[00:00] W:myapp: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/myapp [00:00] N: [00:00] N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should [00:00] N: have a manual page [00:00] N: [00:00] N: Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several [00:00] amplebein: thanks, I'm rebuilding with pbuilder and i386 now - if that works should i file a "rebuild" bug? [00:00] N: program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have [00:00] N: its own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is [00:00] N: sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman [00:00] N: don't support this. [00:00] N: [00:00] N: If the name of the man page differs from the binary by case, man may be [00:00] N: able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to make the [00:00] N: case of the man page match the case of the binary. [00:00] GRRRR [00:00] N: [00:00] N: If the man pages are provided by another package on which this package [00:00] N: depends, lintian may not be able to determine that man pages are [00:00] N: available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have man [00:00] N: pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add [00:00] N: a lintian override. [00:00] N: [00:00] N: Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 12.1 (Manual pages) for details. [00:00] N: [00:00] N: Severity: normal, Certainty: possible [00:00] (sorry for flood) [00:00] showard: no need to, if it is successful, notify me and I'll request a giveback [00:01] shakaran, are you familiar with pastebin ? [00:01] shakaran: paste.ubuntu.com (in case you did not know this) [00:01] ok, I will check now [00:01] shakaran, have you read debian policy 12.1? [00:02] yeah, http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html but I dont know to fix this [00:02] It says something like nroff === micahg1 is now known as micahg [00:06] well, then what I need to fix? [00:14] I need to gzip the file? [00:14] shakaran, you should learn how to use linux in general, and care about development/packaging later [00:15] well, then when I release my app? [00:15] not understanding how file permissions work is a serious risk for packaging [00:16] The problem is that I dont know every word in english, and all the documentation is in ENGLISH [00:16] shakaran, when you are ready to do it, or by filling a needs packaging request and wait for someone to package it [00:16] the lintian message dont suggest anything for me over change the permission of file [00:17] only "read the manual"...and "read again"...that dont help anything [00:17] shakaran, I was refering to your previous question, about the image file permissions [00:18] yeah, but your answer offend me [00:18] shakaran, you need to understand how to generate a manpage and how to install it as part of the packaging process [00:19] shakaran, I had no intention to offend you, is just that you should get basic linux skills before packaging, understandinf file permissions is fundamental [00:19] manpage generation isn't actually a common skill amongst ubuntu packagers, but it's mandatory for debian's NM process [00:19] yeah, I read a lot of stuff, but it is only for C, myapp is write in python and many things changes (maybe dont with manpage) [00:19] I use ubuntu since 5.04...believe I know how to change the file permissions, but I dont understand what says me the message [00:20] shakaran, ok please apologize I didn't understood it was an english interpretation problem :( [00:21] yeah, my real problem is write/speak in english (I have a basic level) [00:22] joaopinto: apology accepted [00:23] well, then I have the XML file on /debian (I really want learn to package by myself). Then I change the manpage.xml.ex to myapp.xml [00:23] And then I don gzip -9 myapp.xml? [00:24] I need change the debian/rules file to copy to /usr/share/man/? [00:24] or something more for remove the lintian warning? [00:26] shakaran, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/SupplementaryFiles#Man%20Pages [00:27] thanks, I go to read it (Im back if I have problems) [00:38] ampelbein: octave3.0 builds now, I think the bug you linked fixed it. Could you do a "give-back?" (is a give-back just a request to the build server to rebuild?) [00:39] showard: yes. will do. [00:41] yeehaw. 'jaunty' packages built for all the dependencies for chef that weren't backported yet. yay sbuild. [00:43] man pages, fwiw, are much easier to digest when you have help2man (and a program properly outputs --help and --version). [00:45] joaopinto: I read the manual. It says about use pod2man and include perl as dependency, but it only neccesary for build from .pod file to manpage. I use a .xml file for that, how to convert from .xml? [00:54] p3rror, ping [00:54] please, I need some help [01:05] shakaran, not sure this will help http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/xmlto [01:06] I see xsltproc, but it doesn't working [01:08] I see something like: http://paste.ubuntu.com/262809/ [06:05] How do I add a repository to pbuilder so that it CAN find my build dependencies? [06:06] the OTHERMIRROR= in the config file [06:13] sluimers: See http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [06:13] jmarsden, thanks! [06:14] No problem. [06:43] good morning [06:45] Morning dholbach! [06:45] hola iulian [07:03] gooood morning [07:04] (and happy spring if you're in the bottom half of the world) [07:04] highvoltage: top half, I swear it is. [07:04] see, the centre of gravity of humans is in the northen hemisphere... so it has to have rolled to the bottom :) [07:05] * jmarsden thinks... some people and their upside-down maps :) [07:05] lifeless: heh, sounds logical! [07:06] http://flourish.org/upsidedownmap/ [07:07] that just looks weird [07:09] (but cool) [08:31] 'morning!! [08:45] gaspa: [08:45] _ _ _ ____ ______ __ ____ ___ ____ _____ _ _ ____ _ __ ___ [08:45] | | | | / \ | _ \| _ \ \ / / | __ )_ _| _ \_ _| | | | _ \ / \\ \ / / | [08:45] | |_| | / _ \ | |_) | |_) \ V / | _ \| || |_) || | | |_| | | | |/ _ \\ V /| | [08:45] | _ |/ ___ \| __/| __/ | | | |_) | || _ < | | | _ | |_| / ___ \| | |_| [08:45] |_| |_/_/ \_\_| |_| |_| |____/___|_| \_\|_| |_| |_|____/_/ \_\_| (_) [08:45] [08:45] :-) [08:45] LOL [08:46] wow, thank you, really! [08:47] * gaspa saves this irc log... [08:47] :-) [08:53] we still use initrd? === Richie is now known as YDdraigGoch === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === proppy1 is now known as proppy [11:03] Please could someone with the relevant privelages mark https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/417337 as invalid? [11:03] Launchpad bug 417337 in grub "Grub freezes on MacBook 5,2" [Undecided,New] [11:04] Sorry, please could that be won't fix === keylocker is now known as leleobhz [11:45] Hi, I have a problem with building python package with CDBS (might be cdbs bug) https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/81583 Any sugestions how to solve it? [11:49] dundee, it's not a cdbs bug [11:49] dundee, your python-dev dep is listed as python-dev >= 2.5 [11:49] dundee, in karmic we have python-dev 2.6 [11:50] dundee, Get:10 http://ftpmaster.internal jaunty/main python2.6 2.6.2-0ubuntu1 [2454kB] [11:50] Get:11 http://ftpmaster.internal jaunty/main python 2.6.2-0ubuntu1 [141kB] [11:50] that's it ;) [11:51] dundee, and anyway julian gave you the answer already [11:53] thanks, will try [11:54] np [13:12] andv: hello === mthalmei is now known as MichiSoft [14:16] is it just me or is the gnome-panel currently always reloading in karmic ? [14:16] hm, this question better goes to #ubuntu+q [14:16] #ubuntu+1 [14:17] c_korn: [14:17] c_korn: it shouldn't be. i don't notice it doing so here [14:18] in #ubuntu+1 nemo has the same problem === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:41] Heya gang === asac_ is now known as asac === korn_ is now known as c_korn [16:09] Hi! How can I specify that a certain file is a configuration file when using a .install file to copy files from the source into the binary package? [16:10] I'm using debhelper === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [16:22] Where can I find docs on the various .XXX files? I know about .install .links, are there more? [16:28] .docs .dirs [16:28] .link(s?) [16:29] .symbols [16:29] flohack: Read all the dh_* man pages if you need to know all of them. [16:30] jmarsden: ahh...I see, those beginning with dh_install are the right ones, thanks! [16:30] No problem. man 7 debhelper has a list of the dh_ commands, if you need that. [16:42] Ubuntu Developer Week starting in 19 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom === tgm4883 is now known as tgm4883_ === tgm4883_ is now known as tgm4883 [17:38] i have a question about snort package for jaunty [17:38] when will it get updated? [17:38] seeing as snort 2.7.0 is vulnerable [17:39] kinda hard to believe since its a security package === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:43] a1g_: snort is a universe package and is community supported. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam#Introduction [17:48] ok, thx [17:49] will snort2.8.4.1 from karmic work on jaunty? [18:11] ah, the joys of compiling on battery :) [18:11] ^^ [18:13] it feels great to be back though :) how's everyone been this summer? [18:26] is there any chance at all that http://revu.ubuntuwire.net/p/suvat will make it into karmic? [18:34] eh, can someone confirm that my math is not that bad ? :) [18:34] http://pastebin.com/d38b5910c [18:34] c_korn: 42 is bigger than 5... [18:36] RainCT_: ah, this way the versions are compared. thanks [18:55] W: suvat source: timewarp-standards-version (2009-08-07 < 2009-08-16) [18:55] what does that mean? [18:56] dutchie: that the standards-version you set was released at a date later than the date in the top entry of your debian/changelog [18:57] the top entry of debian/changelog is today [18:57] oops, no it's not [19:11] Any chance I could get an upload for the merge request in bug 420931? [19:11] Launchpad bug 420931 in zsync "zsync crashes with SIGSEGV when updating dvds" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/420931 === ripps_ is now known as ripps [20:52] I found a bug that I believe I can fix. You can see the bug here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mime-support/+bug/412444 [20:52] Launchpad bug 412444 in mime-support "typo in /etc/mime.types for epsi files" [Undecided,New] [20:53] this seems like something that should be reported upstream [20:53] how do I go about doing that? [20:53] or should I just fix it on Ubuntu? [21:01] What is the "upstream" for mime-support -- is it Debian? [21:02] I believe so [21:02] the LP page for that package doesn't say [21:02] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mime-support [21:13] czambran: are you sure Debian has the same bug? [21:17] yes, they do [21:17] I downloaded the source package from this url [21:17] http://packages.debian.org/lenny/mime-support [21:18] czambran: thanks. [21:18] Also Brian Warner confirmed on his Debian sid box. [21:18] where did you see that? [21:18] I am very new at this [21:18] I asked him over on #tahoe. [21:19] here [21:19] I'll paste the line.. [21:19] warner! [21:19] travis? whoa! [21:19] long time, man [21:19] So you should use launchpad and add to that ticket: "Also affects distribution" -> Debian [21:19] no kidding :) [21:19] Hey, shouldn't that be "effects" not "affects"? [21:19] Howdy Nafai. [21:20] I followed your medical crisis on twitter. [21:20] Strange how we live in science fiction. [21:20] that is pretty handy. It said "Debian doesn't use Launchpad as its bug tracker. Without a bug URL to watch, the Debian status will not update automatically" [21:20] and I clicked on the 'Add anyway' button [21:21] % grep espi /etc/mime.types [21:21] application/postscript ps ai eps espi epsf eps2 eps3 [21:21] Ah, so I guess now you need to open a debian bug report. :-) [21:21] zooko: Thanks. It's much less of a crisis now that I'm stable after the transplant. :) [21:22] I'm glad you are okay. [21:22] zooko, should I do it manually or install the program reportbug which they suggest I use? [21:24] czambran: if you've got a sid box, you should use reportbug.. it will include details like what version you've got installed [21:24] I haven't tried to install/run reportbug on an unbuntu box [21:25] I could always run another virtual machine. I will do that then [21:25] warner: :-( reportbug was utterly and horribly broken on Ubuntu from before the first release of Ubuntu until they finally after many years did something [21:25] ... [21:25] I learned how to submit patches for simple bugs. Should I submit one on the LP ticket? [21:25] czambran: it'll basically write the email for you and then hand it to you to add details and send it [21:26] Oh, I see. [21:26] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reportbug/+bug/123414 [21:26] Launchpad bug 123414 in reportbug "reportbug shouldn't unconditionally attempt to relay via fiordland" [Medium,Fix released] [21:26] reportbug reports bugs to *debian* when you run it on Ubuntu, provided you've configured it right. [21:28] trip down memory lane: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reportbug/+bug/228183/comments/12 [21:28] Launchpad bug 228183 in reportbug "Please remove broken reportbug from Ubuntu" [Medium,Fix released] [21:29] Hi, python package is installed into /usr/share/pyshared using cdbs by default, but this path is not in python-path. How to automaticaly create neccessary symlinks? [21:38] reportbug worked fine on Ubuntu Karmic [21:39] czambran: it opened a bug report in Debian? Sweet. [21:39] I think so [21:39] it didn't give any errors [21:39] I am waiting for the confirmation e-mail [21:41] zooko, should I post a patch on LP or just wait for warner to fix it upstream and then for Ubuntu to sync? [21:42] I don't think you should wait for warner to fix it. [21:42] Since he isn't the maintainer of it. [21:42] It doesn't hurt to post your patch on LP. [21:43] great [21:43] thanks a lot zooko [21:45] Nothing about this in python packaging guide... [21:45] Maybe after you get the DEbian bug report number you could add an "also effects distribution" tag on the LP ticket. [21:45] dundee: sorry, I don't know about that. [21:47] zooko: ok, thanks anyway [21:48] dundee: python-{support,central} create the necessary symlinks (depending on which the package use) [21:51] zooko, I will do that. I also subscribed ubuntu-main-sponsors to the ticket [21:57] geser: ah, thanks :) === cprov is now known as cprov-afk [22:31] andv: ping [22:32] c_korn, hi === micahg1 is now known as micahg [22:35] hi andv [22:35] scilab now builds in karmic [22:35] oh great [22:36] there is a new version in debian, too [22:36] which can be synced [22:36] is it a new upstream release? [22:36] do I need a FFe now ? [22:36] or just a new revision [22:36] just new revision [22:36] if it's a new revision (no new upstream release) it's ok [22:36] to sync it [22:36] fine (it is bug 414410 btw) [22:36] Launchpad bug 414410 in scilab "scilab 5.1.1-7 seems to FTBFS (sync request invalid for now)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/414410 [22:37] it is scilab 5.1.1-8 now [22:37] c_korn, added on TODOs [22:37] c_korn, will be done later or tomorrow morning [22:38] thanks. do I need to do something with the bug ? [22:38] update title or description ? [22:38] c_korn, yes, please move it to a proper sync request explaining the FTBFS has been fixed [22:38] c_korn, adding the -8 changelog revision would be nice as well [22:39] should I open a new bug or just change anything there ? [22:39] no need to open a new bug [22:40] change everything needed there [22:40] change bug title, plus update description with latest entry and informations about the fixed ftbfs [22:42] and then I gonna take care of it [22:45] done [22:46] c_korn, perfect [22:47] thanks :) [22:48] :) [22:48] thanks for fixing it [22:52] np [23:32] urgh [23:32] the package I want to use for my session doesn't respect DESTDIR [23:32] or whatever qmake does === lukjad007 is now known as Snovo === Snovo is now known as lukjad007 [23:36] what should I do to a bug report for something that seems to have been fixed in Karmic? [23:39] czambran: there is stock reply for that: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Fixed%20in%20Development%20release%20while%20still%20existing%20in%20a%20previous%20release [23:40] thanks Ampelbein === lukjad007 is now known as Snov1 [23:55] hmm, u-d-t broken