[03:21] <kfogel> micahg: loud in here :-)
[03:31] <micahg> yeah
[03:39] <mwhudson> suits me fine!
[04:07] <asabil> hi all
[04:09] <asabil> is there a way to reply to a mailing list message from the mail archive user page ?
[04:09] <asabil> I wasn't subscribed to the launchpad-users mailing list, and I want to reply to the launchpad 4.0 feature request
[04:51] <mwhudson> asabil: i don't think so
[04:51] <mwhudson> asabil: but i'm sure your reply will be seen even if you don't reply properly :)
[04:53] <asabil> mwhudson: ok thanks
[05:46] <ub3rst4r> hi, are there admins available?
[05:48] <ub3rst4r> anyone related to lp?
[05:49] <ub3rst4r> and i dont mean linkin park...
[05:51] <spm> ub3rst4r: what's the issue?
[05:53] <ub3rst4r> well...
[05:54] <ub3rst4r> i want to know how u get a product put on the front page of lp
[05:57] <mwhudson> ub3rst4r: "be interesting enough that the developers decide you belong there"
[05:57] <spm> ub3rst4r: as a featured project? create an answer request here https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion and *sell* why you believe XYZ project should be there.
[06:08] <ub3rst4r> thanks
[06:30] <zj3t3mju> i have problem with launchpad build system
[06:30] <wgrant> zj3t3mju: What's not going right?
[06:30] <zj3t3mju> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-vn/+archive/ppa/+build/1189724
[06:30] <zj3t3mju> it take too long
[06:30] <zj3t3mju> it really need some minute
[06:31] <zj3t3mju> i think it freeze
[06:31] <zj3t3mju> :|
[06:31] <wgrant> zj3t3mju: Indeed, there's something wrong with that build machine.
[06:31] <zj3t3mju> what now?
[06:32] <wgrant> spm: Who kicks buildds these days?
[06:34] <spm> wgrant: chasing... may be kicked RSN
[06:34] <wgrant> spm: Thanks.
[06:59] <shiki-> launchpad is dead atm?
[07:01] <mwhudson> shiki-: no?
[07:02] <spm> shiki-: url?
[07:02] <shiki-> okay.. it was temporary
[07:02] <shiki-> it said timeout, we recorded the error, error id, blah blah
[07:03] <spm> code page?
[10:04] <shiki-> where can I ask an admin to help out?
[10:05] <shiki-> (the story: I uploaded the packages into my ppa. Thats ok. But I used ~ppa1~jaunty1 somehwere, and ~jaunty1~ppa1 somewhere..ehhhhh)
[10:05] <bigjools> shiki-: what do you want?
[10:06] <shiki-> rename the packages in my PPA to the correct name. Package~ppa1~jaunty1 for example
[10:06] <bigjools> shiki-: nobody can do that, unfortunately
[10:06] <shiki-> ehhhh
[10:07] <bigjools> it's not a rename, it's a version change
[10:07] <shiki-> then bump versions?
[10:07] <shiki-> I should do that?
[10:07] <bigjools> you can do that yourself, yep
[10:07] <shiki-> okay...
[10:07] <shiki-> ty
[10:07] <bigjools> np
[10:07] <shiki-> just when I thoght Im done
[10:07] <shiki-> ..ehehe :)
[10:07] <bigjools> good luck :)
[10:07] <shiki-> ty :/ :)
[10:34] <Ursinha> OOPS-1336F604
[10:53] <shiki-> okay.. problem :)
[10:53] <shiki-> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30930407/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.mpg123_1.7.2-3ubuntu1~ppa2~intrepid1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ; http://pastebin.com/d5534de35
[10:53] <shiki-> the first is the log (as you can see from url), second one is the file it refers before the purge
[10:58] <shiki-> any idea what causes the error? :/
[11:22] <bigjools> shiki-: #ubuntu-motu is a better place to ask about that
[11:23] <shiki-> bigjools, ty
[11:29] <zj3t3mju> wgrant: is it still not resolved?
[11:31] <wgrant> bigjools: Can you get somebody to kick bohrium?
[11:32] <bigjools> wgrant: wassup?
[11:33] <bigjools> ah I see
[13:35] <fta> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~fta/+junk/ppa-confs/files => Internal Server Error
[13:43] <mrevell> thanks fta, let me speak to the admins
[13:44] <\u03b5> same at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~armagetronad-dev/armagetronad/0.2.8-armagetronad-work/files
[13:44] <\u03b5> probably expands to whole bazaar.lp.net
[13:46] <wgrant> Do those login issues still exist? I haven't seen them for several days.
[13:47] <mrevell> wgrant: We're still getting email to feedback@launchpad.net about them
[13:50] <wgrant> mrevell: Huh.
[14:00] <mrevell> fta, \u03b5: bazaar.launchpad.net is back now
[14:00] <\u03b5> ty
[14:00] <fta> thanks
[16:30] <mneptok> how can i delete a branch that other branches stack on without futzing with the branches that stack?
[16:37] <mrevell> abentley: Are you able to help mneptok
[16:37] <mrevell> howdy, btw, mneptok :)
[16:37] <mneptok> mrevell: heya! :)
[16:37] <mrevell> mneptok: How's life?
[16:38] <mneptok> mrevell: quite nice. and definitely preferable to the alternative.
[16:38] <mrevell> :)
[16:38] <mneptok> well, other than LP hating our stacking
[16:39] <abentley> mneptok: In order to delete a stacked-on branch, you must futz with the branches that stack on it, or else you will break them.
[16:39] <mneptok> abentley: i really want to delete https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/6.0
[16:40] <mneptok> but it looks like our 5.2 branch may stack on it.
[16:40] <mneptok> what's the officially blessed way to resolve it?
[16:40] <abentley> mneptok: So if you delete it, you'll damage the 5.2 branch.  If you don't care about the 5.2 branch, then you can delete it.
[16:41] <abentley> (delete the 5.2 branch, I mean)
[16:41] <mneptok> i don't care. but He Who Signs My Paychecks does.
[16:41] <mneptok> so how do i tweak 5.2 exactly? pardon my ignorance ...
[16:42] <abentley> mneptok: I think you need to delete the files of the 5.2 branch and re-push it, stacked on something else.
[16:42] <mneptok> k
[16:42] <abentley> mneptok: You can delete the files using an sftp client or lp:hitchhiker.
[16:43] <mneptok> that seems like a bit of overkill for such a small issue. like using artillery to kill a housefly.
[16:44] <mneptok> but then again, i am sort of ignorant as regards these things, so my opinion is far from an informed one.
[16:45] <abentley> mneptok: You're asking to change the content of the 5.2 branch, perhaps radically.  We can probably make it easier, but it is a big deal.
[16:46] <mneptok> *nod*
[16:48] <abentley> One thing I don't see is a link to the branches that are stacked on 6.0.  We should provide that.  Maybe bzr could provide a re-push command or something that would delete all the files and push again.  Not sure what the right fix would be.
[17:52] <lamalex> Is launchpad brandable if a company were to setup their own inhouse instance?
[17:52] <beuno> lamalex, no easily, no
[17:53] <lamalex> and will canonical be (or is) selling support for third party lp instances?
[17:53] <beuno> lamalex, bac is the guy to talk to about commercial services
[17:54] <lamalex> beuno: thanks
[17:54] <bac> lamalex:  hi, at the moment our commercial offering is for hosted services on launchpad.net
[17:55] <lamalex> bac: still not brandable?
[17:55] <bac> lamalex: we have discussed a branded launchpad.net but do not have it on our roadmap
[17:57] <lamalex> maybe I should have used that as one of my 3 in launchpad 4.0 planning
[17:57] <bac> lamalex: if you have thoughts on what you'd like to see i'd like to hear them.
[17:57] <spO> is this where i launch my rockets into space?
[17:57] <spO> i have a new piece of shit i would like to launch from my ass
[17:57] <spO> 5
[17:57] <spO> 4
[17:57] <spO> 3
[17:57] <spO> 2
[17:58] <spO> 1
[17:58] <spO> explode
[17:58] <spO> just kidding
[18:01] <lamalex> bac: The ability to tweak the css, rather than launchpad > project be OurCompany > project
[18:01] <lamalex> in the bread crumb bar
[18:05] <bac> lamalex: if we offer a branded, hosted launchpad we would include a skin and url redirection.  i was wondering if you had other thoughts on what you'd like to see in such an offering.
[18:05] <lamalex> no launchpad is awesome, it's really mostly the url and the visible branding
[18:06] <lamalex> maybe the ability to have private branches
[18:06] <lamalex> which cannot be viewed/branched without credentials
[18:07] <Laney> cprov: Hey, with your queue-builder fix, can I expect to see a Karmic record for hugs98 on armel created soon?
[18:08] <cprov> Laney: yes, but not before 3.0. It doesn't fit the LP cherrypicking process.
[18:09] <Laney> alright
[18:09] <Laney> is there any chance you could manually create it?
[18:10] <cprov> Laney: not really, the preferred and easiest way is to re-upload (IMO)
[18:10] <Laney> ok
[18:12] <cprov> Laney: anything blocking karmic uploads right now other than the shorter time for testing ?
[18:12] <Laney> there's FF but that doesn't apply here
[18:13] <Laney> I just didn't want to have to rebuild on all arches just to have a look at one
[18:13] <Laney> when there's a good chance it will still fail
[18:16] <cprov> Laney: I understand ... it's odd.
[19:07] <maxb> Urgh. LP's time-on-queue based rescoring makes urgency completely useless for requesting a build ASAP
[19:12] <w4ett> mwhudson: user https://launchpad.net/~zulkharn is spaming again see: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/53861
[19:28] <hggdh> do we have a documentation of the Lp API that applies to edge?
[19:47] <kiko> hggdh, sure, the API doc is rolled out together with the appserver
[19:51] <hggdh> thanks
[21:09] <MTeck> hrm.... trying to setup my system so root can update all bzr branches....
[21:20] <MTeck> How do I log into bzr again?
[21:26] <beuno> MTeck, bzr launchpad-login?
[21:27] <MTeck> beuno: thanks - I just found it too :P
[21:27] <MTeck> so simple - hard to remember when I never ever use it though
[21:37] <dhillon-v101> hi everyone
[21:39] <MTeck> hi
[21:41] <lfaraone> hey, my project has a fairly large db of users in our trac system. when we move this over, is there a way to create accounts for the migrated users?
[21:41] <dhillon-v101>  MTeck: how are you
[21:41] <lfaraone> (and give them options to change their password etc)
[21:42] <MTeck> dhillon-v101: good, you?
[21:42] <dhillon-v101>  MTeck: not badm I have a question for you
[21:42] <MTeck> ya?
[21:42] <dhillon-v101> *bad
[21:43] <dhillon-v101> alright so I want to know how to restrict people from pushing to my project branches and only allowing some to
[21:44] <MTeck> dhillon-v101: you make a team that owns the project, then set the access to the team to restricted
[21:44] <dhillon-v101>  MTeck: alright thanks
[21:51] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, generally the users will have to create accounts themselves
[21:51] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, I don't think that's a bad idea entirely as you want to make sure they are okay with the switch
[21:51] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, how many is "fairly large"?
[21:51] <lfaraone> kiko-afk: 500~ users.
[21:52] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, it's pretty easy to precreate accounts for them, and once that's done, they'll need to generate passwords
[21:52] <kiko-afk> at least that's how I'd see it done
[21:53] <maxb> Why is there a need to precreate accounts, ooi?
[21:53] <lfaraone> kiko-afk: okay. once we've precreated accounts for them, can we add them to teams before they've verified/reset their password?
[21:54] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, hmmm, probably not. there are ways to activate their accounts without them verifying passwords, but the thing that concerns me is that if we do that, Launchpad will feel entitled to email them, and I don't think that's ToS kosher IYKWIM
[21:54] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, what project are you migrating?
[21:55] <lfaraone> kiko-afk: http://sugarlabs.org/
[21:55] <lfaraone> kiko-afk: we're the offspring of the One Laptop per Child GUI project, Sugar.
[21:55] <lfaraone> kiko-afk: and I'm currently trying to ready a smooth transition plan from trac to present to the board.
[21:57] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, so you should organize a chat with kfogel on monday; him and I and curtis will be able to help you with specific problems
[21:58] <lfaraone> kiko-afk: Okay. Unfortunately, I'll be over the Atlantic on Monday, but I'd love to take a raincheck!
[21:58] <kiko-afk> lfaraone, I'm sure we can find a solution to the specific user migration issue -- but I am just wary of getting users upset because we added them to Launchpad officially without them saying so
[22:00]  * MTeck hugs kiko-afk 
[22:00] <MTeck> :( I scared him
[22:00] <lfaraone> MTeck: The hug of death!
[22:04] <MTeck> kiko: sorry, I didn't mean to scare you off
[22:04] <kiko> wrong button :-/