/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/09/08/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

eagles0513875*TEAR*00:12
fta?00:14
eagles0513875fta2: my grandmother is on the way out00:42
eagles0513875her spirit is already gone but her body is still in this world00:42
micahgsorry to hear that eagles051387500:43
eagles0513875thanks mich00:43
eagles0513875micahg:00:43
eagles0513875sry im outa it  semi tipsy depressed the wors00:44
eagles0513875eworks00:44
micahgasac: will you be updating seamonkey in Ubuntu to 1.1.18?01:17
micahgasac: nevermind, I see the related bug01:22
micahgfta: has there been any talk of adding seamonkey to your buildbot?01:29
dholbachhi guys06:03
dholbachdoes anybody have an idea about bug 424727?06:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 424727 in tuxguitar "Please build tuxguitar with xulrunner 1.9.1 for karmic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42472706:03
dholbachand bug 30573806:05
ubottuLaunchpad bug 305738 in ubuntu "[karmic] Please review and sponser flashgot " [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30573806:05
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
eagles0513875hey asac08:03
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
* gnomefreak wonders why gnome-panel isnt loading all the way10:10
eagles0513875hey gnomefreak10:17
gnomefreakeagles0513875: hi10:17
eagles0513875hope all is better for ya then for me10:17
gnomefreakeagles0513875: yeah so far how are you doing?10:18
eagles0513875bad10:18
eagles0513875lost my grandmother yesterday10:18
eagles0513875im kinda an emotional wreck atm10:18
gnomefreakeagles0513875: sorry to hear that :(10:20
eagles0513875thanks so im kinda outa helping here for a lil while :(10:20
eagles0513875will have to let asac know10:21
dholbachgnomefreak: I'm sorry to hear that  :-/10:22
dholbachdoes anybody have an idea about bug 424727?10:22
ubottuLaunchpad bug 424727 in tuxguitar "Please build tuxguitar with xulrunner 1.9.1 for karmic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42472710:22
dholbachasac: what about bug 305738?10:22
ubottuLaunchpad bug 305738 in ubuntu "[karmic] Please review and sponser flashgot " [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30573810:22
gnomefreakdholbach: that was done in review (flashgot)10:23
dholbachgnomefreak: so... shall I unsuscribe the sponsors?10:23
gnomefreaki left before someone sponsored it yesterday so not sure if it was10:23
gnomefreakdholbach: yes please10:23
dholbachthanks a bunch gnomefreak10:23
dholbachdone10:24
gnomefreakdholbach: np thanks for reminding me sponsors were subscribed10:24
dholbachdon'T worry - I was just going through the list today again10:24
gnomefreakim wondering if my problem with gdu-notification is the same as everyone elses. i will look at it later if chrisccoulson  doesnt get back to me10:25
andvgood morning10:25
gnomefreakok lets look at the bug above10:26
gnomefreakandv: morning10:26
andvgnomefreak, flashgot will be pushed today ;)10:26
gnomefreakandv: thanks10:26
andvgnomefreak, you used the wrong revid yesterday10:26
andvhad to fix that10:26
gnomefreakandv: i used what the output said10:26
andvgnomefreak, rev 4 was the right one10:27
andv* rev 510:27
andvsorry10:27
andvthe one without debian dir on it10:27
andvgive a bzr log into the branch and you find it10:28
gnomefreakandv: why rev4?10:29
andvgnomefreak, rev 510:29
andvtimestamp: Tue 2009-08-04 08:08:58 -040010:29
andvmessage:10:29
andv    * New upstream version 1.210:29
eagles0513875andv: wont be helping out here for a lil bit due to a death in the family10:30
gnomefreakandv: shouldnt it still use the latest?10:30
andveagles0513875, sorry to hear that : /10:30
eagles0513875thanks andv10:30
andveagles0513875, don't worry and take your time10:30
andvgnomefreak, that's the latest upstream commit10:30
gnomefreakok im guessing that its only the first rev of new version10:30
andvyep10:31
andvthe only revision without debian dir10:31
andvin it10:31
eagles0513875in the mean time i can test stuff out on kde if yall want me to10:31
andveagles0513875, unlucky we are all running gnome here10:31
eagles0513875hehe10:31
eagles0513875well if you need a kde tester you got me :)10:32
eagles0513875doesnt the work you do also go towards kde and other wm10:32
eagles0513875wm's10:32
gnomefreaknow that is a good question. dholbach shouldnt xulrunner-1.9.1 be enough im thinking the last .1 is security update10:32
dholbachI have no idea10:33
andvdholbach, any news with gnome-web-photo?10:33
dholbachI just think there must be a clever way of glob'ing the right directory without hardcoding 1.9.1.210:33
dholbachandv: no10:33
gnomefreaki was thinking it was but asac or fta would know better10:34
* dholbach nod10:34
dholbachs10:34
* gnomefreak stays as far away from xul as possible :)10:34
dholbachI see :)10:34
eagles0513875j/w then since yall work on gnome is there a kubuntu-mozillateam??10:35
gnomefreakeagles0513875: nope there is no need since there is no QT support10:37
eagles0513875gotcha10:37
eagles0513875but if you want a kde tester im here and have a vm :)10:37
eagles0513875so i can test without fear of screwing up my system10:37
gnomefreakatm *-gnome-support should help with alot of problems with QT10:38
gnomefreakat least it was10:38
* eagles0513875 will install firefox after uninstalling blackbox wm10:40
gnomefreakthis is going to be way too big to pastebin10:42
gnomefreakbe back i need to restart to see if i can get useful debug info10:47
eagles0513875andv: would me testing the stuff yall are working on help since im on kde10:48
andvnot really I guess10:48
andvI used kde one time and didnt feel comfortable with it10:49
andvthat's a matter of choice10:49
eagles0513875how do you guys find bugs that dont show up in gnome but in kde10:49
eagles0513875i know10:49
eagles0513875would i be of any use for u guys since im on kde10:49
andvyou can do packaging-related stuff on kde as well10:50
andvyou'll just need a console10:50
andvand an editor10:50
andvand packaging tool which are available on kde as well10:51
eagles0513875ya would packaging on a vm do the trick?10:56
andvyeah, maybe your builds will be a less slow10:56
andvbut if you have a good pc that's ok10:57
eagles0513875hehe dont even get me started on this rig lol10:58
eagles0513875wait isnt the stuff built on the launchpad build servers they have10:58
andvyess, but u can build your stuff on your own10:59
eagles0513875dont you run the risk though of having a tainted build though11:00
andvnope, everything is done into a clean chroot11:01
eagles0513875ok hehe i might have a number of failed attempts11:02
eagles0513875tbh i wish i wasnt running a vm11:03
eagles0513875cuz i have a monster rig11:03
eagles0513875hehe might end up as the senior packager of the team here for the rig i got11:03
andvyou're learning, so that's normal11:03
eagles0513875ya :)11:03
andvyou should follow some packaging sessions11:03
andvask dholbach about them, he's the organizer11:03
eagles0513875ya i should11:04
eagles0513875im gonna be heading to an ubuntu desktop meeting today11:04
eagles0513875hopefully i have a suggestion for 10.04 which is kinda taken from what microsoft was forced to do with win 7 lol11:04
* gnomefreak going to yell :(11:04
eagles0513875gnomefreak: want me to test something im willing to install gnome11:05
gnomefreakwe are trying to keep areselves from being too much like WIn :)11:05
eagles0513875no but its a good idea11:05
eagles0513875and i understand that11:05
eagles0513875for instance when your installing ubuntu11:05
eagles0513875somewhere in the installer you choose your browsers and it pulls it from the repos11:06
eagles0513875while its getting installed11:06
eagles0513875for instance if you dont like the default gnome browser why not install it but install firefox for instance11:06
gnomefreaki thought of that with something else (not sure what it was) but decided not to file it11:06
eagles0513875this though would be beneficial11:07
gnomefreakaqh it was empiphany vs firefox11:07
eagles0513875even for office suites11:07
gnomefreakand tbird vs evo11:07
eagles0513875gnomefreak: then give users options on what they want during installation11:07
eagles0513875on the kde side its koffice v open office11:07
eagles0513875then browser choices11:07
gnomefreakIIRC redhat and or suse allows this11:07
eagles0513875why not incorporate it into the ubuntu line11:07
gnomefreakthey give you an option to install what you want during install11:08
eagles0513875that would be super nice to have not to mention you would cut down alot of fluff im sure on the live cd11:08
gnomefreakthat would be installer team11:08
eagles0513875but asac told me to go to ubuntu-desktop meetings11:09
eagles0513875regarding the koffice v oo for some reason11:09
eagles0513875is there a kubuntu-desktop channel or does ubuntu-desktop do it for all11:10
gnomefreakeagles0513875: i dont think kubuntu has any channels other than #kubuntu kubuntu-ot #kubuntu-dev11:11
eagles0513875ok11:12
gnomefreakot = offtopic and dev == devel11:12
eagles0513875rest falls under the ubuntu channels11:12
gnomefreakeagles0513875: sort of. i doubt the guys in #ubuntu-desktop are going to be any help. you really should talk to a #kubuntu-devel op to find out if ban can be released because you have a feature request but we are not too concerned with features for next release yet. maybe best to file a bug on it but talking to the op that banned you may help also11:13
eagles0513875i think talkign to him would only benefit me i think in my dreams11:14
gnomefreakthis command isnt going to end :( be back while it runs its already been ~10 minutes11:14
gnomefreakeagles0513875: who banned you?11:14
eagles0513875ikonia11:14
gnomefreakok be back in a few.11:15
eagles0513875he hates me guts out i basically cant do very much to contribute to the community11:15
andveagles0513875, why he banned  you?11:22
eagles0513875i dont even remember11:23
eagles0513875he thinks i waste peoples time11:23
eagles0513875when all i do is wanna learn11:23
andvyou got banned from which channels?11:23
gnomefreakok down to a few things on to do list. one of these days sunbird needs to be pushed it fixes ~5 bugs11:23
gnomefreaki will ask ikonia in a few11:24
andvgnomefreak, who is he?11:24
* gnomefreak should have ops in that channel but dont recall if its only the IRCC that has rights11:24
gnomefreakandv: hes an op/ cant recall his name11:25
gnomefreakok asked for a pm11:25
gnomefreaknow i wait11:25
eagles0513875? im lost11:25
* gnomefreak not so lost yet but give me time :)11:28
gnomefreakthis file is too big for Lp to handle i think11:30
andvwhich file?11:30
gnomefreak7/8 MB11:31
gnomefreakandv: debug file11:31
gnomefreak7.8 even11:31
andvgnomefreak, I fixed our emails as well yesterday11:35
andvgnomefreak, you forget to leave a space and bzr merge had some conflicts11:36
gnomefreakandv: oh :( space between <email>? should be < email >?11:36
eagles0513875gnomefreak: i dunno what i should do about my ban11:36
andvnope, [ name <email> ]11:37
andvspace between [ and name11:37
gnomefreaki did have that i thought but i would have to look back at it but thanks for fixing it11:38
andvikonia, new dude wanting to learn packaging bits?11:38
ikoniaandv: I'm quite fine at packaging thanks11:38
ikoniaI'll package something up for you if you want though11:38
eagles0513875hehe11:39
ikoniaeagles0513875: you're ban has been discussed and explained to you - so please stop discussing it with other people11:39
andvikonia, he got banned?11:39
ikoniaandv: not for this channel11:40
gnomefreakthat was my bad for asking who/why11:41
ikonianot at all11:41
ikoniaI just saw the comment in this channel that he didn't know what to do about it11:41
ikoniahe does know what to do - it was explaied 3 - 4 days ago11:41
gnomefreakhe had feature request for Kubuntu-live disk and i told him to ask in #k*-devel he said he couldnt11:41
gnomefreakxchat i take it?11:42
ikoniagnomefreak: understandable11:42
* gnomefreak hasnt seen as*ac yet this morning is he ok?11:43
eagles0513875good question on that gnomefreak i need to fix the wiki i was that i was working on with the extension bugs and what not i had filed yesterday as per his request11:44
gnomefreakeagles0513875: what wiki?11:44
andvgnomefreak, he went to sleep late yesterday night11:45
* gnomefreak hopes it the packaging wiki11:45
gnomefreakandv: ah thanks11:45
eagles0513875nope not that wiki11:45
eagles0513875the one for the extensions11:45
eagles0513875that i was fililng bugs for so that the ones that are not using the correct stuff can be redone11:45
gnomefreakoh that one. you can mark flashgot as done :)11:45
* gnomefreak forgot about that wiki with all the extensions i was working on. but this ice* crap is getting to me in package names11:46
gnomefreaknoone is touching the bug on it to remove them11:46
eagles0513875gnomefreak: you might want to consult asac in regards to marking stuff as done im not sure if he wants to give anythign a looking over before marking it as done11:48
gnomefreakeagles0513875: its reviewed and being pushed today11:48
eagles0513875if asac gets up lol11:48
gnomefreakhim and andv reviewed it11:48
eagles0513875kool kool not sure though to mark it as done it has to be pushed already or not11:49
* gnomefreak had to fix a few things in it to get it pushed11:49
eagles0513875ya andv was killing himself yesterday trying to manually fix the mistakes11:49
andveagles0513875, yeah, fixing a wrong revid11:50
andvcrashed my head11:50
eagles0513875hehe11:50
eagles0513875and filing those bugs crashed mine11:50
gnomefreaki never even filed it there11:51
gnomefreakupdated firegpg to not done since latest moving files crap upstream did11:53
gnomefreakhas no working clean call11:53
andvgnomefreak, feel free to add me as co-maint for packages we gonna push in Debian11:53
andvgnomefreak, so I can help sponsoring11:53
gnomefreakandv: extensions im not sure what we push to debian since they are updated upstream so often but if mine went to debian i most likely would package it same time as ours. as for packages not sure who pushes sunbird if we do at all to debian11:55
andvgnomefreak, asac told me quite all extension should go to debian and get synced over here11:56
gnomefreakit would be great to package extensions for debian sincce very little will need to change. no renaming of files ect..11:56
gnomefreaki was hoping for other way around11:56
gnomefreakthey sync from us for once11:56
andvit will never happen11:57
gnomefreaki know we have extensions from them and its a mess with the ice* names and they dont update them for us11:57
andvour extension need to be updated with debian-related fields11:58
andvand so on11:58
andvand syncs doesnt exist in debian anyway11:58
gnomefreaki guess with mine i can update them here and debian to latest security release11:59
andvgnomefreak, is firegpg ready for debian?11:59
gnomefreakandv: hell no. upstream moved FireGPGCall and now clean in rules fails i commented it out (bad idea) now it builds. dont want to push until i get clean working12:00
andvgnomefreak, clean is pretty use to fix12:01
andv*usually*12:01
* gnomefreak likes having clean there. but either way need to figure that out12:01
gnomefreakandv: one of these days i will change control info and fix rules once i figure out how to do it with FireGPGCall bull12:02
andvok12:02
andvgnomefreak, have you ever worked on ubuntu-it-menu?12:02
gnomefreakandv: nope12:03
gnomefreakandv: who was working on that yesterday?12:03
andvmmm...don't know12:03
eagles0513875hehe i was filing a bug against it but not working on it12:03
gnomefreakcant recall if it was you or eagles0513875(bug stuff)12:03
gnomefreakeagles0513875: can you give me bug #12:03
eagles0513875blarg hold on12:03
eagles0513875time to clear out the cache for ie lol give me a sec12:04
gnomefreakandv: i guess i should wait to see what the bug is before asking what needs to be done :)12:04
asacandv: gnomefreak: uploaded to debian/unstable12:04
asacandv: gnomefreak: please test your stuff before asking to upload12:04
eagles0513875morning asac12:04
gnomefreakasac: thanks (flashgot?)12:04
asacdepends had syntax error12:04
asacyes12:04
asaci fixed it on the mozilla-extensions-dev12:04
gnomefreakasac: the sync was no space in email12:05
gnomefreaki might have used an older one for test since i didnt get it into PPA until yesterday12:05
andvasac, syntax error where?12:05
asaccheck the commit log12:06
gnomefreaki can honestly say sunbird works with new fixes since i use it daily12:06
gnomefreakhmmm12:07
eagles0513875gnomefreak: the ubuntu-it-menu bug is 42578412:07
gnomefreakeagles0513875: thanks12:07
eagles0513875asac: how are we marking stuff as done on the wiki once it has been pushed12:07
gnomefreakok i was thinking changelog but it was in control now i am looking12:08
gnomefreakor not12:08
eagles0513875asac: what was the link to the wiki again so i may make my corrections to it12:09
andvasac, have to talk with you via pm later12:09
ikoniagnomefreak: what's your current sunbird build ?12:09
gnomefreakbe back in a few12:10
andvasac, that typo not my fault xD12:10
gnomefreakikonia: ubuntu3 IIRC12:10
gnomefreakopps12:10
ikoniata12:10
andvgnomefreak, you did some typos in the control file12:10
andvwhile removing stuff12:10
andvxD12:10
gnomefreakandv: i was LP was working so i can see them12:10
gnomefreakoh just a ,?12:10
asaceagles0513875: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview12:10
andvgnomefreak, yes12:11
asacyes a ,12:11
gnomefreakthat gave errors on sync?12:11
asacanycase ... both of you worked on the branch and signed if off without testing12:11
asac;)12:11
asacgnomefreak: that caused build failure12:11
gnomefreakandv: was testing it12:11
eagles0513875thanks asac btw not sure how much im gonna be able to help out but im willing to go to the next step in what ya want to teach me bout btw i can help with packaging if need be12:11
asacgnomefreak: you should be testing too ;)12:11
andvasac, I tested it before12:11
gnomefreakasac: not here it didnt12:11
eagles0513875but right now bug fixing or anything and im just an emotional mess due to a death in the family12:11
andvasac, that's why i told you removing that thing in rules made it not working12:11
asacandv: you are not a bot12:12
gnomefreakasac: i know i was too caught up in time crunch yesterday but still my bad12:12
asac;)12:12
andvasac, i was going to get crazy yesterday with the merge thing sorry12:12
asacsure12:12
asacits ok12:12
gnomefreakbug 42578412:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 425784 in ubuntu-it-menu "firefox-ubuntu-it-menu uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42578412:12
andvI went to my gf house and I had a bad headache12:12
gnomefreakthats it?12:12
andvtoo many brain using12:12
andvxD12:12
asachehe12:13
eagles0513875gnomefreak: ya thats it12:13
asacall fine its uploaded12:13
andvyep12:13
asaclets hope ftp-masters let it throuhg12:13
andvasac, np, gonna ping my friend12:13
gnomefreakeagles0513875: ok will have it for testing in PPA shortly. i will test it here too but not sure how well it will work12:13
eagles0513875andv: the packaging links that the bots provides the first one do i use that one to setup the necessary items for packaging12:14
andvasac, off for lunch, I'll pm you later12:14
andveagles0513875, bbl12:14
eagles0513875ok andv12:14
gnomefreaki would love a branch on it if someone knows of one12:14
eagles0513875wow i made a mess of that wiki lol12:15
gnomefreakeagles0513875: you do know that the rul3es file is about as basic as you can get :)12:24
gnomefreakonly 5 lines of commands12:24
asacgnomefreak: can you close the flashgot sponsoring bug?12:26
asacsaying its uploaded to debian now?12:27
gnomefreakasac: yes12:27
gnomefreakasac: one minute12:27
asacgnomefreak: forwarded you debian NEW mail12:27
gnomefreakasac: ah ok thanks12:28
gnomefreakill be back not sure how this happened12:30
andvasac, forward that to me as well please12:37
asacbdrung: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30320749/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.prism_1.0b2%2Bsvn20090813r49078-0ubuntu1~umd2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ... seems prism is broken ;)12:37
asacandv: done12:37
andvasac, ty12:38
asacbdrung: so seems to be a mozillla-devscript regression ;)12:38
asacwrt legacy support12:38
andvasac, it didnt appear on NEW yet, and it's not into incoming12:38
andvasac, something went wrong?12:38
asacno12:38
asaci think website is just batched updated12:38
asacandv: forwarded you mail12:38
andvk12:38
asacthats all i know12:38
bdrungasac: but what happened there?12:39
asacno clue ... let me check what rules look like12:39
asacdh_installdirs -pprism12:39
asac[ -d temp-xpi-unpacked ] || mkdir -p temp-xpi-unpacked12:39
asacunzip -d temp-xpi-unpacked .o12:39
asacunzip:  cannot find or open .o, .o.zip or .o.ZIP.12:39
asacthats the error12:39
asacso wrong zhip file detected12:39
bdrung.o?12:40
asacerr12:40
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/prism/prism12:40
asaci have no idea how to get to the code with the new edge interface12:40
asacsigh12:40
asacwhat a mess12:40
bdrungMOZ_XPI_FILE is defined12:43
asacbug 42414712:43
ubottuLaunchpad bug 424147 in launchpad "when looking at a branch in launchpad, the link to view the source code is no longer apparent." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42414712:43
* asac still fights looking at source code12:44
asacok got to it through revision12:44
bdrungthat's the way i took12:45
asacrefractor.xpi:: build/prism12:46
asaci think that rule isnt run12:46
asachmm12:46
gnomefreakok i am unable to understand italian belive it or not. but it is done and tested :)12:46
asaci think i dropped the implicit invocation of the MOZ_XPI_FILE rule12:46
asacbecause we dont know that file except for the cases where its explicitly set12:47
gnomefreakmaybe i should update it for 3.5 while im at it12:48
asacbdrung: ^^12:49
asacso i assume we should not use refractor.xpi, but rather common-post-build//prism or something ;)12:49
asaclet me check12:49
gnomefreakeagles0513875: we should add, add support for firefox-3.5 in the extensions that are not already12:51
gnomefreakok ubuntu-it-menu is done and debdiff attached to bug 425784 i am using it here so i know it works :)13:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 425784 in ubuntu-it-menu "firefox-ubuntu-it-menu uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42578413:13
andvgnomefreak, let me look at it13:13
gnomefreakhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-it-menu13:14
gnomefreakandv: debdiff on bug report13:14
andvk13:14
gnomefreakits still building in PPA but i installed it from local buid13:14
gnomefreaks/buid/build13:14
andvgnomefreak, 0ubuntu2~jjv13:15
andvgnomefreak, why?13:15
gnomefreakshit let me fix that13:15
andvasac, yeah, it appeared on NEW13:16
andvasac, as soon as he gets on, it will be accepted13:16
gnomefreaki dont think we will push to debian with name like ubuntu-it-menu so we should keep ubuntu part on it IMHO but the jjv part was for push to PPA i have changed it but LP is giving me problems today13:19
andvgnomefreak, the status should be set to 'fix committed' for flashgot13:19
andvgnomefreak, not fix released13:19
andvgnomefreak, the package is not yet in ubuntu13:20
gnomefreakandv: asac trold me to close it13:20
TomaszDhi, is the problem of Firefox 3.5 translations being worked on? a clean install of alpha-5 still has broken translations of FF13:20
gnomefreaktold even13:20
andvgnomefreak, usually you add a fix commited when the package will be in debian soon13:20
andvgnomefreak, plus I don't know if we can get an FFe for it13:20
andvgnomefreak, so maybe it will join ubuntu in karmic+113:21
andvwho knows13:21
gnomefreakok i will change it to commited but first LP needs to start working13:21
andvgnomefreak, k13:21
andvgnomefreak, if you're unable to fix that cause LP13:22
andvtell me and i will do it on my own13:22
gnomefreakthat sucks i was waiting to go any further with versions until it hit repos13:22
andvgnomefreak, latest flashgot13:22
andvis a bug fix only release?13:22
andvor it adds new features?13:22
gnomefreaklast i heard 1.2 was latest13:22
andvyeah 1.213:23
andvit adds new features?13:23
gnomefreak1.2 didnt IIRC13:23
andvbug fixes only?13:23
gnomefreaki would have to look but kind of busy atm :)13:23
gnomefreakandv: i think so i will look when i get a moment13:23
andvgonna check the changelog13:23
andvnow13:23
gnomefreakandv:13:24
andvwe are on 1.2.0.413:24
andvnow13:24
gnomefreakit seems to die only on revsion numbers13:24
andv?13:24
gnomefreakandv: than i will update it when i get time :)13:25
gnomefreakLP branch revisions13:25
andvgnomefreak, don't need to rush13:25
andvlet's wait some more13:25
gnomefreakSorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server.13:25
andvhere too13:25
andvbazaar.lp.net don't work13:25
gnomefreakandv: the branch should be updated so if you can get it let me know13:25
gnomefreaki just asked if it was server issue in #launchpad13:25
gnomefreakbut nothing yet. going for smoke13:25
andvubuntu-it-menu?13:25
andvbranch?13:26
gnomefreakandv: done13:26
andvk13:26
andvgnomefreak, looks fine13:26
andvgnomefreak, if you fixed the versioning13:26
gnomefreakhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-it-menu13:26
gnomefreaki did and i pushed but i would have liked to check it to make sure13:26
gnomefreakbrb smoke/coffee let me know if something is wrong13:27
andvk13:27
andvgnomefreak, looks fine, why did you added the browsers as well?13:31
gnomefreakandv: as for flashgot i would like to email upstream and see if he will remove those file for a linux version before updating it13:31
andvgnomefreak, ok13:31
gnomefreakandv: incase people dont have the package "firefox' installed13:32
andvgnomefreak, asac told us to remove those depends13:32
gnomefreakyou can install "firefox-3.5" without installing "firefox"13:32
andvor am I wrong?13:32
gnomefreakandv: 2.0 deps last i heard13:32
gnomefreakthis is for people that upgrade without "firefox" installed13:33
andvah k13:33
andvgnomefreak, firefox | abrowser | firefox-3.0 | firefox-3.5 | abrowser-3.513:33
andvI would like to see it written different13:33
gnomefreakandv: like what?13:33
andve.g firefox | firefox-3.0 | firefox-3.5 | abrowser | abrowser-3.513:33
gnomefreakandv: ok minor change :) ill fix it now while i have term open to it13:34
andvit's the same but adding related-deps all together is nicer to see13:34
andvbut it's the same for you13:34
andv* me13:34
andvasac, when you have a minute to check ubuntu-it-menu debdiff, tell me so I can sponsor it13:35
andvasac, looks fine to me13:35
gnomefreaki have to make a new one since im changing control?13:35
andv?13:35
andvasac, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-it-menu/revision/1613:35
andvgnomefreak, what new one?13:35
gnomefreakandv: leave the control deps alone or fix them for new debdiff13:35
andvgnomefreak, add a new debdiff with the versioning fix13:36
gnomefreakok13:36
andvplus deps organized a bit better13:36
gnomefreakandv: how so?13:36
gnomefreakandv: copmmand debdiff does that all for me13:36
andvyeah13:36
andvjust provide a debdiff with that fixed13:37
gnomefreakk13:37
|eagles0513875|gnomefreak: you might wanna talk to asac about adding which browser version the extension supports to the wiki13:37
asaclaunchpad times out13:38
gnomefreakasac: i asked in #lp already no answer13:39
andvasac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31490184/ubuntu-it-menu.debdiff13:40
gnomefreakpushing new changes. will do debdiff in a few13:40
eagles0513875sry bout that guys13:40
andvasac, versioning is wrong, but gnomefreak fixed that already13:40
asacuse 0.15~ please13:41
asacdepends should be xpi:Depends13:41
gnomefreakok13:41
asacoh13:41
asacrecommends is right13:41
gnomefreakxpi:* is how it should be13:41
asacbut remove all the depends13:41
gnomefreakremove the deps?13:41
asactake over changelog ownership13:42
asacyes13:42
asacdch -r13:42
asacto take over13:42
asaci dont think luca prepared the new upstream release13:42
andvasac, I've already talked with him13:42
gnomefreakasac: someone did that was from dev branch13:42
andvasac, he's italian like me13:43
asacdoesnt matter. if gnomefreak does new upstream relesae changelog must be taken over ;)13:43
asaci know13:43
gnomefreakasac: not sure where upstream release is13:43
asacgnomefreak: previous was UNRELEASED13:43
asacyou did new upstream release13:43
asachmm13:43
asacgnomefreak: ok13:43
andvasac, it's not a new upstream release13:43
asacso dont take it over13:43
gnomefreakasac: ubuntu-it-menu (1.0.7.0-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low13:43
gnomefreaki didnt do new upstream luca did13:43
asacall ok13:44
andv1.0.7.0-0ubuntu1 previous13:44
asacjsut address what i said13:44
andv1.0.7.0-0ubuntu2 now13:44
gnomefreakhis was karmic mine is unreleased13:44
gnomefreakdoing13:44
* gnomefreak still not sure why remove depends13:45
gnomefreakor was that due to xpi*13:46
asacgnomefreak: because you moved them to recommends13:46
gnomefreakoh the xpi:* does that13:46
gnomefreakok lets try lp again13:54
eagles05138752nd person confused about that lol13:55
* gnomefreak trying to figure out the importance of the ~13:57
gnomefreakbut either way its fixed13:58
fta2asac, once again, ff 3.7 refuses to start (x64)13:58
gnomefreakasac: andv http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31491173/ubuntu-it-menu.debdiff13:58
* gnomefreak wonders what all the crap is in debdiff13:59
asacfta2: with xerror?14:00
gnomefreakits outside of my revision14:00
asacfta2: does it flush lots off stuff on the console ?14:00
fta2asac, no, no crash, no error, in gdb, it shows it exits with err 014:00
gnomefreakandv: new revsion info http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-it-menu/revision/1614:01
fta2i mean 0114:01
asacfta2: you sure no firefox process running?14:01
fta2yep14:01
asacgnomefreak: that crap has to go away14:01
asacyou committed that accidentially it feels14:01
gnomefreakasac: ok is there an easy way to run debdiff to exclude it or should i do it by hand14:01
gnomefreaki did? i didnt touch that file14:02
gnomefreakcontrol and changelog is it14:02
gnomefreakmaybe because we droped all deps?14:03
asacgnomefreak: you are supposed to commit stuff14:03
gnomefreakthat shouldnt matter14:03
asacnot send debdiffs14:03
gnomefreaki did commit it to branch14:03
asacgnomefreak: definitly not14:03
asacbzr log -p14:03
asaclook at the output14:03
asaci am sure you committed it14:03
asacor its in bzr diff14:03
asacfta2: i will update now to latest and see14:04
fta2asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/267257/14:04
fta2it's not new, started a few weeks ago14:04
asacfta2: above you said there is no output14:05
asacthere is all that X stuff14:05
asacthats what i ment14:05
asaclooks like it find a firefox window14:05
asacin X14:05
gnomefreakasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/267259/ its not from my commit14:05
asacfta2: paste output of xwininfo  -root -children14:06
gnomefreakoh but wait wtf14:06
fta2asac, i have those XRemoteClient with 3.6 too, and it works fine on this box14:07
asacyes14:07
gnomefreakwhy does it say i did new upstream release but not in my changelog nor anywhere else14:07
asacdoest matter14:07
asacpaste please ;)14:07
fta2asac, if i upgrade 3.7 to the lastest daily, it will work, then tomorrow, if i restart (3.7), it will refuse to start14:07
gnomefreakoh ok hold on a sec let me see if i cant fix this14:08
asacyes14:08
asacwhile in such a situation please paste the command14:08
gnomefreakwhy am i commiting new version if i didnt do a new version :(14:19
gnomefreaks/am i/is it14:19
gnomefreaki think i know a why to do this :)14:20
TomaszDasac, hi, is the problem of Firefox 3.5 translations being worked on? a clean install of alpha-5 still has broken translations of FF14:21
TomaszDdpm told me you were working on this14:21
gnomefreaki just started a new branch fixed changelog and control and i still get all that cruft14:22
gnomefreaksays i changed license and other upstream crap14:23
gnomefreakand its not in my commit so im not sure what it is14:24
gnomefreakdoesnt show up in my branch either14:24
gnomefreakim lost14:24
gnomefreaki even tried using just bzr commit debian/control debian/changelog14:31
fta2asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/267278/14:31
asacfta2: thats not the command i gave you14:32
asac:)14:32
asac15:06 < asac> fta2: paste output of xwininfo  -root -children14:32
fta2oh, i didn't read, i thought it was not for me14:33
asacit has fta2: ;)14:33
fta2what do you need from that command?14:33
asacfta2: grep -i firefox14:34
asacjust pastebinit ;)14:34
fta2nada14:34
fta2fta@cube:~ $ xwininfo -root -children | grep -i firefox14:34
fta2fta@cube:~ $14:34
gnomefreakasac: not sure where that crap is comming from i have tried everything i can think of including new branch. its just on the debdiff not on my branch14:34
fta2i have a bunch of "(has no name)"14:34
gnomefreak- added ${xpi:Depends} to recommends14:34
gnomefreak  - removed all depends because ${xpi:Depends} does this for us14:34
gnomefreakis most likey the cause14:34
fta2ohoh14:35
fta2scim-bridge14:35
asaclet me check the bandaid patch14:35
asacif it has a upper number of retries or something14:35
fta2http://paste.ubuntu.com/267283/14:35
gnomefreakfixing branch atm14:37
asacgasp found a bad bug in gtkmozembed.h header14:37
gnomefreakasac: andv https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-it-menu  << use this screw debdiffs14:39
asaclooks good gnomefreak14:41
asacandv: ^^14:41
gnomefreakthanks. not sure why debdiff is collecting prevuios changes14:42
asacbug 38532514:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 385325 in thunderbird "[armel] thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGVI" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38532514:42
gnomefreakthats what i was going to do :)14:42
gnomefreakthat was fixed already i thought14:42
gnomefreakit will close mine when you push sunbird ubuntu3214:43
fta2asac, i killed scim-bridge (no idea why it uses my ff profile) but it doesn't help14:43
gnomefreakubuntu314:43
gnomefreakasac: from Lp it says upi pushed yours maybe it didnt close on its own14:43
gnomefreakah jaunty build hasnt been done14:44
gnomefreakupdates -> email -> done i think14:47
andvasac, back14:55
andvgnomefreak, debdiff updated?14:56
asacandv: branch updated not debdiff14:57
andvasac, I would prefer a debdiff to see if the latest changes apply on the previous uploaded package in the archive14:57
andvasac, plus the bug report should have a debdiff for later review as well14:58
gnomefreakandv: no forget the debdiffs15:00
andvgnomefreak, please add it15:00
andv:)15:00
gnomefreakandv: debdiffs are not turning out right no matter what i do15:00
andvasac, I would add a note in the changelog entry15:00
gnomefreakeven started with clean branch and redid everything15:00
andvasac, saying 'extensions transition'15:00
gnomefreakit seems to be adding upstream changes from luca15:00
andvgnomefreak, how is that possible?15:01
gnomefreakalso forgot to put bug # in changelog15:01
gnomefreakandv: dont ask me look at last debdiff15:01
asac__andv: its good enough to have a merge request15:01
andvgnomefreak, apt-get source ubuntu-it-menu, do the changes, debuild and debdiff15:01
asac__no need for a debdiff15:01
asac__if its all bzr branch there is no need to15:01
gnomefreakandv: did15:01
asac__with a release commit you can easily figurew out the diff from bzr15:01
andvasac__: gnomefreak told me the branch adds some upstream changes15:01
asac__but you are the sponsor15:01
asac__so you can ask the things you want15:01
asac__andv: the branch i just looked at doesnt15:02
gnomefreakandv: it shoudnt my branch is fine with just my changes15:02
asac__andv: his debdiff had some upstream changes15:02
andvasac__: I gonna debuild the bzr revision and debdiff it with previous upload15:02
asac__but thats most likely because he messed it up locally15:02
gnomefreakdebdiff isnt hard to run :)15:02
asac__i alreawdy signed off the branch ... so just look at the branch and if you dont see anything, testbuild and upload15:02
andvasac__: as a suggestion I would add as a topic in the changelog15:02
andvasac__: a topic like 'extensions transition'15:03
andvwe are doing all these on quite all extensions so maybe to identify this transition15:03
andvin all of them would be nice to have such a topic15:03
andvso that next uploaders will know what we did and why15:03
andvasac__, what do you think?15:04
gnomefreakif we do let me know if you do it or i do it. i would like to add fixes lpbug# so it closes bug for me15:05
andvgnomefreak, gonna add it15:10
gnomefreakandv: thanks15:10
andvnp15:11
andvgnomefreak, how can we call the transition in the changelog?15:13
andvgnomefreak, extensions transition to latest mozilla-devscripts?15:13
gnomefreakandv: not real sure. can you explain in more detail on what it is for?15:13
andvgnomefreak, to let know ppl what we are doing15:14
gnomefreakandv: no need for transition for that, since it was just a bug fix15:14
gnomefreakandv: doesnt the changelog tell them that?15:14
andvyeah, but doesnt explain why we are changing all them15:14
andvthe package itself works without this specific changess15:14
asac__andv: we have a wiki page that should be referred to:15:14
asac__https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview15:14
andvthat's great15:14
asac__so say like:15:15
andvgonna update your changelog gnomefreak15:15
asac__ * karmic extension review/update15:15
andvk15:15
asac__   - see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview15:15
andvk15:15
asac__also fill it in the table when doing15:15
asac__so we know which were checked/processed15:15
* gnomefreak confused now. new version of devscripts is not really needed to be explained more?15:15
asac__the table is busted though15:15
gnomefreaklooking at it15:15
asac__eagles0513875: you didnt fix the table yet ;)15:16
=== asac__ is now known as asac
gnomefreakor not15:17
gnomefreaki sort of fixed it15:18
asacok fixed the page15:18
asacplease fill in as you do the extensions15:18
asacgnomefreak: for it-menu he opened abug: 42578415:18
asacplease close that in changelog15:18
asacbug 42578415:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 425784 in ubuntu-it-menu "firefox-ubuntu-it-menu uses wrong version of mozilla-devscripts" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42578415:19
andvasac, im doing it15:19
andvnp15:19
asacgnomefreak: andv: you can go through his bugs and start fixing them or review more extensions15:19
gnomefreakasac: andv said he would add it. i told him i forgot up some lines15:19
asacactually we talked about him doing his bugs once he did it15:19
asacso maybe start with extensios not yet listed there15:19
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions15:19
andvasac, dinstall just runned so he will process flashgot soon ;)15:19
asacall ~ubuntu-dev need to be reviewed15:19
asacthx15:20
asachave to do something else now15:20
gnomefreakok who was working on wiki when i was15:20
gnomefreakok confused now15:22
eagles0513875asac: i lost my grandmother today btw thats why i havent fixed it yet15:23
andvgnomefreak, 2 things15:23
gnomefreakandv: what ones?15:24
andvgnomefreak, first: W: firefox-ubuntu-it-menu: extra-license-file usr/share/firefox-ubuntu-it-menu/LICENSE this can be fixed using a feature from mozilla-devscripts o.1515:24
andvsecond: some changes in upstream files (dunno what you did in the branch) http://paste.debian.net/46054/15:24
gnomefreakandv: the debdiff said i change license file but i never tuoched it15:24
gnomefreaktouched even15:24
gnomefreakandv: heance the whole problem with the debdiff15:25
andvtitleMenu.xul is not license file15:25
andvgnomefreak, your branch differs from the orig file15:25
gnomefreakandv: that is only one of the files listed in debdiff15:25
andvgnomefreak, nope, the only one I got15:26
gnomefreaknot sure why its from ubuntu-dev branch15:26
gnomefreakother wise i can start with revsion 1 from our package in repos15:26
andvgnomefreak, that would be great15:26
andvgnomefreak, you get latest package, you push it15:27
andvyou do your changes15:27
andvand then I take care of the remaining actions15:27
gnomefreakok i will fix it than. but just knwo it will only have 1 revision15:27
* andv tests it in the meantime15:27
gnomefreakim guessing devs need to fix thier branch15:28
andvubuntu-it-menu is really nice15:31
andvnever installed it before15:31
gnomefreakwhy does the page have so many blocks? they all seem the same since no title has been given to each one15:31
gnomefreakandv: it is and i think one for english would be great15:31
andvyeah15:31
andvit has been made by the italian community15:32
andvgnomefreak, those changes made in the upstream tree15:32
andvgnomefreak, are a free space only15:32
andv^^15:32
* gnomefreak not sure what changes would be needed to build it for other lang.15:32
gnomefreakandv: dont get it15:33
andvgnomefreak, all links refers to ubuntu-it15:33
andvso they should be changed as well15:33
gnomefreakandv: in the debdiff?15:33
andvyes15:33
gnomefreakandv: i never touched them so the changes should not be needed15:33
andvyeah, they appear on the debdiff15:34
gnomefreakif luca screwed up thats different15:34
gnomefreakandv: my branch shows none of them that is what is bothering me15:34
andvgnomefreak, maybe luca imported some changes in the upstream tree15:34
andvlet me see his diff.gz file15:34
gnomefreakasac: any reason we have 3 blocks of the same thing without titles on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview#preview i would say drop the last 215:35
gnomefreakandv: ok15:35
andvgnomefreak, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/28212733/ubuntu-it-menu_1.0.7.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz15:35
andvgnomefreak, his diff is clean15:35
gnomefreakandv: did you try a debdiff?15:35
andvgnomefreak, that's the diff file15:36
andvgnomefreak, so every change to the upstream tree is reported there15:36
gnomefreaki used https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-it-menu.ubuntu15:36
andvgnomefreak, but as you can see it's clean15:36
gnomefreakthat branch should be good since it is a dev branch. the changes i made should not affect the debdiff in that way15:36
gnomefreakandv: it is15:36
gnomefreakandv: as a test make your changes from dev branch and try a debdiff see what you get15:37
andvk15:37
gnomefreakandv: not sure what revision on lucas that caused this15:37
gnomefreakbut changeing control + changelog should have no effect on the debdiff in that way15:38
gnomefreakyep its his changes that are in my debdiff15:39
gnomefreaknow a why would be handy15:39
andvgnomefreak, debdiffing dev branch15:39
andvgnomefreak, with your latest commit15:39
andvcleans everything15:39
andvno upstream tree files are modified15:40
gnomefreakoh damn i used the .dsc from package15:40
gnomefreakthat explains why one was good and one wasnt15:40
andvxD15:40
* gnomefreak still not too worried about a debdiff :)15:40
gnomefreak!info flashplugin-nonfree15:41
ubottuflashplugin-nonfree (source: flashplugin-nonfree): Adobe Flash Player plugin installer (transitional package). In component multiverse, is optional. Version 10.0.32.18ubuntu1 (karmic), package size 1 kB, installed size 40 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia)15:41
gnomefreak!info flashplugin-nonfree jaunty15:41
ubottuflashplugin-nonfree (source: flashplugin-nonfree): Adobe Flash Player plugin installer (transitional package). In component multiverse, is optional. Version 10.0.32.18ubuntu0.9.04.1 (jaunty), package size 1 kB, installed size 40 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia)15:41
andvgnomefreak, will you fix it or not?15:43
gnomefreakandv: the debdiff?15:43
andvgnomefreak, either the debdiff or the branch15:44
andvgnomefreak, I usually don't wanna see tainted diff.gz15:44
gnomefreakwhats wrong with my branch?15:44
ikoniado you need to ask ;)15:44
gnomefreakyes since my branch is fine from what asac said :)15:44
asacgnomefreak: you messed the conflict up15:44
asacif fixed it a while ago15:45
asaci mean like 20 minutes ago15:45
andvgnomefreak, http://paste.debian.net/46059/15:45
gnomefreakconflict?15:45
asacnow someone submitted it with conflicts again15:45
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/ubufox_0.7-0ubuntu1.dsc15:45
asachttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview15:45
asaclook at that page15:45
asacplease roll back to the version i wrote15:45
andvasac, the diff.gz is tainted by some upstream tree changes15:46
gnomefreakok confused now. what does the wiki have to do with extension15:46
asacandv: that means that the revid: is wrong15:46
andvasac, I usually love having a clean diff.gz but if this ok for you, ok15:46
andvasac, http://paste.debian.net/46059/15:46
asacgnomefreak: if you dont nkow whats going on, then why do you edit that page?15:46
gnomefreakasac: and if wiki you mean no i cant turn them back i dont think15:46
gnomefreakasac: you changed it while i was15:47
andvasac, those changes are really useless but tains the diff, so your choice15:47
gnomefreakasac: i was fixing the table15:47
asacgnomefreak: i said that i already did that15:47
asacgnomefreak: you should have seen the conflict when saving15:47
asacit tells you "wait its broken" ... dont just hit save15:47
asacstart with revision 9 again15:48
gnomefreakasac: i didnt see either15:48
asacthen you just didnt look ;)15:48
asachttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview?action=info15:48
asaclook at the asac page15:48
asacthats the version we want to start with15:48
asacgnomefreak: click on it and then at "more actions" you can say "revert to this revision"15:48
asacrevision 9 on that page15:49
gnomefreakim looking atm15:49
asacclick on view15:49
asacand then you can "revert to this revision"15:49
andvasac, want me to skip this changes in diff.gz file: http://paste.debian.net/46059/15:50
andvasac, looks like the -dev branch had that change but the package into the archive didnt15:52
gnomefreakasac: neither let me change revision still looking. revert to revsion only uses 10 wont let me change to 915:52
gnomefreakfound it15:53
andvgnomefreak, I gonna fix that by hand15:53
gnomefreakhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview15:53
gnomefreakandv: ok so you dont need me to fix it?15:54
gnomefreakor what do you need me to do before i start email15:54
andvgnomefreak, gonna fix it on my own, np15:56
fta2asac, any idea for my 3.7 problem? otherwise, i will upgrade and it will work for a short while15:56
andvgnomefreak, how does it look like now: http://paste.debian.net/46062/15:59
gnomefreakoh yeah lots of crap from that but it still runs15:59
andv:)15:59
andvgnomefreak, a fresh and clean debdiff16:00
gnomefreakfta2: i get errors in erm but 3.7 opens and runs16:00
gnomefreakandv: much better thanks16:00
andvgnomefreak, a LICENSE.txt file is installed somewhere16:00
gnomefreakyou used the package or the branch16:00
andvwant me to fix that?16:00
andvgnomefreak, the package16:01
andvgnomefreak, gonna remove the extra license file16:01
gnomefreakandv: is it in top level dir?16:01
andvgnomefreak, I'll do it16:01
andvgnomefreak, assign me to the bug, I'm off16:01
andvI'll do it this late evening / night16:01
gnomefreakandv: ok i didnt see an extra license file but ok assigning you16:01
gnomefreakandv: night16:01
andvgnomefreak, no no, not going to sleep, wanted to say will do it late evening or night16:02
andvxD16:02
andvit's 17:02 here16:02
andvafternoob16:02
andv* afternoon16:02
gnomefreakyeah that too16:02
andvbbl16:02
gnomefreaksorry its morning here16:02
gnomefreakfta2: bug 401055 is what you are seeing i think16:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 401055 in xorg-server "[MASTER] Gdk-ERROR **: The program 'firefox-3.5' received an X Window System error (BadWindow)" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40105516:06
gnomefreaki commented that 3.7 is seeing this16:07
fta2gnomefreak, no, it's not BadWindow here, nor any X error16:12
gnomefreakfta2: oh i get them in 3.716:16
gnomefreakXRemoteClient Error - [XRemoteClient::CheckWindow] Get X Window Error = 016:16
gnomefreakXRemoteClient Error - [XRemoteClient::FindBestWindow - XGetWindowProperty 1] Get X Window Error = 016:16
gnomefreakthats my output16:16
gnomefreakover and over again16:16
fta2yep, but it's not fatal like the infamous X Window System error (BadWindow)16:17
gnomefreakfta2: nope i guess not. but why are you seeing it and not me?16:17
gnomefreak3.7~a1~hg20090907r32284+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd116:17
fta2who knows, i'm only seeing this in my amd64 box, not on my other 32bit boxes16:21
* gnomefreak 32bit here maybe that is the difference16:28
eagles051387564bit vm here16:29
ftaasac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31502638/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.firefox-3.7_3.7~a1~hg20090908r32306%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz19:17
andvasac, flashfot accepted19:23
andv* flashgot19:23
andvthere was a problem with the Thumbs.db file but everything is ok now19:24
andvasac, could you please add another column in the wiki page regarding which extensions should go to Debian and which ones should stay in Ubuntu19:26
andvasac, so I know which one to work on with debian-related fields and so on19:27
asacandv: feel free to do that19:27
andvasac, yes, but I don't know which ones you want to go to debian19:29
andvand which not19:29
micahgasac: do you have anything to do with epiphany-browser or should I go talk to #ubuntu-desktop?19:30
andvasac, don't know which valutation method you want me to use19:31
andv* valuation19:31
asacandv: you can add that column. on things not ubuntu specific the answer usually is debian19:32
asacunless there is a debian package19:32
andvasac, k19:32
andvasac, BTS> flashgot (NEW) 1.2+dfsg-1 uploaded by John Vivirito <gnomefreak@ubuntu.com> http://packages.qa.debian.org/flashgot19:33
asacmicahg: i am one of the folks taking care for epiphany when we have time left19:33
micahgasac: It's EOL upstream19:33
micahg-gecko19:33
asacgreat19:33
micahgso I was wondering if it should be removed from Karmic19:34
micahgand -browser repointed to -webkit19:34
micahgbug 41474819:34
andvasac, when I get back home later I gonna push ubuntu-it-menu ;)19:34
andvasac, need to fix the extra license file19:34
ubottuLaunchpad bug 414748 in epiphany-browser "epiphany-gecko is EOL upstream" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41474819:34
andvasac, chatzilla is a nice ext, gonna do it as next19:36
andvasac, but I guess it's already in: http://packages.debian.org/sid/iceape-chatzilla19:37
ftamicahg, about dailies of seamonkey, i really don't think it's worth it, not enough users, not to mention we already need more people committed to fix the build issues19:39
micahgfta: is there a reason we don't have a seamonkey daily build19:39
ftaseamonkey                         8292   0.68%         1       8       0    828319:40
ftaseamonkey-2.0                       81   0.01%         0       0       0      8119:40
andvasac, maybe not, looks like chatzilla is included into iceape19:40
ftachromium-browser                 11796   0.97%       898    4914    5982       219:40
asaci agree with fta. we cannot add more dailies without folks fixing them19:40
asacdepending on the amount of patches of course19:40
asacandv: dont be too motivated about uploading everything to debian19:40
micahgwould I be able to help with that?19:40
asaci want to start slowly on that19:41
andvasac, k19:41
asacfor now only new extensions i consider19:41
asacwe can mark them as "should go to debian"19:41
asacbut i will not start doing mass uploads there ;)19:41
ftamicahg, sure19:41
micahghow can I help fix build issues?19:41
asacwhoever wnates to help has to subscribe to build failures ... wait19:41
ftamost of the failures are just patch failing to apply because the context changed19:41
asacmicahg: can you subscribe to the ppa?19:42
asacmaybe it gives you build failures too?19:42
micahgno19:42
micahgno option to subscribe to ppa19:42
asacmicahg: so for now fta can include me and you in the build failures he pings us with ;)19:43
* micahg will try to build seamonkey in my ppa19:43
micahgok, what do I do to fix a build failure?19:43
asacmicahg: usually a patch doesnt aply anymore and needs to be rebased19:43
micahgpull source branch and fix the patch?19:43
asacyes19:43
asacthen suggest a merge.19:43
asacbut tell fta you want to work on that19:43
asacotherwise he might be quicker ;)19:43
micahgis there a guide on rebasing patches?19:43
asacand that would duplicate effort19:43
micahgok19:44
micahgwell19:44
asacmicahg: no ... its quilt push -f19:44
asacthen working through the .ref files it creates19:44
asacand applying that manually if its still needed19:44
micahgI'd only be available in the evenings for it19:44
asacwhen done you run quilt refresh19:44
micahgusually when you two are sleeping :)19:44
asacwe usually dont sleep early ;)19:44
asacmicahg: when is evening?19:44
micahg0200-0600 UTC19:44
micahgBTW, I backported the latest bzr-rebase to jaunty if anyone needs it19:46
ftayou just need to get the tarball from the ppa (the one that failed), pull the packaging branch, bzr bd --merge it, go to the build dir, move to the source dir (often build-aread/something), ln -s ../../debian/patches, quilt push -f, have a look at the .rej (reject) files, try to apply those rejects manually, quilt refresh, quilt push -a (to see if the rest of the patch stack is ok), then move the refreshed patch back to the branch, commit, push b19:50
ftaack to your area of lp, request a review19:50
fta(oops; long line)19:50
micahgok19:51
micahggot it19:51
ftaalso before starting anything, first look at the build log to see if you understand the error. if you do, proceed, if you don't or are unsure, just ask us19:53
ftayou can try with <fta> asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31502638/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.firefox-3.7_3.7~a1~hg20090908r32306%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz19:54
asacmicahg: already bumped the snapshot for this in the branch19:55
micahgactually my ff3.7.head branch is out of date and I wanted to practice rebasing on it19:55
asacso you just need to grab the orig.tar.gz and then can try to build19:55
asacand fix patch19:55
micahgok19:56
micahglet me try19:56
micahgdo I pull the daily head branch?19:58
ftamicahg, oh, and before you ask for a review, you should build the package. once you feel confident, it may not be mandatory, depending on how trivial the fix is19:58
asacmicahg: no just the .head branch19:59
asacmicahg: we only bump the changelog revision if there is a change upstream that requires adjustment ... like it was the case now, because the patch failed19:59
asacmicahg: so what i did was commit a new snapshot revision and now wanted to adjust patch20:00
asacsince i didnt do it yet, you can just adjjust patch based on the latest .head20:00
ftai have a trick, i use the bot to create the bump revision for me ;)20:02
ftathat's why my commits look all the same ;)20:03
micahgis firefox/3.7 the head branch now?20:04
ftayes20:05
andvasac, flash lib files where are stored?20:09
micahgI don't see ref files20:11
micahgit says files are missing20:13
micahgI'm checking the tarball for the files20:14
asacmicahg: --merge20:15
asacbzr bd --merge20:15
asacotherwise files are missing ;)20:15
micahgdid that already20:17
andvasac, flash lib files where are installed?20:17
asacno clue20:18
andvoki20:18
asacno clue what that question means.20:19
micahgugh20:25
micahgthis isn't working20:25
micahgI'll have to get some help another time20:25
micahgneed to work now20:25
ftamicahg, .rej, not .ref20:30
ftalike reject20:30
micahgnone of those either20:31
micahgquilt refresh20:31
micahgNothing in patch firefox-profilename20:31
ftaand you probably need a ~/.quiltrc to have the same style as we have20:31
micahgah20:31
micahgok20:31
micahgwhat should be in mine?20:31
ftamicahg, please pastebin what you've done20:32
asacyou need to use QUILT_PATCHES20:32
micahgfta: just quilt push -f and quilt refresh20:32
micahgasac: how?20:32
* micahg never used quilt before20:33
asacfta: can you give him your .quiltrc? i dont use any, but use ln -s ... ;)20:33
ftamicahg, you need to start the build, so it unpacks the embedded tarballs for you20:33
asac./debian/rules patch ;)20:33
asacworks nowadays20:33
micahgi did that manually20:34
asacpaste all the steps you did so far ... like fta asked20:34
ftaasac, i don't use any in my pbuiler nowadays, but i used to have one in my chroots: http://paste.ubuntu.com/267495/ some projects use -U3, we use -U820:35
micahgit's a mess right now...bd merge (had debian and .bz2), decompressed bz2, quilt push -f, quilt refresh20:36
ftasometimes, sorting is useful, etc..20:36
ftayou should never need to decompressed bz2 manually, let the package do that for you20:36
micahgI wanted to look at the files20:36
micahgbut it seems like I just needed to have the .rc file instead20:37
asacmicahg: bzr bd --merge -e -> that extracts the package for you20:37
asacmicahg: then ./debian/rules patch20:37
asacto apply patches20:37
asacthen you can use quilt20:37
micahgah20:37
asacif you have QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches20:37
micahgI missed that second step :)20:38
asacotherwise you need to use ln -s debian/patches20:38
asacso you have a patches dir on top level dir20:38
asacmicahg: actually its in build-tree/mozilla for the tar.bz2 layouts20:38
asaci would suggest to use QUILT_PATCHES env20:38
asacmicahg: in your .quiltrc ... like fta posted:20:38
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/267495/20:39
micahgok20:39
asacuse that project20:39
asacerr file ;)20:39
micahgI added that20:39
asacmicahg: you usually run quilt refresh, etc. if oyu are in build-tree/mozilla/20:39
asacso quilt push -f to apply the broken patch20:39
asacwork in the .rej files20:40
asaccheck that all is good with20:40
asacquilt diff20:40
asacand run quilt refresh to apply it20:40
asacthen run quilt push -a20:40
asacto check that all the other patches stilla pply20:40
asacand quilt pop -a20:40
asacto see that you didnt forget to refresh something20:40
asacthen you can run debuild -b ;) to kick off the build20:40
asacwhen done remember to copy the new patches/* files to the packaging branch20:41
asacotherwise everything will be lost on next bzr bd ;20:41
asac)20:41
micahgok20:41
ftaasac, http://codereview.chromium.org/20201220:59
asacouch21:00
asacsigh. they shouldnt hack around this21:01
asacrather plugins that are unhappy should die21:01
asacit causes pain here too21:01
ftathey target hardy21:01
ftaare you ready to kill the totem plugin?21:02
jcastrofta: \o/ finally a response!21:08
jcastrofta: once they have like a stable branch and all that, do you have a list of problems that keeps chromium out of the archive?21:09
jcastrolike a general big list21:09
ftajcastro, mostly copyright review, a system libs21:10
fta-a+and21:10
ftathat and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Chromium/Packaging21:10
jcastrodo you think you can get chromium running on the system webkit?21:11
ftanope21:12
jcastroheh that's what I thought21:12
ftait may be possible to do the other way around, ie change our system wekbit to be the chromium one21:13
micahg1ugh21:13
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
micahgstill not working21:13
ftamicahg, pastebin what you did so we can help you21:14
micahghttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/267518/21:15
micahgI ran ./debian/rules patch before that21:15
ftawhat do you have in that dir?21:17
ftayou should have build-area/mozilla21:17
micahghttp://pastebin.com/fde1112621:18
ftai mean build-tree/mozilla21:18
ftaso either you set QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches in your env, or you go to build-tree/mozilla and ln -s ../../debian/patches21:19
ftathen from build-tree/mozilla, quilt push -a, it will apply some patches and fail on the culprit, like in the logs21:19
micahgi set the env var21:20
micahgdo I need anytthing elsE?21:20
ftathen quilt push -f, it will apply the patch, and leave at least one .rej, maybe more21:20
BUGabundohey21:20
BUGabundohowding fta micahg asac, everyone21:20
micahgquilt push -a21:20
micahgThe topmost patch firefox-profilename needs to be refreshed first.21:20
ftaprobably because you tried other ways before, drop all .pc/21:21
fta./.pc21:21
ftayou should use the link instead, QUILT_PATCHES is a mess when using embedded tarballs and relative paths21:22
asacyes21:23
asaci hate QUILT_PATCHES21:23
asacand found out that it doesnt work for embedded tarballs just now21:23
asaci think we should create the link post patches target everywhere21:23
asacits a contribution mess somehow21:23
ftait does, but you have to be carefull to always start for the package origin21:24
asacBUGabundo: all good. just busted with some urgent backchannel stuff ;)21:24
fta-for+from21:24
asacso not much chatting for me here today21:24
BUGabundono prob21:24
BUGabundoI won't be here much either21:24
BUGabundojust saying hi21:24
* BUGabundo goes checking for daily updates21:24
micahghow do I link?21:24
fta"go to build-tree/mozilla and ln -s ../../debian/patches"21:26
ftabut unset QUILT_PATCHES21:26
micahgno go21:29
micahgI can't do this anymore right now21:30
micahgsorry21:30
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
BUGabundoasac: I got a new bug for you21:32
BUGabundo3G modem won't be seen if plugged during boot21:32
BUGabundono prob it re-plug after login21:32
ftaasac, what do you think we should do for the chromium system libs? at some point, i had zlib, bzip2, sqlite3, libjpeg, libpng, libxml and libxslt ready, but since, i had to drop zlib and sqlite321:40
ftathere's v8 & skia, which i don't think we should do right now21:41
asacfta: zlib is a desaster. given our recent firefox experience, i think i have spent enough tears no that issue21:42
asacjust keep sqlite internal21:42
asacdone21:42
asacdo what you want to do with zlib21:42
asacwe could try to fix the package21:42
asacbut who knows what they will do next21:42
BUGabundoasac: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^21:43
fta2 issues with zlib, minizip headers not shipped, and bug 40217821:43
ubottuLaunchpad bug 402178 in libpciaccess "gzopen64 implicitly converted to pointer" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40217821:43
asacfta: the minizip objects are not even in the lib afaik21:44
asacfta: drop it21:44
asacif some ftpmaster thinks its worse to make zlib we can do that ;)21:45
mconnorasac: why is general.useragent.locale a complex pref?21:45
asacmconnor: otherwise it does not work with .xpi translations21:46
ftaasac, no, we ship a binary (minizip) in zlib-bin, but not the headers21:46
mconnorit... doesn't?21:46
asacmconnor: yes. it will be en-US forever21:46
mconnorbecause xpis can't override default prefs?21:46
mconnoris there a core bug on this?21:47
mconnorand when did you start doing this?21:47
* BUGabundo feels ignored by asac :\21:47
asacmconnor: everytime we raise "matchOS" issues we got unsupportive comments21:47
mconnorasac: from who?21:48
mconnorand how does matchOS fit in here?21:48
asacmconnor: distros have to use matchOS otherwise packaging translations is not possible.21:48
asacmconnor: and the general.useragent.locale is not changed on the fly by matchOS afaict21:49
asacor its changed too late or something.21:49
mconnorbut why does it need to be a complex pref, instead of a charpref?21:49
mconnor(sorry if these questions seem dumb, it's been a while since I've looked at the prefs system)21:50
asacmconnor: i have to look that up again.21:50
asacmconnor: we have it for ages and last time i tried it was about 1h ago21:50
asacmconnor: i think (completely wrong it might be) that it has something to do with either that defaults/preferences dont work21:50
asacor (what i think is more likely) it was a startup order thing.21:51
asaclike the pref got set too late or something21:51
mconnorbeing set dynamically, you mean?21:51
asac1h == 1y21:51
mconnorhmm21:51
asacif its set at all21:52
asaci am not so sure about that atm21:52
asacmconnor: i looked at it now that i touched the code for this21:53
asacmconnor: and there are not so many places where general.locale is referenced21:53
asacso we could fix all locations.21:53
mconnorexcept any extension code using/setting this would be busted21:53
asacor we could say: "yes, we want to fix it this matchOS thing" for real21:53
asacmconnor: yes.21:53
asacthats bad.21:53
asacmconnor: maybe we can make complexpref smarter ?21:54
mconnorwhy is it a complex pref though?21:54
asacso it can be transparently used for getCharPrefs21:54
mconnoroh, localized prefs are complex prefs?21:54
asacyes21:54
asacsorry21:54
asacthought you know ;)21:54
mconnorit's been 2-3 years since I did anything with localized prefs21:55
asacyes. thats why i said "sorry"21:56
mconnorno worries21:56
mconnorso, hmm21:56
asacwe can do two things: a) investigate what we can do in the long run to get rid of the complex pref in our build21:57
mconnorthere really should be a bug about this, since I can see all sorts of awesome issues here21:57
asacb) fix the places that cause problem within mozilla and check if complexprefs can be made charprefs more transparently21:58
asacmconnor: one issue we had (and why i tried to back that part out in the first place 1y ago) is the blocklist url. that was mozilla bug 46976022:00
ubottuMozilla bug 469760 in Add-ons Manager "blocklist url %LOCALE% replaced with general.useragent.locale value, but without resolving complex value on ubuntu" [Major,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46976022:00
asacdont worry: it definitly gives us good results. i was just concerned about the metrics on your side22:00
mconnorasac: hmm, so, blocklist really shouldn't use the pref anyway, afaict22:18
asacmconnor: havent verified if its fixed in 3.7 ... its definitly used, check the patch i proposed: https://bug469760.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=35313622:20
mconnorasac: we could just return nsIChromeRegistry.getSelectedLocale("global"); like the URL formater uses22:21
asac"its declared hacky" so dont mind the not needed code for the char pref in there ;)22:21
asacsounds good22:21
asaci will try that and suggest that as a patch (if its not already done)22:21
mconnorI assume that works fine, since I assume the addon manager etc works22:21
mconnorit's not22:21
asacgood22:21
mconnorwell, not good ;)22:22
mconnorideally, we should fix the blocklist service to use the nsIURLFormatter interface22:22
asacgood that we have a solution for that now ;)22:22
mconnorinstead of recreating the wheel22:22
asacyes thats what was commented on that bug22:22
mconnor"now"22:22
asaci just would love to have nice blocklist urls. if we can fix matchOS+ general.useragent.locale in a different (more dynamic) way. then i would be even more happier22:23
mconnorI would bet that method's been around since 2005 or earlier22:23
asacyeah22:23
mconnorwell22:23
mconnorhere's the question: does getSelectedLocale work with your langpacks, i.e. does it return correct locale info?22:23
asacmconnor: as of now?22:24
mconnoryes22:24
mconnorI think it should22:24
asaclet me check22:24
mconnorI am 99.9% sure it will, but please verify :)22:24
asacwhats the contract url of chrome registry ;)? let me look22:24
asacerr component ;)22:24
mconnorhttp://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/690a453b8768/toolkit/components/urlformatter/src/nsURLFormatter.js#l6822:25
asacgreat22:25
mconnoryou know what to do with the Cc/Ci stuff, I assume22:25
asacbetter even22:25
asacsure22:25
asacthanks for the confidence ;)22:25
asacif copy/paste would be preserved across mozilla stops22:27
asacthat would have been even better ;)22:27
asacyes it works here22:27
asacmconnor: ^^22:28
mconnorok22:29
mconnorhmm22:29
mconnorit looks like g.a.l used to be a complex pref22:29
mconnorin 200422:29
asacright22:29
mconnoror thereabouts22:29
asaci think it was removed because firefox didnt support multiple locales anymore22:29
asaccompared to mozilla suite22:30
mconnorI don't think that's true22:30
asachehe22:30
mconnorsince we have switcher UI that shows up in addons mgr when multiple are installed, aiui22:30
asacswitcher UI was added when?22:30
asacisnt that an extension?22:30
mconnorthere's an extension for primary UI22:31
mconnorbut I thought there was something in addong mgr22:31
asaclet me kick off the japanese build i have here and check with some xpi22:31
asacmconnor: i dont see anything22:34
asacmaybe not so great idea to start with a mozilla ja build ;)22:34
mconnorwell, yeah22:34
asacbut i only see the "disable" + "uninstall" buttons22:34
asacand there is "refresh" at the bottom afaict22:34
mconnorfor the languages tab?22:34
mconnorhttp://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/content/extensions.js#214622:35
asacyes ... in addons -> langguages22:35
asacstarted with fresh profile too22:35
mconnorand you have what other language installed?22:35
asacde.xpi22:35
asacone sec22:36
asacuploading screen22:36
asachttp://people.canonical.com/~asac/jaaddons.png22:36
asacusing xpi from here: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.5.2/linux-i686/xpi/22:37
mconnorisn't that the enable button?22:38
asacmconnor: the left one was the "disable" button22:38
asacnow its greyed22:39
asacand the right one is uninstall i would think22:39
asacthe (D) means disable as it seems22:39
asacnow its (E)22:39
asac;)22:39
mconnorhmm22:39
mconnorintriguing22:39
asacnot sure i would run the japanese version if i were from japan ;)22:39
asaci would be constantly offended about all the latin stuff still in there ... so directly go for en-US ;)22:40
mconnorthat might actually be correct accesskeying22:40
asacyes22:40
asaci know22:40
asacthats the accesskeying22:40
mconnorthere's some weird stuff with how accesskeys work for some locales22:40
asacyeah. thats what i mean22:40
asacthey usually have no complete keyboard22:40
mconnoryeah22:40
asacbecause english was born to be a computer language :-P22:40
mconnoranyway, hmm22:40
Mook_sbyes, with CJK (dunno about V), since you still have a qwerty keyboard22:41
asacmore likely because they didnt want to find their own standard22:41
asacin short. firefox does not support multiple languages oob.22:42
mconnorit's a little strange22:42
mconnorI thought this UI was better22:42
asacthats why all the problems (maybe even to be called regressions) pop up for us22:42
mconnorasac: we support it... just not _well_ ;)22:42
asacas we canoot really ship a full build for each locale .. especially since we want multi-user desktops that can have differnt langeuage ;)22:42
asacmconnor: right22:42
mconnorreally, this should be like the themes tab22:42
asacmconnor: lets its not an officially used feature. so there is decay ;)22:43
mconnor"Use Locale"22:43
asaci think the old mozilla suite thing was too much UI clutter for firefox approach22:43
asacand then when addons manager became more powerful it was forgotten22:44
asacto add ;)22:44
mconnorhey, at least we have some UI for it!22:45
mconnordo you have a link to an xpi?22:46
asacyes. you can look at them, and be happy that you have them ;)22:46
mconnorso I can see this in English22:46
asacand hope you might be able to use them at some point without and extension ;)22:46
asacsure22:46
asachttp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.5.2/linux-i686/xpi/de.xpi22:46
asacthats german22:46
asacour builds dont offer it too22:47
* mconnor switches to a 3.5.2 build22:47
asacbut i wanted to test with official mozillla build and only had ja22:47
asacare there langpacks for 3.6 yet?22:47
mconnorunlikely22:48
mconnordunno the state of localization, but we wouldn't have built anything until beta22:48
asacyeah22:49
asacthats important for me. do you really think that december is realisitic for a 3.6?22:49
mconnorI do22:52
mconnorbased on running current builds at least22:52
mconnorso, hmm22:52
mconnorit's a complex pref so we can get the value of intl.properties22:52
mconnors/of/from/22:52
mconnorasac: anyway, I know it's late, but I think the right fix is probably going to be using the selectedLocale, not general.useragent.locale22:54
mconnorI'll have to check with bsmedberg22:54
asacmconnor: are we on the blocklist bug?22:54
asacor on the original one?22:55
asac(distribution/searchplugins)22:55
mconnorboth22:55
mconnor:)22:55
asacok22:55
mconnorreally searchplugins22:55
mconnorbut the right fix, in all cases like this, seems to be "use the current locale from chromereg"22:56
asacyes22:56
mconnorbut the use in netwerk is tricky, might need to special-case that (fall back to the pref for the non-libxul embedding case, if we actually care about that case anymore)22:58
mconnorasac: are you still using jwsdot for bmo bugmail?22:59
asacyou mean in netwerk/protocol/http/src/nsHttpHandler.cpp?22:59
asacmconnor: unfortunately yes.23:00
mconnoryou can fix that whenever you want, y'know23:00
mconnor;)23:00
asacwell. i have to resort my bugmail filtering23:00
asacits a complete mess23:00
asaci also have a @canonical.com thing23:02
asacbut only for formal change bugs23:02
mconnorah, yes, bugmail filtering sucks without good server side capabilities for the extra headers23:04
asacwell. even then. sometimes i think its all lost ;)23:04
asaccurrent state is that i only get to the mails that get in my inbox23:04
asacand in consequence i have to pipe more to my inbox23:05
asacand so on23:05
asac;)23:05
mconnorew23:05
asacmaybe i should start using thunderbird again ;)23:05
asaclet me check what chrome registry does23:07
asacdoes it look at the pref ;)?23:07
asacok seems to check the system stuff if matchOS23:09
asacotherwise uses selecte locale prefs23:09

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!