=== Hellow_ is now known as Hellow [01:12] bug/feature humor: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DilbertDailyStrip/~3/ELiqVQ2o2Zw/ === r0bby_ is now known as r0bby === Richie is now known as YDdraigGoch === micahg1 is now known as micahg [06:41] good morning === Richie is now known as YDdraigGoch === YDdraigGoch is now known as Guest71540 === Guest71540 is now known as YDdraigGoch === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [15:00] Boo [15:40] <^arky^> hi, Where do you assign bugs related to non-working repo's [15:48] ^arky^: ask them to try gb repos :) [15:48] non-working repos are generall the repos "owner" for lack of a better word [15:53] Would Bug #421407 qualify for a papercut? [15:53] Launchpad bug 421407 in ubiquity "[Jaunty and Karmic] the installer by default proposes a wrong size for the Ubuntu partition (far too small)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/421407 === trothigar is now known as fhoward === fhoward is now known as trewa === trewa is now known as troth === troth is now known as trothigar [16:02] bdmurray: hi, just FYI I started rewriting bughelper over the last weekend, https://code.launchpad.net/~bughelper-dev/bughelper/bughelper-ng [16:35] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek starting in 25 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom === marjomercado is now known as marjo === yoasif_ is now known as yoasif [19:42] ping bdmurray [20:16] hggdh: hi [20:22] bdmurray, I think I now know why edge does not work on the GMs -- edge has changed the links, and instead of going to bugs.edge.lp.net, [20:22] it goes to edge.lp.net. Ergo... CSS [20:25] hey guys, can I talk to Brian Curtis [20:30] dhillon-v101, it is probably bcurtiswx, but he is not here right now [21:22] boas noites [21:22] /me waves [21:31] * hggdh waves back, and notice BUGabundo is using a broken IRC client [21:32] hggdh: NEVER! [21:32] and guud evening [21:32] hggdh: why whould you say that? [21:35] bucause of the "/me" at the beginning [21:35] BUGabundo, can you please search gmane.org for messages (in ubuntu-bugs) from me? "C de-Avillez" [21:35] the most recent I can find is either *none*, or March 2009 === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo [21:41] hggdh: so? [21:43] I have more input in ubuntu-bugs than that [21:44] I certainly did not stop opening bugs, or working on them ;-) [21:44] I don't follow Carlos :( [21:44] I want to know if I am doing something wrong, or if gmane is just being picky with me [21:46] bdmurray, I have a replacement lp_karma_suffix GM that adds a search link on the commenter (on gmane) [21:47] ahhhh [21:47] two points [21:47] I was still stuck on /me [21:47] :/ [21:54] what's the nvidia opensource driver package name? [21:55] nv? [21:55] no idea [21:55] xserver-xorg-video-nv [21:55] thanks [21:55] !info xserver-xorg-video-nouveau [21:56] Nafallo: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (source: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau): X.Org X server -- Nouveau display driver (experimental). In component universe, is optional. Version 1:0.0.10~git+20090404+11be9a9-0ubuntu1 (jaunty), package size 169 kB, installed size 420 kB [22:02] Can anyone provide guidance on getting the priority of a bug onto a dev's radar for the release of Karmic? Specifically https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/361856 [22:02] Launchpad bug 361856 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 "New upstream 173.14.18 available" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [22:02] BUGabundo: just a doubt, isnt the nm applet supposed to refresh the wireless list when clicked on it? [22:02] i'v read it some where but forgot the link! [22:02] mac_v: not afaik [22:02] mac_v: $ nm-tool [22:02] mac_v: I thought it scanned for networks all the time? [22:03] or sudo iwlist wlan0 scan [22:03] Nafallo: every 45 secs I think [22:03] i dont have problem, [22:03] I wonder how much battery that activity chews throu... [22:04] but i read that the nm-applet is supposed to refresh the network lists when you click on it , there are bug reports for a button so want to mark as dups [22:04] ;) [22:05] damn it , wish asac was not a vacation :( [22:05] on* [22:06] eheh [22:06] wasn't he back already? === Richie is now known as YDdraigGoch [22:12] BUGabundo: Nafallo http://live.gnome.org/DarrenAlbers/NetworkManagerFAQ#head-96dbd4cab9367561769e01ca9e40776fbab2a83a [22:13] hehe , not bad memory :) [22:25] Let's say there's a LP bug with Wishlist importance requesting an import from upstream, but there's a major regression the new version resolves. File a new bug or post a comment to the existing one requesting the priority be bumped up? [22:26] MightyTweek: bug #? [22:26] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/361856 [22:26] Launchpad bug 361856 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 "New upstream 173.14.18 available" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [22:27] MightyTweek: which version of Ubuntu do you want this for? [22:27] Karmic [22:28] the major regression being that the current version doesn't even compile on 2.6.31 [22:29] karmic doesn't have 173 anymore [22:29] afair [22:29] sure it does [22:29] MightyTweek: there's already comment about that in the bug [22:29] ok [22:29] nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 | 173.14.16-0ubuntu1 | file: karmic/restricted Sources [22:29] then I was wrong [22:30] My graphics adapter (GeForce FX 5200) is not supported by the newest nvidia driver, thus needing this one [22:31] MightyTweek: I would suggest checking with #ubuntu-motu to see if anyone will be working on this [22:31] ppa for the beta xorg driver? anyone knows? [22:31] micahg: thanks, will do [22:32] https://edge.launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers [22:32] thanks [22:34] in the meantime, does it make sense to nominate it for release for Karmic and mark the other bugs relating to the breakage on Karmic as duplicates of this one? [22:35] well, one's an update request [22:35] and one's a regression [22:35] I would think the regression should be prioritized [22:35] and a note added that it will fix the update as well [22:36] but I might be wrong [22:36] ping hggdh ^^ [22:38] ping bdmurray [22:39] micahg: that sounds reasonable to me [22:39] ok [22:39] so keep them separate for the moment then? [22:39] yes [22:39] MightyTweek: did you catch that? [22:42] micahg, yes, so I guess I should comment on one of the existing bugs about the breakage and mention the wishlist? [22:44] yeah [22:45] MightyTweek: here [22:45] s the person you should contact about the package [22:45] https://edge.launchpad.net/~albertomilone [22:46] thanks micahg [22:50] bdmurray, ping [22:53] OK. going back to the hotel, will be back in 30 min.