[06:58] <tjaalton> Ng: right, the guy who made those patches is the g-p-m maintainer, so you need a newer g-p-m..
[06:58] <tjaalton> we all do :)
[07:13] <hyperair> what patches?
[07:16] <tjaalton> hyperair: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/08/17/gnome-power-manager-and-blanking-removal-of-bodges/
[07:23] <tjaalton> both are in karmic, so we just need a newer g-p-m
[08:07] <tseliot> bryce: where's the new nvidia-driver? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-180/
[08:21] <tjaalton> tseliot: what do you mean?
[08:22] <tseliot> tjaalton: see the discussion in ubuntu-devel
[09:21] <bryce> tseliot, rejected by archive admin again
[09:22] <tseliot> bryce: that was the one with -185 in the source
[09:22] <tseliot> tjaalton: uploaded the one with 180
[09:24] <tseliot> tjaalton was really the subject of my previous sentence... therefore s/:/
[09:25] <tseliot> s/://
[09:25] <bryce> ok
[09:26] <bryce> nite
[09:27] <tseliot> night bryce
[15:32] <kazade> hi, I noticed that there are some patches here ( http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/kms/ ) for R600 KMS, can we expect to see KMS on R600 in Karmic soon?
[15:33] <tjaalton> doubtful
[15:35] <kazade> :(
[15:36] <tjaalton> but that's just me, I don't know what bryce/apw have planned
[15:43] <kazade> ok, I just actually read the patch and it says: "This only provide a kms drm fb device for this hw and allow X to run with no acceleration" so yeh, not ready :)
[15:43] <apw> heh.  kernel support is there for some cards, but without mesa support its useless and that is a complex problem i believe
[15:44] <kazade> it's typical that I only just upgraded from an R300 (AGP) (when I knew KMS was coming) to an R500 (PCIe) and now I can't go back to try out KMS :/
[15:45] <kazade> *R600
[15:49] <kazade> well, at least I assume it's an R600... how can I tell?
[15:53] <tjaalton> yeah, there are many moving parts, and I'm not sure if it's robust enough just yet
[15:54] <kazade> well, I've got an HD3200... but I can't find anywhere whether that is an R500 chip, or R600... 
[15:56] <tjaalton> r600
[15:56] <kazade> ah ok thanks
[15:56] <tjaalton> hd2xxx-> is r6xx/7xx
[15:57] <tjaalton> er
[15:57] <tjaalton> well, yes
[18:50] <superm1> jbarnes, i've actually got the hardware for bug 416792 at my desk for today. is there anything else you'd like me to add to that bug while i've got it?
[18:52] <jbarnes> superm1: zhenyu said he posted a fix to intel-gfx, but I don't ahve it handy
[18:52] <jbarnes> iirc it was for the agp device
[18:52] <superm1> intel-gfx being an intel kernel git tree, or ML or what?
[18:53] <jbarnes> ml
[18:53] <jbarnes> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
[18:59] <superm1> i'm probably not too sure what i'm looking for, but if you were referring to http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2009-August/003824.html, the host bridge ID of this system is 0x0044 which was already supported
[19:01] <jbarnes> superm1: could be the "VGA plane" patch
[19:01] <jbarnes> looks like that patch might also be in "Patch to fix fdo bug #21064"
[19:03] <superm1> but those both look like they are the non-KMS case aren't they?
[19:04] <jbarnes> there should be a kms equivalent for the vga one I think
[19:04] <jbarnes> though maybe not... zhenyu is the real expert here
[19:04] <superm1> okay i won't get ahead of myself here then trying to look into it too much then :)
[19:05] <jbarnes> yeah sorry I'm only just starting to hack on iron lake stuff