/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/09/14/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

hjmfbug #428888 and bug #428901 not sure what caused them07:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 428888 in firefox-3.5 "firefox crashed with nsScriptSecurityManager::SecurityCompareURI" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42888807:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 428901 in firefox-3.5 "firefox crashed with nsScriptSecurityManager::CheckPropertyAccessImpl" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42890107:02
bdrung_asac: can you have a look at my changes to mozilla-devscripts?08:46
asacnow here09:32
asacagain09:32
sebnerhuhu asac :D09:39
asachi sebner09:42
micahgasac: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/124144309:48
micahgI didn't know how to fix this one09:49
micahgbut I have to go to sleep09:49
asacmicahg: enjoy09:49
asacerr sleep well ;)09:49
micahgnight09:50
bdrung_asac: can you have a look at my changes to mozilla-devscripts?09:54
asacbdrung_: yeah. one second09:59
asachave to finish gnome-bluetooth first09:59
asacbdrung_: did you push to mozillateam branch? or topic?10:00
asacok10:04
bdrung_asac: to mozillateam branch10:09
asacbdrung_: looks good. only question is the REPACKGED thing10:16
asacwhy do we need this? e.g. i would expect that a user that has .xpi packed would just set BUILD_COMMAND to zero or something10:17
bdrung_asac: oh, yes thats the better solution10:18
bdrung_asac: is this list complete: Ubuntu_packages := abrowser-3.5 firefox-3.0 firefox-3.5 thunderbird seamonkey conkeror prism xulrunner-1.9 xulrunner-1.9.110:19
bdrung_for karmic?10:19
|eagles0513875|hey guys10:20
|eagles0513875|dang nabbit10:20
asacbdrung_: let me check something10:22
bdrung_asac: i have reverted MOZ_XPI_PREPACKED, now it's ready for release (if Ubuntu_packages is correct)10:51
asacbdrung_: will have a phone call with mvo after lunch if we can do the manual dependencies differently10:52
bdrung_asac: manual dependencies?10:53
eagles0513875asac: still working on finishing up those extensions i havent finished yet10:55
asacok10:56
asacthx10:56
asacbdrung_: yes our applicatioN/version/id mapping10:56
eagles0513875asac: just a question outa curiosity here11:00
eagles0513875are all the branches that people forked gonna get cleaned up at some point11:00
asaceagles0513875: i try to remember folks to do that. but i think its not likely that we will get 100% clean at some point11:02
eagles0513875ok asac its just hard to find the ubuntu-dev branches with all that clutter though11:02
eagles0513875is there a way on the page you can have it keep the ubuntu-dev branches separate and any forks of those branches in a separate table further down on the page11:03
asaceagles0513875: sort by the column "maturity"11:03
asacmost ~ubuntu-dev should be marked as mature11:03
asacif you find one that isnt let me know11:03
asaci will mark it accordingly11:03
eagles0513875ok11:03
eagles0513875will look after i finish up what i started the other day11:04
asacgood11:04
asacbdrung_: so one thing i have on my list to fix for next mozilla-devscripts is to fix the LOCAL_BRANCH feature for CVS11:10
asacwhich holds back the dailies fore firefox 3.0 (needed to unbreak hardy/intrepid dailies)11:11
asacfor 3.511:11
bdrung_LOCAL_BRANCH?11:11
asacfta said it was required ;)11:11
asacbdrung_: yes. so ./debian/rules get-orig-source LOCAL_BRANCH=/path/to/clean/cvs/checkout11:11
asacwill not pull the full tree, but just "update" the path11:12
asacand then use that tree to produce the orig.tar.gzu11:12
asacfta said CVS lOCAL_BRANCH feature is buggy somewhat11:12
bdrung_interesting11:12
bdrung_an other solution would be bzr-builder?11:13
asacbdrung_: bzr-builder is no solution ;)11:29
bdrung_k11:30
asacits just a different approach ... which is even less flexible last time i looked11:30
asaci dont think it has a "cache upstream branches locally" feature11:30
asacbut i am not really qualified for that11:30
asachavent looked for ages, because it took far too long and so fta made his own solution which works quite good11:30
ftaasac, if you fix it for CVS, please also have a look at HG, it's not able to create the local branch while it should, it's just able to update it12:09
asackk12:12
ftaasac, for cvs, it should be easy, initially, i wanted to clone from the local copy, that's not supported by cvs, but a cp -a is enough12:26
ftagrrr http://paste.ubuntu.com/270826/12:32
asac!test12:34
ubottuyes, I'm alive.12:34
asacgzip is just falling apart12:37
ftayes, but why is it not a critical bug?12:38
asaci havent seen that problem for ages12:38
asacnot sure why you get that12:38
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/270830/12:39
ftaamd6412:43
asacmine is amd64 too12:45
asacuname -a12:45
asacLinux hector 2.6.31-10-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 10 23:29:56 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux12:45
* asac lunch13:00
bdrung_eagles0513875: you can use mozilla-devscripts for firebug. you simply have to set "MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND :=" (to nothing)13:34
ftause $(NULL), nothing is confusing13:36
asacyes $(NULL) is good13:51
ftaasac, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/124144414:51
* popey waves bug 412125 at asac :)14:53
ubottuLaunchpad bug 412125 in nspluginwrapper "Controls in video player no longer work" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41212514:53
asacpopey: hey ;)14:56
popeythat bug is starting to get on my nerves :)14:56
asacpopey: when did that start?14:56
popeyit's a productivity bonus though, I cant click on any flash stuff :)14:56
asachehe14:57
popeystart of August14:57
asachmm14:57
asacok assigned to me14:57
asaci will try to get a newer pluginwrapper up14:57
asac(if i can reproduce)14:57
popeythanks, much appreciated14:57
popeyif there's any further tracing or logging I can get, let me know14:57
popeyI have two independant installs of 64-bit ubuntu which both have the same behaviour14:58
popeyone is pretty much an out of the box install14:58
popeyI suspect I could also replicate it with a 64-bit live cd14:58
popeywill grab the alpha 5 amd64 iso just to be sure14:58
asacfta: was greprefs removed?14:59
asachmm. we should run a find so i dont need a full build to see what has changed in the "make install" hierarchy15:00
ftaasac, wasn't greprefs from one of your patches?15:04
jdstrandasac: hi!. can you merge r465 from bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/firefox/firefox-3.5-apparmor/? it fixes a couple profiling bugs15:05
asacfta: greprefs was not from my patches15:13
asacgreprefs was there since ever upstream15:13
asaci made a patch once to also honour gre-greprefs for the "general.config.filename"15:13
asacjdstrand: make a merge request ;)15:15
asacfta: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/log?rev=greprefs15:16
asacso seems all is good still15:16
asac(backed out)15:16
asacseems to match15:16
asace.g. 17:32 the backout landed ... so _after_ our daily snapshot15:16
ftak15:16
jdstrandasac: done. it would be great if this could get into ubuntu3. thanks!15:18
asacsure ;) ... you are the owner of that profile. so i dont think i would reject anything ;)15:19
asacjdstrand: oh. did you do the same for all the other branches?15:19
asace.g. firefox.37 3.6 etc.?15:19
asacor did we already do that last time?15:19
jdstrandasac: no, just 3.515:20
asacjdstrand: why did you do "merge from trunk"?15:21
jdstrandasac: I wasn't aware of the others. but the merge should go to all branches15:21
asacyou should have started from scratch for next update imo15:21
asacno ... what i mean is that you kep on using your already merged branch15:21
asacinstead of doing a new branch for this update15:21
jdstrandasac: it isn't actually trunk, it is bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.1.head/, which I happened to call 'trunk' in my commit log15:22
asacyes15:22
asaci know ;)15:22
jdstrandasac: ok. what do you need me to do to get this right?15:22
asacwhat changes did you do? just 465?15:23
jdstrandasac: yes15:23
asaci will pick that mark it merged manually15:23
asacnext time create  a new branch ;)15:23
jdstrandasac: thanks. I shall15:23
asacjdstrand: ok committed. please mark your branch merged ;)15:27
asacfta: so yes. i think all is good15:28
asacbuild should work today without touching15:28
ftawe'll see15:28
ftaasac, do you get the build logs now? umd, ucd, etc..15:29
asaci get the upload logs15:29
asacnot the build failures ;)15:29
ftahm15:29
asacfta: well. i think i get them for everything, but umd15:31
ftawhat is different with umd then?15:32
asacmailing list15:37
ftait's a lp bug then15:37
asaci am not sure. could be that those mails go to /dev/null on my side15:38
asaci gues thats even likely15:38
asacfta: do you have a header of one of the recent failures?15:38
asaconly have /dev/null procmail rules for X-Launchpad-Bugs... that i dont explicitly take15:40
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/270965/15:40
asachmm. not in procmail log15:41
asac(the message id)15:41
* asac checks spam folders15:41
asacseems i really dont get them15:42
asacok let me unsubscribe from that ml15:42
ftamaybe the Message-id is per recipient15:42
asacok unsubscribed15:42
asaclets hope that helps15:43
ftathe only redirection i have for you is for ^X-launchpad-ppa:\ network-manager-trunk15:46
asacthats ok ... actually i would hope i dont need it ;) (but doesnt hurt)16:02
asaci think i will get umd tomorrow now that i unsubscribed from ml16:03
* asac needs to remember to file a bug16:03
asacQuestion #82761]: The debs are currently not building16:09
asacfta: whats going on with all those .o files?16:10
asachttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/31760218/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.chromium-browser_4.0.209.0~svn20090913r26091-0ubuntu1~ucd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz16:10
asacwhy are thos in the "inhammer" ?16:10
micahgasac: is bug 428977 a dupe of bug 427789?16:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 428977 in firefox-3.5 "firefox 3.5.3 - extensions do not update" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42897716:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 427789 in firefox-3.5 ""Not compatible with Firefox 3.5.3" displayed after installing greasemonkey from AMO" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42778916:18
sebnerasac: Is that normal that firefox/epiphany crash when using fullscreen mode without 3D driver?16:19
ftaasac, i regression in gyp, i'm waiting for today's build to see if it has been fixed16:19
asackk16:29
asacmicahg: i dont think so16:30
asacwill check when back16:30
asacout for 2-3h16:30
eagles0513875bdrung_: saw u pmed me earlier if you would like to take any of the extensions with my name on them you may17:01
eagles0513875bdrung_: is the password has you have mentioned on the wiki the same as https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/stanford-pwdhash.ubuntu17:04
bdrung_eagles0513875: The stanford-pwdhash source package was renamed to pwdhash. It is maintained in a git repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/pwdhash.git;a=summary17:14
eagles0513875ok just checking17:14
eagles0513875is there a new ubuntu-dev branch for it17:14
bdrung_no17:14
eagles0513875ok17:14
eagles0513875will file a bug against that17:14
eagles0513875nm already did17:15
bdrung_i maintain it in debian17:15
eagles0513875gotcha17:15
bdrung_bug is already filed17:15
eagles0513875bdrung_: where it says branch for paswd hash should i put where you have the - change it to maintained upstream17:16
bdrung_yes17:17
ftaasac, what is the best way to drop chromium-testsuite(|-dbg) without stopping their users from upgrading? "Provides/Replaces"?18:12
eagles0513875bdrung_: sry to bother you but whats the difference between flashgot and flashblock?18:13
eagles0513875fta: feel free to answer my question if you know since your the only one in hre18:14
Mook_sbeagles0513875: flashgot downloads things from web pages, flashblock stops you from downloading things (flash) until you tell it to18:16
eagles0513875Mook_sb: ty m818:17
eagles0513875just making sure they arent one in the same thing18:17
Mook_sbfwiw, searching on amo like https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/220 would tell you the same18:17
eagles0513875Mook_sb: thanks bro18:17
=== greg_g is now known as greg-g
eagles0513875well good news for u guys almost finished filing the bugs and the wiki with all the extensions18:21
eagles0513875has the package name for flashgot changed cuz lp is saying its not published18:35
BUGabundohoias19:40
ftaBUGabundo, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-popcon-7.png19:46
BUGabundosteady?? wow19:46
ftai regained ~750 users19:47
ftacompared to mid-july19:47
bdrung_eagles0513875: flashgot = downloader, flashblock = blocks flash19:48
andvfta, a guy said some bad things about chromium before21:58
ftaandv, such as?22:14
andvMan.  Chromium just ate itself on my computer22:14
andvSpread files into my home directory22:14
andvLike this one: ls \<\?xml\ version=\"1.0\"\ encoding=\"UTF-8\"\?\>\<gupdate\ xmlns=\"http:/www.google.com/update2/response\"\ p22:15
andvprotocol=\"2.0\"\>\<app\ appid=\"com.google.crx.blacklist\"\ status=\"ok\"\>\<updatecheck\ status=\"noupdate\"/\>\</app\>\</TEMP_INSTALL22:15
andvAnd typing a URL closes the browser saying: [17910:17932:270726677291:FATAL:/mnt/chromium/rpmbuild/BUILD/chromium-20090910svn25958/src/chrome/common/sqlite_utils.cc(52)] Check failed: false. sqlite fatal error 1122:15
andv<xkahn> What an awesome browser.  :)22:15
andvI hope we dont have this error22:15
andv:)22:15
fta /mnt/chromium/rpmbuild/ is not an ubuntu thing22:17
andvthat's why I told you I hope we don't have that here22:19
BUGabundofta: ia32 failing to build or something ?22:23
ftaia32?22:24
ftaBUGabundo, ia32?22:24
BUGabundoia libs 3222:26
ftaBUGabundo, i didn't touch it recently, so no idea22:28
BUGabundofta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/271223/22:31
ftaBUGabundo, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/2.7ubuntu14/+build/1243008  refresh22:33
ftaasac, BUGabundo, starting to the next green build, --enable-plugins will no longer be needed \o/22:45
BUGabundoand that is good ?22:46
BUGabundomore flash noise.....22:46
BUGabundowell it works just fine on Chrome/Win without it22:46
ftait was mandatory on linux only22:46
BUGabundoahhhh22:49
BUGabundostupid google devs22:49
* BUGabundo ducks22:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!