| giovani | jmarsden: unless ubuntu has changed recently -- sysfs.conf is used to change /sys values, while sysctl.conf is used to change /proc values -- this is a /sys value | 00:12 |
|---|---|---|
| jmarsden | giovani: OK, could be... sysctl.conf is the one that is always there on my systems, and which I have used, not sysfs.conf. When using sysfs.conf didn't seem to work for the OP, I thought maybe there was confusion over the filename. | 00:14 |
| giovani | nah, this is a /sys value, I'm 95% sure | 00:14 |
| Vashta_Nerada | .,.,.,.,. | 00:41 |
| uvirtbot | New bug: #430189 in apache2 (main) "Apache Php Segfault crti.S" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/430189 | 03:17 |
| android60 | is there a log file for transmission-daemon? | 04:33 |
| tpeden | I'm trying to run gvim or redcar from my ubuntu server over ssh to edit some files using X11 Forwarding, but I get this error: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". | 05:35 |
| jmarsden | tpeden: That should be harmless... see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-October/039134.html | 05:39 |
| tpeden | is anyone alive in here lol | 05:39 |
| tpeden | oh snap! | 05:39 |
| tpeden | It's slowing the app startup and the app itself WAY down | 05:40 |
| jmarsden | Odd, it's not supposed to matter. Maybe run a local editor and edit the files over sshfs? or use Emacs and use TRAMP to get at the files?? I don't know if vim has a remote file access setup like Emacs TRAMP... | 05:41 |
| tpeden | I mean, the apps do start, just takes like a minute (no exaggeration either) and then they are very slow at responding (and the server is on gbit network, sitting next to my dt) | 05:41 |
| tpeden | A friend of mine suggested using -YC | 05:42 |
| tpeden | but it didn't seem to help, plus I don't know what -Y is on PuTTY (when I'm in Windows) | 05:43 |
| giovani | tpeden: what makes you think the slowness is related to the warning? | 05:43 |
| tpeden | Well, I was doing this in 8.10 just fine, no errors and no slowness. I had to reinstall ubuntu (hardware upgrade) and I of course installed Jaunty and started getting this error and the slowness... tho I did study statistics so I am aware correlation does not prove causation... so they could very well be unrelated | 05:46 |
| jmarsden | tpeden: Your desktop is running Windows? With what X server? Can you upgrade that to a newer version, maybe?? | 05:49 |
| tpeden | Xming? | 05:50 |
| jmarsden | If you pay, the Xming guy will give you access to a newer version that the one he makes available free of charge... no idea if that would help, but | 05:51 |
| jmarsden | it might be worth a try? | 05:51 |
| tpeden | lol awesome! | 05:52 |
| vraa_ | does someone know how to set 3 of the 4 network interfaces to be "down" so my 'server' reboots without having to press ctrl+alt+del at the ubuntu boot up portion? | 07:33 |
| vraa_ | i think that's what i need to do | 07:33 |
| vraa_ | http://pastebin.com/m39bad4cc -- that is my /etc/network/interfaces | 07:33 |
| vraa_ | http://pastebin.com/m1a421cf9 -- and that's "sudo ifconfig -a" | 07:33 |
| === vraa_ is now known as vraa | ||
| uvirtbot | New bug: #433383 in samba (main) "package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/433383 | 07:50 |
| Vog | morning all... | 09:15 |
| Vog | Have a question about what the fastest method would be to send lost of small files over a fast network between 2 servers. Basically getting one home directory and moving it over to another machine maintaining the permissions. | 09:17 |
| Vog | ^^lots of | 09:17 |
| uvirtbot | Vog: Error: "^lots" is not a valid command. | 09:17 |
| maxb | I would tar | ssh othermachine untar | 09:17 |
| Vog | yeah I was thinking the same thing.... | 09:19 |
| Vog | somethign like tar -cf - /path/to/dir | ssh remote_server 'tar -xvf - -C /path/to/remotedir' | 09:19 |
| twb | The quotes are optional, and -f - is totally unnecessary. | 09:19 |
| twb | e.g. tar -C /etc -c ssh | ssh fs tar -C /etc -x | 09:20 |
| Vog | I'll give that a shot thx for the input... | 09:22 |
| twb | FWIW I do that regularly and it works fine. | 09:22 |
| twb | Though doing it over ssh is slow if you are on a trusted network | 09:22 |
| twb | ssh fs -f 'nc -l 12345 | tar -C /etc -x' && tar -C /etc -c ssh | nc fs 12345 | 09:23 |
| twb | ...something like that would do it unencrypted (untested). | 09:23 |
| Vog | ooo... good point\ | 09:24 |
| twb | You will also probably want to run tar as root on both ends, because only root can do some chown-type operations. And if you are dealing with heterogeneous chroots, --numeric-owner is vital. | 09:24 |
| twb | Finally, I can't vouch for whether it will preserve extended attributes or sockets. | 09:25 |
| Vog | I'll try this now and report the results so far it is progressing nicely. | 09:25 |
| twb | Oh, and if this is a local network, you might be able to tune NFSv3 to be faster. | 09:26 |
| twb | Out of the box, I think it'll be slower than tar + nc | 09:26 |
| Matty-uk | Is there an alternative keyserver that i can use instead of keyserver.ubuntu.com. I've googled it without success? | 10:32 |
| twb | Matty-uk: depends what keys you want. | 10:33 |
| twb | I have "keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net" in my .gnupg/gpg.conf, but that's probably old-school. | 10:33 |
| twb | I think MIT also has a reasonably centralized keyserver. | 10:33 |
| Matty-uk | Cheers MIT one worked | 10:38 |
| twb | What is the MIT one, btw? | 10:47 |
| Matty-uk | pgp.mit.edu | 10:54 |
| Vog | twb: I htink I had something wrong with my syntax. Copy was successful but it left out files with long filenames. | 10:55 |
| twb | Vog: hmm, are both hosts running Ubuntu? | 10:56 |
| twb | Matty-uk: thanks. | 10:56 |
| Vog | Yep | 10:56 |
| twb | Vog: dunno, then | 10:56 |
| twb | Vog: are both filesystems ext3? | 10:56 |
| Vog | Let me check one of the systems has been thgough a dist upgrade | 10:57 |
| Vog | yeah both ext3 | 10:57 |
| twb | Vog: did you capture stderr from both processes? Maybe they complained? | 10:58 |
| * Vog checking logs | 10:58 | |
| incorrect | apt-get install ubuntu-xen-server install everything i need for xen? | 12:34 |
| uvirtbot | New bug: #371612 in php5 (main) "[needs-packaging] php5-litespeed" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/371612 | 15:19 |
| android60 | besides df -h is there a way from command line to view disk usage | 15:23 |
| blak111 | du | 15:23 |
| android60 | ok | 15:24 |
| pipedream | df is quikc, du might take time and should be used with care on a busy fileserver | 15:29 |
| android60 | I have a problem then, I have 2 1TB drives, 1 part on each, sda1 = /media/MainStorage1 sdb1 = /media/ArchiveDisk1, when I do rsync with "rsync --progress -r --delete-before /media/MainStorage1/ /media/ArchiveDisk1" Archive disk shows 29GB more is used than MainStorage1 on completion. I have checked samba etc, and I only see the exact same files. | 15:31 |
| RoyK | ionice du, perhaps | 15:31 |
| RoyK | android60: what filesystem(s)? | 15:32 |
| android60 | RoyK: both are XFS | 15:32 |
| RoyK | k | 15:32 |
| RoyK | hm | 15:32 |
| RoyK | try -avP | 15:33 |
| RoyK | -a == archive | 15:33 |
| RoyK | man rsync | 15:33 |
| RoyK | I won't think it'll make much difference, though | 15:33 |
| * RoyK uses opensolaris/zfs for that sort of stuff - zfs send/receive is neat | 15:34 | |
| android60 | so you think zfs better than xfs? | 15:35 |
| KurtKraut | android60, I'd say ZFS is more feature rich than XFS | 15:38 |
| RoyK | android60: way better | 15:41 |
| RoyK | android60: but not gpl, so you need to use it with FUSE on linux | 15:42 |
| RoyK | generally, it's better to use opensolaris | 15:42 |
| RoyK | btrfs is an attempt to make a zfs-like FS on linux, but it's not stable yet, and probably won't be for some time | 15:42 |
| RoyK | give btrfs 6-12 months and it might stabilise - zfs has been stable for some time | 15:43 |
| RoyK | zfs is close to four years old (after initial stable release) | 15:44 |
| RoyK | android60: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS <-- it's a wee bit more than XFS and the rest | 15:50 |
| android60 | ok ill check it out | 15:50 |
| Debolaz | ZFS++ | 16:02 |
| Debolaz | But while ZFS has some very cool technical features, the biggest plus it has is the extreme ease of administration. The tools are almost self-documenting in their simplicity. This is what I'm concerned about if btrfs will be able to replicate. When I've asked questions, I've been told that userfriendly tools aren't a focus. | 16:04 |
| RoyK | Debolaz: let's hope they will mend their ways - adminfriendlyness is quite important | 16:05 |
| RoyK | adminfriendliness, even | 16:06 |
| RoyK | imho userfriendliness doesn't apply to filesystems | 16:06 |
| Debolaz | The admin is the user of the filesystem tools. | 16:07 |
| RoyK | well, yes | 16:08 |
| RoyK | but I like to differ between "userfriendly" and "adminfriendly" | 16:09 |
| BrixSat | help :S | 16:39 |
| BrixSat | http://pastebin.com/m2431e1af | 16:39 |
| BrixSat | i cant solve this (fresh install) | 16:39 |
| RoyK | you probably have an apt-get update running by another process | 16:41 |
| shally87 | hi, anyone can help me forwarding my server? | 16:42 |
| shally87 | I have a dynamic address, and also ip80 | 16:42 |
| shally87 | port 80 i mean | 16:42 |
| shally87 | I follow the instruction from portforward.com | 16:43 |
| shally87 | but still I could not access my server from external IP | 16:43 |
| shally87 | anyone can help me? | 16:43 |
| BrixSat | yes that was coorect RoyK | 16:44 |
| BrixSat | thanks | 16:44 |
| BrixSat | shally87 that is a router issue | 16:45 |
| BrixSat | nat problem | 16:45 |
| BrixSat | reboot the router and try again | 16:45 |
| shally87 | how could i fix that? | 16:45 |
| BrixSat | also inside network try on browser put the machine ip | 16:46 |
| shally87 | I reboot it for more than 20 times since yesterday | 16:46 |
| shally87 | when i put the machine IP it is functioning | 16:46 |
| shally87 | but when I access the external ip, i could not access | 16:46 |
| shally87 | it show me the log in to the router | 16:46 |
| shally87 | then I change the router to use port 88 | 16:47 |
| shally87 | and now I access my router through 192.168.1.1:88 | 16:47 |
| shally87 | DCHP is set up for the machine.. | 16:47 |
| shally87 | Forgot to mention, i was using vbox.. and every virtual machine got own IP address.. | 16:48 |
| qman__ | shally87, many residential grade ISPs block port 80 on their end | 16:48 |
| shally87 | qman_: I've called the ISP and they mention it was not blocked.. | 16:49 |
| shally87 | does the ebox disturb this? | 16:49 |
| qman__ | if it shows the log in to the router, the router is preventing it from working | 16:50 |
| shally87 | yes | 16:50 |
| qman__ | in the router, disable remote administration | 16:50 |
| qman__ | and see if that fixes it | 16:50 |
| shally87 | ok.. | 16:51 |
| shally87 | oh, my router is DLINK-500T | 16:51 |
| === bogeyd6 is now known as linuxgolfer | ||
| === linuxgolfer is now known as bogeyd6 | ||
| shally87 | remote web management was disable from thebeginning... | 16:52 |
| bogeyd6 | :( | 16:53 |
| qman__ | but accessing your external IP still shows a router login? | 16:53 |
| shally87 | do i need to enable ppoe pass through? | 16:53 |
| qman__ | no | 16:53 |
| qman__ | just port forwarding | 16:54 |
| shally87 | no since I change the router administration to port 88 | 16:54 |
| qman__ | if the router has an SPI firewall, that may be interfering | 16:54 |
| qman__ | I've never luck with those on | 16:54 |
| shally87 | but accessing the external IP will give me failed to connect | 16:54 |
| shally87 | :-( | 16:55 |
| shally87 | does ebox disturb the connection? | 16:56 |
| qman__ | does the server have a firewall on? | 16:56 |
| shally87 | on ebox do you mean? | 16:56 |
| qman__ | sudo iptables -L | 16:56 |
| qman__ | I don't know ebox | 16:56 |
| === netadmin is now known as okaratas | ||
| qman__ | web interfaces are overrated | 16:57 |
| shally87 | Chain input, forward and output is accept | 16:57 |
| qman__ | ok then, the server is not dropping the connection | 16:58 |
| qman__ | it must be the router | 16:58 |
| shally87 | should be.. | 16:58 |
| shally87 | any fix for that? | 16:58 |
| shally87 | My last resort is buying a new router | 16:58 |
| qman__ | that's pretty much the fix, there's only one more thing for testing | 16:58 |
| qman__ | if the router has a DMZ setting, point it at your server | 16:59 |
| qman__ | this is not a secure setup and is only for testing, of course | 16:59 |
| qman__ | if it still doesn't work, the router is just not going to do it | 16:59 |
| shally87 | if i set up to DMZ, the other should I reset to original or I can keep the modified setting? | 16:59 |
| qman__ | try it both ways | 17:00 |
| shally87 | in modified setting, I already make it using DMZ but not functioning.. | 17:01 |
| shally87 | what left is resetting it.. | 17:01 |
| shally87 | brb | 17:02 |
| shally88 | hi | 17:12 |
| shally88 | qman__: it's not working | 17:12 |
| qman__ | if even the DMZ setting isn't working, that narrows it down | 17:13 |
| qman__ | we've established that the server is not blocking the connection, so that's not it | 17:13 |
| qman__ | the only remaining things are, if you are using the wrong internal IP, which is unlikely with the amount of work you've been doing | 17:14 |
| qman__ | if the ISP is actually blocking the port, even though they said they aren't | 17:14 |
| qman__ | or if the router is malfunctioning and won't forward traffic | 17:14 |
| shally88 | maybe the router | 17:14 |
| shally88 | my internal Ip i set for the VM is what it was used in the router.. | 17:15 |
| qman__ | those three are the only real possibilities left | 17:15 |
| shally88 | then i forward it to the ip which i get. | 17:15 |
| shally88 | but I have confusion over eth0 and eth1. | 17:15 |
| qman__ | oh, wait | 17:16 |
| qman__ | this is more likely a virtual networking problem | 17:16 |
| okaratas | benc ? | 17:16 |
| qman__ | can you get to the VM from a separate physical machine on the network? | 17:16 |
| shally88 | it is fixed when i dont use virtual machine is it? | 17:16 |
| okaratas | nick in this way should be BenC.. | 17:16 |
| okaratas | and benc nick not registered.. | 17:16 |
| okaratas | benc is not identified to services (nickserv) | 17:17 |
| shally88 | wait.. | 17:17 |
| qman__ | actually, this is really easy to diagnose | 17:17 |
| qman__ | in the virtual machine | 17:17 |
| qman__ | attempt to ping a site on the internet, like google.com | 17:17 |
| okaratas | this nick registered BenC to debian developer Ben Collins.. | 17:17 |
| qman__ | if it doesn't work, you have a virtual networking problem | 17:18 |
| shally88 | I could | 17:18 |
| qman__ | ok | 17:18 |
| qman__ | what type of virtual networking are you using? NAT or bridging? | 17:19 |
| qman__ | NAT could cause issues | 17:19 |
| shally88 | i was wondering in the ifconfig, i was using eth0 in my virtual machine | 17:19 |
| shally88 | bridging | 17:19 |
| shally88 | but when i see the vbox, it was set to eth1 | 17:19 |
| qman__ | your virtual machine will have network interfaces and so will the host | 17:20 |
| qman__ | so, the naming could be confusing | 17:20 |
| qman__ | just make sure that whatever interface the virtual machine is bridging to is connected to the network | 17:20 |
| qman__ | if the virtual machine can get to the internet, it's probably set up correctly | 17:20 |
| shally88 | it could | 17:21 |
| shally88 | do you mean if i set the vm to eth1, in the ifconfig of the vm i should see eth1 too? | 17:21 |
| qman__ | no | 17:22 |
| qman__ | in the VM config, you are choosing the host's interface, not the guest's | 17:22 |
| qman__ | the ifconfig in the VM shows the guest interfaces | 17:22 |
| shally88 | ok | 17:23 |
| qman__ | but, all that aside | 17:23 |
| qman__ | if the VM can reach the internet, and you can reach the web site running on the VM from the LAN, the virtual networking is working correctly | 17:24 |
| shally88 | ok | 17:24 |
| shally88 | then should it be the modem itself? | 17:24 |
| shally88 | or? | 17:24 |
| qman__ | could be the router, or the ISP | 17:24 |
| shally88 | the isp should be ok | 17:25 |
| qman__ | yeah, so it's most likely the router itself | 17:25 |
| shally88 | yes. | 17:25 |
| shally88 | I did check the port 80 to my external ip from some website, and it says it is not blocked. | 17:25 |
| shally88 | so this means the router is the problem. | 17:26 |
| qman__ | actually | 17:26 |
| qman__ | if you would /msg me your IP, do you mind if I test? | 17:26 |
| shally88 | i get this from one website now since i change the router admin page to port 88 | 17:27 |
| shally88 | Error: I could not see your service on 124.13.94.125 on port (80) | 17:27 |
| shally88 | Reason: Connection timed out | 17:27 |
| shally88 | sorry i went to paste my ip here.. | 17:28 |
| qman__ | that's fine, some people are just paranoid about giving that information out | 17:28 |
| shally88 | ok | 17:28 |
| benc | okaratas: good to know | 17:28 |
| qman__ | yeah, I'm not getting anything at all either | 17:29 |
| qman__ | it's blocking pings too | 17:29 |
| okaratas | benc, this nickname is owner Ben Collins.. | 17:29 |
| okaratas | /ns info benc | 17:29 |
| shally88 | that is when the DMZ is enable.. | 17:30 |
| shally88 | so it is the router problem is it? | 17:30 |
| qman__ | yes | 17:30 |
| qman__ | with DMZ enabled, it should be answering pings | 17:30 |
| shally88 | ok, but does it is affected by the page to the router admin page is change to port 88? | 17:31 |
| qman__ | it doesn't seem to be making a difference | 17:31 |
| shally88 | ok | 17:31 |
| shally88 | since it is like that, what router should be best> | 17:31 |
| qman__ | I like linksys units, the WRT54GL in particular | 17:32 |
| qman__ | but that's a wireless one, it really depends on your needs | 17:33 |
| shally88 | ok.. | 17:33 |
| qman__ | I recommend getting a separate modem and router | 17:33 |
| qman__ | the all in one units are prone to these kinds of problems | 17:33 |
| shally88 | what you mean by separate modem and router? | 17:34 |
| qman__ | getting a modem that is not a router, one that only acts as a gateway, and then a router which connects to it, to manage your DHCP and port forwarding, etc. | 17:34 |
| shally88 | owh.. | 17:35 |
| shally88 | i guess I have router with modem inside as the phone line directly connected to it.. | 17:35 |
| shally88 | btw I still use switch to divide the other pc | 17:35 |
| qman__ | that also increases the number of choices of router you can use | 17:35 |
| shally88 | ok | 17:36 |
| shally88 | here I usually found dlink and aztech.. | 17:36 |
| shally88 | which one in your opinion is better? | 17:36 |
| qman__ | I don't know aztech | 17:37 |
| qman__ | but I would not recommend dlink | 17:37 |
| shally88 | oh haha.. | 17:37 |
| shally88 | I try to look for linksys | 17:37 |
| qman__ | netgear has some good products too, just make sure you look up the model before you buy to see if it has issues | 17:38 |
| shally88 | ok | 17:38 |
| shally88 | before i try on my server.. do you think a 1mbps download with 384kbps upload is suitable for server? | 17:39 |
| shally88 | web hosting which has around 300visitors daily | 17:39 |
| qman__ | that depends entirely on what you intend to serve and how many people to serve to | 17:39 |
| qman__ | small files, that should be no problem | 17:39 |
| qman__ | keep your images under 500k, no file downloads, etc... | 17:40 |
| shally88 | it is usually depending on the upload is it? | 17:40 |
| qman__ | yes | 17:40 |
| benc | okaratas: are you bored? | 17:41 |
| benc | okaratas: leave me alone | 17:41 |
| shally88 | if in case the upload is lower than 384 it will not be suitable for a web hosting is it? | 17:41 |
| shally88 | 128kbps for example | 17:42 |
| qman__ | probably not, it depends entirely on how much users need to download from you | 17:42 |
| qman__ | if each web page is only 50k in total, it could work | 17:42 |
| qman__ | if it's image heavy, then no | 17:42 |
| shally88 | oh, haha. The wordpress installation itself is a heavy web app, then that would not work even in 384kbps | 17:43 |
| qman__ | well, the server load is fine, it's the size of the final web pages being served | 17:43 |
| qman__ | how much the users need to download | 17:43 |
| shally88 | ok.. | 17:44 |
| qman__ | when that saturates the 384k, you can't serve any faster | 17:44 |
| Bilge | You two sure are having fun | 17:44 |
| qman__ | if you have a lot of big images or flash objects, it won't work | 17:44 |
| shally88 | ok. | 17:44 |
| qman__ | but if it's mostly just text, you should be fine | 17:44 |
| shally88 | yeah. | 17:45 |
| shally88 | i guess home server is not ok with it... now the index file is 1180.6 KB | 17:46 |
| qman__ | yeah, that's way too much for a 384k line | 17:46 |
| shally88 | hi Bilge..I was asking few questions.. need pro to help me. | 17:46 |
| qman__ | that would take...25 seconds for one user to download | 17:46 |
| shally88 | :-/ I should then get a dedicated hosting itself.. | 17:47 |
| shally88 | and should serve more than 25sec when there is 20 user at a time.. | 17:47 |
| qman__ | you can get a VPS cheap | 17:47 |
| giovani | indeed -- VPSes can be had for dirt-cheap | 17:47 |
| shally88 | can recommend me one? | 17:47 |
| * okaratas I'm away.. | 17:48 | |
| shally88 | ok | 17:48 |
| shally88 | I was using shared hosting, and there is a problem with the cache. | 17:48 |
| shally88 | the server will load when i get sudden traffic. | 17:48 |
| giovani | I can't personally vouch for the company -- but VPSLink is quite large -- http://vpslink.com/ubuntu-vps/ | 17:49 |
| shally88 | it's a wordpress installation with wp-supercache | 17:49 |
| giovani | there are dozens of providers out there though -- google around, hit www.webhostingtalk.com -- there's a section for VPS deals | 17:49 |
| shally88 | that is helpful giovani.. | 17:50 |
| shally88 | btw, thanks a lot qman__ and giovani.. I would get my router fixed, and gotta look for VPS too.. | 17:51 |
| shally88 | Thanks again qman__ for spending your time helping me.. | 17:51 |
| qman__ | not a problem, good luck | 17:51 |
| shally88 | thanks.. | 17:52 |
| shally88 | bye | 17:52 |
| uvirtbot | New bug: #433556 in dhcp3 (main) "ethernet network connection not automatically connecting" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/433556 | 18:11 |
| === Claw_ is now known as Claw6 | ||
| uvirtbot | New bug: #406122 in bind9 (main) "BIND Dynamic Update DoS" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/406122 | 19:21 |
| === ball is now known as ball_ | ||
| uvirtbot | New bug: #413587 in libcommons-fileupload-java (universe) "Update license to Apache-2.0" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/413587 | 19:41 |
| alex-weeej | i've found a bug in karmic kvm or something that causes an instance to just die when i do something specific | 19:43 |
| alex-weeej | i can ssh to it, i can request web pages from a basic vhost, but if i try and use my webapp it explodes | 19:43 |
| alex-weeej | anyone know how i can debug? | 19:43 |
| alex-weeej | jdstrand, could this have anything to do with the apparmor stuff we did yesterday? | 19:43 |
| domas | Hi! will next LTS have systemtap with uprobes?!!? :) | 19:48 |
| domas | hhhmmmm, where is kernel debug symbol package in jaunty | 20:03 |
| domas | heh, hardy has linux-image-debug in 'main' | 20:30 |
| domas | meh, there's oprofile, there's systemtap, and there's no linux-image-debug | 20:31 |
| giovani | domas: check ddebs | 20:55 |
| domas | giovani: they have just karmic builds | 20:56 |
| domas | giovani: now intrepid/jaunty ones | 20:56 |
| domas | *no | 20:56 |
| * domas eyes http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/ | 20:56 | |
| giovani | ah, just build it yourself then? | 20:58 |
| domas | well, that means I will have to build myself all kernel packages | 20:59 |
| domas | an unwelcoming path that will get too much attention :) | 20:59 |
| domas | why would canonical package oprofile, systemtap and other stuff | 21:00 |
| domas | without adding debug symbols | 21:00 |
| uvirtbot | New bug: #427856 in bacula (universe) "bacula install script did not complete job (dup-of: 384607)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427856 | 21:22 |
| Chr1831 | what is a good smtp server for php? | 22:05 |
| qman__ | supported mail servers for ubuntu include postfix and exim | 22:07 |
| Chr1831 | qman__, does postfix require any setup for php to use sendmail?, also does postfix allow users to connect and send mail (i don't want that...) | 22:08 |
| === samferry is now known as Guest50151 | ||
| qman__ | Chr1831, it all depends on how you configure it | 22:10 |
| KurtKraut | Chr1831, I don't think you'll see a clear advantage in a option comparing to another. They're quite similar and equivalent | 22:18 |
| === zoopster1 is now known as zoopster | ||
| steady2023 | can someone reccomend me raid card for 15 hard drives good price good performance and reliability | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!