[00:40] <penguin42> hurrah it finally went - with a BadAccess and I have a core
[00:42] <penguin42> oh that was possibly from IcedTea and well, that's flaky as hell
[00:44] <BUGabundo> fta: yeah gwibber is just burping a lot :(
[02:42] <[reed]> fta: ping
[02:42] <fta> yes?
[02:43] <[reed]> fta: to make shaver happy, can you do a build with the patches from mozilla bug 463605 backed out and see if it works?
[02:43] <[reed]> as in, backout http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0bd17bd1cbaf and http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5baf439a991a
[02:43] <[reed]> and try a build
[02:47] <fta> [reed], i sure can, but i don't see what is opaque in my build logs
[02:48] <[reed]> fta: I agree, but please do it
[02:48] <[reed]> it'll appease shaver
[02:49] <[reed]> fta: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513067#c12
[02:49] <[reed]> also that
[02:51] <fta> [reed], the reason it fails is really simple, there's an absolute path somewhere. this is a make install DESTDIR=debian/tmp: http://paste.ubuntu.com/261696/
[02:52] <[reed]> can you say that in the bug?
[02:52] <fta> [reed], so line 67+ are all wrong
[02:52] <[reed]> explain exactly
[03:02] <fta> [reed], done. it's a misery to revert the patches, more patches have been applied on top already
[03:12] <fta> hm, it's also wrong in dist/
[03:16] <fta> [reed], commented, twice. it's 4am, i'm off now
[03:16] <[reed]> thanks
[07:50] <rugby471> hi guys
[07:51] <rugby471> trying to create a patch for a bug in firefox
[07:51] <rugby471> however I can't seem to get quilt to work for me
[07:51] <rugby471> I have done apt-get source firefox-3.5
[07:51] <rugby471> gone into that directory and extracted the archive as mozilla/
[07:51] <rugby471> however when I try to do 'quilt push -a'
[07:52] <rugby471> it says No file to patch.  Skipping patch. for all the patches
[07:52] <rugby471> any help?
[08:29] <rugby471> don't worry I managed to write the quilt patch manually
[12:17] <BUGabundo> hey
[16:39] <fta> BUGabundo, your redent lost the \ ?
[16:40] <BUGabundo> darn xmpp bug :(
[21:07] <fta> ripps, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~fta/+junk/ppa-scripts/revision/119
[21:09] <micahg> fta: can there be only one package that provides the meta package xulrunner-dev?
[21:09] <fta> no
[21:09] <micahg> ok, I'm trying to verify stuff for the karmic transistion
[21:10] <micahg> and xulrunner-dev is still provided by xul1.9 in the .head branch
[21:10] <micahg> is this ok?
[21:10] <fta> yes, the version is lower than 3.5 so it's fine
[21:10] <micahg> ok
[21:10] <fta> i meant 1.9.1
[21:10] <micahg> so, as long as xul1.9.1 provides it, we're ok?
[21:11] <fta> i think so
[21:11] <micahg> ok
[21:28] <fta> well well well, my bot is starting to look good, may be time to package it
[23:00] <fta> [reed], 4th day red
[23:02] <BUGabundo> oooooh
[23:02] <[reed]> fta: he respondede
[23:02] <[reed]> -e
[23:02] <[reed]> you could respond
[23:03] <fta> [reed], to say what? he admitted he made the change causing the regression, now what?
[23:04] <[reed]> well, let's see what he has to say