=== zbraniecki is now known as gandi | ||
gnomefreak | i cant find the power button to my scanner :( | 12:04 |
---|---|---|
bdrung_ | maybe it has none? | 12:14 |
gnomefreak | bdrung_: it doesnt from what i can tell but xsane isnt seeing the scanner | 12:22 |
gnomefreak | im thinking power cord is bad | 12:22 |
bdrung_ | if the scanner has power something should glow | 12:23 |
gnomefreak | bdrung_: nothing is glowing thats what makes me think its power. i changed the usb port just incase it was bad but still no luck | 12:24 |
gnomefreak | i have another one and ill get it later i guess or see if i have another power cord for it | 12:25 |
bdrung_ | hm | 12:25 |
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
=== rickspencer3-afk is now known as rickspencer3 | ||
=== zbraniecki is now known as gandi | ||
andv | bdrung_, who gonna advocate you for DM? | 15:26 |
bdrung_ | andv: don't know. i will ask all my sponsors. | 15:26 |
andv | k | 15:27 |
gnomefreak | bug 383670 | 15:37 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 383670 in lightning-sunbird "thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp() when using Google Provider extension" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/383670 | 15:37 |
micahg | gnomefreak: do you know anything about the issue regarding bug 417582 | 15:50 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 417582 in firefox-3.5 "Firefox can't detect/change KDE default browser" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/417582 | 15:50 |
gnomefreak | micahg: lack of QT support maybe looking now | 15:51 |
gnomefreak | hats not helpful in the least | 15:51 |
micahg | I didn't know we even had that type of default configurable from Firefox on linux | 15:51 |
gnomefreak | we dont IIRC however why should firefox detect something outside our repos? | 15:52 |
gnomefreak | !info arora | 15:52 |
ubottu | arora (source: arora): simple cross platform web browser. In component main, is extra. Version 0.8.0-0ubuntu6 (karmic), package size 1201 kB, installed size 3388 kB | 15:52 |
micahg | yeah | 15:52 |
gnomefreak | oh it is | 15:52 |
micahg | it's the new KDE browser | 15:52 |
gnomefreak | firefox has no reason to detect that browser | 15:52 |
micahg | that's what I figured | 15:53 |
micahg | that it's handled differently than windows | 15:53 |
gnomefreak | the default browser changes should be made in update-alternatives | 15:53 |
micahg | do we support that at present? | 15:53 |
gnomefreak | update-*? | 15:53 |
micahg | yeah | 15:54 |
gnomefreak | Ubuntu does we dont | 15:54 |
micahg | ah | 15:54 |
gnomefreak | well kind of | 15:54 |
gnomefreak | we have links in our packages for the update-alternatives so you can shoose it from that setting | 15:54 |
micahg | oh, ok | 15:54 |
gnomefreak | s/shoose/choose | 15:54 |
gnomefreak | KDE should have a default browser setting in menu | 15:55 |
gnomefreak | if not that is thier issue | 15:55 |
micahg | they probably do | 15:55 |
bdrung_ | andv: now i see why you asked. :) | 15:59 |
andv | bdrung_, why? | 16:00 |
andv | :) | 16:00 |
bdrung_ | andv: you apply for it, too | 16:00 |
andv | bdrung_, yeah | 16:00 |
andv | bdrung_, soon a new package revision will be uploaded | 16:00 |
bdrung_ | of what? | 16:01 |
andv | bdrung_, so you should find an advocate / attach a changset asap | 16:01 |
andv | bdrung_, of debian-maintainers package | 16:01 |
bdrung_ | andv: i have send an email to 8 DDs, so hopefully someone will advocate me. | 16:01 |
gnomefreak | micahg: there maybe a setting in arora to make it default like there is in firefox | 16:02 |
andv | bdrung_, yeah^^ | 16:03 |
andv | bdrung_, prepare your changeset then | 16:03 |
bdrung_ | andv: do i need an advocate to create the changeset? | 16:08 |
andv | bdrung_, yes | 16:08 |
andv | bdrung_, in the changeset you have to list all your advocations | 16:08 |
bdrung_ | ah, ok | 16:09 |
=== rickspencer3 is now known as rickspencer3-afk | ||
=== stevel_ is now known as stevel | ||
BUGabundo | ola | 21:24 |
fta | gni | 21:29 |
BUGabundo | hi fta | 21:31 |
fta | it's quiet in here | 21:35 |
* micahg has questions, but they are for the man on vacation :) | 21:35 | |
BUGabundo | ehehe | 21:36 |
BUGabundo | so are you saying asac is the one that brings noise here? | 21:37 |
micahg | no | 21:37 |
BUGabundo | ok | 21:37 |
BUGabundo | :D | 21:37 |
micahg | just explaining why I'm not making nay | 21:37 |
micahg | *any | 21:37 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
[reed] | armin76: ping | 22:53 |
[reed] | where's asac, hmmz | 22:54 |
[reed] | jdstrand: around? | 22:54 |
andv | [reed], asas is on vacation | 22:54 |
andv | :) | 22:54 |
[reed] | ah | 22:54 |
jdstrand | [reed]: yes | 22:54 |
jdstrand | [reed]: what's up? | 22:54 |
[reed] | jdstrand: msg'd you | 22:57 |
jdstrand | ack | 23:06 |
e-jat | fta : here? | 23:11 |
fta | e-jat, 1/2 | 23:11 |
e-jat | half ? :) | 23:11 |
fta | yes | 23:12 |
e-jat | fta is your chromium still having the flash issue ? | 23:12 |
e-jat | is it must me 1 plugin show at about:plugins? | 23:13 |
e-jat | i mean for the flash .. | 23:13 |
fta | e-jat, when i tried, it was crashing, i filed http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20045 | 23:13 |
fta | not sure your bug is the same | 23:13 |
e-jat | for me is not crash .. but it cant view/render video from the youtube .. | 23:15 |
[reed] | you should just use Firefox ;) | 23:15 |
e-jat | [reed]: yea :) | 23:15 |
fta | [reed], ff trunk is unusable for me, it just refuses to start | 23:15 |
[reed] | fta: ? | 23:15 |
[reed] | fta: works fine for me | 23:15 |
fta | x64 | 23:15 |
fta | 32bit is fine | 23:16 |
[reed] | hmm, you should tell me these things! | 23:16 |
[reed] | do you have ia32-libs installed? | 23:16 |
fta | you disappeared for weeks | 23:16 |
[reed] | you can always e-mail me ;) | 23:16 |
fta | i use x64 at work, and i have better things to do than debug my browser | 23:17 |
[reed] | well, we want Firefox to work everywhere | 23:17 |
[reed] | so, if you can spare some time to debug it, that would be awesome | 23:18 |
[reed] | and hopefully we can get it fixed | 23:18 |
fta | 3.6 is still fine | 23:18 |
[reed] | I use official mozilla.org nightlies for trunk (3.7) on jaunty | 23:18 |
[reed] | but I'm also i686 | 23:19 |
fta | well, what could i say? it's been broken for at least a week for me on karmic x64 | 23:21 |
[reed] | yeah, well, can you give any more information? | 23:21 |
fta | no crash, no error, no nothing, just no window and i'm back to the shell (when started from a shell) | 23:21 |
[reed] | does gdb say anything? | 23:22 |
fta | strace shows that it starts well, then it releases the lock and exit | 23:22 |
[reed] | hmm | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | I'm on 3.7 | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | dailly ppa | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | works ok | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | on 64bits | 23:22 |
fta | nope, gdb does help, it doesn't catch anything | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | only prob: Fullscreen bug | 23:22 |
[reed] | BUGabundo: x86_64? | 23:22 |
[reed] | BUGabundo: fullscreen bug? | 23:23 |
BUGabundo | [reed]: ^^^^ | 23:23 |
BUGabundo | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511080 | 23:23 |
[reed] | fta: hmm, could you try building debug? | 23:23 |
ubottu | Mozilla bug 511080 in General "exiting from full screen doesnt return to regular window" [Normal,Unconfirmed] | 23:23 |
fta | for me, it works only once after each upgrade, the next day in the morning, nada | 23:23 |
[reed] | hmm | 23:24 |
BUGabundo | fta start in safemode, quit, start again it work | 23:24 |
BUGabundo | been like that for 4 months :( | 23:25 |
BUGabundo | better now in 3.7 | 23:25 |
BUGabundo | but still fails to start sometimes | 23:25 |
[reed] | BUGabundo: so, it works 20090816 but not 20090817 ? | 23:25 |
[reed] | heh | 23:25 |
BUGabundo | greasemokey does make it worse | 23:25 |
[reed] | have you filed a bug on that? | 23:25 |
BUGabundo | [reed]: at least one mine on LP | 23:25 |
BUGabundo | [reed]: let me test it again with todays build | 23:26 |
BUGabundo | I haven't done it yet | 23:26 |
[reed] | k | 23:26 |
BUGabundo | I didn't even got updates :\\ | 23:26 |
[reed] | need to find a regression range to really figure it out | 23:26 |
* BUGabundo runs $ sudo aptitude update ; sudo aptitude safe-upgrade ; sudo aptitude full-upgrade | 23:26 | |
BUGabundo | [reed]: that's why I posted the Revision | 23:27 |
BUGabundo | and that's what Dailies are for :) | 23:27 |
[reed] | yeah, so, it works 20090816 but not 20090817 ? | 23:27 |
BUGabundo | right | 23:29 |
[reed] | hmm | 23:30 |
[reed] | maybe mozilla bug 503791 | 23:34 |
ubottu | Mozilla bug 503791 in Layout: Form Controls "Drop down menu at page bottom edge not displayed completely" [Minor,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503791 | 23:34 |
BUGabundo | hum?? | 23:36 |
BUGabundo | that's not my bug | 23:36 |
BUGabundo | not even close | 23:36 |
BUGabundo | don't start spewing bug, or else ill start thinking I have them all :D | 23:36 |
[reed] | I'm looking at patches that landed | 23:37 |
[reed] | http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2009-08-16+&enddate=2009-08-18 | 23:37 |
BUGabundo | ahh | 23:37 |
BUGabundo | [reed]: what would it take to debug what the F**k is causing gmail to kill my firefox? | 23:37 |
BUGabundo | it eats all my cpu | 23:37 |
BUGabundo | prob one of my addons | 23:37 |
BUGabundo | but I disabled them all and still got it | 23:38 |
BUGabundo | it happenes on both ubuntu and debian | 23:38 |
fta | [reed], i also have huge repaint problems with trunk, mostly forums | 23:38 |
BUGabundo | with the daily ppa | 23:38 |
BUGabundo | on 3.6 and 3.7 | 23:38 |
BUGabundo | humm I have that too | 23:38 |
BUGabundo | though it was a debian X bug | 23:38 |
[reed] | fta: just trunk? | 23:39 |
[reed] | 3.6 is fine? | 23:39 |
fta | [reed], i assume the new ff is a security update, right? (3.0.14 & 3.5.3) | 23:40 |
[reed] | yes | 23:40 |
[reed] | nothing special | 23:41 |
fta | too bad it's in main, i'm only a motu and i can't update it there | 23:41 |
[reed] | just normal update | 23:41 |
[reed] | scheduled release is September 9th | 23:41 |
fta | maybe with the archive reorg, i will gain that power... | 23:42 |
fta | or loose everything :P | 23:42 |
BUGabundo | eeh | 23:42 |
BUGabundo | you should | 23:42 |
micahg | 3.5.3 has some other fixes unless they were pushed back | 23:43 |
[reed] | security & stability update | 23:43 |
[reed] | :) | 23:43 |
micahg | :) | 23:43 |
micahg | I started tagging the fixed versions in LP since we don't have a system to handle that yet | 23:43 |
[reed] | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL%20status1.9.1:.3-fixed | 23:45 |
[reed] | I see 53 bugs fixed | 23:45 |
micahg | I see 42 :) | 23:45 |
fta | 42+11 private? | 23:45 |
fta | :) | 23:45 |
micahg | at least 3 we have in LP | 23:46 |
micahg | including the full screen flash issue | 23:46 |
bdrung_ | micahg: 42 :) | 23:47 |
bdrung_ | that's the right number | 23:48 |
micahg | bdrung_: [reed]sees 53 | 23:48 |
fta | yep, 42 :) | 23:49 |
fta | i mean, "the" number | 23:49 |
[reed] | micahg: reed is also a member of the security group ;) | 23:49 |
micahg | right :) | 23:49 |
bdrung_ | fta: :) | 23:49 |
bdrung_ | fta: you got it | 23:50 |
fta | sure, 42, the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything | 23:50 |
micahg | [reed]: is there a document on how crashes are labeled in bmo | 23:52 |
[reed] | micahg: https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Triaging_crash_bugs | 23:52 |
micahg | ty | 23:53 |
micahg | that will help to see if it's an upstream issue | 23:53 |
BUGabundo | fta "but what is the question?" ehehe | 23:53 |
* micahg knows... | 23:54 | |
micahg | [reed]: is this anything? http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2009/Aug/0194.html | 23:55 |
[reed] | looks like just a DoS... I don't know of a bug in bmo that's tracking it, though | 23:55 |
micahg | do I need to worry about opening a bug for it? | 23:56 |
micahg | or is it not an issue | 23:56 |
[reed] | well, it's an "issue", but I don't know if we're tracking it yet | 23:56 |
micahg | ah, ok | 23:56 |
[reed] | feel free to open a new bmo bug | 23:56 |
micahg | ok | 23:57 |
micahg | mabe later tonight | 23:57 |
[reed] | it's public, but I still would recommend you check the "this bug is a security issue" box so that the security group triages it rather than the normal triagers | 23:57 |
micahg | ok | 23:57 |
[reed] | even though it's public | 23:57 |
[reed] | it just works out better that way | 23:57 |
micahg | I figured I'd open one in Launchpad as well | 23:57 |
[reed] | sure | 23:58 |
[reed] | won't be long before launchpad and bmo can be linked | 23:58 |
[reed] | just waiting on bmo to upgrade | 23:58 |
micahg | really? | 23:58 |
[reed] | yeah | 23:58 |
micahg | that's great | 23:58 |
micahg | how would that work? | 23:58 |
micahg | I could just say push upstream? | 23:58 |
[reed] | afaik, Bugzilla 3.4 supports everything launchpad needs in order to link | 23:58 |
[reed] | no | 23:58 |
[reed] | means you can link bugs | 23:59 |
[reed] | and comments will flow from one to the other | 23:59 |
micahg | ah, well | 23:59 |
micahg | that's good and bad | 23:59 |
micahg | reporters might not always be interested in upstream comments, but I think triagers would be | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!