=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo === micahg1 is now known as micahg [08:58] hi [08:58] i have to find a different plcae [08:58] major construction site is my house tday [09:09] jackhammer noise is killing e === asac_ is now known as asac [10:22] asac, hi [10:23] bug 428109 [10:23] Launchpad bug 428109 in gwibber "Gwibber Needs to Use the new Messaging Menu API in Ubuntu" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/428109 [10:23] hm [10:24] fta: hi [10:25] oh dear .. my nerves are thin. this jackhammer thing kills me hard [10:33] i know the feeling, got that in front of my office all the summer [10:34] asac, btw, i dropped the testsuite deb in chromium [10:34] well ... in front is different from "they hit the basment of this house just 2 stories below" ;) [10:34] but i think its just today [10:34] fta: thats good decision i would think [10:35] i front was just below my window [10:35] fta: how does one build testsuite now? [10:35] heh [10:35] ok [10:35] it's built & run, but no longer packaged [10:35] cool [10:35] as long as all output is in log thats good enough [10:36] it should be all there [10:36] otherwise it's a bug [10:36] http://codereview.chromium.org/211036/show [10:37] seems the beta is near [10:39] do we understand how they release branchwise already? [10:41] we do, but it's difficult to replicate, bits are missing [11:00] ok uploaded epiphany extensions [12:25] andv: i have merged mozgest [12:58] im here for a bit. i slept a total of ~2hours from fri. night -> last night im a bit on the cranky side [12:59] dtchen: is there a reason why after every update of PA the sound gets muted? [13:10] asac: bdrung is there a reason we didnt merge branches to ~ubuntu-dev? we should really have a system to merge/remove branches from https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev when they have the packages have been pushed to archive. [13:13] gnomefreak: yes [13:14] bdrung: there is a reason we dont merge them? [13:16] also imagezoom is fixed waiting for push. sorry just going through the extension pages [13:16] gnomefreak: no. [13:16] no to your first question and yes to the second question. [13:16] this is confusing: https://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions [13:21] ok thanks, looking at link [13:23] what is confusing about it? [13:23] very long [13:24] agreed [13:28] im going to lay down for a while. [16:13] bdrung: if you get time can you review and push https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/firebug.ubuntu and https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/firefox-showcase.ubuntu [16:14] k [16:15] thanks === fta2_ is now known as fta2 [16:20] bdrung: so the guy on pkg-mozext mailing list now wants to put stuff in /usr/lib ;) [16:20] not sure if we want to auto detect that [16:20] which should be possible [16:20] or allow special overrides or something [16:20] asac: or a variable for that? [16:21] but what kind of variable? [16:21] dunno :) [16:21] i think debian folks wouldnt be happy if we allowes just: either all or none in /usr/lib [16:21] they want properly split stuff [16:21] though i disagree [16:21] bdrung: i think we can look at architecture: field [16:22] if the binary package is any -> /usr/lib [16:22] otherwise /usr/share [16:22] imo one can argue that splitting stuff up in a arch any package makes no sense anyway [16:22] asac: good idea [16:23] if architecture != all -> /usr/lib [16:24] architecture could be a list of archs, too [16:25] right [16:25] thats correct [16:51] bdrung: last one for me today https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/mozilla-ctxextensions.ubuntu stumbleupon is a fail to build but looks like something easy i just dont hav etime today. i attached the failure file to bug report incase someone gets to it before i do [16:55] k [16:55] gnomefreak: currently i fix mozilla-imagezoom [16:55] bdrung: what was wrong with it? [16:56] MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND was not set [16:56] i do not like the long rules file [16:57] ok off travelling ... will be back later (2-3 hours) [16:57] let me look at mine i thought it was set [16:57] asac: have fun [17:00] #MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = sh build.sh should just remove the # but it builds fine and works fine anyway [17:01] and yes it is fairly long. we should change this in XPI.TEMPLATE than for new extensions to be lest amount of rules [17:02] ok im gone. be back sometime this week [18:04] asac, anything I can do to help out fixing bug #429835 ? [18:04] Launchpad bug 429835 in firefox-3.5 "[MASTER] chrome error when viewing untrusted https site using firefox with non en-US locale on karmic" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/429835 [20:00] cyphermox: yes ;) [20:00] cyphermox: its a bit tricky though [20:00] cyphermox: what i need is a grep/sed expression to filter out any xml entity definition [20:00] at best one line for each [20:00] if you want to try i can give you details ;) [20:12] asac, perl? ;) [20:27] fta: so what i need to parse is [20:27] across multiple line [20:27] do you have an example? [20:29] and what do you need as output? [20:33] asac, ^^ [20:33] fta: echo the match [20:33] is the output [20:35] asac: If I"m going to make xul-193-gnome-support-dbg replace ff3.7-gnome-support-dbg, do I have to mark Conflicts as well As Replaces? [20:36] micahg: sorry. not sure what you try to do ;) [20:36] so Replaces: means that there are same files shipped in the package [20:36] asac: ff3.7-gnome-support is only an xml file now [20:37] no libs [20:37] if there is a versioned replaces it usually means that files that were in the version or earlier of the one package [20:37] moved to a new one [20:37] Yep [20:37] micahg: what xml file? [20:37] that's what happened [20:37] the gnomevfs file moved from ff3.7 to xul193 [20:37] which file moved? the gvfs stuff? [20:37] ok [20:38] there are no longer any compiled libs in the ff37gnomesuport pkg [20:38] so you need a versioned replaces [20:38] micahg: but did the same file move? or was it renamed? [20:38] moved [20:46] asac, should it match multiple times? [20:49] fta: one second [20:49] fta: http://people.canonical.com/~asac/tmp/test.txt [20:50] so basically if you pipe in the input, the output should be 4 times the result ;) [20:50] ok [20:51] fta: brandDtd is a variable match [20:51] DTD [20:52] so assume a-zA-Z-_0-9 ;) [20:54] fta@ix:/tmp $ perl -e 'undef $/; $_ = <>; while (s/(<\!ENTITY)\s+(%)\s+(\S+)\s+(SYSTEM)\s+(".*?")\s*(>)//s) { print "$1 $2 $3 $4 $5$6\n"}' /tmp/test.txt [20:54] [20:54] [20:54] [20:54] [20:54] [20:55] is that what you want? [20:55] fta, I'm too late but about to get to the same regex [20:58] hehe [20:58] regexp contest ;) [20:58] very good [21:29] asac: is version replaces different than Adding replaces in debian/control? [21:51] * BUGabundo waves o/ [21:55] micahg: its a versioned replaces [21:55] not an unversioned one ;) [21:55] Replaces: ... (<< 1.1) [21:57] asac: ah, well, it's unreleased [21:58] so is that necessary? === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo [22:31] micahg: thats a different question [22:32] imo its good to do right [22:32] and that is with versions [22:32] otherwise no repla ce at alll i would think [22:32] asac: ok, so do I do a major revision like 3.7 or a minor one like 3.7~a1~... === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo [23:04] hi [23:04] i'm getting a seg fault when opening gmail and clicking buttons like archive/delete.. [23:05] http://pastebin.com/d2a8c7834 [23:05] asac: micahg: ^^^^^^^^ [23:06] afv: pleas install the xulrunner-1.9.3-dbg [23:06] oops [23:06] 1.9.1 [23:06] eheh [23:06] already stuck on 3.7 ? [23:06] lol [23:06] installed. [23:07] hmm [23:07] afv: now do : firefix -g [23:07] installed now. it wasn't installed :p [23:07] then hit 'r' [23:07] and try to reproduce [23:07] BUGabundo: my mind is stuck on trunk :) [23:07] *firefox -g of course [23:08] afv: it looks more like a gtk problem than a FF one though [23:08] sure [23:08] i've seen that gtk warnings/errors before but without a seg fault [23:09] afv: we've had gtk segfaults before especially on karmic [23:10] at pastebin what Syntax highlighting is best for this? [23:10] bash? [23:10] C++ maybe? [23:11] http://pastebin.com/d3b26fab3 [23:11] ugh [23:12] maybe bash would be better ;) [23:12] bash :p http://pastebin.com/d2cbbd6c6 [23:13] at least it's not all green [23:14] I'd figure out what package this is in: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-uim.so [23:14] then install the dbg pkg [23:14] and search that pacakge for a similar crash [23:15] how can i check that? [23:15] dpkg -S filename [23:15] thanks [23:15] uim-gtk2.0: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-uim.so [23:16] afv: is apport not catching it? [23:16] i don't think so [23:17] installing libuim6-dbg... [23:20] should i see something new at gdb? [23:22] yeah, the last 3 calls should be resolved now [23:23] hmm [23:23] http://pastebin.com/d6168c119 [23:24] yeah [23:24] see, no more ?? [23:24] ah, this.. " 0x022f2f22 in ??" [23:24] now, I'd say check for a gtk crash that's similar [23:25] afv: it's a gtk problem [23:26] afv: look at lines 14 and 15 of your pastebin [23:26] yes [23:26] where should that file be located? [23:27] afv: idk, in the codebase [23:27] or this folders, glib2.0-2.21.6/gobject [23:27] hmm ok [23:29] i'm tempted to remove the uim packages.. :p [23:35] can't find similar crashes.. [23:38] with firefox-3.7 i got another error [23:38] let me just install xulrunner-1.9.3-dbg [23:44] hmm.. looks the same now. http://pastebin.com/d23fdceb9 [23:46] micahg, :p [23:54] afv: I'm not familiar with the uim [23:54] just opening gmail and wait a few seconds: http://pastebin.com/d6e2a45f7 [23:55] afv: that's a different crash [23:55] maybe it's related? :s [23:56] afv: doubtful [23:57] *removing uim*... :( [23:58] testing with 3.5.4 again [23:59] no glib warnings.. [23:59] ops. crash. lol