[09:40] morning guys [11:04] i hate gnome panels [11:13] is gwibber crashing for anyone else? [11:35] * gnomefreak hopes to have SM1.1.18 done today for review [12:01] gnomefreak: gwibber works for me [12:05] hmmm i cant clear windows for some reason it closes unexpectedly every time it runs [12:06] 2.0.0~bzr401-0ubuntu1~daily1 is the version i am running [12:11] hmm ... i probably have the previous verison [12:12] the previous version worked but i just couldnt send messages i havent had time to figure that out yet [12:19] i sent one message and it didnt crash [12:22] asac: ill play with it again after build finishes. [12:27] asac: did you get a chance to review sunbird? i will be AFK for a bit since build will slow me down alot [12:27] * gnomefreak off to build races :) [12:27] morning all...just installed the A5 of Karmic...with FF, my cookies are saving...I heard there was already a launchpad for this, but I cannot find it [12:27] asac: know the bug # for FF not saving cookies [12:28] eternal_p: 3.0 or 3.5 [12:28] 3.5 [12:29] as i recall there is a bug on it but i havent had a chance to do alot of our bugs in a week or so [12:29] see if i can find it before i start bild again [12:30] eternal_p: ok your bug is that it is saving cookies or its clearing them? [12:30] clearing them [12:30] or not saving them...if you will [12:31] did you cheak your settings to make sure [12:33] ok i dont see that bug. please file one after you check your settings. you can use Firefox>Help>report a problem [12:33] gnomefreak: no [12:33] firefox saves cookies for me [12:33] eternal_p: make sure your extensions are not causing this [12:33] asac: it does for me as well [12:34] micagh would know the bug id [12:34] but i guess he is asleep [12:34] yeah he doesnt get here for a while longer [12:36] I only have ad-block, xmarks and better gmail 2 [12:36] I'll start to disable them [12:36] got it [12:36] I had never remember history under privacy, thought that was just history, not everything [12:37] :) [12:37] be back in a bit [12:37] eternal_p: yeah its a bit confusing [12:38] use custom settings [12:38] is what you want i guess [12:38] now, if only I can get VMWAre Workstation going, I'm set :) [12:38] asac: already changed [12:38] use virtualbox [12:39] asac: not a fan of their USB2 implementation, too slow [12:44] * gnomefreak thinks i forgot something :( thinking autoconf [12:54] asac: this is the rejects http://paste.ubuntu.com/264922/ and this is our patch http://paste.ubuntu.com/264923/ what am i not seeing? [12:55] its the 38_mips64_build.patch IIRC someone was talking about mips (i think debian emails i get) [12:56] else [12:56] +ifeq ($(OS_TEST),mips64) [12:56] + CPU_ARCH = mips [12:56] +else [12:57] that is main patch of patch but all it is for most part is adding 64 to ostest mips [12:58] i'm off...thanks again [12:58] sorry the first link is wrong let me get right one [12:59] http://paste.ubuntu.com/264925/ is the rejects file [13:01] there has to be a way to auto update patches in quilt [13:05] auto update? [13:06] you have to run quilt refresh --diffstat -U8 --no-timestamps [13:06] after fixing it [13:06] gnomefreak: the mips thing is in the code [13:06] you can drop the patch most likely [13:06] but to fix it i have to copy/paste everything to our patch? or is there a way to take .rej and merge it [13:06] asac: ah ok [13:06] at lesat the mips thing is in the first paste [13:07] not sure if you applied it or somemthing [13:07] i will try it [13:07] yeah [13:07] well [13:07] you wont see a problem obviously on anything else than mips ... which we dont have in ubuntu ;) [13:07] but if the mips test is in the upstream tree then its fine to drop [13:08] asac: ok i will drop it and see how it goes [13:54] asac: what is kFreeBSD? the kbsd patch is failing but it looks like all we added was extra line for kfreebsd [13:54] gnomefreak: please try to keep it applying [13:54] its somethning i need for debian [13:55] kfreebsd is a debian system with glib, but on top of freebsd kernel [13:55] glibc i mean [13:55] i would love to keep it but every part of it is failing [13:55] yes [13:55] its just shuffeling a bit [13:55] you might want to checkout the icedove patch i have [13:56] maybe that works ;) [13:56] ok ill look [13:56] but maybe i just disabled it too ;) [13:56] if so do it ... but remember to enable again if i did it for iceowl [13:56] * gnomefreak thought of that but figured id ask first [13:58] iceowl or icedove? [13:59] * drop patches applied upstream [13:59] - remove debian/patches/18_kbsd_nspr.dpatch [13:59] - update debian/patches/series [13:59] that is in bzr branch revision 101 icedove [13:59] yes. the nspr stuff was applied as it seems [14:00] if its just the nspr part drop it [14:00] nss bits [14:01] http://paste.ubuntu.com/264951/ the first part bothers me since it doesnt mention nss or nspr [14:01] gnomefreak: thats not the nspr.patch [14:01] that patch still is needed most likely [14:02] ah thats 18 and i have 38 [14:02] yeah [14:02] its probably really just shuffeling the lines a bit [14:03] its a bunch of .rej, but all those should be pretty easy [14:03] to port [14:03] pretty = relatively [14:10] kenvandine: please make gwibber shorten url only if there is not enough space ;) [14:11] iceowl icedove dont have this patch at all [14:11] k [14:11] * gnomefreak was really hoping to cherry pick it [14:11] if you can adjust it, it would be great [14:11] one second [14:11] asac, good idea [14:11] 18_kbsd_nspr.dpatch [14:11] asac, please file a bug and assign it to me [14:12] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495522 [14:12] Debian bug 495522 in icedove "icedove: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD" [Important,Open] [14:12] gnomefreak: maybe the one in there still applied [14:12] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=icedove.diff.bz2;att=1;bug=495522 [14:12] extract it from that [14:12] asac: looking [14:17] kenvandine: bug 424321 [14:17] Launchpad bug 424321 in gwibber "only shorten urls if there is not enough space" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424321 [14:18] thx! [14:18] my solution is a bit tricky, but i think the user experience would be remarkable if it would be really "as-you-type" (in both directions) [14:19] hope the description is clear kenvandine [14:59] almost like fixing the kbsd patch now one more fails :( not even sure why its only in seamonkey not tbird [15:02] why the hell do i have this patch and no other package does [15:06] asac_: why is seamonkey the only package that has the 80_security_build.patch? [15:06] whats in there? [15:07] hold on ill pastebin it [15:07] asac_: http://paste.ubuntu.com/264980/ [15:09] i lied it seems iceape does as well but you use seamonkey to build iceape as i recall [15:10] and your iceape branch is ~2 years old [15:16] i get the feeling CVE-2009-2408: Compromise of SSL-protected communication is why the failures [15:36] PGO is blocking 3.6 from what im seeing [15:49] mailing list crap is done out of ~60 only 3 were accepted, there has to be an easier way to do this [16:00] well gwibber is still broken, cant clear refresh or send [16:00] no longer crashing [16:23] who is our resident gwibber maintainer? [17:11] gnomefreak: poke kenvandine [17:11] yo [17:11] gnomefreak, hey neighbor [17:11] I was just selling you out [17:11] kenvandine: gwibber wont let me do anything send refresh clear [17:11] i heard :) [17:11] ok... what version? [17:12] kenvandine: 2.0.0~bzr406-0ubuntu1~daily1 [17:12] gnomefreak, kill it and run both the daemon and the client in a terminal [17:12] to get output [17:12] so kill both the gwibber and gwibber-daemon processes [17:12] and run gwibber-daemon first [17:12] then gwibber [17:12] to get some output [17:13] * gnomefreak waits for gwibber-daemon to give me something [17:13] kenvandine: so far only WARNING:root:desktopcouch is not available. . falling back to gconf [17:14] yeah [17:14] is it working? [17:14] does it start working and later fail? [17:15] kenvandine: you mean the deamon/ [17:15] ? [17:15] either [17:15] ah here we go [17:15] hi gnomefreak [17:15] hi micahg [17:16] I was referring to Ubuntu source package when I was asking about fspot [17:16] kenvandine: her eis output http://paste.ubuntu.com/265049/ [17:16] micahg: oh ok [17:16] HTTPError: HTTP Error 502: Bad Gateway [17:16] humm [17:16] gnomefreak, please file a bug with that info [17:16] I was just wondering whether to move it out of the thunderbird package for the request in Ubuntu [17:16] make sure you reference your version number too [17:17] urllib is failing to talk to twitter [17:19] sorry about that, ok going to file bug [17:20] damn === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [17:21] ok much better [17:25] fta: can you kickoff a new NM trunk round? [17:25] thx [17:28] kenvandine: bug 424433 if you need more info let me know [17:28] Launchpad bug 424433 in gwibber "Gwibber wont let me do anything" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424433 [17:28] thx dude! [17:28] kenvandine: np and thanks for the assist [17:35] asac_, sure, done [17:36] fta: rock!! [17:37] i dont like the new http://launchpad.net/builders [17:38] me neither === mac__v is now known as mac_v [18:26] fta: did the "tip" bustage work out well in the end? [18:27] or will we see this again if they tag SM or something else? [18:27] i didn't change anything [18:35] yeah next commit probably would have fixed the tip [18:35] so thats what probably happened === asac_ is now known as asac [19:20] asac: hi, did you see my conversation with rs last night in the mozilla developers channel about bug 411691? [19:20] Launchpad bug 411691 in firefox "many Exception... "update.locale file doesn't exist" in console" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/411691 [19:21] micahg: i saw that you discuseed something [19:21] micahg: thats tbird 3? [19:22] feels like the update feature is not properly disabled [19:22] well [19:22] it was a problem when --disable-updater is used like we do [19:23] ok [19:23] so upstream regression [19:23] nice [19:23] good catch [19:23] you really see that in firefox too? [19:23] or is it just mint that have that? [19:23] so he said we can either touch the file in the gre.d dir until it's fixed upstream ot comment out the app.udater preference [19:23] app.updater [19:23] yeah [19:23] I see it in 3.5.2 [19:24] so, I can make the change/patch, just wondering which one you preferred? [19:24] i am not sure what "comment out app.update" preference means [19:24] the updater is currently tied into another component and he'll be removing it in trunk soon [19:24] remove it from the preference file before installing I think [19:24] what is the impact of that issue? [19:24] is it just noise in error console [19:24] just an annoyance [19:24] yeah [19:24] doesn't hurt anything [19:24] then lets not patch it [19:24] errors on the console [19:24] well [19:24] rather wait for upstream fix [19:25] and ensure that it gets landed on 1.9.1 branch [19:25] ah [19:25] he said the full aptch wouldn't land on 1.9.1 [19:25] lets waiut for the patch first [19:25] ok [19:25] we can milestone it so we dont forget [19:25] in case they dont patch it in time for release [19:26] I just figured it would be a nice easy fi xfor karmic [19:26] ok milestone for beta? [19:26] at best RC [19:26] or final [19:26] beta is soonish [19:26] ok [19:26] RC or final? [19:26] if RC is available use that [19:26] I don't see RC :) [19:26] yeah so final [19:26] i think they didnt add all steps [19:26] final is supposed to be RC [19:27] as nothing can be fixed after RC usually [19:27] should I leave myself assigned to it? [19:27] sure [19:27] ;) [19:27] oh [19:27] in that way we are less likely to forget [19:27] I had a crazy problem when building ff3.7 [19:27] how so? [19:27] when I ran bzr bd, I get a firefox-3.7-firefox-3.7 dir now [19:28] the first time it worked fine [19:28] maybe I shoudl start with a fresh checkout [19:28] bzr bd --merge? [19:28] yeah [19:28] micahg: feels like you have busted the version in changelog [19:28] bzr diff debian/changelog [19:28] topmost line [19:28] I did a bzr merge first to get updates that I was missing [19:28] you probably have moved from 3.7-.... to firefox-3.7-... [19:28] by accident [19:28] when copying the new snapshot version [19:29] micahg: no bzr bd --merge just means that it unpacks the orig and applies the bzr tree on top [19:29] ah [19:29] I did :) [19:29] hehe [19:29] yeah [19:29] nice catch [19:29] makes sense [19:29] asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31318967/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.firefox-3.5_3.5.4~hg20090904r26332%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd1~jaunty_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [19:30] asac: I'm working on the firefxo real patch [19:31] fta: thx for the reminder [19:31] maybe i can fix it for tomorrows build ... is more tricky for 1.9.1 branch as the whole nspr code parts are much more dirty than on 3.6/3.7 [19:32] had to do NM stuff today [19:33] micahg: do you know what to do? [19:33] yeah [19:33] great [19:33] jsut ahd trouble getting it to build [19:33] well [19:34] hehe [19:34] ;) [19:34] I'll let you know how it goes [19:34] now it should work [19:34] firefox is a quick build [19:34] because you dont need the full xul [19:35] ok [19:35] well, I'll have to check it over the weekend [19:36] need to get some work done [19:36] oh, asac one more bug I wanted to ask you about [19:36] kk [19:37] shoot [19:37] bug 418203 [19:37] Launchpad bug 418203 in firefox-3.5 ""Mozilla Firefox for Ubuntu canonical - 1.0" doesn't make sense" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/418203 [19:37] should the Version be 1.0 [19:37] it's in the distribution.ini file [19:37] i dont know ;) [19:37] i think its correct [19:37] the info is also used somewhere else [19:38] like in the url for extension update etc. [19:38] we were told to use that file [19:38] i think its for metrics use [19:38] but i will check with moz [19:38] ok [19:45] micahg: ok sent him a mail [19:48] thanks asac [20:18] asac, fta@cube:/data/bot/xulrunner-1.9.2.head $ bzr pull [20:18] Using saved parent location: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.2.head/ [20:18] bzr: ERROR: These branches have diverged. Use the missing command to see how. [20:19] did you uncommit something? [20:19] fta: no [20:19] i dont think i uncommitted anything [20:19] i didnt touch that branch since yesterday [20:20] fta: what is your latest commit? [20:20] which revision and what is the comment? [20:21] http://paste.ubuntu.com/265124/ [20:23] fta: you committed a new upstream release locally as it seems [20:23] and forgot to push [20:23] hmm [20:23] odd [20:23] thats old [20:24] i definitly didnt overwrite [20:24] the bot pulls & pushes everyday [20:24] i dont do that anymore ;) [20:24] yes [20:24] i noticed the divergence in today's log [20:24] but it's older [20:24] when did it start? [20:25] are you sure that you pushed that release commit? [20:25] does the bot do automatic release commits? [20:28] the 1st action is to make sure the packaging branch is in sync, so the bot checks for local uncommitted change (and abort, which is not so great), then push & pull [20:34] fta: well. the bot uses merge to .daily afaik [20:34] hmm, system zlib error: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31321980/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.chromium-browser_4.0.207.0~svn20090904r25449-0ubuntu1~ucd2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [20:34] fta: for me its a mystery. push the branch somewhere and i can rebase the .head branch on top of it [20:35] asac, i've overwritten mine, nm [20:35] ok [20:35] so no release? [20:35] hmm [20:35] ok [20:35] bzr rebase is _supposed_ to work well [20:35] ;) [20:35] but i think its still a mess ;) [20:35] would have loved to try [20:38] !info zlib1g jaunty [20:38] zlib1g (source: zlib): compression library - runtime. In component main, is required. Version 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12ubuntu2 (jaunty), package size 73 kB, installed size 168 kB [20:38] !info zlib1g karmic [20:38] zlib1g (source: zlib): compression library - runtime. In component main, is required. Version 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13ubuntu1 (karmic), package size 75 kB, installed size 168 kB [20:38] hm [20:40] should really ship that minizip [20:49] fta: this minizip thing isnt even a lib in upstream tree [20:49] chromium just links the .o files that usually go into a binary [21:07] asac_, chromium just needs the .h iirc [21:08] heya [21:10] asac, it only affects karmic, weird [21:11] asac ping [21:24] asac, http://codereview.chromium.org/16605 [21:47] yeah [21:47] so just add the files to zip and get that upstreamed :) [21:47] i mean to libzlib :) [21:47] asac about those stupid dongles that force a disk drive [21:47] or whatever lib is shipped by our lib [21:47] BUGabundo: thats a different issue [21:47] I've asked several users to report bugs [21:47] BUGabundo: karmic has a bunch of improvements for that [21:47] but I don't think anyone opend one [21:48] I don't have one of those stupid ones [21:48] asac I got it was a diff prob [21:48] did those try karmic? [21:48] I inicially though it was it, but then you made it clear [21:48] asac nope, jaunty or older [21:48] yeah [21:48] thats not working [21:48] all the udev stuff that automatically does that isnt in jaunty or older iirc [21:48] ok [21:49] but i think almo0st everything should work nowadays [21:49] otherwise i want bugs for sure [21:49] so karmic should detect those devices and work ok, with NM/MM dectecting the modem ? [21:49] does the PPA version fix it ? [21:49] I could ask for logs, running PPA [21:51] asac on another topic [21:51] i think so [21:51] i need feedback [21:51] can NM use my android as a 3,5 Modem ? [21:51] via USB/wifi/BT on karmic? [21:51] most users probably dont run karmic yet even though it would be nice to get info now [21:51] when we can still fix things without rushing all the tiem [21:52] I know [21:52] BUGabundo: i dont have an android [21:52] let me know if it worked [21:52] I keep telling ppl to run a livecd/ubb [21:52] try usb first [21:52] yeah [21:52] its connected via usb now [21:52] I can run anything you want me too [21:52] well. [21:52] you probably have to first configure android phone [21:52] to be a modem [21:53] have you found that setting? [21:53] oh and before we go into it: when can we have those improvements on MM with signal strenthg and etc? its not on trunk yet [21:53] asac I'll look on the foruns how to do it, I have no idea on how to set it as a modem [21:58] BUGabundo: let me know if you find something about android as modem [21:58] BUGabundo: the signal strength etc. is coming [21:59] definitly for karmic [21:59] finally [21:59] we have a few more applet changes in the pipeline [21:59] asaci was hopping MM did some _black_ magic and figured it has a modem there [21:59] it would be awesome [21:59] well. if androis is not configured to be a modem then there is no modem [21:59] Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13ubuntu2 [77.3kB] [21:59] there's an update :S [21:59] similar to phones that have are not setup as modems [22:00] * BUGabundo goes searching forums [22:01] asac i got this http://code.google.com/p/android-wifi-tether/ for wifi and bt [22:01]