| === bjf is now known as bjf-afk | ||
| siji | how to create *kernel.jffs2 | 09:39 |
|---|---|---|
| lool | I have no idea what that is | 09:44 |
| siji | lool, am tryng to put both kernel and rootfs inside the nand memory | 09:48 |
| siji | And i think nand memory will support only jffs2 file system | 09:49 |
| siji | so need to convert both kerenl and rootfs to .jffs2 format | 09:50 |
| lool | siji: What board is this on? | 09:51 |
| siji | Compulab,CMX 300 | 09:51 |
| lool | What SoC is that? | 09:52 |
| siji | Soc means ?? | 09:52 |
| siji | chip? | 09:52 |
| lool | Yes | 09:52 |
| siji | marvel pxa 300 | 09:52 |
| lool | siji: that's v5 right? | 10:04 |
| lool | siji: Only jaunty supports that | 10:04 |
| lool | siji: What bootloader does it use? | 10:04 |
| siji | it's using compulab's customised u boot | 10:10 |
| lool | siji: So I understand you can either partition the flash space to have a kernel and a rootfs zone and load them from there or you can put the kernel in the rootfs and tell uboot to load it from there (kernel in rootfs in flash) | 11:09 |
| lool | siji: Did you look in the two options? | 11:09 |
| siji | lool, yes | 11:09 |
| siji | it's taking the rootfs too | 11:10 |
| ogra | lool, do you have any idea about http://paste.ubuntu.com/273349/ ? | 11:10 |
| ogra | Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-100-imx51 | 11:10 |
| ogra | Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: readlink: missing operand | 11:10 |
| ogra | Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: Try `readlink --help' for more information. | 11:10 |
| ogra | Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: mkinitramfs: missing root /sys entry | 11:10 |
| ogra | Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most | 11:10 |
| ogra | Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug | 11:10 |
| lool | siji: Sorry can't parse what you said | 11:10 |
| ogra | if [ -L /initrd.img -a -e /initrd.img ]; then | 11:10 |
| ogra | linktarget="$(basename "$(readlink /initrd.img)")" | 11:10 |
| ogra | fi | 11:10 |
| ogra | if [ -L /boot/initrd.img -a -e /boot/initrd.img ]; then | 11:10 |
| ogra | linktarget="$(basename "$(readlink /boot/initrd.img)")" | 11:10 |
| ogra | fi | 11:10 |
| ogra | neither of the initrd.img files exist | 11:11 |
| siji | lool,it's giving error kernel panic | 11:11 |
| ogra | the if statement is never fulfilled | 11:11 |
| ogra | but still update-initramfs calls readlink | 11:11 |
| lool | siji: So your kernel gets loaded then | 11:12 |
| siji | yes | 11:12 |
| lool | ogra: Are you sure it's failing on that spot? | 11:14 |
| lool | ogra: Can you run in-target update-initramfs -c manually with set -x? | 11:14 |
| ogra | no, just moved forward and i see outfile="$(readlink -f "$outfile")" | 11:14 |
| ogra | in mkinitramfs | 11:15 |
| lool | There are more uses of readlink in update-initramfs than the one you quoted and the one you quoted seem sufficiently protected that they wouldn't fail | 11:15 |
| ogra | and i think i fell for a red herring anyway | 11:15 |
| ogra | <ogra> Sep 17 17:59:48 in-target: mkinitramfs: missing root /sys entry | 11:15 |
| ogra | that must be the actual error | 11:15 |
| lool | siji: So your issue is perhaps with your root= cmdline? | 11:15 |
| siji | can u just give me the cmd line | 11:16 |
| lool | ogra: Yes | 11:16 |
| siji | to boot frm nand | 11:16 |
| lool | ogra: hook-functions has for instnace sys_walk_mod_add which looks like it would fail if /sys isn't mounted | 11:16 |
| ogra | if [ -z "${block}" ] || [ ! -e /sys/block/${block} ]; then | 11:17 |
| ogra | echo "mkinitramfs: missing ${block} root ${root} /sys entry" | 11:17 |
| ogra | crap so d-i (or rather base-installer) didnt mount sys | 11:17 |
| lool | ogra: well that error is afterwards | 11:17 |
| lool | ogra: Run with -x | 11:17 |
| lool | siji: I'm not sure | 11:18 |
| lool | siji: What's your kernel version? I think it's something likeroot=jffs2/rootfs or something | 11:18 |
| ogra | lool, well, /sys isnt mounted in /target | 11:18 |
| ogra | so update-initramfs cant find out which modules it needs | 11:18 |
| lool | siji: http://www.denx.de/wiki/DULG/RootFileSystemOnAJFFS2FileSystem | 11:18 |
| lool | ogra: Did you verify that was the issue or is it an hypothesis? | 11:19 |
| ogra | lool, i see that /sys isnt mounted | 11:19 |
| ogra | i'm still in the d-i shell directly after the failure | 11:19 |
| ogra | ~ # mount | 11:19 |
| ogra | rootfs on / type rootfs (rw) | 11:19 |
| ogra | none on /proc type proc (rw,relatime) | 11:19 |
| ogra | none on /sys type sysfs (rw,relatime) | 11:19 |
| ogra | tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw,relatime) | 11:19 |
| ogra | devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000) | 11:20 |
| ogra | /dev/sda1 on /target type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered) | 11:20 |
| ogra | /dev/sda1 on /dev/.static/dev type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered) | 11:20 |
| siji | lool,yes the kernel is in jffs2 format | 11:20 |
| ogra | tmpfs on /target/dev type tmpfs (rw,relatime) | 11:20 |
| lool | ogra: That might be the issue; I wonder if it's a recent change and whether it affects other arches | 11:21 |
| ogra | lool, i doubt that, its the A6 candidate image | 11:21 |
| ogra | that would have shown up during testing on other arches | 11:21 |
| lool | ogra: I dont see the architecture specific issue though | 11:22 |
| ogra | me neither but clearly neither /proc nor /sys are actually mounted | 11:22 |
| ogra | which is the cause for the error i see | 11:23 |
| lool | ogra: So you verified it's enough to mount /sys to fix the install? | 11:25 |
| ogra | to bad i'm on serial, else i could repeat the whole thing and watch it from a second console | 11:25 |
| ogra | no, i cant easily do that | 11:25 |
| ogra | if i start over now, it will reformat /target and start over with a base install | 11:26 |
| ogra | and i dont have a second console to manually mount /sys | 11:26 |
| lool | ogra: You could go to target, dpkg -C and see if mounting /sys resolves it | 11:26 |
| ogra | -C ? | 11:28 |
| ogra | you mean --configure -a | 11:28 |
| * ogra tries so ... i didnt touch /target yet to not taint the status of it | 11:28 | |
| ogra | its hard to get to the same point again (having to copy around firmware and modules for the netinstall to even work) | 11:29 |
| lool | ogra: Perhaps it would be best to defer until next debian-installer upload? | 11:29 |
| ogra | # dpkg --configure -a | 11:30 |
| ogra | Setting up linux-image-2.6.31-100-imx51 (2.6.31-100.7) ... | 11:30 |
| ogra | Running depmod. | 11:30 |
| ogra | update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-100-imx51 | 11:30 |
| ogra | readlink: missing operand | 11:30 |
| ogra | Try `readlink --help' for more information. | 11:30 |
| ogra | mkinitramfs: missing root /sys entry | 11:30 |
| ogra | mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most | 11:30 |
| ogra | mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug | 11:30 |
| ogra | update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-100-imx51 | 11:30 |
| ogra | Failed to create initrd image. | 11:30 |
| ogra | :/ | 11:30 |
| ogra | sys is mounted | 11:30 |
| ogra | and i can list /sys/block | 11:30 |
| ogra | hrm | 11:30 |
| ogra | err | 11:30 |
| lool | Wasn't that obvious that it was /sys ;-) | 11:31 |
| lool | ogra: How about you set -x ? | 11:31 |
| ogra | one sec | 11:32 |
| ogra | there are supposed to be filled variables before root and after /sys in "missing root /sys entry" | 11:32 |
| lool | How about you set -x ? | 11:33 |
| lool | :-P | 11:33 |
| ogra | http://paste.ubuntu.com/273378/ ... | 11:37 |
| * ogra tries in mkinitramfs | 11:37 | |
| lool | ogra: in mkinitramfs | 11:37 |
| lool | right | 11:37 |
| ogra | http://paste.ubuntu.com/273380/ | 11:38 |
| ogra | # ls /dev/root | 11:39 |
| ogra | ls: cannot access /dev/root: No such file or directory | 11:39 |
| ogra | aha | 11:39 |
| siji | hey lool, | 11:40 |
| siji | mtd0: 00040000 00020000 "OBM" | 11:40 |
| siji | mtd1: 00040000 00020000 "U-Boot" | 11:40 |
| siji | mtd2: 00040000 00020000 "Environment" | 11:40 |
| siji | mtd3: 00140000 00020000 "reserved" | 11:40 |
| siji | mtd4: 00400000 00020000 "kernel" | 11:40 |
| siji | mtd5: 1fa00000 00020000 "fs" | 11:40 |
| siji | this is the nand partition table | 11:40 |
| ogra | must be somewhere between line 218 and 226 | 11:41 |
| ogra | hmm, it uses the output from "mount" | 11:42 |
| ogra | which is empty | 11:42 |
| ogra | (well empty beyond sys and proc) | 11:42 |
| lool | ogra: $(mount | awk '/\/dev\// {if ($3 == "/") {print "root=" $1 "\nFSTYPE=" $5; exit}}') | 11:42 |
| ogra | yeah | 11:43 |
| lool | siji: Read that wiki page I mentionned? | 11:43 |
| siji | ok | 11:43 |
| siji | oh,it was for me :) | 11:43 |
| ogra | # mount | 11:43 |
| ogra | proc on /proc type proc (rw) | 11:43 |
| ogra | sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) | 11:43 |
| lool | ogra: see dep_add_modules() in hook-functions | 11:43 |
| siji | i thought that it's for ogra :) | 11:43 |
| lool | ogra: so where are you installing to? | 11:43 |
| ogra | /dev/sda1 | 11:44 |
| siji | srry | 11:44 |
| lool | ogra: can you compare with /proc/mounts? | 11:44 |
| ogra | USB key | 11:44 |
| ogra | # mount | 11:44 |
| ogra | sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) | 11:44 |
| ogra | proc on /proc type proc (rw) | 11:44 |
| ogra | # cat /proc/mounts | 11:44 |
| ogra | rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 | 11:44 |
| ogra | none /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 | 11:44 |
| ogra | none /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 | 11:44 |
| ogra | tmpfs /dev tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0 | 11:44 |
| ogra | devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 | 11:45 |
| ogra | /dev/sda1 / ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 | 11:45 |
| ogra | /dev/sda1 /dev/.static/dev ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 | 11:45 |
| ogra | tmpfs /dev tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0 | 11:45 |
| ogra | proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 | 11:45 |
| lool | ogra: So your mtab isn't matching /proc/mounts; that code would work with /proc/mounts | 11:45 |
| lool | ogra: Now this has no reason of being architecture specific | 11:45 |
| ogra | right | 11:45 |
| lool | ogra: Is /etc/mtab different outside the target? | 11:45 |
| ogra | unles mount has a bug | 11:45 |
| ogra | mtab is identical to /proc/mounts outside target | 11:46 |
| ogra | and ot the mount output inside | 11:46 |
| lool | So this actually looks like an installer bug but I cant figure why it's only hitting us | 11:47 |
| ogra | i initially starte because my /vmlinuz symlink isnt created | 11:47 |
| lool | ? | 11:47 |
| ogra | and i think i heard NCommander say something like that a wek ago | 11:47 |
| lool | I dont get what you mwan | 11:47 |
| ogra | i saw the readlink error | 11:48 |
| ogra | and started debugging the kernel postinst, since i was suspecting the missing /vmlinuz and /initrd.img to be at fault | 11:48 |
| ogra | then moved forward to update-initramfs | 11:48 |
| ogra | to then get to mkinitramfs and the missing /sys ... | 11:49 |
| ogra | which now got me to the hooks | 11:49 |
| ogra | the point is that the obvious thing seems to be the missing symlinks | 11:49 |
| lool | Oh ok if you sya so | 11:49 |
| ogra | thats the error on the surface ... | 11:49 |
| ogra | and thats what NCommander dug in a week or two ago in his manually spun dove images | 11:50 |
| ogra | crawling through all of d-i if i understood that right, to find why his symlinks were missing | 11:50 |
| ogra | so it seems to happen on dove as well | 11:51 |
| lool | lunch | 11:55 |
| === cbrake_away is now known as cbrake | ||
| Stskeeps | hmm, is there a typical ubuntu rootfs tar.gz laying about that just uses fbdev? | 12:16 |
| lool | Stskeeps: I dont think we publish any regularly; we only build d-i images regularly; but you could easily build your own with rootstock | 12:43 |
| lool | It might be a bit borken since some days due to upstart | 12:43 |
| Stskeeps | k | 12:43 |
| lool | ogra: 427199 isn't on the report but is milestoned | 13:48 |
| lool | (from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.milestone=12715 ) | 13:48 |
| ogra | ah, thanks, missed that one+ | 13:49 |
| ogra | lool, thats all ? | 13:52 |
| lool | ogra: You can say "UNR theme" for the title of 430277 | 13:52 |
| ogra | plars, can i strike mobile-unr-karmic-compliance-autotesting from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/ReleaseStatus/Karmic ? | 13:53 |
| lool | ogra: I'm slow because I'm chatting with telepathy people too | 13:53 |
| ogra | yep | 13:53 |
| ogra | saw that in the other chan. | 13:53 |
| lool | ogra: 430344 isn't on the report either | 13:53 |
| lool | but is on the milestoned bugs list | 13:53 |
| lool | ogra: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/423346 | 13:57 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 423346 in usplash "[armel+dove] usplash does not currently work on Marvell Dove Y0 boards" [High,New] | 13:57 |
| lool | ogra: NCommander forgot to track in karmic... | 13:57 |
| ogra | ok | 13:57 |
| lool | NCommander: It's really CRUCIAL that you get that right | 13:57 |
| ogra | lool, do we really belive its still worth to track banshee ? | 14:02 |
| * ogra thinks that can be dropped from the report | 14:02 | |
| ogra | while it's nice to have and i still hope dyfet finds the issue its really not release critical or even intresting for the release meeting | 14:03 |
| ogra | lool, wrt bug 424400 it might also be firmware thats missing ... though only GrueMaster can actually debug and confirm | 14:07 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 424400 in linux-fsl-imx51 "DM9601 or Pegasus based USB NICs dont find their MAC address under 2.6.31-100-imx51" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424400 | 14:07 |
| lool | ogra: That's an idea | 14:07 |
| ogra | [ubuntu/karmic] linux-fsl-imx51 2.6.31-101.8 (Accepted) | 14:07 |
| * ogra dances !!! | 14:08 | |
| ogra | my second kernel this release cycle, yay ! | 14:08 |
| ogra | hmm, based on rc8 | 14:08 |
| ogra | what made me think i get something based on final :P | 14:08 |
| siji | hey how to get the terminal/login window in both lcd and minicom | 14:09 |
| plars | ogra: I marked it complete | 14:10 |
| ogra | plars, so i can drop it, right ? | 14:10 |
| plars | ogra: yeah | 14:10 |
| ogra | (i saw its marked implemented, but its still on the release team report) | 14:10 |
| ogra | cool | 14:10 |
| ogra | * ARM: IMX51: ENGR00103310 Initial imx_nfc NAND Flash MTD driver | 14:12 |
| ogra | lool, ^^^^ | 14:12 |
| ogra | ! | 14:12 |
| ogra | * [Config] Run updateconfigs after rebasing to 2.6.31 final | 14:13 |
| ogra | ah | 14:13 |
| lool | ogra: Cool | 14:15 |
| ogra | ha, and i can drop at least one bug from the report again :) | 14:15 |
| ogra | Bug 359049 just closed itself | 14:15 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 359049 in linux-mvl-dove "imx51 udeb hardcodes linux version in vmlinuz binary name" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/359049 | 14:15 |
| lool | ogra: I usually keep the bugs which are mentionned on the email or reports and mention that they are closed on the mobile team report | 14:20 |
| ogra | what are you referring to ? banshee ? | 14:20 |
| lool | ogra: 422101 > removing the milestone? | 14:21 |
| lool | ogra: 15:15 < ogra> ha, and i can drop at least one bug from the report again :) | 14:21 |
| lool | ogra: I dont drop closed bugs | 14:21 |
| lool | I just mark them closed in the report | 14:21 |
| ogra | ah, k | 14:23 |
| * ogra sighs, i dropped them all already | 14:23 | |
| * ogra tries to find them again and re-adds | 14:23 | |
| lool | ogra: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425464 | 14:24 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 425464 in unr-meta "Favicon for site being bookmarked should be used as part of the icon in the Launcher" [Medium,Triaged] | 14:24 |
| lool | ogra: updating milestone | 14:25 |
| lool | ogra: *I* forgot to track https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unr-meta/+bug/425464 in karmic *sigh* | 14:27 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 425464 in unr-meta "Favicon for site being bookmarked should be used as part of the icon in the Launcher" [Medium,Triaged] | 14:27 |
| lool | Actually i recall killing the browser before launchpad loaded on this bug | 14:27 |
| lool | but well | 14:27 |
| ogra | added | 14:27 |
| lool | ogra: Hmm did you update the milestoned features?? | 14:28 |
| ogra | i removed them | 14:28 |
| ogra | they are all set to implemented | 14:28 |
| lool | ogra: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-qa-karmic-unr and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-qa-karmic-arm are milestoned | 14:28 |
| lool | ogra: I'm not sure you're looking at the correct data | 14:29 |
| lool | ogra: Goal is to a) move stuff from previous milestone to next milestone and b) comment on everything on the next milestone | 14:29 |
| lool | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-9.10-beta | 14:29 |
| lool | You can see two specs of plars there | 14:29 |
| ogra | well, i looked at the three specs that were left from last week in the report | 14:29 |
| lool | and the moblin remix one | 14:29 |
| ogra | all three were marked implemented | 14:30 |
| lool | ogra: The ones from last week were for A6 | 14:30 |
| lool | ogra: Now you need to also list stuff for next milestone | 14:30 |
| ogra | and marked implemented when i looked 1h ago | 14:30 |
| lool | ogra: the three specs for ubuntu-9.10-beta are not marked implemented no | 14:30 |
| ogra | no, the three that were on the report before are | 14:31 |
| lool | ogra: Actually there's even your spec on it | 14:31 |
| lool | ogra: Well that's good | 14:31 |
| ogra | wtf ... how can they show up if they are implementd | 14:31 |
| lool | ogra: If the specs we intended to be implemented in A6 were implemented then we can remove them from the report and not move the milestone on them; that's considered normal if you like | 14:31 |
| lool | ogra: I think there's a misunderstanding | 14:31 |
| ogra | right | 14:31 |
| ogra | i think there is a misconception in LP | 14:32 |
| lool | ogra: You need to drop everything from the report which was targetted at A6 and implemented | 14:32 |
| ogra | right, that i did | 14:32 |
| lool | ogra: You need to move everything which was targetted at A6 and was NOT implemented to ubuntu-9.10-beta | 14:32 |
| lool | ogra: And you need to report on everything which is targetted at ubuntu-9.10-beta | 14:32 |
| ogra | ok, i thought the spec owners do that | 14:32 |
| lool | ogra: The spec owners give you a one line summary in their blueprint which gets agregated in the burndown report | 14:33 |
| ogra | lool, how did you get any work done on fridays in the past | 14:33 |
| lool | ogra: It takes me about 1.5 hours to get the report written; I'm glad you see it's a lot of work :-) | 14:33 |
| ogra | thats eating half the day | 14:33 |
| lool | I didn't do much on fridays indeed | 14:33 |
| lool | ogra: That's also why I insist on getting this blueprint stuff in shape, the bugs properly milestoned and implemented the status in blueprints in the burndown chart | 14:34 |
| ogra | yeah, i understood that before even assembling this report :) | 14:35 |
| ogra | but i see how painful it is if they arent up to date | 14:35 |
| lool | ogra: So I think I walked on the A6 stuff; you can just check the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-9.10-beta stuff | 14:36 |
| lool | ogra: You want to mention status of the 4 specs | 14:36 |
| lool | ogra: And poke plars since his specs are Started only | 14:36 |
| lool | plars: ^ | 14:36 |
| lool | plars: What's the progress on the testcases specs? Should we say slow progress? Good progress now? | 14:36 |
| lool | plars: they are currently "Started" | 14:37 |
| lool | plars: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-qa-karmic-arm says you are bringing up your babbage board but that was a while ago | 14:37 |
| plars | lool: well | 14:41 |
| lool | ogra: So what I do is that I "union" bugs and blueprints from: A6 which need to be moved, beta, the ones mentionned in the report, the bug lists we review during our mobile irc meetings | 14:41 |
| plars | lool: I don't feel right about saying beta available | 14:42 |
| lool | ogra: I spotted one more blueprint in the agenda: UbuntuSpec:mobile-karmic-marvell-desktop; you might want to comment that it was implemented in A6 | 14:42 |
| ogra | ok | 14:42 |
| plars | lool: because I have the wiki testplan up, but not a bzr repo with the tests integrated at this point | 14:42 |
| lool | UbuntuSpec:mobile-unr-karmic-application-res also shows up not sure why | 14:42 |
| lool | plars: That's ok but inbetween we could say Slow progress or Good progress | 14:43 |
| plars | lool: I can change the status to something else if you'd like... what does it affect? | 14:43 |
| lool | plars: I see it like: Started, Slow progress, Good progress, Beta, Implementeed | 14:43 |
| ogra | lool, yeah, i was wondering what to do with app-res | 14:43 |
| lool | plars: It will allow answering the release team's concerns if they ask where we stand | 14:43 |
| lool | plars: Since "started" might worry them | 14:43 |
| plars | ok | 14:44 |
| ogra | make it good progress ;) | 14:44 |
| ogra | lool, think i can drop app-res ? | 14:44 |
| plars | I'll mark them both good progress, I've done more work on the unr one than the arm one, but a lot has gone into checkbox already (as expected) that benefits both of them | 14:46 |
| plars | I wanted to get my A6 one finished up also, which also benefits UNR in particular. Now that that's done, I'm going to be focused on these two | 14:47 |
| ogra | lool, any suggestion what to do with application resolution ? i'm not sure what to say about it or why its on the report at all | 14:50 |
| * ogra gets some more coffee | 14:53 | |
| lool | ogra: sorry had a phone call | 14:55 |
| lool | ogra: I recommend you keep app-res and I'll clear things with paulliu when it's daylight time for him | 14:56 |
| lool | ogra: I think the remaining bugs are upstream ones but still we need to update its state; sorry I didn't do that earlier this week | 14:56 |
| ogra | remaining bugs ? | 14:59 |
| ogra | so what do i write for app-res ? | 15:00 |
| lool | ogra: in the app res spec | 15:00 |
| ogra | ah | 15:00 |
| lool | ogra: That most bugs are upstream one and we will look at reducing its scope next week | 15:00 |
| ogra | well, i'm happy with a summary line to add to the report ... | 15:00 |
| ogra | ok | 15:00 |
| lool | ogra: you can take summary lines from http://piware.de/workitems/mobile/karmic/report.html when that's up-to-date | 15:00 |
| ogra | which it isnt :P | 15:01 |
| lool | Well the report is, the spec wasn't kept up-to-date | 15:01 |
| ogra | so https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/ReleaseStatus/Karmic looks ok to you now ? | 15:02 |
| lool | ogra: status for #423767 seems out of date | 15:03 |
| ogra | well, who is pushing to linux-firmware then ? | 15:04 |
| lool | ogra: It says "pending push from amitk but driver doesn't work and needs porting" | 15:04 |
| ogra | yeah, i looked at the bottom | 15:04 |
| ogra | its irritating that we have them twice | 15:04 |
| lool | I think it should say something like "Needs kernel love to add firmware from upstream" or smth | 15:04 |
| lool | ogra: agreed | 15:05 |
| * ogra moves description from the bottom one to the top one as well | 15:05 | |
| ogra | Dove squahfs's ... | 15:05 |
| ogra | hhe | 15:05 |
| * ogra fixes NCommanders typos i copy/pasted | 15:05 | |
| lool | ogra: 425547 > we're blocked on telepathy-mission-control-5 port of moblin stuff but I just clarified the plan with upstream | 15:06 |
| ogra | ok | 15:07 |
| lool | ogra: there's a typo in the bug number 427199 for dove squashfs | 15:08 |
| lool | in the report it says #27199 | 15:08 |
| ogra | fixed | 15:08 |
| lool | ogra: lool started testing on the ffmpeg bug if you like | 15:09 |
| lool | ogra: status of #420555 is out of date | 15:09 |
| lool | You might want to mention FSL is looking into it | 15:10 |
| ogra | i updated it though | 15:10 |
| lool | ogra: Ok that's all I had | 15:10 |
| ogra | might not be massively obvious, i just mangled your sentence | 15:11 |
| ogra | thanks, will add the changes | 15:11 |
| lool | ogra: Looking at general status stuff | 15:11 |
| lool | "inmportant" typo | 15:11 |
| lool | ogra: I would mention addition of installer support in dove and the oo.o issue in the sections at the bottom | 15:12 |
| lool | ogra: and moblin remix being blocked on the TMC 5 port | 15:12 |
| lool | ogra: Perhaps the ooo issue can go in armel general status | 15:12 |
| lool | ogra: As a reward I'll share something with you in some minutes | 15:15 |
| ogra | updated | 15:16 |
| lool | ogra: email sent | 15:18 |
| ogra | thanks :) | 15:18 |
| === bjf-afk is now known as bjf | ||
| GrueMaster | So, I heard my name, metaphorically speaking. | 16:10 |
| === Meiz__n810 is now known as Meiz_n810 | ||
| === cbrake is now known as cbrake_away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!