/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/08/25/#ubuntu-motu.txt

bdrung_(need one night to grab all) :)00:00
bdrung_xnox: + 1,2 GiB from my ppas00:00
* stochastic throws his hands up in a moment of "I give up" frustration, but thanks bdrung_ for all his help thus far.00:03
bdrung_yw00:03
bdrung_stochastic: the problem is that the patch is already applied to this file00:05
* stochastic is new to dpatch and doesn't understand what he's done wrong00:06
bdrung_stochastic: you could use quilt instead00:09
bdrung_stochastic: or if you want a very simple patch system, you could use cdbs + simple-patchsys00:09
stochasticI don't know quilt and the docs said it's much more difficult to setup00:09
stochasticis there something wrong with dpatch?00:09
bdrung_stochastic: i don't know if it is dpatch's fault or caused by something else.00:10
stochasticbdrung_ well I guess i have no other option than to give up on this package00:15
stochasticbdrung_ thanks anyway00:15
bdrung_stochastic: if you ask me tomorrow i may digg into this issue00:16
stochasticdtchen, thanks for adding ubuntu-devel to the Jack in Main discussion00:17
dtchenstochastic: np00:17
=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung
stochasticbdrung, could you test out the latest upload?00:29
bdrungyes00:29
bdrungstochastic: same issue00:32
bdrungstochastic: remove the autogen.sh call. it is not necessary (the configure file exists)00:35
stochasticbdrung, removed and uploaded00:39
=== ghostcube_ is now known as ghostcube
bdrungstochastic: i have fixed the rebuild bug (i broke the butterfly on the wheel)00:48
bdrungZhenech: got my mail?01:11
sbalneavHello.  I'm having a problem working on a package for a backport to hardy.  The upstream tarball requires that I patch up some build requirements in configure.ac and rerun autoconf before the package will build.  Does anyone know the correct debian/rules magic for that?01:28
bdrungsbalneav: you have to run autoreconf before you run ./configure01:39
bdrungsbalneav: you may want to use a patch system for the patch01:40
sbalneavThe package itself uses cdbs01:40
sbalneavhave you got an example you could point me at?01:41
bdrungsbalneav: for autoconf there are some variables, you could set01:42
sbalneavthe configure.ac basically defines a couple of "minimum" package levels.  The package works fine with older versions, so I just need to bump them down.01:44
bdrungsbalneav: you can set DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF to the version you want01:44
bdrungsbalneav: which package?01:45
sbalneavsabayon.01:45
sbalneavI've been working getting a version going for karmic, but many people would like a version for hardy.01:46
sbalneavI'd like to create a backport in my ppa.01:46
bdrung_sbalneav: try to add "DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF := 2.61" to your rules file01:51
sbalneavok01:51
=== qiyong_ is now known as qiyong
=== keylocker is now known as leleobhz
=== jtimberm1n is now known as jtimberman
=== pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu
stochasticwould any motu with a spare minute please glance through http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/xjadeo06:08
dholbachgood morning06:47
fabrice_spgood morning dholbach :-)07:26
dholbachhiya fabrice_sp!07:26
iulianMorning dholbach, fabrice_sp.07:26
dholbachhey iulian07:26
fabrice_spgood morning iulian07:26
dholbachlooks like we could do a bit of sponsoring before feature freeze :)07:26
iulianIndeed.07:27
fabrice_spspeaking about sponsoring :-)07:27
dholbachyes? :)07:27
fabrice_spabout bug #416262 : I don't think aptoncd will make his path to Debian before FF, so I propose to update the package in Ubuntu07:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 416262 in aptoncd "Please update aptoncd to version 0.1.98+bzr112" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41626207:27
fabrice_spit's the same content as the Debian upload, but the package has not being sponsored yet, and I'm travelling this morning, until 3rd of Sptember (Holidays! :-) )07:29
dholbachfabrice_sp: nice! enjoy your holidays!07:30
dholbachwhere are you going?07:30
dholbachbrb07:33
warnerhey, quick question. dput reported a successful upload of my four packages (foolscap, zfec, pycryptopp, tahoe) to revu.ubuntuwire.com several hours ago, but I'm not seeing them on the REVU "New Packages" list. Is there anywhere I should look to find out about upload errors?07:35
fabrice_spdholbach, thanks :-) I'm going to Canary's Island ;-)07:39
dholbachnice :)07:41
warneriulian: zooko said I should ping you once the Tahoe packages were uploaded, but I'm not sure if you'll be able to see them yet07:41
iulianwarner: Have you uploaded them to REVU?07:43
warneryes, in theory, although I'm not seeing them on http://revu.ubuntuwire.com07:44
warner(dput reported success, to the right server)07:44
iulianjpds: ^^07:44
iulianOr any other REVU admin.07:45
warnerthe only thing I can think of is that my launchpad email address is slightly different than the package's debian/changelog's top-most address07:46
warnerbut they're all signed by the same GPG key that I registered with launchpad this afternoon07:46
iulianwarner: Have you logged in to REVU?07:47
warneryup, the page says "Logged in as warner." at the top right now07:48
iulianHmm, no idea.  You'll have to talk to a REVU admin (already pinged one).07:49
warnerthanks07:49
warneriulian: do you know offhand if you or zooko filed ITPs for these packages? I don't know how to search launchpad for them (being more familiar with debian, myself). I don't have proper Closes:/LP: entries in the package changelogs yet.07:50
iulianwarner: I cannot remember, sorry.07:51
warners'ok, thanks07:51
warneris there a launchpad ITP page?07:51
lifelessno07:52
lifelessits not structurally different to other bugs07:52
lifelessalso ITP is a bit of a buggy concept07:52
lifelessRFP is sensible, as is REVU, but declaring intent... may as well JFDI07:53
* warner nods07:53
warnerso the "LP:" entry in the changelog is defined as closing an RFP bug as opposed to an "ITP" bug?07:53
warnerand such RFP bugs are to be found.. filed under the submitter's proposed package name?07:54
lifelesspersonally, I don't bother having an initial bug to close.07:54
lifelesshttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages07:55
warnergreat! I'll ignore that lintian warning then :)07:55
lifelessit says to file one, but like I say.. meh.07:55
* lifeless waits for the flames07:56
warnerI'll quote you when the REVU comments start coming in, then :)07:56
warnerah, tahoe has a needs-packaging bug filed already, #41713607:57
* warner updates the changelog07:57
lifelessright, if there is one definitely close it.07:58
warnerand zfec has #289430 ..07:58
lifelessBut creating a bug saying I'm doing X, only to close it a few minutes later is well... nuts.07:58
lifelessits like writing a note while you do the dishes saying "I'm doing the dishes"07:59
warnerhuh, sounds like twitter :)07:59
lifelessshudder07:59
lifelessso buildbot. Unit tests.07:59
lifeless(I do have the right person don't I?)07:59
warnerum08:00
* warner looks shifty08:00
warnersure, shoot08:00
lifelessso, have you seen subunit?08:00
warnernope08:01
lifelesshttps://launchpad.net/subunit/08:01
lifelessproject of mine.08:01
warnercool. should we take this to #buildbot ?08:01
warnerhuh, weird that the two needs-packaging bugs have numbers that are so far apart08:06
siretartany emacs fans around?08:17
lifelesshahaha08:17
lifelessoops, did I type that out loud?08:18
siretartif yes, please package emacs23, using the package from debian before thursday08:18
siretartlifeless: I bet you did :)08:18
StevenKsiretart: Uh huh, did you even read the sync request bug about emacs23 from Debian?08:34
siretartStevenK: ups? no. do you have the bug no at hand?08:51
StevenKsiretart: Bug 40808508:52
ubottuLaunchpad bug 408085 in ubuntu "Sync emacs23 23.1+1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40808508:52
siretartthanks08:53
siretartStevenK: ah, ok. best would probably be not a plain sync, but a hard dependency on the non-dfsg-free docs (they are fsf-free)08:54
StevenKsiretart: Then say so, and deal with the bug08:55
* SiDi is looking for an Ubuntu maintainer for Exaile, please pm me if you want to help. Thanks in advance.09:32
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
sluimersI know it's a stupid question but, what does MOTU stand for?10:55
\shsluimers: Masters Of The Universe10:56
sluimerscool, and do they package stuff and put it in the Ubuntu archive? Because that's what it looks like to me.10:57
sluimersAnyway, I have a little problem and I got sent here.10:58
\shsluimers: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU <- all you need to know about MOTU10:59
bdrung_stochastic:  i have fixed the rebuild bug (i broke the butterfly on the wheel)11:02
* sluimers reads some more from MOTU11:02
bdrung_stochastic: here is what i did: http://paste.ubuntu.com/259208/11:03
=== warner is now known as warner_sleep
AnAntHello, what happened to python-xml package ?11:38
iulianIt got removed a long time ago IIRC.11:41
geserDeleted  on 2009-06-08: obsolete and broken; reverse-deps must be migrated to core python modules. LP: #34324211:42
AnAntgeser: thanks11:45
AnAntah, the bug is still open11:47
AnAntreopened rather11:48
AnAntoh, won't fix11:48
=== keylocker is now known as leleobhz
AnAntok, python2.6 would do !12:01
AnAntthanks12:01
Q-FUNKhi!  I'd be interested in feedback on MartinEricRacine/UploadRightsApplication especially on how it's supposed to differ from my previous (succesful) application as ubuntu member.12:06
gnomefreakis there a reason we dont support lexmark hardware?12:11
directhexlack of drivers, at a guess?12:12
gnomefreakthier site doesnt have linux drivers that i can see nor tarball so i am pretty much out of luck?12:14
directhexvery likely. how's the printer db on openprinting look?12:15
directhexsome companies are more pro-linux than others with their printers. lexmark stuggle to be pro-windows, let alone anything else12:15
gnomefreakmaybe ill try nspluginwrapper12:17
directhexnspluginwrapper? i'm not sure how loading 32-bit flash in 64-bit firefox will help12:20
directhexwhich model? http://openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi?make=Lexmark suggests about 50% should work12:21
gnomefreakx615012:23
gnomefreakdirecthex: thanks for the link looking at it atm12:24
gnomefreakno known scanner drivers :(12:25
gnomefreakdirecthex: its not nspluginwrapper sorry wrong thing. i cant recall the name of the package im looking for that will run .exe drivers12:31
directhexgnomefreak, ndiswrapper. note that "ndis" means "Network Driver Interface Specification"12:32
gnomefreakdirecthex: yeah i saw that and i remember that is what i used to set up wifi12:34
james_werror: plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/buil12:39
james_wder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder: Too many levels of symbolic links12:39
james_woops12:39
sorenOh, dear :)12:42
sorendirecthex: Lexmark used to be /very/ Windows-only, but at some point they started writing and releasing Linux drivers themselves.12:43
sorendirecthex: This must have been in 2001-ish.12:44
gnomefreaksoren: sort of12:44
gnomefreakatleast i cant find the scanner drivers for it i already have too many printers12:44
gnomefreaki guess im going to use it on wmy win box and just email it to myself12:47
=== proppy1 is now known as proppy
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson
james_wanybody have a minute for a review of http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/lazr.restfulclient ?13:13
james_wneeded for the new launchpadlib13:13
ttxjames_w: about bug 41642013:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 416420 in backport-util-concurrent "Sync backport-util-concurrent 3.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41642013:14
james_whey ttx13:15
ttxjames_w: hey :)13:15
ttxjames_w: that sounds like a bad idea because it brings all the new maven-repo-helper infra into main, through eucalyptus13:15
ttxfurthermore version 3 is untested13:15
james_wfeel free to back it out13:15
ttxjames_w: how should I proceed to do that ?13:16
james_wit was ACKed my a MOTU and looked sane, I don't invest any further than that in sync requests13:16
james_wdepends how much you want to revert13:16
ttxwell, going back to where it was 24 hours ago, is it possible ?13:16
james_wif you just want to go back to the previous package then you can grab that from lp, increment the version with some sort of "really" version number and upload it13:16
ttxhmmm13:17
james_wsource package is on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-util-concurrent/2.2+dfsg-1ubuntu113:17
ttxI'll try the middle way, try to see if we can work with the new version and just revert the new maven-repo stuff13:18
ttxif we can't, I'll play the "really" trick13:18
ttxjames_w: thanks13:18
james_wnp13:21
iulianjames_w: The information from README.txt is already included in HACKING.txt.  Do you want this?13:21
james_wiulian: you mean the license text?13:23
iulianjames_w: Yup.13:24
james_wdropped README.txt13:24
iulianjames_w: Go ahead and upload.13:26
james_wthanks iulian13:26
=== freeflyi2g is now known as freeflying
iulianUnable to start the settings manager 'gnome-settings-daemon'.13:43
iulianWithout the GNOME settings manager running, some preferences may not take effect. This could indicate a problem with Bonobo, or a non-GNOME (e.g. KDE) settings manager may already be active and conflicting with the GNOME settings manager13:43
iulianWeird.13:43
iulianTheme changed automatically and when I tried to set it back I got this message.13:44
geserjames_w: you seems to be missing XS-Python-Version and XB-Python-Version in lazr.restfulclient so it only gets available for python2.6 (see also the depends on python; and the lintian warning)13:51
james_wthanks geser14:02
geserjames_w: and the \ in "python setup.py install --root=\$(CURDIR)..." looks also misplaced14:03
geserjames_w: and I see now that python is twice in Build-Depends14:04
* hyperair grumbles about liferea being unresponsive and slow14:13
james_wthanks geser14:14
pochuhyperair: :(14:14
hyperairpochu: :(14:14
hyperairpochu: it seems to like churning up my hard disk and hanging.14:14
pochuhyperair: 1.6?14:17
hyperairpochu: ye, 1.614:19
zookoiulian: hello!  My partner Brian Warner built Debian packages for Tahoe-LAFS and uploded them to REVU.  :-)14:39
zookoTime for me to walk my children to school...14:42
=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung
jtimbermanChef and other packages it depends on look to be going into Karmic (uploaded to NEW or already in). Is there a document that describes how to get universe packages backported (I'm willing to do the packaging of course) to LTS and other releases?15:00
ghostcubefta: when does youre daily build repo get updated normally for songbird15:01
=== ivoks_ is now known as ivoks
ScottK!backports | jtimberman15:06
ubottujtimberman: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging15:06
bddebianHeya gang15:07
ScottKHeya bddebian.15:08
bddebianHi ScottK15:08
sistpoty|workhi bddebian15:09
bddebianHeya sistpoty|work15:11
lfaraoneHey, if a MOTU acks a sync request, why does it still need to be manually reviewed by a Archive Admin?15:26
james_wwhat do you mean?15:27
geserlfaraone: not reviewed, but processed15:27
james_wit's a manual process of processing them15:27
james_wand that involves checking that it has an ACK etc.15:27
lfaraonejames_w: would it be difficult to create criteria that would make it automagic?15:27
james_wand sometimes you spot something, and surely it's better to comment then?15:27
james_wyeah15:27
james_wthe fact that LP doesn't support syncing entirely within LP yet15:28
jtimbermanmanual process of uploading i recall is deliberate.15:28
jtimbermanat least from the debian side.15:28
lfaraonejames_w: Well, "if reporter is in MOTU and report is assigned to AA, and is set by member of MOTU to "confirmed""...15:28
james_wyou could cron it, but as we are using bugs there are too many corner cases...15:28
james_wlfaraone: what about the process bothers you?15:30
SiDiNoob question : if i'm packaging an plugin from an app X that is python based, should i add python to the plugin's deps, knowing that it already depends on X ?15:30
RoAkSoAxivoks, you busy?15:30
lfaraonejames_w: well, it seems to be inefficient, and I suffer from impatience. (such mundane tasks should, imho, be automated)15:31
lfaraoneSiDi: Yes.15:31
james_wlfaraone: yes, they should, and there is work underway to do so15:31
ivoksRoAkSoAx: yes15:36
SiDilfaraone, okey, thanks15:40
lfaraonejames_w: Okay.15:40
JontheEchidnaPOX_: ping15:43
POX_JontheEchidna: You sent me a contentless ping.  This is a contentless pong.  Please provide a bit of information about what you want and I will respond when I am around.15:43
JontheEchidnaheh15:43
JontheEchidnaPOX_: Hey, seems kadu ftbfs with the latest gcc. I found a patch here that should fix it: http://starowa.one.pl/~uzi/kadu/kadu-gcc44.patch15:44
JontheEchidnagoogle-translated forum post: http://tinyurl.com/lkthqq15:44
mptHi folks. Is there a bug tag already being used for packages that have unhelpful summaries or descriptions?15:50
mptAnd if not, what would be a good name for this tag? :-)15:50
james_wmpt: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags15:51
james_wso no, apparently not15:51
mptapart from 'string-fix', tangentially15:52
james_wthat would work15:52
mptand 'desktop-file', for applications15:52
james_wthough it may be more of "rewrite the description" rather than "it should be theirs and not there's"15:53
Hobbseempt: 'unhelpful' would be a good name, but i'm sure that's not PC ;)15:53
james_wwhy not?15:53
james_w"unhelpful-description" if you want to avoid every bug being tagged that :-)15:53
mptActually I was thinking of spelling/grammar/layout errors as well15:54
Hobbseejames_w: something about not being positive enough15:54
james_wmpt: string-fix would seem to be appropriate then15:55
mpt"description" would be a bit too specific, but "metadata" would be too vague15:55
james_wI thought you were looking more specifically15:55
sistpoty|workhuhu siretart, I already found a sponsor, DktrKranz will make use of his new DD powers :)15:55
siretartDktrKranz: congrats :-)15:56
siretartsistpoty|work: :-)15:56
DktrKranzsiretart: thanks :)15:58
DktrKranzI'm not the only MOTU to cheer ;)15:58
DktrKranzsistpoty|work: btw, if you're in a hurry, please go ahead :)15:59
sistpoty|workDktrKranz: no, I'm not in a hurry :)15:59
POX_JontheEchidna: kadu should work fine with GCC 4.4 since 0.6.5.2-2 (dunno what version Ubuntu has). BTW: patryk is now a DD so I no longer sponsor kadu16:01
Laneywhat are we congratulating DktrKranz for?16:01
POX_please ask for a sync with Debian16:01
POX_Laney: he's a DD now16:01
porthoseDktrKranz, congrats! :)16:02
DktrKranzdo not forget pochu, he's DD too16:02
Laneyoh, nice!16:02
sistpoty|workcongrats, pochu!16:02
directhexand direc, no, wait :(16:02
Laneysponsor stuff plz16:03
directhexyeah, DktrKranz is the new debian mono & haskell sponsor!16:03
pochusistpoty|work, Laney: ty!16:03
sistpoty|workdirecthex: maybe mono gets you penalties in NM :P16:03
slytherinfor person in motu_list if DD=yes then congratulations. :-)16:03
DktrKranzdirecthex: haha16:04
directhexsistpoty|work, i'd need to check the list of current front desk people to know how much reality matches that16:04
sistpoty|workheh16:04
Laneyschestow...oh crap16:04
slytherindholbach: ping16:04
DktrKranzporthose: thanks16:05
DktrKranz:)16:05
RoAkSoAxcongrats DktrKranz16:05
DktrKranzhey RoAkSoAx, thanks16:06
dholbachslytherin: pong16:06
jbernard__does anyone have some time to revu libcgroup (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libcgroup)?16:06
DktrKranzRoAkSoAx: btw, advocated lekhonee16:06
=== sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | Development of Karmic Koala has started -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ . Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) is now officially Debian Developer! HUG HIM!
slytherindholbach: ttf-indic-fonts needs a merge. One of the fonts have been deemed non-free and removed from the package. I would do it myself but I do not have good understanding of package structure.16:07
sebnerDktrKranz: congratulations! mauahahahaha16:07
RoAkSoAxDktrKranz, yeah I saw it, thanks a lot!! I'm on my search for another advocator :)16:07
dholbachslytherin: hum... can you have a chat with ArneGoetje about that?16:07
slytherinVia email?16:07
dholbachas he's based in Taiwan he might be off the internet now16:08
slytherinDktrKranz: Congrats.16:08
slytherindholbach: I will try the merge on weekend then.16:08
DktrKranzsebner: thanks, but no need a topic for that (and you forgot emilio, btw)16:08
JontheEchidnaPOX_: We synced -4, still fails16:08
dholbachslytherin: super, thanks16:08
JontheEchidnaPOX_: thanks for the heads up about maintainership, tho16:09
sebnerDktrKranz: your idea, your fault :P  emilio?16:10
Laneyso yeah16:10
Laneyabout goocanvasmm in pkg-gnome svn... ;)16:11
DktrKranzsebner: my idea? :P... pochu is DD too16:11
sebnerDktrKranz: Oh really? I have to send new emails too to the dev-lists :P16:11
DktrKranzLOL16:11
dholbachcongrats DktrKranz16:13
pochusebner: no need for it :)16:13
sebnerpochu: upps, just sent the mails :P Congrats also from me16:14
pochuthanks :) hope to see you in the queue at som epoint ;)16:15
=== sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | Development of Karmic Koala has started -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ . Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) and Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | Development of Karmic Koala has started -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved
sebnerpochu: too late :P16:15
pochuDktrKranz: you're released! \o/16:15
* cody-somerville hugs pochu and DktrKranz.16:15
DktrKranzsebner: I have to find a good hideout now :)16:16
sebnerpochu: DM at some point this year16:16
sebnerDktrKranz: yeah, mail replies are starting \o/16:16
pochusebner: party, yohoo!16:16
RoAkSoAxcongrats pochu16:16
LaneyI never saw the mail on debian-newmaint16:17
Laneywhere was it announced?16:17
pochutopic> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ . Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) and Jaunty is released16:17
pochumaybe it's not yet16:17
Laneyalreet16:17
DktrKranzLaney: you got a welcome mail once your account is created16:17
DktrKranz*get16:17
Laneyah16:18
DktrKranzs/welcome/2_pages_long_here_what_you_have_do_to/16:18
iulianDktrKranz, pochu: Congratulations.16:18
DktrKranzthanks dholbach iulian!16:19
pochuthanks guys16:19
DktrKranzpochu: they probably mean s/thanks/sponsor me something/ :)16:20
pochu=)16:21
Laneythanks, now get to work reviewing my packages!16:21
* Laney cracks the whip16:22
* sebner asks himself if he should change the topic to: New Debian Sponsors: pochu and DktrKranz :O16:22
sistpoty|worksebner: can you sanitize and clean up the topic a little bit, now that you're the last one you touched it? (e.g. you could mention that we're all doomed, err that FF starts on Thursday)16:30
sebnersistpoty|work: haha! uiuiui, really doomed. I'm sorry16:31
sistpoty|worksebner: just guessing on the rate of "just before feature freeze" breakage :P16:31
Laneytopic is a bit of a mess isn't it16:32
=== sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | We are nearing Feature Freeze for Karmic (27th August) | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/
sistpoty|workexcellent!16:32
sistpoty|workthanks sebner16:32
sebnersistpoty|work: thanks for the hint. /me was just too excited xD16:33
* DktrKranz can now hide16:33
sistpoty|worksebner: sure, no problem, I just thought that also the old topic could need cleanup :)16:33
LaneyJaunty is released?16:34
sebnersistpoty|work: 2 Fliegen mit einer Klappe ^^16:34
Laneyold news int it?16:34
sebnerLaney: still the actual release though16:34
sebnerand we want SRU'S16:34
Laneydon't think it's topic worthy16:35
=== sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | We are nearing Feature Freeze for Karmic (27th August) | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/
* sebner hides now16:36
* Laney wonders why that links is in the topic at all16:37
Laneyseems only motu-sru would want to use it16:37
* sebner didn't set it :)16:37
Laneyinfact both of the main links go to a blank page16:37
* Laney would link to sponsor queue, debcheck, uehs16:38
=== nxvl_ is now known as nxvl
sistpoty|workLaney: just do it :P16:38
LaneyI somehow broke my irssi16:38
Laneyso I can't tab complete the topic16:38
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Karmic Feature Freeze this Thursday (27th August) | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://is.gd/2y76G | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck
Laneyrawr16:41
iulianLooks better now.16:43
Riddellkklimonda: ping16:48
Riddellkklimonda: you uploaded a SRU for zabbix?  there's no patch on the bug report and no motu-sru approval16:49
dholbachmok0: bug 271260 :)16:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 271260 in ubuntu "Sahana - disaster management application - for inclusion to repos - help reqd" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/27126016:49
dholbachmok0: didn't know there was somebody interested in packaging sahana as well16:49
kklimondariddell: hmm.. there were two similar bugs and I think I have prepared a single debdiff that fixed both of them.16:54
Riddellkklimonda: the only thing in the changelog is "  * debian/zabbix-server-{mysql,pgsql}.zabbix-server.init: - Create pid directory in /var/run on start (LP: #172775)"16:55
Riddelland indeed that's the only change in the debdiff16:56
kklimondariddel: oh, wait - i have no upload rights so i havent uploaded it. ;)16:56
kklimondai don't know what got uploade to be honest as I'm out of town for the last week or so. I remember getting an email from LP about it and that's it. if you could say what's wrong I'd appreciate it. :)16:59
james_wis there a special procedure for transferring a conffile from one package to another?17:02
Riddellkklimonda: what's wrong is the lack of patch or motu-sru approval on bug 17277517:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 172775 in zabbix "/var/run/zabbix-server deleted after reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17277517:07
james_wno, not any more apparently17:09
Riddellkklimonda: looks like Devid Antonio Filoni <d.filoni@ubuntu.com> uploaded it17:09
kklimondariddel: i agree that i should probably attach patch to both bugs, i thoght that as they are similar it would be easier to work on both of them in one bug.17:10
Riddellkklimonda: I have no idea what the other bug is17:11
kklimondaas for the lack of sru ack I kow about it, I was talking with on of motu-sru guys about it but hwe had some concerns and then had to go before i've managed to explain them. But I haven't uploaded them myself, actually I wouldn't do it without a sru ack.17:12
Riddellkklimonda: so what is this other bug which is so similar?17:14
kklimondabug 9664417:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 96644 in zabbix "zabbix_agentd will not start after reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/9664417:14
Riddellkklimonda: right, that's what I need to know.  I'll accept the package17:16
geserkklimonda: according to the signature it was "Devid Antonio Filoni" who uploaded your changes17:16
prefrontalis there any chance that i can get my package into karmic?17:17
prefrontalor should i not even try getting into the game this late17:17
=== vorian is now known as OldSchool
=== hanska is now known as Guest70049
bdrunghow can i set the default key for signing debian packages?17:29
=== Guest70049 is now known as hanska
slytherinprefrontal: it depends on the state of package. feature freeze is on 27th August.17:31
slytherinbdrung: set environment variable DEBEMAIL to the email address of your key.17:31
bdrungslytherin: i have two key that fit the DEBEMAIL17:32
slytherinthen I don't know the solution.17:32
jmarsdenbdrung: /etc/devscripts.conf I think17:32
jmarsdenDEBSIGN_KEYID=whatever17:33
slytherinbdrung: DEBSIGN_KEYID17:33
prefrontalslytherin, alright i will give it a shot.. and try to make it perfect ;)17:34
bdrungjmarsden: thanks, that works.17:37
jmarsdenbdrung: No problem.17:37
jbernard__i uploaded libcgroup (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libcgroup) to REVU, if anyone has some cycles to review it I'd be very grateful17:45
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth
Riddelljtimberman: chef should point to /usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0 in its copyright file18:04
jtimbermanRiddell: is that blocking?18:06
Riddelljtimberman: no I've accepted it18:06
Riddellbut fix it for next upload18:06
jtimbermanRiddell: Definitely! Thank you.18:06
jtimbermanRiddell: Won't be long, we're preparing to release 0.7.10 "soon" :-)18:07
ftaghostcube, daily :)18:46
ftaghostcube, ... about 5pm UTC18:47
ghostcubefta, last update is from saturday18:48
ghostcubethats why i asked about :)18:49
ghostcubecause ff anbd tb are pushing dailies into my apt but not songbird heh maybe anything changed ?18:50
ftaghostcube, probably18:55
ftasongbird 1.4.0~a~svn20090822r14624 vs songbird 1.4.0~a~svn20090822r1462418:55
ftaNo new src snapshot. Skip18:55
ftaso yes, no upstream change18:55
=== OldSchool is now known as they
ftaghostcube, but i will probably stop & orphan it. i'm no longer using it and i don't have time to properly maintain it18:57
ghostcubefta, ok no prob just wanted to mention :)18:58
ftadebian was supposed to take over, they didn't19:00
ftabug 9449419:00
ubottuLaunchpad bug 94494 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Songbird" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/9449419:00
ftahm, debian 41243719:00
ubottuDebian bug 412437 in wnpp "ITP: songbird -- desktop Web player, a digital jukebox and Web browser" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/41243719:00
ghostcubeoo19:02
ghostcubenot possible to get it to experimental ppa from the devel guys ?19:03
ghostcubei mean you have the build up so they could take it19:03
ghostcubeScottK, would thgis be possible19:03
stochasticbdrung, changes pushed to revu19:22
stochasticcan any motu with a spare minute and a kind heart look over http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/xjadeo (I'd love to make feature freeze)19:23
josephpichenot sure where to ask this, but I would like to use launchpad for a stale gpl'd project I will be taking over and co-maintaining with someone, but I'm wondering if launchpad has mailing-lists?20:09
xnoxjosephpiche: wrong chanell =) try #launchpad. And yes it does. It is part of teams feature - that is a team can have a mailing list =)20:12
josephpicheoh, sorry, thanks20:12
zookoHey folks, is there something else that I need to do to get Tahoe-LAFS reviewable on REVU?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/allmydata.org/+bug/417136/comments/320:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 417136 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] please include Tahoe-LAFS in Karmic Koala" [Wishlist,New]20:26
=== ember_ is now known as ember
bdrungstochastic: you have to add cdbs as build dependency and you can drop autoconf (because we do not run autogen any more)20:41
stochasticbdrung, fixing that now.  Thanks.20:41
bdrungstochastic: and you should apply this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/259463/20:42
bdrung(wrong patch direction)20:42
stochasticbdrung, but the licenses are for version 2 or at your option, any later version20:42
stochasticwe discussed this and you said the lintian warning can be ignored20:43
bdrungstochastic: one file is v2 only and therefore is the complete package v2 only20:44
bdrungstochastic: in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ they use the lowest allowed version20:46
stochasticbdrung, debuild is giving me this lintian warning now: E: xjadeo source: no-architecture-field20:46
bdrunge.g.20:46
bdrung    License: GPL-2+20:46
bdrung     On Debian systems the full text of the GNU General Public20:46
bdrung     License can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'20:46
bdrung     file.20:46
james_wzooko: did they first log in to REVU?20:46
stochasticbdrung, okay, I've changed the GPL line20:46
james_wzooko: doing that makes it import the key so that uploads can be checked against it20:46
RainCTHey20:46
james_wzooko: if yes, then the usual issue is a mistake in signing20:47
bdrungstochastic: aha, that was the problem. you need a empty line in the control file after the build-depends20:47
RainCTCan sb remind me whether FF starts *the* 27th or *after* the 27th?20:47
bdrung(to seperate the source part from the binary part)20:47
james_wRainCT: at the start of IIRC20:47
james_wi.e. ~28 hours from now20:48
RainCTOh, so only one day remaining20:48
RainCTok thanks20:48
=== warner_sleep is now known as warner
sebnerjames_w: I thought at the end. As long as somewhere on earth is 27th August. Or was is 26th? Anyways, something with somewhere on earth ^^20:48
bdrungstochastic: i prefer having one build-dependency per line (so it is easier if you have patches), but thats up to you20:49
james_wsebner: that's the release :-)20:49
sebnerjames_w: right, but I'm sure we did that for FF at some point in the past20:49
RainCTbtw, how do I set a spec as postponed?20:49
stochasticbdrung, is there any chance this is going to make Feature Freeze?20:49
sebnerjames_w: as long as it's before FF somewhere on earth new upstream releases can swim in20:49
bdrungstochastic: if you find a motu, then yes.20:50
warnerjames_w: I'm the tahoe uploader.. yes, I'm pretty sure that I first logged into REVU. I know I'm logged in now. It there any way to check that REVU picked up my GPG key from launchpad?20:50
james_whi warner20:50
james_wa revu admin could perhaps do it20:50
james_wwarner: try the upload again now20:50
warnerok20:50
stochasticjames_w do you have time to do a revu of a package?20:50
james_w"dput -f revu whatever_source.changes"20:51
warner-f, right20:51
james_wstochastic: maybe later20:51
RainCTwarner: what's the problem?   /me is a REVU admin20:51
james_wstochastic: what does the package do?20:51
james_wthe more interesting the more likely :-)20:51
warnerRainCT: four packages I uploaded (successfully, it appeared) yesterday didn't show up on the REVU web page20:51
stochasticjames_w, it's a video player that syncs with the Jack audio server to allow soundtrack editors to watch their music in sync with the video20:51
bdrungstochastic: here you have the lintian warning:20:52
bdrungN:    For example, if the package says something like "you may redistribute it20:52
bdrungN:    and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as20:52
bdrungN:    published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your20:52
bdrungN:    option) any later version", the debian/copyright file should refer to20:52
bdrungN:    /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2, not /GPL.20:52
warnerre-uploading "tahoe-lafs" now20:52
RainCTwarner: which ones?20:52
warnertahoe-lafs, python-foolscap, python-zfec, python-pycryptopp20:52
stochasticbdrung, already fixed it and uploaded20:52
james_wstochastic: ok, I'll see if I have time20:52
POX_warner: why didn't you ask me to check them?20:52
warnerPOX_: I didn't see you around :)20:52
stochasticjames_w, thanks.20:53
bdrungstochastic: do you want to maintain this package in debian, too?20:53
warnerPOX_: I've got a git-buildpackage archive for all four if you'd like a copy20:53
POX_warner: just send me RFS mail (as described on the ~piotr/sponsor page)20:53
stochasticbdrung, maybe, I'm not too familiar with debian maintenance though20:53
RainCTbdrung: Er.. Isn't it /GPL-2 when it's "version 2" (without "or later") and either GPL-X or just /GPL at your option when it's "or later"? (that's how I do it)20:53
warnerPOX_: ok, will do. Is that for inclusion in debian or ubuntu? (zooko told me about the upcoming ubunbtu freeze, so I've been focussing on that)20:54
POX_warner: about python-pycryptopp - ping zooko (he's the Debian maintainer, no? :)20:54
warner:)20:54
bdrungRainCT: not any more. the current lintian want versioned gpl links in both cases20:54
POX_that's about Debian only (but then I know who to ask to have it in Ubuntu)20:54
RainCTwarner: no error for any of those here20:54
warnertahoe-lafs reuploaded, now doing foolscap/zfec/pycryptopp20:54
RainCTbdrung: grr, I'll file a bug against it then! :P20:55
bdrung:)20:55
warnerRainCT: huh, I don't see "tahoe" on http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/ , nor on my profile page http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/u/warner20:55
bdrungRainCT: this is the statement from lintian:20:55
bdrungN:    The copyright file refers to the versionless symlink in20:55
bdrungN:    /usr/share/common-licenses for the full text of the GPL, LGPL, or GFDL20:55
bdrungN:    license. This symlink is updated to point to the latest version of the20:55
bdrungN:    license when a new one is released. The package appears to allow20:55
bdrungN:    relicensing under later versions of its license, so this is legally20:55
bdrungN:    consistent, but it implies that Debian will relicense the package under20:55
bdrungN:    later versions of those licenses as they're released. It is normally20:55
bdrungN:    better to point to the version of the license the package references in20:56
bdrungN:    its license statement.20:56
Laneypastebin please20:56
bdrungok, next time20:56
RainCTwarner: are you sure you uploaded to REVU?20:56
warnerUploading to revu (via ftp to revu.ubuntuwire.com):20:57
warner  Uploading zfec_1.4.5-1.dsc: done.20:57
warner..20:57
warnerSuccessfully uploaded packages.20:57
warnerlooks like it :)20:57
RainCTbdrung: so why isn't that an informational warning? they may prefer to do it their way but it's not the lintian maintainer's choice how I'm going to distribute packages :P20:57
warnerI am doing this from a sid box, however. But I added the recommended stanza to my ~/.dput.cf20:58
* RainCT adds to his todo-when-i'm-back-home: "be angry with the lintian guys" :P20:59
RainCTwarner: ah, you've uploaded the _i386.source20:59
warnerI built the packages on a (remote) karmic box, copied them back to my (home) sid system, debsign'ed them, then dput'ed them20:59
bdrungRainCT: it's pedantic20:59
RainCTbdrung: Ah, thought I'd be I: then. No complaints then :)21:00
RainCTwarner: instead of _source.changes21:00
warnerRainCT: zfec and pycryptopp are arch-specific, tahoe and foolscap are not. I *was* wondering why I wound up with "_i386.changes" for everything.. seemed weird.21:00
RainCTwarner: you need to  debuild -S -sa,  then you'll get a _source.changes files21:00
warnerRainCT: does that imply something funny in the way I'm building these files? It didn't create a _source.changes file21:01
warnerah, ok21:01
stochasticbdrung, is that last comment on http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/xjadeo valid?  I thought the new way of doing things was to say Ubuntu-Developers not Ubuntu-MOTU?21:01
RainCTyou get a _<arch>.source when you build the .deb21:01
bdrungstochastic: it's invalid / outdated. so ignore it :)21:01
RainCTand I should really change REVU to  long an error when someone uploads that (or maybe even fix it to work with such updates)21:01
warnerRainCT: ah, I see, so I don't need to build .debs at all (for REVU's purpose), just the source package21:02
RainCTwarner: right21:02
warnerok, I'll spin up my karmic box and rebuild.. should be re-uploaded within the hour21:02
warnerthanks!21:02
RainCTwarner: wait, don't worry21:02
warnerok21:02
RainCTI've just seen that renaming the file to _source it works fine :)21:03
RainCTso I'll just do that for you ;)21:03
warnercool :)21:03
warnertwo of the packages have ITP bugnumbers that should be added, and they all have -1 version numbers (instead of the -0ubuntu1 that I see elsewhere)21:06
warnersometime this afternoon I'll update those21:06
RainCTeven better:   508 Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals   2009-08-25 Process any .changes file instead of only _source ones. TODO: Remove the leftover .deb files.21:09
RainCT_<arch>.source uploads to REVU work now :)21:09
Laneypre-ff sponsor queue review anyone?21:15
ghostcubehi folks https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xine-lib/+bug/15248721:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 152487 in xine-lib "Jack output for xine apps " [Low,Triaged]21:16
ghostcubeis there any news about this21:16
RainCT(ok and .deb files are removed now.. hope I didn't break anything :))21:21
stochasticghostcube, wrong channel, ask in #ubuntu-bugs, but yes, there is a movement to get Jack into main (and thus allow xine to compile against it).  see bug #416778 and add your comments to the listed discussions21:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 416778 in libffado "main inclusion request for libffado" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41677821:23
ghostcubestochastic, thx21:25
zookoWhat's the question for the Debian pycryptopp maintainer?21:27
warneruploading new tahoe-lafs and zfec packages now (added ITP, changed version to -0ubuntu1, upload _source.changes instead of _i386.changes)21:27
zookowarner: :-)  :-)  :-)21:28
ghostcubestochastic, i posted this not beacuse of the bug only because i thought motus may know what changes in the main and universe repo :)21:31
ghostcubebut thx for th elinks i read them and all i would say in my bad english is already written there in a very good english :)21:31
james_wLaney: how about a REVU instead?21:33
warnerRainCT: so, if I'm doing 'debuild -S -sa', does that mean that I won't get lintian reports on problems in the .deb (because it didn't build one)?21:34
* Laney whines21:34
Laneywhich package?21:34
james_wbzr-builder21:34
james_wsmall bzr plugin written by me21:34
james_wI can find someone else if you would rather not21:34
Laneynah I'll do it21:35
james_wah, helps if I actually dput21:37
stochasticif Laney is doing REVUs I want in!21:37
stochastic;)21:37
LaneyI owe james_w lots of favours!21:38
RainCTwarner: right21:38
warnerRainCT: so I should probably build without -S, separately, to learn about lintian problems with the .deb, right?21:42
james_wstochastic, jbernard__: done21:42
stochasticjames_w, thanks, making that change now.21:43
RainCTwarner: Yeah. Well, actually you should build the .deb using some chroot (pbuilder/cowbuilder/whatever. I recommend checking out pbuilder-dist/cowbuilder-dist from ubuntu-dev-tools) to see whether the build dependencies et all are correct21:44
Laneyman21:45
LaneyI kind of wish I went to Forest21:45
stochasticjames_w, changes uploaded21:45
warnerRainCT: yeah, I'm slowly working on a pbuilder setup (I'm using an EC2 host, since I don't have a karmic box at home, so the process is moving somewhat slowly)21:48
Laney:O21:48
RainCTwarner: You don't need a Karmic box for a Karmic pbuilder. That's what's so cool about chroots!21:49
RainCTwarner: "pbuilder-dist karmic create" - (wait up to a couple hours depending on connection speed) - there you go21:49
warnerdoes sid know how to do that?21:50
james_wI believe so21:51
RainCTwarner: Yeah I think I got pbuilder-dist working there. You'll just have to pull it yourself from http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/ubuntu-dev-tools/trunk/files21:51
warnerok, I'll give it a try21:51
Laneyjames_w: do you mean to have that setup.py change in the diff?21:51
james_wyeah, brown paper bag :-)21:52
james_wI made the tarball from the revision before I committed the version number change21:52
Laneyfun21:52
james_wI can release a 0.1.1 if you really want21:52
Laneyno it's not a problem at all21:53
Laneyjust checking you meant it21:53
warnerwhat do I do to pull that, 'bzr clone http://../ubuntu-dev-tools' ?21:54
zookowarner, POX: did you have a question for me as the Debian maintainer of pycryptopp?21:54
Laneywarner: bzr branch lp:ubuntu-dev-tools21:54
warnerLaney: thanks21:54
POX_zooko: yes, your package is outdated in Debian21:54
POX_new upstream release is available, didn't upstream tell you? ;)21:55
zooko:-)21:55
POX_zooko: I think you (as upstream) should slap yourself (as Debian maintainer)! ;)21:56
zookoHeh heh heh.21:56
zookoSo, I'm letting myself off easy, because the only changes to upstream are irrelevant to Debian, as they have to do with the "included bundled convenience copy" of Crypto++, which Debian of course doesn't use.21:57
zookoHm, but there actually is a serious issue here.21:57
warnertahoe-1.5.0 requires a newer version21:57
zookoThe Crypto++ library in Debian has a bad bug if used on ARM architecture.21:57
* zooko looks for a bug report about that.21:57
zookoRight, so the reason that Tahoe-1.5.0 requires the new version is in case someone is using the build of pycryptopp which uses its own bundled copy of Crypto++ (and they are on ARM architecture).21:58
zookoI can see that it would be nice if I uploaded a new pycryptopp to Debian.21:58
zookoI would need a big of hand-holding from POX or warner to accomplish that...21:59
zookoAt the same time, perhaps we could patch Tahoe-LAFS itself to accept pycryptopp-0.5.14 in Debian?21:59
POX_zooko: I will help you tomorrow (you can start with "dch -v 0.5.15-1 -m 'New upstream release'") as I'm working on phatch right now (with stani)21:59
stanisorry zooko ;-)22:00
zookoPOX: thanks!  I'm available around 5:30 UTC-6 until around 7:00 UTC-6 and then around 17:30 UTC-6 to around 21:00 UTC-6 on weekdays.22:00
warnerhm, you mean make the debian patch for tahoe-1.5.0 downgrade the dependency? Not sure if the debian/ubuntu world considers that reasonable or not.22:00
zookowarner: what do you think of relaxing the requirement?22:00
zookoIt seems reasonable to me in this case because the only reason for "pycryptopp >= 0.5.15" is the bug in the included convenience copy of Crypto++.22:01
warnerzooko: I've got an updated pycryptopp package for jaunty and karmic, and I can have a good one for sid by the end of the day (using the "rip out most of setup.py/setup.cfg" technique I wrote about yesterday)22:01
zookoAlthough I guess this should really be fixed by specifying Crypto++ >= 5.6.0 as a *build* dependency for pycryptopp!22:01
zookowarner: that would be great!  Also I would love to get some more education from you on how that is done.22:01
warnerzooko: I wouldn't object to relaxing the requirement, but it feels slightly weird to have the dependencies be non-monotonically increasing. But yeah, the "right way" is to bump the build dependency. I believe it's possible to specify different required versions for different architectures, which might capture the requirement better.22:02
warnerI'll send you mail about the process once I figure it out for myself :)22:02
zookoThat would be interesting -- if on ARM or other CPU without non-aligned load-store, we require Crypto++ >= 5.6.0 as a build-dep.22:03
zookoElse, we require Crypto++ >= 5.5.2 or so.22:03
warnermight make it easier to build for some folks, or on older releases, or something22:03
warnermight just be noisy22:03
zookoAnd, once that build-dep is specified for pycryptopp, then in my opinion Tahoe-LAFS on *Debian/Ubuntu* should require pycryptopp >= 0.5.14.22:03
POX_Debian has libcrypto++ 5.6.0-3 so if you need it, just add versioned build dependency22:04
stochasticjames_w you wouldn't be able to take another look on revu now that the changes you requested have been made, would you?  (let me know if I'm pestering too much)22:04
Laneyjames_w: Looks good. Newer standards-version and maybe consider team maintenance/packaging if you want22:07
Laneyand I can't find anything about pycompat but that might be me22:07
Laneyhappy for you to go ahead22:08
warnerI guess I should set Maintainer: to ubuntu-motu@lists.u.c, and add myself as an XSBC-Original-Maintainer, yeah?22:09
Laneyubuntu-devel-discuss now, I think22:10
warnerok, thanks22:10
c_kornis there a way to execute the config file of debconf if a package is updated ?22:40
c_kornor removed and reinstalled (not purged)22:40
james_wthanks Laney22:40
Laneyno worries22:41
LLStarkshi23:15
=== they is now known as vorian
stochasticjames_w, thanks.23:47
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!