| YokoZar | Riddell: I'll fix it today | 00:55 |
|---|---|---|
| kees | nhandler: oh, do you have control over the fridge calendar? for some reason the monday security team meeting doesn't show up (though it's visible in the iCal feed) | 03:45 |
| nhandler | kees: Yeah, I'm not seeing that meeting. If you give me the information, I would be glad to try and add it for you | 03:46 |
| nhandler | kees: Oh wait, you mean the Security Team Catch-Up ? | 03:46 |
| kees | nhandler: yeah | 03:46 |
| nhandler | kees: That is showing up on the calendar for me. 5pm on the 21st on http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | 03:47 |
| kees | I followed the directions on the fridge wiki page, and it showed up in the iCal just fine, but not here: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | 03:47 |
| * kees scratches his head | 03:48 | |
| nhandler | kees: Strange, I am seeing it there. Have you tried clearing your cache? | 03:48 |
| kees | shift-reload, yes, but let's try a full clear, one sec | 03:48 |
| kees | still not there. hrmpf | 03:49 |
| kees | nhandler: is it possible you see it because you have rights to the calendar? | 03:49 |
| nhandler | kees: AFAIK, I don't have any more rights than you do | 03:49 |
| nhandler | kees: An edubuntu user had a similar issue a week or so ago. You might have more luck looking through the Google support information | 03:50 |
| kees | got another person here to load that URL, they don't see it. | 03:50 |
| ScottK | kees: I'm just syncing rails from Debian so we get the fix for DSA 1887-1 in Karmic. | 03:50 |
| kees | one thing I noticed about the iCal is that it's not "accepted" by the fridge yet. (no "response") | 03:50 |
| kees | ScottK: perfect, thanks | 03:50 |
| kees | ScottK: after Alpha6, I was going to try to work my way down the list in the karmic column: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/universe.html | 03:51 |
| nhandler | kees: The fridge will always be listed under "Awaiting response" | 03:51 |
| kees | nhandler: ok. weird. dunno why you see it. :) | 03:52 |
| ScottK | kees: Cool. Well assuming the test build works you can knock one off your list. | 03:52 |
| ScottK | kees: While waiting for Alpha 6 is a good time for Universe stuff since the buildd's are typically not very busy ... | 03:52 |
| kees | ScottK: I'm always nervous I'll touch something that mythbuntu or something uses | 03:53 |
| ScottK | Right. Reasonable fear. | 03:53 |
| ScottK | It'd by nice if LP had a view for that. | 03:53 |
| kees | yeah. I've tried to extract the details before, but it's never been very successful. I only think to bug slangasek or cjwatson about it during a freeze, which is not a good time to distract them. ;) | 03:54 |
| ScottK | At a glance, it looks like it could be scripted with grep-dctrl. | 03:57 |
| slangasek | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/mythbuntu.karmic/all | 04:02 |
| slangasek | kees: ^^ | 04:02 |
| slangasek | (no merged view available, I'm afraid, so you'd have to check mythbuntu && xubuntu) | 04:02 |
| ScottK | Is UNR all in Main now? | 04:03 |
| kees | slangasek: ah-ha, yes. so *.karmic/all should catch all src packages | 04:03 |
| slangasek | ScottK: um... I think so | 04:03 |
| === mruiz changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Karmic Feature Freeze is in effect now! | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://is.gd/2y76G | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck | latest rebuild failures: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test | ||
| === mruiz changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Karmic Feature Freeze is in effect now! | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://is.gd/2y76G | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck | latest rebuild failures: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20090909.html | ||
| happyaron | kees: ping | 05:37 |
| dholbach | good morning | 07:10 |
| === jussi01_ is now known as eviljussi01 | ||
| DktrKranz | ScottK: scipy sync request done. | 07:51 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| AnAnt | why doesn't Ubuntu modify reportbug instead of making a new tool ubuntu-bug/apport ? | 09:31 |
| AnAnt | if a developer wants to add bug reporting scripts for a package that he is preparing, he will have to write both scripts for apport & for reportbug | 09:32 |
| slytherin | AnAnt: Not for both. reportbug is not used in Ubuntu at all. | 09:33 |
| AnAnt | slytherin: well, I meant that if I am preparing the same package for Debian too | 09:33 |
| slytherin | AnAnt: I don't know how either of them works. So can't really comment. | 09:35 |
| james_w | I'm going to be reviewing things for the next hour, so if anyone has any patches they want interactive review on please give me a shout | 10:07 |
| AnAnt | james_w: devscripts ! | 10:08 |
| === mzz_ is now known as mzz | ||
| james_w | AnAnt: you need to redo the merge against the latest version in Ubuntu | 10:24 |
| james_w | I uploaded your previous work | 10:24 |
| james_w | and then uploaded a fix | 10:24 |
| AnAnt | james_w: huh ? didn't I do so ? | 10:25 |
| AnAnt | oh, you uploaded .53 already | 10:25 |
| AnAnt | ok | 10:25 |
| james_w | I forgot to check it mentioned to the bug in the changelog | 10:26 |
| === PLaYSTatiON is now known as SuBmUnDo__ | ||
| AnAnt | james_w: why is XS- prefixed to Vcs-* fields ? | 10:35 |
| james_w | it's not | 10:36 |
| james_w | any more at least | 10:36 |
| AnAnt | ok | 10:37 |
| christoph_debian | XS-* are not removed by dpkg* if the fields are unknown so every field that is not implemented yet must have it | 10:38 |
| christoph_debian | ;) | 10:38 |
| AnAnt | james_w: done | 10:46 |
| === mzz_ is now known as mzz | ||
| === j^_ is now known as j^ | ||
| === happyaron is now known as wildwild | ||
| === wildwild is now known as happyaron | ||
| ScottK | AnAnt: Internally reportbug and ubuntu-bug are very different programs that work very differently. | 11:38 |
| AnAnt | I see | 11:39 |
| AnAnt | well, I think it would be nice to patch dh_bugfiles to install apport scripts in the proper place | 11:39 |
| === krusaf|bnc is now known as krusaf | ||
| === abms1116 is now known as binitamshah | ||
| cortexhugo | Hi. I am new to the world of packaging. I am working through the packaging guide and the recipes (Brasero) on the ubuntu wiki. When i give the command to debuild -S -sa I get a error: debuild: fatal error at line 1329: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S -sa failed. Could someone please advice me here. | 14:55 |
| danbhfive | cortexhugo: I thought it was supposed to fail | 14:56 |
| sebner | cortexhugo: can you post the full error message somewhere? | 15:02 |
| sebner | danbhfive: why? | 15:02 |
| danbhfive | sebner: well, I'm trying to learn myself, but basically, the package is outdated | 15:03 |
| danbhfive | but I don't really know | 15:03 |
| sebner | danbhfive: sure but no reason to fail | 15:03 |
| danbhfive | sebner: according to the guide, you are incorrect | 15:04 |
| danbhfive | sebner: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate | 15:04 |
| sebner | danbhfive: ?? | 15:05 |
| slytherin | cortexhugo: It is probably because the email address in latest changelog entry (debian/changelog) is not yours. | 15:15 |
| sistpoty|work | -us -uc takes care of that | 15:16 |
| slytherin | sistpoty|work: I wasn't sure he used those options. | 15:17 |
| slytherin | sistpoty|work: By the way, do I have to chase motu-release team members for jav-gnome FFe or will it get reviewed eventually? | 15:18 |
| slytherin | sistpoty|work: The reason I ask is because I am blocked in Debian for next upload. I want to make sure all the build problems are solved in one go. | 15:18 |
| ScottK | sistpoty|work: Would you please ack the clutter FFe, so that can get started. | 15:19 |
| ScottK | slytherin: What bug? | 15:19 |
| sistpoty|work | slytherin: it's on the worklist. of course pinging can speed the process up somewhat :P | 15:19 |
| sistpoty|work | ScottK: *looking* | 15:19 |
| slytherin | ScottK: bug #427463 | 15:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 427463 in java-gnome "FFe: Sync java-gnome 4.0.13-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427463 | 15:20 |
| sebner | sistpoty|work: bah, still no nexuiz :\ | 15:22 |
| ScottK | slytherin: Approved. | 15:22 |
| slytherin | ScottK: Thanks. | 15:22 |
| slytherin | ScottK: should I subscribe archive team? | 15:26 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 15:26 |
| sistpoty|work | ScottK: approved | 15:29 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 15:29 |
| ScottK | It seems like we're doing pretty well this cycle to get everything in a consistent state. | 15:30 |
| sistpoty|work | ftbfs worries me a bit though | 15:32 |
| slytherin | ScottK: done | 15:33 |
| ScottK | sistpoty|work: I agree. It worries me too. | 15:33 |
| ScottK | sistpoty|work: Want to do another FTBFS session? | 15:33 |
| ScottK | This time actually announce it .... | 15:33 |
| sistpoty|work | ScottK: hm... sounds like a good idea, though I won't find time until this Friday | 15:34 |
| ScottK | Friday is probably good. | 15:39 |
| ScottK | You should announce it today and do it Friday | 15:40 |
| sistpoty|work | ok, will do | 15:41 |
| RainCT | OT: Before I buy it, anyone has an EeePC 1005HA? | 15:53 |
| adolfon5 | hello | 16:03 |
| adolfon5 | good morning | 16:03 |
| adolfon5 | some help plz | 16:03 |
| adolfon5 | anyone? | 16:03 |
| adolfon5 | i have a problem with Ubuntu edition | 16:03 |
| adolfon5 | Ubuntu Desktop 9.04 | 16:04 |
| adolfon5 | anyone here know something about linux softwares? | 16:04 |
| pochu | ask in #ubuntu | 16:04 |
| adolfon5 | how can i do that? | 16:04 |
| pochu | go to the #ubuntu channel, and ask there | 16:04 |
| adolfon5 | thanks | 16:05 |
| kees | happyaron: hello! (i'm not the maintainer of kde-gettext, but perhaps I can help anyway?) | 16:13 |
| happyaron | kees: how can we have that da.po update upstream? | 16:15 |
| kees | happyaron: I would recommend opening an upstream bug report? | 16:15 |
| happyaron | kees: that would be fine, but I haven't found a upstream link, :( | 16:16 |
| ScottK | happyaron: dpm is the Ubuntu translations coordinator. He may have an idea about that. | 16:16 |
| happyaron | scottK, hi, I am just on that team and find a problem for this file in the import queue, :) | 16:17 |
| kees | happyaron: debian/copyright shows a KDE ftp url, so probably via the KDE bug tracker. | 16:17 |
| kees | happyaron: I would start with an Ubuntu bug first, so we can get it fixed in Ubuntu's package, then try to get it upstreamed. | 16:17 |
| ScottK | happyaron: I'd ask in #kubuntu-devel then as some people there know a bit about this stuff. | 16:17 |
| happyaron | kees: I have uploaded a fixed one to the queue, that's fine | 16:18 |
| happyaron | kees: I'll go to find upstream tracker | 16:18 |
| kees | okay, cool | 16:18 |
| happyaron | ScottK thanks | 16:19 |
| dpm | happyaron: I'd also go for ScottK's suggestion: asking at #kubuntu-devel | 16:19 |
| happyaron | dpm: okay, will go now | 16:19 |
| dpm | happyaron: and thanks for your rocking work in helping with translations! :-) | 16:19 |
| happyaron | dpm: my pleasure | 16:20 |
| happyaron | kees: the template is not in KDE l10n repository, I think | 16:25 |
| ScottK | james_w: I'm working with someone who's using Debian Testing and the version of bzr-builddeb he has appears seriously ancient. Would you have a recommendation what version would be best to use with bzr 1.17? | 16:25 |
| kees | happyaron: ah-ha, well, then, just an Ubuntu bug then. | 16:26 |
| james_w | ScottK: anything later should be fine | 16:26 |
| james_w | I should get an upload to Debian | 16:26 |
| ScottK | james_w: Thanks. | 16:26 |
| happyaron | kees: guys in kubuntu-devel said the package is not used anymore, and only for kde3 | 16:31 |
| happyaron | kees: so I think only a ubuntu bug filed is acceptable perhaps | 16:32 |
| kees | happyaron: okay | 16:32 |
| superm1 | kees, what were you trying to break in mythbuntu and xubuntu yesterday? | 16:35 |
| kees | superm1: oh, nothing at all. I was just saying that when freezes happen, I don't upload even to universe for fear of hitting a package in one of the isos | 16:38 |
| superm1 | kees, oh okay :P | 16:39 |
| adolfon | hello again | 16:47 |
| sistpoty|work | slangasek: would you be available this Fri at 19.00 UTC for another FTBFS session? | 16:55 |
| sebner | sistpoty|work: yeah, another session. /me is keen to follow :D | 16:56 |
| sistpoty|work | heh | 16:57 |
| ScottK | Note to sponsors, there are, IIRC, FTBFS fixes waiting for sponsorship. Quick turnaround on these will motivate people to do more. | 16:58 |
| slangasek | sistpoty|work: I'm off work this Friday, family in town | 16:58 |
| sistpoty|work | ah, ok, thanks slangasek | 16:59 |
| quadrispro | hi guys | 17:07 |
| sistpoty|work | hi quadrispro | 17:09 |
| quadrispro | hi sistpoty|work | 17:09 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| quadrispro | stgraber: I've released this https://launchpad.net/nautilus-pastebin, that extension and pastebinit does almost the same, I thought you might be interested in merging some code | 17:24 |
| RoAkSoAx | hey guys , I'm preparing a security update for nginx, and I have a question regarding the versioning. If the version is 0.6.34-2ubuntu1~hardy1, should the security update be: 0.6.34-2ubuntu1~hardy1.1 or 0.6.34-2ubuntu1.1~hardy1? | 17:24 |
| quadrispro | I think it should be ~hardy1.1 | 17:25 |
| jdstrand | RoAkSoAx: please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging | 17:26 |
| RoAkSoAx | k thanks quadrispro :) | 17:26 |
| RoAkSoAx | jdstrand, yes I'm there but it does not say what to do with versioning when we have ~hardy, ~intrepid, etc | 17:26 |
| jdstrand | RoAkSoAx: ok. please use ~hardy1.1 | 17:27 |
| RoAkSoAx | jdstrand, thanks ;) | 17:27 |
| jdstrand | RoAkSoAx: thank you! just make sure you mark the status as 'In Progress' so the debdiffs show up in our reporting | 17:28 |
| * sistpoty|work heads home... cya | 17:28 | |
| RoAkSoAx | jdstrand, bug #430064 :) | 17:29 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 430064 in nginx "Security fix in recent release 0.6.39/DSA-1884-1" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/430064 | 17:29 |
| jdstrand | kees: fyi ^ | 17:31 |
| kees | woo, yes, I'll snag that | 17:31 |
| === jetienne_ is now known as jetienne | ||
| jdstrand | (he's on community this week) | 17:31 |
| kees | RoAkSoAx: that version is for backports... | 17:33 |
| kees | RoAkSoAx: current stable releases show: | 17:33 |
| kees | nginx | 0.5.33-1 | hardy/universe | 17:33 |
| kees | nginx | 0.6.32-3ubuntu1 | intrepid/universe | 17:33 |
| kees | nginx | 0.6.35-0ubuntu1 | jaunty/universe | 17:33 |
| kees | but, for doing a backport patch, yes, append .1 | 17:34 |
| RoAkSoAx | kees, so I should apply the security fix for both the stable release and the backport? | 17:35 |
| kees | RoAkSoAx: that would be ideal, yes :) | 17:37 |
| imexil | Hi, I'm wondering about the package name "liblua5.1-0-dev" wich is simply the dev package of lua version 5.1 but what does the -0 bit tell me | 17:37 |
| RoAkSoAx | kees, ok, will do then :) | 17:37 |
| kees | RoAkSoAx: thanks! let me know if I can help. | 17:38 |
| RoAkSoAx | kees, will do :) thanks! | 17:39 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: Ideally for backports, we'd just do an updated backport of the fixed version rather than prepare a separate upload for backports. | 17:42 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, ok, so backport it is. :) | 17:47 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: Feel free to ping me when you are ready to have the backport approved. | 17:47 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, ok will do thanks! In this case should I update the package to the new upstream version which has the security fix (i.e. from 0.6.34-2ubuntu1~intrepid1 to 0.6.39-0ubunut1 ?) or should I just apply the security fix? | 17:51 |
| ScottK | I'd rather update to the new upstream and rebackport, but it'll need a bit of testing first. | 17:51 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, ok, I'll try to find the best solution for this then. | 17:55 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: The testing standard for backports is, "builds, installs, runs". It's not very hard to achieve. | 17:56 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, yep, I'll update the packages and test them | 17:57 |
| ximion | geser: Hi! Are you there? | 18:11 |
| geser | ximion: yes | 18:15 |
| ximion | geser: Great! Do you remember my packaging of libqt4intf? ( http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libqtintf4 ) | 18:16 |
| geser | yes | 18:17 |
| ximion | The problem with this library was that is was not versioned, so I contacted upstream and asked if they could fix it. After a discussion how to name the new lib they released a new version which is now versioned and fixed some other small issues to make the packaging easier. | 18:18 |
| ximion | So, could you please take a short look on the modifications? (There are no more lintian errors now) If something else is needed, I submit it to upstream. (If you dont's have time, no problem.) | 18:19 |
| geser | not right now, perhaps later | 18:20 |
| ximion | geser: okay. :-) | 18:21 |
| desrt | hello. does anyone know how to pass additional ./configure arguments when using debhelper with the 'tiny' rules file? | 18:47 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, Should I update only the version in karmic (from 0.6.35-0ubuntu1 to 0.6.39-0ubuntu1~jaunty) and then change the changelog entries for hardy and intrepid, or should I upgrade the versions in intrepid and hardy backports, which differ from jaunty (i.e. from 0.6.34-2ubuntu1~intrepid1 to 0.6.39), so that the we can keep the changelog entry from the previous backports? | 18:49 |
| ScottK | Don't worry about keeping the previous backports changelogs | 18:50 |
| RoAkSoAx | ok thanks :) | 18:51 |
| loic-m | Could anyone with backports rights have a look at Bug #333651 ? It's been marked confirmed and reported to work for a while, but still not gone through. | 18:55 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 333651 in jaunty-backports "Please backport s3cmd 0.9.9 to Jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/333651 | 18:55 |
| james_w | desrt: override_dh_auto_configure:\n\t./configure --what-not | 19:02 |
| desrt | fascinating. | 19:02 |
| james_w | there's no variables for "append this option" or anything | 19:03 |
| desrt | that's a shame | 19:03 |
| desrt | i guess i can look at the config.log to find out what the 'default' list is | 19:03 |
| desrt | ouch. that's a big list. | 19:04 |
| james_w | oh, no, easier way | 19:04 |
| desrt | some build-in variable for the standard options? | 19:04 |
| ScottK | loic-m: Done. | 19:04 |
| james_w | override_dh_auto_configure:\n\tdh_auto_configure -- --what-not | 19:05 |
| james_w | see dh_auto_configure(1) | 19:05 |
| desrt | oh yes. that's quite a lot better, i agree :) | 19:05 |
| loic-m | thanks a lot ScottK | 19:05 |
| desrt | james_w: thanks for the tip | 19:05 |
| james_w | np | 19:05 |
| desrt | ugh. some evil unescaping is going down here. | 19:06 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, sorry to bother you again but I have one more doubt. nginx in Karmic is 0.7.61-1ubuntu1, and nginx in Jaunty is 0.6.35-0ubuntu1. According to the documentation we can only backport packages that are already on the repositories. So will this mean that I *cant* update package in nginx, and then backport it to hardy and intrepid right? | 19:14 |
| RoAkSoAx | I mean *cant* update package in Jaunty to 0.6.39-0ubuntu1, and then backport it to hardy and intrepid? | 19:15 |
| ScottK | Sure you can. | 19:15 |
| ScottK | The docs aren't very clear on that and you need to be clear in the backport bug what you want. | 19:15 |
| ScottK | The docs really mean to say it has to be a backport for the Ubuntu archive, not from some external place. | 19:16 |
| RoAkSoAx | Oh ok, they got me confused on it. Anyways, I already have the packages so I guess I;ll setup my test environments :) | 19:17 |
| === cprov is now known as cprov-afk | ||
| desrt | does anyone know how to do separate libfoo/libfoo-dbg packages with dh rules.tiny? | 20:21 |
| * desrt tries the obvious thing | 20:27 | |
| desrt | and it works. | 20:31 |
| pochu | desrt: what is it? | 20:50 |
| RoAkSoAx | Hey guys, I was wondering, do we still need to care about providing fixes for sparc (since Ubuntu no longer provides releases for it)? | 20:55 |
| === sbasuita_ is now known as sbasuita | ||
| soren | RoAkSoAx: "need" is such a strong word :) | 21:00 |
| RoAkSoAx | soren, haha well for exmaple, debian provides a fix for building a package on sparc, thus, in Ubuntu we don't longer provide a release for sparc, so that fix would not help us, right? | 21:01 |
| soren | We haven't dropped sparc. | 21:02 |
| RoAkSoAx | I'm asking this because I'f there's no need for that fix, I can just apply a patch in the Ubuntu package instead of merging it from debian | 21:02 |
| soren | It's just not a supported architecture anymore. Like powerpc, for instance. | 21:02 |
| desrt | pochu: http://pastebin.ca/1568757 | 21:03 |
| desrt | pochu: override_dh_strip: | 21:03 |
| RoAkSoAx | soren, right, since it's not supported anymore, should I still need to care on fixing bugs related to that architecture? | 21:05 |
| soren | 20:00:22 < soren> RoAkSoAx: "need" is such a strong word :) | 21:05 |
| RoAkSoAx | soren, so we don't :), we could but we don't have to :) | 21:06 |
| zul_ | its like a hobby arch | 21:09 |
| RoAkSoAx | zul_, ok :) | 21:10 |
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| === zul_ is now known as zul | ||
| desrt | PPA builders have a bit of a backlog... | 21:46 |
| james_w | most of it is scored very low though | 21:49 |
| james_w | it's a test rebuild of the archive | 21:49 |
| james_w | but just about anything else jumps ahead of that in the queue | 21:49 |
| * desrt is waiting 2 hours | 21:49 | |
| james_w | though there may be a bit of a backlog independent of that | 21:49 |
| james_w | and the estimated wait times are a little untrustworthy :-) | 21:50 |
| * desrt does a pbuilder | 21:51 | |
| desrt | Release version: karmic-alpha-6 | 21:56 |
| desrt | Release code name: | 21:56 |
| desrt | Expected: in 3 hours | 21:56 |
| desrt | oh. i see. | 21:56 |
| zooko | Could I interest anyone in uploading Tahoe-LAFS into Karmic? | 21:59 |
| zooko | It is all reviewed and approved and all of its dependencies are in. | 21:59 |
| zooko | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/tahoe-lafs | 22:00 |
| zooko | And Tahoe-LAFS was featured in Ubuntu Podcast, so it would be nice if people could actually test it out in Karmic. :-) | 22:03 |
| zooko | Here is the Feature Freeze exception showing why Tahoe-LAFS is sufficiently cool that it belongs in Karmic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/421802 | 22:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 421802 in ubuntu "Feature Freeze Exception: Tahoe-LAFS" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 22:12 |
| debfx_ | siretart: could you please update the Debian keepassx package to 0.4.1, so it can be synced to karmic? | 22:24 |
| === debfx_ is now known as debfx | ||
| ahe | i just uploaded a package to my ppa that builds fine with debuild and pbuilder but the build server fails with this error message: | 23:03 |
| ahe | dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory | 23:03 |
| ahe | dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-genchanges gave error exit status 2 | 23:03 |
| ahe | any ideas what the problem could be? | 23:04 |
| soren | Do you have a link to the build log? | 23:09 |
| === k0p_ is now known as k0p | ||
| ahe | soren: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31923435/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.libnotify-ruby_0.3.3-0ubuntu1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 23:27 |
| mruiz | how should I modify debian/rules to adopt quilt as patch system ? | 23:33 |
| === santiago-pgsql is now known as Guest59121 | ||
| zooko | ScottK: I've already asked iulian, rainct, and kirkland about this, but none of them have been available to clue me in. | 23:40 |
| zooko | ScottK: is there anything I can do to push Tahoe-LAFS into Karmic sooner? | 23:40 |
| kirkland | zooko: i'm totally heads down on virt/cloud stuff, no time for anything else | 23:40 |
| zooko | As far as I know everything is lined up and ready to go -- we just need somebody to upload it. | 23:41 |
| kirkland | zooko: sorry, i know your fs is cloud-related too | 23:41 |
| zooko | kirkland: I appreciate that. I'm glad Karmic is going to have good virt/cloud stuff. :-) | 23:41 |
| kirkland | zooko: i mean on particular, assigned tasks; i'm having trouble fitting anything else in | 23:41 |
| zooko | I don't want to be a pest, but if there's anything I can do to get Tahoe-LAFS into Karmic sooner, then I can ask folks to test it and make sure it is solid when Karmic goes gold. | 23:41 |
| zooko | kirkland: yes, I understood. I'll leave you alone until further notice. :-) | 23:42 |
| kirkland | zooko: i'm really, really sorry | 23:43 |
| kirkland | zooko: i like what i've seen so far, though, fwiw | 23:43 |
| zooko | Thanks for the encouragement! Good luck with your cloud work! | 23:44 |
| ScottK | zooko: A lot of people are tied up with getting ready for Alpha 6. Subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors and be patient. | 23:44 |
| ScottK | Did the python package (I don't recall the name) build this time? | 23:44 |
| zooko | ScottK: will do. Tahoe-LAFS depends on three Python packages that are all three in Karmic now. | 23:45 |
| ScottK | The crytoppp one (or something like that) is the one I was thinking of | 23:45 |
| zooko | It is in Karmic now. | 23:46 |
| zooko | http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=pycryptopp&searchon=names&suite=karmic§ion=all | 23:46 |
| ahe | soren: did you find something? | 23:48 |
| ahe | soren: strange thing is the build for i386 succeeded | 23:48 |
| ahe | soren: https://launchpad.net/~aheck/+archive/ppa | 23:49 |
| ahe | i tested it on amd64 and it fails on all but i386 | 23:49 |
| zooko | Okay time to take my 5 year old boy to see "Up". :-) If anybody has questions about Tahoe-LAFS, see channel #tahoe on freenode. | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!