| jcastro | fta: big gwibber merge happening rsn, shouldn't break dailies but just to let you know | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| fta | jcastro, let's hope so, i don't have much time to fix it if it does | 00:21 |
| jcastro | ok | 00:21 |
| fta | is the one with the ui and the daemon? | 00:21 |
| jcastro | yeah | 00:22 |
| fta | cool | 00:23 |
| [reed] | mozilla bug 512575 | 00:29 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 512575 in Widget: Gtk "Switching out of fullscreen mode and alt-tabbing puts me back in fullscreen mode" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512575 | 00:29 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| === jtv1 is now known as jtv | ||
| === e-jat is now known as ejat | ||
| plasticmillion | does anyone know what the situation is with branded Firefox 3.5 on Ubuntu? | 11:43 |
| plasticmillion | if I pull 1.9.1 and set the config flag for official branding, will I get a branded Firefox? | 11:43 |
| plasticmillion | and when will the official Firefox be 3.5? | 11:43 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: it will have official branding in Karmic but Jaunty will not change | 11:43 |
| plasticmillion | gnomefreak: and can I simply build my own? | 11:44 |
| plasticmillion | someone told me that there are changes in the sources so that 1.9.1 doesn't build as Firefox even if the build is set to use official branding | 11:44 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: if you wish but "simply" is not the same for everyone | 11:44 |
| plasticmillion | but I haven't confirmed that myself | 11:44 |
| plasticmillion | gnomefreak: well building Firefox is not a problem | 11:45 |
| plasticmillion | is there something different on Ubuntu from other platforms? | 11:45 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: feel free to build it but we can not support it officially | 11:45 |
| plasticmillion | ok fair enough | 11:45 |
| plasticmillion | just out of curiosity, why is 3.5 not being supported on Jaunty? | 11:45 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: i dont know what other platforms you mean/ | 11:45 |
| plasticmillion | well I have more experience building on OS X and Windows | 11:45 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: it is supported in Jaunty but the branding is staying as is | 11:46 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: than yes it is different | 11:46 |
| plasticmillion | gnomefreak: what differences specifically? | 11:46 |
| plasticmillion | I mean I build Firefox on Ubuntu all the time but I haven't tried it with official branding | 11:46 |
| plasticmillion | I just build Minefield or Shiretoko | 11:46 |
| * plasticmillion hopes he got that right | 11:46 | |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: you need to change braning in the /debian/ dir. off hand i dont remember what is in rules and *links | 11:47 |
| plasticmillion | gnomefreak: is there any documentation? | 11:47 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: as i recall you need to add the build option in rules. you should be able to get the build option from 3.0 that you need to add | 11:49 |
| plasticmillion | --enable-official-branding probably | 11:49 |
| plasticmillion | okay well let me try it then... maybe I was misinformed | 11:49 |
| gnomefreak | - debian/rules: Added build option --enable-official-branding to build with official branding | 11:49 |
| gnomefreak | that is my sunbird change | 11:49 |
| plasticmillion | okay, and that will give me Firefox then | 11:49 |
| plasticmillion | (not IceWeasel or whatever) | 11:49 |
| gnomefreak | we dont package ice* | 11:50 |
| plasticmillion | ok | 11:50 |
| gnomefreak | plasticmillion: you may also what to change the icon it uses either in rules and links files (i cant recall if FF uses a rule to change icon in rules file | 11:51 |
| gnomefreak | )* | 11:51 |
| plasticmillion | cool... thanks | 11:52 |
| gnomefreak | np | 11:53 |
| gnomefreak | bug 326897 | 13:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 326897 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox-3.0.5 crashes when drag-dropping folder bookmark sidebar" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/326897 | 13:07 |
| gnomefreak | !info firefox-3.5 intrepid | 13:07 |
| ubottu | Package firefox-3.5 does not exist in intrepid | 13:07 |
| gnomefreak | bug 419177 | 13:22 |
| gnomefreak | damn bot | 13:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 419177 in firefox-3.0 "vertical scrolling stops on some forum pages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/419177 | 13:25 |
| jdstrand | fta: hi! I was wondering on the status of https://code.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/firefox/firefox-3.5-apparmor/+merge/10109? | 15:01 |
| bucket529 | I need a bit of help with a Brainstorm idea: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/21163/ (Popup help to install a Flash player). Is this reasonable? Already implemented? Considered and rejected? | 15:02 |
| fta | jdstrand, i'll have a look later today (after work), sorry, it passed below my radar | 16:08 |
| fta | bucket529, it's already in ubufox | 16:09 |
| jdstrand | fta: thanks :) | 16:14 |
| bucket529 | fta: OK, already implemented, thanks. | 16:47 |
| ejat | fta : http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20045 <-- no updates at all :( | 17:10 |
| fta | ejat, are you sure you have the same problem? | 17:11 |
| fta | ejat, does it crash for you? i mean, not the whole browser, jsut the plugin process. you should have a fresh /var/crash/_usr_lib_chromium-browser_chromium-browser.*.crash | 17:26 |
| DanaG | Hmm, how do I get Firefox not to try to do the profile migration? I want to have both the firefox dir and the firefox-3.5 dir point at the same actual profile, for when I boot Jaunty... but each time I start it, it insists on bringing up the migrator. | 19:47 |
| micahg | DanaG: that is not a good idea | 19:48 |
| micahg | what 3.5 does to a profile is not guaranteed to work with 3.0 | 19:48 |
| DanaG | What i mean is, firefox 3.5 in jaunty uses the firefox-3.5 dir, not the "firefox" dir. | 20:31 |
| DanaG | Unless there's now a backport. | 20:32 |
| micahg | no, that's correct | 20:35 |
| micahg | it's also not advisable to go between Ubuntu versions | 20:35 |
| micahg | as plugins and libraries will be different | 20:35 |
| DanaG | It's worked fine in the past. I just want to get rid of that migrator. | 20:36 |
| DanaG | I'll deal with any other brokenness myself -- and not file bugs on it, as of course it'll be my fault. | 20:36 |
| DanaG | Oh yeah, and when I had the firefox-3.5 dir be a symlink to the firefox dir, it moved it, so I had a symlink pointing at itself. | 20:37 |
| micahg | so, it prompts you for the migrator every time? | 20:54 |
| DanaG | Yeah, because anything but "ask me later" moves files around. | 20:54 |
| DanaG | It'll either make a firefox-3.0-replaced, or a firefox-3.5-abandoned. | 20:55 |
| micahg | DanaG: please file a bug in firefox-3.5, I believe this should only happen once, but our main developer is on vacation | 20:56 |
| micahg | we'll take a look next week | 20:56 |
| DanaG | hmm, I'll file it this evening, when I get a chance. | 20:56 |
| micahg | great, thanks | 20:56 |
| DanaG | Hmm, what should it be about? The lack of a "don't touch my files" option? | 20:58 |
| DanaG | The specific wording is: | 20:59 |
| DanaG | summary, rather: "Do you want to import [firefox 3.0], replacing [firefox 3.5 alpha/beta]?" | 20:59 |
| DanaG | buttons: keep 3.5, decide later, import settings. | 20:59 |
| micahg | DanaG: I would think the fact that it runs more than once is the actual bug | 21:05 |
| micahg | per user that is | 21:05 |
| DanaG | I'd tried moving the firefox-3.5-abandoned back to firefox-3.5, and it reran the migrator. | 21:06 |
| micahg | right | 21:07 |
| micahg | so, I think that's the bug, that it runs multiple times | 21:07 |
| BUGabundo | ola | 21:58 |
| binarymutant | hiya, I'm running Songbird-1.2.0 and was wondering what all the talk about xulrunner needing to be patched is about, as I haven't seen anything too buggy :/ | 22:09 |
| micahg | binarymutant: songbird uses a custom version of xulrunner | 22:11 |
| micahg | that's why we can't include it in ubuntu | 22:11 |
| binarymutant | ah okay, thanks for clearing that up for me :) | 22:12 |
| binarymutant | does anyone know which songbird bug I should follow on their bts? | 22:40 |
| fta | binarymutant, what for? | 22:43 |
| binarymutant | the "songbird uses a custom version of xulrunner" | 22:43 |
| fta | the ubuntu bug is linked to the upstream bug | 22:44 |
| binarymutant | ah ty :D <-- blind | 22:44 |
| fta | hm, not the right one | 22:45 |
| fta | I'm not sure their is one then.. | 22:46 |
| fta | stevel, Mook_sb, ^^ | 22:46 |
| binarymutant | "Please package Songbird into a .deb file and get it included in the official Ubuntu repository." that's not really a bug... :/ | 22:47 |
| binarymutant | ah | 22:47 |
| bdrung | binarymutant: but ubuntu handles that as bugs, too. | 22:54 |
| binarymutant | bdrung, I'm not sure I understand :D | 22:55 |
| bdrung | binarymutant: it's a "need-packaging" bug :) | 22:56 |
| bdrung | binarymutant: in debian is it a itp (intend to package) bug | 22:56 |
| binarymutant | bdrung, upstream shouldn't handle that bug I wouldn't think the "please package songbird" bug. But what about the xulrunner bug? I'm guessing because songbird uses a lower version than the one in karmic | 22:56 |
| bdrung | binarymutant: yes, that shouldn't be forwarded to upstream | 22:57 |
| binarymutant | ah it was :/ | 22:57 |
| binarymutant | I'm just wondering where the bug that keeps songbird out of the repos is | 22:59 |
| micahg1 | binarymutant: it's discussed in the debian and ubuntu bugs | 23:01 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| micahg | getdeb.net has packages | 23:02 |
| Mook_sb | hmm, I'm unaware of the upstream bug to suck less on the XR front | 23:03 |
| binarymutant | Mook_sb, I couldn't find one | 23:04 |
| stevel | i don't think we have one :( | 23:08 |
| * stevel goes to file one | 23:08 | |
| stevel | http://bugzilla.songbirdnest.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17708 | 23:10 |
| ubottu | bugzilla.songbirdnest.com bug 17708 in Platform: XULRunner "[xr] Upstream all XULRunner patches" [Major,New] | 23:10 |
| binarymutant | stevel, ty :D | 23:11 |
| micahg | [reed]: do you have any idea where the code for mozilla bug 488605 is? | 23:13 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 488605 in General "XMLHTTPRequest Randomly Fails with Status Code 0 During Reload/Refresh and/or Multiple Requests" [Critical,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488605 | 23:13 |
| mconnor | micahg: see Smaug's comments | 23:14 |
| micahg | yes, but I don't know how to find it in the code base based on that comment | 23:15 |
| micahg | can I do a code search on mozilla-0central? | 23:16 |
| Mitch | micahg: http://mxr.mozilla.org/ | 23:16 |
| mconnor | sure can | 23:16 |
| micahg | mconnor: Nice :) | 23:16 |
| micahg | thanks Mitch | 23:19 |
| micahg | I think I found it | 23:19 |
| micahg | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/src/nsUpdateService.js.in#2243 | 23:19 |
| mconnor | um | 23:19 |
| micahg | no? | 23:19 |
| mconnor | that's code specific to the update service | 23:20 |
| micahg | oh | 23:20 |
| micahg | oops | 23:20 |
| micahg | guess I should look in which file I'm in... | 23:20 |
| mconnor | yes... | 23:20 |
| micahg | this seems better: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/content/base/src/nsXMLHttpRequest.cpp#1226 | 23:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!