=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
[03:35] <AnnonyMouse> hi guys. did an update to my thunderBird last week, & since then my header info bar has dissapeared
[03:35] <AnnonyMouse> any ideas?
[03:36] <micahg> hmmm
[03:37] <micahg> which header info bar/
[03:39] <AnnonyMouse> on my mail view window/pane (below my subject/sender/date list), where it shows the msg, that bar that shows the header info, like the subject, date, sender, tags, etc
[03:40] <micahg> it shouldn't have changed it
[03:40] <micahg> did you check your settings under View
[03:41] <AnnonyMouse> yea. been through it all. think it may be a bug or bad update.
[03:41] <AnnonyMouse> Eventually I'll migrate to TB 3, but this is just a tad annoying for now
[03:42] <micahg> AnnonyMouse: maybe try reinstalling the package?
[03:44] <AnnonyMouse> yea.... was really hoping it was a simple setting so that I can avoid having to do that. will have to do a complete purge & reinstall, and may end up being a bigger complication than just living withthe bug...
[03:45] <micahg> nah, just reinstall the package in synaptic
[03:45] <micahg> it won't affect your profile
[03:46] <AnnonyMouse> aptitude reinstall u recon?
[03:46] <micahg> yeah
[03:46] <micahg> try that
[03:47] <AnnonyMouse> i should probably move 2 evolution @ some point....
[03:47] <micahg> why?
[03:47] <micahg> TB is nice :)
[03:47] <AnnonyMouse> yea... i rly like it. been using it 4 ages...
[03:47] <AnnonyMouse> like the fact that I can use many FF plugins too
[03:47] <micahg> yep
[03:47] <AnnonyMouse> (except NoScript)
[03:48] <micahg> just disable HTML by default
[03:48] <AnnonyMouse> pity about mailbox.inc
[03:48] <AnnonyMouse> i use TB to read my RSS's
[03:48] <micahg> Ah, I used to do that
[03:48] <micahg> TB3 fixed some bugs with that
[03:49] <micahg> ok, I have to go, I'll be back on in a couple of hours if you're still having trouble
[03:49] <AnnonyMouse> i should b fine, thnx
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
[16:04] <micahg> fta: how can I test a build of firefox-3.7.head?
[16:35] <fta2> micahg, er? not sure i understand. why not install the one from the ppa?
[16:36]  * micahg is testing a change for a bug fix
[16:37] <fta2> a fix not in the branch?
[16:38] <micahg> yes
[16:43] <fta2> branch the branch, add your stuff on top and bzr bd --merge it
[16:49] <micahg> I branched to a local copy
[16:50] <micahg> but I"m wondering how to build/get the orig.tar.gz
[16:51] <micahg> I think the problem is I'm trying to build using yesterday's tarball
[16:52] <micahg> ugh
[16:52] <micahg> why does it keep tryinig to upload a 34MB tarball?
[16:53] <micahg> nevermind
[16:54] <micahg> that's the directory
[16:54] <micahg> ok, I'm hoping it works now
[16:54] <micahg> I wanted to test the patch before merging
[16:54] <micahg> s/patch/fix/
[16:55] <fta2> get the last tarball from the ppa, and update your local changelog accordingly
[16:56] <micahg> I linked the mozilla daily ppa as a dependency
[16:56] <fta2> why are you uploading?
[16:56] <micahg> need a test build
[16:56] <micahg> don't want to build locally
[16:56] <fta2> oh
[16:56] <micahg> created a new mozilla test ppa
[16:56] <micahg> for me
[16:57] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test
[16:57] <fta2> i have 2 bzr aliases for that
[16:57] <fta2> bzr alias ppa="bd --merge --build-dir=../ppa --orig-dir=../tarballs/ --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa -kB6EE20E8'"
[16:57] <fta2> bzr alias ppa2="bd --merge --build-dir=../ppa --orig-dir=../tarballs/ --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sd -kB6EE20E8'"
[16:58] <fta2> i do bzr ppa to create a package with the tarball
[16:58] <fta2> and bzr ppa2 when i don't need to push the tarball
[16:58] <fta2> -sa vs -sd
[16:58] <micahg> I'm hoping that linked the mozilla daily ppa will keep me from needing the tarballs
[16:58] <fta2> then i dput the *changes from ../ppa
[17:02] <micahg> what does bd --merge do?
[17:03] <fta2> it merges the debian dir with the tarball to create the proper directory, then you can build or create a source package from there
[17:04] <fta2> the branch is not enough as it doesn't contain the sources
[17:06] <micahg> ah, where do I get bdd?
[17:07] <micahg> bd?
[17:07] <fta2> bzr-builddeb
[17:08] <fta2> i think asac made a tutorial once
[17:08] <micahg> ok
[17:08] <micahg> cool
[17:08] <fta2> look at the classroom minutes
[17:08] <micahg> but I'm still hoping I don't need the tarballs :)
[17:09] <fta2> you need to have it locally, but you should not need to upload it
[17:11] <micahg> I'll find out in an hour
[17:12] <micahg> I managed to upload my branch to LP last night
[17:31] <micahg> fta, you're correct of course, I'll have to play with bd later
[19:31] <jcastro> fta: around?
[19:40] <fta> jcastro, yes
[19:40] <jcastro> fta: nm, figured it out
[19:48] <fta> jcastro, i see some patches landed in the gwibber packaging branch, is it ready? should I respin the dailies?
[19:50] <jcastro> fta: doesn't hurt to try
[20:01] <fta> [reed], is modules/distribution.js gone?
[20:02] <[reed]> not sure
[20:04] <fta> jcastro, hm, my bot says there's no change. did someone move the branch(es)?
[20:04] <fta> [reed], my build failed today: dh_install: firefox-3.7 missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/firefox-*/modules/), aborting
[20:04] <[reed]> hmm
[20:05] <jcastro> fta: ah, I don't think lp:gwibber is pointing to the new stuff yet
[20:05] <fta> [reed], yesterday, there was just /usr/lib/firefox-3.7a1pre/modules/distribution.js
[20:05] <jcastro> fta: lp:gwibber/trunk
[20:07] <fta> jcastro, hm, the packaging uses lp:gwibber
[20:08] <Mook_sb> fta: did you mean .jsm? the .js lives in components/ (and appears to be gone)
[20:09] <fta> Mook_sb, eh? my error is when building ff trunk, not songbird
[20:10] <Mook_sb> fta: yes, and I was referring to browser/ in m-c :)
[20:10] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[20:10] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/1192135
[20:15] <fta> between r32030 and r31978
[20:17] <fta> [reed], ^^
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
[20:26] <fta> [reed], something's wrong
[20:27] <fta> [reed], search for "Removing unpackaged files..." in both http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30909179/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.firefox-3.7_3.7~a1~hg20090827r32030%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz and http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30874616/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.firefox-3.7_3.7~a1~hg20090826r31978%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
[20:27] <fta> build/buildd/firefox-3.7-3.7~a1~hg20090827r32030+nobinonly should not be there
[20:36] <fta> mozilla 463605
[20:37] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 463605 in Build Config "make Mac OS X packaging use a packaging manifest (like Windows and Linux)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463605
[20:47] <fta> diff of the 2 build logs: http://paste.ubuntu.com/260511/
[20:48] <fta> -/usr/bin/perl -I../../xpinstall/packager -e 'use Packager; Packager::Copy( "../../dist", "../../dist/firefox-3.7", "packages-static", "unix", 1, 0, 1);'
[20:48] <fta> +/usr/bin/perl -I../../xpinstall/packager -e 'use Packager; Packager::Copy( "/build/buildd/firefox-3.7-3.7~a1~hgXXXXX+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/browser/installer/../../dist", "/build/buildd/firefox-3.7-3.7~a1~hgXXXXX+nobinonly/build-tree/mozilla/browser/installer/../../dist/firefox-3.7", "packages-static", "unix", 1, 0, 1);'
[20:48] <fta> this seems wrong
[20:59] <fta> [reed], http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0bd17bd1cbaf#l3.1
[21:00] <fta> [reed], i won't fix it in ubuntu, it's a regression from mac
[21:01] <[reed]> fta: the bug affects ubuntu, though, correct?
[21:01] <fta> it affects anyone using make install
[21:01] <[reed]> can you file a bug on it at least? you don't have to add a patch. I'll make sure somebody gets on it asap.
[21:10] <fta> [reed], mozilla 513067
[21:10] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 513067 in Build Config "install regression" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513067
[21:20] <fta> jcastro, ken's commit went to ~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging, my dailies are based on ~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging.trunk :(
[21:20] <fta> commitS
[21:28] <[reed]> fta: Is this via "make install" or "make package"?
[21:29] <fta> hm, make install