine.23:39
wgrantIt does.23:39
barrywgrant: cool, yep23:39
wgrantThanks.23:39
barrywgrant: it's great to see you here, and fantastic to see your branches landing.  how is the processing going for you?23:40
barryer, process23:40
wgrantbarry: Very well, apart from the opacity of PQM and ec2test.23:40
barrywgrant: well, at least we feel your pain there too :)23:40
thumperwgrant: we are wanting to move to LP queues23:41
wgrantThe actual review stuff is fine.23:41
thumperwgrant: which will make at least that part more visible23:41
wgrantBut after the review, it goes into a black hole and sometimes doesn't appear again.23:41
rockstarAnd once we're on queues, tarmac.23:41
barryrockstar: ftw23:41
thumperrockstar: maybe ;-)23:41
wgrantThere's also the problem of security branches, but I believe you're working that out elsewhere.23:41
wgrantThat hit me today.23:41
rockstarthumper, don't toy with my emotions like that...  :)23:41
thumperI'm supposed to come up with a plan23:41
barrywgrant: because you can't make private branches?23:41
thumperbut I've not had time right now with the 3.0 stuff23:42
wgrantbarry: Correct.23:42
thumperwe are planning the ability for anyone to be able to have a private branch23:42
thumperto fix security bugs23:42
wgrantbarry: I got spm to make it private, but then had to go back to him to get it visible to ~launchpad.23:42
thumperbut there are issues about who gets emailed when23:42
wgrantI'm not a member of ~launchpad, so I can't subscribe them to my private branch.23:42
barrythumper: would they have to be tied to security bugs?23:42
thumperbarry: possibly23:42
thumperbarry: we are lacking some ui ability23:42
barrywgrant: yep, that's losa territory23:42
thumperbarry: it may just work, but I'm not convinced, and will have to look at the tests23:43
barrycool.  rockstar anything on your mind for today?23:43
rockstarbarry, nope, not really.  I think the UI review for mechanical changes thing was the only thing.23:44
barryif there's nothing else from thumper, wgrant...23:44
wgrantIs devpad.info going to be public at some point?23:44
thumpernope23:44
thumperbuildbot is moving23:45
wgrantIt's annoying getting buildbot failures with me in the blamelist, and not being able to actually see what went wrong.23:45
wgrantAh.23:45
thumperwgrant: lpbuildbot.canonical.com23:45
thumperwgrant: but I'm not sure on the visibility of it23:45
rockstarIt should be public.23:45
wgrantthumper: Aha!23:46
wgrantBut no, it's not public.23:46
barryi think we're done...23:47
barry#endmeeting23:47
MootBotMeeting finished at 17:47.23:47
thumperthanks barry23:47
barrythanks everyone23:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!