[01:12] <micahg> bug/feature humor: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DilbertDailyStrip/~3/ELiqVQ2o2Zw/
[06:41] <dholbach> good morning
[15:00] <bddebian> Boo
[15:40] <^arky^> hi, Where do you assign bugs related to non-working repo's
[15:48] <gnomefreak> ^arky^: ask them to try gb repos :)
[15:48] <gnomefreak> non-working repos are generall the repos "owner" for lack of a better word
[15:53] <arand> Would Bug #421407 qualify for a papercut?
[15:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 421407 in ubiquity "[Jaunty and Karmic] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the Ubuntu partition (far too small)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/421407
[16:02] <thekorn> bdmurray: hi, just FYI I started rewriting bughelper over the last weekend, https://code.launchpad.net/~bughelper-dev/bughelper/bughelper-ng
[16:35] <dholbach> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek starting in 25 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom
[19:42] <hggdh> ping bdmurray
[20:16] <bdmurray> hggdh: hi
[20:22] <hggdh> bdmurray, I think I now know why edge does not work on the GMs -- edge has changed the links, and instead of going to bugs.edge.lp.net,
[20:22] <hggdh> it goes to edge.lp.net. Ergo... CSS
[20:25] <dhillon-v101> hey guys, can I talk to Brian Curtis
[20:30] <hggdh> dhillon-v101, it is probably bcurtiswx, but he is not here right now
[21:22] <BUGabundo> boas noites
[21:22] <BUGabundo> /me waves
[21:31]  * hggdh waves back, and notice BUGabundo is using a broken IRC client
[21:32] <BUGabundo> hggdh: NEVER!
[21:32] <BUGabundo> and guud evening
[21:32] <BUGabundo> hggdh: why whould you say that?
[21:35] <hggdh> bucause of the "/me" at the beginning
[21:35] <hggdh> BUGabundo, can you please search gmane.org for messages (in ubuntu-bugs) from me? "C de-Avillez"
[21:35] <hggdh> the most recent I can find is either *none*, or March 2009
[21:41] <BUGabundo> hggdh: so?
[21:43] <hggdh> I have more input in ubuntu-bugs than that
[21:44] <hggdh> I certainly did not stop opening bugs, or working on them ;-)
[21:44] <BUGabundo> I don't follow Carlos :(
[21:44] <hggdh> I want to know if I am doing something wrong, or if gmane is just being picky with me
[21:46] <hggdh> bdmurray, I have a replacement lp_karma_suffix GM that adds a search link on the commenter (on gmane)
[21:47] <BUGabundo> ahhhh
[21:47] <BUGabundo> two points
[21:47] <BUGabundo> I was still stuck on /me
[21:47] <BUGabundo> :/
[21:54] <BUGabundo> what's the nvidia opensource driver package name?
[21:55] <micahg> nv?
[21:55] <BUGabundo> no idea
[21:55] <micahg> xserver-xorg-video-nv
[21:55] <BUGabundo> thanks
[21:55] <Nafallo> !info xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
[21:56] <ubot4> Nafallo: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (source: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau): X.Org X server -- Nouveau display driver (experimental). In component universe, is optional. Version 1:0.0.10~git+20090404+11be9a9-0ubuntu1 (jaunty), package size 169 kB, installed size 420 kB
[22:02] <MightyTweek> Can anyone provide guidance on getting the priority of a bug onto a dev's radar for the release of Karmic? Specifically https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/361856
[22:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 361856 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 "New upstream 173.14.18 available" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
[22:02] <mac_v> BUGabundo: just a doubt, isnt the nm applet supposed to refresh the wireless list when clicked on it?
[22:02] <mac_v> i'v read it some where but forgot the link!
[22:02] <BUGabundo> mac_v: not afaik
[22:02] <BUGabundo> mac_v: $ nm-tool
[22:02] <Nafallo> mac_v: I thought it scanned for networks all the time?
[22:03] <BUGabundo> or sudo iwlist wlan0 scan
[22:03] <BUGabundo> Nafallo: every 45 secs I think
[22:03] <mac_v> i dont have problem,
[22:03] <Nafallo> I wonder how much battery that activity chews throu...
[22:04] <mac_v> but i read that the nm-applet is supposed to refresh the network lists when you click on it , there are bug reports for a button so want to mark as dups
[22:04] <mac_v> ;)
[22:05] <mac_v> damn it , wish asac was not a vacation :(
[22:05] <mac_v> on*
[22:06] <BUGabundo> eheh
[22:06] <BUGabundo> wasn't he back already?
[22:12] <mac_v> BUGabundo: Nafallo http://live.gnome.org/DarrenAlbers/NetworkManagerFAQ#head-96dbd4cab9367561769e01ca9e40776fbab2a83a
[22:13] <mac_v> hehe  , not bad memory :)
[22:25] <MightyTweek> Let's say there's a LP bug with Wishlist importance requesting an import from upstream, but there's a major regression the new version resolves. File a new bug or post a comment to the existing one requesting the priority be bumped up?
[22:26] <micahg> MightyTweek: bug #?
[22:26] <MightyTweek> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/361856
[22:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 361856 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 "New upstream 173.14.18 available" [Wishlist,Confirmed]
[22:27] <micahg> MightyTweek: which version of Ubuntu do you want this for?
[22:27] <MightyTweek> Karmic
[22:28] <MightyTweek> the major regression being that the current version doesn't even compile on 2.6.31
[22:29] <BUGabundo> karmic doesn't have 173 anymore
[22:29] <BUGabundo> afair
[22:29] <kees> sure it does
[22:29] <micahg> MightyTweek: there's already comment about that in the bug
[22:29] <BUGabundo> ok
[22:29] <kees> nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 | 173.14.16-0ubuntu1 | file: karmic/restricted Sources
[22:29] <BUGabundo> then I was wrong
[22:30] <MightyTweek> My graphics adapter (GeForce FX 5200) is not supported by the newest nvidia driver, thus needing this one
[22:31] <micahg> MightyTweek: I would suggest checking with #ubuntu-motu to see if anyone will be working on this
[22:31] <BUGabundo> ppa for the beta xorg driver? anyone knows?
[22:31] <MightyTweek> micahg: thanks, will do
[22:32] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers
[22:32] <BUGabundo> thanks
[22:34] <MightyTweek> in the meantime, does it make sense to nominate it for release for Karmic and mark the other bugs relating to the breakage on Karmic as duplicates of this one?
[22:35] <micahg> well, one's an update request
[22:35] <micahg> and one's a regression
[22:35] <micahg> I would think the regression should be prioritized
[22:35] <micahg> and a note added that it will fix the update as well
[22:36] <micahg> but I might be wrong
[22:36] <micahg> ping hggdh ^^
[22:38] <micahg> ping bdmurray
[22:39] <bdmurray> micahg: that sounds reasonable to me
[22:39] <micahg> ok
[22:39] <micahg> so keep them separate for the moment then?
[22:39] <bdmurray> yes
[22:39] <micahg> MightyTweek: did you catch that?
[22:42] <MightyTweek> micahg, yes, so I guess I should comment on one of the existing bugs about the breakage and mention the wishlist?
[22:44] <micahg> yeah
[22:45] <micahg> MightyTweek: here
[22:45] <micahg> s the person you should contact about the package
[22:45] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~albertomilone
[22:46] <MightyTweek> thanks micahg
[22:50] <hggdh> bdmurray, ping
[22:53] <hggdh> OK. going back to the hotel, will be back in 30 min.