=== micahg1 is now known as micahg [01:00] * BUGabundo $ kick.user(BUGabundo)->bed(); === jtv1 is now known as jtv [07:28] morning [08:46] ejat: hey [08:47] so what is your langcode? ml or ms? [08:47] your firefox 3.0 translations should be visible in karmic now [08:47] did you check that yet? [08:49] ejat: ok seems it works# [08:49] but strings from xulrunner are not visible [08:49] and there is some brokenness [08:50] let me know when you are there so we can go through it [08:52] fta: for the applet build failures i oddly got the mails twice [08:52] one was sent to "asac@ubuntu.com" ... and one sent to "fta@ubuntu.com" ... [08:52] do you bounce the mails you get about that to me? [08:52] (if so its not needed, i seem to get the NM build failures) [08:53] From: Launchpad Buildd System [08:53] To: fta@ubuntu.com [08:53] Subject: [Build #1199218] amd64 build of network-manager-applet 0.8~a~git.20090831t222834.051c967-0ubuntu1~nmt1 in ubuntu [08:53] but good. seems that nm at least built [08:59] ok nma should be fixed now [09:07] uploaded manually to ppa ... hope this didnt break the bot :/ [09:08] in case it did ... let me know and i owe you one more beer fta ;) [09:08] but i think it dsidnt break it as the bot just looksa t daily branches afaik [10:24] good morning [11:16] asac, i don't understand the "applet build failures i oddly got the mails twice", i need to review the bot logs 1st === asac_ is now known as asac [15:52] mozilla bug 339782 [15:52] Mozilla bug 339782 in XPCOM "[ARM] XPTC_InvokeByIndex crashes when cross-compiled under GCC 3.4.x with EABI (CodeSourcery)" [Critical,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339782 [15:52] jcastro, *sigh* http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1255271 [15:53] hah, crossover [16:00] i thought i would get used to the notification in the right-middle of the screen, but most of the time, it's covering my work so it's getting in my way :( baaad [16:02] fta: is asac back? [16:02] yes [16:06] asac, any new for all-in-one? [16:06] * news [18:41] !eol intrepid [18:41] Sorry, I don't know anything about eol intrepid [18:41] hm [18:54] fta: april [19:20] micahg, thx === zbraniecki is now known as gandi [20:40] fta, there are some really nice gwibber bug fixes in r400 (lp:~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging) [20:40] fta, if you mind uploading :) [20:41] s/mind/don't mind === ripps_ is now known as ripps [20:42] kenvandine, you mean bumping the dailies or uploading to karmic? [20:43] karmic [20:43] it refreshes on startup, loads the proper default configs and tinyurl works again [20:43] great improvement to the first run experience :) [20:49] kenvandine, everything's possible but i'd prefer to wait a few more days between updates in karmic to collect more fixes. my guess is that most people are using gwibber from the ppa anyway, most through backports [20:49] asac, ^^, what do you think? [20:50] fta, i am fine with waiting... but would like at least one upload a week if we can [20:50] either way, it's trivial for me to do, 1 command for each :) [20:50] this one fixed the stuff people have noticed from the first run [20:50] like what you experienced [20:50] is fixed in this [21:06] imo ... one definitly should be a more verbose about the rational in sponsoring bugs :) otherwise its unlikely someone will sponsor if you dont ping them direclty ... and when asking direclty you dont need a sponsoring bug ;) [21:06] i have no opinion about how frequently uploads should happen [21:06] well i have one [21:07] basically i think one has to find a good balance between upstream worktime vs. packaging work time vs. preupload testing time [21:07] dailies are good because you dont need to do any QA [21:08] archive uploads should probably be of higher quality than what is in dailies ;) [21:08] so some kind of QA process is needed [21:08] in this case one also need to consider sponsoring resources [21:23] well, here, it fixes real bugs, but i just sponsored that package yesterday [21:23] it's not a matter of sponsoring resources for me, it's just 1 command [21:24] i'm concerned about too many updates in the repo without much QA or bake time in between [21:24] but fixes are always good to have [21:24] so i'm ready to reconsider [21:28] its at sponsors discretion what to do. [21:29] depends of course how long the previous fix was pending [21:30] if sponsor was responsive then waiting a few days between uploads is reasonable imo [21:30] like if no more commits happen in two days and the bits have been in daily, they should be good to go [21:33] here, it's just between kenvandine and me, afaik [21:41] hmm [21:41] bug 422829 [21:41] Launchpad bug 422829 in xulrunner-1.9.1 "mozilla-nss.pc is broken" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/422829 [21:41] did i just drop that patch? [21:41] otherwise we should probably say good bye to that nss pc hack and do it differently [21:52] hey [21:52] asac: ping [21:52] BUGabundo: yes [21:54] hey asac [21:54] well , boring fta and micahg1 again with this [21:54] but I'm trying to find the info [21:54] what is "this" ;)? [21:54] hi [21:54] you reported on sites that wrongly detect the browser [21:54] by looking for Firefox [21:55] instead of the proper user agent [21:55] depends on what sites those are ;) [21:55] to also include all other based on genko [21:55] yes [21:55] thats right [21:55] but everybody should complain to them ;) [21:56] I know [21:57] I want to complain *inside* where I was working until yesterday [21:57] they are doing it wrong too [21:57] but I was looking for some extra info to show them [21:58] https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Sardisson/Gecko_is_Gecko [21:58] thanks [21:58] thats pretty complete === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo [22:34] hi asac === micahg1 is now known as micahg [22:35] asac: you have time to talk about bugs [22:36] micahg: yes [22:36] hi! [22:36] hi! [22:36] how was your vacation? [22:36] bug 422365 [22:36] Launchpad bug 422365 in firefox-3.5 "[karmic] "ubuntu-bug firefox-3.5" has a traceback" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/422365 [22:36] too good ;) [22:37] the apport script doesn't instantiate the variable before using it [22:37] is this something worth pushing into karmic alpha 5? [22:37] no. but definitly important to fix [22:37] ok [22:37] I started with patching firefox [22:37] i assume the hook just looks for wrong folder ... now that we dont have .mozilla/firefox-3.5 anymore [22:37] probably [22:37] * asac checks [22:39] ok so thats not the problem ;)I [22:39] it checks for firefox [22:39] hey alex, had a chance to review / push all-in-one? [22:41] new queue is getting processed really fast [22:41] from 140 new, we have 40 now [22:43] oh, asac, can you check the patch I made for bug 66015 in the attached branch? [22:43] yes [22:43] Launchpad bug 66015 in hundredpapercuts "Duplicate spell checking dictionaries for every entry" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66015 [22:44] I was going to push it upstream [22:44] but figured I'd have you look at it first [22:46] micahg: fix committed [22:46] (for 422...) [22:47] cool [22:47] asac, I gave a release commit to the branch already [22:48] asac, if you need the link, I'm here to give you [22:53] one sec [22:58] * asac upgrades sid [22:58] sid? [22:58] lol [22:58] upgrade to squeeze? [22:59] squeeze is a downgrade... [22:59] eheheh [22:59] micahg, squeeze a downgrade? [22:59] since when? [22:59] it is [22:59] from experimental or sid [22:59] squeeze = testing sid=unstable [22:59] correct [22:59] yes [23:00] so if you from unstable to testing you don't do a downgrade [23:00] * move [23:00] yes, that's a downgrade [23:00] unstable is newer [23:00] uploaded [23:00] andv: ^^ [23:00] asac, thanks alex :9 [23:00] :) [23:00] micahg, depends from which view you see it [23:01] micahg, if you see it as 'newer' you're right [23:01] but if you see it as 'stable' [23:01] you're not right anymore [23:01] unstable is stable for Ubuntu :) [23:01] yeah [23:01] hehe [23:01] ^^ [23:01] so, asac, have you seen my patch yet? [23:02] no [23:02] now looking [23:02] I didn't get as much done while you were away as I would have likes [23:02] *liked [23:03] micahg: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31020349/inlineSpellCheckUI.patch ? [23:03] hehe [23:03] no [23:03] mine is in the bzr branch :) [23:03] lol [23:03] ah [23:03] * micahg forgot to add it the first time [23:03] micahg: 1st. use a proper email that is also known to launchpad for bzr [23:03] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/xulrunner-1.9.3.head.lp66015 [23:04] usually you should be linked to your profile like Fabien [23:04] ah, sorry [23:04] * micahg should fix that [23:04] let me lok at the patch though [23:04] can I jsut edit the id_rsa.pub file? [23:04] micahg, no [23:04] micahg: you should redo anyway. no need to submit a commit where you forgot the patch and then another commit ;) [23:04] you can bzr uncommit twice [23:04] micahg, there is a bzr command for that [23:04] and then commit with right email [23:05] how do I set the e-mail? [23:05] micahg, like launchpad identification [23:05] yes. the email has nothing to do with your .pub [23:05] i have [23:05] [DEFAULT] [23:05] email = Alexander Sack [23:05] launchpad_username = asac [23:05] in $HOME/.bazaar/bazaar.conf [23:05] I used a bzr command for LP identification [23:05] found that on a wiki somewhere in LP [23:06] yeah there isa launchpad command to mod the configs [23:06] i dont know it though [23:06] out of my head [23:06] found: launchpad-login Show or set the Launchpad user ID. [launchpad] [23:07] micahg: the patch looks fragile [23:08] there might be lang codes with more than 2 letters for instance [23:08] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31020349/inlineSpellCheckUI.patch [23:08] does that work? [23:11] feels like it doesntw ork either [23:12] http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/content/inlineSpellCheckUI.js [23:12] thats the code [23:12] http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/content/inlineSpellCheckUI.js#205 [23:12] like starting from there [23:12] there probably should be a dupe check [23:12] rather than omitting stuff that has - or _ [23:12] anyone running chromium in a non-us env? [23:12] so first: split by - _and_ _ [23:13] asac: I figured stopping the files from being loaded would be faster [23:13] then check for dupes before adding a new dictionary name [23:13] hmm [23:16] micahg: you could do the same there. alternatively you could resolve the realpath [23:16] and check that instead of the original leaf name found [23:17] asac: how do I fix the commited version [23:17] in LP [23:17] micahg: uncommit [23:17] two times [23:18] commit and push --overwrite [23:18] I did that oon my local coopy [23:18] ;) [23:18] ah [23:18] --overwrite [23:18] usually a bad idea to uncommit [23:18] but if its a private branch not consumed by developers/users its ok [23:21] micahg: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/io/nsIFile.idl [23:21] target vs. pathb [23:21] so you could test if target gives you something [23:22] and use the leaf name for that [23:22] ok, I'll have to look at this later [23:22] but i am not so sure when the dictionary actually gets loaded [23:22] so mayber the .js file is good enough to fix it [23:22] but I'm just trying to figure out this bzr thing [23:22] sure [23:22] I accidentally typed bzr merge [23:23] so I got a change from fta now [23:23] heh [23:23] micahg: if your stuff wasnt uncommitted yet [23:23] should I see my name in the commit screen? [23:23] you can run bzr revert [23:23] to removed the merge [23:23] unless you committed the merge ;) [23:23] then you need to uncommit and revert [23:23] micahg: bzr log | head [23:24] that should give the right email/name [23:25] micahg: you can run bzr whoami [23:25] i think [23:25] yeah [23:25] try that ;) [23:26] ah, now it looks good [23:26] grrr, my evolution bug never moved. [23:27] asac: my branch is fixed [23:27] as for the patch, I'll have to look over those documents [23:30] I like bzr so much more now [23:30] you can uncommit your local copy :) [23:38] asac: is abrowser the brand name for the unbranded browser? [23:56] asac: fta: micahg: google reader aint loading for me on FF 3.6 and 3.7 [23:56] even on safe-mode [23:57] poor BUGabundo [23:57] BUGabundo: did you try with changing your user agent? [23:57] don't tante with me [23:57] micahg: come on ..... [23:58] wfm [23:58] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20090901 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Minefield/3.7a1pre [23:58] ii xulrunner-1.9.3 1.9.3~a1~hg20090901r32130+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~jaunty