[01:53] <DanaG> hmm, I added new comments to this bug, about xsplash (which is partly an artwork thing, isn't it?):
[01:53] <DanaG> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/412598
[01:53] <DanaG> Current behavior: usplash -> xsplash (brown) -> gdm (blue) -> xsplash (brown) -> gdm (blue) -> user-desktop.
[01:53] <DanaG> Better behavior:   usplash -> xsplash (brown) -> gdm (blue) -> xsplash (blue) -> user-desktop.
[13:44] <natewiebe13> so today is artwork first drop.. what exactly happens?
[13:47] <thorwil> artwork is dropped on the floor and mat_t picks up the pieces, i think
[13:48] <natewiebe13> haha
[13:50] <thorwil> i admit to not knowing any more than what is written at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkFirstDrop
[13:50] <natewiebe13> okay.. thanks
[13:51] <natewiebe13> thorwil: supposedly there was an update on the splash this morning..
[13:53] <natewiebe13> thorwil: have you updated yet?
[13:53] <thorwil> no, i'm not following karmic
[13:54] <natewiebe13> okay.. if you want i'll let you know if anything changes (im updating right now)
[13:59] <SiDi> natewiebe13, yeh but the floor is a grid-like floor so if your artwork is tight, it might fall below and not get picked!
[13:59]  * SiDi goes bed
[14:03] <thorwil> bad SiDi
[14:03] <SiDi> bad thorwil !
[14:05] <thorwil> papa-pa-papa-pam, da-papa-dam, papa-dapadapa-pam
[14:06] <mat_t> thorwil: I'll leave picking to Ken this time I guess ;)
[14:07] <SiDi> mat_t, see, he's so evil that he waited for you to answer for leaving just before !
[14:07] <SiDi> That phrase doesn't make sense in English.
[14:07] <mat_t> SiDi: bugger, indeed
[14:17] <natewiebe13> anyone know where to discuss xsplash?
[14:39] <mac_v> mat_t: i do not mention to use 2 backgrounds! ,rather just one!
[14:40] <mat_t> mac_v: you proposed using one pre-gdm and one post-gdm
[14:40] <mat_t> mac_v: didn't you?
[14:40] <mac_v> mat_t: nope , pls recheck the description ;0
[14:41]  * mat_t rechecks
[14:42] <mat_t> mac_v: right, sorry
[14:42] <mac_v> mat_t: thanks :)
[14:42] <mat_t> mac_v: still, we got that covered :) So I marked invalid so that Cody can sleep tonight ;)
[14:42] <mac_v> mat_t: lol sure , no probs, i started the bug long back ;)
[14:43] <mat_t> cool
[14:44] <mac_v> mat_t: i'll just copy paste this irc chat, so that other are aware :)
[14:45]  * kwwii_ is back at home now, working tomorrow
[14:46] <mat_t> mac_v: not a big fan of irc chats in bug reports
[14:46] <mat_t> mac_v: just write a normal comment pls
[14:46] <mac_v> mat_t: ok , wont do it , sure
[14:46] <mat_t> thx
[14:46]  * mac_v grumbles , mat_t making me type ;p
[14:47]  * mat_t takes sweet revenge
[14:49] <mac_v> kwwii_: hi... take rest... i'll bug you tomorrow , with a couple of things ;)
[14:54] <kwwii_> ;)
[17:18] <FLOZz> Hello all  _o/
[17:49] <mac_v> andreasn_: hi... small doubt , how do i convert a several svg to a gif animation?
[17:49] <andreasn_> are you sure you want a gif? perhaps better to go for a apng?
[17:50] <mac_v> apng ? hmm or did you mean png?
[17:50] <andreasn> apng, I wonder if we can render those though, or if that's only gecko
[17:51] <andreasn> the way we did the spinner and some animations in packagekit is to do still frames in a grid
[17:51] <mac_v> andreasn: this is for software store , there seems to want to do it like firefox , not want but one person is contributing to the code using firefox's method , which uses gif
[17:52] <mac_v> s/there seems/they seem
[17:52] <mac_v> i think nautilus way of using png would be better? wouldnt it?
[17:52] <andreasn> well, both methods work
[17:53] <andreasn> gif puts a 256 indexed color limit upon you
[17:53] <mac_v> ;) or should i say easier for me to do ;p
[17:53] <mac_v> gif ah ha.. right i forgot
[17:56] <andreasn> ah, right. Firefox used to do throbber.gif, but for 3.0+ it uses /toolkit/themes/gnomestripe/global/icons/loading_16.png
[17:56] <andreasn> anyway, that requires support for animated png's
[17:56] <andreasn> drifting off, sorry
[17:57] <andreasn> the way I would do it is to export the stills from Inkscape and then put them together in GIMP
[17:57] <mac_v> that was what i was thinking , of doing
[17:58] <andreasn> if you want to do a apng, there is a firefox extension that can create those
[17:59]  * mac_v googles
[18:05] <mac_v> andreasn: does firefox 3.0 use apng or ...? i'm asking because the image is labeled .png
[18:05] <andreasn> yes, it's called png, but it's animated
[18:05] <andreasn> it's the throbber that animates when you're loading a page
[18:06] <mac_v> andreasn: ah... thanx i suggest it to rugby , i always wondered how the png was throbbing ;)
[18:08] <mac_v> andreasn: was this the addon you mentioned? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5519 or it there a better one?
[18:08] <andreasn> yes, that's the one
[18:08] <andreasn> but it's not that good :/
[18:08] <mac_v> andreasn: thanx again :)
[18:09] <mac_v> andreasn: huh? , then how do i get a good output?
[18:09] <andreasn> oh, it works, but it's a bit hard to work with some times
[18:09] <andreasn> but it does the trick
[18:10] <mac_v> hehe... i'll test it then
[19:37] <FLOZz> Bye
[20:12] <natewiebe13> anyone know whats going on with todays art drop?
[20:16] <natewiebe13> xsplash was updated.. it looks good besides the throbber moving in the wrong direction.. and after i changed the background
[20:16] <natewiebe13> im glad the ubuntu logo isnt white like in the demo mockups