=== zorael__ is now known as Zorael [13:28] okay then. evdev_drv. [13:29] for whatever reason, an unmolested xorg is deciding that this mouse is a simple 5-button (i.e. left right plus clickwheel) mouse. this is wrong. i know i've had it right in the past, with mangled xorg [13:29] question is, why's it wrong and what can i do about it? [13:37] what does /proc/bus/input/devices say about that mouse? [13:38] also evtest on that device (/dev/input/eventX) [13:56] jcristau, http://paste.debian.net/45132/ [13:56] jcristau, i need to kill X for evtest don't i [13:57] shouldn't be necessary these days [13:57] the evtest command certainly lists more buttons than xev is responding to [13:57] Event code 275 (SideBtn) [13:57] Event code 6 (HWheel) [13:57] and so on [13:57] except for synaptics devices, but even then vt switching should be sufficient [13:58] http://paste.debian.net/45133/ [13:58] what version of evdev is this btw? [14:05] jcristau, whatever ships in jaunty [14:06] jcristau, and i think i see where it's going wrong... the mouse device (event6) is not actually registering anything at all. the mouseemu device (event5) is - but it lacks buttons [14:06] i have no idea what or why mouseemu is [14:07] wait, that was it... purging the mouseemu package [14:07] so why on earth was that installed, and why does it break multi-button support? [14:11] because you installed it? nothing depends on it [14:11] make that "no package" [14:11] i definitely didn't explicitly install it [14:16] /var/log/installer/syslog:Aug 25 16:11:49 ubuntu ubiquity: Setting up mouseemu (0.16-0ubuntu3) ... [14:16] officially not my fault [14:17] it's a laptop? [14:18] no, it's not - but it might have been misdetected as such? [14:18] could be [14:19] jms@osc-bigmac:~$ laptop-detect -v [14:19] We're not on a laptop (no relevant hint found) [14:19] d-i/source/hw-detect/hw-detect.sh:# Install mouseemu on systems likely to have single-button mice [14:19] ..... [14:20] heh [14:21] what a naive check [14:21] so file a bug against hw-detect [14:21] it's stupid that installing that package breaks a real mouse though.. [14:21] it is [14:22] it seems the package's priority is to add buttons to a 1-button mouse. i doubt they tested it in a 9-button scenario [14:27] tjaalton, in your opinion, better to file a bug against hw-detect regarding installing mouseemu inappropriately, or against mouseemu for breaking multi-button mice? [14:30] directhex: I vote for both. [14:32] ScottK, ja wol! [14:49] Bug #419935 filed [14:49] Launchpad bug 419935 in hw-detect "hw-detect wants to install mouseemu on Mac when it really shouldn't" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/419935 [15:55] yeah, that works [18:35] morning [20:37] afternoon bryce [20:37] jg, hello [20:38] bryce: I see you inflicted new bits on me this afternoon... [20:39] bryce: so far, so good... [20:40] bryce: I thought glxgears was supposed to end up getting throttled to VR... [20:45] it'll go faster if it can render frames faster than refresh [20:45] but it shouldn't tear [20:46] jbarnes: ah, thanks. [20:47] jbarnes: I see no tearing. === zorael_ is now known as Zorael [23:32] hey bryce. does shutterworth's word overrule a 'denied for karmic'? [23:32] LLStarks, eh? [23:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/377090/comments/24 [23:33] Launchpad bug 377090 in mesa "[i945gm] (Needs kernel 2.6.31) DRI2 swapbuffers" [Wishlist,In progress] [23:33] from mark with love. [23:34] jeeze [23:35] jbarnes, hey, where are we at with the dri2 swapbuffer stuff? [23:35] bryce: just updated that bug :) [23:35] LLStarks pointed me at it [23:37] jbarnes, how mature is the stuff? Is it currently pretty stable or would it destabilize things a lot if we merged it right now? [23:37] I wouldn't recommend it for karmic [23:40] bryce: it would be good to have in edgers though [23:40] but I'd just wait until it lands [23:40] shouldn't be long now before those branches are merged into master of the various repos [23:41] if i was to use the bits that are already implemented and then supplement the dri2 branches from proto and xserver, would that be sufficient for a testing enviroment? [23:43] yeah that should be enough