[00:16] cjwatson: fyi, heading out for the day (and long weekend). I did find out a few things on bug #423485 if you want to llok at it more [00:16] Launchpad bug 423485 in valgrind "Valgrind needs to be recompiled for glibc 2.10" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/423485 [00:16] cjwatson: if not, I can look at it next week [01:40] asac: I can't figure it out. [01:41] asac: it seems there's support for the XPCOM stuff from reading the source code, it's just linking/compiling/something wrong. [01:41] asac: messing with configure for a while (could just edit the .m4 and autoreconf, because something else's broken..) proved useless. [01:43] asac: tho I did pop in a karmic live cd and reproduced the problem finding libxul (or whatever the message was) when running gnome-web-photo, so my results match up with the bug reported not dholbach. [01:44] asac: anyways, if you could give me a hint, maybe.. :) [01:44] asac: everything I do I get undefined references. [01:45] pitti, ArneGoetje: are these language-support-translations-* packages meant to be demoted to universe? [01:47] pitti: er, you're dropping the cupsys transitional packages that are still used on upgrade from hardy? [02:38] Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I think it is: how do I find out what configuration and make options were used to generate an Ubuntu binary package? [02:39] I need to deploy new version of Proftpd and I wanted to make sure I used the same configuration parameters the normal Ubuntu package is built with [02:39] pburleson: usually by looking at it's debian/rules file. [02:40] in the source package? [02:40] yes. [02:40] thank you [02:40] tho for some packages, it requires knowledge of debhelper/CDBS/etc. [02:40] oh, fun === s8n is now known as vorian [03:58] jcastro: Is this you: http://video.linuxfoundation.org/users/canonical ? [04:31] YokoZar1: no, I have no idea how that got on there [04:48] jcastro: well it's a good outlet as I got an email from a Wine dev who didn't see it until it was there === jussi01 is now known as _ === _ is now known as jussi01 === Kmos_ is now known as Kmos === Kmos is now known as Guest14733 === Guest14733 is now known as Kmos [11:55] Ryan52: how are you trying to link now? [12:05] Hi. The run dialog isn't working after yesterdays update. is it a known problem? [12:05] and pulseaudiu doesn't sound out anything [12:05] Error MEssage from teh Run dialog: "Unable to load file '/usr/share/gnome-panel/glade/panel-run-dialog.glade'" === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter [13:40] cjwatson, fyi, the new zlib in karmic is causing me some troubles: http://paste.ubuntu.com/265545/ [13:43] hi [13:44] when uploading to my ppa, i get File already exists in , but uploaded version has different contents. [13:44] but i don't really understand why [13:44] am i forced to bump the version number? [13:49] moldy, you're sending a source package with the same .orig.tar.gz name but not the same content (different md5/sha). See -sa vs -sd [13:50] fta: hm, ok, i think i begin to understand :) [13:50] i added the chromium zlib log fta gave me to the bug 402178 [13:50] Launchpad bug 402178 in libpciaccess "gzopen64 implicitly converted to pointer" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/402178 [13:50] fta: i am changing the source along with the ubuntu package... i guess the solution is to just delete the package from the ppa and upload it again [13:51] moldy, no [13:51] moldy, just redo your source package with -sd instead of -sa [13:51] fta: will try that, thanks [13:56] fta: hm, same results [13:58] moldy, either you don't include the .orig.tar.gz in the dsc (as i said), or you have to reuse the exact same tarball already in the archives [13:58] moldy, this question is more for #ubuntu-motu btw [13:59] hm, maybe i included the orig.tar.gz by accident [13:59] fta: ok, thank you [14:07] hm, the thing is, i am using -sd, but orig.tar.gz still seems to end up in the dsc... [14:07] moldy: -sd controls the .changes file [14:07] the .orig.tar.gz always has to be in the .dsc [14:08] for the checksum [14:09] ok, i see. but then i still don't understand why i get that error e-mail [14:09] well, it applies to all the parts, not just the .diff.gz [14:09] so if you are re-using a version number that is in Ubuntu or in your PPA then you will likely see it [14:10] hm, the error message only complains about the orig.tar.gz [14:10] well, you uploaded the orig.tar.gz then [14:10] -sd should have stopped that, but maybe you didn't upload what you expected to [14:10] hm, i will re-check this [14:10] when you're talking about -sd, you are talking about dpkg-buildpackage? [14:11] yeah [14:16] ok, the dput output said it uploaded the .dsc, the .diff.gz and the .changes [14:16] ... but i still get that error e-mail :( [14:17] now both for the .orig.tar.gz and the .diff.tar.gz [14:23] siretart: would you mind to join #ubuntu-mozillateam for a while ;) ... on ffmpeg. [14:28] slangasek: language-support-translations-*> please leave them for now, they will be removed once the new language-selector is uploaded [14:28] slangasek: cupsys transitional packages> eww, forgot; will re-add them [14:29] moldy: ah, I remember it's comparing the checksums, even though you don't upload it [14:29] moldy: use the same .orig.tar.gz that is in the archive when building [14:30] but still use -sd [14:40] james_w: ok, will try that, thank you [14:42] james_w: will just bumping the version number also work? i'm beginning to think it's the easiest solution [14:54] james_w: now it complains that orig.tar.gz is missing "in upload or distribution" :) i'm giving up, trying to see if another version number works === asac__ is now known as asac [16:04] is anyone noticing underruns when something is playing sound, and something else interrupts it? [16:05] My guess would be is that pulseaudio expects a lower latency than it can actually achieve, because rtkit isn’t able to provide that for it, because the kernel patch isn’t added to Ubuntu yet. [16:13] hi .whats wrong with libldb-samba4-0 [16:22] will evolution-mapi see some love before karmic release? [18:02] why software-store over gnome-packagekit? if something is wrong with it, would it not be better to fix it? ubuntu specific things required? is that really a good thing? === johanbr__ is now known as johanbr [20:23] asac: I dunno, I just messed around for a while...I don't really have a clue what I'm doing when it comes to this XPCOM glue stuff :) === dyfet` is now known as dyfet [20:44] fta: I thought that's what mvo was fixing; if he broke it, best check with him rather than me [20:45] cjwatson, ok [21:08] pitti: ok. btw, those uninstallable gnome langpack packages are the current cause of Ubuntu DVD build failures [21:09] anyone have any idea where bug 70317 ought to be fixed? [21:09] Launchpad bug 70317 in ubuntu "constant kernel errors about unknown multimedia keys" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70317 [21:09] jelmer: bug #424626> anything I can do to help with getting the new version into karmic, then? [21:09] Launchpad bug 424626 in bzr-svn "bzr-svn breaks https:// urls?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424626 [21:10] cjwatson: either udev or the kernel [21:10] (depending on whether the key presses are already recognized - kernel - or not - udev) [21:11] if I reassign it to udev, won't Scott just tell me that some console package should be figuring out the keyboard in use and installing a udev rule? :-) [21:12] (and he might have a point, unless udev already has keyboard stuff in it ...) [21:12] udev does have keyboard stuff in it [21:12] /lib/udev/keymaps [21:13] ah, does it now - that's new since I last looked [21:13] part of the halsectomy :) [21:13] the current iteration of the report is on 9.04 so it may predate that [21:14] I don't think there are /currently/ any keymaps in place for non-laptop keyboards (I see now this is a Microsoft wireless keyboard), but no reason there can't / shouldn't be [21:15] OTOH, if these are "power status messages" that shouldn't register as keys at all, then it may yet be a kernel bug [21:17] well, I've learned something today, thanks [21:17] reassigned the bug [21:17] :) [22:03] you guys happen to know what might cause having to resume twice after suspend in order to get it to actually resume? [22:31] LaserJock: double suspend event handling [22:31] possibly because of buggy hotkey configuration [22:32] I noticed that at least some of my laptop's function keys no longer work [22:33] but I'm somewhat hardware-illiterate as almost always Ubuntu just works on my hardware [22:34] slangasek: what would be a likely package to look for bugs of this kind? [22:36] LaserJock: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hotkeys/Troubleshooting [22:37] slangasek: awesome, thanks [22:41] with xev, if I press a keyboard key should I expect 2 events? like one for pressing down and one for releasing? [22:42] yes [22:42] (if it's a key that's passed via X) [22:42] ok === ulaas_ is now known as ulaas === ulaas_ is now known as ulaas