/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/09/11/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
LLStarksasac. what's the best way to find when and how a change landed in the 1.9.2 branch?01:22
ftahg blame your/file01:23
ftaor http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla1.9.2/01:23
micahgfta: what do I need to look for in the .rej file?01:24
ftamicahg, it's the part of the original patch that was rejected and that you need to re-add, or drop if it's no longer needed01:25
micahgwell, I'm looking at the file and I can't see what's wrong01:25
ftaoften, it's just that the context of the patch changed, so just re-add the changes manually, and quilt refresh afterwards01:26
micahgfta: would whitespace mess up a patch?01:28
ftayes, everything different will01:28
LLStarksfta, this is so frustrating. i know that a trough-border issue was resolved between firefox 3.5.4 and 3.6a101:28
LLStarksbut i can't drill it down any further01:28
micahgLLStarks: those releases are not contiguous01:29
LLStarksi know01:29
LLStarksbut between those branchings01:29
LLStarkswould it be mozilla-central or mozilla-1.9.2?01:30
micahg3.6a1 would be mozilla-1.9.201:32
micahgmozilla-central is 3.701:32
LLStarkswell, if the fixed behavior is present in both, where did it originate?01:32
micahgin both what/01:33
LLStarksthe bug is fixed in both01:34
LLStarksyet i can't find the commit that fixed the bug01:35
micahgwell01:39
micahgit depends when it was fixed01:39
micahgif it was after the branch, it landed in 3.7 first01:39
micahgbefore they were the same01:39
micahgin mxr.mozilla.org, you can search for files and then see who committed what revision01:39
LLStarksit's fixed in 3.6a101:41
LLStarksi'm not sure how much earlier though01:41
micahgLLStarks: maybe search bugzilla for the bug and see the changeset01:44
LLStarksmy bug is the only relevant one01:45
micahgwhy are you looking for it?01:45
LLStarksto have the fix backported for karmic01:45
LLStarksthe art team wants it01:46
micahgdo you have the bug number for bugzilla?01:46
LLStarkshttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50036801:46
ubottuMozilla bug 500368 in Widget: Gtk "non-zero GtkRange::trough-border value produces strange boxes in Firefox/Xulrunner" [Normal,Unconfirmed]01:46
asacthats definitly not the bug01:46
asacthat was fixed upstream ;)01:47
LLStarksi know01:47
LLStarksi'm looking for the commit01:47
asaci am sure you wont find it that easily ;)01:47
asacthere are probably 2k commits or something ;)01:47
LLStarkswhat's with the wink01:47
asacyou need to find the bug :)01:47
LLStarksyou did it, didn't you?01:47
asaci did it?01:47
LLStarksi know the bug was elevated01:48
micahgasac: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/revision/45901:48
LLStarksbut i lack the technical knowhof to find it01:48
asaci remember that we did something ... yes.01:48
* micahg finally go tit01:48
asacbut i have no clue ;)01:48
micahgoops :)01:48
micahggot it01:48
micahgthat's the nsGnome patch01:49
LLStarkswait, is that it?01:49
micahgLLStarks: something else for the umd builds01:49
asachttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=trough&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resolution=FIXED&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=DUPLICATE&resolution=WORKSFORME&resolution=INCOMPLETE&resolution=EXPIRED&resolution=MOVED&resol01:49
asacthats a search for trough with all closed bugs ;)01:49
asacbut i dont see it in there ;)01:50
micahgasac: should I propose a merge?01:50
LLStarkscould someone have fixed it without even knowing it?01:50
micahgLLStarks: sure01:51
LLStarksbtw asac, the bug i filed was previously and erroneous marked as worksforme by brosnan01:51
asacmicahg: is the patch done?01:52
asacand working? ;)01:52
micahgasac: the first part01:53
micahgI fixed the gnome fix, now on to the missing dir01:53
LLStarksmicahg, if it was a blind, blanket fix done as part of the evolution of the gtk widget in firefox, would it even be documented in a mailing list or public sphere?01:54
asacLLStarks: you know ... all is in hg01:54
asacand bugzilla01:54
asacthts all01:54
asaccheck the commits to01:54
micahgLLStarks: without a bug or a changeset, you have no idea if it was a side benefit of another patch or explicitely01:54
asac/widget/src/gtk2/gtk2drawing.c01:54
micahgfixed01:54
asac/widget/src/gtk2/nsNativeThemeGTK.cpp01:55
asacwith some luck those files have not been touched so often ;)01:55
LLStarksi know, i've been looking at changes over the past year01:55
LLStarksi don't know enough c to parse the files01:55
micahgasac: does mxr deal with missing files?01:55
asacsummary:     Bug 501104. Handle GTK2 default button borders properly. r+sr=roc01:56
ubottuError: Launchpad bug 501104 could not be found01:57
asacLLStarks: ^^01:57
asacLLStarks: i dont look at code01:57
asacjust at the changes01:57
asacmozilla bug Bug 50110401:57
ubottuError: Launchpad bug 501104 could not be found01:57
asacmozilla Bug 50110401:57
ubottuMozilla bug 501104 in Widget: Gtk "Our handling of default button borders doesn't match GTK" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50110401:57
LLStarksbingo01:57
LLStarksdoes the canonical agreement with mozilla allow small backports?01:58
LLStarksfrom future releases?01:58
asacno01:58
asacwe need to get it landed upstream01:58
asacif its too risky for them its too risky for us ;)01:59
asacwhich is quite a sensible line ;)01:59
asacLLStarks: but thats just button borders01:59
asaci dont think thats your bug01:59
LLStarksi know01:59
LLStarkstrough-borders01:59
LLStarksscrollbars and the like01:59
LLStarksbrb02:01
micahgasac, I think I found the bug for the other one upstream02:04
micahgasac: mozilla bug 511642 is breaking 3.602:13
ubottuMozilla bug 511642 in Build Config "use a single packaging manifest across all three platforms (with preprocessing)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51164202:13
micahgand 3.702:13
asacyeah02:15
asacso they unified the list02:15
asacso we need to adjust our patch to patch the new file02:15
asacbrowser/installer/package-manifest.in02:15
micahgyep02:15
micahgworking on it now02:16
asacdid you manage to get first patch done?02:16
asacwant to show me?02:16
micahgyep02:16
asacjust the patch i mean ;)02:16
asacand maybe an interdiff02:16
micahghttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7.head02:16
asacof the previous to the new patch02:16
asacmicahg: please use topic names ;)02:16
micahg??02:16
asacyou now took the same branch name as our branch02:16
asacthis means you cannot keep it after we merged it02:17
asacwell you can keep it02:17
micahgok02:17
asacbut you cannot reuse the same name02:17
asacuse topic name02:17
micahgwell02:17
asactopic names02:17
asaclike firefox-3.7.head.daily-patch-rebase-DATE02:17
micahgwhat should I have used for this ff3.7.head.umd2009091002:17
asacor something else innovative02:17
asacyes for instance02:17
micahgok02:17
micahgwell02:17
micahgI can push up a new branch02:17
asacyou can rename the branch even in launchpad ;)02:17
asacdoesnt matter. just wanted to explain the problem with not using topic branches ;)02:18
micahgok02:18
micahgdone02:18
asacso launchpad code is completely broken02:18
asacnew url please ;)02:18
asaci cannot look at the diff anymore now ;)02:18
asacah ok02:19
asacno02:19
asac;)02:19
asacfound it02:19
asacyou used my name ;)02:19
micahghmm02:19
asacok so that patch was just rebased ... no changes needed?02:20
asacupdate debian/patches/lp185622_system_path_default_browser.patc02:20
asacforgot the "h" at the end02:20
asacbut no need to fix that ;)02:20
micahgI only removed lines02:20
micahgyes02:20
asacok02:21
asacpush the new one ;)02:21
micahgworking on it...02:21
asack02:21
micahgI refreshed the first patch02:21
micahgthe second one is giving me issues02:21
micahglet me try again02:21
asacUpdate lp185622_system_path_default_browser.patch to remove libgnomevfs (Mozilla Bug 294375)02:21
asaci usually just say:02:21
ubottuMozilla bug 294375 in File Handling "libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Deprecated function. User modifications to the MIME database are no longer supported." [Minor,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29437502:21
asac* adjust patches to new upstream code base02:21
asac  - update patch102:21
asac  - update patch202:21
asacand do those in one commit unless some patch needs more love02:22
micahgok02:22
asacbut the new patch needs more love02:22
micahgI thoguht you said to do one fix per patch02:22
asacbecause they refactored stuff02:22
asacmicahg: for me "* adjust/rebase patches to new upstream code base" is one fix ;)02:22
micahgok02:22
micahgwell02:22
asacbecause all together fix the build02:22
asac;)02:22
asacif there is a bug or a more complicated rebase02:23
micahgI can fix and then repush02:23
asacno its ok02:23
asacwell02:23
asacmaybe use the adjust syntax ;)02:23
asacno need to do all in one patch02:23
asacbut i dont mind if its not in changelog as long as its clear that this adjusts/rebases a patch02:24
micahgasac: I'm still learning the lingo02:24
asacsure. your comment reads too "complicated" ;)02:25
micahgI thought it was removing gnomevfs from the patch, but it was really rebasing since we didn't make any changes with gnomevfs02:25
asaci would think ... oh it was serious work needed ;)02:25
asaceven though it just shuffles bits02:25
asacyes02:25
asacthats what i men02:25
asacmean02:25
asaca comment like: "* adjust/rebase patches" ... implies: business as usual02:25
asaceverything else would make me wonder: what was this in a year or so ;)02:26
asacits your private branch so you can just uncommit and push --overwrite02:26
asacafter doing it two or three times02:27
asacyou will know the procedure ;)02:27
micahgis it not helpful to mention which upstream patches caused the rebase?02:27
asacits not really rocket science. just a few "best" practices we do with our branches that make live easier to collaborate02:27
asacmicahg: usually not.02:28
asacits at the committers discretion02:28
asacfor rebasing usually not02:28
asacbut for dropping its nice to say which bug made this obsolete02:28
asacor if the patch was not a rebase, but needed to be redone differently02:28
micahgok02:29
micahgI got through it02:29
asacso for this "manifest unification" cause02:29
micahgworking on file 3 of the installer cleanup02:29
asacit might be reasonable to say that02:29
asacits not a plain adjust02:29
asacbut "rework patch after upstream landing of bug ..."02:29
asacor something02:29
asacmaybe also give a word or two how you reworked it if its noteworthy02:29
asaclike "rework patches after upstream landing of bug ...; we move the bits and pieces from the platform specific installer manifest to the new common location and do this and that ..."02:30
asac;)02:30
asacbut dont make an art out of it ;)02:30
micahgah, I'm done :)02:34
micahgok, so now I make another commit02:35
asacyeah02:35
micahgor just uncommit and fix everything in the comment :)02:35
micahguncom,mit?02:35
asaci would split it in two commits:02:35
micahgok02:36
asaca) simple patch rebase/addjustment02:36
asacb) patch changes because of manifest changes02:36
asacbut thats just my opinion02:36
micahgok02:36
micahgwill do02:36
asacif you are sure that your manifest adjustment was good you can also just sell it as a "rebase"02:36
* micahg thinks is good, but it was 3 patches and 1 code change02:36
asacwhat do you mean?02:37
asacmy suggestion is02:37
micahgI had to change bin to @BINPATH@02:37
asacah02:37
micahgin one file02:37
micahgto match the new style02:37
asacok02:37
asacwell. just commit as you think02:37
micahgso 2 commits or one?02:38
asaci will see if that makes sense to me ;)02:38
asaci wouldnt commit a patch change that involved real changes in a normal "adjust all patches to new codebase" commit02:38
asacbut thats me ;02:39
asac)02:39
asacbut if in doubt. splitting is always good ;)02:39
asacalso gives you more commits and more bzr karma in launchpad ;)02:39
asacoh no ;) ... just found out that i trashed my gnome-bluetooth upload i prepared in /tmp/ with last reboot02:42
* asac shouldnt reboot02:42
micahgok, I just pushed it up02:42
micahgI noted the mozilla bug for the manifest change02:43
asaclaunchpad is slow in updating ... takes a minute i gues02:43
micahgdone02:44
asacyeah. so the commit message is still not formatted like we do ;)02:45
micahgbrb02:45
micahgugh02:45
micahgsorry02:46
asachttp://bazaar.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7.head.daily-patch-rebase-20090910/changes02:46
asaclook at that02:46
micahgforgot the *02:46
micahgshould I fix?02:46
asacalso you dont need the "updated patches:" line02:46
asacbecause we say:02:46
asac - update path/to/file02:46
asac - remove path/to/file02:47
asac - add path/to/file02:47
micahgok02:47
micahgI'll try again :)02:47
asacin the meantime i look at the changes02:48
asacalso i usually say: "... after upstream landing of BUG or TOPIC" ;)02:48
asacor TOPIC (bmo: BUG)02:48
asacbut if the formatting is ok i am fine ;)02:49
asac+bin/chrome/awesome-branding.jar02:50
asacthats wrong i think02:50
asacyou need to use templates everywhere in our patch02:50
asac@BINPATH@02:50
asacsame for the browser_branding patch02:50
micahgoops02:51
asacyou can edit the patches directly ;)02:51
asacof course its safer to push and refresh02:51
asacmaybe do that to excersize a bit more ;)02:51
asacediting patches directly can still be done later ;)02:51
asac#ifdef XP_UNIX02:53
asacis the #endif there somewhere?02:53
asaccould be that we dont see it in this patch ;)02:53
micahgyes02:53
asacok02:53
micahgis it ok that I put it there and not under the ifndef XP_MACOSX?02:54
asacour patch is not really arch specific02:54
asaci would think02:55
asacso could be moved even outside that block02:55
asacbut doesnt relly matter much here02:55
* micahg will try a test build02:55
asaccool02:56
asacthats important02:56
asacmaybe the branding is completely busted now and firefox doesnt work ;)02:56
asacbut i hope its ok02:56
asacthe changes look good to me ;)02:56
micahgyay!02:56
asacat least from the technical side02:56
micahgBTW, 3.6 only needs the manifest changes02:56
asacif it doesnt work we have to check whats going on now02:57
micahgI fixed the binpath, now I have to push it up again02:57
asacfix the commit syntax while you are at it ;)02:57
micahgI did02:58
asacgood02:58
micahgBTW, the main problem I had was I didn't know where to fix the .rej file :)02:58
asacdid you figure that out?02:59
micahgyep, with some help from hyperair02:59
asacthe quiltrc fta gave you had some "use unified rejects" option02:59
asacyou might want to try that at some point02:59
asacthe normal .rej format is odd02:59
asacbut i got used to it02:59
asacgreat03:00
asacthat you dound your way ;)03:00
asacmicahg: you forgot a whitespace ;)03:00
asacindentation03:00
asacof comment :)03:00
micahgyeah, I had to fix it in the file and then use your funny diffstat ccommand03:00
asacyou should really look at bzr log | less03:00
micahgwhere?03:00
asachmm03:01
asacmaybe its the firefox font ;)03:01
asacits ok ;)03:01
micahgthat's the browser03:01
asacyeah03:01
asacso please test a build03:01
asacand let me know if it works03:01
asacis xulrunner also coming?03:02
asacdidnt even know it failed ;)03:02
asacno xul is fine as it seems03:02
asacok03:02
micahgI made an alias for quilt refresh --diffstat03:03
asacyes. you can also use quiltrc for that ;)03:03
asaci think everything is ok but the QUILT_PATCHES thing03:03
asacthats bogus as it seems for the embedded tarball thing here03:03
asacfta: so firefox-3.7 is still in dep wait state. probably got the 1.9.3~umd as the lower bound today ;)?03:04
micahgasac: well, it wouldn't bui,ld anywyas03:05
asacsure03:05
asacthats for sure i mean ;)03:06
asaci386 has 14k jobs on 15 ppa builders03:06
asacouch03:06
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/builders03:06
micahgasac: builds started right away for me03:18
micahgasac: it built fine :)03:32
micahgasac: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20090910 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Minefield/3.7a1pre03:34
asacdoes it work?03:37
micahgyep03:37
asactry to install abrowser stuff please03:38
asacmicahg: did you install all packages? e.g. also the -branding etc.?03:38
micahgyeah, I had the ff3.7 branding03:38
micahgit showed minefield03:38
micahgnow trying abrowser branding03:38
micahghmm03:39
micahgxml error on abrowser03:39
jcastroasac: yikes, it's like 5 days of back ups for PPAs03:39
asacmicahg: check if downgrading to latest fixes it at all03:40
asacotherwise its not a bug in your change ;)03:40
micahgstill a problem03:42
micahgbut someone else opened a bug for that issue03:42
micahgin 3.503:42
micahgmaybe it's only abrowser related?03:43
asaccould be. there is a problem in 3.5?03:43
micahgdo you have the menu whited out in 3.7?03:44
asachmm so abrowser command starts firefox 3.0 with official branding ;)03:45
micahgon jaunty03:45
micahgor karmic?03:45
asacxml error in about help?03:45
asacerr help -> about03:45
asacthats what i see03:45
asacseems we miss a logoCopyright entity in our branding pieces03:46
asachmm03:46
micahgwell, if you don't have the abrowser-branding installed03:46
asacthose branding pieces get lumped together during tarball creation iirc03:46
asacmicahg: what do you mean?03:46
asaci installed abrowser-3.5-branding03:47
asacthats how i installed abrowser ;)03:47
micahgon jaunyt or karmic?03:47
asackarmic03:47
asacand abrowser-3.5 depends on abrowser-3.5-branding03:47
micahgyeha, that shouldn't show 3.0 anything03:47
asacthats just the abrowser command03:48
asacthe abrowser-3.5 command works03:48
asaconly thing broken is about help03:48
asacwhich afaik is what the 3.5 bug is about03:48
micahgasac: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=karmic&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=abrowser03:48
micahgthat's why03:48
asacsure03:48
micahgshould I open a bug?03:49
asacthats not a big problem ... we just need a bug for that ;)03:49
asacyes.03:49
asac"ship unversioned abrowser commandin firefox-3.5 ... or something alike03:49
micahgand we already have one for the other03:49
micahgbug 39615603:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 396156 in firefox-3.5 "Help→About does not function (abrowser-3.5, jaunty-proposed)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39615603:49
asacyes03:49
asaci have to investigate that03:49
micahgasac: -beta?03:51
micahgbug 42767403:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427674 in firefox-3.5 "ship unversioned abrowser command in firefox-3.5" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42767403:51
asacthx03:52
* micahg could probably fix, but I'm already working on 3 different bugs03:53
asacso have you tried the versioned abrowser command?03:53
micahgwhere?03:53
micahgI tried abrowser-3.703:53
asack03:53
asacmicahg: 3.7 works here03:53
asacsame help -> about issue03:53
asacbut i can useit otherwise03:54
asacii  firefox-3.7            3.7~a1~hg20090907r3228 safe and easy web browser from Mozilla03:54
asacwhat type of xml error are you seeing?03:54
micahglogoCopyright03:55
asacok thats the help -> about03:55
asacso not a regression03:55
asaceveryting else works?03:55
asacgood03:55
micahgyeah03:55
micahgasac: you need anything else tonight?04:00
asacok merged your branch04:00
asacfirefox-3.6 ;)04:00
micahgright :)04:00
micahgI have to get some stuff done at work before I go home04:00
asacok. i have to sleep anyway04:00
asacgood night04:01
micahgnight04:01
micahgif I can't sleep later, I'll work on 3.6 and propose a merge04:01
micahgwas the whitespace ok?04:02
micahgasac: fta: I'm testing 3.6 daily now06:48
torrancewhi all, i had a question/potential bug report or two06:49
torrancewcan anyone here help with that?06:50
micahgsure06:50
torrancewi'm pushing jaunty, 64 bit, with shiretoko straight out of the default repository06:51
micahgok06:52
torrancewi'm pretty extension-happy, when it comes to ff, and in the past few months, i've finally discovered a few wonderful ones in the way of ubiquity, jetpack, weave06:52
* micahg is glad it's a firefox question :)06:52
* micahg forgot this was the mozilla channel :)06:52
torrancewall of which work flawlessly on my work machine (macbook pushing os x)06:52
torrancewon my jaunty box, my biggest problem is weave06:53
torrancewi am not automatically signed in, and even after signing in, it fails at "Starting Sync Server"06:53
micahghave you tried with a clean profile and just weave?06:53
torrancewno i have not06:54
torrancewgood point06:54
torrancewthis other one is almost certainly a bug, however06:54
micahgyou know how to make a clean profile?06:54
torrancewsure do06:54
micahggreat06:54
torrancewubiquity crashes my entire system if i run it while compiz is enabled06:54
torrancewmouse moves, but absolutely nothing responds06:54
torrancewCtrl-Alt-<insert keystroke of your choice here>, mouse clicks, nothing.06:55
micahgcan you enable apport06:55
micahgit totally freezes?06:55
torrancewtotally06:55
torrancewnothign short of a reboot will save it06:55
torrancewand it happens as soon as i open ubiquity06:55
micahgdo you have apport enabled?06:55
torrancewbut if i disable compiz, everything is happy06:55
torrancewi don't believe i do06:56
torrancewdon't remember, honestly06:56
torrancewcommand for apport = ?06:56
micahgsudo force_start=1 /etc/init.d/apport restart06:56
micahgthis'll enable it once06:56
micahgthen just make the crash happen06:57
micahgif that doesn't work, we can try an strace06:57
torrancewkk06:57
torrancewit'll be a few06:57
torrancewto be clear, i dont' even have tty access once this has happened....06:58
torrancewbut i may be able to ssh...06:58
torrancewnever tried06:58
micahg'k I'll be here for a while06:58
micahgdo you have don't zap enabled?06:58
torrancewi'm not familiar with it07:00
micahgjaunty disabled the x reset07:00
micahgand tty access07:00
micahgthere's a package called dontzap that restores it for jaunty07:00
torrancewi certainly don't have it07:01
torrancewbut i detest that decision07:01
micahg !info dontzap jaunty07:01
ubottudontzap (source: dontzap): Command line tool to set the DontZap option in xorg.conf. In component main, is optional. Version 0.1.2 (jaunty), package size 6 kB, installed size 124 kB07:01
torrancewthey're not features i use every day, so this may explain why they've been failing when i need them07:01
torrancewawesome07:02
torrancewi just ran into my other complaint (non-mozilla related)07:02
torrancewmy mouse randomly ceases to work07:02
micahgweird07:03
micahgare you sure the mouse is good?07:03
torrancewyeah, 64 bit has been a pain, been trying it since january07:03
torrancewjaunty made some improvements, but not all of them07:03
* micahg is running 64 bit and has been for 1.5 years07:03
torrancewyep, been using it with ubuntu for 3ish years now07:03
torrancewchanged batteries07:03
torrancewtried it in windows partition, mac machine, it's fine07:04
torrancewcertain things make it angry07:04
micahgok07:04
torrancewplaying half-life in wine, sometimes package management borks it07:04
torrancewi've heard loads of 64 bit success stories, and i know one day i'll have mine, but it is not this day07:04
torrancewwhat's the arg for profile management in ff?07:05
torrancew--profilemanager?07:05
micahgfirefox-3.5 -ProfileManager07:05
micahgtry #ubuntu-x for help with your mouse07:06
torrancewkthnx07:06
torrancewleaving for a bit - been using chatzilla for irc07:07
torrancewrestarting ff07:07
torrancewmicahg: you still around?07:15
micahgyep07:16
torrancewcool07:16
torrancewwell a fresh profile fixed weave07:16
micahggreat07:16
torrancewSomethign i should have tried already, obviously07:16
torrancewbtw, i know there's a way to run multiple ff instances with different profiles, but don't remember how07:17
torrancewany tips?07:17
micahgi don't know if that's supported at this time07:17
torrancewkk07:17
micahgwith prism you can turn a web app into a desktop app07:17
torrancewwell, i'm about to test (recreate) the ubiquity issue07:18
torrancewassuming that i lose all functionality, as per usual, what should i do to collect the necessary data, and where should i send it?07:18
torrancewheh07:19
torrancewprism has been another problem child of mine07:19
torrancewactually, i'll fire up my dreaded macbook07:19
torrancewand irc from it07:19
torrancewlet the record state that though i have all 3 flavors of os's, os x is for work only (i'm a mac consultant), and windows is to scratch the occasional brand-new video game itch07:20
torrancew:-P07:20
torrancewbrb07:21
torrancewkk07:22
torrancewshall the games begin?07:22
micahgsure07:23
torrancewalso, it saddens me that a single keystroke can cripple my system with compiz enabled07:23
torrancewalright, it's hosed07:23
torrancewnot even any mouse response07:23
torrancewhow can i leverage this situation into some useful info?07:24
micahgcan you get to a tty?07:24
torrancewnope07:24
torrancewtrying ssh07:24
micahgreboot and see if apport shows up?07:24
torrancewi am ssh'd in07:24
torrancewif that's any help07:24
micahgdid you enable apport?07:24
torrancewsure did07:25
torrancewaccording to top, X is eating all of my cpu07:25
micahgfind the process id of firefox and kill -11 it07:25
torrancewwhich is unlikely, given it's quad core 2.607:25
micahgnot if there's a memory leak07:25
torrancewkk07:26
torrancewkilled07:26
micahgis X back?07:26
torrancewnope07:27
torrancewstill no physical direct access to machine07:27
torrancewshould i try restarting gdm?07:27
micahgyou can try07:27
torrancewfail07:27
torrancewthinks it worked, but no change on screen07:28
micahgok07:29
micahgyou can try to stop gdm07:29
torrancewinit doesn't successfully do so07:29
torrancewagain, it think it does07:29
torrancewkill won't term it either07:31
micahgkill -9 the X process07:31
torrancewsuccess at last07:32
torrancewmouse is gone again, but i've got gui and keyboard back07:32
torrancewupon login, will apport alert me, assuming all went according to plan?07:33
micahgmaybe07:33
micahgif not, we can try an stace07:33
micahgstrace07:33
torrancewno apport alert07:33
micahgok07:33
torrancewtimes like these, i thank gnome-do for enhancing my keyboard-usability07:34
micahgtry launching firefox with:07:34
micahgfirefox-3.5 -f -eopen 2>&1 | tee ~/strace_ff.log07:34
micahgthat'll record a log in your home directory07:35
torrancewonce more with the error inducing?07:35
micahgyep07:35
torrancewdone07:35
torrancewkill -11 ff_pid, right?07:36
micahgit's frozen?07:37
torrancewoh yeah07:37
micahgok, just go straight for x then07:37
torrancewagain, instantly on Meta-Space07:37
torrancewstrace_ff.log contains 2 lines07:39
torrancew1 is a ptr to my foxyproxy settings dir07:39
torrancewthe other is ubiquity related07:39
micahgjust 2 lineS?07:39
torrancewdatabase table: ubiquity_suggestion_memory already exists07:40
torrancewyep07:40
micahgweird07:40
torrancewstory of my life my friend.07:40
torrancewany good advice before i succumb to the sleep gods?07:42
micahgyou can file a bug in firefox-3.507:44
torrancewi've been having the issue, even on 3.007:45
micahgwell07:45
micahgnot quite sure where the bug is07:45
torrancewi'm thinking compiz07:45
torrancewit breaks vnc, as well07:45
micahgok07:45
micahgmaybe file a bug with compiz07:46
torrancewalright07:46
torrancewthanks for the help man07:46
micahgnp07:46
torrancewto be clear, kill -9 and kill -1107:46
torrancewwhat are the flags doing there?07:46
micahg-9 is a force quite07:46
micahgquit07:46
torrancewright07:47
torrancewand 11?07:47
micahg-11 is a SIGSEGV07:47
torrancewgotcha07:48
torrancewthanks man07:48
torrancewlater07:48
micahgasac:  lp:~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.6.head.daily-patch-rebase-2009091008:02
micahgbuild is here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test08:02
eagles0513875hey guys10:04
bdrunghi10:40
andveagles0513875, there?10:51
eagles0513875morning andv and bdrung10:52
andveagles0513875, are you under kde?10:52
eagles0513875ya i am10:52
andvkarmic?10:52
eagles0513875i can never seem to get used to gnome10:52
eagles0513875ya in a vm10:52
andvplease10:52
andvopen the terminal10:52
eagles0513875hold on let me start my vm10:52
andvand give a sudo apt-get install nicotine10:52
eagles0513875O_o10:52
eagles0513875im no drug user :P10:52
andvlol10:52
andvit's a package10:53
andvdon't worry10:53
eagles0513875i know just as the brits say taking the piss10:53
andveagles0513875, then launch the application in a console10:53
eagles0513875k10:53
andvfor doing that just open up the console10:54
andvand write10:54
andvnicotine10:54
andvthat's the binary name10:54
eagles0513875k10:55
eagles0513875andv: didnt know there was a dependency called python-mutagen lol11:04
eagles0513875andv: its up11:06
eagles0513875and running from commandline11:06
andvdoes it work?11:06
eagles0513875what is it anyway a torrent app11:06
andvyeah, a p2p application11:06
andveagles0513875, do you have the package python-glade2 installed?11:06
andveagles0513875, if yes, apt-get remove it11:06
eagles0513875i have gnome desktop installed11:07
eagles0513875if i remove that package the desktop goes with it it seems11:07
andvdamn, I need to test it without that package11:08
eagles0513875if you want ill purge ubuntu desktop11:09
eagles0513875its not a problem11:09
eagles0513875let me purge it11:09
andvyeah, then re-install it11:09
andvwhen the test is done11:09
andvyou're on a vm so np11:09
eagles0513875exactly11:09
eagles0513875lol11:09
eagles0513875and im not on gnome much anyway11:09
eagles0513875i get an error11:11
andvpaste it11:12
andvon pastebin11:12
eagles0513875www.pastebin.com/m6d51ba6111:12
andvUnknown post id, it may have expired or been deleted11:13
andvrepaste it11:13
eagles0513875get rid of the www11:13
andvpaste.debian.net11:13
eagles0513875pastebin.com/m6d51ba6111:13
eagles0513875http://11:13
andvk11:13
andvworks11:13
andvso the python-glade2 dep is needed11:13
eagles0513875seems so11:13
eagles0513875let me install the python-glade2 again and see if it runs11:14
andvok11:14
eagles0513875it works with it11:16
andvmmm...11:16
andveagles0513875, open a bug against nicotine11:17
eagles0513875what would i say in the bug?11:17
andvnvm, another guy gonna do it11:19
eagles0513875andv: willing to test other things if need be11:20
andvok for now :)11:20
eagles0513875:)11:23
* gnomefreak already confused. been here for about a 1minute :(11:24
andvlol11:24
andvgnomefreak, I've cleaned up the wiki page11:24
gnomefreakbdrung: im assuming whom ever built our adblock-plus didnt start with Debians version but made it new and it was never pushed to Debian before synced11:25
asachow are things going?11:25
andvgnomefreak, firebug is unable to use mozilla-devscripts 0.1511:25
asacextensionreview doing progressing?11:25
andvgnomefreak, so leave it11:25
asacor came to an end ;)?11:25
gnomefreakandv: thanks sorry for taking mozgest but i didnt find out you wanted it until i got done with it11:25
bdrunggnomefreak: yes11:25
=== zbraniecki is now known as gandi
gnomefreakandv: works for me.11:26
* gnomefreak not sure why it wouldnt be able to. do we know "why"?11:26
gnomefreakasac: i think we are caught up on them11:26
asachttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview11:26
* gnomefreak chekcing email so maybe ill know11:26
asacthere are 7 extensions11:26
asaci think we have about 50 ;)11:27
asacin the archive11:27
asacmaybe nopt that many, but definitly far more11:27
asacthatn 7 ;)11:27
andvgnomefreak, it cleans the .xpi file11:27
andvgnomefreak, before starting the build11:27
gnomefreakasac: not sure but we can always add them. not a problem. i wont have time to do much of anything today11:27
asacok11:27
asaceagles0513875: how about reviewing a few more of those today? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions11:28
andvgnomefreak, np for mozgest, I was trying to find a debdiff / branch to review11:28
andvgnomefreak, but wasnt able to find one11:28
gnomefreakandv: maybe a slight rules adjustment?11:28
andvbrb11:28
asacmaybe fast path greasemonkey11:28
asac12:27 < seb128> asac, bug #42778911:28
asac12:27 < ubottu> Launchpad bug 427789 in firefox-3.5 ""Not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3" displayed after  installing greasemonkey from firefox" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42778911:28
eagles0513875asac: have my lpi 101 exam soon to og for11:28
gnomefreakas for chatzilla it can be bmodified when we update to 1.1.18/19 depending on if someone wants to update it. i will be gone for at least 1 week when i leave here.11:28
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427789 in firefox-3.5 ""Not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3" displayed after installing greasemonkey from firefox" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42778911:28
ubottuUbuntu bug 427789 in firefox-3.5 ""Not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3" displayed after installing greasemonkey from firefox" [Undecided,New]11:28
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427789 in firefox-3.5 ""Not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3" displayed after installing greasemonkey from firefox" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42778911:28
eagles0513875FLOOD11:28
asaceagles0513875: ok11:28
eagles0513875hehe will do some more this afternoon when i get back11:29
gnomefreakgreasemonkey works fine on 3.5.3 as well as 3.5.4~hg20090907r26344+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd211:30
asaceagles0513875: thx. every extension reviewed like this is a huge win11:30
asac;)11:30
asacwe need a complete list in a week or something11:30
eagles0513875:) i know asac11:30
gnomefreakunless i modified mine11:30
asacotherwise time left in this cycle gets low11:30
eagles0513875damn i will finish today :) hopefully11:30
asacto do much11:30
asacthanks a bunch11:31
eagles0513875no prob11:31
eagles0513875im running low on time 2 weeks till i start lectures11:31
gnomefreakasac: just bump install.rdf i would have to look at mine to tell you but it works on 3.5* and 3.6*11:31
asacandv: gnomefreak: one of you could fix greasemonkey -> update to latest upstream11:31
asacgnomefreak: it just broke for seb11:32
asache had it bumped11:32
gnomefreakInstalled: 0.8.20090123.1-0ubuntu3~jjv as <<< works for both11:32
asacyes11:32
gnomefreakok i havent triedd it this mornoing yet11:32
gnomefreakmorning11:32
asacanyway. we have to update the package in the archive11:32
asacno questions asked ;)11:32
asacgnomefreak: the 3.5.3 update killed seb11:32
gnomefreakoh it didnt kill it was working after restart. thinking browser but doesnt say11:33
gnomefreaksounds more like ubfox than greasemonnkey if browser restart fixed it11:33
gnomefreakwell i will do updates and let you know if mine broke too11:34
gnomefreakhes using upstreams by the sound of it11:34
gnomefreak* search for greasemonkey11:35
gnomefreak* install the xpi11:35
gnomefreakwe use deb11:35
gnomefreakask him to see if ours works. mine i know is bumped not sure if official has11:35
asacgnomefreak: he is now using upstrema11:36
asacbeause the package one broken11:36
asacgnomefreak: no need to ask him11:36
asache is coming from our package11:36
asacand now is urnning upstream11:36
asacas that works ;)11:36
eagles0513875asac:  have you see bug 425695 and the comment gnomefreak made on it11:37
eagles0513875bug 42569511:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 425695 in adblock-plus "adblock-plus needs xpi:depends changed to recommends" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42569511:37
gnomefreakasac: ah from what i read it sounded like he was using thiers. he didnt mention ours at all. when updates are done ill let you know if it works here. if not i will assume my changes fixed it but never pushed to archive, i dont remember who changed it last. i had worked on it for one of the mass ext. bugs but noone cared about my changes and did it themselves11:38
gnomefreakeagles0513875: we were just talking about that.'11:38
eagles0513875ahh11:38
eagles0513875my bad11:38
eagles0513875i was just doing what asac had told me to do11:38
gnomefreakbdrung: push ours and wait for karmic+1 sync (adblock-plus since we can not sync (manully) or automaticly from sid until next cycle11:39
gnomefreakthere should be atleast one ? in there11:41
bdrunggnomefreak: if the debian package switch to mozilla-devscripts, we could sync11:42
gnomefreakbdrung: asac might know better but i think they packaged it on thier own. i don thave a sid chroot nor have time to make one. im only here for a couple of hours today11:44
bdrunggnomefreak: i know better. :p11:44
gnomefreak:)11:45
asacbdrung is the man ;)11:45
gnomefreakbdrung: congrats on MOTU11:47
bdrunggnomefreak: thanks11:48
gnomefreakoh no damn next bugday is firefox-3.5 just thinking the amount of email ill get :(11:49
andvasac, gnomefreak: was on phone sorry11:49
gnomefreakandv: np11:49
andvasac, gnomefreak: did you tell me something to check / do?11:49
gnomefreakandv: i was thinking just a little adjustment in rules but im not sure why it doesnt work with m-d 1511:50
gnomefreak0.15 sorry11:51
gnomefreakwhat is latest it works with?11:51
andvit did not have any m-d B-D11:51
andvthat's why it worked11:51
andv:)11:51
andvwhen I've added it it stopped working11:51
asacandv: yes. more extension reviews ;) ... in particular updating our greasemonkey to latest upstream11:51
gnomefreakah that is a fairly good reason :)11:51
asacbug 42779011:52
andvasac, greasemonkey? any problem with it?11:52
asacsee the bug11:52
andvasac, ubottu is not here11:52
andv;)11:52
asachttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/42779011:52
gnomefreakIIRC greasemonkey was a bit of a mess but i havent touched it in a while11:52
asacwhile doing that greasmonkey should be properly moved to new mozilla-devscript packaging imo11:53
asace.g. just processed as normal11:53
gnomefreakit may be down a while seems to be having problems11:53
andvasac, one question, I have a package which doesnt run on kde cause a missing dep11:54
andvasac, but it is a GTK2 app11:54
andvasac, so not really designed for kde11:54
andvasac, should I add it anyway?11:54
andvasac, e.g for ppl who wanna have both kde and gnome-desktop installed?11:54
asacpackages always need all the required depends11:55
gnomefreak+111:55
andvk11:55
andvgonna fix it11:55
andveagles0513875, please report the bug11:55
asac${shlibs:Depends} should usually do that for you11:55
asacif its a binary dependency11:55
asacif there are packages on top for a valid reason they must be added too11:55
asacespecially if the program doesnt work at all without it11:55
andvasac, yeah, it fails to startup with a python-glade2 missing dep error11:56
asacwhats the error you see?11:57
andvasac, http://pastebin.com/m6d51ba6111:57
asacoh its python11:57
asacyeah11:57
asacneeds to be added to depends11:57
andvyep, python11:57
andvok11:57
asacif its a package from debian also send the debdiff to them11:58
andvok11:58
andvyeah, it's synced from debian11:58
andvasac, let me open the bugs11:58
andvasac, does greasemonkey have some problems?11:58
asacthe package is currently not working at all because of that bug11:59
asacin ffox 3.511:59
asacits "disabled as being incompatible"11:59
asacjust update to latest upstream11:59
asacthat should work11:59
andvok12:00
andvadded on todos12:00
asacthx12:00
andvfixing this nicotine bug12:00
andvasac, added: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nicotine/+bug/42779612:02
andvasac, I found this out while testing a backport to approve12:03
andv^^12:03
gnomefreakasac: seems suse fixed the KDE support. for firefox12:04
andvgnomefreak, is possible to link a bug to each other12:05
andvif both of them are into LP?12:06
gnomefreakandv: what do you mean?12:06
andvgnomefreak, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/jaunty-backports/+bug/409979/+distrotask12:06
andvgnomefreak, I wanted to link it to a bug which is hosted on LP12:06
gnomefreakandv: not sure.12:09
andvlooks like I can't12:09
gnomefreakasac: few things. this is OpenSuse KDE intergrations stuff: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/FirefoxIntegration12:09
gnomefreakandv: try in #launchpad12:10
asaci know about that one12:10
asaci havent seen the patches12:10
andvasac, gonna fix greasemonkey this evening / night12:10
gnomefreakasac: the other thing is please look at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422745  last i heard there was no separate alterntives for flash12:10
asachopefully they upstream them or mconnor takes care that they don't ship that .... otherwise we will get complains for ages ;)12:11
andvasac, gonna provide you the package when done, for a review12:11
asac"opensuse ships kde integration .. why no ubuntu"12:11
gnomefreakasac: IMHO we should wait for a non hacked version anyway12:12
asacagreed12:12
gnomefreakthe only thing is last i heard they stopped working on it (or alteast came to an impass)12:13
asaci think the gnash bug is something we should fix12:13
asaclet me see if i didnt do that yet12:13
gnomefreakwouldnt it be under the xul* alternatives?12:14
asaciceape is old style mozilla12:15
asacthey dont look there12:15
asacbut its not really the problem here12:15
asacthe problem is something different12:15
gnomefreakasac: ok, i was going on the way he put it.   WTF is RTE Player 0.2.354.390 and do we support it?12:18
asacgnomefreak: fixing it now12:18
gnomefreakgnash?12:19
asacyes12:19
gnomefreakasac: ok12:19
eagles0513875andv: ? what bug12:20
asacfixed12:23
asacuploading12:23
eagles0513875ok12:23
asacgnomefreak: uplaoded. in case the guy still has the same bug let me know (or other upgrade errors there)12:23
asacgnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu3_source.changes:12:23
gnomefreakasac: i saw a few IIRC. i will not be here for at least until the 21st of this month12:24
asacleaving today?12:24
gnomefreakoh well time for smoke email locked up12:25
gnomefreakasac: yes this moring12:25
gnomefreakmorning even12:25
asacgnomefreak: enjoy your honeymoon!!!12:26
gnomefreakasac: thanks i hope to :)12:26
gnomefreakasac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42728012:27
gnomefreakok smoke for real this time12:27
asacjdstrand: pitti needs your input on how to copy stuff from ppa to proposed12:27
gnomefreakdidnt think you could12:31
gnomefreakok who is Robert Ancell?12:33
gnomefreakasac: seems ^^ assigned yelp FTBFS to you. im expected because its XUL related12:33
andveagles0513875, I did it np12:39
andvgnomefreak, have fun during your honeymoon!!!12:40
gnomefreakandv: thanks :) its going to be a while until that happens first fly to NJ than drive into NYC than sunday fly out to Sicily12:41
andvgnomefreak, aww, I live in udine (italy)12:41
andvwhich is quite a bit far away from sicily12:41
gnomefreakyep it is i wanted venice but she didnt like that idea but she has family in Sicily to i agreed.12:42
andvI'm 100 kms from venice12:43
andvso pretty near12:43
andvfrom sicily is around 120012:43
andvor more12:43
gnomefreakthat is far12:45
andvyep12:45
andv^^12:45
gnomefreakbdrung: i just sent email to bug report on adblock i know i should have asked it in here but email is what i am most concerned about atm12:48
gnomefreakim thinking let wait for new upstream version until we push to Sid the more i think of it12:49
bdrungearlier it is not possible12:49
gnomefreakbdrung: for Sid?12:51
* gnomefreak not sure what upstream version is atm12:51
bdrungits current12:51
gnomefreakbdrung: ok thanks12:52
* gnomefreak coffee smoke than found out whats wrong with apt'dpkg12:52
gnomefreakasac: with the umd 3.5 greasemonkey works fine (my modified version)12:57
gnomefreakthis is after todays updates12:58
asacgnomefreak: whats the problem with just updating to whatever is shipped by addons.mozilla.org?12:59
gnomefreakasac: i can but IIRC it was a mess but i have enough time to look at it13:00
asacits ok13:00
asacsomeone else can do that13:00
asacenjoy your honeymoon13:00
asacsend us a pic ;)13:01
bdrunggnomefreak: i have nothing prepared for debian. first step will be to contact the debian maintainer13:01
asacsitting below the palm trees ;)13:01
asacnot sure where yo going though13:01
* gnomefreak going to Sicily13:01
gnomefreakkarmic repos are screwedc up. its tell me gnome-games-common and others WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! i dont have an ppa for them and Get:1 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main libempathy-gtk-common 2.27.92-0ubuntu2 [444kB] is where its getting them from13:03
asacthats not nice13:03
asaci dont know what the reason could be13:03
asacat best dont upgrade it13:03
asactry a different mirror13:03
asacmaybe your mirror has bad bits/bytes13:03
gnomefreakhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/269115/13:04
* asac listens to "Aces High" ... hasnt heard that for 10 years or so ;)13:04
asacgnomefreak: dont install13:04
asacuse different mirror13:04
gnomefreakasac: ok13:04
gnomefreaktrying it.*13:06
gnomefreakaces high by Iorn Maiden?13:08
asacyeah!!13:08
gnomefreakIron even13:08
* gnomefreak loves them been listening for many years :)13:11
gnomefreak2nd metal band i got into (after Metallica)13:11
gnomefreakandv: are your mirros *it.*?13:12
gnomefreakmirror even13:12
andvyes13:12
gnomefreakim getting a 404 on all of them13:13
gnomefreakErr http://it.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main gstreamer0.10-alsa 0.10.24-2       404 Not Found [IP: 193.206.139.34 80]13:13
gnomefreakupdate works fine but downloading packages i get the 40413:14
asacgnomefreak: use archive.ubuntu.com13:15
asacno language variant13:15
gnomefreakk that will give me us archive though at least as i understand it it will automaticly get from closest lang.13:16
gnomefreakus seems to work for once13:17
asaci dont think so13:17
gnomefreakubottu: hi13:17
asacotherwise just run apt-get update in 1hour on your gb mirror and hope that its fixed13:17
gnomefreakus is working atm i will cange toi nothing when its done13:19
ubottuHi! Welcome to #ubuntu-mozillateam!13:19
asachehe13:20
asacubottu: any new features?13:20
asacor were you just sick?`13:20
asac!now13:20
asac@now13:20
asac!time13:20
asac@time13:20
ubottuError: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)13:20
gnomefreakhe crashed and came back crashes again13:20
ubottuSorry, I don't know anything about now13:20
asaci want time back13:20
ubottuInformation about using and setting your computer's clock on Ubuntu can be found at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuTime - See https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/serverguide/C/NTP.html for information on usage of the Network Time Protocol (NTP)13:20
gnomefreaknow back to mormal i hope13:20
gnomefreakem:maxVersion>3.1b2</em:maxVersion>   needs to be fixed :) that is upstream version. if seb is using upstream and it works im suprized13:24
gnomefreakversion 0.8.20090123.1-fx13:25
gnomefreakthat is latest upstream version as i have in PPA13:26
gnomefreakno newer version on addons.firefox13:26
gnomefreakah forgot (greasemonkey13:26
gnomefreak013:26
andvasac, are you sure greasemonkey requires a new upstream release?13:27
andvasac, is greasemonkey-0.8.20090123.1-fx latest?13:27
andvasac, in archives we have greasemonkey-0.8.20090123.113:27
asacandv: i am sure that the upstream .xpi is different from our .upstream13:27
asacat least the install.rdf is different13:28
* gnomefreak wonders why no newer version. asac tell him to try the version in my PPA sinces it is working here13:28
gnomefreakandv: it cant13:28
gnomefreaknewest version is in my PPA with fixed install.rdf13:28
gnomefreakasac: nope13:28
andvgnomefreak, there is no new upstream release13:28
gnomefreaki was just looking at it. see pasted lines from install.rdf13:28
andvVersion  0.8.20090123.113:28
andvis the same we have in archive13:29
gnomefreak.:08:24:38:. <      gnomefreak > em:maxVersion>3.1b2</em:maxVersion>   needs to  be fixed :) that is upstream version. if seb  is using upstream and it works im suprized13:29
andvfrom what https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748 says13:29
asacfolkd13:29
asacfolks13:29
asacjust take the upstream .xpi13:29
asacdiff it with our .upstream branch13:29
asacif its just the install.rdf then we want to just take that change "as new upstream" ;)13:29
asacno rocket science13:29
asacbut you never know what greasemonkey folks are doing13:30
asacat least they bumped the maxVersion there13:30
andvasac, found out13:30
asacgood ;)13:30
andvasac, why it does not work on ffox3.513:30
andvasac, the max version is set to: <em:maxVersion>3.1b2</em:maxVersion>13:31
andvasac, that should be fixed13:31
gnomefreakandv: its 3.1pre in upstream not sure what ours has. im looking in my PPA for it but i think i lost it13:31
gnomefreakthat will work using 3.6* IIRC13:32
andvgnomefreak, where that branch is hosted?13:32
gnomefreakeasy enough to fix. andv it was removed from my PPA or atleast gone atm let me see if i still have branch13:33
gnomefreakhttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/greasemonkey.ubuntu andv13:33
gnomefreakand mine works great :)13:33
andvgnomefreak, the fix is just to adjust maxversion13:34
gnomefreakif someone feels like pushing feel free :) testing for a long time now :)13:34
gnomefreakandv: yes13:34
gnomefreakand deps (new changes we need to make13:34
gnomefreak)*13:34
andvgnomefreak, if asac is ok with it, I will review / push it13:34
andvgnomefreak, do it have new m-d stuff?13:34
gnomefreakandv: let me make the xpi changes first13:34
andvk13:34
gnomefreakandv: nope this was before that13:34
andvgnomefreak, update m-d stuff too13:35
* gnomefreak working on it should be done soon. is ther ea xpi bug on it?13:35
andvgnomefreak, Depends: firefox | abrowser | firefox-3.5 is wrong, that's why I said that to you13:35
andvgnomefreak, yes13:35
andvgnomefreak, there is a bug13:35
andvwait13:35
andvgnomefreak, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/greasemonkey/+bug/42779013:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427790 in greasemonkey "should be updated to a version compatible with firefox 3.5" [Undecided,New]13:36
gnomefreaksebs bug should be a dupe of that. eagles0513875 you never set up an xpi bug for greasemonkey but doesnt matter too much13:37
andvgnomefreak, when done, update the wiki page as well13:37
andvgnomefreak, I've added some new fields as well13:38
gnomefreakandv: ok thanks. please add this one if not already13:38
andvk13:39
gnomefreakasac: do you have sebs bug handy?13:39
asacwhat do you want?13:40
gnomefreaki have it13:40
andvgnomefreak, bug assigned to you13:40
gnomefreakandv: thanks13:40
andvnp13:40
asacplease dont ask him questions ;)13:41
asache is already busy enough13:41
asacthe bug is as it is13:41
asacjust update to latest xpi from upstream13:41
asacif thats just install.rdf then thats how it is13:41
asacah ok duped13:42
asacgood13:42
asacgnomefreak: no13:42
asacthats a different bug13:42
gnomefreakasac: i didnt plan on it13:42
asacthats not fun13:42
asaci told seb to file those two separately13:43
asacdont dupe13:43
gnomefreakit is same bug13:43
asacit is not13:43
asaconly do bug 42779013:43
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427790 in greasemonkey "should be updated to a version compatible with firefox 3.5" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42779013:43
asacthe other bug is something else13:43
gnomefreakasac: and his fails to work on it due to compat.13:43
gnomefreakhow is that different (same install.rdf changes13:44
asacgnomefreak: dont bother with that. if you read the bug carefully you will see that its different13:44
asacbug 42778913:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427789 in firefox-3.5 ""Not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3" displayed after installing greasemonkey from firefox" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42778913:44
asacthats != 42779013:44
gnomefreaki just did13:44
asacyes. then you didnt see the difference13:45
gnomefreaki didint at first13:45
asack13:45
gnomefreak!info greasemonkey13:49
ubottugreasemonkey (source: greasemonkey): firefox extension that enables customization of webpages with user scripts. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.8.20090123.1-0ubuntu2 (karmic), package size 89 kB, installed size 1012 kB13:49
gnomefreakjust making sure13:49
* asac lunch13:57
gnomefreakandv: pushing to m-e-d branches13:58
gnomefreakandv: waiting for it to populate on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/greasemonkey.ubuntu fixed 2 bugs13:59
andvgnomefreak, did you fix m-d stuff too?14:00
gnomefreakandv: yes14:00
gnomefreakandv: right now adding to the wiki14:01
andvgnomefreak, did you add reference to the wiki into the changelog?14:01
andvlike I did with ubuntu-it-menu14:01
andvgnomefreak, check ubuntu-it-menu changelog for an example14:02
gnomefreakandv: no but i will thats easy enough14:03
andvyep14:03
andvif not i gonna do it np14:03
gnomefreakandv: ok please do. im trying to catch up on everything. we need the wiki updated later for other extensions but maybe eagles0513875 was going to do that?14:04
andvgnomefreak, would be really great to have the wiki page updated with some other extensions14:04
andvwe have 8 now14:04
andvand as asac said we have more than 4014:05
gnomefreakandv: yep. but right now im trying to figure this out :)14:05
andvso please eagles0513875 please add them14:05
andvadd them properly14:05
andvwith right links et on14:05
gnomefreakshit dont touch it now14:07
gnomefreakoh wtf14:10
andvplease don't tell it's fucke** now14:11
gnomefreaki cant seem to get the table to line up for some reason. w14:12
gnomefreak-w14:12
gnomefreakandv: why! can you look at it while i go smoke please?14:12
andvgnomefreak, fixed14:15
andvgnomefreak, look now14:16
gnomefreakandv: looking what did you do to fix it?14:16
andvsome white spaces randomly added14:16
gnomefreakwell little off i can fix this part14:17
andvgnomefreak, fix the bug14:17
andvgnomefreak, and move it to the right column14:17
gnomefreaki am14:17
andvgrat14:17
andvgreat14:17
gnomefreakcant im missing something but one minute14:21
andvjust remove the (./) placed in wrong column and replace with the bug url14:22
gnomefreaknope i end up with it like the table was last time14:23
andvcheck for free spaces then14:24
gnomefreakdamnit14:24
gnomefreaknope that didnt work either14:27
gnomefreakhmmmm14:27
gnomefreakok wtf if i remove the extra (./) and fix spaces it still ends up on another line14:30
andva | should be removed somewhere14:30
gnomefreakfixed14:31
andvgreat14:31
gnomefreakandv: thanks14:31
andvnp14:32
gnomefreakwikis are still a pain in the ass14:32
andvgnomefreak, is the branch ready?14:32
gnomefreakoh crap i think so but one sec14:32
andvdid you update what asac said us?14:32
gnomefreakok let me find out what you wanted me to do unless you already did it?14:32
andvgnomefreak, nope, im leaving14:33
andvcheck ubuntu-it-menu changelog for an example14:33
gnomefreakandv: ok ill look14:33
andvgnomefreak, then drop me an email with mozgest branch to review / push14:33
gnomefreakandv: ok14:33
andvand greasemonkey branch to review / push14:33
gnomefreakandv: where did you push ubuntu-it-menu to? i thought it was this but i dont see it14:34
gnomefreakits not https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev14:35
andvgnomefreak, ~ubuntu-dev14:35
gnomefreakah ok14:36
gnomefreakok updating the branch. pushed waiting for LP to update14:45
gnomefreakwe should add a few things to the bug reports. i will add to wiki i think14:45
andvok14:46
andvas I said drop me an email14:46
andvI'll catch it14:46
andvlater14:46
* andv off14:47
gnomefreakasac: please see wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview i added a few things to the Checklist section. maybe add an example or a link to example. but i have a few things to do and im gone :)14:50
gnomefreakexample https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/greasemonkey.ubuntu but it will be merged so we need a stable place as example14:51
eagles0513875WOOOOHOOO PASSED MY linux exam part one14:54
gnomefreakeagles0513875: congrats. you should have email about the extension wiki. we need to add more extensions to the list ( alot more)14:56
eagles0513875ok14:57
eagles0513875im under pressure on 2 fronts14:57
gnomefreakchatzilla cant be done until someone packages seamonkey-1.1.18. i wont be able to upgrade it this month and it needs to be done soonish. some patches issues on nss nspr14:58
eagles0513875gnomefreak: i could probably package if need be but knowing my luck i would have to try it a few times before its right14:58
gnomefreakeagles0513875: the nss/nspr is not that of an easy fix. and mips patches need to be dropped as well.14:59
eagles0513875ahhh ok not a good place for me to start then15:00
gnomefreakeagles0513875: no not on that. tbird-3 lost tool bar buttons :(15:02
eagles0513875:(15:03
gnomefreaki would say best to start with small fixes ojn a package and build it than (just a command unless something major changed15:04
eagles0513875i need to get karmic up and running on my laptop after i upgrade to 64bit snow leopard cuz right now i cannot install it what so ever15:04
eagles0513875i woudl upgrade but was told for testing purposes its best to do a clean install15:05
gnomefreak!info firefox-3.015:13
ubottufirefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): safe and easy web browser from Mozilla. In component universe, is optional. Version 3.0.14+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (karmic), package size 887 kB, installed size 3516 kB15:13
gnomefreak!info firefox-3.0 jaunty15:18
ubottufirefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): safe and easy web browser from Mozilla. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.14+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 (jaunty), package size 867 kB, installed size 3456 kB15:18
jdstrandasac: not sure what the problem is, but if I use ubuntu-bug I get: http://paste.ubuntu.com/269195/15:20
gnomefreakisnt there an open bug on the Xwindow crashes?15:28
gnomefreakalthough i dont remember the 60715:28
eagles0513875btw asac and gnomefreak will work on the extensions this weekend after the funeral tomorrow15:28
asacjdstrand: yes. thats a known issue i have a bandaid fix for15:29
gnomefreakeagles0513875: thats fine i will be gone for a week or more15:29
asacand there is a fix landed on trunk ... it seems to be a race15:29
asacjdstrand: bug 40105515:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 401055 in xorg-server "[MASTER] Gdk-ERROR **: The program 'firefox-3.5' received an X Window System error (BadWindow)" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40105515:29
eagles0513875asac:  bandaid is good but question is how long will it be before it falls off15:30
gnomefreakwhen truck gets fix we will remove bandaid15:30
asaci would think you have no real qualified opinion on that one :)15:30
asacgnomefreak is right ;)15:30
jdstrandasac: thanks15:30
asacwe havent even added a bandaid to ffox 3.5 ... just for that reason: dont hide15:30
gnomefreakok guys thats it for me. we are bringing her laptop so i will have some access to email. asac feel free to update SM-1.1.18 with the nss/nspr. iceape from Mike should have the fixes already im guessing just grab patches but i havent had time to look at it or work on it since mike fixed it in Debian15:32
asacgnomefreak: great. enjoy your holiday. see you back in best shape and fully recharged15:33
asac2 weeks you are back?15:33
asaccu then!15:33
asacok folks i was told by boss to take off the rest of the day15:33
asacso before i get fired i am sliding to weekend mode ;)15:34
gnomefreakasac: give or take 1 week-whenever we decide to come back. she has off til oct 4th15:36
gnomefreakasac: have a great weekend.15:36
asacgnomefreak: where are you going?15:36
gnomefreakasac: NJ>NYC>NJ>Sicily all this weekend :)15:37
asacSicily?15:37
asacisnt that in italy ;)15:37
asacwherever. if you are going to a beach or something send a pic ;)15:38
asac;)15:38
asaccu then15:38
gnomefreakasac: its attached to most southern end. its a different contrey, has its own capital even :)15:40
gnomefreaki will take pics if we leave hotel ;)15:41
gnomefreakok emails done. gone to get ready for airport15:41
fta217h, let's see if it's green today ;)16:01
micahgping asac re ff3.6.daily16:59
micahgasac: I wasn't sure about the things that you mentioned in the merge proposals17:02
micahgI will do that properly in the future17:02
micahgI was wondering if that was for trunk only17:03
mconnorasac: I'm doing what now?17:34
[reed]mconnor: making sure openSUSE doesn't ship KDE integration patches with Firefox17:37
[reed]http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/FirefoxIntegration17:37
[reed](as in, make sure they upstream the patches)17:37
mconnorman17:38
mconnorthat's So Not My Job17:38
[reed](just repeating what asac/gnomefreak were saying)17:38
mconnoryeah17:39
mconnorrelayed to appropriate people17:39
[reed]it looks like an add-on17:40
[reed]trying to find where the code is now17:40
[reed]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pyp5bX_NV6k17:46
[reed]youtube video of it17:46
[reed]http://gitorious.org/firefox-kde-opensuse/firefox-kde-opensuse/trees/master17:47
=== jtv is now known as jtv-afk
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
ftamicahg, asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31663504/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.firefox-3.7_3.7~a1~hg20090911r32412%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~jaunty_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz19:23
micahgugh19:24
micahgthat's a new problem :)19:24
micahgI'll see what I can do19:28
micahgfta: I'm testing now19:48
micahgit's jsut a rebase19:48
micahgfta: I'm waiting for the test build on LP20:10
micahgfta: 25 minutes till the test build starts20:18
BUGabundoguud evening kids21:08
BUGabundoasac: NM / MM still broken on boot :)21:08
micahgfta: build succesful and tested21:28
micahgbranch is here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7.head.daily-patch-rebase-20090911/+merge/1162621:28
micahgping asac ^^^21:29
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
* BUGabundo stupid 3G21:30
* micahg guesses no one is around to fix the dailies21:33
micahghi BUGabundo21:33
BUGabundohey micahg21:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!