[00:00] (need one night to grab all) :) [00:00] xnox: + 1,2 GiB from my ppas [00:03] * stochastic throws his hands up in a moment of "I give up" frustration, but thanks bdrung_ for all his help thus far. [00:03] yw [00:05] stochastic: the problem is that the patch is already applied to this file [00:06] * stochastic is new to dpatch and doesn't understand what he's done wrong [00:09] stochastic: you could use quilt instead [00:09] stochastic: or if you want a very simple patch system, you could use cdbs + simple-patchsys [00:09] I don't know quilt and the docs said it's much more difficult to setup [00:09] is there something wrong with dpatch? [00:10] stochastic: i don't know if it is dpatch's fault or caused by something else. [00:15] bdrung_ well I guess i have no other option than to give up on this package [00:15] bdrung_ thanks anyway [00:16] stochastic: if you ask me tomorrow i may digg into this issue [00:17] dtchen, thanks for adding ubuntu-devel to the Jack in Main discussion [00:17] stochastic: np === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung [00:29] bdrung, could you test out the latest upload? [00:29] yes [00:32] stochastic: same issue [00:35] stochastic: remove the autogen.sh call. it is not necessary (the configure file exists) [00:39] bdrung, removed and uploaded === ghostcube_ is now known as ghostcube [00:48] stochastic: i have fixed the rebuild bug (i broke the butterfly on the wheel) [01:11] Zhenech: got my mail? [01:28] Hello. I'm having a problem working on a package for a backport to hardy. The upstream tarball requires that I patch up some build requirements in configure.ac and rerun autoconf before the package will build. Does anyone know the correct debian/rules magic for that? [01:39] sbalneav: you have to run autoreconf before you run ./configure [01:40] sbalneav: you may want to use a patch system for the patch [01:40] The package itself uses cdbs [01:41] have you got an example you could point me at? [01:42] sbalneav: for autoconf there are some variables, you could set [01:44] the configure.ac basically defines a couple of "minimum" package levels. The package works fine with older versions, so I just need to bump them down. [01:44] sbalneav: you can set DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF to the version you want [01:45] sbalneav: which package? [01:45] sabayon. [01:46] I've been working getting a version going for karmic, but many people would like a version for hardy. [01:46] I'd like to create a backport in my ppa. [01:51] sbalneav: try to add "DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF := 2.61" to your rules file [01:51] ok === qiyong_ is now known as qiyong === keylocker is now known as leleobhz === jtimberm1n is now known as jtimberman === pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu [06:08] would any motu with a spare minute please glance through http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/xjadeo [06:47] good morning [07:26] good morning dholbach :-) [07:26] hiya fabrice_sp! [07:26] Morning dholbach, fabrice_sp. [07:26] hey iulian [07:26] good morning iulian [07:26] looks like we could do a bit of sponsoring before feature freeze :) [07:27] Indeed. [07:27] speaking about sponsoring :-) [07:27] yes? :) [07:27] about bug #416262 : I don't think aptoncd will make his path to Debian before FF, so I propose to update the package in Ubuntu [07:27] Launchpad bug 416262 in aptoncd "Please update aptoncd to version 0.1.98+bzr112" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/416262 [07:29] it's the same content as the Debian upload, but the package has not being sponsored yet, and I'm travelling this morning, until 3rd of Sptember (Holidays! :-) ) [07:30] fabrice_sp: nice! enjoy your holidays! [07:30] where are you going? [07:33] brb [07:35] hey, quick question. dput reported a successful upload of my four packages (foolscap, zfec, pycryptopp, tahoe) to revu.ubuntuwire.com several hours ago, but I'm not seeing them on the REVU "New Packages" list. Is there anywhere I should look to find out about upload errors? [07:39] dholbach, thanks :-) I'm going to Canary's Island ;-) [07:41] nice :) [07:41] iulian: zooko said I should ping you once the Tahoe packages were uploaded, but I'm not sure if you'll be able to see them yet [07:43] warner: Have you uploaded them to REVU? [07:44] yes, in theory, although I'm not seeing them on http://revu.ubuntuwire.com [07:44] (dput reported success, to the right server) [07:44] jpds: ^^ [07:45] Or any other REVU admin. [07:46] the only thing I can think of is that my launchpad email address is slightly different than the package's debian/changelog's top-most address [07:46] but they're all signed by the same GPG key that I registered with launchpad this afternoon [07:47] warner: Have you logged in to REVU? [07:48] yup, the page says "Logged in as warner." at the top right now [07:49] Hmm, no idea. You'll have to talk to a REVU admin (already pinged one). [07:49] thanks [07:50] iulian: do you know offhand if you or zooko filed ITPs for these packages? I don't know how to search launchpad for them (being more familiar with debian, myself). I don't have proper Closes:/LP: entries in the package changelogs yet. [07:51] warner: I cannot remember, sorry. [07:51] s'ok, thanks [07:51] is there a launchpad ITP page? [07:52] no [07:52] its not structurally different to other bugs [07:52] also ITP is a bit of a buggy concept [07:53] RFP is sensible, as is REVU, but declaring intent... may as well JFDI [07:53] * warner nods [07:53] so the "LP:" entry in the changelog is defined as closing an RFP bug as opposed to an "ITP" bug? [07:54] and such RFP bugs are to be found.. filed under the submitter's proposed package name? [07:54] personally, I don't bother having an initial bug to close. [07:55] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages [07:55] great! I'll ignore that lintian warning then :) [07:55] it says to file one, but like I say.. meh. [07:56] * lifeless waits for the flames [07:56] I'll quote you when the REVU comments start coming in, then :) [07:57] ah, tahoe has a needs-packaging bug filed already, #417136 [07:57] * warner updates the changelog [07:58] right, if there is one definitely close it. [07:58] and zfec has #289430 .. [07:58] But creating a bug saying I'm doing X, only to close it a few minutes later is well... nuts. [07:59] its like writing a note while you do the dishes saying "I'm doing the dishes" [07:59] huh, sounds like twitter :) [07:59] shudder [07:59] so buildbot. Unit tests. [07:59] (I do have the right person don't I?) [08:00] um [08:00] * warner looks shifty [08:00] sure, shoot [08:00] so, have you seen subunit? [08:01] nope [08:01] https://launchpad.net/subunit/ [08:01] project of mine. [08:01] cool. should we take this to #buildbot ? [08:06] huh, weird that the two needs-packaging bugs have numbers that are so far apart [08:17] any emacs fans around? [08:17] hahaha [08:18] oops, did I type that out loud? [08:18] if yes, please package emacs23, using the package from debian before thursday [08:18] lifeless: I bet you did :) [08:34] siretart: Uh huh, did you even read the sync request bug about emacs23 from Debian? [08:51] StevenK: ups? no. do you have the bug no at hand? [08:52] siretart: Bug 408085 [08:52] Launchpad bug 408085 in ubuntu "Sync emacs23 23.1+1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/408085 [08:53] thanks [08:54] StevenK: ah, ok. best would probably be not a plain sync, but a hard dependency on the non-dfsg-free docs (they are fsf-free) [08:55] siretart: Then say so, and deal with the bug [09:32] * SiDi is looking for an Ubuntu maintainer for Exaile, please pm me if you want to help. Thanks in advance. === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [10:55] I know it's a stupid question but, what does MOTU stand for? [10:56] <\sh> sluimers: Masters Of The Universe [10:57] cool, and do they package stuff and put it in the Ubuntu archive? Because that's what it looks like to me. [10:58] Anyway, I have a little problem and I got sent here. [10:59] <\sh> sluimers: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU <- all you need to know about MOTU [11:02] stochastic: i have fixed the rebuild bug (i broke the butterfly on the wheel) [11:02] * sluimers reads some more from MOTU [11:03] stochastic: here is what i did: http://paste.ubuntu.com/259208/ === warner is now known as warner_sleep [11:38] Hello, what happened to python-xml package ? [11:41] It got removed a long time ago IIRC. [11:42] Deleted on 2009-06-08: obsolete and broken; reverse-deps must be migrated to core python modules. LP: #343242 [11:45] geser: thanks [11:47] ah, the bug is still open [11:48] reopened rather [11:48] oh, won't fix === keylocker is now known as leleobhz [12:01] ok, python2.6 would do ! [12:01] thanks [12:06] hi! I'd be interested in feedback on MartinEricRacine/UploadRightsApplication especially on how it's supposed to differ from my previous (succesful) application as ubuntu member. [12:11] is there a reason we dont support lexmark hardware? [12:12] lack of drivers, at a guess? [12:14] thier site doesnt have linux drivers that i can see nor tarball so i am pretty much out of luck? [12:15] very likely. how's the printer db on openprinting look? [12:15] some companies are more pro-linux than others with their printers. lexmark stuggle to be pro-windows, let alone anything else [12:17] maybe ill try nspluginwrapper [12:20] nspluginwrapper? i'm not sure how loading 32-bit flash in 64-bit firefox will help [12:21] which model? http://openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi?make=Lexmark suggests about 50% should work [12:23] x6150 [12:24] directhex: thanks for the link looking at it atm [12:25] no known scanner drivers :( [12:31] directhex: its not nspluginwrapper sorry wrong thing. i cant recall the name of the package im looking for that will run .exe drivers [12:32] gnomefreak, ndiswrapper. note that "ndis" means "Network Driver Interface Specification" [12:34] directhex: yeah i saw that and i remember that is what i used to set up wifi [12:39] error: plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/buil [12:39] der/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder/plugins/builder: Too many levels of symbolic links [12:39] oops [12:42] Oh, dear :) [12:43] directhex: Lexmark used to be /very/ Windows-only, but at some point they started writing and releasing Linux drivers themselves. [12:44] directhex: This must have been in 2001-ish. [12:44] soren: sort of [12:44] atleast i cant find the scanner drivers for it i already have too many printers [12:47] i guess im going to use it on wmy win box and just email it to myself === proppy1 is now known as proppy === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [13:13] anybody have a minute for a review of http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/lazr.restfulclient ? [13:13] needed for the new launchpadlib [13:14] james_w: about bug 416420 [13:14] Launchpad bug 416420 in backport-util-concurrent "Sync backport-util-concurrent 3.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/416420 [13:15] hey ttx [13:15] james_w: hey :) [13:15] james_w: that sounds like a bad idea because it brings all the new maven-repo-helper infra into main, through eucalyptus [13:15] furthermore version 3 is untested [13:15] feel free to back it out [13:16] james_w: how should I proceed to do that ? [13:16] it was ACKed my a MOTU and looked sane, I don't invest any further than that in sync requests [13:16] depends how much you want to revert [13:16] well, going back to where it was 24 hours ago, is it possible ? [13:16] if you just want to go back to the previous package then you can grab that from lp, increment the version with some sort of "really" version number and upload it [13:17] hmmm [13:17] source package is on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-util-concurrent/2.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1 [13:18] I'll try the middle way, try to see if we can work with the new version and just revert the new maven-repo stuff [13:18] if we can't, I'll play the "really" trick [13:18] james_w: thanks [13:21] np [13:21] james_w: The information from README.txt is already included in HACKING.txt. Do you want this? [13:23] iulian: you mean the license text? [13:24] james_w: Yup. [13:24] dropped README.txt [13:26] james_w: Go ahead and upload. [13:26] thanks iulian === freeflyi2g is now known as freeflying [13:43] Unable to start the settings manager 'gnome-settings-daemon'. [13:43] Without the GNOME settings manager running, some preferences may not take effect. This could indicate a problem with Bonobo, or a non-GNOME (e.g. KDE) settings manager may already be active and conflicting with the GNOME settings manager [13:43] Weird. [13:44] Theme changed automatically and when I tried to set it back I got this message. [13:51] james_w: you seems to be missing XS-Python-Version and XB-Python-Version in lazr.restfulclient so it only gets available for python2.6 (see also the depends on python; and the lintian warning) [14:02] thanks geser [14:03] james_w: and the \ in "python setup.py install --root=\$(CURDIR)..." looks also misplaced [14:04] james_w: and I see now that python is twice in Build-Depends [14:13] * hyperair grumbles about liferea being unresponsive and slow [14:14] thanks geser [14:14] hyperair: :( [14:14] pochu: :( [14:14] pochu: it seems to like churning up my hard disk and hanging. [14:17] hyperair: 1.6? [14:19] pochu: ye, 1.6 [14:39] iulian: hello! My partner Brian Warner built Debian packages for Tahoe-LAFS and uploded them to REVU. :-) [14:42] Time for me to walk my children to school... === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung [15:00] Chef and other packages it depends on look to be going into Karmic (uploaded to NEW or already in). Is there a document that describes how to get universe packages backported (I'm willing to do the packaging of course) to LTS and other releases? [15:01] fta: when does youre daily build repo get updated normally for songbird === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks [15:06] !backports | jtimberman [15:06] jtimberman: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging [15:07] Heya gang [15:08] Heya bddebian. [15:08] Hi ScottK [15:09] hi bddebian [15:11] Heya sistpoty|work [15:26] Hey, if a MOTU acks a sync request, why does it still need to be manually reviewed by a Archive Admin? [15:27] what do you mean? [15:27] lfaraone: not reviewed, but processed [15:27] it's a manual process of processing them [15:27] and that involves checking that it has an ACK etc. [15:27] james_w: would it be difficult to create criteria that would make it automagic? [15:27] and sometimes you spot something, and surely it's better to comment then? [15:27] yeah [15:28] the fact that LP doesn't support syncing entirely within LP yet [15:28] manual process of uploading i recall is deliberate. [15:28] at least from the debian side. [15:28] james_w: Well, "if reporter is in MOTU and report is assigned to AA, and is set by member of MOTU to "confirmed""... [15:28] you could cron it, but as we are using bugs there are too many corner cases... [15:30] lfaraone: what about the process bothers you? [15:30] Noob question : if i'm packaging an plugin from an app X that is python based, should i add python to the plugin's deps, knowing that it already depends on X ? [15:30] ivoks, you busy? [15:31] james_w: well, it seems to be inefficient, and I suffer from impatience. (such mundane tasks should, imho, be automated) [15:31] SiDi: Yes. [15:31] lfaraone: yes, they should, and there is work underway to do so [15:36] RoAkSoAx: yes [15:40] lfaraone, okey, thanks [15:40] james_w: Okay. [15:43] POX_: ping [15:43] JontheEchidna: You sent me a contentless ping. This is a contentless pong. Please provide a bit of information about what you want and I will respond when I am around. [15:43] heh [15:44] POX_: Hey, seems kadu ftbfs with the latest gcc. I found a patch here that should fix it: http://starowa.one.pl/~uzi/kadu/kadu-gcc44.patch [15:44] google-translated forum post: http://tinyurl.com/lkthqq [15:50] Hi folks. Is there a bug tag already being used for packages that have unhelpful summaries or descriptions? [15:50] And if not, what would be a good name for this tag? :-) [15:51] mpt: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags [15:51] so no, apparently not [15:52] apart from 'string-fix', tangentially [15:52] that would work [15:52] and 'desktop-file', for applications [15:53] though it may be more of "rewrite the description" rather than "it should be theirs and not there's" [15:53] mpt: 'unhelpful' would be a good name, but i'm sure that's not PC ;) [15:53] why not? [15:53] "unhelpful-description" if you want to avoid every bug being tagged that :-) [15:54] Actually I was thinking of spelling/grammar/layout errors as well [15:54] james_w: something about not being positive enough [15:55] mpt: string-fix would seem to be appropriate then [15:55] "description" would be a bit too specific, but "metadata" would be too vague [15:55] I thought you were looking more specifically [15:55] huhu siretart, I already found a sponsor, DktrKranz will make use of his new DD powers :) [15:56] DktrKranz: congrats :-) [15:56] sistpoty|work: :-) [15:58] siretart: thanks :) [15:58] I'm not the only MOTU to cheer ;) [15:59] sistpoty|work: btw, if you're in a hurry, please go ahead :) [15:59] DktrKranz: no, I'm not in a hurry :) [16:01] JontheEchidna: kadu should work fine with GCC 4.4 since 0.6.5.2-2 (dunno what version Ubuntu has). BTW: patryk is now a DD so I no longer sponsor kadu [16:01] what are we congratulating DktrKranz for? [16:01] please ask for a sync with Debian [16:01] Laney: he's a DD now [16:02] DktrKranz, congrats! :) [16:02] do not forget pochu, he's DD too [16:02] oh, nice! [16:02] congrats, pochu! [16:02] and direc, no, wait :( [16:03] sponsor stuff plz [16:03] yeah, DktrKranz is the new debian mono & haskell sponsor! [16:03] sistpoty|work, Laney: ty! [16:03] directhex: maybe mono gets you penalties in NM :P [16:03] for person in motu_list if DD=yes then congratulations. :-) [16:04] directhex: haha [16:04] sistpoty|work, i'd need to check the list of current front desk people to know how much reality matches that [16:04] heh [16:04] schestow...oh crap [16:04] dholbach: ping [16:05] porthose: thanks [16:05] :) [16:05] congrats DktrKranz [16:06] hey RoAkSoAx, thanks [16:06] slytherin: pong [16:06] does anyone have some time to revu libcgroup (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libcgroup)? [16:06] RoAkSoAx: btw, advocated lekhonee === sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | Development of Karmic Koala has started -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ . Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) is now officially Debian Developer! HUG HIM! [16:07] dholbach: ttf-indic-fonts needs a merge. One of the fonts have been deemed non-free and removed from the package. I would do it myself but I do not have good understanding of package structure. [16:07] DktrKranz: congratulations! mauahahahaha [16:07] DktrKranz, yeah I saw it, thanks a lot!! I'm on my search for another advocator :) [16:07] slytherin: hum... can you have a chat with ArneGoetje about that? [16:07] Via email? [16:08] as he's based in Taiwan he might be off the internet now [16:08] DktrKranz: Congrats. [16:08] dholbach: I will try the merge on weekend then. [16:08] sebner: thanks, but no need a topic for that (and you forgot emilio, btw) [16:08] POX_: We synced -4, still fails [16:08] slytherin: super, thanks [16:09] POX_: thanks for the heads up about maintainership, tho [16:10] DktrKranz: your idea, your fault :P emilio? [16:10] so yeah [16:11] about goocanvasmm in pkg-gnome svn... ;) [16:11] sebner: my idea? :P... pochu is DD too [16:11] DktrKranz: Oh really? I have to send new emails too to the dev-lists :P [16:11] LOL [16:13] congrats DktrKranz [16:13] sebner: no need for it :) [16:14] pochu: upps, just sent the mails :P Congrats also from me [16:15] thanks :) hope to see you in the queue at som epoint ;) === sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | Development of Karmic Koala has started -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ . Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) and Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | Development of Karmic Koala has started -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved [16:15] pochu: too late :P [16:15] DktrKranz: you're released! \o/ [16:15] * cody-somerville hugs pochu and DktrKranz. [16:16] sebner: I have to find a good hideout now :) [16:16] pochu: DM at some point this year [16:16] DktrKranz: yeah, mail replies are starting \o/ [16:16] sebner: party, yohoo! [16:16] congrats pochu [16:17] I never saw the mail on debian-newmaint [16:17] where was it announced? [16:17] topic> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ . Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) and Jaunty is released [16:17] maybe it's not yet [16:17] alreet [16:17] Laney: you got a welcome mail once your account is created [16:17] *get [16:18] ah [16:18] s/welcome/2_pages_long_here_what_you_have_do_to/ [16:18] DktrKranz, pochu: Congratulations. [16:19] thanks dholbach iulian! [16:19] thanks guys [16:20] pochu: they probably mean s/thanks/sponsor me something/ :) [16:21] =) [16:21] thanks, now get to work reviewing my packages! [16:22] * Laney cracks the whip [16:22] * sebner asks himself if he should change the topic to: New Debian Sponsors: pochu and DktrKranz :O [16:30] sebner: can you sanitize and clean up the topic a little bit, now that you're the last one you touched it? (e.g. you could mention that we're all doomed, err that FF starts on Thursday) [16:31] sistpoty|work: haha! uiuiui, really doomed. I'm sorry [16:31] sebner: just guessing on the rate of "just before feature freeze" breakage :P [16:32] topic is a bit of a mess isn't it === sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty is released | Time for SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | We are nearing Feature Freeze for Karmic (27th August) | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ [16:32] excellent! [16:32] thanks sebner [16:33] sistpoty|work: thanks for the hint. /me was just too excited xD [16:33] * DktrKranz can now hide [16:33] sebner: sure, no problem, I just thought that also the old topic could need cleanup :) [16:34] Jaunty is released? [16:34] sistpoty|work: 2 Fliegen mit einer Klappe ^^ [16:34] old news int it? [16:34] Laney: still the actual release though [16:34] and we want SRU'S [16:35] don't think it's topic worthy === sebner changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Jaunty SRUs: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/sru/ | We are nearing Feature Freeze for Karmic (27th August) | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ [16:36] * sebner hides now [16:37] * Laney wonders why that links is in the topic at all [16:37] seems only motu-sru would want to use it [16:37] * sebner didn't set it :) [16:37] infact both of the main links go to a blank page [16:38] * Laney would link to sponsor queue, debcheck, uehs === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl [16:38] Laney: just do it :P [16:38] I somehow broke my irssi [16:38] so I can't tab complete the topic === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Karmic Feature Freeze this Thursday (27th August) | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://is.gd/2y76G | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck [16:41] rawr [16:43] Looks better now. [16:48] kklimonda: ping [16:49] kklimonda: you uploaded a SRU for zabbix? there's no patch on the bug report and no motu-sru approval [16:49] mok0: bug 271260 :) [16:49] Launchpad bug 271260 in ubuntu "Sahana - disaster management application - for inclusion to repos - help reqd" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/271260 [16:49] mok0: didn't know there was somebody interested in packaging sahana as well [16:54] riddell: hmm.. there were two similar bugs and I think I have prepared a single debdiff that fixed both of them. [16:55] kklimonda: the only thing in the changelog is " * debian/zabbix-server-{mysql,pgsql}.zabbix-server.init: - Create pid directory in /var/run on start (LP: #172775)" [16:56] and indeed that's the only change in the debdiff [16:56] riddel: oh, wait - i have no upload rights so i havent uploaded it. ;) [16:59] i don't know what got uploade to be honest as I'm out of town for the last week or so. I remember getting an email from LP about it and that's it. if you could say what's wrong I'd appreciate it. :) [17:02] is there a special procedure for transferring a conffile from one package to another? [17:07] kklimonda: what's wrong is the lack of patch or motu-sru approval on bug 172775 [17:07] Launchpad bug 172775 in zabbix "/var/run/zabbix-server deleted after reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172775 [17:09] no, not any more apparently [17:09] kklimonda: looks like Devid Antonio Filoni uploaded it [17:10] riddel: i agree that i should probably attach patch to both bugs, i thoght that as they are similar it would be easier to work on both of them in one bug. [17:11] kklimonda: I have no idea what the other bug is [17:12] as for the lack of sru ack I kow about it, I was talking with on of motu-sru guys about it but hwe had some concerns and then had to go before i've managed to explain them. But I haven't uploaded them myself, actually I wouldn't do it without a sru ack. [17:14] kklimonda: so what is this other bug which is so similar? [17:14] bug 96644 [17:14] Launchpad bug 96644 in zabbix "zabbix_agentd will not start after reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/96644 [17:16] kklimonda: right, that's what I need to know. I'll accept the package [17:16] kklimonda: according to the signature it was "Devid Antonio Filoni" who uploaded your changes [17:17] is there any chance that i can get my package into karmic? [17:17] or should i not even try getting into the game this late === vorian is now known as OldSchool === hanska is now known as Guest70049 [17:29] how can i set the default key for signing debian packages? === Guest70049 is now known as hanska [17:31] prefrontal: it depends on the state of package. feature freeze is on 27th August. [17:31] bdrung: set environment variable DEBEMAIL to the email address of your key. [17:32] slytherin: i have two key that fit the DEBEMAIL [17:32] then I don't know the solution. [17:32] bdrung: /etc/devscripts.conf I think [17:33] DEBSIGN_KEYID=whatever [17:33] bdrung: DEBSIGN_KEYID [17:34] slytherin, alright i will give it a shot.. and try to make it perfect ;) [17:37] jmarsden: thanks, that works. [17:37] bdrung: No problem. [17:45] i uploaded libcgroup (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libcgroup) to REVU, if anyone has some cycles to review it I'd be very grateful === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [18:04] jtimberman: chef should point to /usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0 in its copyright file [18:06] Riddell: is that blocking? [18:06] jtimberman: no I've accepted it [18:06] but fix it for next upload [18:06] Riddell: Definitely! Thank you. [18:07] Riddell: Won't be long, we're preparing to release 0.7.10 "soon" :-) [18:46] ghostcube, daily :) [18:47] ghostcube, ... about 5pm UTC [18:48] fta, last update is from saturday [18:49] thats why i asked about :) [18:50] cause ff anbd tb are pushing dailies into my apt but not songbird heh maybe anything changed ? [18:55] ghostcube, probably [18:55] songbird 1.4.0~a~svn20090822r14624 vs songbird 1.4.0~a~svn20090822r14624 [18:55] No new src snapshot. Skip [18:55] so yes, no upstream change === OldSchool is now known as they [18:57] ghostcube, but i will probably stop & orphan it. i'm no longer using it and i don't have time to properly maintain it [18:58] fta, ok no prob just wanted to mention :) [19:00] debian was supposed to take over, they didn't [19:00] bug 94494 [19:00] Launchpad bug 94494 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Songbird" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/94494 [19:00] hm, debian 412437 [19:00]